연구동향 분석
박사

학업성취도 격차와 학교 교육 : PISA 2003-2015분석을 중심으로

이호준 2018년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 학업성취도 격차와 학교 교육 : PISA 2003-2015분석을 중심으로' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 교육
  • 교육 불평등
  • 교육의 공공성
  • 교육정책
  • 분해분석
  • 학교교육
  • 학업성취도 격차
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,946 0

0.0%

' 학업성취도 격차와 학교 교육 : PISA 2003-2015분석을 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • 연합뉴스 비정규직 세습될 가능성 높다“ [2015]
  • 국가재정운용계획 교육 분과위원회 2013~2017 국가재정운용계획 [2014]
  • 교육부 2016년 교육부 업무계획 [2016]
  • 교육부 경제‧사회 양극화에 대응한 교육복지 정책의 방향과 과제 [2017]
  • 현대재정학(제5판)
    김동건 서울: 박영사 [2005]
  • 헌법개설(제13판)
    김철수 서울: 박영사 [2013]
  • 허울뿐인 공교육: 교육의 상품화와 실패의 조직화
    한숭희 사회비평, 38, 52-68 [2007]
  • 행정민주주의와 공공성: 심의민주주의와의 접목
    정무권 사회과학연구, 50(2), 33-80 [2011]
  • 행복교육
    교육부 창의인재 양성 2013 대통령 업무보고 [2013]
  • 한국교육의 발전 전략과 새로운 과제
  • 한국 역대정권의 주요 경제정책. 한국경제연구원
    박진근 정책연구 2009-06 [2009]
  • 한국 공교육의 이념. 황원철, 김성열, 고창규 저
    정재걸 공교육: 이념･제도･ 개혁, p. 29~48 [2004]
  • 학생 선발정책과 2002 대입제도의 쟁점 분석
    김동석 교육문제연구, 13, 19-49 [2000]
  • 학교교육의 위기와 공교육 이념의 재검토
    나병현 아시아교육연구, 2(2), 139-159 [2001]
  • 학교개혁론: 쟁점과 과제
  • 하여진, 박민호. ICT 활용 유형에 따른 학습자 특성 및 성취도에 대한 혼합모형 분석
    박현정 교육평가연구, 24(3), 733-754 [2011]
  • 프리미엄 조선(2016. 07. 12.). 서울대 지역격차 해소?
    강남 3구 여전히 강세. http://premi um.chosun. com/site/data/html _dir/2016/07/12 /2016071200375.html에서 인용 [2017]
  • 최신교육학개론(개정･증보)
    김종서 이영덕 정원식 서울: 교육과학사 [2009]
  • 지역 내 소득불평등도에 따른 주민참여
    금현섭 현승숙 한국행정학보, 45(2), 159-186 [2011]
  • 중학교에서의 학업탄력성 추이 분석 및 학교수준에서의 영향요인 탐색
    박현정(朴炫貞) 석유미(石唯美) 이진실(李眞實) 아시아교육연구, 17(4), 193-213 [2016]
  • 중국의 도농 간 교육격차 현황 및 해소 방안
    이수진 교육정책네트워크 기 획기사 [2017]
  • 존 듀이의 진보적 교육은 호러스 먼의 보통교육으로 회귀한 것인 가?
