박사

언캐니밸리 현상에 대한 전기생리학적 이해

김대규 2019년
논문상세정보
' 언캐니밸리 현상에 대한 전기생리학적 이해' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • erp
  • n250
  • oddball 과제
  • p3
  • 언캐니밸리
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
217 0

0.0%

' 언캐니밸리 현상에 대한 전기생리학적 이해' 의 참고문헌

  • 이세돌이 이제 '알파고'를 이길 수 없다 고 말했다.
    허핑턴포스트코리아 https://www.huffingtonpost.kr/ 2017/01/10/story_n_14068188.html [2017]
  • 시각적 탐색에서 표적에 의해 유발된 N2pc 성분의 특성 및 측정
    현주석 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 20(4), 247-263 [2008]
  • 시각작업기억과 지각입력 간 비교 처리 과정에서의 선별적 변화 탐지의 특성
    현주석 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 21(3), 147-166 [2009]
  • 사건관련전위 관찰 에 기초한 언캐니 밸리 현상에 대한 탐색적 이해
  • “영상 패러다임 바꾼 <아바타>의 일등공신, 오토데스 크 3D 기술”
    손재철 경향닷컴, 검색일 2018. 11. 14. 출처:http://biz.khan.co. kr/khan_art_view.html?artid=201003111833092&code=930100 [2010]
  • “IBM AI 왓슨의 비즈니스 활용사례 대방출”
    임민철 ZDNet Korea, 검색일 2018. 11. 1. 출처: http://www.zdnet.co.kr/news/ news_view.asp?artice_id=20171113135224 [2017]
  • Yamada, Y., Kawabe, T., & Ihaya, K. (2013). Categorization difficulty is associated with negative evaluation in the “uncanny valley” phenomenon. Japanese Psychological Research, 55(1), 20-32.
  • WEF (World Economic Forum). (2014). The global competitiveness report 2014–2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  • Uncanny Valley 가설에 대한 실험적 접근
    장필식 대한인간공학회 지, 26(1), 47-53 [2007]
  • Tondu, B., & Bardou, N. (2011). A new interpretation of Mori’s uncanny valley for future humanoid robots. International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 26(3), 337–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.2316/Journal.206. 2011.3.206-3348.
  • Tinwell, A., Grimshaw, M., Nabi, D. A., & Williams, A. (2011). Facial expression of emotion and perception of the Uncanny Valley in virtual characters. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 741-749.
  • Tinwell, A., Grimshaw, M., & Williams, A. (2010). Uncanny behaviour in survival horror games. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 2(1), 3-25.
  • Tinwell, A., & Grimshaw, M. (2009, September). Bridging the uncanny: an impossible traverse?. In Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era (pp. 66-73). ACM.
  • Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A. L., & Collins, D. (2006). Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(9), 1488-1497.
  • Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 46(2), 225-245.
  • Steckenfinger, S. A., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2009). Monkey visual behavior falls into the uncanny valley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pnas-0910063106.
  • Seyama, J. i., & Nagayama, R. S. (2007). The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 16(4), 337-351.
  • Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Jentzsch, I., Burton, A. M. & Kaufmann, J. M. (2002). Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(3), 398-409.
  • Schweinberger, S. R., Huddy, V., & Burton, A. M. (2004). N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions. Neuroreport, 15(9), 1501-1505. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000131675.00319.42
  • Schweinberger, S. R., & Burton, A. M. (2003). Covert recognition and the neural system for face processing. Cortex, 39(1), 9-30.
  • Rosenfeld, J. P., Cantwell, B., Nasman, V. T., Wojdac, V., Ivanov, S., & Mazzeri, L. (1988). A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test. International Journal of Neuroscience, 42(1-2), 157-161.
  • Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128-2148.
  • Ninomiya, H., Onitsuka, T., Chen, C. H., Sato, E., & Tashiro, N. (1998). P300 in response to the subject's own face. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 52(5), 519-522.
  • Nie, A., Ye, J., & Li, M. (2016). The effect of pre-existing memory representations on repetition-related N250r and N400. Science Bulletin, 61(4), 265-275.
  • Neri, P., Morrone, M. C., & Burr, D. C. (1998). Seeing biological motion. Nature, 395(6705), 894.
  • Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F., & Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98-100.
  • Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33–35.
  • Mathur, M. B., & Reichling, D. B. (2016). Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley. Cognition, 146, 22-32.
  • MacDorman, K. F., & Chattopadhyay, D. (2017). Categorization-based stranger avoidance does not explain the uncanny valley effect. Cognition, 161, 132-135.
  • MacDorman, K. F., & Chattopadhyay, D. (2016). Reducing consistency in human realism increases the uncanny valley effect; increasing category uncertainty does not. Cognition, 146, 190-205.
