박사

역사적 사고에 대한 인식론적 고찰의 역사교육적 함의

윤종필 2018년
논문상세정보
' 역사적 사고에 대한 인식론적 고찰의 역사교육적 함의' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 구성주의
  • 메타인지
  • 실용주의
  • 역사적 사고
  • 인식론적 회의주의
  • 일상적 유용성
  • 포스트모더니즘
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,076 0

0.0%

' 역사적 사고에 대한 인식론적 고찰의 역사교육적 함의' 의 참고문헌

  • 歷史映畵를 活用한 歷史的 思考力 伸張 方案
    최영심 『역사와세계』 26, , pp.189~223 [2002]
  • 피아제의 인지발달론과 역사교육연구
    김한종 『사회과학교육연구』 1, , pp.19~68 [1995]
  • 포스트모더니즘과 당혹스런 역사학
    임상우 『서양사론』71, , pp.195~213 [2001]
  • 인지 과정으로서의 역사적 사고와 교수 적용
    李英孝 『사회과학연구』 3, , pp.357~375 [1993]
  • 역사적 사고력과 평가의 문제
    崔完基 『역사교육』55, , pp.135~139 [1994]
  • 비판적 역사학과 초등사회과 역사교육
    김원수 『초등사회과교육』14, , pp.85~98 [2002]
  • 미국의 자국사 교육
    李智媛(Lee Ji-Won) 『역사교육』100, , pp.103~130 [2006]
  • 미국의 세계사 교과서 내용 분석
    강선주 『사회과교육』43, , pp.137~166 [2004]
  • 박사
  • 가짜 뉴스와 사실확인 보도
    이준웅 『관훈저널』143, , pp.33~40 [2017]
  • 編, 『한국역사교육의 연구동향』
    양호환 책과함께 [2011]
  • 編, 『한국 교육평가의 쟁점과 대안』
    황정규 교육과학사 [2000]
  • 編, 『오늘의 역사학』
    안병직 한겨레신문사 [1998]
  • 編, 『수행평가의 이론과 실제』
    백순근 원미사 [1998]
  • 編, 『교과교육평가의 이론과 실제』
    백순근 원미사 [2003]
  • 『학습을 위한 수행평가』
    석문주 교육과학사 [1998]
  • 『포스트모더니즘과 역사학』
    김기봉 푸른역사 [2002]
  • 『이원순교수정년기념역사학논총』
  • 『역사철학』
    이수윤 한국교원대학교 출판부 [2002]
  • 『역사교육의 이론과 방법』
    양호환 삼지원 [2009]
  • 『수행평가의 이론과 실제』
    윤인경 교학사 [2000]
  • 『수행평가 100% 이렇게 한다』
    홍정숙 교육과학사 [1999]
  • 『복합의 시각: 역사교육 새로보기』
    강선주 한울아카데미 [2015]
  • 『다시 역사란 무엇인가』
    허승일 서울대학교출판문화원 [2009]
  • 『국가 교육과정에 근거한 평가 기준 및 도구개발 연구: 고등 학교 국사』
    이명희 [1998]
  • 『‘역사란 무엇인가’를 넘어서: E.H.카의 모던 역사학에서 포스트 모던 열린 역사로』
    김기봉 푸른역사 [2000]
  • 『20세기 사학사: 포스트모더니즘의 도전, 역사학은 끝났는가?』
  • 『2015 개정 교육과정: 중학교 역사』
    교육부 [2015]
  • 『2015 개정 교육과정: 고등학교 한국사』
    교육부 [2015]
  • 「회화 사료의 독해와 발문 방안의 연구」
    권오현 『사회과교육연구』13, , pp.1~24 [2006]
  • 「현대사의 주요 경향」
    차하순 『역사와 현실』26, , pp.218~238 [1997]
  • 「한국전쟁 관련 교과서 비교 분석: 남,북한, 미국, 중국 교과서 를 중심으로」
    박은영 경희대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2007]
  • 「한국과 미국의 세계사 교과서에서 미국사의 서술 분석」
    김효진 경희 대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2007]
  • 「한국과 미국의 세계사 교과서 비교 분석」
    박종립 인하대학교 교육대 학원 석사학위논문 [2010]
  • 「한국과 미국 초등사회과 역사 영역 교육과정 비교,분석」
    함정림 서 울교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2006]
  • 「한,미 역사 교육과정 비교 연구」
    김현숙 『사림』28, , pp.77~118 [2007]
  • 「포스트모던 시대의 한국사 인식과 역사교육」
    서의식 『역사교육』80, , pp.1~30 [2001]
  • 「포스트모던 시대 학교 역사지식의 구성 양식과 스캐폴딩을 활용 한 ‘함께 역사하기’ 방안」
    신진균 경상대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2014]
  • 「포스트모더니즘의 역사 기술과 문학사 기술」
    라영균 『외국문학연 구』37, , pp.111~130 [2010]
  • 「포스트모더니즘 시대의 역사학: 역사학의 실용성 문제」
    이상현 『역사 교육』70, , pp.66~93 [1999]
  • 「포스트모더니즘 시대의 역사 이해: K. 젠킨스의 논의를 중심으 로 인간연구2, 」
    장동하 『 』 , pp.66~92 [2001]
  • 「최근 미국 초등 역사교육 연구의 동향」
    주웅영 『초등교육연구논총』 19, , pp.153~182 [2003]
  • 박사
  • 「초등사회과 학습 환경과 웹기반 학습 모형 : 역사적 사고력 학 습 환경 요인을 중심으로」
    박기범 『사회과교육』45, , pp.153~172 [2006]
  • 「참여와 소통을 위한 사이버 커뮤니티 활용 한국근현대사 수행 평가 사례 연구」
    조두형 서울시립대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2005]
  • 「지리,역사 장소 답사를 중심으로 한 학습내용 구성 및 평가 방법」
    안재섭 『한국사진지리학회지』23, , pp.61~74 [2013]
  • 「중학교에서 역사적 사고력 신장을 위한 독도교육 방안」
    이상분 『역 사교육논집』52, , pp.1~35 [2014]
  • 「중학교 역사 교과서의 고대 로마 단원 서술 비교,분석: 한국과 미국 교과서를 중심으로」
    이준연 서강대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2014]
