연구동향 분석
박사

혁신클러스터에서 혁신중개자가 기업의 흡수역량과 성과에 미치는 영향 : 대덕연구개발특구를 중심으로 = The Impact of Innovation Intermediaries on Firms Absorptive Capacity and Performance in Innovation Cluster: A Case of Daedeok Innopolis

이선제 2018년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 혁신클러스터에서 혁신중개자가 기업의 흡수역량과 성과에 미치는 영향 : 대덕연구개발특구를 중심으로 = The Impact of Innovation Intermediaries on Firms Absorptive Capacity and Performance in Innovation Cluster: A Case of Daedeok Innopolis' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 조절된 매개효과
  • 조절된 조절된 매개모형
  • 혁신중개자
  • 혁신클러스터
  • 혁신환경
  • 흡수역량
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
655 0

0.0%

' 혁신클러스터에서 혁신중개자가 기업의 흡수역량과 성과에 미치는 영향 : 대덕연구개발특구를 중심으로 = The Impact of Innovation Intermediaries on Firms Absorptive Capacity and Performance in Innovation Cluster: A Case of Daedeok Innopolis' 의 참고문헌

  • 혁신클러스터의 성장에 영향을 미치는 구성요인 분석: 대덕연구개발특구를 중심으로
    이선제 정영철 「기술혁신연구」, 24(1), pp. 189-219 [2016]
  • 혁신클러스터의 성과 영향요인에 관한 실증연구
    임종빈(Jongbin Yim) 정선양(Sun Yang Chung) 황두희(Doohee Hwang) 「기술혁신학회지」, 19(4), pp. 848-872 [2016]
  • 혁신클러스터 내에서의 혁신주체들 간 상호작용의 변화 대덕연구개발특구를 중심으로
    이선제 정선양 「기술혁신학회지」, 17(4), pp. 820-844 [2014]
  • 혁신체제론의 진화 및 주요 논점
    구영우 민완기 조성복 「기술 혁신학회지」, 15(2), pp. 225-241 [2012]
  • 혁신 클러스터 구축을 위한 정책방향 설정 에 관한 연구
    임종빈 정선양 조형례 「기술혁신학회지」, 15(3), pp. 675-699 [2012]
  • 최고경영진의 혁신의지와 기술혁신역량 간 관계: 연구개발 집약도의 매개효과 및 혁신지향적 조직문화의 조절효과를 중심으로
    오선희 전인 「대한경영학회지」, 29(2), pp. 213-235 [2016]
  • 지역혁신체제와 중개조직: 대덕밸리의 BI사업과 RIC사업을 중심으로
    배응환 「한국정책학회보」, 17(4), pp. 193-321 [2008]
  • 중국진출 한국기업에서 몰입형 인사시스템 이 인사관리 효과성에 미치는 영향: 경쟁전략과 본사파견인력의 조 절효과
    김성수 류성민 이용진 「인사 조직연구」, 17(1), pp. 109-148 [2009]
  • 조직의 흡수역량이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증 연구
    구철모 최정일 「경영학연구」, 37(3), pp. 515-536 [2008]
  • 조직문화의 유형과 직무만족, 조직몰입 및 혁신적 업무 행동 간의 구조적 관계: 농,수,산림협동조합을 중심으로
    신황용 이희선 47(1). 「한국행정학보」, pp. 123-147 [2013]
  • 조절분석과 조절된 매개분석 및 매개된 조절분석의 오해와 진실
    이형권 「관광연구」, 31권(3), pp. 213-248 [2016]
  • 연구개발특구진흥재단 , 「연구개발특구 통계조사 보고서」
    대전: 연 구개발특구진흥재단 [2014]
  • 연구개발특구진흥재단 , 「연구개발특구 통계조사 보고서」
    대전: 연 구개발특구진흥재단 [2017]
  • 산학협력 중개조직의 역할, 성과 및 한계 : 대학-중소기업단체간 산학협력협의회 사례를 중심으로(2005-2010)
    전 인 「한국조직학회 보」, 9(2), pp. 73-106 [2012]
  • 다중매개모델에서 bootstrapping기법을 이용한 흡수능력의 매개효과 분석
    김현우 신용호 이홍배 「한국시뮬레이션학회논문지」, 24(4), pp. 89-96 [2015]
  • 기술집약적 기업의 사회적 자본과 흡수역량이 기술사업화 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구
    강민형 노종범 「산업혁신연구」, 32(1), pp. 31-71 [2016]
  • 과학기술부,대덕전문연구단지관리본부 , 「대덕연구단지 30년사(1973 ∼2003)」
    서울 [2003]
  • 『전략적 기술경영』
    정선양 제4판, 서울: 박영사 [2016]
  • 『기술과 경영』
    정선양 제2판, 서울: 경문사 [2012]
  • 「환경정책론」
    문태훈 서울: 박영사 [1999]
  • 「혁신클러스터」
    김왕동 박재곤 복득규 임덕순 장지상 서울: 국 가균형발전위원회 [2007]
