연구동향 분석
박사

공공 R&D과제 기반 유망기술(군) 도출 방법에 관한 연구 : 에너지분야 기초원천기술을 중심으로 = A Study on Method of Deriving Emerging Technology based on the Public R&D Funding Data: Basic Technology Field in Energy Sector

허요섭 2019년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 공공 R&D과제 기반 유망기술(군) 도출 방법에 관한 연구 : 에너지분야 기초원천기술을 중심으로 = A Study on Method of Deriving Emerging Technology based on the Public R&D Funding Data: Basic Technology Field in Energy Sector' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • R＆amp
  • d정책
  • 공공 R&D 과제 투자정보
  • 기계학습
  • 빅데이터
  • 에너지
  • 유망기술
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
4,253 0

0.0%

' 공공 R&D과제 기반 유망기술(군) 도출 방법에 관한 연구 : 에너지분야 기초원천기술을 중심으로 = A Study on Method of Deriving Emerging Technology based on the Public R&D Funding Data: Basic Technology Field in Energy Sector' 의 참고문헌

  • 과학계량학 연구동향 및 과학기술 정책 분야 응용가능성. KISTEP ISSUE PAPER2013-06
    양현재 정우성 한국과학기술기획평가원 [2013]
  • 『미래지향형 과학기술혁신 거버넌스 설계 및 개선방안』
  • 「통합적 혁신정책 구현을 위한 정책 인텔리전스 발전 방안」
    성지은 STEPI: Issues & Policy, 58, 1-16 [2012]
  • 「정부 R&D 예산 편성의 전략성 제고를 위한 혁신 과제」
    강문상 박석종 KISTEP: KISTEP Issue Weekly, 2018-12(230) [2018]
  • 「사회발전과 과학기술 - 21 세기 유럽의 연구 및 혁신 정책」
    송위진 STEPI: 정책자료, 1-129 [2003]
  • 「빅데이터 동향 및 정책 시사점. 정보통신정책연구원」
    박현수 배동민 오기환 (KISDI), 25(10), 37-74 [2013]
  • 「국내 R&D 사업 기획 현황 및 시사점」
    심선우 임현 KISTEP: KISTEP Issue Weekly, 2015-03(230) [2015]
  • 「국가기술혁신체계(NIS) 고도화를 위한 국가 R&D 혁신방안(안)」
    과학기술정보통신부 국가과학기술자문회의 [2018]
  • 「과학기술 거버넌스: 압축 성장의 신화와 절박한 미래」
    송하중 STEPI: 과학기술정책, 224, 56-61 [2017]
  • 「脫추격형 기술혁신체제의 모색」
    송위진 STEPI [2007]
  • 「4 차 산업혁명 대비 미래산업 정책 분석 Ⅱ: 과학기술 거버넌스와 R&D 혁신 대책 분석」
    국회예산정책처 국회예산정책처 [2017]
  • 「2016 년도 과학기술정책의 과학화 기반구축 사업」
    김병수 한국과학기술기획평가원(KISTEP) [2017]
  • “거래비용관점에서의 정부신뢰와 공직부패와의 관계”
    박형준 서인석 『한국정책학회보』, 21(3): 291-324 [2012]
  • ‘통합형 혁신정책 구현을 위한 정책수단과 과제'
    성지은 「기술혁신학회지」, 12(3), 662-686 [2009]
  • Řehůřek, R. (2013). ‘Deep learning with word2vec and gensim, RARETECHNOLOGIES’, https://rare-technologies.com/deep-learning-with-word2vec-and-gensim/
  • Řehůřek, R. (2011). ‘Scalability of Semantic Analysis in Natural Language Processing’, Doctoral dissertation, Masarykova univerzita, Fakulta informatiky.
  • tot Pannerden, F. V. N. (2011). ‘Policy Instruments’, https://repub.eur.nl/pub/33101/ metis_154870.pdf.
  • de Miranda Santo, M., Coelho, G. M., dos Santos, D. M., and Fellows Filho, L. (2006). ‘Text mining as a valuable tool in foresight exercises: A study on nanotechnology’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 1013-1027.
  • Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., Wang, X., Zhu, D., and Porter, A. L. (2013). ‘A hybrid visualisation model for technology roadmapping: bibliometrics, qualitative methodology and empirical study’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(6), 707-724
  • Young, W. B. and Young, W. B. (2001), ‘Unintended Consequences of Health Policy Programs and Policies: Workshop Summary’. National Academy Press.
  • Yi, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, X. and Wan, J. (2017). ‘A Novel Text Clustering Approach Using Deep-Learning Vocabulary Network’, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017.
  • Yazan, A. M. (2016). ‘Methods Used in Future Technology Analysis and its Selection: an application to VTOL transportation system’, IET Working Papers Series, 1-25.
  • Xu, J., Wang, P., Tian, G., Xu, B., Zhao, J., Wang, F. and Hao, H. (2015, May). ‘Short Text Clustering via Convolutional Neural Networks’, In VS@ HLT-NAACL (pp. 62- 69).
  • Wende, K. (2007). ‘A model for data governance-Organising accountabilities for data quality management’, ACIS 2007 Proceedings, 80.
  • Weber, K., Otto, B., and sterle, H. (2009). ‘One size does not fit all---a contingency approach to data governance’, Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), 1(1), 4.
  • Watts, R. J., Porter, A. L. and Newman, N. C. (1998). ‘Innovation forecasting using bibliometrics’, Competitive Intelligence Review: Published in Cooperation with the Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals, 9(4), pp.11-19.