    김상현 교육철학연구, 37(3), 27-49 [2015]
  • 정책학원론(제2전정판)
    노화준 서울: 박영사 [2009]
  • 재정학(제3판)
    이준구 서울: 다산출판사 [2008]
  • 재생산: 교육체계 이론을 위한 요소들 (이 상호 역). 서울: 동문선
    Bourdieu, P. Passeron, J. C. (원서출판 1970) [1970]
  • 자본주의와 학교교육 (이규환 역). 서울: 사계절
    Bowles, S. Gintis, H. (원서출판 1976) [1976]
  • 일본의 가정의 사회경제적 배경으로 인한 교육격차 현황 및 해소 방안
    김지영 교육정책네트워크 기획기사 [2017]
  • 이정선, 이지혜, 이 화정, 허남순, 홍봉선 교육복지의 이론과 실제
  • 이성은, 이현국, 정승환, 유지은, 정설미, 정지혜, 조태원, 정동욱. 단위학교의 교육책무성과 교사의 인적자본 및사회적 자본 관계 분 석
    양민석 이호준 교육행정학연구, 33, 393-412 [2015]
  • 유지은, & 정동욱. 국가 간 대학원 교육의 교육투자수익률 비교 분석
    양민석 이현국 이호준 정지혜 교육재정경제연구, 23, 161-183 [2014]
  • 유지은, & 이호준. 학교 및 교사 자율성이 학업성취에 미치는 영향 분석
    정동욱 교육행정학연구, 33, 257-276 [2015]
  • 유지은 국가별 학교분리와 학업성취도 관계 분석
    교육행정학연구, 34(2), 23-43 [2016]
  • 알버트 허쉬만(Albert Hirschman)을 통해 본 공공성의 작동원리: 경쟁, 참여, 이익 개념의 재해석을 중심으로
    강명구 행정논총, 51(2), 1-29 [2013]
  • 신행정학의 공공성
    임의영 사회과학연구, 47(2), 135-166 [2008]
  • 신자유주의적 세계화 패러다임 : 비판적 검토와 대안적 전망
    유호근 아태연 구, 16(1), 123-140 [2009]
  • 시ㆍ도 교육청 수준에서의 교육재정 형평성 분석
    우명숙(Myung-Suk Woo) 교육행정학연구, 25(4), 263-284 [2007]
  • 시 도 교육청별 단위학교 간 교육자원 배분의 형평성 비교 분석: 전국 공립초등학교를 중심으로
    이호준 정동욱 지윤경 홍지영 교육행정학연구, 29(4), 275-295 [2011]
  • 서울특별시 교육경비보조금 배분기준 및 수혜학교 특성 분석
  • 새로운 교직과정을 위한 교육학개론
    강영삼 김진영 이성흠 조상철 서울: 교육과학사 [2007]
  • 새로운 교육사회학 총론
    이종각 서울: 동문사 [2004]
  • 박사
    불충분교육의 경제적 비용 분석
    이호준 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2013]
  • 미국 경제계층 격차에 따른 영 유아 교육격차 해소 방안
    김현준 교육정책 네트워크 기획기사 [2017]
  • 대학 재정지원 정책과 대학의 재정구조 분석. 서울대학교 대학원
    김훈호 박사학위논문 [2014]
  • 국가별 단위학교 간 교육자원 배분과 학업성취도 분석
  • 박사
    국가별 교육책무성 정책과 학업성취도 분석
    김영식 서울대학교 대학원 박 사학위논문 [2014]
  • 교육재정학
    반상진 서울: 학지사 [2014]
  • 교육소외의 격차 해소를 위한 교육복지정책의 과제
    김인희 한국사회정책, 17(1), 129-175 [2010]
  • 교육사회학(제4판)
    김신일 서울: 교육과학사 [2009]
  • 교육복지정책의 쟁점과 추진방향 연구. 한국인적자원연구센터
    정동욱 연구 과제 KHR- 2011-5 [2011]
  • 교육복지의 이해
    임연기 서울: 학지사 [2013]
  • 교육복지의 논의: 쟁점, 과제 및 전망
    박주호 서울: (주)박영Story [2014]
  • 교육복지의 개념에 관한 고찰
    김인희(Kim In Hee) 교육행정학연구, 24(3), 289-314 [2006]
  • 교육복지와 학교의 역할
    김정원 교육사회학연구, 17(4), 35-61 [2007]
  • 교육복지론
    김성기 유기웅 윤철수 장덕호 서울: 박영 STORY [2015]
  • 교육 공공성의 측면에서 본 독일의 교육정책
    박종배 임광국 조상식 교육 의 이론과 실제, 19(2), 53-74 [2014]
  • 교육 공공성의 개념 체계와 정립 원리
    성병창 ( Byung Chang Sung ) 초등교육연구, 20(3), 229-249 [2007]
  • 공교육의 의미. 황원철, 김성열, 고창규 저
    나병현 공교육: 이념･제도･개혁, 7~28 [2004]
  • 공교육의 역사성. 황원철, 김성열, 고창규(편저)
    이윤미 공교육 이념･제도･ 개혁. 124-141 [2004]
  • 공공성의 인간적 토대와 행정
    임의영 사회과학연구, 54(2), 217-248 [2015]
  • 공공성의 유형화.
