연구동향 분석
박사

효과적인 피의자 신문 기법 탐색을 위한 연구 : PEACE-model과 Reid technique의 효과성 검토 및 검증을 중심으로

홍유진 2018년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 효과적인 피의자 신문 기법 탐색을 위한 연구 : PEACE-model과 Reid technique의 효과성 검토 및 검증을 중심으로' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • PEACE-model
  • reidtechnique
  • 수사면담
  • 자백 획득형 방식
  • 정보 수집형 방식
  • 진술분석
  • 피의자신문기법
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
43 0

0.0%

' 효과적인 피의자 신문 기법 탐색을 위한 연구 : PEACE-model과 Reid technique의 효과성 검토 및 검증을 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • 박사
    형사피의자의 거짓반응행태에 관한 연구
    김원석 광주대학교 대학원 박사학 위논문 [2013]
  • 박사
    형사절차상 진술증거에 대한 연구: 개정 형사소송법의 쟁점을 중심 으로
    안성수 인하대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2008]
  • 현대 심리신문기법이 허위자백을 유발시킨다는 견해들의 논증구조의 분석과 타당성 평가
    조광훈 법학연구, 26(2), 265-304 [2015]
  • 현대 심리신문기법과 허위자백: 현대 심리신문기법에 의한 허위자백 유발에 대한 원인분석과 형사소송법상 대응책의 검토를 중심으로
    권영법 형사정책연 구, 23(3), 91-127 [2012]
  • 허위자백의 사례분석을 통해 본 형사절차상 문제점
    이기수 비교형사법연구, 14(1), 165-192 [2012]
  • 한국 경찰의 수사면담 교육 변화과정과 개선을 위한 제언
    이윤 경찰법연구, 10(1), 205-229 [2012]
  • 피의자진술의 왜곡 방지를 위한 신문기법에 관한 연구
    김충식 한남대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2013]
  • 피의자신문기법에 관한 연구
    김양일 호서대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2009]
  • 피의자신문과정에서 실체적 진실의 왜곡가능성 : 수사기관의 질문유형과 신문기법에 대한 분석을 중심으로
    김동률 이훈 한국공안행정학회보, 65, 61-82 [2016]
  • 피의자 신문조서의 증거능력
    김재한 목포대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2006]
  • 피의자 신문조서 왜곡의 형성과 영향: 조서의 작성, 정정 및 평가 단계에 관한 실험연구
    이형근 한림대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2015]
  • 피의자 신문기법의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구: Reid Techinque과 PEACE 모델 비교・검토를 중심으로
    김지환 이기수 한국 경찰연구학회. 한국경찰연구, 11(4) [2012]
  • 피의자 신문기법 관한 연구: 자백을 이끌어내기 위한 기법을 중심 으로
    최광식 동아대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2002]
  • 박사
    피의자 신문기법 개선방안 연구
    박갑렬 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2005]
  • 피의자 신문 시 인권보호에 관한 연구: 법제도 및 신문기법상 인권 보장을 중심으로
    이점신 한양대학교 공공정책대학원 석사학위논문 [2013]
  • 피의자 신문 기법의 문제점 및 개선 방안: 심리학적 관점을 중심으로
    김민지 한국경찰연구, 12(1), 31-62 [2013]
  • 진술분석 최근 해외활용 현황 및 국내 발전 방안에 관한 연구
    박광배 대검찰 청 연구용역과제 [2014]
  • 진술분석 절차에 관한 연구
    김미영 경기대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2016]
  • 조사역량의 객관적 평가를 위한 기술 및 태도 연구
    전우병 법무연수원 용역 연구과제 [2012]
  • 일화기억 회상 시 질문의 순서 바꾸기가 정보인출에 미치는 영향
    김시업(Si Up Kim) 홍유진(Eujin Hong) 한국심리학회: 사회 및 성격, 30(2), 43-61 [2016]
  • 영미법계 수사기관의 신문기법과 자백의 증거능력
    허인석 형사법의 신동향, 19, 195-282 [2009]
  • 아동 대상 성범죄의 전문가 참여제도에 관한 고찰
    김시업 홍유진 법학연구, 25(4), 285-320 [2017]
  • 신형사소송법