  • Wang, R. Y. and Strong, D. M. (1996), “Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers,” Journal of management information systems, 12(4), 5-33.
  • Vie, L. L., Griffith, K. N., Scheier, L. M., Lester, P. B., and Seligman, M. E. (2013). ‘The Person-Event Data Environment: leveraging big data for studies of psychological strengths in soldiers’, Frontiers in psychology, 4, 934.
  • Van der Valk, T., Moors, E. H., and Meeus, M. T. (2009). ‘Conceptualizing patterns in the dynamics of emerging technologies: The case of biotechnology developments in the Netherlands’, Technovation, 29(4), 247-264.
  • Ulschak, F.L. (1983). ‘Human resource development: The theory and practice of need assessment’, Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company, Inc.
  • Turoff, M. and Hiltz, S.R. (1996). ‘Computer based Delphi process’, In: M. Adler, & E. Ziglio (Eds.), ‘Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health’ (pp. 56-88). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Turoff, M. (1970). ‘The design of a policy Delphi’, Technological forecasting and social change, 2(2), 149-171.
  • Tseng, Y. H., Lin, C. J., and Lin, Y. I. (2007). ‘Text mining techniques for patent analysis’, Information Processing & Management, 43(5), 1216-1247.
  • Trippi. J. (2012). ‘How Technology Has Restored the Soul of Politics’, MIT Technology Reivew, January/February 2013 Issue.
  • Tierney, R., Hermina, W. and Walsh, S. (2013) ‘The Pharmaceutical Technology Landscape: A New Form of Technology Roadmapping’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 194–211
  • Steinbach, M., Karypis, G., and Kumar, V. (2000, August). ‘A comparison of document clustering techniques’, In KDD workshop on text mining (Vol. 400, No. 1, pp. 525-526).
  • Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., and Flick, C. (2017). ‘Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication TechnologiesOn the implementation of responsible research and innovation’, Science and Public Policy, 44(3), 369-381.
  • Stafinski, T., Topfer, L. A., Zakariasen, K., and Menon, D. (2010). ‘The role of surgeons in identifying emerging technologies for health technology assessment’, Canadian Journal of Surgery, 53(2), 86.
  • Srinivasan, R. (2008). ‘Sources, characteristics and effects of emerging technologies: Research opportunities in innovation’, Industrial Marketing Management, 37(6), 633- 640.
  • Small, H., Boyack, K. W., and Klavans, R. (2014). ‘Identifying emerging topics in science and technology’, Research Policy, 43(8), 1450-1467.
  • Slamet, C., Rahman, A., Ramdhani, M. A. and Darmalaksana, W. (2016). ‘Clustering the Verses of the Holy Qur'an using K-Means Algorithm’, Asian Journal of Information Technology, 15(24), pp.5159-5162.
  • Simera, I., Moher, D., Hirst, A., Hoey, J., Schulz, K. F., and Altman, D. G. (2010). ‘Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network’, BMC medicine, 8(1), 24.
  • Siliverstovs, B. (2016). ‘R&D and non-linear productivity growth’, Research Policy, 45(3), 634-646.
  • Siegel, R. L., and Weinberg, L. (1977). ‘Comparing Public Policies: United States, Soviet Union, and Europe’, Dorsey Press.
  • Shin, T. (1998). ‘Using Delphi for a long-range technology forecasting, and assessing directions of future R&D activities the Korean exercise’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58(1-2), 125-154.
  • Shim, W., Kwon, O. J., Moon, Y. H., and Kim, K. H. (2016). ‘Understanding the Dynamic Convergence Phenomenon from the Perspective of Diversity and Persistence: A Cross Sector Comparative Analysis between the United States and South Korea’, PloS one, 11(7), e0159249.
  • Sharif, N. (2006). ‘Emergence and development of the national innovation systems concept’, Research Policy, 35, 745-766.
  • Shah, N. and Mahajan, S., (2012). ‘Document clustering: a detailed review’, International Journal of Applied Information Systems, 4(5), pp.30-38.
  • Serban, M. (2015). ‘Supporting public policy making through policy analysis and policy learning’, European Training Foundation.
  • Seong, J., and Song, W. (2008). ‘Policy integration as a new approach for policy coordination: focused on science, technology and innovation policy’, The Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 11(3), 352 –375. (Text in Korean).
  • Semanjski, I., Bellens, R., Gautama, S., and Witlox, F. (2016). ‘Integrating big data into a sustainable mobility policy 2.0 planning support system’, Sustainability, 8(11), 1142.
  • Schwarz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics 6 (2):461-464.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.
  • Salter, A. J., and Martin, B. R. (2001). ‘The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review’, Research policy, 30(3), 509-532.
  • Sahlgren, M. (2008). ‘The distributional hypothesis’, Italian Journal of Disability Studies, 20, 33-53.
  • Sahal, D. (1985). ‘Technological guideposts and innovation avenues’, Research policy, 14(2), 61-82.
  • Sadoulet, E. and De Janvry, A. (1995), ‘Quantitative development policy analysis’ (Vol. 1). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Russell Neuman, W., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S., and Bae, S. Y. (2014). ‘The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data’, Journal of Communication, 64(2), 193-214.
  • Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). ‘Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis’, Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 20, pp.53-65.
  • Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., and Martin, B. R. (2015). ‘What is an emerging technology?’, Research Policy, 44(10), 1827-1843.
  • Rosenbloom, J. L., and Ginther, D. K. (2017). ‘Show me the Money: Federal R&D Support for Academic Chemistry, 1990–2009’, Research Policy, 46(8), 1454-1464.