  • 박사
    「중학교 국사과에서의 포트폴리오 수업 평가의 활용」
    이정윤 고려대학 교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2004]
  • 박사
  • 「중등학교 역사교육에서 평가의 실제와 문제점」
    신영창 『역사와 역사 교육』12, , pp.53~78 [2006]
  • 「중등학교 국사과 수행평가 유형 및 평가기준 개발」
    김윤철 전북대학 교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2003]
  • 「주관식 문항 평가,학습지도와 역사적 사고력의 신장 효과」
    우경득 안동대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2003]
  • 「종말론 시대, 역사이야기의 귀환」
    김기봉 『서강인문논총』23, pp.55~76 [2008]
  • 「이승만의 대미외교를 통한 국가생존 전략(1895-」
    이철순 『한국 정치연구』21, 2012, pp.179~206 [1953]
  • 「웹기반 문제중심학습(PBL)을 적용한 중학교 국사 수행평가 설계와 구현」
    조성은 한서대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2005]
  • 「오늘의 역사학은 무엇을 할 수 있는가: 어느 서양사학도의 독 백」
    이영석 『역사학연구』12, , pp.311~333 [1998]
  • 「영국의 역사교육과정과 미국의 역사표준서(1996)에서 내 용 선정 및 구성의 개념으로서의 젠더」
    강선주 『한국여성학』24, 2008, pp.187~220 [1991]
  • 「영국의 역사교육과 국가교육과정」
    김중락 『역사교육논집』25, , pp.165~198 [1999]
  • 「영국 역사교육 연구의 동향」
    김중락 『역사교육논집』38, , pp.95~123 [2007]
  • 「역사학의 위기와 새로운 역사로서의 문화사」
    조승래 『인문과학논집』 22, , pp.279~292 [2000]
  • 「역사학습의 인식론적 모색」
    양호환 『역사교육』75, , pp.1~21 [2000]
  • 박사
    「역사적 상상력의 신장을 위한 수행평가 활용」
    송일승 경상대학교 교 육대학원 석사학위논문 [2002]
  • 「역사적 사고력의 학습 및 평가방안」
    최상훈 서울대학교 대학원 박사 학위논문 [2000]
  • 「역사적 사고력을 신장시키기 위한 사료학습 방안」
    송춘영 『초등사회 과교육』2, , pp.29~57 [1986]
  • 「역사적 사고력 신장을 위한 초등 사회과 포트폴리오 평가 도구 개발 및 적용」
    정광호 전주교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2006]
  • 「역사적 사고력 신장을 위한 수행평가 방안」
    배정선 『교과교육연구』 1, , pp.237~266 [2008]
  • 「역사적 사고력 신장을 위한 사료학습 연구」
    김지수 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [1997]
  • 「역사수업 구성의 원리와 함의」
    전병철 『역사교육』126, , pp.1~37 [2013]
  • 「역사서술은 사실의 발견인가, 허구의 창작인가?」
    이한구 『한국사학사 학보』18, , pp.123~150 [2008]
  • 「역사글쓰기를 통한 역사학습의 접근방향」
    문창로 『중등교육연구』 53, , pp.257~282 [2005]
  • 「역사교육을 위한 사료학습 연구」
    서굉일 『역사교육』26, , pp.1~31 [1979]
  • 「역사교육용 기록정보 콘텐츠의 사례 분석: 역사적 사고 력 신장을 중심으로」
    신예진 최재황 『한국도서관정보학회 하계 학술발표회』, , pp.135~139 [2014]
  • 「역사교육에서 총괄을 이용한 향토사료의 활용방안」
    조원찬 『역사와 역사교육』5, , pp.133~167 [2000]
  • 「역사교육에서 인지발달에 관한 몇 가지 문제」
    양호환 『역사교육』58, , pp.1~38 [1995]
  • 「역사교육에서 ‘글쓰기 수업’의 실천과 연구 동향」
    방지원 『역사교육 연구』17, , pp.107~150 [2013]
  • 「역사교육에 있어서 사료학습의 접근방안」
    한상준 『교육연구지』20, , pp.15~39 [1980]
  • 「역사교육 평가연구의 현황과 과제」
    최상훈 『역사교육』113, , pp.37~69 [2010]
  • 「역사교육 개념어의 용례 검토」
    김한종 『역사교육』113, , pp.1~36 [2010]
  • 「역사과에서 창의력을 길러주는 수행평가」
    신진균 『내일을여는역사』 1, , pp.132~147 [2001]
  • 「역사과 수행평가의 실제와 평가도구개발」
    한경아 고려대학교 교육대 학원 석사학위논문 [2002]
  • 「역사과 서술형 평가의 필요성과 개선방안」
    방지원 『역사교육연구』 11, , pp.139~183 [2010]
  • 「역사과 서술형 평가의 실제와 개선 방향」
    김동준 『중등우리교육』12, , pp.158~163 [1998]
  • 「역사과 논쟁문제 교수,학습방안: ‘아랍,이스라엘분쟁’ 을 중심으로」
    이윤주 이종경 『역사교육연구』10, , pp.47~84 [2009]
  • 「역사 학습에서 ‘탐구’의 재고: 실제적 탐구의 가능성」
    민윤 『사회과교 육연구』11, , pp.1~26 [2007]
  • 「역사 수업에서 문자 사료 읽으며 역사적으로 사고하기 방안」
    강선주 『경인교육대학교 교육논총』31, , pp.97~120 [2011]
  • 「역사 교육에서 감정이입의 문제: 영국에서의 논의를 중 심으로」
    김한종 조승래 『역사교육』73, , pp.200~212 [2000]
  • 「역사 교과서 탐구활동 분석 평가 연구」
    강현욱 김민정 『역사교육논집』 49, , pp.197~229 [2012]
  • 「신문화사의 역사인식에 기초한 역사교재 재구성과 활용」
    안병갑 『역 사교육연구』2, , pp.95~137 [2005]
  • 「수행평가에 대한 학생들의 인식에 관한 연구 중학교 국사수업 을 중심으로」
    박수진 성균관대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2003]