    이 보영 박영사 [2008]
  • 수사절차상의 인권보장에 관한 헌법문제
    신주호 중학대학교 대학원 박사학 위논문 [2010]
  • 수사심리학
    김종률 학지사 [2002]
  • 수사면담 시 라포가 진술의 양에 미치는 영향
    김기민 김시업 문옥영 한국심 리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(1), 149-166 [2010]
  • 수사론
    박노섭 서울: 경찰공제회 [2010]
  • 수사기관의 피의자 신문기법에 대한 문제점 및 개선방안 연구
    손지호 경기 대학교 행정대학원 석사학위논문 [2013]
  • 수사관의 용의자 면담유형과 수사관 개인차 변인의 관계
    이윤(Yi Roon) 경찰학연구, 16(3), 141-178 [2016]
  • 수사관의 용의자 면담유형 분류 및 수사면담유형 평가척도의 개발
    이윤 한림대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2015]
  • 불안감 수준과 성별이 목격자 진술에 미치는 영향 : 진술의 양과 정확성을 중심으로
    김시업 홍유진 교정담론, 11(1), 147-184 [2017]
  • 복합 시행 프로토콜(complex trial protocol)에서 문장을 이용한 P300-기반 유죄지식검사
    박은혜 경기대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2015]
  • 법제처(http://www
    moleg.go.kr)
  • 법률용어사전
    현암사 현암사 [2004]
  • 범죄수사 절차상 피의자의 인권침해 현황 조사
    강은영 신의기 국가인권위원 회 2002년도 인권상황 실태조사 연구용역 사업보고서 [2003]
  • 박사
    무죄판결과 법관의 사실인정에 관한 연구: 항소심의 파기자판 사례 들을 중심으로
    김상준 서울대학교 법학전문대학원 박사학위논문 [2013]
  • 맥락회복기법이 진술의 진실성 판단에 미치는 영향: 현실모니터링을 중심으로
    김미영 김시업 전우병 한국과학수사학회지. 10(3), 211-218 [2016]
  • 리드(Reid) 신문기법상 행동분석의 수사실무 적용사례 분석: 2007년 시행 한 2건의 살인사건 용의자 신문을 중심으로
    이윤 경찰법연구, 5(2), 31-58 [2007]
  • 리드 기법(Reid Technique)의 활용 가능성에 관한 연구
    박용철 경찰학논총, 8(2), 94-116 [2013]
  • 대법원 종합법률정보 http://glaw
    scourt.go.kr)
  • 대법원 http://www
    scourt.go.kr)
  • 대검찰청(http://www
    spo.go.kr)
  • 대검찰청 조사 신문핵심원리 실무메뉴얼
    대검찰청 [2010]
  • 국립국어원 표준국어대사전 http://stdweb2
    korean.go.kr)
  • 공판중심주의 강화에 따른 경찰 수사환경 변화 및 대응방안 연구
    김근준 경희대학교 행정대학원 석사학위논문 [2008]
  • 검찰수사역량강화 방안: 검찰수사관의 수사연구 교육, 평가, 자격제 도 입을 중심으로
    김종률 법무연수원 [2008]
  • 박사
    『형사절차에 있어서 진술의 허위성 판단에 관한 연구』
    이재경 중앙대학교 대 학원 박사학위논문 [2011]
  • Zimbardo, P. (1971). Coercion and compliance: The psychology of police confessions. In C. Perruci and M. Pilisuk. (Ed.), The Triple Revolution (pp. 492–508). Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Witt, J. W. (1973). Non-coercive interrogation and the administration of criminal justice: The impact of Miranda on police effectuality. The Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law, 64, 320–332.
  • Williamson, T. M. (1993). From Interrogation to Investigative interviewing; Strategic Trends in Police Questioning. Journal of Community & Applied Psychology, 3, 89-99.
  • Williamson, T. M. (1990). Strategic Changes in police interrogation: An examination of police and suspect behaviour in the metropolitan police in order to determine the effects of new legislation, Technology and Organisational Policies. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of Kent.