  • 「혁신 클러스터가 기업의 경영활동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연 구 : 경기도 혁신 클러스터를 중심으로」
    임종빈 건국대학교 박사학위논문 [2013]
  • 「지역혁신체제」
    김진석 이기원 서울: 국가균형발전위원회 [2007]
  • 「지역의 산업기술 혁신생태계 구 축 방안」
  • 「산업클러스터내에서 사회적 자본과 구조적 요인이 혁신성 과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 대덕연구개발특구를 중심으로」
    최병훈 서 울산업대학교 박사학위논문 [2008]
  • “효율적 지역혁신체제 구축전략”
    정선양 「기술혁신연구」, 8(1), pp. 31-48 [2000]
  • “호텔종사자들의 감정소진이 조직몰입도와 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향: 주도적 성격과 정치적 기술의 결합된 조절효과”
    이형권 「관 광연구」, 31(5), pp. 331～356 [2016]
  • “혁신클러스터 지표개발”
    장승권 최종인 홍길표 「2011년 혁신클 러스터학회 추계학술대회 발표논문집」 [2011]
  • “혁신클러스터 발전과정 및 성공요인: 대덕특구 사례를 중심 으로”
    임덕순 「혁신클러스터연구」, 1(1), pp. 15-38 [2008]
  • “혁신중개자와의 관계가 기업성과에 미치는 영향: 흡수역량의 매개효과를 중심으로”
    이선제 정선양 「기술혁신연구」, 25(4), pp. 313-340 [2017]
  • “혁신 클러스터 성공 요인 : 대덕특구를 중심으로”
    최종인 「혁신클 러스터학회지」, 1(1), pp. 67-90 [2008]
  • “통합적 지역기술정책”
    정선양 「과학기술정책동향」, 5월호, pp. 38-53 [1995]
  • “지역혁신체계론의 이론적 전개와 정책적 함의에 관한 비판 적 검토”
    권오혁 「한국응용경제학회」, 6(2), pp. 5-26 [2005]
  • “외부 자원 활용전략과 흡수역량이 중소기업 성과에 미치는 영향: 전자부품, 통신장비업체를 대상으로”
    김선영 이병헌 「기술혁신연 구」, 24(1), pp. 1-24 [2016]
  • 박사
    “연구장비 인프라의 사용자 중심 서비스혁신에 대한 연구”
    홍재근 건국대학교 박사학위논문 [2012]
  • “벤처기업의 흡수역량이 기업성과에 미치는 영향: 고객지향성의 조절효과를 중심으로”
    김수연 정강옥 「지역산업연구」, 39(1), pp. 203-231 [2016]
  • “대덕연구단지의 발전과정 및 국제비교: 혁 신클러스터관점에서”
    김왕동 유정화 임덕순 「기술혁신학회지」, 7(2), pp. 373-395 [2004]
  • “대구지역 산업클러스터 환경과 기술혁신 : R&D 역량의 매개효과와 환경불확실성의 조절효과”
    신진교 임재현 조정일 「중소기업연 구」, 36(2), pp. 169-192 [2014]
  • “대구지역 산업클러스터 환경과 기 술혁신 : 기술혁신능력과 기업가정신의 조절효과"
    김정년 신진교 임재현 조정일 「경영연구」, 27(2), pp. 165~194 [2012]
  • “기업의 기술전략과 기술기획 역량이 경영성과에 미치 는 영향 연구 : 조직유연성의 조절효과를 중심으로”
    이종민 정선양 「기술혁신학 회지」, 18(1), pp. 1-27 [2015]
  • “기업역량과 기술혁신성과에 대한 실증연 구”
    류태모 송경수 신진교 「인적자원관리연구」, 2, pp. 221-243 [2001]
  • “기업가적 지향성과 흡수역량이 중소기업의 신제품개발에 미치는 영향,”
    권정언 우형록 「기술혁신연구」, 21(2), pp. 57-84 [2013]
  • “국가혁신체제의 요소들이 혁신클러스터의 성과에 미치는 영향: 사회적 자본의 조절효과를 중심으로”
    김은영 정진섭 「국제 지역연 구」, 21(2), pp. 31-67 [2012]
  • “개방형 혁신과 흡수역량의 공진화: 한국 중소기업의 혁신경로 관점”
    Sohn, Dong-Won 손동원 「경영과학」, 29(3), pp. 169-182 [2012]
  • “EasyFlow 회귀분석”
    이일현 서울: 한나래출판사 [2014]
  • Zhang, Y. and Li, H.Y. (2010), "Innovation Search of New Ventures in a Technology Cluster: The Role of Ties with Service Intermediaries", Strategic Management J ournal, 31, pp. 88-109.
  • Zahra, S.A., Ucbasaran, D. and Newey, L. R. (2009), “Social Knowledge and SMEs' Innovative Gains from Internationalization", European Management Review, 6(2), pp. 81-93.
  • Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002), “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension”, Academy of Management Review, 27, pp. 185-203.
