Williams H., Spencer K., Sanders C., Lund D., Whitley E. A., Kaye J. and Dixon W. G., Dynamic Consent: A possible solution to improve patient confidence and trust in how electronic patient records are used in medical research, JMIR Medicla Informatics , Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015.
Weng S.F.,, Reps J., Kai J., Garibaldi J.M., Qureshi N., Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?, PLOS ONE , Vol. 12, No. 4, 2017.
Wee R., Dynamic consent in the digital age of biology, J Prim Health Care, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2013.
UK Department of Health, Report on the Review of Patient-Identifiable Information, 1997.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office for Civil Rights(OCR), Guidance Regarding Methods for De-identification of Protected Health Information in Accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule) , 2012.
U.K. Information Commissioner's Office, Anonymisation: managing data protection risk code of practice, 2012.
Steinsbekk K.S., Myskja B.K., Solber B., Broad consent versus dynamic consent in bioback research: Is passive participation an ethical problem?, Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers , Vol.17, 2013.
Stein D.T., Terry S.F., Reforming Biobank Consent Policy: A Necessary Move from Broad Consent Toward Dynamic Consent, Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers , Vol.17, 2013.
Simson L. Garfinkel, De-identification of Personal Information, National Institue of Standards and Technology , NISTIR 8053, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2015.
Sheehan M., Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent?, Public Health Ethics , Vol. 4, No. 3, 2011.
Samuel Warren & Louis Brandeis, The Right to Privacy, 4 Harvard Law Review 193, 1890.
Rajkomar A. et al., Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records, npj Digital Medinice, Vol. 1, No. 18, 2018.
Petrini C., "Broad" consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose, Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 70, 2010.
Paul M. Schwarz & Daniel J. Solve, The PII Problem: Privacy and A New Concept of Personally Identifiable information, 86 NYU L. Rev . 2011.
Paul M. Schwartz, Internet Privacy and the State, Connecticut Law Review , Vol. 32, Issue 3, 2000.
Paul M. Schwartz & Daniel J. Solove, Reconciling Personal Information in the United States and European Union, 102 CAL. L. REV . 877, 2014,
OCED, Recommendation of the OECD Council on Health Data Governance, 2017.
OCED, Health Data Governance: Privacy, Monitoring and Research , 2015.
Kaye J., Whitley E.A., Lund D., Morrison M., Teare H., & Melhan K., Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks, European Journal of Human Genetics , Vol. 23, No. 2, 2015.
Kaufman D.J. et al., A Survey of U.S Adults’ Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Study of Genes and Environment, 2016.
Kate J., Embedding biobanks as tools for personalised medicine, Norsk Epidemiology , Vol. 21, No. 2, 2012.
Jennifer S. Geetter, Coding for Change: The Power of the Human Genome to Transfer the American Health Insurance System, 28 American Joural of Law & Medicine 1, 2002.
Hofmann B., Broadening consent-and diluting ethics?, Journal of Medical Ethics , No.35, 2009.
Helgesson G., Bypassing Consent for Research on Biological Material, Nature Biotechnology , Vol. 26, No. 9, 2008.
Hedley A., Privacy as a Factor in Residential Buildings and Site Development: An Annotated Bibliography, Bibliography Vol. 32, National Research Council of Canada, 1966.
Hansson M.G., Dillner J., Bartram C.R., Carlson J.A. & Helgesson G., Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank reaserch?, Lancet Oncol , vol. 7, 2006.
Guadamuz A., Habeas Data: The Latin-American Response to Data Protection, Journal Information Law & Technology , 2000(2).
Gonz lez M.T., Habeas Data: Comparative Constitutional Interventions from Latin America Against Neoliberal States of Insecurity and Surveillance, Chicago-Kent Law Review , Vol. 90, No. 2, 2015.
Francis S. Chlapowski, The Constitutional Protection of Informational Privacy, 71 Boston University Law Review 133, 1991.
Fair Trade Commission, Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: A Proposed Framework for Business and Policymaker , 2010.10,
FTC, Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change , 2012.
European Union Agency For Network And Information Security, Privacy by design in big data: An overview of privacy enhancing technologies in the era of big data analytics , 2015.
Elmar Mand, Datenshutz in medizinnetzen , MedR 2003.
El Emam, K & Alvarez, C., A critical appraisal of the Article 29 Working Party Opinion 05/2014 on data anonymization techniques, International Data Privacy Law Vol. 5, No. 1, 2015.
EDPS Opinion 7/2015, Meeting the challenges of big data: A call for Transparency, user control, data protection by design and accountability, European Data Protection Supervisor, 19 November 2015.
Department of Health, The power of information: Putting all of us in control of the health and care information we need , 2012.
Daniel J. Solove, Privacy and Power: Computer Databases and Metaphors for Information Privacy, Stanford Law Review , Vol. 53, 2001.
Daniel J. Solove & Marc Rotenberg, Information Privacy Law , Aspen, 2003.
Coppen et al., Will the trilogue on the EU Data Protection Regulation recognise the importance of health research?, European Journal of Public Health , Vol. 25, No. 5, 2015.
Congress of U.S, Office of Technology Assessment, Genetic Monitoring and Screening in the Workplace , 1990,
Clarke R., Profiling: A Hidden Challenge to the Regulation of Data Surveillance, 4(2) the Journal of Law and Information Science 403, 1993.
C. Burton et al, The Final European Union General Data Protection Regulation, BNA Privacy & Security Law Report , Bloomberg BNA, The Bureau of National Affairs, 2016.
Biobanking Staff, Broad Consent Versus Dynamic Consent: Pros And Cons For Biobanks To Consider, European Journal of Human Genetics , Vol. 21, 2014.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Working Document on the processing of personal data relating to health in electronic health records(EHR), February 2007.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Working Document on Genetic Data, 17 March 2004.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data, 2007,
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques, April 2014.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Guidelines on the right to data portability, April 2017.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Guidelines on Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) and determining whether processing is “likely to result in a high risk” for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679, April 2017.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Guidelines on Consent under Regulation 2016/679, 28 November 2017.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679, October 2017.
Ann Cavoukian, Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles, Information and Privacy Commissioner, Ontario, Canada, 2011.
Ann Cavoukian Angus Fisher Scott Killen David A. Hoffman, Remote home health care technologies: how to ensure privacy? Built it in: Privacy by Design, Identity in the Information Society, Vol. 3 Issue 2., Springer, 2010.