연구동향 분석
박사

복지국가의 거시경제상황이 복지태도에 미치는 영향 : 개인 특성 및 복지체제의 조절효과를 중심으로

김형관 2019년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 복지국가의 거시경제상황이 복지태도에 미치는 영향 : 개인 특성 및 복지체제의 조절효과를 중심으로' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • Welfare attitudes
  • demand for redistribution
  • evs
  • hlm
  • institutionalism
  • macroeconomic conditions
  • moderating effects
  • welfare regime
  • welfare state
  • wvs
  • 거시경제상황
  • 복지국가
  • 복지체제
  • 복지태도
  • 소득재분배 태도
  • 위계적 일반 선형 모형
  • 제도주의
  • 조절 효과
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
2,304 0

0.0%

' 복지국가의 거시경제상황이 복지태도에 미치는 영향 : 개인 특성 및 복지체제의 조절효과를 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국인의 복지태도는 어떻게 변화하고 있는가? 사회경제 적 지위 변수의 영향력을 중심으로
    김영순 여유진 2015 사회정책연합 공동 학술대회 [2015]
  • 한국인의 복지의식에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구
    이중섭 『사회복지정책』. 36(4):77-99 [2009]
  • 한국의 친복지태도 결정요인과 그 경로구조에 관한 탐색적 연구
    안상훈 『한국사회정책』. 16(1):163-192 [2009]
  • 한국의 복지인식 지형-계층, 복지수요, 공공복지 수급경 험의 영향을 중심으로
    백정미 주은선 ” 『사회복지연구』. 34:203-225 [2007]
  • 한국사회 복지태도 변화의 역동성: 개인 복지태도 변화에 대한 종단자료 분석
    김형관 이상록 이순아 ” 『한국사회복지연구회』. 48(4): 59-89 [2017]
  • 복지태도의 미시적 결정구조와 특성
    류진석 『한국사회복지학』. 56(4): 79-101 [2004]
  • 복지정치의 사회적 균열구조에 관한 연구-계급론의 한계와 새로 운 분석틀
    안상훈 『한국사회복지학』. 43:193-221 [2000]
  • 박시종 역. 2006.『복지국가는 해체되는가: 레이건, 대처, 그리고 축소의 정치』
    Pierson, P. 성균관대학교출판부 [1994]
  • 대학생의 복지의식과 SNS 이용이 사회 및 정치참 여에 미치는 영향“
    김소연 정희정 『한국가족복지학』. 17(1): 153-172 [2012]
  • “한국인의 사회복지에 대한 인식과 분산: 정치적 성향과 정 치적 지식의 역할을 중심으로”
    최유석 『사회복지정책』. 38(1): 57-83 [2011]
  • “한국인의 복지태도에서 성별 격차.”
    김수정 『여성학연구. 25(1): 63-91 [2015]
  • “한국인의 복지태도에 관한 경험적 연구.”
    김영란 『승가』. 18:165-186 [2001]
  • “한국인의 복지태도: 비계급성과 비일관성 문제를 중심으로”
    김영순 여유진 『경제와 사회』. 91:211-240 [2011]
  • “한국인의 복지태도 분화.”
    김희자 『사회복지정책』. 8;106-124 [1999]
  • “한국의 중간층은 어떤 복지국가를 원하는가? 중간 층의 복지태도와 복지국가 전망에의 함의.”
    김영순 여유진 『한국정치학회보』. 49(4): 335-362 [2015]
  • “한국의 복지태도의 정치적 역동성: 타계 급성과 정치적 기회의 재평가”
    김윤태 유승호 이훈희 “『한국학연구』45 [2013]
  • “한국사회의 시기 및 계층간 복지국가 지지 변동에 관한 종 단연구.”
    노법래 『행정논총』. 52(4): 139-164 [2014]
  • “한국사회에서의 세대와 복지태도 – 세대간 복지 태도 차이 및 세대 영향의 분석.”
    김형관 이상록 『사회과학연구』. 29(3): 433-458 [2013]
  • “한국사회 복지태도 결정에 지역구조가 미치는 영향.”
