연구동향 분석
박사

영어 yeah, yes와 한국어 ‘예’의 담화기능과 운율의 상호작용 비교

임선희 2018년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 영어 yeah, yes와 한국어 ‘예’의 담화기능과 운율의 상호작용 비교' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 담화 기능
  • 벅아이코퍼스
  • 서울 코퍼스
  • 운율
  • 음향학
  • 태도
  • 화용적 의미
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,618 0

0.0%

' 영어 yeah, yes와 한국어 ‘예’의 담화기능과 운율의 상호작용 비교' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국어 학술 텍스트의 필자 태도 표현 교육 연구
    이슬비 서울 대학교 국어 교육과 박사학위논문 [2016]
  • 음운론
    전상범 서울, 서울대학교출판부 [2004]
  • 운평어문연구소, 『국어대사전』, 서울
    금성출판사 [1997]
  • 영어화용론
    김경애 현대 영어학 총서, 제7권, 서울, EnG [2012]
  • 담화분석
    김해연 현대 영어학 총서, 제9권, 서울, En G [2016]
  • 국어운율론
    이호영 서울, 韓國研究院 [1997]
  • 「한국 대학생 영어 학습자 코퍼스에 나타난 견지 부사구 (Stance Adverbials)의 사용」
    이은주 Foreign languages education (외국어교육), 제17권 제3호, 347-366쪽 [2010]
  • 「필자의 표현 태도 연구」
    김정자 서울대학교 국어교육과 박사학위 논문 [2001]
  • 「의지감탄사 ‘예, 글쎄, 아니’의 담화분석」
    사전편찬학 연구, 제5권 제6호, 연세대학교 언어정보개발원, 164-218쪽 [1993]
  • 「영어와 한국어억양 대조분석」
    구희산 영어교육, 제38호, 한국영어 교육학회, 47-63쪽 [1989]
  • 「언어 행위와 듣는 이의 신호에 관한 화용적 분석 시도: 담화 속에서 “네”」
    김하수 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 제14권 제1호, 연세대학교 언어연구 교육원, 55-70쪽 [1989]
  • 「사상 체질별 음성과 건강 수준 관련 가능성에 대한 고찰」
    유현희 이시우 조태형 동의생리병리학회지, 제26권 제2호, 한의병리 학회, 221-227쪽 [2012]
  • 「담화표지 {좀} 의 기능과 형태 운율적 특성의 실현 양상」
    송인성 신지영 한국어학, 제62권, 한국어학회, 315-339쪽 [2014]
  • 「국어 문법 교육의 태도 교육 내용 연구」
    김은성 서울대학교 국어 교육과 박사학위논문 [2006]
  • 「국어 담화 표지 ‘예’와 ‘네’의 사용에 나타나는 변이에 대한 연구」
    강현석 사회언어학, 제17권 제2호, 한국사회언어학회, 57-86쪽 [2009]
  • “할리데이 언어 이론의 국어교육학적 의미”
    주세형 국어교육, 제130 호, 한국어교육학회, 173-204쪽 [2009]
  • “한국어의 서법과 양태 체계”
    임동훈 한국어 의미학, 제26권, 한국어 의미학회, 211-249쪽 [2008]
  • “한국어 단음절어의 억양연구”
    이현복 언어학, 제1권, 한국언어학회, 131- 143쪽 [1976]
  • stman, Jan-Ola (1982), The Symbiotic Relationship between Pragmatic Particles and Impromptu Speech, In Enkvist, Nils Erik (Ed.), Impromptu Speech: A Symposium (pp. 147-177), Finland, Abo Akademi.
  • stman, Jan-Ola (1981), 'You Know': A Discourse-functional Study , Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Yun, Weonhee, Yoon, Kyuchul, Park, Sunwoo, Lee, Juhee, Cho, Sungmoon, Kang, Ducksoo, Byun, Koonhyuk, Hahn, Hyeseung and Kim, Jungsun (2015), The Korean Corpus of Spontaneous Speech , Daegu: Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, Keimyung University (Distributor).
  • Yumoto, Eiji, Gould, Wilbur J. and Baer, Thomas (1982), Harmonics‐to‐noise Ratio as an Index of the Degree of Hoarseness, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 71 (6), 1544-1550.