  • 「수행평가를 활용한 향토사 지도 방안: 순천 지역의 향토 문화재 를 중심으로」
    권옥영 전남대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2005]
  • 「서평: 김기봉 외, 『포스트모더니즘과 역사학』」
    백종률 『서양사론』 73, , pp.251~260 [2002]
  • 「생활사 학습의 과정에 나타난 추체험의 양상」
    민윤 『사회과교육연 구』12, , pp.83~104 [2005]
  • 「사회과에서의 비판적 사고력 교육」
    김재형 『사회과교육』29, , pp.39~63 [1996]
  • 「사료를 이용한 인물학습 : 하향응을 중심으로」
    김문희 『한국기록관리 학회 학술발표논문집』, , 61~87 [2006]
  • 「비판적 역사 글쓰기 수행 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발」
    양치구 『역사교 육논집』51, , pp.79~128 [2013]
  • 「미국의 주 단위 역사 표준시험과 성적책임제」
    김유리 『역사교육논 집』49, , pp.231~256 [2014]
  • 「미국의 역사교육, 그 역사와 문제점」
    양호환 『역사와현실』7, , pp.192~211 [1992]
  • 「미국의 역사교육 연구 현황」
    강선주 『역사교육논집』38, , pp.151~189 [2007]
  • 「미국과 영국의 대조선 수호조약 교섭 과정 연구」
    이근욱 정민경 『동아연구』61, , pp.103~131 [2011]
  • 「미국 역사표준서 논쟁 연구」
    정경희 『역사교육』89, , pp.35~64 [2004]
  • 「미국 역사교육의 새로운 동향: 『미국사를 위한 국가표준』의 성립과 그 의미」
    배한극 『역사교육논집』23, , pp.597~626 [1999]
  • 「미국 세계사 교육 속의 지구사」
    박혜정 『역사학보』201, pp.303~334
  • 「미국 사회과 교육의 행로」
    Richard E. Cross, 『역사교육』58, , pp.165~168 [1995]
  • 「미국 사회과 교육에 대한 일고찰: 역사교육을 중심으로」
    이원정 청주 대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2010]
  • 「미국 대학의 자국사 교육의 역사와 현실」
    순세호 『역사와 현실』52, , pp.121~148 [2004]
  • 「드로이젠과 역사주의」
    최성철 『한국사학사학보』24, , pp.127~163 [2011]
  • 「대학수학능력시험에서의 역사적 사고력 평가방안」
    김규태 고려대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2008]
  • 「다시 일어 선 역사: 최근 미국 역사교육 강화와 관련하여」
    윤세철 『역사교육』62, , pp.1~35 [1997]
  • 「다시 미국의 “문화 충돌”: 텍사스 사회 교과서, AP 미국사 교 육과정, 『공통 핵심』논쟁」
    강선주 『역사교육논집』56, , pp.37~67 [2015]
  • 「누가 포스트모던을 두려워하랴 : 열린 역사학을 위한 하나의 제 언」
    김기봉 『역사학보』161, , pp.185~209 [1999]
  • 「내러티브 교재와 역사 학습」
    안정애 『역사교육』103, , pp.35~67 [2007]
  • 「글로벌 히스토리 관점에서 본 미국의 세계사 교육」
    이수진 한국교원 대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2013]
  • 박사
    「국사과 독서 수행평가의 타당성 연구」
    김영아 인하대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2009]
  • 「국사 교수ㆍ학습의 효율성 제고를 위한 포트폴리오 전략」
    최완기 『역 사교육』70, , pp.95~143 [1999]
  • 「고등학생의 사료이해 양상」
    최상훈 『사회과교육』145, , pp.145~208 [2006]
  • 「고등학교 세계사 교과서의 십자군 전쟁 서술 비교,분석」
    김균량 서 강대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 [2011]
  • 「고등학교 국사에서 향토사를 활용한 수행평가 방안: 천안 향토 사를 중심으로」
    김재곤 『역사와 역사교육』16, , pp.41~78 [2008]
  • 「고등학교 국사과에서의 수행 평가 연구」
    오정현 이화여자대학교 교육 대학원 석사학위논문 [1999]
  • 「경복궁 관광을 통한 역사교육과 역사적 사고력 향상에 관한 연 구」
    진병렬 『문명연지』7, , pp.101~118 [2006]
  • 「간학문적 통합 관점에 따른 미국 역사 교과서 분석」
    민경화 한국교원 대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2004]
  • 「『한국 근,현대사』 교과서에 실린 사료의 비교 분석과 제시 방안」
    박진동 『역사교육』12, , pp.217~254 [2008]
  • 「『선조실록』과 『선조수정실록』을 통한 사료비교학습」
    김보림 『교육 연구』51, , pp. 105~130 [2011]
  • 「『미국 역사 표준서』와 개정판을 둘러싼 논쟁」
    손세호 『미국학논 집』36, , pp.102~130 [2004]
  • 「‘포스트모더니즘 시대’에 보는 그람시의 ‘역사주의’」
    이해영 『역사비 평』36, , pp.295~316 [1997]
  • 박사
  • 「Current Trends in Education for American History in the USA」
    장재영 『전북사학』46, , pp.337~363 [2015]
  • 「16세기 동아시아 속의 조선과 『國朝征討錄』의 편찬」
    정해은 『장서 각』29, , pp.44~70 [2013]
  • 「-90년대 미국의 자국사 교육 강화 논쟁」
    음영훈 순천대학교 교 육대학원 석사학위논문, 2010 [1980]
  • “보르헤스와 미셸 푸코의 역사관 비교"
    윤지하 『중남미연구』19, , pp.181~195 [2000]
  • Yurbok Lee and Wayne Patterson(ed.), Korean-American Relations, 1866-1997(Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999).
