연구동향 분석
박사

다공성 티타늄 구조가 골다공증이 유발된 비글견에서 임플란트의 골융합에 미치는 효과

고석영 2019년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 다공성 티타늄 구조가 골다공증이 유발된 비글견에서 임플란트의 골융합에 미치는 효과' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • Animal
  • Dental implant
  • Osseointegration
  • Osteoporosis
  • Titanium
  • porosity
  • 골다공증
  • 골융합
  • 다공성
  • 동물
  • 치과 임플란트
  • 티타늄
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,173 0

0.0%

' 다공성 티타늄 구조가 골다공증이 유발된 비글견에서 임플란트의 골융합에 미치는 효과' 의 참고문헌

  • d'Hoedt B, Schulte W. A comparative study of results with various endosseous implant systems. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 1989;4:95-105.
  • Zetterqvist L, Feldman S, Rotter B, et al. A prospective, multicenter, randomized‐controlled 5‐year study of hybrid and fully etched implants for the incidence of peri‐implantitis. Journal of periodontology 2010;81:493-501.
  • Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2010;25.
  • Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical oral implants research 2009;20:172- 184.
  • Vernino AR, Kohles SS, Holt Jr RA, Lee H-M, Caudill RF, Kenealy JN. Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: a histologic comparison in baboons. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 2002;22.
  • Van Blitterswijk C, Grote J, Kuijpers W, Daems WT, De Groot K. Macropore tissue ingrowth: a quantitative and qualitative study on hydroxyapatite ceramic. Biomaterials 1986;7:137-143.
  • Traini T, Mangano C, Sammons R, Mangano F, Macchi A, Piattelli A. Direct laser metal sintering as a new approach to fabrication of an isoelastic functionally graded material for manufacture of porous titanium dental implants. Dental materials 2008;24:1525-1533.
  • Todisco M, Trisi P. Histomorphometric evaluation of six dental implant surfaces after early loading in augmented human sinuses. Journal of Oral Implantology 2006;32:153-166.
  • Thomas KA, Cook SD. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1985;19:875-901.
  • Svehla M, Morberg P, Zicat B, Bruce W, Sonnabend D, Walsh W. Morphometric and mechanical evaluation of titanium implant integration: comparison of five surface structures. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials 2000;51:15-22.
  • Spector M, Kwiatkowski G, Smarook W, Michno M. A high modulus polymer for porous orthopaedic implants. In: 9th Annual Proceedings of the International Biomaterials Symposium, New Orleans, Louisiana. vol. 9, 1976:134.
  • Scolozzi P, Jaques B. Treatment of midfacial defects using prostheses supported by ITI dental implants. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2004;114:1395- 1404.
  • Schwarz ML, Kowarsch M, Rose S, Becker K, Lenz T, Jani L. Effect of surface roughness, porosity, and a resorbable calcium phosphate coating on osseointegration of titanium in a minipig model. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials 2009;89:667-678.
  • Schwarz F, Sculean A, Engebretson SP, Becker J, Sager M. Animal models for peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis. Periodontology 2000 2015;68:168- 181.
  • Schliephake H, Neukam F, Klosa D. Influence of pore dimensions on bone ingrowth into porous hydroxylapatite blocks used as bone graft substitutes: A histometric study. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 1991;20:53-58.
  • Schlee M, van der Schoor WP, van der Schoor AR. Immediate loading of Trabecular Metal‐enhanced titanium dental implants: interim results from an international proof‐of‐principle study. Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2015;17:e308-e320.
  • Schlee M, Pradies G, Mehmke WU, et al. Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of Trabecular Metal‐Enhanced Titanium Dental Implants Placed in Routine Dental Practices: 1‐Year Interim Report From the Development Period (2010 to 2011). Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2015;17:1141-1153.
  • Santos M, Campos M, Line S. Early dental implant failure: A review of the literature. Braz J Oral Sci 2002;1:103-111.
  • Salimov F, Tatli U, K rk M, Akoğlan M, ztun H, Kurtoğlu C. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study. Clinical oral implants research 2014;25:1016-1021.
  • Rodgers JB, Monier-Faugere M-C, Malluche H. Animal models for the study of bone loss after cessation of ovarian function. Bone 1993;14:369-377.
  • Robertson DM, St. Pierre L, Chahal R. Preliminary observations of bone ingrowth into porous materials. Journal of biomedical materials research 1976;10:335-344.