    김형관 전북 대학교 석사학위논문 [2011]
  • “한국 복지정치의 젠더메커니즘: 태도의 성별차이 와 복지지위 매개효과를 중심으로.”
    김은지 안상훈 『사회복지연구』. 41(2): 309-334 [2010]
  • “한국 복지국가의 향방에 대한 젊은 세대의 복지태 도 예측: 30대 및 40대를 중심으로.”
    문성호 이정화 『한국사회복지조사연구』. 46:165-194 [2015]
  • “한국 대학생의 복지태도: Q방법론을 통해 본 세 가지 인식 유형.”
    김훈태 이훈희 『사회보장연구』. 28(2): 23-49 [2012]
  • “지역의 정치․사회․경제적 특성이 복지의식에 미 치는 영향.”
    배진희 이중섭 『한국지역사회복지학』. 49: 233-250 [2014]
  • “지역별 복지의식에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구 –자 기이해, 사회화, 이데올로기, 수급자에 대한 태도 요인을 중심으로 -.”
    이중섭 함철호 『사회과학연구』. 26(4): 299-325 [2010]
  • “사회복지종사자의 직무만족이 복지의식에 미치는 영향 –청주시 사회복지종사자를 중심으로-.”
    김혜정 표갑수 『한국지역사회복지 학』. 41: 39-59 [2012]
  • “복지정치 활성화 과정에서의 국민인식 변화 연구.”
    안상훈 『재정 포럼』. 61-74 [2012]
  • “복지정책에 대한 지지도 연구 : 복지의식, 계층, 자 기이해의 영향을 중심으로.”
    류만희 최영 『한국정책과학학회보』. 13(1):191-210 [2009]
  • “복지인식 구조의 국가 간 비교: 사민주의, 자유주의, 보수주 의 복지국가와 한국
    김은지 백정미 주은선 ” 『사회복지연구』. 37:319-344 [2008]
  • “복지의식의 계급효과와 공사부문효과.”
    조돈문 『산업노동연구』. 7(1):157-191 [2001]
  • “복지국가의 제도적 특성이 복지태도에 미치는 효과 –노동 인구 및 비노동인구에 대한 복지태도를 중심으로 -.”
    김사현 성균관대학교 일반대학원 박사학위논문 [2009]
  • “복지국가의 정치적 균열에 관한 연구: 공적 노후소득보장 정책에 대한 인식을 중심으로.”
    김수완 사회보장연구』. 27(2): 251-278 [2011]
  • “복지국가의 유형화 분석 –지속성과 변화에 관한 비교연구”
    양재진 정의룡 한국행정학회 학술발표논문집. 1400-1417 [2011]
  • “노조간부의 복지태도 영향요인에 관한 연구.”
    황선자 『노동저널: 새로운 노동운동의 지평을 여는』. 10:45-60 [2011]
  • “개인의 주관적 인식이 복지제도의 보편성에 대한 선호에 미치는 효과: 도구변수를 활용한 접근법.”
    김사현 『사회복지연구』. 41(3): 213-239 [2010]
  • Wilensky, H. L. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality : Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley : University of California Press.
  • Voicu, B., Voicu, M., & Strapcova, K. 2007. “Gendered housework. A cross-European analysis.” Slovak Sociological Review. 39(6): 502-521.
  • Vasquez-Barquero, A. & Hebbert, M. 1985. “Spain: Economy and state in transition.” in Ray Hudson & Jim Lewis (eds.) Uneven Development in Southern Europe: Studies of Accumulation, Class, Migration and the State. London: Methuen. pp. 284-308.
  • Van Oorschot, W. 2007. “Culture and social policy: A developing field of study.” International Journal of Social Welfare. 16(2):129-139.
  • Van Oorschot, W. 2002. "Individual motives for contributing to welfare benefits in the Netherlands." Policy & Politics. 30: 31-46.
  • Van Oorschot, W. 2000. “Who should get what, and why?” Policy & Politics. 28(1): 33-48.
  • Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2015. “The future of social policy in Europe: An analysis of attitudes toward social welfare.” Ekonomski i socijalni razvoj. 2(2):0-0.