  • Wulf Kansteiner, “Success, Truth, and Modernism in Holocaust Historiography: Reading Saul Friedl nder Thirty-Five Years after the Publication of ‘Metahistory’”, History and Theory, Vol. 48(2009), pp.25~53.
  • William James, “Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth”, The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, Vol. 4(1907), pp.141~155.
  • William James, The Principles of Psychology, Volume 1(Courier Corporation, 2012).
  • William James, The Principles of Psychology(New York: H. Holt and Company, 1890).
  • William James, Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking(New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1922).
  • William H. Sewell, Work and Revolution in France: The Language of Labor from the Old Regime to 1848(New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980).
  • William G. Aston, A History of Japanese Literature(Heinemann, 1899).
  • Willard V. O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View: Logico-Philosophical Essays (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961).
  • Wayne Petherick, Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues in Behavioral Profiling(Boston: Elsevier Academic Press, 2009).
  • Virginia Richardson, “Constructivist Pedagogy”, Teachers College Record, Vol. 105(2003), pp.1623~1640.
  • Tyler Dennett, Americans in Eastern Asia: A Critical Study of United States’ Policy in the Far East in the Nineteenth Century(New York: Barnes & Noble, 1963).
  • Trygve R. Tholfsen, Historical Thinking: An Introduction (New York: Harper and Row, 1967).
  • Tōru Haga(ed.), Collected Works of William George Aston, Volume 1(Bristol: GaneshaPub, 1997).
  • Tony Brueckner, “Skepticism and Content Externalism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta(ed.), forthcoming URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/skepticism-content-externalism/>.
  • Tom Koch, “Mapping the Miasma: Air, Health, and Place in Early Medical Mapping”, Cartographic Perspectives, Vol. 52(2005), pp.4~27.
  • Tim Huijgen, Carla van Boxtel, Wim van de Grift, and Paul Holthuis, “Testing Elementary and Secondary School Students’ Ability to Perform Historical Perspective Taking: the Constructing of Valid and Reliable Measure Instruments”, European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. 29(2014), pp.653~672.
  • Thomas Tymoczko(ed.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Mathematics: An Anthology(Boston: Birkhaü ser, 1986).
  • Thomas L. Haskell, Objectivity Is Not Neutrality: Explanatory Schemes in History(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,1998).
  • Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970).
  • Thomas D. Fallace, “Once More unto the Breach: Trying to Get Preservice Teachers to Link Historiographical Knowledge to Pedagogy”, Theory and Research in Social Education, Vol. 35(2007), pp.427~446.
  • Thomas D. Fallace and Johann N. Neem, “Historiographical Thinking: Towards a New Approach to Preparing History Teachers”, Theory and Research in Social Education, Vol. 33(2005), pp.329~346.
  • Theodore Roosevelt, Joseph B. Bishop(ed.), Theodore Roosevelt and His Time Shown in His Own Letters, Vol. I(New York: C. Scribner’s Sons, 1920).
  • Theodor R. Sizer, Horace’s Compromise: The Dilemma of the American High School (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2004).
  • Teun G. van Manen et. al., “Assessing Social Cognitive Skills in Aggressive Children from a Developmental Perspective: The Social Cognitive Skills Test”, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Vol. 8(2001), pp.341~351.
  • Takashi Shogimen, “On the Elusiveness of Context”, History and Theory, Vol. 55(2016), pp.233~252.
  • Suzanne Donovan et al.(ed.), How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom(Washington: National Academies Press, 2005).
  • Susan M. Brookhart and Daniel T. Durkin, “Classroom Assessment, Student Motivation, and Achievement in High School Social Studies Classes”, Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 16(2003), pp.27~54.
  • Susan Hacck, “Pragmatism, Old and New”, Contemporary Pragmatism, Vol. 1(2004), pp.3~41.
  • Stuart Brock and Edwin D. Mares, Realism and Anti-Realism(Stocksfield: Acumen, 2007).
  • Stephen P. Dundis and Bruce R. Fehn, “Historical Thinking Skills and Computerized Archives: Exploring the American Journey CD~ROM Series”, The Social Studies, Vol. 90(1999), pp.273~277.
  • Stephen M. Coleman and Richard N. Kocsis, The Unexplored Ethics of Criminal Psychological Profiling(Goulburn: The Authors, 2000).
  • Stephen J. Thornton, “History and Social Studies: A Question of Philosophy”, International Journal of Social Education, Vol. 20(2005), pp.1~5.
  • Stephen J. Thornton and Keith C. Barton, “Can History Stand Alone? Drawbacks and Blind Spots of a ‘Disciplinary’ Curriculum”, Teachers College Record, Vol. 112(2010), pp.2471~2495.
  • St phane L vesque, Thinking Historically: Educating Students for the Twenty-first Century(Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009).
  • Sherri R. Colby, “Students as Historians: The Historical Narrative Inquiry Model’s Impact on Historical Thinking and Historical Empathy”, Doctoral diss., University of North Texas, 2007.
  • Sheri E. Stover, Shifting Toward Learning-Centered Principles: A Faculty Development Experiment(ProQuest, 2006).
  • Seungyoung Kim, American Diplomacy and Strategy toward Korea and Northeast Asia(New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).
  • Saul Friedländer(ed.), Probing the Limits of Representation(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992)
  • Sarah Drake Brown, “Preparing Effective History Teachers: The Assessment Gap”, The Journal of Social Studies Research, Vol. 37(2013), pp.167~177.
  • Sam Wineburg, “Historical Problem Solving: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary and Pictorial Evidence”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 83(1991), pp.73-87.
  • Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past(Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001).
  • Ruth Anna Putnam(ed.), The Cambridge Companion to William James(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
  • Rosalyn Ashby and Peter Lee, “Children’s Ideas about Testing Historical Claims and of the Status of Historical Accounts”, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, 1996.
  • Ronald W. Evans, The Social Studies Wars: What Should We Teach the Children?(New York: Teachers College Press, 2004).
  • Ronald V. Morris, Bringing History to Life: First-Person Historical Presentations in Elementary and Middle School Social Studies(Lanham: R& L Education, 2009).