    임의영 한국행정학보, 44(2), 1-21 [2010]
  • 공공성의 개념적 접근. 윤수재, 이민호, 채종헌 편, 새로운 시대의 공공성 연구
    소영진 서울: 법문사, 32-63 [2008]
  • 공공성의 개념구조와 유형
    임의영 한국행정학회 학술발표논문집. 1215-1232 [2009]
  • 공공성의 개념, 위기, 활성화의 조건
    임의영 정부학연구, 9(1), 23-50 [2003]
  • 공공성: 개념, 역사, 쟁점
    고세훈 황해문화, 9, 8-27 [2014]
  • 공공성
    고세훈(高世薰) 서울: 책세상 [2014]
  • 공공부문의 경제학
    소병희 서울: 박영사 [2004]
  • 공공경제학(제4판)
    나성린 전영섭 홍성훈 서울: 박영사 [2014]
  • 경제성장과 교육의 공정경쟁
    김세직 경제논집, 53(1), 3-20 [2014]
  • 『우리나라 교육재정의 공평성 분석』
    윤홍주 교육행정학연구, 22(2), 307-326 [2004]
  • 『공공성이란 무엇인가』
    조한상 서울: 책세상 [2009]
  • 「우리나라 복지정책의 변천과 과제」
    최병호 예산정책연구, 3(1), 89-129 [2014]
  • “신자유주의적 세계화의 원인과 대안”
    윤선구 사회와 철학, 5, 155-188 [2003]
  • “STATA 고급 패널데이터 분석”
    민익식 최필선 서울: 지필미디어 [2012]
  • “'빈곤 벗어나기' 힘든 사회…빈곤탈출률 8년새 최저”
    연합뉴스 , 1, 27) [2015]
  • Zimmer, R., & Bettinger, E. P. (2010). The efficacy of educational vouchers. In Brewer, D. J., & McEwan, P. J. (Eds.). (2010). Economics of education. Elsevier.
  • Yang, J., Huang, X., & Liu, X. (2014). An analysis of education inequality in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 37, 2-10.
  • Woo, S., Lee, S., & Kim, K. (2015). Carrot and stick?: Impact of a low-stakes school accountability program on student achievement. Economics Letters, 137, 195-199.
  • Woessmann, L., E. Luedemann, G. Schuetz, and Martin R. West (2009), School accountability, autonomy, and choice around the world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Woessmann, L. (2016). The importance of school systems: Evidence from international differences in student achievement. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 3-31.
  • Woessmann, L. (2008). Efficiency and equity of European education and training policies. International Tax and Public Finance, 15(2), 199-230.
  • Woessmann, L. (2005), The Effect Heterogeneity of Central Exams: Evidence from TIMSS, TIMSS-Repeat and PISA, Education Economics, 13 (2), 143-169.
  • Woessmann, L. (2003), Schooling Resources, Educational Institutions and Student Peformance: the International Evidence, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65 (2), 117-170.
  • Woessmann, L. (2001), Why Students in Some Countries Do Better: International Evidence on the Importance of Education Policy, Education Matters, 1 (2), 67-74.