  • Rosenbloom, J. L., Ginther, D. K., Juhl, T., and Heppert, J. A. (2015). ‘The effects of research & development funding on scientific productivity: Academic chemistry, 1990- 2009’, PloS one, 10(9), e0138176.
  • Roper, A., Cunningham, S., Porter, A., Mason, T., Rossini, F. and Banks, J. (2011). ‘Forecasting and management of technology’, N.Y.:John Wiley.
  • Rongping, M., Zhongbao, R., Sida, Y., and Yan, Q. (2008). ‘Technology foresight towards 2020 in China: the practice and its impacts’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(3), 287-307.
  • Romesburg, C. (2004). ‘Cluster analysis for researchers’, Lulu.com.
  • Romer, P. M. (1990). ‘Endogenous technological change’, Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102.
  • Romer, P. M. (1986), "Increasing returns and long-run growth," Journal of political economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
  • Rogers, E. (1962). ‘The Diffusion of Innovations’, N.Y.: Free Press of Glencoe.
  • Roco, Mihail C. (2011). ‘The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years’, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13(2), 427- 445.
  • Rip, A., and Nederhof, A. J. (1986). ‘Between dirigisme and laissez-faire: effects of implementing the science policy priority for biotechnology in the Netherlands’, Research Policy, 15, 253-268.
  • Rip, A., and Meulen, B. V. d. (1996). ‘The post-modern research system’, Science and Public Policy, 23, 343-352.
  • Rijsbergen, C. J. V. (1989). ‘Information Retrieval’, Buttersworth, London, second edition.
  • Price de Solla, D. J. (1963). ‘Little science, big science’, NY: Columbia UP.
  • Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of advanced nursing, 41(4), 376-382.
  • Pouris, A. (2012). ‘Technology Trends: A Review of Technologies and Policies. Institute for Technological Innovation’, Business Enterprises at University of Pretoria (Pty) Ltd, Pretoria, 61-62.
  • Portney, K. E. (1986). ‘Approaching public policy analysis: An introduction to policy and program research’, Prentice Hall.
  • Porter, A. L., and Detampel, M. J. (1995). ‘Technology opportunities analysis’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 49(3), 237-255.
  • Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Jin, X. Y., and Newman, N. C. (2002). ‘Measuring national ‘emerging technology’ capabilities’, Science and Public Policy, 29(3), 189-200.
  • Ponte, J.M. and Croft, W.B. (1998, August). ‘A language modeling approach to information retrieval’, In Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 275-281). ACM.
  • Pipino, L. L., Lee, Y. W., and Wang, R. Y. (2002). ‘Data quality assessment’, Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 211-218.
  • Pielke Jr., R. (2004). ‘What Future for the Policy Sciences?’, Policy Sciences, 37, 209-225.
  • Petkova, A. P., Wadhwa, A., Yao, X., and Jain, S. (2014). ‘Reputation and decision making under ambiguity: a study of US venture capital firms' investments in the emerging clean energy sector’, Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 422-448.
  • Peters, B. G. (2015). ‘Advanced introduction to public policy’, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Pereira, R. D. D. M., and Alvim, N. A. T. (2015). ‘Delphi technique in dialogue with nurses on acupuncture as a proposed nursing intervention’, Escola Anna Nery, 19(1), 174-180.
  • Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V. and Vanderplas, J. (2011). ‘Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python’, Journal of machine learning research, 12(Oct), pp.2825- 2830.
  • Patton, C., Sawicki, D. and Clark, J. (2015). ‘Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning--Pearson eText’, Routledge.
  • Parkhurst, J. (2017). The politics of evidence: from evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Taylor & Francis.
  • Parker, M., Acland, A., Armstrong, H. J., Bellingham, J. R., Bland, J., Bodmer, H. C., Burall, S., Castell, S., Chilvers, J., Cleevely, D. D. and Cope, D. (2014). ‘Identifying the science and technology dimensions of emerging public policy issues through horizon scanning’, PloS one, 9(5), e96480.
  • Papadopoullos, A. and Plante, P., SEMEON ANALYTICS INC. (2017). ‘Method and system for monitoring social media and analyzing text to automate classification of user posts using a facet based relevance assessment model’, U.S. Patent 9,715,493.
  • Pandza, K., Terry A. W., and Eva A. A. (2011). ‘Collaborative diversity in a nanotechnology innovation system: Evidence from the EU Framework Programme’, Technovation, 31(9), 476-489.
  • Palumbo, D. J. (1987). ‘The politics of program evaluation’, Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Pad , S., and Lapata, M. (2007). ‘Dependency-based construction of semantic space models’, Computational Linguistics, 33(2), 161-199.
  • O’connor, T. F., Lawrence, X. Y., and Lee, S. L. (2016). ‘Emerging technology: A key enabler for modernizing pharmaceutical manufacturing and advancing product quality’, International journal of pharmaceutics, 509(1-2), 492-498.
  • Ogbuokiri, B. O., Udanor, C. N., and Agu, M. N. (2015). ‘Implementing bigdata analytics for small and medium enterprise (SME) regional growth’, IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 17(6), 35-43.
  • Obermeyer, Z., and Emanuel, E. J. (2016). ‘Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine’, The New England journal of medicine, 375(13), 1216.
  • OECD (2015). ‘Data-Driven Innovation: Big Data for Growth and Well-Being’, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229358-en.
  • Niederberger, A. A. (2005). ‘Science for Climate change policy-making: applying theory to practice to enhance effectiveness’, Science and Public Policy, 32(1), 2-16.
