연구동향 분석
박사

일반교사와 특수교사의 협력교수를 통한 직접교수 제공이 초등학교 3학년 곱셈과 나눗셈 성취도와 수학태도에 미치는 영향 : 일반학생, 수학 학습장애 위험군 학생, 수학 학습장애 학생을 중심으로 = The Effects of the Direct Instruction Delivered through Co-Teaching of Regular Education Teacher and Special Education Teacher on Mathematics Achievement and Attitude : teaching normal-achieving students, at-risk students and students with math disabilities

김병룡 2019년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 일반교사와 특수교사의 협력교수를 통한 직접교수 제공이 초등학교 3학년 곱셈과 나눗셈 성취도와 수학태도에 미치는 영향 : 일반학생, 수학 학습장애 위험군 학생, 수학 학습장애 학생을 중심으로 = The Effects of the Direct Instruction Delivered through Co-Teaching of Regular Education Teacher and Special Education Teacher on Mathematics Achievement and Attitude : teaching normal-achieving students, at-risk students and students with math disabilities' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 곱셈
  • 나눗셈
  • 성취도
  • 수학 학습장애
  • 수학에 대한 태도
  • 직접교수
  • 협력교수
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
218 0

0.0%

' 일반교사와 특수교사의 협력교수를 통한 직접교수 제공이 초등학교 3학년 곱셈과 나눗셈 성취도와 수학태도에 미치는 영향 : 일반학생, 수학 학습장애 위험군 학생, 수학 학습장애 학생을 중심으로 = The Effects of the Direct Instruction Delivered through Co-Teaching of Regular Education Teacher and Special Education Teacher on Mathematics Achievement and Attitude : teaching normal-achieving students, at-risk students and students with math disabilities' 의 참고문헌

  • 황민아, 이준석, 박현 학습장애 위험학생 선별검사 개발에 관 한 예비연구 결과-문항내적 합치도와 내용타당도를 중심으로
    김애화 신현기 한경근 특수교육학연구, 41(3), 351-384 [2006]
  • 협력교수가 학습장애 학생과 비장애 학생의 학업성취도와 사회성 기술에 미 치는 영향
    최승숙 학습장애연구, 6(1), 1-25 [2009]
  • 협력교수가 초등학생의 국어과 학업성취도, 수업선호도, 수업참여도에 미치는 영향
    김애화 유현주 학습장애연구, 8(2), 183-204 [2011]
  • 협력교수가 지적 장애 학생의 수학과 학업 성취도에 미치는 영향에 관한 사례연구
    백은희 임동진 정신지체연구, 6. 35-55 [2004]
  • 한국과 미국의 학습장애 현황 비교를 통해 본 한국형 중재반 응모델 제언
    변찬석 조은미 최나리 특수교육저널: 이론과 실천, 12(3), 587-611 [2011]
  • 한국 웩슬러 아동용 지능검사(K-WISC-IV)
    곽금주 김청택 오상우 서울, 학지사 심리검사 연구소 [2011]
  • 학습장애학생을 위한 중재연구에 관한 문헌분석
    김애화 특수교육저널: 이론과 실천, 7(2), 265-299 [2006]
  • 학습장애 이론과 실제
  • 학습장애 및 학습부진 문제 해결을 위한 직접교수법의 이론과 활용방안: 직접 교수법의 의미와 주요 특징
    이대식 학습장애연구, 1(1), 133-161 [2004]
  • 학습장애 또는 학습부진 학생들의 수학문장제 문장해결력 중재효과에 대한 메타분석
    장경윤 전윤희 특수교육학연구, 47(4), 139-163 [2013]
  • 학습부진 및 경도장애 아동을 위한 수학(수 개념 및 기본연 산) 중재 효과 메타 연구
    권미진 김소희 윤지영 학습장애연구, 11(3), 1-21 [2014]
  • 표상전략교수와 직접교수가 수학학습부진아의 문장제 해결력과 자 기효능감에 미치는 효과 비교
    양문창 정동영 교원교육, 25(3), 183-198 [2009]
  • 특수교육 연차보고서
    교육부 특수교육 연차보고서 [2018]
  • 통합학급 내 장애학생의 교수-학습을 위한 특수교사와 일반교사의 협력모형과 실제
    최승숙 학습장애연구, 3(1), 11-137 [2006]
  • 초중등교육과정 국어과 총론
    교육부 [2016]
  • 초등학교 수학교과 팀티칭 교과에 관한 연구
    하민수 건국대학교 대학 원. 석사학위논문 [1997]
  • 초등학교 수학과 3학년 2학기 교사용지도서
    교육부 한국과학창의재단 [2018]
  • 초등학교 수학과 3학년 1학기 교사용지도서
    교육부 한국과학창의재단 [2018]
  • 초등학교 교육과정 총론
    교육부 교육부 고시 제2015-74호[별책 2] [2015]