  • Witte, J. F. (1992). Private school versus public school achievement: Are there findings that should affect the educational choice debate? Economics of Education Review, 11(4), 371-394.
  • Wang, M. T., &Sheikh‐Khalil, S. (2014). Does parental involvement matter for student achievement and mental health in high school?. Child Development , 85 (2), 610-625.
  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Mijs, J. J. (2010). Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: A comparative perspective. Annual review of sociology, 36, 407-428.
  • Uusitalo, R. (1999). Return to education in Finland. Labour Economics, 6(4), 569-580.
  • UNESCO (2016). Education 2030. Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4.
  • UNESCO (2000). The Dakar Framework for Action: Education for all: Meeting our Collective Commitments. Paris: UNESCO.
  • UNESCO (1990). World Declaration on Education for All and Framework for Action for to Meet Basic Learning Needs. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Timmons, J. F. (2010). Does democracy reduce economic inequality?. British Journal of Political Science, 40(04), 741-757.
  • The White House (2015. 1. 20). Remarks by the President in State of the Union Address. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/01/20/remarkspresident-state-union-address-january-20-2015
  • Stromquist, N.(2002). Education in Globalized World: The Connectivity of Economic Power, Technology and Knowlege. New York: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, INC.
  • Stright, A. D., & Yeo, K. L. (2014). Maternal parenting styles, school involvement, and children’s school achievement and conduct in Singapore. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 301.
  • Shujaa, M. J. (1993). Education and schooling: You can have one without the other. Urban Education, 27(4), 328-351.
  • Sewell, W. H., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1969). The educational and early occupational attainment process. American sociological review, 82-92.
  • Sewell, W. H., Haller, A. O., & Ohlendorf, G. W. (1970). The educational and early occupational status attainment process: Replication and revision. American Sociological Review, 1014-1027.
  • Schuetz, M., R. West, L. Woessmann (2007). School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice and the Equity of Student Achievement: International Evidence from PISA 2003. OECD Education Working Paper No. 12, EDU/WKP(2007)7. Paris: OECD.
  • Schmidt, W. H., Burroughs, N. A., Zoido, P., & Houang, R. T. (2015). The Role of Schooling in Perpetuating Educational Inequality An International Perspective. Educational Researcher, 44(7), 371-386.
  • Sch tz, G., Ursprung, H. W., & W mann, L. (2008). Education policy and equality of opportunity. Kyklos, 61(2), 279-308.
  • Sandy, J., & Duncan, K. (2010). Examining the achievement test score gap between urban and suburban students. Education Economics, 18(3), 297-315.
  • STATA 패널데이터 분석
    민인식 최필선 서울: 한국STATA학회 출판부 [2010]
  • Rouse, C. E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. The Quarterly journal of economics, 113(2), 553-602.
  • Roemer, J. (1998). Equality of Opportunity, Cambridge, MA: Harvards University Press.
  • Rockoff, J., & Turner, L. J. (2010). Short-run impacts of accountability on school quality. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(4), 119-147.
  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 417-458.
  • Rees, D. I., Brewer, D. J., & Argys, L. M. (2000). How should we measure the effect of ability grouping on student performance? Economics of Education Review, 19(1), 17-20.
  • Reardon, S. F., Greenberg, E. H., Kalogrides, D., Shores, K. A., & Valentino, R. A. (2013). Left behind? The effect of No Child Left Behind on academic achievement gaps. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Reardon, S. F., & Robinson, J. P. (2008). Patterns and trends in racial/ethnic and socioeconomic academic achievement gaps. Handbook of research in education finance and policy, 497-516.
  • Ramos L. R., Duque, J. C., & Nieto, S. (2016). Decomposing the rural-urban differential in student achievement in Colombia using PISA microdata. Estudios de Econom a Aplicada, 2016, 34(2), 379-412.
  • Plug, E. J. S. (2001). Season of Birth, Schooling and Earnings. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(5), 641-660.
