연구동향 분석
박사

Characteristics and solid-state anaerobic digestion condition of bedded pack barn cattle manure = 깔짚 함유 우분의 특성 및 고상혐기소화 조건에 관한 연구

최용준 2018년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' Characteristics and solid-state anaerobic digestion condition of bedded pack barn cattle manure = 깔짚 함유 우분의 특성 및 고상혐기소화 조건에 관한 연구' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • Batch digester
  • High solids manure
  • Semi-continuous batch digester
  • particle-size
  • sawdust
  • solid-state anaerobic digestion
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
114 0

0.0%

' Characteristics and solid-state anaerobic digestion condition of bedded pack barn cattle manure = 깔짚 함유 우분의 특성 및 고상혐기소화 조건에 관한 연구' 의 참고문헌

  • Yerramsetti, V. S., N. Gauravarapu Navlur, V. Rapolu, N. S. K. Dhulipala, P. R. Sinha, S. Srinavasan, and G. R. Anupoju. 2013. Role of nitrogen oxides, black carbon, and meteorological parameters on the variation of surface ozone levels at a tropical urban site–Hyderabad, India. Clean–Soil Air Water. 41:215–225.
  • Yenig n, O., and B. Demirel. 2013. Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: A review. Process Biochem. 48:901–911.
  • Yamashiro, T., S. A. Lateef, C. Ying, N. Beneragama, M. Lukic, I. Masahiro, I. Ihara, T. Nishida, and K. Umetsu. 2013. Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy cow manure and high concentrated food processing waste. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 15:539–547.
  • Wright, W. F. 2005. Dairy manure particle size distribution, properties, and implications for manure handling and treatment. In: 2005 ASAE Annual Meeting. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. p. 1.
  • Wellinger, A., J. D. Murphy, and D. Baxter. 2013. The biogas handbook: science, production and applications. Elsevier.
  • Ward, A. J., P. J. Hobbs, P. J. Holliman, and D. L. Jones. 2008. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour. Technol. 99:7928– 7940.
  • Wang, Y., Y. Zhang, J. Wang, and L. Meng. 2009. Effects of volatile fatty acid concentrations on methane yield and methanogenic bacteria. Biomass Bioenergy. 33:848–853.
  • Wang, X., X. Lu, F. Li, and G. Yang. 2014. Effects of temperature and carbonnitrogen (C/N) ratio on the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, chicken manure and rice straw: Focusing on ammonia inhibition. PLOS ONE. 9:e97265.
  • Wang, X., G. Yang, Y. Feng, G. Ren, and X. Han. 2012. Optimizing feeding composition and carbon–nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 120:78–83.
  • Vigueras-Carmona, S. E., M. M. Trujillo, G. M. Rivero, M. I. Venegas, and Z. G. Jim nez. 2016. Effect of particle size on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of thermally pre-treated waste activated sludge. J. Biotech Res. 7:11.
  • UN. 2005. World summit outcome. UN Doc No A60L. 1.
  • Tritt, W. P., and H. Kang. 1991. Ultimate biodegradability and decay rates of cow paunch manure under anaerobic conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 36:161–165.
  • Triolo, J. M., S. G. Sommer, H. B. M ller, M. R. Weisbjerg, and X. Y. Jiang. 2011. A new algorithm to characterize biodegradability of biomass during anaerobic digestion: influence of lignin concentration on methane production potential. Bioresour. Technol. 102:9395–9402.
  • Tiarks, A. E., A. P. Mazurak, and L. Chesnin. 1974. Physical and chemical properties of soil associated with heavy applications of manure from cattle Feedlots 1. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 38:826–830.
  • Tanimu, M. I., T. I. M. Ghazi, R. M. Harun, and A. Idris. 2014. Effect of carbon to nitrogen ratio of food waste on biogas methane production in a batch mesophilic anaerobic digester. Int. J. Innov. Manag. Technol. 5:116.
  • Strik, D. P. B. T. B., A. M. Domnanovich, and P. Holubar. 2006. A pH-based control of ammonia in biogas during anaerobic digestion of artificial pig manure and maize silage. Process Biochem. 41:1235–1238.
  • Steinberg, L. M., and J. M. Regan. 2011. Response of lab-scale methanogenic reactors inoculated from different sources to organic loading rate shocks. Bioresour. Technol. 102:8790–8798.
  • Standard, V. D. I. 2006. VDI 4630 Fermentation of organic materials. Charact. Substrate Sampl. Collect. Mater. Data Ferment. Tests. 92.
  • Shin, K. S. 2002. Application of electron beam irradiation for effective wastewater sludge treatment. Ph. D Thesis. Dep. Environmental Engineering. Chungnam Nat. Univ. Korea.