  • Walsh, D. W., & Milne, R. (2008). Keeping the PEACE? A study of investigative interviewing practices in the public sector. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(1), 39–57.
  • Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499–518.
  • Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Leal, S., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32(3), 253–265.
  • Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Vernham, Z, & Brankaert, F. (2015). Translating Theory into practice: Evaluating a cognitive lie detection training workshop. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(2), 110-120.
  • Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Hillman, J., & Sperry, K. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 159–166.
  • Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Outsmarting the liars: Towards acognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 28–32.
  • Vrij, A., & Mann, S. A., & Fisher, P. R. (2006). Information-gathering vs. accusatory interviewing style: individual differences in respondent’s experiences. Personality and individual differences, 42, 589-599.
  • Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). Eliciting information and detecting lies in intelligence interviewing: An overview of recent research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 936
  • Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. [Invited target article]. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 2, 110-117.
  • Vrij, A., & Ganis, G. (2014). Theories in deception and lie detection. In D. C. Raskin,C. R. Honts, & J. C. Kircher (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research andapplications. Academic Press.
  • Vrij, A. (2015). A cognitive approach to lie detection. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, &B. Verchuere (Eds.), Deception detection: Current challenges and new approaches. Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3–41.
  • Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and its implications for professional practice. Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Visu-Petra, G., Varga, M., Miclea, M., & Visu-Petra, L. (2013). When interferencehelps: Increasing executive load to facilitate deception detection in the con-cealed information test. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 146.
  • Vernham, Z., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Hillman, J. (2014). Collective interviewing: Eliciting cues to deceit using a turn-taking approach. Psychology, Public Policyand Law, 20, 309–324.
  • Undeutsch, U. (1984). Courtroom evaluation of eyewitness testimony. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 51–67.
  • Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 27 –56). Deventer, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Thomas III, G. C., & Leo, R. A. (2002). The effects of Miranda v. Arizona: “Embedded” in our national culture? Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 29, 203–271.
  • The Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives (2014). Federal Rules of Evidence, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington.
  • Stevens, A. F., (1998). An Evaluation of the Process of Developing Interview Skills for uniform Constables within Humberside Police. Unpublished M. Ed Dissertation, University of Hull.
  • Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Mitchell, S. (2001). Use of astructured investigative protocol enhances young children’s responses to free-recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 997–1005.
  • Stephenson, G. M., & Moston, S. (1994). Police interrogation. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1, 151–157.
  • Steller, M., & Kohnken, G. (1989). Criteria based statement analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evid ence (pp. 217–245), New York: Springer.
  • Sporer, S. L., Kuepper, B., & Bursch, S. E. (1995). Hilft Wissen ueber Realitaetsueberwachung, um zwischen wahren und erfundenen Geschichten zu unterscheiden? : Does knowledge about reality monitoring help to discriminate between true and invented stories?, Paper presented at the 37th Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen in Bochum.
  • Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373–397.
  • Sporer, S. L. & Schwandt, B. (2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 13, 1-34.
  • Sooniste, T., Granhag, P. A., Str mwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2016). Discriminating between true and false intent among small cells of suspects. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21, 344–357.
  • Sooniste, T., Granhag, P. A., Knieps, M., & Vrij, A. (2013). True and false intentions: Asking about the past to detect lies about the future. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 673–685.
  • Softley. P. (1980). Police Interrogation: An observational study in four police stations. Home Office Research Study No. 61. London: HMSO. Cited in Phillips, C., & Brown, D. (1998). Entry into the criminal justice system: a survey of police arrests and their outcomes. London: HMSO. Home Office Research Study No. 185.
  • Snook, B., Luther, K., Quinlan, H., & Milne, R. (2012). Let Me Talk! A field studyof police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons. Criminal Justiceand Behavior, 39, 1328–1339.
  • Snook, B., Eastwood, J., Stinson, M., Tedeschini, J., & House, J. C. (2010). Reforming investigative interviewing in Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 52, 203–218.
  • Snook, B., & Keating, K. (2011). A field study of adult witness interviewing practices in a Canadian police organization. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 160–172.
  • Smith, R. M., Powell, R. M., & Lum, J. (2009). The relationship between jobstatus, interviewing experience, gender and police officers’ adherence to open-ended questions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 51–63.