  • Yusuf, S. (2008), "Intermediating Knowledge Exchange between Universities and Businesses", Research Policy, 37, pp. 1167-1174.
  • Yesil, S. and Kaya, A. (2013), "The Effect of Organizational Culture on Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from a Developing Country", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, pp. 428-437.
  • Wu, J. and Xu, M. (2013), "Technology Intermediaries and Regional Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study in China", Asian J ournal of Technology Innovation, 21(S2), pp. 7-19.
  • Winch, G. M. and Courtney, R. (2007), “The Organization of Innovation Brokers: An international review”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(6), pp. 747-763.
  • Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J. and Kale, D. (2015), "National Innovation Systems and the Intermediary Role of Industry Associations in Building Institutional Capacities for Innovation in Developing Countries: A Critical Review of the Literature", Research Policy, 44, pp. 1407-1418.
  • Wales, W.J., Parida, V. and Patel, P.C. (2013), "Too Much of a Good Thing? Absorptive Capacity, Firm Performance, and the Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation", Strategic Management J ournal, 34(5), pp. 622-633.
  • Valmohammadi, C. and Roshanzamir, S. (2015), "The Guidelines of Improvement: Relations among Organizational Culture, TQM and Performance". International J ournal of Production Economics, 164, pp. 167-178.
  • Tzokas, N., Kim, Y.A., Akbar, H. and Al-Dajani, H. (2015), “Absorptive Capacity and Performance: The Role of Customer Relationship and Technological Capabilities in High-tech SMEs”, Industrial Marketing Management, 47, pp. 134-142.
  • Tseng, S.M. (2010), "The Correlation between Organizational Culture and Knowledge Conversion on Corporate Performance", J ournal of knowledge management, 14(2), pp. 269-284.
  • Todorova, G. and Durisin, B. (2007), "Absorptive Capacity: Valuing a Reconceptualization", Academy of Management Review, 32, pp. 774-786.
  • Tidd, J. and Bessant, J.R. (2013), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th Ed., Chichester: Wiley.
  • Teece, D.J. (1986), “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy”, Research Policy, 15, pp. 286-305.
  • T dtling, F. and Trippl, M. (2005), "One Size Fits All?: Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation Policy Approach", Research policy, 34(8), pp. 1203-1219.
  • Suvinen, N., Konttinen, J. and Nieminen, M. (2010), "How Necessary are Intermediary Organizations in the Commercialization of Research", European Planning Studies, 18, pp. 1365-1389.
