'
희귀의약품 정책의 영향 분석 및 국내 희귀질환 관련 의료이용 형평성 = The effects of orphan drug policy and equity in healthcare utilization for rare diseases in Korea' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 요약
주제
의료이용
정책연구
형평성
희귀의약품
희귀질환
동일주제 총논문수
논문피인용 총횟수
주제별 논문영향력의 평균
356
0
0.0%
주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력
주제
주제별 논문수
주제별 피인용횟수
주제별 논문영향력
주제어
의료이용
116
0
0.0%
정책연구
39
0
0.0%
형평성
194
0
0.0%
희귀의약품
4
0
0.0%
희귀질환
3
0
0.0%
계
356
0
0.0%
* 다른 주제어 보유 논문에서 피인용된 횟수
0
'
희귀의약품 정책의 영향 분석 및 국내 희귀질환 관련 의료이용 형평성 = The effects of orphan drug policy and equity in healthcare utilization for rare diseases in Korea' 의 참고문헌
van Doorslaer E. Socioeconomic inequalities in health : measurement , computation and statistical inference
[1997]
and Shkukler C. The Charlson Comorbidity Index Can Be Used Prospectively to Identify Patients Who Will Incur High Future Costs
9 ( 12 )[2014]
and Purvina S. Impact of orphan durgs on Latvian budget .
11 ( 59 ) .[2016]
and Kruntoradova K. Expe nditures and Availability of Orphan Drugs in the Czech Republic : Seven Year Experience
15 ( 7 ) : A434 .
and Hakkaart L. Orphan drugs expenditure in the Netherlands in the period 2006-2012
[2014]
Who Will Adopt the Orphan Drugs
3:221-224[1979]
Whitehead M. Inequalities in health : The Black report
[1988]
What is wrong with orphan drug policies ?
15 ( 8 ) :1185-91 .[2012]
WHO. (2008). "mhGAP: Mental Health Gap Action Programme: scaling up care for mental, neurological and substance use disorders".
W. The Expenditure and Reimbursement of Orphan Drug in Taiwan : Challenges and Opportunities
19 ( 3 ) : A255 .[2016]
Van Doorslaer E. On the measurement of inequaliti es in health
33:545 ? 57[1991]
Van Doorslaer E. Measuring and testing for inequity in the delivery of health care
35 ( 4 ) :716-733 .[2000]
Tsuchiya A. Orphan drugs and the NHS : should w e value rarity ?
331:1016-1019[2005]
Top 20 Orphan Drugs Availab ility , Pricing and Reimbursement in Slovakia : 2005-2012 Review
17 ( 7 ) : A540 ? 41 .[2014]
The familial technique for linking maternal death with poverty
363:23-27[2004]
The Orphan Drug Act Restoring the Mission to Rare Diseases .
201 6 ; 39:210-21000003 .
The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics
47 ( 1 ) :239-53 .[1980]
The European challenges of funding orphan medicinal products
[2018]
The Budget Impact of Orphan Dr ugs in the US : A 2007-2013 MIDAS Sales Data Analysis
[2019]
Tesar T. Eight years e xperience with availability and uptake of orphan drugs with or without pr ior EU orphan designation in Slovakia
17 : A235 .[2014]
Tang W. Rare diseases , orphan dru gs , and their regulation in Asia : Current status and future perspectives . I ntractable & rare diseases research
1 ( 1 ) :3 ? 9 .[2012]
System of Health Accounts ( SHA 201 1 )
[2019]
Stefanov R. Budget Impact o f Rare Diseases : Proposal for a Theoretical Framework Based on Evidenc e from Bulgaria
( 242 ) :46 ? 53 .[2015]
State initiatives to control medicat ion costs ; can transparency legislation help ?
374:230 1 ? 04[2016]
Soria-Soto M. Analysis and Evolution of Spending on O rphan Drugs
24 : A57 .[2017]
Social-class inequality in infant mortality in England and Wal es from 1921-1980
4 ( 1 ) :1-21 .[1988]
Simoens S. Drugs for rare diseases-or phan designation status influences price .