  • Schulte, P. M. 2015. The effects of temperature on aerobic metabolism: towards a mechanistic understanding of the responses of ectotherms to a changing environment. J. Exp. Biol. 218:1856–1866.
  • Schink, B. 1997. Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:262–280.
  • Roos, K. 2003. A Comparison of dairy cattle manure management with and without anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Flagstar Program. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC.
  • Rasi, S., A. Veijanen, and J. Rintala. 2007. Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants. Energy. 32:1375–1380.
  • Poppi, D. P., B. W. Norton, D. J. Minson, and R. E. Hendricksen. 1980. The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. J. Agric. Sci. 94:275–280.
  • Pigman, W. W. 2012. Chemistry of the Carbohydrates. Elsevier.
  • Parra Orobio, B. A., P. Torres Lozada, L. F. Marmolejo-Rebell n, B. A. Parra Orobio, P. Torres Lozada, and L. F. Marmolejo Rebell n. 2017. Anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste for the production of renewable energy: Effect of particle size. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 34:481–491.
  • Parkin Gene F., and Owen William F. 1986. Fundamentals of Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Sludges. J. Environ. Eng. 112:867–920.
  • Parawira, W., M. Murto, R. Zvauya, and B. Mattiasson. 2004. Anaerobic batch digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet leaves. Renew. Energy. 29:1811–1823.
  • Owen, W. F., D. C. Stuckey, J. B. Healy, L. Y. Young, and P. L. McCarty. 1979. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 13:485–492.
  • Nurk, L., L. B hle, and M. Wachendorf. 2016. Degradation of Fibre and Non-fibre Fractions During Anaerobic Digestion in Silages of Maize, Sunflower and Sorghum-Sudangrass of Different Maturities. BioEnergy Res. 9:720–730.
  • Ndon, U. J., and R. R. Dague. 1997. Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic sequencing batch reactor treatment of low-strength wastewater. Water Res. 31:2455–2466.
  • National Academies of Sciences, E. 2016. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle: Eighth Revised Edition.
  • Nasir Ismail M., Mohd Ghazi Tinia I., and Omar Rozita. 2012. Anaerobic digestion technology in livestock manure treatment for biogas production: A review. Eng. Life Sci. 12:258–269.
  • Narihiro, T., and Y. Sekiguchi. 2007. Microbial communities in anaerobic digestion processes for waste and wastewater treatment: a microbiological update. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18:273–278.
  • Nakakubo, R., H. B. M ller, A. M. Nielsen, and J. Matsuda. 2008. Ammonia Inhibition of Methanogenesis and Identification of Process Indicators during Anaerobic Digestion. Environ. Eng. Sci. 25:1487–1496.
  • Mueller, R. F., and A. Steiner. 1992. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion caused by heavy metals. Water Sci. Technol. 26:835–846.
  • Mieldazys, R., E. Jotautiene, A. Jasinskas, and A. Aboltins. 2017. Evaluation of physical mechanical properties of experimental granulated cattle manure compost fertilizer. In: proceedings of the international scientific conference. Latvia University of Agriculture.
  • Meyer, D., P. L. Ristow, and M. Lie. 2007. Particle size and nutrient distribution in fresh dairy manure. Appl. Eng. Agric. 23:113–118.
  • Martz, F. A., and R. L. Belyea. 1986. Role of particle size and forage quality in digestion and passage by cattle and sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 69:1996–2008.
  • Mao, C., Y. Feng, X. Wang, and G. Ren. 2015. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 45:540–555.
  • Mahnert, P., M. Heiermann, and B. Linke. 2005. Batch- and Semi-continuous Biogas Production from Different Grass Species.
  • Maharaj, I., and P. Elefsiniotis. 2001. The role of HRT and low temperature on the acid-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal and industrial wastewaters. Bioresour. Technol. 76:191–197.
  • Machacek, K. J., and P. J. Kononoff. 2009. The Relationship Between Acid Detergent Insoluble Nitrogen and Nitrogen Digestibility in Lactating Dairy Cattle. Prof. Anim. Sci. 25:701–708.
  • Lorimor, J., W. Powers, and A. Sutton. 2000. Manure characteristics, MWPS-18. Ames Iowa MidWest Plan Serv. Iowa State Univ.
  • Liu, C., X. Yuan, G. Zeng, W. Li, and J. Li. 2008. Prediction of methane yield at optimum pH for anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 99:882–888.
  • Linke, B., M. Heiermann, and J. Mumme. 2006. Results of monitoring the pilot plants Pirow and Clausnitz. Solid-State Dig. Art Furth. RD Requir. 24:112–130.
  • Licitra, G., T. M. Hernandez, and P. J. Van Soest. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 57:347–358.