  • Stewart, J. and Hyysalo, S. (2008), "Intermediaries, Users and Social Learning in Technological Innovation", International J ournal of Innovation Management, 12, pp. 295-325.
  • Smedlund, A. (2006), "The Roles of Intermediaries in a Regional Knowledge System", Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(2), pp. 204-220.
  • Shou, Y., Chen, Y. and Feng, Y. (2013), "The Impact of Intermediaries on Innovation Performance at Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises in the Yangtze River Delta", Asian J ournal of Technology Innovation, 21(S2), pp. 20-30.
  • Schein, E. H. (1984), “Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture”, Sloan Management Review, 25(2), pp. 3-16.
  • Saxenian, A. (1996), Regional advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  • Porter, M. (1998), “Clusters and the New Economic of Competition”, Harvard Business Review, 76(6), pp. 77-90.
  • Patterson, W. and Ambrosini, V. (2015), "Configuring Absorptive Capacity as a Key Process for Research Intensive Firms", Technovation, 36, pp. 77-89.
  • PROCESS macro를 이용한 매개분석조절분석 및 조절된 매개분석
    이형권 신영사 [2015]
  • P yh nen, A. and Smedlund, A. (2004), "Assessing Intellectual Capital Creation in Regional Clusters", Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(3), pp. 351-365.
  • OECD (2002), Dynamising National Systems of Innovation, Paris: OECD.
  • OECD (1999), Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, Paris: OECD.
  • Nelson, R. (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 22(2), pp. 242-266.
  • Munkongsujarit, S. (2013), The Impact of Social Capital on Innovation Intermediaries, Ph.D. Dissertation in Technology Management, Portland State University.
  • Mohammad, B. (2015), "Towards Increased Understanding of Innovation Intermediaries", Ph.D. Dissertation in Management Science, University of Waterloo.
  • March, J.G. (1991), "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning", Organization Science, 2, pp. 71-88.
  • Major, E.J. and Cordey-Hayes, M. (2000), "Engaging the Business Support Network to give SMEs the Benefit of Foresight", Technovation, 20(11), pp. 589-602.
  • Lundvall, B.A. (2007), "National Innovation Systems—Analytical Concept and Development Tool", Industry and Innovation, 14(1), pp. 95-119
  • Lundvall, B.A. (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter.
  • Lopez-Vega, H. and Vanhaverbeke, W. (2009), “Connecting Open and Closed Innovation Markets: A Typology Intermediaries”, DIME Conference Organizing for Networked Innovation, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
  • Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K.K. and Hua, Z. (2013), "The Impact of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility", Decision Support Systems, 54(3), pp. 1452-1462.
  • Lin, H., Zeng, S., Liu, H. and Li, C. (2016), "How do Intermediaries Drive Corporate Innovation? A Moderated Mediating Examination", J ournal of Business Research, 69(11): pp. 4831-4836.
  • Lim, H. and Park, Y. (2010), "Identification of Technological Knowledge Intermediaries", Scientometrics, 84(3), pp. 543-561.
  • Lichtenthaler, U. and Ernst, H. (2008), "Intermediary Services in the Markets for Technology: Organizational Antecedents and Performance Consequences", Organization Studies, 29(7), pp. 1003-1035.
  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2013), "The Collaboration of Innovation Intermediaries and Manufacturing Firms in the Markets for Technology", J ournal of Product Innovation Management, 30(S1), pp. 142-158.
  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2009), "Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes", Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), pp. 822-846.
  • Lewin, A.Y., Massini, S. and Peeters, C. (2011), "Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines", Organization Science, 22(1), pp. 81–98.
  • Levin, D.Z. and Cross, R. (2004), “The Strength of Weak Ties You can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer", Management Science, 50(11), pp. 1477-1490.
  • Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B. and Park, J. (2010), "Open Innovation in SMEs—An Intermediated Network Model", Research Policy, 39(2), pp. 290-300.
  • Lee, K. (2003), "Promoting Innovative Clusters through the Regional Research Centre (RRC) Policy Programme in Korea", European Planning Studies, 11, pp. 25-29
  • Leal-Rodr gueza, A.L., Ariza-Montes, J.A., Rold n, J.L. and Leal-Mill n, A.G. (2014), “Absorptive Capacity, Innovation and Cultural Barriers: A Conditional Mediation Model”, J ournal of Business Research, 67, pp. 763-768.