  • Robert Petkovsek, Bojan Zalec, and Ciril Sorc; ̌ ̌ ̌ Michal Valcǒ (ed.), Truth and Compassion: Lessons from the Past and Premonitions of the Future(Zur̈ ich: Lit, cop. 2017).
  • Robert Parkes, “Postmodernism, Historical Denial, and History Dducation: What Frank Ankersmit Can Offer to History Didactics”, Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, Vol. 2(2013), 20~37.
  • Robert E. Stake et al., Case Studies in Science Education(Washington: Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1978).
  • Robert Darnton, The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History(New York: Basic Books, 1999).
  • Robert Brandom, “Knowledge and the Social Articulation of the Space of Reasons”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 55(1995), pp.895~908.
  • Robert B. Bain, “Into the Breach: Using Research and Theory to Shape History Instruction”, The Journal of Education, Vol. 189(2008/2009), pp. 159~167.
  • Richard S. Kirkendall, The Organization of American Historians and the Writing and Teaching of American History(New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).
  • Richard Rorty, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
  • Richard Rorty, Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays, 1972-1980(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982).
  • Richard Rorty(ed.), The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method(Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992).
  • Richard J. Evans, In Defense of History(London: Granta Books, 1997).
  • Richard H. Brown, “Learning how to learn: The Amherst Project and History Education in the Schools”, The Social Studies, Vol. 87(1996), pp.267~273.
  • Rexford, G. Brown, Schools of Thought: How the Politics of Literacy Shape Thinking in the Classroom(San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991).
  • Ren e E. Weiss, “Designing Problems to Promote Higher-Order Thinking”, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 95(2003), pp.25~31.
  • Ren Descartes, Stanley Tweyman et al.(ed.), Meditations on First Philosophy in Focus(New York: Routledge, 1993).
  • R. N. Hallam, “Logical Thinking in History”, Educational Review, Vol. 19(1967), pp.183~202.
  • Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics, Volume 1(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002).
  • Q. Edward Wang and Georg G. Iggers(ed.), Turning Points in Historiography: A Cross-cultural Perspective(Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2002).
  • Peter Stearns, Peter Seixas, and Sam Wineburg(ed.), Knowing, Teaching, and Learning History(New York: New York University Press, 2000).
  • Peter Seixas, “‘Scaling Up’ the Benchmarks of Historical Thinking: A Report on the Vancouver Meetings”, February 14-15, 2008.
  • Peter Seixas, “Student Teachers Thinking Historically”, Journal Theory & Research in Social Education, Vol. 26(1998), pp.310-341.
  • Peter Seixas(ed.), Theorizing Historical Consciousness(Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004).
  • Peter Seixas and Tom Morton, The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts(Toronto: Nelson Education, 2013).
  • Peter Seixas and Jill Colyer, “Assessment of Historical Thinking: A Report on the Annual Meeting of the Historical Thinking Project, January 18-20, 2012”. Vancouver: CSHC, May 2012.
  • Peter J. Graham, “The Theoretical Diagnosis of Skepticism”, Synthese, Vol. 158(2007), pp.19~39.
  • Peter Burke, What Is Cultural History(Malden: Polity Press, 2004).
  • Peter A. Facione, “Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations”, American Philosophical Association (1990).
  • Perez Zagorin, “History, the Referent, and Narrative: Reflections on Postmodernism Now”, History and Theory, Vol. 38(1999), pp.1~24.
  • Paul Gagnon(ed.), Historical Literacy: The Case for History in American Education(Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989).
  • Paul G. Fitchetta and William Benedict Russell, “Reflecting on MACOS: Why It Failed and What We Can Learn from Its Demise”, Paedagogica Historica, Vol. 48(2012), pp.469~484.
  • Patrick Butler and Joe Peppard, “Consumer Purchasing on the Internet: Processes and Prospects”, European Management Journal, Vol. 16(1998), pp.600~610.
  • Orla Muldoon, “Social Group Membership and Perceptions of the Self in Northern Irish Children”, International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 24(2000), pp.330~337.
  • Nicholas Rescher, Epistemology: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge(Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003).
  • National Commission on Excellence in Education, Nation at Risk(Washington: The National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983).
  • Misun Kim,, “Alignment of Classroom History Assessments and the 7th National Curriculum in Korea Assessing Historical Knowledge and Reasoning Skills”, PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 2005.
  • Michel Foucault, The Birth of the Clinic(New York: Pantheon Books, 1973).
  • Michael Williams, “Responsibility and Reliability”, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 37(2008), pp.1~26.
  • Michael Williams, Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
  • Michael D. Lyman, Criminal Investigation: The Art and the Science(Boston: Pearson, 2014).
  • Merrill Sheils, “Why Can’t John Write?” Newsweek, Sep. 8, 1975.
  • Matthias Steup, "Epistemology", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Fall 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta(ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/epistemology/>.
  • Mary A. Britt and Gareth Gabrys, “Implications of Document-Level Literacy Skills for Web Site Design”, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, Vol. 34(2002), pp.170~176.
  • Martin Ballard(ed.), New Movements in the Study and Teaching of History(Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1970).
  • Martin B. Booth, “Students’ Historical Thinking and the History National Curriculum in England” (1992).
  • Martin B. Booth, “Skills, Concepts and Attitudes: The Development of Adolescent Children’s Historical Thinking”, History and Theory, Vol. 22(1983), pp.101~117.
  • Martin B. Booth, “Cognition in History: A British Perspective”, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 29(1994), pp.61~79.
  • Martin B. Booth, “A Modern World History Course and the Thinking of Adolescent Pupils”, Educational Review, Vol. 32(1980), pp.245~257.
  • Mario Carretero, Stefan Berger, and Maria Grever(ed.), Palgrave Handbook of Research in Historical Culture and Education(London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).
  • Mario Carretero, Mikel Asensio, and Maria Rodriguez-Moneo(ed.), History Education and the Construction of National Identities(Charlotte IAP: Information Age Publishing, 2014).
  • Mario Carretero and James F. Voss(ed.), Cognitive and Instructional Processes in History and the Social Sciences(Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994).