  • Skerker, M. (2010). An ethics of interrogation. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.
  • Shepherd, E. (2007). Investigative interviewing: The Conversation Management Approach. Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
  • Shawyer, A., Milne, B., & Bull, R. (2009). Investigative interviewing in the UK. In T. Williamson, B. Milne, & R. Bull (Eds.), International developments in investigative interviewing(pp. 24–38), Devon, England: Willan.
  • Ruby, C. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1997). The usefulness of the Criteria-Based Content Analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 705–737.
  • Rigg, K. (1999). An assessment of the positive as compared to the normative in the use of best practice, as defined by the PEACE model of investigative interview, in the investigation and interviewing of suspects by officers who have been trainde in the use of the PEACE model by Northumbria Police. Unpublished MSc dissertation, University of Portsmouth.
  • Redlich, A. D. (2007). Military versus police interrogations: Similarities and differences. Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13, 423-428.
  • Powell, M. B., Fisher, R. P., & Wright, R. (2005). Investigative interviewing. In N.Brewer, & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective(pp. 11–42), New York: Guilford Press.
  • Phillips, C., & Brown, D., James, Z., & Goodrich, P. (1998). Entry into the criminal justice system: a survey of police arrests and their outcomes. London: HMSO. Home Office Research Study No. 185.
  • Pearse, J., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1999). Measuring influential police interviewing tactics: A factor analytic approach. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 221–238.
  • Pearse, J., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996). Police interviewing techniques at two south london police stations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 3(1), 63–74.
  • Parker, A. D., & Brown, J. (2000). Detection of deception: Statement Validity Analysis as a means of determining truthfulness or falsity of rape allegations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, 237–259.
  • Paisley, E. (1998). An investigation into the effectiveness of the Bedfordshire Police investigative interview tape monitoring procedure. Unpublished MA dissertation, De Montford University, Bedford.
  • Oxburgh, G., Ost, J., & Cherryman, J. (2012). Police interviews with suspected childsex offenders: Does use of empathy and question type influence the amountof investigation relevant information obtained? Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 259–273.
  • Ogden, G. (1994). An evaluation of the quality, supervision and preparation of records of interview. Unpublished report, Wiltshire Constabulary. Cited in
  • Ofshe, R. J., & Leo, R. A. (1997). The decision to confess falsely: Rational choice and irrational action. Denver University Law Review, 74, 979–1122.
  • Oberlander, L. B., & Goldstein, N. E. (2001). A review and update on the practice of evaluating Miranda comprehension. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 453–471.
  • Neubauer, D. (1974). Confessions in Prairie City: Some Causes and Effects. Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law, 65, 103–112.
  • National Crime Faculty, (2000). A practical guide to investigative interviewing (3th ed): Bramshill: National Crime Faculty and National Police Training, England.
  • Moston, S. J., & Engelberg, T. (1993). Police questioning techniques in tape recorded interviews with criminal suspects. Policing and Society, 6, 61-75.
  • Morgan, D., & Stephenson, G. (1994). Suspicion and Silence: the right to silence in criminal investigations. Blackstone Press: London.
  • Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Mertens, R., Allen, J. J. B. (2008). The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessment: Deception detection, ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios. Psychophysiology, 45(2), 286-298.
  • Memon, A., Meissner, C., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(4), 340-372.
  • Meissner, C. A., Russano, M. B., & Narchet, F. M. (2010). The importance of a laboratory science for improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence. In G. D. Lassiter & C. Meissner’s (Eds.) Interrogations and confessions: Research, practice, and policy. Washington, DC: APA.
  • Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions. Campbell Systematic Review, 8(13), 1-52.
  • Meissner, C. A., & Lassiter, G. D. (2010). Conclusion: What have we learned? Implications for practice, policy, and future research. In G. D. Lassiter & C.A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions(pp. 225– 229). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • McGurk, B. J., Carr, M. J., & McGurk, D. (1993). Investigative Interviewing Courses for Police Officers: An Evaluation. Police Research Series Paper, 4, London: Home Office.
  • Masip, J., Herrero, C., Garrido, E., & Barba, A. (2010). Is the Behaviour Analysis Interview just common sense? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 593-604.