  • The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.박시종 역, 『복지자본주의의 세 가지 세계』
    Esping-Andersen, G. 성균관대학교 출판부 [1990]
  • Taylor-Gooby, P. 1985. Public Opinion, Ideology and State Welfare. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Svallfors, S. 2013. “Government quality, egalitarianism, and attitudes to taxes and social spending: A European comparison.” European Political Science Review. 5(03):363-380.
  • Svallfors, S. 2003. “Welfare regimes and welfare Opinions: A comparison of eight Western countries.” Social Indicators Research. 64(3): 495-520.
  • Svallfors, S. 1997. “Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight Western nations." European Sociological Review. 13(3): 283-304.
  • Svallfors, S. 1995. “The end of class politics? Structural cleavages and attitudes to Swedish welfare policies." Acta Sociologica. 38: 53-74.
  • Svallfors, S. 1993. “Dimensions of inequality : a comparison of attitudes in Sweden and Britain.” European Sociological Review. 9(3):267-287.
  • Stephens, J. 1979. The transition from capitalism to socialism. London: Macmillan.
  • Steele, L. G. 2015. “Income inequality, equal opportunity, and attitudes about redistribution.” Social Science Quarterly. 96(2): 444-464.
  • State. The Views of Congress and the Public. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Sotiropoulos, D, A. 2004. “Southern Europe public bureacracies in comparative perspective.” West European Politics. 27(3): 405-422.
  • Soede, A. J. Vrooman, J. C., Ferraresi, P. M. & Segre, G. 2004. Unequal Welfare States. The Hague, The Netherlands: Social Cultural Planning Office.
  • Sihvo, T. & Uusitalo, H. 1995. “Economic crises and support for the welfare state in Finland 1975-1993.” Acta Sociologica. 38(3):251-262.
  • Shalev, M. 1996. “The privatization of social policy?” in M. Shalev (ed). Introduction. London: Macmillan, 1–23.
  • Sears, D. O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R., & Allen, H. M. 1980. “Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting.” American Political Science Review. 74(03):670-684.
  • Saint-Arnaud, S. & Bernard, P. 2003. “Convergence or resilience? A hierarchical cluster analysis of the welfare regimes in advanced countries.” Current Sociology. 51(5): 499-527.
  • Rothstein, B. 1998. Just Institutions Matter : The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Roller, E. 1995. "The welfare state : the equality dimension." In The scope of government. edited by Ole Borne, & Elinor Scarborough. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Robinson, R. V. & Bell, W. 1978. “Equality, success, and social justice in England and the United States.” American Sociological Review. 125-143.
  • Rehm, P. 2004. “Individual preferences and the potential for political cleavages." Paper prepared for the workshop: Analysis of Political Cleavages and Party Competition. Duke University. Department of Political Science.
  • Piven, F, F. 2001. “Globalization, American politics, and welfare policy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 577: 26–37.
  • Pierson, P. 2001. “Coping with permanent austerity: Welfare restructuring in affluent democracies.” In Paul Pierson (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford University Press. 410-456.
  • Pierson, P. 1993. “When effect become cause: policy feedback and political change.” World Politics. 45: 595-628.
  • Papadakis, E. and Bean. C. 1993. “Popular support for the welfare state : A comparison between institutional regimes." J ournal of Public Policy. 13:228-254.
  • Pagoulatos, G. 2003. “Financial interventionism and liberalization in Southern Europe: State, bankers, and the politics of disinflation.” Journal of Public Policy. 23(2): 171-199.
  • Obinger, H. & Wagschal, U. 1998. “Welten des wohlfahrtskapitalismus.” in S. Lessenich & I. Ostner (eds). Drei Wohlfahrtsstaates? Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag, 109–35.
  • Naumann, E. 2014. “Increasing conflict in times of retrenchment? Attitudes towards healthcare provision in Europe between 1996 and 2002.” International J ournal of Social Welfare. 23(3):276-286.
  • Morelock, A, L, 2016. Public Support for Social Welfare Policies: A Cross-national Examination. PhD diss, University of Tennessee.