  • Nguyen, T. H., Shirai, K. and Velcin, J. (2015). ‘Sentiment analysis on social media for stock movement prediction’, Expert Systems with Applications, 42(24), pp.9603-9611.
  • Nelson, R. R. (1959). ‘The economics of invention: A survey of the literature’, The Journal of Business, 32(2), 101-127.
  • Najafabadi, M. M., Villanustre, F., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Seliya, N., Wald, R., and Muharemagic, E. (2015). ‘Deep learning applications and challenges in big data analytics’, Journal of Big Data, 2(1), 1.
  • Nachmias, D., and Felbinger, C. (1982). ‘Utilization in the policy cycle: Directions for research’, Review of Policy Research, 2(2), 300-308.
  • NRF (n.d.). ‘Program Classification', Retrieved October, 3, 2018, from https://www.nrf.re.kr/eng/main.
  • Mythily, R., Banu, A. and Raghunathan, S. (2015). ‘Clustering models for data stream mining’, Procedia Computer Science, 46, pp.619-626.
  • Myers, D., Sumpter, C., Kirchhoff, B. and Walsh S. (2002). ‘A Practitioner’s View: Evolutionary Stages of Disruptive Technologies’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, 322–9.
  • Moro, A., Boelman, E., Joanny, G., and Garcia, J. L. (2018). ‘A bibliometric-based technique to identify emerging photovoltaic technologies in a comparative assessment with expert review’, Renewable Energy, 123, 407-416
  • Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G. and Dean, J. (2013). ‘Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.
  • Meyer, M. (2001). ‘Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology’, Scientometrics, 51(1), 163-183.
  • Metz, J. (2013). ‘Expert groups in the European Union: A sui generis phenomenon?’, Policy and Society, 32(3), 267-278.
  • Meijer, I. S., Hekkert, M. P., and Koppenjan, J. F. (2007). ‘The influence of perceived uncertainty on entrepreneurial action in emerging renewable energy technology; biomass gasification projects in the Netherlands’, Energy policy, 35(11), 5836-5854.
  • McCombs, M. E., and Shaw, D. L. (1972). ‘The agenda-setting function of mass media’, Public opinion quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
  • Massaroli, A., Martini, J. G., Lino, M. M., Spenassato, D., and Massaroli, R. (2017). ‘The Delphi Method as a Methodological Framework for Research in Nursing’, Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem, 26(4).
  • Martin, B. R. (2016). ‘Rand policy instruments–a critical review of what we do and don’t know’, Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 157-176
  • Martin, B. R. (1996). ‘Technology foresight: capturing the benefits from science-related technologies’, Research Evaluation, 6(2), 158-168.
  • Mansfield, E. (1961). ‘Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation’, Econometrica, 29(4):741–766
  • Manevitz, L. M. and Yousef, M. (2001). ‘One-class SVMs for document classification’, Journal of machine Learning research, 2(Dec), pp.139-154.
  • Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., and Peretto, P. (1997). ‘Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of innovation and international technological specialization’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(6), 801-826.
  • Lundvall, B.-A., and Borr s, S. (2005). ‘Science, technology and innovation policy’, In Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), ‘The Oxford Handbook of Innovation’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ludwig, B. (1997). Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology?, Journal of Extension, 35(5), 1–4.
  • Lorentzen, P. (2014). ‘China's strategic censorship’, American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 402-414.
  • Lluch, M. (2011). ‘Healthcare professionals’ organisational barriers to health information technologies—A literature review’, International journal of medical informatics, 80(12), 849-862.
  • Linstone, H. A., and Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). ‘The delphi method' (pp. 3-12), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Levary, R. R., and Han, D. (1995). ‘Choosing a technological forecasting method’, Industrial Management, 37(1), 14.
  • Lester, J. P. and Stewart, J. (2000). ‘Public Policy: An Evolutionary Approach’, California: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
  • Le, Q. and Mikolov, T. (2014, January). ‘Distributed representations of sentences and documents’, In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1188-1196).
  • Le n, G. (2001). ‘The prioritisation process in science and technology: lessons learned in the definition of the Spanish National R&D Plan’, Science Policy-Setting the Agenda for Research, 41-51. (p.14)
  • Layne, K., and Lee, J. (2001). ‘Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model’, Government information quarterly, 18(2), 122-136.
  • Lasswell, H. D. (1956). ‘The decision process: Seven categories of functional analysis’, Bureau of Governmental Research, College of Business and Public Administration, University of Maryland.
  • Lar do, P., K hler, C., and Rammer, C. (2016). ‘The impact of fiscal incentives for R&D’, In ‘Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact’, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, 18-53.
  • LaValle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. S., and Kruschwitz, N. (2011). ‘Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value’, MIT Sloan management review, 52(2), 21.
  • Kumar, A., Nguyen, V. A., and Teo, K. M. (2014). ‘Commuter cycling policy in Singapore: a farecard data analytics based approach’, Annals of Operations Research, 236(1), 57- 73.
  • Kreuchauff, F., and Korzinov, V. (2017). ‘A patent search strategy based on machine learning for the emerging field of service robotics’, Scientometrics, 111(2), 743-772.
  • Kraft, M. E., and Furlong, S. R. (2012). ‘Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives’. Cq Press.
  • Kowalski, G. ‘Information Retrieval Systems? Theory and Implementation’, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
  • Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I., and Pintelas, P. (2007). Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Emerging artificial intelligence applications in computer engineering, 160, 3–24.