9:1-5[2011]
Sherman B. Sunset Implementation : A Positive Partnership to m ake Government Work
28 ( 1 ) :78-81[1978]
S.Calculating Income Distribution Indices from Microdata .
41 ( 1 ) :139 ? 42 .[1988]
Rovira J. Assessing the eConomicChallenges posed by orphan drugs
23:36-42[2007]
Relating price determi nation to disease prevalence
341 : c4615 .[2010]
RareCancers : a sea of oppor tunity .
17 : e52-e61[2016]
Rare Diseases and Orphan Products : Accelerati ng Research and Development
Available : https : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books /NBK56184/[2010]
Quasi-experimentation : Design Analysis Is sues for Field Settings
[1979]
Public Expenditure on Auth orised Orphan Drugs in theCzech Republic Between 2008 and 2013
17 : A526[2014]
Prices and availability of biopharmaceuticals : an internationalComparison
Policies for Orph an Diseases and Orphan Drugs
[2009]
Pharmaceutical spending
[2019]
Petrova G. National health insurance fund cost analysis for rare cancer diseases and orphan drugs .
17 ( 1 ) :13 ? 18 .[2015]
Pani L. The ‘ Weight ’ of Orphan Drugs in the European Pharmaceutical Policy . A Focus on the Ex penditure and the Utilization of Orphan Drugs in Five European Union C ountries
15 ( 4 ) : A20 .[2012]
Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects
[1981]
Paci P. Equity in the Finance and Deliver y of Health Care : Some Tentative Cross-Country Comparisons
1989:5 ( 1 ) ; 89-112
Outrageous prices of orphan drugs : a call for collaboration
392:791-94[2018]
Orphan Drug Act of 1983 Availabl e
https : //www.fda.gov/media/99546/download[2018]
O. Hori zontal Equity in Health Care Utilization Evidence from Three High-incom e Asian Countries
2007:64 ( 1 ) ; 199-212
New approach to cancer therapy ba sed on a molecularly defined cancer classification
6 4:70 ? 74[2014]
Methods of Measuring the Concentration of Wealth
9 ( 70 ) :209-219 .[1905]
Matusewicz W. The availability a nd Expenditure of Orphan Medicines in Poland .
1 8 : A304[2015]
M. Predicted versus Actual Budget Impact of High-Cost Drugs in Ireland
17 ( 7 ) : A426 ? 27[2014]
Longitudinal Changes in Prevalence of Rare Diseas es and Related Costs in Taiwan ( 2003-2014 )
25:122-23[2016]
L. Determinants and Equity Evaluation for H ealth Expenditure Among Patietns with Rare diseases in China .
129 ( 112 ) :1387~1393[2016]
Kosztolanyi G. Shift of focus in the fina ncing of Hungarian drugs . Reimbursement for orphan drugs for treating rare diseases : financing of enzyme replacement therapy in Hungary
155 ( 44 ) :1735 ? 41 .[2014]
Kos M. Patient Access to Medicines for Rare Disea ses in European Countries .
21 ( 5 ) :553 ? 60 .[2018]
Koolman X. Inequalities in access to medi cal care by income in developed countries
174 ( 2 ) :177-183 .[2006]
Kaura S. Pharmace utical expenditure on drugs for rare diseases in Canada : a historical ( 200 7 ? 13 ) and prospective ( 2014 ? 18 ) MIDAS sales data analysis .
11 ( 68 ) .[2016]
Kaura S. Orphan Drug Exp enditures in the United States : A Historical and Prospective analysis , 200 7-18
35 ( 9 ) :1588-1594 .[2016]
J. Characteristics of clinical trials to support approval of orphan vs nonorphan drugs for cancer
305 ( 22 ) :2320-2326 .[2011]
Inequalities in medical care utilization by south korean cancer patients according to i ncome : a retrospective cohort study
41 ( 1 ) :51-66 .[2011]
Hydroxyurea for the treatment of sickle cell anemia358:1362 ?