  • Pilliar RM. Overview of surface variability of metallic endosseous dental implants: textured and porous surface-structured designs. Implant dentistry 1998;7:305-314.
  • Pilliar R, Deporter D, Watson P, Todescan R. The Endopore implant-enhanced osseointegration with a sintered porous-surfaced design. Oral health 1998;88:61-64.
  • Peterson LJ, McKinney Jr RV, Penn l BM, Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM. Clinical, radiographic, and histological evaluation of porous rooted cobalt-chromium alloy dental implants. Journal of dental research 1980;59:99-108.
  • Pattanaik B, Pawar S, Pattanaik S. Biocompatible implant surface treatments. Indian Journal of Dental Research 2012;23:398.
  • Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clinical oral implants research 2001;12:79-84.
  • Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Schlegel KA, Nkenke E, Eitner S. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels adjacent to parallel‐screw cylinder machinedneck implants and rough‐surfaced microthreaded implants using digitized panoramic radiographs. Clinical oral implants research 2009;20:550-554.
  • Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2005;20.
  • Moraschini V, Poubel LdC, Ferreira V, dos Sp Barboza E. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a followup period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2015;44:377-388.
  • Montes CC, Pereira FA, Thome G, et al. Failing factors associated with osseointegrated dental implant loss. Implant dentistry 2007;16:404-412.
  • Merheb J, Temmerman A, Rasmusson L, K bler A, Thor A, Quirynen M. Influence of skeletal and local bone density on dental implant stability in patients with osteoporosis. Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2016;18:253-260.
  • Mangano F, Chambrone L, Van Noort R, Miller C, Hatton P, Mangano C. Direct metal laser sintering titanium dental implants: a review of the current literature. International journal of biomaterials 2014;2014.
  • Liu Y, Bao C, Wismeijer D, Wu G. The physicochemical/biological properties of porous tantalum and the potential surface modification techniques to improve its clinical application in dental implantology. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2015;49:323-329.
  • Lindh C, Nilsson M, Klinge B, Petersson A. Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1996;25:146- 150.
  • Lee JW, Wen HB, Gubbi P, Romanos GE. New bone formation and trabecular bone microarchitecture of highly porous tantalum compared to titanium implant threads: A pilot canine study. Clinical oral implants research 2018;29:164-174.
  • Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 1999;19.
  • Kronstr m M, Svenson B, Hellman M, Persson GR. Early implant failures in patients treated with Br nemark System titanium dental implants: a retrospective study. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2001;16.
  • Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM, Cooke FW, Peterson LJ, Pennel BM, Mckinney jr RV. An evaluation of porous alumina ceramic dental implants. Journal of dental research 1977;56:768-776.
  • Kirsch A. Tierexperimentelle untersuchungen zur bedeutung der micromorphologie von titanimplantatobe tichen. Fortschr Zahnarztl Implanto 1984;1:35-40.
  • Kimmel D. In vivo animal models in osteoporosis research. Osteoporosis Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston 1994:354-382.
  • Kim D-G, Jeong Y-H, Chien H-H, Agnew AM, Lee JW, Wen HB. Immediate mechanical stability of threaded and porous implant systems. Clinical Biomechanics 2017;48:110-117.
  • Kim D-G, Huja SS, Tee BC, et al. Bone ingrowth and initial stability of titanium and porous tantalum dental implants: a pilot canine study. Implant dentistry 2013;22:399-405.
  • Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS biology 2010;8:e1000412.
  • Kilkenny C, Altman D. Improving bioscience research reporting: ARRIVE-ing at a solution. Laboratory animals 2010;44:377-378.
  • Jang T-S, Jung H-D, Kim S, et al. Multiscale porous titanium surfaces via a two-step etching process for improved mechanical and biological performance. Biomedical Materials 2017;12:025008.
  • Franchi M, Bacchelli B, Martini D, et al. Early detachment of titanium particles from various different surfaces of endosseous dental implants. Biomaterials 2004;25:2239-2246.
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods 2009;41:1149-1160.
  • Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants,(II). Etiopathogenesis. European journal of oral sciences 1998;106:721-764.
  • Esposito M, Hirsch J, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Differential diagnosis and treatment strategies for biologic complications and failing oral implants: a review of the literature. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 1999;14.
  • Esposito M, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington H. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;1.
  • Elias CN, Oshida Y, Lima JHC, Muller CA. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2008;1:234-242.
  • Deporter D, Watson P, Pilliar R, et al. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implants in dogs. Journal of Dental Research 1986;65:1064-1070.
  • Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 2000;20.
  • Deporter D, Ogiso B, Sohn DS, Ruljancich K, Pharoah M. Ultrashort sintered porous‐surfaced dental implants used to replace posterior teeth. Journal of periodontology 2008;79:1280-1286.
  • Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. Journal of dental education 2003;67:932-949.
  • Cook SD, Kay JF, Thomas KA, Jarcho M. Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxylapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1987;2.
  • Cochran D. Implant therapy I. Annals of Periodontology 1996;1:707-791.
  • Cochran D, Schenk R, Lussi A, Higginbottom F, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and the Australian Society for Biomaterials 1998;40:1-11.
  • Chen Y, Shin H-I, Kyung H-M. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and selftapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2008;133:44-50.
  • Calandruccio JH, Grear BJ, Mauck BM, Sawyer JR, Toy PC, Weinlein JC. Infection, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics, E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
  • Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched surface: A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials 1999;45:75-83.
  • Breer S, Hahn M, Kendoff D, et al. Histological ex vivo analysis of retrieved human tantalum augmentations. International orthopaedics 2012;36:2269-2274.
  • Bobyn J, Pilliar R, Cameron H, Weatherly G. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1980:263-270.
  • Blomqvist JE, Alberius P, Isaksson S, Linde A, Hansson B-G. Factors in implant integration failure after bone grafting: an osteometric and endocrinologic matched analysis. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 1996;25:63-68.
  • Bencharit S, Byrd WC, Altarawneh S, et al. Development and applications of porous tantalum trabecular metal‐enhanced titanium dental implants. Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2014;16:817-826.
  • Baxter JC, Fattore L. Osteoporosis and osseointegration of implants. Journal of Prosthodontics 1993;2:120-125.
  • Bandyopadhyay A, Espana F, Balla VK, Bose S, Ohgami Y, Davies NM. Influence of porosity on mechanical properties and in vivo response of Ti6Al4V implants. Acta biomaterialia 2010;6:1640-1648.
  • Att W, Stappert C. Implant therapy to improve quality of life. Quintessence international 2003;34.
  • Aparicio C, Lang NP, Rangert B. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clinical oral implants research 2006;17:2-7.
  • Anil S, Anand P, Alghamdi H, Jansen J. Dental implant surface enhancement and osseointegration. In: Implant dentistry-A rapidly evolving practice: InTech, 2011.
  • Al‐Nawas B, G tz H. Three‐dimensional topographic and metrologic evaluation of dental implants by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2003;5:176-183.
  • Aljateeli M, Wang H-L. Implant microdesigns and their impact on osseointegration. Implant dentistry 2013;22:127-132.
  • Albrektsson T. The healing of autologous bone grafts after varying degrees of surgical trauma. A microscopic and histochemical study in the rabbit. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume 1980;62:403-410.
  • Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. European spine journal 2001;10:S96-S101.
  • Albrektsson T, Eriksson A, Friberg B, et al. Histologic investigations on 33 retrieved Nobelpharma implants. Clinical materials 1993;12:1-9.
  • Albrektsson T, Br nemark P-I, Hansson H-A, Lindstr m J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct boneto- implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1981;52:155-170.