  • Li, J., L. Wei, Q. Duan, G. Hu, and G. Zhang. 2014. Semi-continuous anaerobic codigestion of dairy manure with three crop residues for biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 156:307–313.
  • Lee, D. J., S. Y. Lee, J. S. Bae, J. G. Kang, K. H. Kim, S. S. Rhee, J. H. Park, J. S. Cho, J. Chung, and D. C. Seo. 2015. Effect of volatile fatty acid concentration on anaerobic degradation rate from field anaerobic digestion facilities treating food waste leachate in South Korea. J. Chem.
  • Lay, J.-J., Y.-Y. Li, and T. Noike. 1998. The influence of pH and ammonia concentration on the methane production in high-solids digestion processes. Water Environ. Res. 70:1075–1082.
  • Lay, J.-J., Y.-Y. Li, and T. Noike. 1997. Influences of pH and moisture content on the methane production in high-solids sludge digestion. Water Res. 31:1518– 1524.
  • Kim, M., Y.-H. Ahn, and R. E. Speece. 2002. Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic. Water Res. 36:4369–4385.
  • Kim, J. K., B. R. Oh, Y. N. Chun, and S. W. Kim. 2006. Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 102:328–332.
  • Kim, E., S. Lee, H. Jo, J. Jeong, W. Mulbry, S. Rhaman, and H. Ahn. 2018. Solid- State Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure from a Sawdust-Bedded Pack Barn: Moisture Responses. Energies. 11:484.
  • Kim, D., K. Lee, and K. Y. Park. 2014. Hydrothermal carbonization of anaerobically digested sludge for solid fuel production and energy recovery. Fuel. 130:120– 125.
  • Khalid, A., M. Arshad, M. Anjum, T. Mahmood, and L. Dawson. 2011. The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Manag. 31:1737-1744.
  • Kang, H., and P. Weiland. 1993. Ultimate anaerobic biodegradability of some agroindustrial residues. Bioresour. Technol. 43:107–111.
  • Kafle, G. K., and L. Chen. 2016. Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models. Waste Manag. 48:492–502.
  • Jin, P., S. K. Bhattacharya, C. J. Williams, and H. Zhang. 1998. Effects of sulfide addition on copper inhibition in methanogenic system. Water Res. 32:977– 988.
  • Izumi, K., Y. Okishio, N. Nagao, C. Niwa, S. Yamamoto, and T. Toda. 2010. Effects of particle size on anaerobic digestion of food waste. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 64:601–608.
  • Institute of Livestock Environmental Management. 2016. Livestock Environmental Information Map Service.
  • Hills, D. J. 1979. Effects of carbon: Nitrogen ratio on anaerobic digestion of dairy manure. Agric. Wastes. 1:267–278.
  • Hendriksen, H. V., and B. K. Ahring. 1991. Effects of ammonia on growth and morphology of thermophilic hydrogen-oxidizing methanogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 85:241–245.
  • Hansen, K. H., I. Angelidaki, and B. K. Ahring. 1999. Improving thermophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Water Res. 33:1805–1810.
  • Hamdi, M. 1991. Effects of agitation and pretreatment on the batch anaerobic digestion of olive mil. Bioresour. Technol. 36:173–178.
  • Hall, M. B. 2007. Methodological challenges in carbohydrate analyses. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 36:359–367.
  • Hajji, A., and M. Rhachi. 2013. The Influence of Particle Size on the Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Solid Waste. Energy Procedia. 36:515–520.
  • Guendouz, J., P. Buffi re, J. Cacho, M. Carr re, and J.-P. Delgenes. 2010. Dry anaerobic digestion in batch mode: design and operation of a laboratory-scale, completely mixed reactor. Waste Manag. 30:1768–1771.
  • Guarino, G., C. Carotenuto, F. Di Cristofaro, S. Papa, B. Morrone, and M. Minale. 2016. Does the C/N ratio really affect the Bio-methane Yield? A three years investigation of Buffalo Manure Digestion. Chem. Eng. Trans. 49.
  • Goux, X., M. Calusinska, M. Foss pr , E. Benizri, and P. Delfosse. 2016. Start-up phase of an anaerobic full-scale farm reactor–Appearance of mesophilic anaerobic conditions and establishment of the methanogenic microbial community. Bioresour. Technol. 212:217–226.
  • Gervais, P., and P. Molin. 2003. The role of water in solid-state fermentation. Biochem. Eng. J. 13:85–101.
  • Gerardi, M. H. 2003. The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gallert, C., and J. Winter. 1997. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic wastes: effect of ammonia on glucose degradation and methane production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 48:405–410.