69[2008]
Hutchings A. Estimating the Budget Impact of Orp han Medicines in Europe : 2010 - 2020
[2011]
Heme ls M. Do payers value rarity ? An analysis of the relationship between dis ease rarity and orphan drug prices in Europe
5 ( 1 ) :1299665 .[2017]
Health inequalities : Europe in profile . An independent , e xpert report commissioned by the UK Presidency of the EU
[2005]
Health Inequalities Policy in Korea : Cuttent Status and Future C hqallenges
274 : S33-40 .[2012]
Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Proce dures
2 nd Edition[2000]
Global Spending on Orphan D rugs in France , Germany , the UK , Italy and Spain during 2007
8 ( 5 ) :301-315 .[2010]
Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research
[1963]
Evaluation Policyb
[1976]
Evaluation : A Systematic Approach ( 7t h ed. )
[2004]
Estimating the budget impact of orphan drugs in Sweden and France 2013-2020
13 ( 9 ) :22[2014]
Equity in the Finance of Health Car e : Some Further International Comparisons
18 ( 3 ) :263-90 .[1999]
Economic costs of health inequ alities in the European Union
65 ( 5 ) : 412-9 .[2011]
Disease and economic burden for rare diseases in Taiwan : A longitudinal study using Taiwan 's National Health Insurance Research Database
13 ( 9 ) : e0204206 .[2018]
Delayed Access for Patients With Rare Diseases in Asia Pacifi c : Finding a Solution That Works .
[2018]
Colak E. Orphan Drug Market Analysis in Turkey
19 : A581 .[2016]
Budgetary Impact of Medicinal Therapies for Rare Diseases in Bulgaria .
60 ( 1 ) :79 ? 91[2018]
Budget impact analysis of drug s for ultra-orphan non-oncological diseases in Europe
15 ( 1 ) :171-179 .[2015]
Budget Impact of Orphan Drugs in Denmark Compared to Other European Countries
20 10 ; 13 ( 7 ) : A414
Barbeau M. Expenditures on Orphan Drugs in Cana da , Europe ( EU5 < Belgium , Sweden and the Netherlands ) and Australia in 2009
15 ( 7 ) : A434 .[2012]
Are rare diseases still orphans or ha ppily adopted ? The challenges of developing and using orphan medicina l products
62:264-271[2006]
Access to Orphan Drugs : A Comprehensive Review of Legislations , Regulations and Policies in 35 Countries
10 ( 10 ) : e0140002 .[2015]
A synthesis of drug reimbursement decision-making proc esses in organisation for econonmic Cooperation and development count ries
97. The Pharmaceutical Affair Law 145-10 August 1960 ? Revised in 1993 (J apan)
96. Taiwan MOHW. National Health Expenditure 2017. Available: https://www. mohw.gov.tw/cp-4271-46084-2.html [Accessed 2019; 7: 21]
93. Survey of the delay in diagnosis for 8 rare diseases in Europe (‘Eurordis Care2’) Available : https://www.eurordis.org/publication/survey-delay-diagn osis-8-rare-diseases-europe-%E2%80%98eurordiscare2%E2%80%99 [Access ed: 2019; 6: 12]
92. Suppe P. A Probabilistic Theory of Causality: Amsterdam, North Holland, 1970.
90. Suchman E. Evaluative Research. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 196 7:122-123.
88. Simoens S. Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for m ore transparency. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6(1):42.
79. Rinaldi A. Adopting an orphan. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:507-510.
[2005]
78. Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Co uncil of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products. Official Journ al of the European Communities. 2000;L018(43):1?6.