  • Pischke, J. S., & Von Wachter, T. (2008). Zero returns to compulsory schooling in Germany: Evidence and interpretation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3), 592-598.
  • Piopiunik, Marc; Hanushek, Eric A.; Wiederhold, Simon (2014) : The Impact of Teacher Skills on Student Performance across Countries, Beitr ge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins f r Socialpolitik 2014: Evidenzbasierte Wirtschaftspolitik - Session: Education I, No. A18-V3
  • Papay, J. P., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2015). Income-Based Inequality in Educational Outcomes Learning From State Longitudinal Data Systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1), 29S-52S.
  • O’Neill A. 신자유주의 교육정책, 계보와 그 너 머 (김용 역). 서울: 학이시습
    Codd, J. A. Olssen, M. (원서출판 2004) [2015]
  • Ou, D. (2013). Education for all: quasi-experimental estimates of the impacts of compulsory primary education in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(3), 267-283.
  • Oreopoulos, P. (2007). Do dropouts drop out too soon? Wealth, health and happiness from compulsory schooling. Journal of public Economics, 91(11), 2213-2229.
  • Okun, A M (1975), Equality and efficiency, the big tradeoff, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • OECD (2015). Education policy outlook 2015: making reforms happen. Paris, Francia: OECD.
  • OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Technical Report.
  • OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background – equity in learning opportunities and outcomes- (Volume II). OECD Publishing.
  • Nores, M. (2010). The economics of early childhood interventions, In Brewer, D. J., & McEwan, P. J. (Eds.). (2010). Economics of education. Elsevier.
  • Nieto, S., & Ramos, R. (2013). Decomposition of Differences in PISA Results in Middle Income Countries. Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2013/4.
  • Murnane, R. J. (1981). Teacher mobility revisited. Journal of Human Resources, 16(1), 3-19.
  • Montt, G. (2011). Cross-national differences in educational achievement inequality. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 49-68.
  • Miller, P., Mulvey, C., & Martin, N. (2006). The return to schooling: Estimates from a sample of young Australian twins. Labour Economics, 13(5), 571-587.
  • Meghir, C., & Palme, M. (2005). Educational reform, ability, and family background. The American Economic Review, 95(1), 414-424.
  • McMahon, W. W. (2010). The external benefits of education. In Brewer, D. J., & McEwan, P. J. (Eds.). Economics of education. Elsevier.
  • Mayer, D. P., Peterson, P. E., Myers, D. E., Tuttle, C. C., & Howell, W. G. (2002). School Choice in New York City after Three Years: An Evaluation of the School Choice Scholarships Program. Final Report.
  • MacLeod, W. B., & Urquiola, M. (2015). Reputation and school competition. The American Economic Review, 105(11), 3471-3488.
  • Loeb, S., & Myung, J. (2010). Economic Approaches to Teacher Recruitment and Retention. In Brewer, D. J., & McEwan, P. J. (Eds.). Economics of education. Elsevier.
  • Lefgren, L. (2004). Educational peer effects and the Chicago public schools. Journal of urban Economics, 56(2), 169-191.
  • Lankford, H., Loeb S., & Wyckoff, J. (2010). Teacher Labor Makrets: An Overview. In Brewer, D. J., & McEwan, P. J. (Eds.). Economics of education. Elsevier.
  • Lankford, H., Loeb S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the Plight of Urban Schools: A Descriptive Analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62.
  • Kuziemko, I. (2006). Using shocks to school enrollment to estimate the effect of school size on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 25(1), 63-75.
  • Krueger, A. B., & Zhu, P. (2004). Another look at the New York City school voucher experiment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(5), 658-698.
  • Krieg, J. M. (2006). Teacher quality and attrition. Economics of Education review, 25(1), 13-27.
  • Kim, T. H., Lee, S. M., Yu, K., Lee, S., & Puig, A. (2005). Hope and the meaning of life as influences on Korean adolescents’ resilience: Implications for counselors. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(2), 143-152.