  • 초등학교 1학년 수학학습장애 위험아동을 위한 중재반응모형의 적 용 가능성 탐색
    정대영 하정숙 학습장애연구, 9(2), 113-141 [2012]
  • 질적 지표에 의거한 최근 10년간 학습 장애 집단 실험연구 동향 분석 및 학습장애 연구에 주는 시사점 연구
    김태강 박윤 양안숙 장은미 최은순 허유성 특수교육저 널: 이론과 실천, 11(1). 469-498 [2010]
  • 직접교수와 진전도 모니터링이 수학학습부진 및 수학학습 장애아 동의 기초연산능력 및 발달 패턴에 미치는 효과
    김동일 이태수 특수교육학연구, 40(3), 171-189 [2005]
  • 직접교수법에 기반을 둔 시험전략 교수가 읽기학습부진 학생의 학 업성취도 및 학습동기에 미치는 영향
    강옥려 황문영 학습장애연구, 11(2), 227-255 [2014]
  • 중재반응모형을 활용한 연산장애 출연율 조사 방안 탐색
    강옥려 여승수 홍성두 학습장애연구, 7(3), 1-18 [2010]
  • 중재반응모형에 의한 수학학습장애학생의 선별 과정
    강옥려 김혜영 특수교육연 구, 17(2), 275-299 [2010]
  • 중재반응모델에 기초한 직접교수가 수학 학습장애 아동, 학습부진아동의 연산능력에 미치는 효과
    강옥려 김광수 이새별 홍성두 한국초등교육연구, 26(4), 435-458 [2015]
  • 수감각 발달을 이한 조기 수학 교수가 수학 학습장애 위험학생의 수 개념과 연산능력에 미치는 효과 연구
    김애화 이윤미 초등교육연구, 21(3), 287-312 [2008]
  • 발달지체유아 통합교육기관의 협력교수 수행 과정 연구
    박소현 신현기 특수교육 저널 : 이론과 실천, 8(4), 161-195 [2007]
  • 다층메타분석분석을 활용한 학습장애 및 학습부진학생들의 수학 연산능력 향상을 위한 중재 효과 분석
    고혜정 김동일 조영희 특수교육저널: 이론과 실천, 16(1), 1-23 [2015]
  • 다양성 이해교육 프로그램이 초등 통합학급 학생들의 공감능력, 문화적 민감성 및 장애수용 태도에 미친 효과
    남혜진 박승희 특수교육연구, 13(3), 53-76 [2014]
  • 기억전략을 활용한 구체물-반구체물-추상물 교수가 수학학습장애 학생 의 받아내림이 있는 뺄셈 성취도에 미치는 효과
    김애화 정경아 초등교육연구, 28(4), 267-292 [2015]
  • 국내 학습장애아 급감 추세와 관련된 요인에 대한 소고
    김지연 특수교육학연구, 51(4), 91-113 [2017]
  • 국내 직접교수 수학 연구의 증거-기반 정도와 효과 분석-체계적 개관 (Systematic Review)과 메타분석(Meta-Analysis)을 중심으로-
    정광조 홍성두 한국초등교육, 26(1), 363-377 [2015]
  • 『교육 심리 사회 연구방법론』
    이종승 서울: 교육과학사 [2009]
  • Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’'s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360
  • Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Chen, M., Claessens, A., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., & Susperreguy, M. I. (2015). The role of mediators in the development of longitudinal mathematics achievement associations. Child Development, 86(6), 1892 –1907.
  • Walther-Thomas, C., Korinek, L., McLaughlin, V. L., & Williams, B. T. (2000). Collaboration for inclusive education: Developing successful programs. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Walther-Thomas, C., Korinek, L., & McLaughlin, V. L. (1999). Collaboration to Support Students' Success. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(2), 1-18.
  • Walsh, J. M. & Jones, B. (2004). New models of cooperatively teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36, 14-20.
  • Vukovic, R. K., & Sigel, L. S. (2010). Academic and cognitive characteristics of persistent mathematics from first through fourth grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 25-38.
  • Vostal, B. R., Hughes, C. A., Ruhl, K. L., Benedek-Wood, & Dexter, D. D. (2008). A content analysis of learning disabilities research & practice: 1991-2007. Learning Disabilities Research & Practices, 23(4), 184-193.