  • Margaret Harris, Developmental Psychology: A Student’s Guidebook(New York: Taylor & Francis, 2002).
  • Marek Tamm, “Truth, Objectivity, and Evidence in Historical Writing”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, Vol. 8(2014), pp.265~290.
  • Mar lia Gago, “Interview J rn Rusen Some Ideas on – ̈ the Intersection of Metahistory and History Didactics”, Capa, Vol. 5(2016), pp.171~181.
  • M. Anne Britt and Cindy Aglinskas, “Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information”, Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 20(2002), pp.485~522.
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein, G. E. M. Anscombe(ed.), Philosophical Investigations(Malden: Blackwell, 2001).
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein, G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright(ed.), On Certainty(New York: Harper & Row, 1972).
  • Linda W. Rosenzweig and Thomas P. Weinland, “New Directions of the History Curriculum: A Challenge for the 1980s”, The History Teacher, Vol. 19(1986), pp.263~277.
  • Linda Symcox and Arie Wilschut(ed.), National History Standards: The Problem of the Canon and the Future of Teaching History(Johanneshov: MTM, 2013).
  • Linda S. Levstik and Keith C. Barton, Doing History: Investigating with Children in Elementary and Middle School(Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1997).
  • Linda S. Levstik and Keith Barton, “They Still Use Some of Their Past: Historical Salience in Elementary Children’s Chronological Thinking,” Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 28(1996), pp.531~576.
  • Laurence BonJour, In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of a Priori Justification(New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
  • Laurence BonJour, Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses(Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002).
  • Larry Laudan, “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 48(1981), pp.19~49.
  • Larry Cuban, How Teachers Taught: Constancy and Change in American Classrooms 1880-1990(New York: Teachers College, 1993).
  • Larry A. Hickman and Thomas M. Alexander(ed.), The Essential Dewey: Pragmatism, Education, Democracy, Vol. I(Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998).
  • Kevin Stuart, “A Study of the Relationship between Historical Analysis and Student Achievement in Eighth Grade American History”, Action Research Project, Vanguard University of Southern California, 2010.
  • Kenneth T. Henson, “Foundations for Learner-Centered Education: A Knowledge Base”, Education, Vol. 124(2003), pp.5~16.
  • Kenneth K. Wong, James W. Guthrie, and Douglas N. Harris(ed.), A Nation at Risk: A 20-Year Reappraisal(New York: Routledge, 2005).
  • KeithDeRose and Ted A. Warfield(ed.), Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader(New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).
  • Keith Jenkins, Re-thinking History(London:Routledge, 1991).
  • Keith Jenkins, On ‘What Is History?’: From Carr and Elton to Rorty and White(London: Routledge, 2001)
  • Keith Jenkins(ed.), The Postmodern History Reader(New York: Routledge, 1997).
  • Keith C. Barton and Linda S. Levstik, “Why Don’t More History Teachers Engage Students in Interpretation?” Social Education, Vol. 67(2003), pp.358~361.
  • Keith C. Barton and Linda S. Levstik, Teaching History for the Common Good(Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004).
  • Keith C. Barton and Linda S. Levstik, Researching History Education: Theory, Method, and Context(New York: Routledge, 2008).
  • Keith C. Barton and Alan W. Mccully, “History, Identity, and the School Curriculum in Northern Ireland: An Empirical Study of Secondary Students' Ideas and Perspectives”, Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 37(2005), pp.85~116.
  • Keith Barton, ““I’m Not Saying These Are Going To Be Easy”: Wise Practice in an Urban Elementary School”, Elizabeth A. Yeager and O. L. Davis(ed.), Wise Social Studies Teaching in an Age of High-Stakes Testing: Essays on Classroom Practices and Possibilities(IAP, 2005), pp.11~32.
  • Keith Barton, “‘You’d Be Wanting to Know about the Past’: Social Contexts of Children’s Historical Understanding in Northern Ireland and the United States”, Comparative Education, Vol. 37(2001), pp.89~106.
  • Keith Barton, “‘I Just Kinda Know’: Elementary Students’ Ideas about Historical Evidence”, Theory and Research in Social Education, Vol. 25(1997), pp.407~430.
  • Keith Barton, “Primary Children’s Understanding of the Role of Historical Evidence: Comparisons Between the United States and Northern Ireland”, International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching, and Research, Vol. 1(2001), pp.21~30.
  • Keith Barton, “Agency, Choice and Historical Action: How History Teaching Can Help Students Think about Democratic Decision Making”, Citizenship Teaching & Learning, Vol. 7(2012), pp.131~142.
  • Keith Barton, “A Sociocultural Perspective on Children’s Understanding of Historical Change: Comparative Findings from Northern Ireland and the United States”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol.38(2001), pp.881~913.
  • Kaya Yilmaz, “A Vision of History Teaching and Learning: Thoughts on History Education in Secondary Schools”, High School Journal, Vol. 92(2008), pp.37~46.
  • Karl R. Popper, Realism and the Aim of Science(Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield, 1983).
  • Karl Gunnar Hammarlund, “Continuous Assessment of Historical Knowledge and Competence: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Possibilities”, David Ludvigsson and Alan Booth(ed.), Enriching History Teaching and Learning: Challenges, Possibilities, Practice: Proceedings of the Link ping Conference on History Teaching and Learning in Higher Education(Link ping: Link ping University, 2015), pp.33~49.
  • Karen M. Dutt Doner, Catherine Cook Cottone, and Susan Allen, “Improving Classroom Instruction: Understanding the Developmental Nature of Analyzing Primary Sources”, RMLE Online, Vol. 30(2007), pp.1~20.
  • Kadriye Ercikan and Peter Seixas, “Issues in Designing Assessments of Historical Thinking”, Theory Into Practice, Vol. 54(2015), pp.255~262.
  • Kadriye Ercikan and Peter Seixas(ed.), New Directions in Assessing Historical Thinking(New York: Routledge, 2015).
  • Juliette Lyons Thomas, “Using Think Aloud Protocols in the Validity Investigation of an Assessment of Complex Thinking”, PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, 2014.