  • Karl Polanyi의 내포(embeddedness)개념과 공공성
    임의영 한국행정연구, 3, 1-30 [2014]
  • Kane, T. J. & Rouse, C. E. (1995). Labor-Market Returns to Two- and Four-Year College. The American Economic Review, 85(3), 600-614.
  • Kalogrides, D., Loeb, S., & Beteille, T. (2013). Systematic sorting: Teacher characteristics and class assignments. Sociology of Education, 86, 103-123.
  • Jennings, J. L., Deming, D., Jencks, C., Lopuch, M., & Schueler, B. E. (2015). Do differences in school quality matter more than we thought? New evidence on educational opportunity in the twenty-first century. Sociology of Education, 88(1), 56-82.
  • Jacob, B. A. (2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of public Economics, 89(5), 761-796.
  • Jacob, B. A. & Levitt, S. D. (2003) Rotten Apples: An Investigation Of The Prevalence And Predictors Of Teacher Cheating. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 843-878.
  • Jackson, C. K. (2009). Student demographics, teacher sorting, and teacher quality: Evidence from the end of school desegregation. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(2), 213-256.
  • Imberman, S. A., Kugler, A. D., & Sacerdote, B. I. (2012). Katrina's children: Evidence on the structure of peer effects from hurricane evacuees. The American Economic Review, 102(5), 2048-2082.
  • Hoxby, C. M. (2000). The effect of class size on student achievement: New evidence from population variation. Quarterly Journal of Economic Literature, 115(3), 1239-1285.
  • Hoxby, C. M. (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation (No. w7867). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Hoxby, C. M. (1996). Are efficiency and equity in school finance substitutes or complements?. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 51-72.
  • Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The effect of primary-school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high-and low-income countries. American Journal of sociology, 88(6), 1162-1194.
  • Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1982). Influences on academic achievement across high and low income countries: A re-analysis of IEA data. Sociology of Education, 13-21.
  • Heyneman, S. P. (2015). The Heyneman/Loxley Effect: 30 Years of Debate. Presentation to the Conference on the Future Education Design: Theory, Practice and Policy Seoul National University.
  • Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). An exchange: Part I*: Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational researcher, 23(3), 5-14.
  • Harris, D. N., & Herrington, C. D. (2006). Accountability, standards, and the growing achievement gap: Lessons from the past half-century. American Journal of Education, 112(2), 209-238.
  • Harris, D. N. (2010). Education Production Functions: Concepts. In Brewer, D. J., & McEwan, P. J. (Eds.). (2010). Economics of education. Elsevier.
  • Harding, R., & Stasavage, D. (2014). What Democracy Does (and Doesn’t Do) for Basic Services: School Fees, School Inputs, and African Elections. The Journal of Politics, 76, 229-245.
  • Hanushek, Eric A. & Link, Susanne & Woessmann, Ludger, (2013). Does school autonomy make sense everywhere? Panel estimates from PISA, Journal of Development Economics, 104, 212-232
  • Hanushek, E. A., Peterson, P. E., & Woessmann, L. (2011). Teaching math to the talented. Education Next, 11(1).
  • Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Markman, J. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of applied econometrics, 18(5), 527-544.
  • Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of human resources, 39(2), 326-354.
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297-327.
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Luque, J. A. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics of Education Review, 22(5), 481-502.
  • Hanushek, E. A.(1997). Effects of School Resource on Economic Performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141-164.
  • Hanushek, E. A. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences‐in‐differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116(510).
  • Guttal, S. (2002). Women and Globalization-Some Key Issues. Presentation a the Conference on Strategies of the The Women's Movement of the 21st Century, Bangkok, Markch 28-29.
  • Grenet, J. (2013). Is extending compulsory schooling alone enough to raise earnings? Evidence from French and British compulsory schooling laws. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(1), 176-210.
  • Goldhaber, D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293-307.