  • Volonino, V., & Zigmond, N. (2007). Promoting Research-Based Practices Through Co-teaching? Theory into Practice, 46(4), 291-300.
  • Van Tassel-Beska, J., & Satmbaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 211-217.
  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Digest of Education Statistics, 2015(NCES 2016-014), Chapter 2, Retrieved on March13, 2018, from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=64
  • Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. (2000). Attitudes toward mathematics instrument: An investigation with middle schools students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, Kentucky.
  • Tannock, M. T. (2009). Tangible and intangible elements of collaborative teaching. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(3), 173-178.
  • Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A Selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 249-274.
  • Stein, M., Kinder, D., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. W. (2006). Designing Effective Mathematics Instruction: A Direct Instruction Approach. New Jersery: Pearson Education.
  • Spelke, E. S., & Tsivkin, S. (2001). Initial Knowledge and conceptual change: Space and number. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Siegel, L. S., & Mazabel, S. (2013). Basic cognitive processes and reading disabilities. In H. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 186-213). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Shaw, S. R. (2010). Rescuing students from the slow learner trap. Principal Leadership, 10, 12-16.
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Council for Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392-416.
  • Scott, B. J., Vitale, M. R., & Masten, W. G. (1998). Implementing Instructional Adaptations for Students with Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 19(2), 106-119.
  • Schwartz Green, L., & Casale-Giannola, D. (2011). Active learning strategies for the inclusion classroom. Grades K-5. CA: Corwin Press.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenber(Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, 2, 142-175.
  • Sawyer, R. K., (2004). Creative Teaching: Collaborative Discussion as Disciplined Improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12-20.
  • SPSS에 의한 성장곡선모형 분석방법 탐색
    임시혁 교육논총, 51(1), 95 -113 [2014]
  • Rosenshine, B. (1976). Classroom Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ronfeldt, M., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475-514.
  • Rice, N., Drame, E., Owens, L., Frattura, E. M. (2007). Co-instructing at the secondary level. Strategies for success. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(6), 12-18.
  • Raghubar, K., Barnes, M., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Fletcher, J., & Fuchs, L. (2009). Errors in multidigit arithmetic and behavioral inattention in children with math difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 356-371.
  • Perry, V., Albeg, L., & Tung, C. (2012). Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Design Research on Self-Regulatory Interventions for Academic Performance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21(3), 217-229.
  • Parmar, R. S., Cawley, J. E., & Frazita, R. (1996). Word problems solving by students with and without mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 415-429.
  • Parmar, R. S. (1992). Protocol analysis of strategies used by students with mild disabilities when solving arithmetics word problems. Diagnostigue, 17, 227-243.
  • Nolet, V., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2005). Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standard-based reform (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • No Child Left Behind Act(NCLB) of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 115 Stat. 14. National Joint Committee On Learning Dsiabilities (1988). [Letter to NJCLD member organization].
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (1992). Characteristics of at-risk students in NELS:88. United States Department of education Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
  • National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2008). Response to intervention blueprints for implementation. Available from: http://www.nasdse.org/Portals/0/SCHOOL.pdf. Accessed Feb. 28, 2018.
  • Murawski, W. W., & Dieker, L. A. (2004). Tips and strategies for co-teaching at the secondary level. Council for Exceptional Children, 36(5), 52-58.
  • Murawski, W. W. (2008). Five keys to co-teaching in inclusion classroom. The School Administrator 65(8), 27.
  • Murawski, W. W. (2006). Students outcomes in co-taught secondary English classes: how can we improve? Reading/Writing Quarterly, 22, 358-268.
  • Murawski, W. W. & Hughes, C. E. (2009). Response to Intervention, Collaboration, and Co-Teaching: A Logical Combination for Successful Systemic Change. Preventing School Failure, 53(4), 267-277.
  • Murawski, W. W, & Dieker, L. A. (2008). 50 ways to keep you co-teacher: Strategies for before, during and after co-teaching . Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(4), 40-48.
  • Misquitta, R. (2011). A Review of the Literature: Fraction Instruction for Struggling Learners in Mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(2), 109-119.
  • Merchand-Martella, N., Slocum, T., & Martella, R. (2004). Instruction to Direct Instruction. Journal of Direct Instruction, 3(2), 77-110.
  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Graetz, J., Norland, J., Gardizi, W., & McDuffie, K. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failure, and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(5), 260-270.
  • Majeed, A. A., Darmawan, I. G. N., & Lynch, P. (2013). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Attitudes Toward Mathematics Inventory(ATMI). The Mathematics Educator, 15(1), 121-135.
  • MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Schwartz, S. S. (1991). Knowledge of revision and revising behavior among learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quaterly, 76, 438-456.
  • MacArthur, C. A., & Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation. The Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 22-42.
  • Lembke, E. S., Hampton, D., & Beyers, S. J. (2012). Response to Intervention in Mathematics: Critical Elements. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 257-272.
  • Latz, A. O., Spiers Neumeister, K. L., Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2009). Peer coaching to improve classroom differentiation perspectives from project CLUE. Roeper Review, 31(1), 27-39.
  • Kroesbergen, E. H. & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2003). Mathematics Interventions for Children with Special Educational Needs. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97-114.
  • Kloo, A., & Zigmond., (2008). Co-teaching revisited: Redrawing the Blueprint. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 12-20.
  • Kline, T. J. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Kirk, S. A. (1962). Educating exceptional children. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Kame'enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
  • Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867.
  • Jones, R., Yssel, J., & Grant, C. (2012). Reading Instruction in Tier 1: Bridging the gaps by nesting evidence-based interventions within differentiated instruction. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 210-219.
  • Jones, M., Michael, C., Mandala, J. & Colachico, D. (2008). Collaborative teaching: Creating a partnership between general and special education. The International Journal of Learning, 15(7), 203-208.
  • Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C., Deatline-Buchman, A., Dipipi-Hoy, C., Sczesniak, E., Sokol, N. G., & Xin, Y. P. (2005). Adherence to mathematical professional standards and instructional criteria for problem-solving in mathematics. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 319-337.
  • Jewell, S. (2014). The Effectiveness of Co-teaching Teams in Secondary Schools. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act(IDEA) of 2004, PL 108-446, 20U.S.C. 1400 et seq
  • Idol, L. (2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education: a program evalusation of eight schools. Remedial and Special Education, 27(2), 77-94.
  • Howard, L. & Potts, E. A. (2009). Using Co-Planning time: Strategies for a Successful Co-Teaching Marriage. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 5(4), 1-12.
  • Heward, W. L. (2013). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Hecht, S. A., Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2001). The relations between phonological processing abilities and emerging individual differences in mathematical computation skill: A longitudinal study from second to fifth grades. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 192-227.
  • Hart, B. & Risely, T. R. (2009). The early catastrophe. Education Review, 17, 110-118.
  • Hang, Q., & Rabren, K., (2009). An Examinaation of Co-Teaching: Perspectives and Efficacy Indicators. Remedial and Special Education, 30(5), 259-268.
  • Hallahan, D. P., Pullen, P. C., & Ward, D. (2013). A brief history of the field of learning disabilities. In H. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds), Handbook of learning disabilities(pp. 15-32). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. in H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham(Eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities(pp. 323-344). New York: Guilford.
  • Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation fo teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teacher College Record, 109(4), 877-896.
  • Gersten, R., Woodward, J., & Darch, C., (1986). Direct Instruction: A Research-Based Approach to Curriculum Design and Teaching. Exceptional Children, 53(1), 17-31.
  • Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293-304.
  • Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Instructional Components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202-1242.
  • Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., et al. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools. NCEE 2009-4060. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2013). Adolescents’' functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLoS One, 8(1), e54651.
  • Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343-1359.
  • Geary, D. C., Brown, S. C., & Samaranayake, V. A. (1991). Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 787-797.
  • Geary, D. C., (2004). Mathematics and Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4-15.
  • Gately, S. J., & Gately, F., (2001). Understanding Coteaching Components. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4), 40-47.
  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(2), 79-92.
  • Fuch, L., S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K. Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 493-513.
  • Friend, M., Cook, L., Hurley-Chamberlain, D., & Shamberger, C. (2010). Co-Teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological, 20, 9-27.
  • Friend, M., & Thousand, J. S. (2005). Enhancing literacy through co-teaching. The New Hampshire Journal of Education, 8, 56-60.
  • Friend, M., & Cook, L., (2007). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals(5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Friend, M., & Cook, L., (1997). Student-Centered Teams in Schools: Still in Search of an Identity. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 8(1), 3-20.
  • Friend, M. (2007). The Co-Teaching Partnership. Educational Leadership, 64(5), 48-52.
  • Fontana, K. C. (2005). The effects of co-teaching on the achievement of eighth-grade students with learning disabilities. The Journal of At-Risk Issues, 11(2), 17-23.
  • Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Morris, R. D., & Lyon. G. R. (2013). Classification and definition of learning disabilities: A hybrid model. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2006). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press.
  • Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to Intervention: Preventing and Remediating Academic Difficulties. Child Dev Perspect, 3(1), 30-37.
  • Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and application. ADI Press.
  • Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.
  • Dieker, L. A. (2001). What Are the Characteristics of “Effective” Middle and High School Co-Taught Teams for Students With Disabilities? Preventing School Failure, 46, 14-23.
  • Dennis, M. S., Sharp, E., Chovanes, J., Thomas, A., Burns, R. M., Custer, B., Park, J. (2016). A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Research on Teaching Students with Mathematics Learning Difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(3), 156-168.
  • Cushman, S. (2004). What is Co-Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.corwin.com/upmdata/6847_villa_ch-1.pdf
  • Cramer, E., Liston, A., Nevin, A., & Thousand, J. (2010). Co-teaching in urban secondary school districts to meet the needs of all teachers and learners: Implications for teacher education reform. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 6(2), 59-76.
  • Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J., & Camine, D. W. (2011). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Cook, L., & Friend, M., (1995). Co-Teaching: Guidelines for Creating Effective Practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-16.
  • Cook, L. (2004). Co-teaching: Principles, Practices and Pragmatics. New Mexico Public Education Department Quarterly Special Education Meeting Albuquerque, NM April 29.
  • Cook, B. G. & Cook, S. C. (2011). Unraveling Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education, The Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 71-82.
  • Connor, D. J., & Ferri, B. A. (2007). The conflict within: resistance to co-teaching and other paradoxes in special education. Disability & Society, 22(1), 63-77.
  • Conderman, G., & Hedin, L. R. (2013). Co-Teaching With Strategy Instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49(3), 156-163.
  • Common Co-teaching Issues. (1997). Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(2), 8. Conderman, G., & Hedin, L. (2012). Purposeful assessment practices for co-teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(4), 19-27.
  • Chard, D. J., Clarke, B., Baker, S., Otterstedt, J., Braun, D., & Katz, R. (2005). Using measures of number sense to screen for difficulties in mathematics: Preliminary findings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(2), 3-14.
  • Byrnes, J. P., & Wasik, B. A. (2009). Factors predictive of mathematics achievement in kindergarten, first and third grades: An opportunity–propensity analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 167–183.
  • Bull, R., & Johnston, R. S. (1997). Children's arithmetical difficulties: Contributions from processing speed, item identification, and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 1-24.
  • Bryant-Davis, K. E., Dicker, L., Pearl, C., & Kirkpatrick, R. M. (2012). Planning in the middle: Co-planning between general and special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 22, 208-226.
  • Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. B., Gersten, R. M., Scammacca, N. N., Funk, C., Winter, A., Shih, M., & Pool, C. (2008). The Effects of Tier 2 Intervention on the Mathematics Performance of First-Grade Students Who Are at Risk for Mathematics Difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(2), 47-63.
  • Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. B., & Hammil, D. D., (2000). Characterisitic Behaviors of Students with LD Who Have Teacher-Identified Math Weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(2), 168-177.
  • Bouck, E., (2007). Co-Teaching ... Not Just a Textbook Term: Impliciations for Practice. Preventing School Failure, 51(2), 46-51.
  • Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond apttitude-achievement discrepancies to failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. In G. R. Lyon (Ed), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues(pp.163-202). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
  • Berninger, V. W., Cartwright, A. C., Yates, C. M., Swanson, H. L., & Abott, R. D. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique functional systems. Department of Educational Psychology, 6(2), 161-196.
  • Berninger, V. B., Hart, T,. Abbott, R., & Karovsky, P. (1992). Defining reading and writing disabilities with and without IQ: A Flexible, developmental perspective. Learnig Dsiabilities Quarterly, 15(2) , 103-118.
  • Berninger V. (2001). Understanding the lexia in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 23-48.
  • Becker, W. C., Engelmann, S., Carnine, D. W., & Rhine, R. (1981). The Direct Instruction Model. New York: Academic Press.
  • Beachum, L. M. Co-teaching as an Effective Instructional Delivery Model in Secodary Schools. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, Wingate University, North Carolina.
  • Bauwens, J., Hourcade, J. J., & Friend, M., (1989). Cooperative teaching; A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 17-22.
  • Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. S. (2002). A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Teaching Mathematics to Low-Achieving Students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 51-73.
  • Bailey, D. H., Siegler, R. S., & Geary, D. C. (2014). Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge. Developmental Science, 17(5), 775-785.
  • Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to Grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 699–713.
  • Adams, G. L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seatle, WA: Educational Achievement System.
  • Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary-and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478-508.