  • Kooper, M. N., Maes, R., and Lindgreen, E. R. (2011). ‘On the governance of information: Introducing a new concept of governance to support the management of information’, International Journal of Information Management, 31(3), 195-200.
  • Kodinariya, T. M. and Makwana, P. R. (2013). ‘Review on determining number of Cluster in K-Means Clustering’, International Journal, 1(6), pp.90-95.
  • Klievink, B., Romijn, B. J., Cunningham, S., and de Bruijn, H. (2017). ‘Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness’, Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 267- 283.
  • Klavans, R., and Boyack, K. W. (2017b). ‘Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge?’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 984-998.
  • Klavans, R., and Boyack, K. W. (2017a). ‘Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence’, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1158-1174.
  • Kiran, G. V. R., Shankar, R. and Pudi, V. (2010, September). ‘Frequent itemset based hierarchical document clustering using Wikipedia as external knowledge’, In International Conference on Knowledge-based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (pp. 11-20). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). ‘Agendas, alternatives, and public policies’, Boston: Little, Brown.
  • King, G., Pan, J., and Roberts, M. E. (2013). ‘How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression’, American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326-343.
  • Kima, J., Yoonb, J., Parkc, E. and Choia, S. (2018). ‘Patent Document Clustering Using Deep Embeddings’, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325251122_Patent_ Document_Clustering_ with_Deep_Embeddings/stats
  • Kim, Y. G., Suh, J. H., and Park, S. C. (2008). ‘Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology’, Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1804-1812.
  • Kim, J., Hwang, M., Jeong, D. H. and Jung, H. (2012). ‘Technology trends analysis and forecasting application based on decision tree and statistical feature analysis’, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(16), 12618-12625.
  • Kim, G. H., Trimi, S., and Chung, J. H. (2014). ‘Big-data applications in the government sector’, Communications of the ACM, 57(3), 78-85.
  • Khatri, V., and Brown, C. V. (2010). ‘Designing data governance’, Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148-152.
  • Ketchen, D. J., and Shook, C. L. (1996). ‘The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique’, Strategic management journal, 17(6), 441-458.
  • Ketchen, D. J. and Shook, C. L. (1996). ‘The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique’, Strategic management journal, 17(6), pp.441-458.
  • Kerr, K., Norris, T., and Stockdale, R. (2007). ‘Data quality information and decision making: a healthcare case study’. ACIS 2007 Proceedings, 98.
  • Keenan, M. (2003). ‘Identifying emerging generic technologies at the national level: the UK experience’, Journal of Forecasting, 22(2‐3), 129-160.
  • Kayyali, B., Knott, D., and Van Kuiken, S. (2013). ‘The big-data revolution in US health care: Accelerating value and innovation’, Mc Kinsey & Company, 2(8), 1-13.
  • Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P.J., 2009. Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis (Vol. 344). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Karki, M. M. S. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272.
  • Kang, D., Jang, W., Lee, H., and No, H. J. (2013). ‘A review on technology forecasting methods and their application area’, Development, 9, 212-233.
  • Kajikawa, Y. (2008). ‘Research core and framework of sustainability science’, Sustainability Science, 3(2), 215-239.
  • Kaebnick, G. E. and Gusmano, M. K. (2018). ‘Making Policies about Emerging Technologies’, Hastings Center Report, 48, S2-S11.
  • Kadhim, A. I., Cheah, Y. N. and Ahamed, N. H. (2014, December). ‘Text document preprocessing and dimension reduction techniques for text document clustering’, In Artificial Intelligence with Applications in Engineering and Technology (ICAIET), 2014 4th International Conference on (pp. 69-73). IEEE.
  • Jun, S., Park, S.S., and Jang, D.S. (2012). ‘Technology forecasting using matrix map and patent clustering’, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112, 786-807
  • Johannessen, J., Olsen, B., and Lumpkin, G. T. (2001). ‘Innovation as newness: what is new, how new, and new to whom?’, European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20–31.
  • Jenkins, W. I. (1978). ‘Policy Analysis: A Political and Organizational Perspective’, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press
  • Jaskowiak, P. A., and Campello, R. J. G. B. (2011, August). ‘Comparing correlation coefficients as dissimilarity measures for cancer classification in gene expression data’, In Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Bioinformatics (pp. 1-8). Bras lia.
  • Irvine, J., and Martin, B. R. (1984), ‘Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners’, Brighton: Pinter
  • Hung, S. C., and Chu, Y. Y. (2006). ‘Stimulating new industries from emerging technologies: challenges for the public sector’, Technovation, 26(1), 104-110.
  • Hsu, C., and Sandford, B. A. (2007). ‘The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus’, Practical assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.
  • Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. (1995). ‘Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems’, Toronto: Oxford University Press.
  • Hough, M., Jackson, J., and Bradford, B. (2013). ‘Legitimacy, trust and compliance: An empirical test of procedural justice theory using the European Social Survey’, In Tankebe, J. and Liebling, A. (eds.) ‘Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hood, W., and Wilson, C. (2001). ‘The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics’, Scientometrics, 52(2), 291-314.
  • Hogwood, B. W., Gunn, L. A., and Archibald, S. (1984). ‘Policy analysis for the real world’ (Vol. 69), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hill, C. W., and Rothaermel, F. T.(2003),“The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation,”Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257-274.
  • Henriques, L., and Lar do, P. (2013). ‘Policy-making in science policy: The ‘OECD model’ unveiled’, Research Policy, 42(3), 801-816.
  • Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., and Smits, R. E. (2007). ‘Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change’, Technological forecasting and social change, 74(4), 413-432.
  • Hawkins, B., and Parkhurst, J. (2016). ‘The ‘good governance’ of evidence in health policy’, Evidence & policy: a journal of research, debate and practice, 12(4), 575-592.
  • Hauknes, J., and Nordgren, L. (1999). ‘Economic rationales of government involvement in innovation and the supply of innovation-related services’, STEP Report, R-08.
  • Hashem, I. A. T., Chang, V., Anuar, N. B., Adewole, K., Yaqoob, I., Gani, A., Ahmed, E. and Chiroma, H. (2016). ‘The role of big data in smart city’, International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), pp.748-758.
  • Harris, Z. S. (1954). Distributional structure. Word, 10(2-3): 146-162.
  • Harris, S. (2014). ‘The social laboratory’, Foreign Policy, 207, 64.
  • Harper, J. C. (2016). 16. ‘The impact of technology foresight on innovation and innovation policy’. Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, 483.
  • Hanekom, S. X. (1987). ‘Public policy: Framework and instrument for action’, MacMillan South Africa.
  • Hanafin, S. (2004). ‘Review of literature on the Delphi Technique’, Dublin: National Children’s Office.
  • Han, J., Pei, J. and Kamber, M. (2011). ‘Data mining: concepts and techniques’, Elsevier.
  • Han, E. H. S. and Karypis, G. (2000, September). ‘Centroid-based document classification: Analysis and experimental results’, In European conference on principles of data mining and knowledge discovery (pp. 424-431). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Hall, J., Matos, S., Silvestre, B., and Martin, M. (2011). ‘Managing technological and social uncertainties of innovation: the evolution of Brazilian energy and agriculture’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(7), 1147-1157.
  • Halaweh, M. (2013). ‘Emerging technology: What is it’, Journal of technology management & innovation, 8(3), 108-115.
  • Haas, P. (2004), ‘When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process’, Journal of European public policy, 11(4), 569-592.
  • H chtl, J., Parycek, P., and Sch llhammer, R. (2016). ‘Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era’, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1-2), 147-169.
  • Gupta, M. P., and Jana, D. (2003). ‘E-government evaluation: A framework and case study’, Government information quarterly, 20(4), 365-387.
  • Grossmann, Matt. ‘Interest group influence on US policy change: An assessment based on policy history’, Interest Groups and Advocacy 1, no. 2 (2012): 171-192.
  • Groen, A. J., and Walsh, S. T. (2013). ‘Introduction to the field of emerging technology management’, Creativity and innovation management, 22(1), 1-5.
  • Goldstein, J. (1999). ‘Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence’, 1(1), 49- 72.
  • Goldsmith, S., and Crawford, S. (2014). ‘The responsive city: Engaging communities through data-smart governance’, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Godin, B. (2007). ‘Science, accounting and statistics: The input–output framework’, Research Policy, 36, 670-690.
  • Goasdou , V., Nugier, S., Duquennoy, D., and Laboisse, B. (2007). ‘An Evaluation Framework For Data Quality Tools’, In ICIQ (pp. 280-294).
  • Giest, S. (2017). ‘Big Data for Policymaking: Fad or Fasttrack?’, Policy Sciences, 50(3), 367–382.
  • George, G., Haas, M. R., and Pentland, A. (2014). ‘Big data and management’, N.Y.: Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor.
  • Fung, B. C., Wang, K. and Ester, M. (2003, May). ‘Hierarchical document clustering using frequent itemsets’, In Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM international conference on data mining (pp. 59-70). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  • Friedrich, C. J. (1963). ‘Man and his government: An empirical theory of politics’, McGraw-Hill.
  • French, S., Maule, J., and Papamichail, N. (2009). ‘Decision behaviour, analysis and support’, Cambridge University Press.
  • Freeman, R. B. (2011). ‘The economics of science and technology policy’, In ‘The Science of Science Policy: A Handbook’, ed. Kay Husbands Fealing, Julia I. Lane, John H. Marburger III, and Stephanie Shipp, 85-103. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Firth, J.R. (1957). ‘A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-1955', Studies in Linguistic Analysis’, Oxford: Philological Society: 1–32. Reprinted in F.R. Palmer, ed. (1968). Selected Papers of J.R. Firth 1952-1959. London: Longman.
  • Firat, Ayse Kaya, Wei Lee Woon, and Stuart Madnick. (2008). ‘Technological forecasting–A review’, Composite Information Systems Laboratory (CISL), Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Fenn, J., and LeHong, H. (2011). ‘Hype cycle for emerging technologies’, Gartner, July.
  • Felici, M., Koulouris, T., and Pearson, S. (2013, December). ‘Accountability for data governance in cloud ecosystems’, In Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 327-332). IEEE.
  • Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., and Pappas, G. (2008). ‘Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses’, The FASEB journal, 22(2), 338-342.
  • Everett, S. (2003). ‘The policy cycle: democratic process or rational paradigm revisited?’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(2), 65-70.
  • Elzinga, A., and Jamison, A. (1995). ‘Changing Policy Agendas in Science and Technology’, in: Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C., Pinch, T. (Eds.), ‘Handbook of Science and Technology Studies’, Sage, London, 572-597.
  • Edwards, M., Howard, C., and Miller, R. (2001). ‘Social policy, public policy: from problems to practice’, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  • Edquist, C. (1997). ‘Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations’, London: Pinter Publishers/Cassell Academic.