  • Mishra, R. 1981. The Welfare State in Crisis: Social Thought and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Meltzer, A. H. & Richard, S. F. 1981. “A rational theory of the size of government.” Journal of political Economy. 89(5):914-927.
  • Mehrtens, F, J. 2004. “Three worlds of public opinion? Values, variation, and the effect on social policy." International J ournal of Public Opinion Research. 16(2): 115-143.
  • Mau, S. 2004. “Welfare regimes and the norms of social exchange.” Current Sociology. 52(1):53-74.
  • Maravall, J, M. 1993. “Politics and policy: Economic reforms in Southern Europe.” in Luis Carlos Bresser Pereira, Jose Maria Maravall, & Adam Przeworski. (eds.) Economic Reforms in New Democracies: A Social Democratic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 77-131.
  • Lynch, J. & Myrskyl , M. 2009. “Always the third rail? Pension income and policy preferences in European democracies.” Comparative Political Studies. 42(8):1068-1097.
  • Lockhart, C. 2003. Protecting the Elderly: How Culture Shapes Social Policy. University Park PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Lipsmeyer, C, S. & Nordstrom, T. 2003. "East versus West: comparing political attitudes and welfare preferences across European societies." Journal of European Public Policy. 10: 339-364.
  • Lipset, S. M. 1968. Revolution and Counterrevolution. London: Heinemann.
  • Lipset, S. M. 1963. Political Man. London: Heinemann.
  • Linos, K. & West, M. 2003. “Self-interest, social beliefs, and attitude to redistribution.” European Sociological Review. 19(4): 393-409.
  • Leibfried, S. 1992. “Social policy in a changing Europe.” in Z. Ferge and J.E. Kolberg (eds), Towards a European welfare state. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag..
  • Leggett, J. C. 1964. “Economic insecurity and working-class consciousness.” American Sociological Review. 29:226–234.
  • Larsen, C. A. (2008). The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: How welfare regimes influence public support. Comparative political studies, 41(2), 145-168.
  • Larsen, C, A. 2005. "How welfare regimes influence judgement of deservingness and public support for welfare policy." Paper presented at the International Sociological Association RC 19 conference in Chicago on Re-theorizing welfare states: Restructuring States, Restructuring Analysis, September. 2005.
  • Kulin, J. & Svallfors, S. 2013. “Class, values, and attitudes towards redistribution: A European comparison.” European Sociological Review. 29(2): 155-167.
  • Koster, F. 2013. “Economic openness and welfare state attitudes: A multilevel study across 67 countries.” International Journal of Social Welfare. 23(2):128-138.
  • Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998). The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries. American sociological review, 661-687.
  • Korpi, W. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Kluegel, J. R. & Mateju, P. 1995. Egalitarian vs. Inegalitarian Principles of Distributive Justice. Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-communist States. Berlin and New York, de Gruyter, 209-238.
  • Kenworthy, L. & McCall, L. 2008. "Inequality, public opinion and redistribution." Socio Economic Review. 6(1):35-68.
  • Katrougalos, G. S. 1996. “The South European welfare model: The Greek welfare state in search of an identity.” Journal of European Social Policy. 6(1): 39–60.
  • Kangas, O. E. 1995. "Attitudes on means-tested social benefits in Finland." Acta Sociologica. 28(4):299-310.
  • Kangas, O. & Palme, J. 1992. Class Politics and Institutional Feedbacks: Development of Occupational Pensions in Finland and Sweden. Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.
  • Jakobsen, T. G. 2011. “Welfare attitudes and social expenditure: Do regimes shape public opinion?.” Social Indicators Research. 101(3): 323-340.
  • Jaime-Castillo, A. M., Fern ndez, J. J., Valiente, C., & Mayrl, D. 2016. “Collective religiosity and the gender gap in attitudes towards economic redistribution in 86 countries, 1990–2008.” Social Science Research. 57:17-30.
  • Jaeger, M. M. 2012. “Do we all (dis) like the same welfare state? Configurations of public support for the welfare state in comparative perspective.” in Kvsit Jon (eds.) Changing Social Equality: the Nordic Welfare Model in the 21st Century. Policy Press. 45-68.