  • Lau, A.K. and Lo, W. (2015), "Regional Innovation System, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study". Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, pp. 99-114.
  • Lane, P., Koka, B.R. and Pathak, S. (2006), "The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct", Academy of Management Review, 31, pp. 833-863.
  • Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M. and Ioannou, G. (2011), "Absorptive Capacity, Innovation, and Financial Performance", J ournal of Business Research, 64(12), pp. 1335-1343.
  • Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. (2009), "Establishment and Embedding of Innovation Brokers at Different Innovation System Levels: Insights from the Dutch Agricultural Sector", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, pp. 849-860.
  • Kivimaa, P. (2014), "Government-affiliated Intermediary Organisations as Actors in System-level Transitions", Research Policy, 43, pp. 1370-1380.
  • Kirkels, Y. and Duysters, G. (2010), "Brokerage in SME Networks", Research Policy, 39, pp. 375-385.
  • Kim, K., Choi, Y., Choi, C. and Kim, H. (2010), "The Role of Intermediaries on Technological Risk Management and Business Development Performance in Korea", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(6), pp. 870-880.
  • Jansen, J.J.P., Van den Bosch, F.A.J. and Volberda, H.W. (2005), "Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How do Organizational Antecedents Matter?", Academy of Management J ournal, 48(6), pp. 999-1015.
  • Iturrioz, C., Arag n, C. and Narvaiza, L. (2015), "How to Foster Shared Innovation within SMEs' Networks: Social Capital and the Role of Intermediaries", European Management J ournal, 33, pp. 104-115.
  • Inkpen, A.C. and Tsang, E.W.K. (2005), “Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer,” Academy of Management Review, 30(1), pp. 146–165.
  • Inkinen, T. and Suorsa, K., (2010), "Intermediaries in Regional Innovation Systems: High-Technology Enterprise Survey from Northern Finland", European Planning Studies, 18(2), pp. 169-187
  • Howells, J. (2006), “Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation”, Research Policy, 35(5), pp. 715-728.
  • Hayes, A.F. (2017), "Partial, Conditional, and Moderated Moderated Mediation: Quantification, Inference, and Interpretation", Communication Monographs, pp. 1-37.
  • Hayes, A.F. (2015), "An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation", Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, pp. 1-22.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G. and Smith, A. (2013), "Grassroots Innovations in Community Energy: The Role of Intermediaries in Niche Development", Global Environmental Change, 23, pp. 868-880.
  • Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R.I. (1997), "Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm", Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), pp. 716-749.
  • Hakanson, L., Caessens, P. and MacAulay, S. (2011), "InnovationXchange: A Case Study in Innovation Intermediation", Innovation, 13(2), pp. 261-274.
  • Guo, J. and Guo, B. (2013), “How do Innovation Intermediaries Facilitate Knowledge Spillovers within Industrial Clusters; A Knowledge-processing Perspective”, Asian J ournal of Technology Innovation, 21(S2), pp. 31-49.
  • Gassmann, O., Daiber, M. and Enkel, E. (2011), "The Role of Intermediaries in Cross-industry Innovation Processes", R&D Management, 41(5), pp. 457-469.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2001), “Social Capital, Civil Society and Development", Third World Quarterly, 22(1), pp. 7-20.
  • Freeman, C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London/New York: Pinter Publishers.
  • Flatten, T.C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S.A. and Brettel, M. (2011), "A Measure of Absorptive Capacity: Scale Development and Validation", European Management J ournal, 29, pp. 98-116.
  • Ferreras-M ndez, J.L., Newell, S., Fern ndez-Mesa, A. and Alegre, J. (2015), "Depth and Breadth of External Knowledge Search and Performance: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capacity", Industrial Marketing Management, 47, pp. 86-97.
  • Feldman, M.P. (2014), "The Character of Innovative Places: Entrepreneurial Strategy, Economic Development, and Prosperity", Small Business Economics, 43(1), pp. 9-20.
  • Ellonen, H. K., Jantunen, A.R.I. and Kuivalainen, O. (2011), "The Role of Dynamic Capabilities in Developing Innovation-related Capabilities", International Journal of Innovation Management, 15, pp. 459–478.