  • Jukka Rantala, “How Finnish Adolescents Understand History: Disciplinary Thinking in History and Its Assessment Among 16-Year-Old Finns”, Education Sciences, Vol. 2(2012), pp.193~207.
  • Joyce O. Appleby, Lynn Hunt, and Margaret C. Jacob, Telling the Truth About History(New York: Norton, 1994).
  • Jose Medina, “In Defense of Pragmatic Contextualism: Wittgenstein and Dewey on Meaning and Agreement”, The Philosophical Forum, Vol.35(2004), pp.341~369.
  • Jor̈ n Rus̈ en, Studies in Metahistory(Pretoria : Human Sciences Research Council, 1993).
  • Jor̈ n Rus̈ en, History: Narration, Interpretation, Orientation(New York: Berghahn Books, 2006).
  • Jong-pil Yoon, “Was Emily Brown American Empress in Korea? The Limits and Meaning of Historical Inquiry as Seen Through Inferential Contextualism”, The Journal of the Philosophy of History(2016b), pp.1~22(DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341339).
  • Jong-pil Yoon, “Contextualizing Maurice Courant, Pioneer of Korean Studies in Europe”, Journal of Korean Studies, Vol. 21(2016a), pp.325~353.
  • Jong-pil Yoon, “A Japanese Egypt: Korea as Depicted by Early Twentieth-Century British Newspapers”, Acta Koreana, Vol. 19(2016c), pp.31~57.
  • Jong-pil Yoon and Hyun-sook Park, “An Unfamiliar Other within the Uncivilized Other: Korea as Depicted by Late Nineteenth-Century British Newspapers”, Korea Journal, Vol. 54(2014), pp.33~59.
  • Jonathan Friedman, “The Past in the Future: History and the Politics of Identity”, American Anthropologist, Vol. 94(1992), pp.837~859.
  • Jon M. Shepard, Sociology, Updated(Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2006).
  • John W. Bender(ed.), The Current State of the Coherence Theory(Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989).
  • John Symons and Paco Calvo(ed.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Psychology(London: Routledge, 2009).
  • John Losee, Theories of Scientific Progress: An Introduction(London: Routledge, 2004).
  • John I. Goodlad, A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future(New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1984).
  • John H. Flavell, “Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry”, American Psychologist, Vol. 34(1979), pp.906~911.
  • John H. Flavell et al., Cognitive Development(Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 2002).
  • John Fines and Ray Verrier, The Drama of History(London: New University Education, 1974).
  • John E. Wilz, “Did the United States Betray Korea in 1905?” Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 54(1985), pp.243~270.
  • John E. Towes, “Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and the Irreducibility of Experience”, American Historical Review, Vol. 92(1987), pp.879~907.
  • John Dewey, “Propositions, Warranted Assertibility, and Truth”, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 38(1941), pp.169~186.
  • John Dewey, The Quest for Certainty(New York: Minton, Balch, & Company, 1929).
  • John Dewey, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry(New York: H. Holt and Company, 1938).
  • John Dewey, Jo Ann Boydston(ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey, Volume 13(Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2008).
  • John Dewey, Experience and Nature(London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1929).
  • John Dewey, Essays in Experimental Logic(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1916).
  • John D. Bransford, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School(Washington: National Acad. Press, 2004).
  • John B. Moore, A Digest of International Law, Vol. 7(Washington: Govt. Print. Off., 1906).
  • Joel Westheimer, “What Kind of Citizen? The Politics of Educating for Democracy”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 41(2004), pp.237~269.
  • Joel Breakstone, “Try, Try, Try Again: The Process of Designing New History Assessments”, Theory & Research in Social Education, Vol. 42(2014), pp.453~485.
  • Joel Breakstone, Mark Smith, and Sam Wineburg, “Beyond the Bubble in History/Social Studies Assessments”, Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 94(2013), pp.53~57.
  • Jerzy Topolski, “Historical Narrative: Towards a Coherent Structure”, History and Theory, Vol. 26(1987), pp.75~86.
  • Jerry A. Fodor, “Pr cis of the Modularity of Mind”, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Vol. 8(1985), pp.1~42.
  • Jerome S. Bruner, The Process of Education(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999).
  • Jerome S. Bruner, Acts of Meaning(Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 2002).
  • Jennifer A. Livingston, “Metacognition: An Overview”, Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Buffalo, 2003.
  • Jeffery D. Nokes et al., “Teaching High School Students to Use Heuristics While Reading Historical Texts”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 99(2007), pp.492~504.
  • Jeannette Keim, Forty Years of German American Political Relations(Philadelphia, 1919).
  • Jean-Fran ois Rouet et al., “Studying and Using Multiple Documents in History: Effects of Discipline Expertise”, Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 1(1997), pp.85~106.
  • Jean-Fran ois Lyotard, La Condition Postmoderne(Paris: Les Ed́ itions de Minuit, 1979).
  • Jannet van Drie and Carla van Boxtel, “Historical Reasoning: Towards a Framework for Analyzing Students’ Reasoning about the Past”, Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 20(2008), pp.87~110.
  • James T. Kloppenberg, “Pragmatism: An Old Name for Some New Ways of Thinking?” The Journal of American History, Vol. 83(1996), pp.100~138.
  • James T. Kloppenberg, “Pragmatism and the Practice of History: From Turner and DuBois to Today”, Metaphilosophy, Vol. 35(2004), pp.202~225.
  • James T. Kloppenberg, “Objectivity and Historicism: A Century of American Historical Writing”, The American Historical Review, Vol. 94(1989), pp.1011~1030.
  • Jakub Lorenc, Krzysztof Mrozowski, Aleksandra Oniszczuk, Jacek Staniszewski, and Klaudia Starczynowska, “How Is Chronological Thinking Tested?”, Edukacja: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Vol. 1(2013), pp.84~97.
  • Jaegwon Kim, Philosophy of Mind(Boulder: Westview Press, 2011).
  • Jacque Derrida, Positions(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981).
  • Jacki Watts, Kate Cockcroft, and Norman Duncan, Developmental Psychology(Cape Town: Juta, 2009).