  • Edler, J. and Fagerberg, J. (2017). ‘Innovation policy: What, why, and how’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), pp.2-23
  • Easton, D. A. (1965). ‘System Analysis of Political Life’, Willey, New York.
  • Dye, T. R. (1972). ‘Understanding Public Policy’, Englewood Cliffs: PrenticeHall.
  • Dunn, W. N. (2015). ‘Public policy analysis’, Routledge.
  • Dransfeld, H., Pemberton, J., and Jacobs, G. (2000). ‘Quantifying weighted expert opinion: the future of interactive television and retailing’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 63(1), 81-90.
  • Dodd, J. D. and Michelle, H. B. (2000). ‘Capacity Building-Linking Community Experience to Public Policy, Population and Public Health Branch’, Atlantic Regional Office, Health Canada, Halifax.
  • Dimitrakopoulos, D. G. (2005). ‘Norms, interests and institutional change’, Political studies, 53(4), 676-693.
  • Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., and Gustafson, D. H. (1975). ‘Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes’ (pp. 83-107), Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
  • DeLeon, P. (1999). ‘The Stages Approach to the Policy Process: What Has It Done? Where Is It Going?’ In: Sabatier P. (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. University California, Davis.
  • De Smedt, P. (2008). ‘Strategic intelligence in decision making’. In ‘Future-Oriented Technology Analysis’ (pp. 89-102). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • De Graaf, B., Kan, A. R., Molenaar, H. (2017). ‘The Dutch National Research Agenda in Perspective - A Reflection on Research and Science Policy in Practice’, Amsterdam University Press.
  • Day, G. S., and Schoemaker, P. J. (2000). ‘Avoiding the pitfalls of emerging technologies’, California management review, 42(2), 8-33.
  • Davies, D. L. and Bouldin, D. W. (1979). ‘A cluster separation measure’, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, (2), pp.224-227.
  • Das, A., Roy, S. and Bhattacharya, U. (2018). ‘Document Image Classification with Intra- Domain Transfer Learning and Stacked Generalization of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.09321.
  • Das, A. K. (2015). ‘Research evaluation metrics (Vol. 4)’. UNESCO Publishing.
  • Daneke, G. A., and Steiss, A. W. (1978). ‘Planning and policy analysis for public administrators’, in ‘Management Handbook for Public Administrators’, N.Y.: Van Nostrand and Reinhold Company.
  • Dale, R. (2000). ‘Symbolic approaches to natural language processing’. Handbook of Natural Language Processing, pp.1-9.
  • Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., and Gerdsri, P. (2006). ‘Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981-1012.
  • Daft, R.L. and Becker, S.W. (1978). ‘The Innovative Organization’, N.Y.: Elsevier, New York.
  • D rre, J., Gerstl, P., and Seiffert, R. (1999, August). ‘Text mining: finding nuggets in mountains of textual data’, In Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 398-401). ACM.
  • Curtin, D., and Meijer, A. J. (2006). ‘Does transparency strengthen legitimacy?’, Information polity, 11(2), 109-122.
  • Cozzens, S., Gatchair, S., Kang, J., Kim, K. S., Lee, H. J., Ord ez, G. and Porter, A. (2010). ‘Emerging technologies: quantitative identification and measurement’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(3), 361-376.
  • Cochran, C. L., and Malone, E. F. (2005). ‘Public policy: Perspectives and choices’, Lynne Rienner.
  • Cochran, C. E. (2003). ‘American Public Policy: An Introduction (7th ed.)’, N.Y.: Wadsworth.
  • Clemen, R. T., and Reilly, T. (2013). ‘Making hard decisions with DecisionTools’, Cengage Learning.
  • Choi, M. and Choi, H. L. (2015). ‘Foresight for science and technology priority setting in Korea’, Форсайт, 9(3 (eng)).
  • Chengalur-Smith, I. N., Ballou, D. P., and Pazer, H. L. (1999). ‘The impact of data quality information on decision making: An exploratory analysis’, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 11(6), 853-864.
  • Chen, H., Roco, M. C., Son, J., Jiang, S., Larson, C. A., and Gao, Q. (2013). ‘Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and effect of NSF funding’, Journal of nanoparticle research, 15(9), 1951.
  • Chen, C. P., and Zhang, C. Y. (2014). ‘Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on Big Data’, Information Sciences, 275, 314-347.
  • Chen, C. L., Tseng, F. S. and Liang, T. (2011). ‘An integration of fuzzy association rules and WordNet for document clustering’, Knowledge and information systems, 28(3), pp.687-708.
  • Chen, C. L., Tseng, F. S. and Liang, T. (2010). ‘An integration of WordNet and fuzzy association rule mining for multi-label document clustering’, Data & Knowledge Engineering, 69(11), pp.1208-1226.
  • Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V. and Niknafs, A. (2012). ‘NbClust Package: finding the relevant number of clusters in a dataset’, UseR! 2012.
  • Chang, W. L., Tay, K. M. and Lim, C. P. (2017). ‘A new evolving tree-based model with local re-learning for document clustering and visualization’, Neural Processing Letters, 46(2), pp.379-409.
  • Cefis, E., and Orsenigo, L. (2001). ‘The persistence of innovative activities: A crosscountries and cross-sectors comparative analysis’, Research Policy, 30(7), 1139-1158.
  • Castro, D., New, J., and Wu, J. (2017). ‘The Best States for Data Innovation’, Center for Data Innovation, 1-84.
  • Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., J ger. J. and Mitchell, R. B. (2003). ‘Knowledge systems for sustainable development’, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 100(14), 8086-8091.