  • Ellinger, A.D., Ellinger, A.E., Yang, B. and Howton, S.W. (2002), "The Relationship between the Learning Organization Concept and Firm’s Financial Performance: An Empirical Assessment". Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1), pp. 5-21.
  • EDA (2011), Annual Report for to Congress, Fiscal Year 2011, US: Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration.
  • Dossou-Yovo, A. and Tremblay, D. (2012), “Public Policy, Intermediaries and Innovation System Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Quebec and Ontario”, The Innovation J ournal, 7(1), pp. 2-20.
  • Doloreux, D. (2002), “What We should Know about Regional Systems of Innovation”, Technology in Society, 24, pp. 243-263.
  • Diener, K. and Piller, F. (2010), "The Market for Open Innovation: Increasing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Innovation process", RWTH Aachen University, Technology & Innovation Management Group, Aachen, Germany.
  • Davenport, S. (2005), "Exploring the Role of Proximity in SME Knowledge-Acquisition", Research Policy, 34, pp. 683-701.
  • Dalziel, M. (2010), “Why do Innovation Intermediaries Exit?”, Paper presented at the Summer Conference 2010(pp. 1-23) on "Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology" at Imperial College London Business School.
  • Cooke, P., Uranga, M.G. and Etxebarria, G. (1998), "Regional Systems of Innovation: An Evolutionary Perspective", Environment and Planning, 30, pp. 1563-1584.
  • Cooke, P., Uranga, M.G. and Etxebarria, G. (1997), "Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organisational Dimensions", Research Policy, 26, pp. 475-491.
  • Colombo, G., Dell'Era C. and Frattini, F. (2015), “Exploring the Contribution of Innovation Intermediaries to the New Product Development (NPD) Process: A Typology and an Empirical Study”, R&D Management, 45(2), pp. 104–146.
  • Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 99(35), pp. 128-152.
  • Chung, S. (2002), “Building a National Innovation System through Regional Innovation Systems", Technovation, 22(8), pp. 485-491.
  • Chung, S. (1999), “Regional Innovation System in Korea”, Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, August 30 ~ September 2, 1999.
  • Chesbrough, H. (2006), Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Cant , C., Ylim ki, J., Sir n, C.A. and Nickell, D. (2015), "The Role of Knowledge Intermediaries in Co-managed Innovations", J ournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(8), pp. 951-961.
  • Cameron, K.S. and Quinn, R.E., (2005), Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework, Third ed., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Burt, R.S. (2004), “Structural Holes and Good Ideas,” The American J ournal of Sociology, 110(2), pp. 349-399.
  • Burt, R.S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Boon, W.P.C., Moors, E.H.M., Kuhlmann, S. and Smits, R.E.H.M. (2011), "Demandarticulation in Emerging Technologies: Intermediary User Organisations as Co-producers?", Research Policy, 40, pp. 242-252.
  • Bessant, J. and Rush, H. (1995), “Building Bridges for Innovation: The Role of Consultants in Technology Transfer”, Research Policy, 24, pp. 97–114.
  • Bendis, R.A., Seline, R.S. and Byler, E.J. (2008), “A New Direction for Technology-based Economic Development: The Role of Innovation Intermediaries”, Industry and Higher Education, 22, pp. 73–90.
  • Ben Letaifa, S. and Rabeau, Y. (2013), "Too Close to Collaborate? How Geographic Proximity Could Impede Entrepreneurship and Innovation", J ournal of Business Research, 66, pp. 2071–2078.
  • Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations", J ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp. 1173-1182.
  • Bakici, T., Almirall, E. and Wareham, J. (2013), "The Role of Public Open Innovation Intermediaries in Local Government and the Public Sector", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(3), pp. 311-327.
  • Assink, M. (2006), “Inhibitors of Disruptive Innovation Capability: A Conceptual Model”, European J ournal of Innovation Management, 9(2), pp. 215–233.
  • Acosta, M., Azagra-Caro, J.M. and Coronado, D. (2016), “Access to Universities' Public Knowledge: Who is More Regionalist?”, Regional Studies, 50(3), pp. 446-459.