  • Mac Giolla, E., Granhag, P. A., & Liu-J nsson, M. (2013). Markers of good planningbehaviour as a cue for separating true and false intent. PsyCh Journal, 2, 183–189.
  • Lucas, R., & McKenzie, I. (1999). The detection of dissimulation: Lies, damned lies and SVA. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 1, 347 –359.
  • Logue, M., Book, A., Frosina, P., Huizinga, T., & Amos, S. (2015). Using R eality Monitoring to Improve Deception Detection in the Context of the Cognitive Interview for Suspects. Law Human Behavior, 39(4), 360-367.
  • Lipton, J. P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 90–95.
  • Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Leo, R. A. (2001). Questioning the relevance of Miranda in the twenty-first century. University of Michigan Law Review, 99, 1000–1029.
  • Leo, R. A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 266–303.
  • Leo, R. A. (1992). From coercion to deception: The changing nature of police interrogation in America. Crime, Law, and Social Change: An International Journal, 18, 35–59.
  • Leins, D., Fisher, R., & Vrij, A. (2012). Drawing on liars’ lack of cognitive flexibility: Detecting deception through varying report modes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 601–607.
  • Lamers-Winkelman, F., & Buffing, F. (1996). Children’s testimony in the Netherlands: A study of Statement Validity Analysis. In B. L. Bottoms & G. S. Goodman (1996), International perspectives on child abuse and children’s testimony (pp. 45–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A., & Fon, D. A. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A Self– Report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law & Human Behavior, 31, 381-400.
  • Kassin, S. M., Goldstein, C. J., & Savitsky. K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: Compliance, internalisation, and confabulation. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 187-203.
  • Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law & Human Behavior, 34(1), 3-38.
  • Kassin, S. M. (2008). False confessions: Causes, consequences, and implications for reform. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17, 249–253.
  • Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228.
  • Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221-233.
  • Kassin, S. M. & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-67.
  • K hnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & H fer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adult's statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 671-684.
  • K hnken, G. (2004). Statement validity analysis and the ‘detection of the truth’. In P.A. Granhag, & L. A. Str mwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts, 41–63. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • K hnken, G. (2002). A German perspective on children’s testimony. In H. L. Westcott, G. M. Davies, & R. H. C. Bull (Eds.), Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice, 233–244. Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • K hnken, G. (1999). Statement Validity Assessment. Paper presented at the preconference program of applied courses assessing credibility organized by the European Association of Psychology and Law, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Justia US Supreme Court(http://supreme.justia.com)
  • Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G. and Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371-376.
  • Johnson, M. K. and Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
  • John E. Reid & Associates, INC.(http://www.reid.com)
  • Irving. B., & McKenzie, I. K. (1989). Police Interrogation: The Effects of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. London: Police Foundation.
  • Irving, B. (1980). Police Interrogation. A Case Study of Current Practice. Research Study No. 2. London: HMSO.
  • Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2004). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th ed.). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
  • Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
  • Horgan, A. J., Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., & Evans, J. (2010). Should I just confess? The perceived consequences of confessing and confession diagnosticity. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Home Office, (2017). Code C Revised. Code of Practice for the detention, treatment and questioning of persons by Police Officers, Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984(PACE).
  • Holsti, O. 1969, Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hill, C., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2008). The role of confirmation bias in suspect interviews: a systematic evaluation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 357-371.
  • Hershkowitz, I., Orbarch, Y., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J. & Horowitz, D. (2001). The Effects of Mental Context Reinstatement on Childre n’s Accounts of Sexual Abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 2 35-248.
  • Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Str mwall, L., & Vrij, A. (2005). Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 469-484.
  • Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Str mwall, L., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interrogations: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603–619.
  • Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Str mwall, L. A., Wolf, A., Vrij, A., & Roos af Hjelmsater, E. (2011). Detecting deception in suspects: Verbal cues as a function of interview strategy. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 17, 643-656.
  • Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Str mwall, L. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’strategies during interrogations. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 213 –227,
  • Hall, S. (1997). Investigative interviewing training – Milestone or millstone? Unpublished undergraduate dissertation, University of Portsmouth.