  • Young, Richard F. and Lee, Jina (2004), Identifying Units in Interaction: Reactive Tokens in Korean and English Conversations, Journal of Sociolinguistics , 8 (3), 380-407.
  • Yngve, Victor (1970), On Getting a Word in Edgewise, In: Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society, 567‐557.
  • Xu, Yi (2013), ProsodyPro — A Tool for Large-scale Systematic Prosody Analysis, In: Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody-2013 , Aix-en-Provence, France, 7-10.
  • Ward, Nigel (2004), Pragmatic Functions of Prosodic Features in Non-lexical Utterances, In: Speech Prosody-2004 , Nara, Japan, 325-328.
  • Ward, Nigel (1996), Using Prosodic Clues to Decide When to Produce Back-channel Utterances, In: Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing , Philadelphia, USA, 1728-1731.
  • Ward, Gregory and Hirschberg, Julia (1985), Implicating Uncertainty: The Pragmatics of Fall-Rise Intonation, Language , 61 (4), 747-776.
  • Van Zyl, Marianne and Hanekom, Johan J. (2013), When “okay” is Not Okay: Acoustic Characteristics of Single-word Prosody Conveying Reluctance, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 133 (1), EL13-EL19.
  • Truong, Khiet P. and Heylen, Dirk (2010), Disambiguating the Functions of Conversational Sounds with Prosody: the Case of 'yeah ', In: Processing of INTERSPEECH-2010 , Makuhari, Japan, 2254-2557.
  • Tench, Paul (1996), The Intonation Systems of English , New York and London, Cassell.
  • Stocksmeier, Thorsten, Kopp, Stefan and Gibbon, Dafydd (2007), Synthesis of Prosodic Attitudinal Variants in German Backchannel ‘ja’, In: Processing of INTERSPEECH-2007 , Antwerp, Belgium, 1290-1293.
  • Sohn, Sung-Ock S. and Kim, Stephanie H. (2014), The Interplay of Discourse and Prosody at the Left and Right Periphery in Korean: An Analysis of kuntey ‘but’, In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (Eds.), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change (pp. 221-249), Brill Leiden, Netherlands.
  • Silverman, Kim, Beckman, Mary, Pitrelli, John, Ostendorf, Mari, Wightman, Colin, Price, Patti, Pierrehumbert, Janet and Hirschberg, Julia (1992), ToBI: A Standard for Labeling English Prosody, In: Processing of Second International Conference on Spoken Language , Banff, Canada, 867-870.
  • Shriberg, Elizabeth, Stolcke, Bates, Rebecca, Stolcke, Andreas, Taylor, Paul, Jurafsky, Daniel, Ries, Klaus, Coccaro, Noah, Martin, Rachel, Meteer, Marie and Van Ess-Dykema, Carol (1998), Can Prosody Aid the Automatic Classification of Dialog Acts in Conversational Speech?, Language and Speech , 41 (3-4), 443-492.
  • Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1980), The Role of Prosodic Categories in English Word Stress, Linguistic inquiry , 11 (3), 563-605.
  • Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1978), On Prosodic Structure and Its Relation to Syntactic Structure , Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
  • Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan (1994), Prosody, Syntax, and Discourse Pragmatics: Assessing Information Flow in German Conversation , Doctoral dissertation, University of California.
  • Schourup, Lawrence C. (2016), Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation, n.p., Routledge.
  • Schourup, Lawrence (1999), Discourse markers: Tutorial Overview, Lingua , 107 (3), 227-265.
  • Schiffrin, Deborah (1987), Discourse Markers , Cambridge, Cambridge University.
  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1982), Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘uh huh’ and Other Things that Come between Sentences, In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics (pp. 71-93), Washington DC, Georgetown University Press.
  • Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Jefferson, Gail (1974), A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation, language , 50 (4), 696-735.
  • R Development Core Team (2017), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing , R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <https://www.R-project.org/>.
  • Quinlan, J. Ross (1993), C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , California, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  • Prasad, Sankalan and Bali, Kalika (2010), Prosody Cues For Classification of the Discourse Particle “h ” in Hindi, In: Processing of INTERSPEECH-2010, Makuhari, Japan, 1776-1779.