  • Goldhaber, D. (2011). Licensure: Exploring the value of this gateway to the teacher workforce. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 3, 315-39.
  • Glewwe, P., Jacoby, H. G., & King, E. M. (2001). Early childhood nutrition and academic achievement: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of public economics, 81(3), 345-368.
  • Gallego, F. A. (2010). Historical origins of schooling: The role of democracy and political decentralization. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), 228-243.
  • Galiani, S., P. Gertler, and E. Schargrodsky (2008), 'School decentralization: Helping the good get better, but leaving the poor behind', Journal of Public Economics, 92 (10-11), 2106-2120.
  • Fuchs, T. and L. Woessmann (2007), 'What Accounts for International Differences in Student Performance? A Re-examination using PISA data', Empirical Economics, 32 (2-3), 433-464.
  • Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 3(8), 383-417.
  • Figlio, D., & Ladd, H. (2010). The economics of school accountability. Economics of education, 351-356.
  • Figlio, D. N., & Rouse, C. E. (2006). Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools? Journal of Public Economics, 90(1), 239-255.
  • Egalite, A. J., & Kisida, B. (2016). School size and student achievement: a longitudinal analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(3), 406-417.
  • Editorial Projects in Education Research Center. (2011, July 7). Issues A-Z: Achievement Gap. Education Week. Retrieved October 26, 2017 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/achievement-gap/
  • Dupre, L. (1993). The Common Good and the Open Society. The Review of Politics, 55(4), 687-712.
  • Duncan, G. J., & Sojourner, A. J. (2013). Can intensive early childhood intervention programs eliminate income-based cognitive and achievement gaps? Journal of Human Resources, 48(4), 945-968.
  • Downey, D. B., Von Hippel, P. T., & Broh, B. A. (2004). Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69(5), 613-635.
  • Donaldson, M. L., & Johnson, S. M. (2010). The Price of Misassignment The Role of Teaching Assignments in Teach For America Teachers’ Exit From Low-Income Schools and the Teaching Profession. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(2), 299-323.
  • Dee, T., & Jacob, B. (2011). The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 418-446.
  • Dee, T. S., & West, M. R. (2011). The non-cognitive returns to class size. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(1), 23-46.
  • Dee, T. S. (2005). A teacher like me: Does race, ethnicity, or gender matter? American Economic Review, 158-165.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.
  • Dahlum, S., & Knutsen, C. H. (2017). Do Democracies Provide Better Education? Revisiting the Democracy–Human Capital Link. World Development, 94, 186-199.
  • Cremin, L. A. (1957). The Republic and the School: Horace Mann on the Education of Free Man. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Cho, H., Glewwe, P., & Whitler, M. (2012). Do reductions in class size raise students’ test scores? Evidence from population variation in Minnesota's elementary schools. Economics of Education Review, 31(3), 77-95.
  • Chmielewski, A. K., & Reardon, S. F. (2016). Patterns of Cross-National Variation in the Association Between Income and Academic Achievement. AERA Open, 2(3), 1-27.
  • Chmielewski, A. K. (2014). An international comparison of achievement inequality in within-and between-school tracking systems. American Journal of Education, 120(3), 293-324.
  • Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2005). Effects of resources, inequality, and privilege bias on achievement: Country, school, and student level analyses. American Educational Research J ournal, 42(4), 575-603.
  • Chingos, M. M. (2012). The impact of a universal class-size reduction policy: Evidence from Florida's statewide mandate. Economics of Education Review, 31(5), 543-562.
  • Castell -Climent, A. (2008). On the distribution of education and democracy. Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 179-190.
  • Carson, A. S., & Wilson, J. (1984). Education and schooling. International Review of Education, 30(1), 41-55.
  • Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002), Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305-331.
  • Carneiro, P., Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2010). Estimating marginal returns to education. NBER working paper 16474.