  • Gumpert, C. H., & Lindblad, F. (1999). Expert testimony on child sexual abuse: A qualitative study of the Swedish approach to statement analysis. Expert Evidence, 7, 279–314.
  • Gudjonsson, G. H., & Pearse, J. (2011). Suspect interview and false confessions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 33–37.
  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Griffith, A., & Milne, R. (2005). Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In T. Williamson (Ed), Investigative Interviewing: Rights, Research, Regulation, 167-189. Cullompton: Willan.
  • Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2015). The Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique: A conceptual overview. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verchuere (Eds.), Deception detection: Current challenges and new approaches. Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Granhag, P. A. (2010). The Strategic Use of Evidence(SUE) technique: A scientific perspective. High Value Detainee Interrogation Group(HIG; FBI). HIG Research Symposium: Interrogation in the European Union, Washington, DC.
  • Geiselman, R. E. (2012). The cognitive interview for suspects. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 30(3), 1–13.
  • GOV.UK(https://www.gov.uk)
  • Fulero, S. M., & Everington, C. (2004). Mental retardation, competency to waive Miranda rights and false confessions. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment (pp. 247–263). New York: Kluwer Academic.
  • Fisher, R. P., Falkner, K. L., Trevisan, M., & McCauley, M. R. (2000). Adaptingthe cognitive interview to enhance long-term (35 years) recall of physi-cal activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 180–189.
  • Fisher, R. P., Brennan, K. H., & McCauley, M. R. (2002). The cognitive interview method to enhance eyewitness recall. In M. L. Eisen, J. A. Quas, & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview, 265-286. Mayway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Fisher, R. P. & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
  • Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Michael, S. W., & Brandon, S. E. (2013). Validating anew assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a psychologically based credibility assessment tool. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 33–41.
  • Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: Cues to deceit in the marketplace, Politics and marriage. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891–1007.
  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118.
  • DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2004). Discerning lies from truths: Behavioural cuesto deception and the indirect pathway of intuition. In P. A. Granhag, & L. A. Str mwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts, 15–40. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Costanzo, M. & Redlich, A. (2010). Use of physical and psychological force in criminal and military interrogations. In J. Knuttsson & J. Kuhns (Eds.), Policing around the world: Police use of force. Praeger Security International.
  • Cole, T., Teboul, J. C., Zulawski, D., Wicklander, D., & Sturman, S. (2005). Trying to obtain false confessions through the use of false evidence: A replication of Kassin and Kiechel’s study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, NY. Retrieved
  • Clemens, F., Granhag, P. A., Str mwall, L. A., Vrij, A., Landstrom, S., Roos af Hjelmsater, E., & Hartwig, M. (2010). Skulking around the dinosaur: Eliciting cues to children’s deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 925-940.
  • Clemens, F., Granhag, P. A., & Str mwall, L. A. (2011). Eliciting cues to false intent: A new application of strategic interviewing. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 512–522.
  • Clarke, C. & Milne, R. (2001). National Evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course. Police Research Award Scheme (PRAS/149).
  • Christ, S. E., Van Essen, D. C., Watson, J. M., Brubaker, L. E., & McDermott, K. B. (2009). The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: Evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1557–1566.
  • Central Planning and Training Unit, (1993). Investigative interviewing: The Interviewings Rule Book. Harrrogate: Central Planning and Training Unit.
  • Central Planning and Training Unit, (1992). A Guide to Interviewing. Harrogate: Home Office.
  • Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Cassell, P. G., & Hayman, B. S. (1996). Police interrogation in the 1990s: An empirical study of the effects of Miranda. UCLA Law Review, 43, 839– 931.
  • Bull, R. & Soukara, S. (2010). What really happens in police interviews. In G.D. Lassiter & C.A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.
  • Bearchall, J. (1999). Investigative interviewing in the Metropolitan Police, 4 Area. Unpublished MSc. Thesis, University of Portsmouth.
  • Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1992). Deception detection and reality-monitoring: A new answer for an old question?, In F. Losel, D. Bender & T. Bliesener (Eds.): Psychology and Law: Advances in Research, Berlin: De Gruyter.