  • MacDorman, K. F. (2006). Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: an exploration of the uncanny valley. Paper presented at the ICCS/CogSci-2006 Long Symposium: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, Vancouver.
  • Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT press.
  • Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(4), 476-490.
  • Lewkowicz, D. J., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2012). The development of the uncanny valley in infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 54(2), 124-132.
  • Keegan, R. W. (2009). The futurist: The life and films of James Cameron. Random House of Canada.
  • K tsyri, J., F rger, K., M k r inen, M., & Takala, T. (2015). A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 390.
  • Jeffreys, D. A. (1996). Evoked potential studies of face and object processing. Visual Cognition, 3(1), 1-38.
  • Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.
  • Ikeda, T., Hirata, M., Kasaki, M., Alimardani, M., Matsushita, K., Yamamoto, T., Nishio, S. & Ishiguro, H. (2017). Subthalamic nucleus detects unnatural android movement. Scientific Report, 7(1), 17851.
  • Harris, R. J., Young, A. W., &Andrews, T. J. (2014). Brain regions involved in processing facial identity and expression are differentially selective for surface and edge information. NeuroImage, 97, 217-223.
  • Hanson, D. (2006, July). Exploring the aesthetic range for humanoid robots. In Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science (pp. 39-42). Citeseer.
  • Gliga, T., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2005). Structural encoding of body and face in human infants and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1328-1340.
  • Geller, T. (2008). Overcoming the uncanny valley. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28(4).
  • Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature neuroscience, 2(6), 568.
  • Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3(2), 191.
  • Feuerriegel, D., Churches, O., Hofmann, J., & Keage, H. A. (2015). The N170 and face perception in psychiatric and neurological disorders: a systematic review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126(6), 1141-1158.
  • Ferrey, A. E., Burleigh, T. J., & Fenske, M. J. (2015). Stimulus-category competition, inhibition, and affective devaluation: a novel account of the uncanny valley. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 249. doi:10.3389/ fpsyg.2015.00249
  • Ferber, D. (2003). The man who mistook his girlfriend for a robot. Popular Science, 236, 60.
  • Eimer, M. (2000). The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. Neuroreport, 11(10), 2319-2324.
  • Daz3D. (2017, October) title : Victoria, Genesis and the Uncanny Valley, Retrieved from https://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/202151/ victoria-genesis-and-the-uncanny-valley
  • Churches, O., Baron-Cohen, S., & Ring, H. (2009). Seeing face-like objects: an event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 20(14), 1290-1294. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283305a65
  • Cheetham, M., Suter, P., & J ncke, L. (2011). The human likeness dimension of the “uncanny valley hypothesis”: behavioral and functional MRI findings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 126.
  • Campanella, S., Gaspard, C., Debatisse, D., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., & Guerit, J. M. (2002). Discrimination of emotional facial expressions in a visual oddball task: an ERP study. Biological Psychology, 59(3), 171-186.
  • Caharel, S., Leleu, A., Bernard, C., Viggiano, M. P., Lalonde, R., & Reba , M. (2013). Early holistic face-like processing of Arcimboldo paintings in the right occipito-temporal cortex: evidence from the N170 ERP component. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 90(2), 157-164.
  • CNBC. (2016, March, 16) title : This hot robot says she wants to destroy humans Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/video/2016/03/16/this-hot -robot-says-she-wants-to-destroy-humans.html
  • CG 영화의 흥행성과 언캐니 밸리 현상의 유의미한 관련성 연구
    김남훈 Journal of Integrated Design Research, 12(1), 9-22 [2013]
  • Burleigh, T. J., Schoenherr, J. R., & Lacroix, G. L. (2013). Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 759-771.
  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
  • Bindemann, M., Burton, A. M., Leuthold, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2008). Brain potential correlates of face recognition: Geometric distortions and the N250r brain response to stimulus repetitions. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 535-544.
  • Asimov, I. (1942). Runaround. Astounding Science Fiction, 29(1), 94-103.