  • Cabus, S. J., & De Witte, K. (2011). Does school time matter?—On the impact of compulsory education age on school dropout. Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1384-1398.
  • Brunello, G., & Checchi, D. (2007). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic policy, 22(52), 782-861.
  • Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Ronfeldt, M., & Wyckoff, J. (2011). The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications to transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools. Journal of policy analysis and management, 30(1), 88-110.
  • Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers' preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113-132.
  • Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement (No. w14022). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Booker, K., Gilpatric, S. M., Gronberg, T., & Jansen, D. (2008). The effect of charter schools on traditional public school students in Texas: Are children who stay behind left behind?. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(1), 123-145.
  • Bonica, A., McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2013). Why hasn't democracy slowed rising inequality?. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 103-123.
  • Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
  • Blau, P., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley&Sons.
  • Blanden, J., & Machin, S. (2010). Education and Inequality, In Brewer, D. J., & McEwan, P. J. (Eds.). Economics of education. Elsevier. 99-108.
  • Bifulco, R., & Ladd, H. F. (2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test‐score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina's charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(1), 31-56.
  • Betts, J. R., & Shkolnik, J. L. (2000). The effects of ability grouping on student achievement and resource allocation in secondary schools. Economics of Education Review, 19(1), 1-15.
  • Bettinger, E. P. (2005). The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools. Economics of Education Review, 24(2), 133-147.
  • Berne, R., & Stiefel, L. (1984). The Measurement of Equity in School Finance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
  • Bernardi, F. (2014). Compensatory advantage as a mechanism of educational inequality: A regression discontinuity based on month of birth. Sociology of Education, 87(2), 74-88.
  • Benabou, R. (1996). Equity and efficiency in human capital investment: the local connection. The Review of Economic Studies, 63(2), 237-264.
  • Belfield, C., & Levin, H. M. (2010). Educational privatization. In Brewer, D. J., & McEwan, P. J. (Eds.). (2010). Economics of education. Elsevier.
  • Becker, G. S. (1994). Human capital revisited. In Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (3rd Edition) (pp. 15-28). The University of Chicago Press.
  • Bardhan, P. (2006). Globalization and Egalitatarian Redistribution. New York: Rusell Sage Foundation.
  • Ballantine, J. (2001). The sociology of education: A systematic analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & LeTendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the “Heyneman-Loxley effect” on mathematics and science achievement. Comparative education review, 46(3), 291-312.
  • Baker, B., & Green, P. (2008). Conceptions of equity and adequacy in school finance. Handbook of research in education finance and policy, 203-221.
  • Autor, D. H. (2003). The economics of discrimination theory. Lecture Note of Labor Economics, MIT, 14.
  • Ashenfelter, O. & Rouse, C. (1998). Income, schooling, and ability: Evidence from a new sample of identical twins. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 253-284.
  • Arteaga, I., & Glewwe, P. (2017). Do community factors matter? An analysis of the achievement gap between indigenous and non-indigenous children in Peru. International Journal of Educational Development. forthcoming.
  • Argys, L. M., Rees, D. I., & Brewer, D. J. (1996). Detracking America's Schools: Equity at zero cost?. Journal of Policy analysis and Management, 623-645.
  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  • Apple, M. (2006). Education the "Right" Way(2nd ed.) New York: Routledge.
  • Angrist, J. D., & Lang, K. (2004). Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco Program. The American Economic Review, 94(5), 1613-1634.
  • Andersen, T M, and J Maibom (2016), The big trade-off between efficiency and equity - is it there?, CEPR Discussion Paper 11189
  • Amini, C., & Nivorozhkin, E. (2015). The urban–rural divide in educational outcomes: Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Educational Development, 44, 118-133.
  • Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2001). Schools, achievement, and inequality: A seasonal perspective. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 23(2), 171-191.
  • 21세기 교육과 민주주의 (심성보, 옮김). 서울: 살림터
    Noddings, N. (원문출 판 2013) [2016]