  • Carrocher, N., Malerba, F., and Montobbio, F. (2003). ‘The emergence of new technologies in the ICT field: main actors, geographical distribution, and knowledge sources’, Working Papers of Faculty of Economics Universit degli Studi dell’Insubria, 37 Varese, Italy
  • Cagala, T., and Bundesbank, D. (2017). ‘Improving data quality and closing data gaps with machine learning’, IFC Bulletins chapters, 46.
  • Butz, P., and Tauscher, B. (2002). ‘Emerging technologies: chemical aspects’, Food research international, 35(2-3), 279-284.
  • Buckley, C. and Lewit, A. F. (1985, June). ‘Optimization of inverted vector searches’, In Proceedings of the 8th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 97-110). ACM.
  • Brusoni, S., and Geuna, A. (2003). ‘An international comparison of sectoral knowledge bases: persistence and integration in the pharmaceutical industry’, Research Policy, 32(10), 1897-1912.
  • Brooks, S. (1989). ‘Public policy in Canada: An introduction’, McClelland & Stewart Limited.
  • Brockmeier, A. J., Mu, T., Ananiadou, S. and Goulermas, J. Y. (2018). ‘Self-Tuned Descriptive Document Clustering using a Predictive Network’, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
  • Bridgman, P., and Davis, G. (2003). ‘What use is a policy cycle? Plenty, if the aim is clear’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(3), 98-102.
  • Braun, D. (1998). ‘The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science’, Research Policy, 27, 807-821.
  • Branscomb, L. M. (1992). ‘America's emerging technology policy’, Minerva, 30(3), 317- 336.
  • Brain S. (1974). ‘Public Policy Processes’, McGraw-Hill, New York, p.79.
  • Bowles, N. (1999), ‘The Delphi technique’, Nursing standard 13(45).
  • Bornmann, L., and Leydesdorff, L. (2014). ‘Scientometrics in a changing research landscape: bibliometrics has become an integral part of research quality evaluation and has been changing the practice of research’. EMBO reports, 15(12), 1228-1232.
  • Boon, W., and Moors, E. (2008). ‘Exploring emerging technologies using metaphors–a study of orphan drugs and pharmacogenomics’, Social science & medicine, 66(9), 1915- 1927.
  • Blackburn, M., Alexander, J., Legan, J. D., and Klabjan, D. (2017). ‘Big Data and the Future of R&D Management: The rise of big data and big data analytics will have significant implications for R&D and innovation management in the next decade’, Research-Technology Management, 60(5), 43-51.
  • Birkland, T. A. (2015). ‘An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making’, Routledge.
  • Beil, F., Ester, M. and Xu, X. (2002, July). ‘Frequent term-based text clustering’, In Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 436-442). ACM.
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). Sage.
  • Baumann, J., and Kritikos, A. S. (2016). ‘The link between R&D, innovation and productivity: Are micro firms different?’, Research Policy, 45(6), 1263-1274.
  • Bates, D. L and Elgdredge, D. L. (1980). ‘Strategy and policy: Analysis, formulation, and implementation', Dubuque: W.C. Brown Company Publishers.
  • Avella, J. R. (2016). ‘Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges’, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11(1), 305-321.
  • Audretsch, D. B., Bozeman, B., Combs, K. L., Feldman, M., Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., Stephan, P., Tassey, G., and Wessner, C. (2002). ‘The economics of science and technology’, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(2), 155-203.
  • Aucoin, P. (1973). ‘Theory and research in the study of policy making’, In: G.B. Doern and P. Aucoin (Ed.): The Structure of Policy Making in Canada. Toronto: Macmillan Company of Canada.
  • Arrow, K. J. (1972). ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention’, In Readings in Industrial Economics (pp. 219-236). London: Palgrave.
  • Arora, S. K., Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., and Shapira, P. (2013). ‘Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs’, Scientometrics, 95(1), 351-370.
  • Aringhieri, R., Carello, G., and Morale, D. (2016). ‘Supporting decision making to improve the performance of an Italian Emergency Medical Service', Annals of Operations Research, 236(1), 131-148.
  • Ansip (2017). ‘Future and emerging technologies: investing in Europe's future, improving people's lives', European Commision, Blog Post, Retrieved October, 3, 2018, from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/ansip/blog/future-andemerging- technologies-investing-europes-future-improving-peoples-lives_en.
  • Anderson, J. E. (Ed.) (1976). ‘Cases in Public Policy-Making', New York: Praeger.
  • Altman, N. S. (1992). ‘An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression', The American Statistician, 46(3), 175-185.
  • Alexander, J., Chase, J., Newman, N., Porter, A., and Roessner, J. D. (2012, July). ‘Emergence as a conceptual framework for understanding scientific and technological progress’, In Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET), 2012 Proceedings of PICMET'12: (pp. 1286-1292), IEEE.
  • Al Nuaimi, E., Al Neyadi, H., Mohamed, N. and Al-Jaroodi, J. (2015). ‘Applications of big data to smart cities’, Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 6(1), p.25.
  • Akindele, S. T., and Olaopa, O. R. (2004). ‘A theoretical review of core issues on public policy and its environment’, Journal of Human Ecology, 16(3), 173-180.
  • Agarwal, R., and Dhar, V. (2014). ‘Big data, data science, and analytics: The opportunity and challenge for IS research’, Information Systems Research, 25(3), 443–448.
  • Agarwal, N. (2018). Emerging Research Challenges and Opportunities in Computational Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer.
  • Adler, M., and Ziglio, E. (1996). ‘Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health’, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.