  • Pitt, Mark A., Dilley, Johnson, Keith, Kiesling, Scott, Raymond, William, Hume, Elizabeth and Fosler-Lussier, Eric (2007), Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech (2nd release), Columbus, Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, <www.buckeyecorpus.osu.edu>.
  • Pitrelli, John F., Beckman, Mary E. and Hirschberg, Julia (1994), Evaluation of Prosodic Transcription Labeling Reliability in the ToBI Framework, In International Conference on Spoken Language Processing , 1 , 123-126.
  • Pierrehumbert, Janet and Hirschberg, Julia (1990), The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse, In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan and Martha E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271-311), London, MIT Press.
  • Pierrehumbert, Janet (1980), The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation, Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Ochs, Elinor (1986), From Feeling to Grammar: a Samoan Case Study, In Schieffelin, Bambi B. and Ochs, Elinor (Eds.), Language Socialization across Cultures (pp. 251-272), New York, Cambridge University.
  • McLemore, Cynthia (1990), The Interpretation of L*H in English, Texas Linguistic Forum-Discourse , 32 , 127-147.
  • Lyons, John (1995), Linguistic semantics: An introduction , New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • Lyons, John (1982), Deixis and Subjectivity: Loquor, Ergo Sum?, In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (Eds.), Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics (pp. 101-124), Chichester and New York, John Wiley.
  • Lee-Goldman, Russell (2011), No as A Discourse Marker. Journal of Pragmatics , 43 (10), 2627-2649.
  • Lee, Yong Eun (2007), On the Role of Intonation and Pauses in the Interpretation of English Parenthetical Adverbs, The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal , 15 , 85-107.
  • Lambertz, Kathrin (2011), Back-channelling: The Use of yeah and mm to Portray Engaged Listenership, Griffiths Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication , 4 (1/2), 11-18.
  • Ladd, D. Robert (1996), Intonational Phonology , New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • Labov, William (1984), Intensity. In Deborah Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 43-70), Washington DC, Georgetown University Press.
  • Kowtko, J. C. (1996), The Function of Intonation in Task-oriented Dialogue . University of Edinburgh.
  • Kiss, Ivan and Ennis, Tricia (2001), Age-related Decline in Perception of Prosodic Affect, Applied Neuropsychology , 8 (4), 251-254.
  • Jun, Sun-Ah (2000), K-ToBI(Korean ToBI) Labeling Conventions (version 3.1), UCLA working papers in phonetics , (99), 149-173.
  • Jucker, Andreas H. and Smith, Sara W. (1998), And People Just You Know Like 'wow': Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies, In Andreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv (Eds.), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory (pp. 171-201), Amsterdam and Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
  • Jones, Daniel (1967), The Phoneme, Its Nature and Its Use , 3rd ed, Heffer, Cambridge.
  • Jespersen, Otto (2013), The Philosophy of Grammar , London and New York, Routledge.
  • Jefferson, Gail (1983), Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgement Tokens “yeah ” and “mm hm”, In Gail Jefferson (Ed.), Two Papers on Transitory Recipientship (pp. 1-18), Tilburg, Tilburg University.
  • Jaffe, Alexandra (2009), Introduction: the Sociolinguistics of Stance, In Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp. 3-28), New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Hunston, Susan and Thompson, Geoff (2000), Evaluation: An Introduction, In Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 1-27), New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Hunston, Susan (1993), Evaluation and Ideology in Scientific Writing, In Mohsen Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 57-73), London, Pinter.
  • Halliday, Michael A. K. and Matthiessen, Christian M. (2004), An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 3rd ed, London and New York, Routledge.
  • Hall, Mark, Frank, Eibe, Holmes, Geoffrey, Pfahringer, Bernhard, Reutemann, Peter and Witten, Ian H. (2009), The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update, ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter , 11 (1), 10-18.
  • Gussenhoven, Carlos (2004), The phonology of Tone and Intonation , New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • Grivičić, Tamara and Nilep, Chad (2004), When Phonation Matters: The Use and Function of yeah and Creaky Voice, Colorado Research in Linguistics , 17(1), 1-11.
  • Gravano, Agustin, Hirschberg, Julia and Beňuš, Štefan (2012), Affirmative Cue Words in Task-oriented Dialogue. Computational Linguistics , 38 (1), 1-39.