77. Pomeranz K. Orphan Drug Report 2017. EvaluatepPharma, 2017.
73. Pacific Bridge Medical. Orphan drugs in Asia 2017. https://www.pacificbr idgemedical.com/research-report/orphan-drugs-asia-report-2017/ [Accesse d 2019; 6: 19]
72. Orphan drug Act, Public Law 97-414, 4 January 1983 (US). Available: htt ps://www.fda.gov/media/99546/download [Accessed 2019; 4: 12]
71. Orphan Drug Act Title 21, Food and Drugs. Part 316-Orphan Drugs, 199 3. Available: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSe arch.cfm?CFRPart=316&showFR=1 [Accessed 2019; 4 :11]
56. Levitan SA and Wurzburg G. Evaluating Federal Social Programs. Kalama zoo, Michigan: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1979.
55. Koolman X and Doorslaer E. On the interpretation of a cnocentration in dex of inequality. Health Econ. 2004;13:649-656
54. Kohler U and Frauke K. Data Analysis Using Stata, 2nd ed: College Stati on, Texas, Stata Press Publication, 2005.
46. Health Canada, Office of Legislative and Regulatory Modernization. Initial draft discussion document for a Canadian orphan drug regulatory frame work. 2012. Avaliable: https://www.raredisorders.ca/content/uploads/Prop osal-for-Orphan-Drug-Framework_dec-12-2012.pdf [Accessed 2018; 12: 1]
45. IQVIA . Orphan Drugs in the United States: Exclusivity, Pricnig and Treat ed Populations. IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science. 2018. Available: https://www.iqvia.com/-/media/iqvia/pdfs/institute-reports/orphan-drugs-in -the-united-states-exclusivity-pricing-and-treated-populations.pdf?_=15719 00259418 [Accessed 2019; 10: 23]
44. IMF. GDP per capita database. Available:https://www.imf.org/external/data mapper/NGDPDPC@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD/EUQ/ [Accessed 2 019; 6: 29]
38. Harper M. The world most expensive drugs. Available: https://www.forbe s.com/2010/02/19/expensive-drugs-cost-business-healthcare-rare-diseases.h tml#2fb30c285e10 [Accessed: 2018; 11: 27]
37. Hadjivasiliou A. Orphan Drug Report 2017. EvaluatepPharma (2017) Avail able: http://info.evaluategroup.com/rs/607-YGS-364/images/EPOD17.pdf [A ccessed: 2019; 5: 3]
28. European Union. COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 847/2000 of 27 Ap ril 2000. Available: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/pu blication/7f34e7b0-9c3c-4dab-9ba1-e088192a54c8 [Accessed:2018; 12:6]
27. European Medicines Agency. Orphan Medicine figures. Available: http://w ww.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2015/04/WC500185 766.pdf [Accessed: 2018; 11: 27]
2. Australian government. Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 section 16H 1990. Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2018C00897 [Access ed 2019; 6: 18]
12. WHO, Prevention and management of osteoporosis, in WHO Technical Report Series, W.S. Group, Editor. 2003.
12. Carlos N. ‘The Political Economy of Hope:Patients’ Organizations, Science and Biovalue. BioSocieties. 2006;1(3):289?305.
11. Carlos N. Orphan Drugs, Patient Activism and Contemporary Healthcare. Quaderni. 2009;68:13?23.
109. WHO. Cardiovascular diseases: what are cardiovascular diseases? Genev a, World Health Organization. Available: https://www.who.int/health-topic s/cardiovascular-diseases/ [Accessed 2019;10:1]
107. Wagstaff A. Inequality Aversion, Health Inequalities and Health Achieve ment. Journal of Helath Economics. 2002;21(4):627-41.
100. US Food and Drug Administration. 2016 Novel Drugs Summary. Availab le: https://www.fda.gov/media/102618/download [Accessed 2019; 1: 12]
1. America's Health Insurance Plans. Orphan Drug Utilization and Pricing pat tern (2012?2014). Available: https://www.ahip.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/ 10/OrphanDrug_DataBrief_10.21.16.pdf [Accessed 2018; 11: 27]
'
희귀의약품 정책의 영향 분석 및 국내 희귀질환 관련 의료이용 형평성 = The effects of orphan drug policy and equity in healthcare utilization for rare diseases in Korea'
의 유사주제(
) 논문