  • Jaeger, M. M. 2011. “Macroeconomic and social change and popular demand for redistribution.”
  • Jaeger, M. M. 2009. “United but divided: Welfare regimes and the level and variance in public support for redistribution.” European Sociological Review. 25(6):723-737.
  • Jaeger, M. M. 2008. “Does Left–Right Orientation Have a Causal Effect on Support for Redistribution? Causal Analysis with Cross-Sectional Data using Instrumental Variables.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 20(3): 363–374.
  • Jacoby, W. G. 1994. "Public attitudes toward government spending." American J ournal of Political Science. 38(2):336-361.
  • J ger, M, M. 2006. "Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution, The regime hypothesis revisited." European Sociological Review. 22(2): 157-170.
  • Iversen, T. & Soskice, D. 2001. “An asset theory of social policy preferences." American Political Science Review. 95: 875-893.
  • Inglehart, R. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Hicks, A. M. 1999. Social Democracy & Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics. Cornell University Press.
  • Heien. T. & Hof cker. D. 1999. “How do welfare regimes influence attitudes? A comparison of five European countries and the United States 1985-1996.” Paper presented at the ECSR-Workshop Causes and Consequences of Socio-Economic and Political Attitudes in Eastern and Western Europe. Mannheim, Germany(October 7-8, 1999).
  • Hasenfeld, Y. & Rafferty, J. A. 1989. “The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state." Social Forces. 67(4): 1027-1048.
  • Hall, P. A. 1986. Governing the Economy : The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York : Oxford University Press.
  • Gough, I. 2000. “Welfare Regimes: on Adapting the Framework to Developing Countries": ht tp://www.bath.ac.uk/Facult ies/HumSocSci/ IFIPA/GSP/. University of Bath: Institute for International Policy Analysis.
  • Goerres, A. 2007. “Demands for welfare state provisions by a powerful generation: Comparing British and German baby-boomers." Paper prepared for delivery at the 2007 Bi-annual Conference of the European Consortium of Political Research. 6-8 September 2007.
  • Giner, S. 1985. “Political economy, legitimation and the state in Southern Europe.” in Ray Hudson & Jim Lewis (eds.) Uneven Development in Southern Europe: Studies of Accumulation, Class, Migration and the State. London: Methuen. 309-350.
  • Gilens, M. 1995 “Racial attitudes and opposition to welfare.” The Journal of Politics. 57: 994-1014.
  • Gelissen, J. 2000. “Popular support for institutionalised solidarity: a comparison between European welfare states.” International Journal of Social Welfare. 9:285-300.
  • G rxhani, K. & Koster, F. 2012. “I am not alone: Understanding public support for the welfare state.” International Sociology. 27(6): 768-787.
  • Franklin, C, H. 1984. "Issue preferences, socialization, and the evolution of party identification." American Journal of Political Science. 28: 459-478.
  • Fraile, M. & Ferrer, M. 2005. “Explaining the determinants of public support for cuts in unemployment benefits spending across OECD countries.” International Sociology. 20(4): 459-81.
  • Forma, P. 1997. “The rational legitimacy of the welfare state: popular support for ten income transfer schemes in Finland." Policy and Politics. 25(3): 235-249.
  • Fong, C. 2001. "Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution." J ournal of Public Economics. 82: 225-246.
  • Finseraas, 2008. “Income inequality and demand for redistribution: A multilevel analysis of European pubic opinion.” Scandinavian Political Studies. 32(1):94-119.
  • Ferrera, M. 2005. “Welfare states and social nets in Southern Europe: An introduction.” in Maurizio (ed.) 2005. Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe: Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 1-32.
  • Ferrera, M. 1996. “The southern model of welfare in social Europe." Journal of European Social Policy. 6(1): 17-37.
  • Ferragina, E. & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. 2011. “Thematic review: Welfare regime debate: Past, present, futures?” Policy & Politics. 39(4): 583-611.
  • Fernandez J. J. & Jaime-Castillo, A. M. 2013. “Positive or negative policy feedbacks? Explaining popular attitudes towards pragmatic pension policy reforms.” European Sociological Review. 29(4): 803-815.