  • Gravano, Agustin and Hirschberg, Julia (2009), Backchannel-inviting Cues in Task-oriented Dialogue, In: Processing of INTERSPEECH-2009 , Brighton, UK, 1019-1022.
  • Gardner, Rod (2001), When listeners talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance , Vol.92, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
  • Gardner, Rod (1997), The Conversation Object Mm : A Weak and Variable Acknowledging Token, Research on Language and Social Interaction , 30 (2), 131-156.
  • Functions and Prosodic Features of Discourse Marker ‘mweo’(뭐)
    Song, In Seong Korean Linguistics , 58 , 83-106 [2013]
  • Freeman, Valerie (2015), The Phonetics of Stance-taking , Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
  • Fraser, Bruce (1999), What Are Discourse Markers?, Journal of Pragmatics , 31(7), 931–952.
  • Faerch, Claus and Kasper, Gabriele (1982), Phatic, Metalingual and Metacommunicative Functions in Discourse: Gambits and Repairs , Finland, Abo Akademi.
  • Du Bois, John W. (2007), The Stance Triangle, In Robert Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction , Vol.164, (pp. 139-182), Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
  • Drummond, Kent and Hopper, Robert (1993b), Back Channels Revisited: Acknowledgment Tokens and Speakership Incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction , 26 (2), 157–177.
  • Drummond, Kent and Hopper, Robert (1993a), Some Uses of “yeah ”, Research on Language and Social Interaction , 26 (2), 203–212.
  • Cruttenden, Alan (1997), Intonation , New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • Chafe, Wallace (1986), Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing, Evidentiality: The linguistic Coding of Epistemology , 20 , 261-272.
  • Cha, Jihyeon (2010), Interaction of Prosody and Discourse Function: Based on the Korean Discourse Marker “mwe” in the Sentence-final Position. Language Facts and Perspectives , 25 , 227-256.
  • Brinton, Laurel J. (1996), Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions , Vol. 19, Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David (2017), Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer, Computer Program (version 6.0.25), 11 February 2017, <http://www.praat.org/>.
  • Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, and Finegan, Edward (1999), Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , London, Longman.
  • Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward (1989), Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect, Text , 9 , 93-124.
  • Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward (1988), Adverbial Stance Types in English, Discourse Processes, 11 , 1-34.
  • Biber, Douglas (2006), Stance in Spoken and Written University Registers, Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 5(2) , 97-116.
  • Biber, Douglas (1985), Investigating Macroscopic Textual Variation through Multifeature/Multidimensional Analyses, Linguistics , 23 (2), 337-360.
  • Beňuš, Štefan, Gravano, Agustin and Hirschberg, Julia (2007b), Prosody, Emotions, and…‘whatever’, In: Processing of INTERSPEECH-2007 , Antwerp, Belgium, 2629-2632.
  • Beňuš, Štefan, Gravano, Agustin and Hirschberg, Julia (2007a), The prosody of backchannels in American English, In Proceedings of ICPhS, 1065-1068.
  • Bednarek, Monika (2006), Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus, Discourse Studies , 10 (6), 817-819.
  • Beckman, Mary E. and Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1986), Intonational Structure in Japanese and English, Phonology , 3 (1), 255-309.
  • Beckman, Mary E. and Hirschberg, Julia (1994), The ToBI Annotation Conventions, Computer Science, Columbia University, 5 June 2017, <http://www.cs.columbia.edu/?sa=GO&s=1&q=The+ToBI+annotation+conventions>.
  • Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Deh , Nicole and Wichmann, Anne (2009), Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics: Research at the Interface, In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Nicole Deh and Anne Wichmann (Eds.), Where prosody meets pragmatics , Vol.8, (pp. 1-20), UK, BRILL.
  • Aijmer, Karin (1996), Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity, London and New York, Longman.
  • Abercombie, David (1967), Elements of General Phonetics , Chicago, Aldine.
  • (linuxrules@naver.com), 「IdentifyTargetWord.praat」, E-mail to 임선희(imimsunny@gmail.com)
    윤규철 년 11월 4일 [2014]
  • "세종 코퍼스 분석을 통한 우리말 ""예/네""의 담화 표지 기능 연구"
    김선회 임선희 사회언어학, 제22권 제1호, 한국사회언어학회, 203-223쪽 [2014]