  • Fujishima, S., T. Miyahara, and T. Noike. 2000. Effect of moisture content on anaerobic digestion of dewatered sludge: ammonia inhibition to carbohydrate removal and methane production. Water Sci. Technol. 41:119–127.
  • Erickson, G. E., B. Auvermann, R. Eigenberg, L. W. Greene, T. Klopfenstein, and R. Koelsch. 2003. Proposed beef cattle manure excretion and characteristics standard for ASAE. In: Animal, Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes-IX. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. p. 1.
  • Duan, N., B. Dong, B. Wu, and X. Dai. 2012. High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions: Feasibility study. Bioresour. Technol. 104:150–156.
  • Drosg, B. 2013. Process monitoring in biogas plants, IEA Bioenergy. Energy Technol. Netw. 12–13.
  • Dou, Z., D. T. Galligan, R. D. Allshouse, J. D. Toth, C. F. Ramberg, and J. D. Ferguson. 2001. Manure sampling for nutrient analysis: variability and sampling efficacy. J. Environ. Qual. 30:1432–1437.
  • Dioha, I. J., C. H. Ikeme, T. Nafi’u, N. I. Soba, and M. B. S. Yusuf. 2013. Effect of carbon to nitrogen ratio on biogas production. Int. Res. J. Nat. Sci. 1:1–10.
  • Demirer, G. N., and S. Chen. 2005. Two-phase anaerobic digestion of unscreened dairy manure. Process Biochem. 40:3542–3549.
  • Dai, X., H. Yan, N. Li, J. He, Y. Ding, L. Dai, and B. Dong. 2016. Metabolic adaptation of microbial communities to ammonium stress in a high solid anaerobic digester with dewatered sludge. Sci. Rep. 6:28193.
  • Connaughton, S., G. Collins, and V. O’Flaherty. 2006. Psychrophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion of brewery effluent: A comparative study. Water Res. 40:2503–2510.
  • Cioabla, A., I. Ionel, G.-A. Dumitrel, and F. Popescu. 2012. Comparative study on factors affecting anaerobic digestion of agricultural vegetal residues. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 5:39.
  • Choi, Y. J., and S. R. Lee. 2015. Review of database configuration of manure characteristics, analysis methods, Bio-methane Potential Test for High Solid Manure Recycling. J. Anim. Environ. Sci. 21:9–20.
  • Chen, Y., J. J. Cheng, and K. S. Creamer. 2008. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 99:4044–4064.
  • Chaney, A. L., and E. P. Marbach. 1962. Modified reagents for determinationofureaandammonia.Clin.Chem.8:130-132.
  • Chae, K. J., A. Jang, S. K. Yim, and I. S. Kim. 2008. The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Bioresour. Technol. 99:1–6.
  • Cha, G. C., and T. Noike. 1997. Effect of rapid temperature change and HRT on anaerobic acidogenesis. Water Sci. Technol. 36:247–253.
  • Buffiere, P., D. Loisel, N. Bernet, and J.-P. Delgenes. 2006. Towards new indicators for the prediction of solid waste anaerobic digestion properties. Water Sci. Technol. 53:233–241.
  • Barber, W. P., and D. C. Stuckey. 1999. The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res. 33:1559–1578.
  • Bajpai, P. 2017. Basics of anaerobic digestion process. In: anaerobic technology in pulp and paper Industry. Springer, Singapore. p. 7–12.
  • Baere, L. de, and B. Mattheeuws. 2010. Anaerobic digestion of MSW in Europe. BioCycle. 51:24–26.
  • Babaee, A., and J. Shayegan. 2011. Effect of organic loading rates (OLR) on production of methane from anaerobic digestion of vegetables waste. In: World Renewable Energy Congress-Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011; Link ping; Sweden. Link ping University Electronic Press. p. 411–417.
  • Association, E. B. 2015. EBA Biomethane & Biogas Report 2015. Eur. Biogas Assoc. Belg.
  • Angelidaki, I., and W. Sanders. 2004. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 3:117–129.
  • Ali Shah, F., Q. Mahmood, M. Maroof Shah, A. Pervez, and S. Ahmad Asad. 2014. Microbial ecology of anaerobic digesters: the key players of anaerobiosis. Sci. World J. 2014.
  • Ahn, G. C., S. S. Jang, K. Y. Lee, W. S. Kwak, Y. K. Oh, and K. K. Park. 2016. Characteristics of sawdust and cocopeat beddings, and their usefulness according to the fan and pen location for rearing Hanwoo cattle. Asian- Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 29:444–454.
  • ASAE. 2001. ASAE STANDARDS 2001: Standards Engineering Practices Data.
  • APHA, A. 1995. WPCF, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Am. Public Health Assoc. Water Works Assoc. Environ. Fed. Wash. DC USA.
  • AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International 18th edition.