  • Feldman, S. & Zaller, J. 1992. “The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state.” American Journal of Political Science. 36: 268-307.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. 1996. Welfare States in Transition. London: Sage.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. 1985. Politics against Market. Princeton, N. J : Princeton University Press.
  • Erikson, R, S. Michael B, M. & James A, S. 2002. The Macro Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Edlund, J. 2009. Attitudes towards State Organized Welfare in 22 Societies: A Question of Convergence? In charting the Globe. The International Social Survey Program. Eds, Haller, M. Jowell, R and Smith, T. Routledge London
  • Edlund, J. 1999. “Trust in government and welfare regimes: attitudes to redistribution and financial cheating in the USA and Norway." European Journal of Political Research. 35: 341-370.
  • Edlund, J. & Svallfors, S. 2009. Cohort, Class and Attitudes to Redistribution: Britain and the US, 1996-2006. presented at the 7th Annual ESPAnet Conference, Urbino, 17-19 Sep 2009.
  • Durr, R. H. 1993. “What moves policy sentiment?” The American Political Science Review. 87:158–170.
  • Douglas, M. 1987. How Institutions Think. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Dallinger, U. 2010. “Public support for redistribution: What explains cross-national differences?” J ournal of European Social Policy. 20(4): 333-349.
  • Cutright, P. 1965. “Political structure, economic development, and national social security programs.” American J ournal of Sociology, 70: 537–550.
  • Crompton, R. (2006) Employment and the family, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Corneo, G. & Gr ner, H. P. 2002. “Individual Preferences for Political Redistribution.” J ournal of public Economics. 83(1): 83-107
  • Cnaan, R. A., Hasenfeld, Y., Cnaan, A., & Rafferty, J. 1993. “Cross-cultural comparison of attitudes toward welfare-state programs: Path analysis with log-linear models.” Social Indicators Research. 29(2):123-152. Cook, F. L. & Barrett, E. J. 1992. Support for the American Welfare
  • Castles, F. G. & Obinger, H. 2008. “Worlds, families, regimes.” West European Politics. 31: 321–44. CNEF (Cross-National Equivalent File) (1970–2008) Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
  • Castles, F. G. & Mitchell, D. 1992. “Identifying welfare state regimes: The links between politics, instruments, and outcomes.” Governance. 5(1): 1–26.
  • Busemeyer, M. R. & Goerres, A. & Weschle, S. 2009. "Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: The rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries." Journal of European Social Policy. 19(3): 195-212.
  • Brooks, C. & Manza. J. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist : The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
  • Bonoli, G. 1997. “Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach." Journal of Social Policy. 26(3): 351–372.
  • Blekesaune, M. 2007. “Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies." European Sociological Review. 23(3): 393-403.
  • Blekesaune, M. & Quadagno, J. 2003. “Public attitudes towards welfare state policies : A comparative analysis of 24 nations." European Sociological Review. 19(5): 415-427.
  • Bean, C. & Papadakis, E. 1998. “A Comparison of mass attitudes towards the welfare state in different institutional regimes, 1985-1990." International J ournal of Public Opinion Research. 10(3): 221-236.
  • Baslevent, C. & Kirmanoglu, H. 2011. “Discerning self-interested behaviour in attitudes towards welfare state responsibilities across Europe.” International Journal of Social Welfare. 20:344-352.
  • Bambra, C. 2006. “Decommodication and the worlds of welfare revisited..” Journal of European Social Policy. 16(1): 73-80.
  • Arts, W. & Gelissen, J. 2001. "Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter?" Acta Sociologica. 44: 283-299.
  • Arikan, G. & Bloom, P. B. 2014. “Social values and cross-national differences in attitudes toward welfare.” Political Studies. 1-18.
  • Andre , H. & Heien, T. 2001. "Four worlds of welfare state attitudes, A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States." European Sociological Review. 17(4): 337-356.
  • Andre , H. & Heien, T. 1999. “Explaining public attitudes towards the German welfare state using structural equation models.” WME-Arbeitspapier. 7: 1-28.
  • Alt, J. E. 1979. The Politics of Economic Decline : Economic Management and Political Behavior in Britain since 1964. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.