  • J. Nicole(ed.), Developments in History Teaching(Exeter: University of Exeter, 1980).
  • J rn Rusen, “Theory of History in the Development ̈ of West German Historical Studies”, German Studies Review, Vol. 7(1984), pp.11~25.
  • J rn Rusen, “Some Theoretical Approaches to Intercultural Comparative Historiography”, History and Theory, Vol. 35(1996), pp.5~22.
  • J rn R sen and Bill Templer, “Historical Enlightenment in the Light of Postmodernism: History in the Age of the ‘New Unintelligibility’”, History and Memory, Vol. 1(1989), pp.109~131.
  • J rgen Straub(ed.), Narration, Identity, and Historical Consciousness(New York: Berghahn Books, 2005).
  • Ira Shor, Culture Wars: School and Society in the Conservative Restoration, 1969-1984(Boston: Routledge & K. Paul, 1986).
  • Horace N. Allen, Things Korean: A Collection of Sketches and Anecdotes, Missionary and Diplomatic(New York: F.H. Revell, 1908).
  • Hilary Putnam, Meaning and the Moral Sciences(Boston: Routledge & K. Paul, 1978).
  • Hilary Cooper, The Teaching of History(London: David Fulton, 1992).
  • Hilary Bourdillon(ed.), Teaching History(London: Routledge, 1994).
  • Herman J. Saatkamp, Jr.(ed.), Rorty & Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to His Critics(Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1995).
  • Helle Bjerg, Claudia Lenz, Erik Thorstensen(ed.), Historicizing the Uses of the Past Scandinavian Perspectives on History Culture, Historical Consciousness and Didactics of History Related to World War II(Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011).
  • Hayden White, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014).
  • Ginney P. Wright and Jason L. Endacott, “Historical Inquiry and the Limitations of the Common Core State Standards”, The Journal of Social Studies Research, Vol. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.07.003i.
  • Gilbert Ryle, Collected Papers Volume 1: Critical Essays(London: Routledge, 2009).
  • Geraint Brown and Sally Burnham, “Assessment after Levels”, Teaching History, Vol. 157(2014), pp.8~17.
  • George Pappas(ed.), Justification and Knowledge(Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co., 1979).
  • George B. Palermo and Richard N. Kocsis, Offender Profiling: An Introduction to the Sociopsychological Analysis of Violent Crime(Springfield: Thomas, 2005).
  • Geoffrey Scheurman, “From Behaviorist to Constructivist Teaching”, Social Education, Vol. 62(1998), pp6~9.
  • Geoffrey Scheurman and Keith Reynolds, “The ‘History Problem’ in Curricular Reform”, Barbara Slater Stern(ed.), The New Social Studies: People, Projects, and Perspectives(Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, 2010), pp.341~357.
  • Frederick D. Drake and Sarah Drake Brown, “A Systematic Approach to Improve Students' Historical Thinking”, The History Teacher, Vol. 36(2003), pp.465~489.
  • Frederick A. McKenzie, Korea’s Fight for Freedom(New York: Chicago F. H. Revell Co., 1919).
  • Frank Jackson & Michael Smith(ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
  • Frank Ankersmit, “Invitation to Historians”, Rethinking History, Vol. 7(2003), pp.413~437.
  • Frank Ankersmit, Narrative Logic: A Semantic Analysis of the Historian’s Language(Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1983).
  • Frank Ankersmit, Historical representation(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001).
  • Ferdinand de Saussure, Course in General Linguistics(Chicago: Open Court, 1986).
  • Ernest Sosa, Epistemology(Princeton University Press, 2017).
  • Elisabeth Pickles, “Assessment of Students’ Uses of Evidence: Shifting the Focus from Processes to Historical Reasoning”, Teaching History, Vol.143(2011), pp.52~59.
  • Edwin R. Gerler, Handbook of School Violence(New York: Haworth Reference Press, 2004).
  • Edward S. Mihalkanin, American Statesmen: Secretaries of State from John Jay to Colin Powell(Westport: Greenwood Press, 2004).
  • Edmund L. Gettier, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis, Vol. 23(1963), pp.121~123.
  • E.D. Hirsh, Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know(Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987).
  • Duncan Pritchard, “Recent Work on Radical Skepticism”, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 39(2002), pp.215~257.
  • Duncan Pritchard, Epistemology(New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).
  • Douglas McDermid, The Varieties of Pragmatism: Truth, Realism, and Knowledge from James to Rorty(New York: Continuum, 2006).
  • Douglas J. Hacker et al., Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice(New York: Routledge, 1998).
  • Dominick LaCapra, Soundings in Critical Theory(Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).
  • Diane Ravitch, “Decline and Fall of Teaching History”, New York Times, Nov. 17, 1985.
  • Denis Shemilt, History 13-16 Evaluation Study (Glasgow: Holmes McDougall, 1980).
  • Deborah Henderson, “A Situated Approach to Historical Thinking in the Australian Curriculum: History”, Agora, Vol. 47(2012), pp.4~11.
  • David M. Pletcher, The Diplomacy of Involvement: American Economic Expansion Across the Pacific(Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2001).
  • David L. Hildebrand, “Pragmatic Objectivity in History, Journalism and Philosophy(Presidential Address)”, Southwest Philosophy Review, Vol. 27(2011), pp.1~20.
  • David Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature”, American Historical Review, Vol. 94(1989), pp.581~609.
  • David H. Jonassen(ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology(New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 1996).
  • David Gerwin, “What Lies Beyond the Bubble? Trying Out One of the Stanford History Education Group's New History Assessments”, The Social Studies, Vol. 105(2014), pp.266~273.
  • David Carr, “Review: History as Orientation: R sen on Historical Culture and Narration: Geschichte im Kulturproze by J rn R sen”, History and Theory, Vol. 45(2006), pp.229~243.
  • David Boucher, Texts in Context: Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas(Dordrecht: Springer, 1985).
  • Daniel J. Meier, “The Use of Primary Source Historical Documents, Historical Reasoning Heuristics, and the Subsequent Development of Historical Empathy”, Doctoral diss. Temple University, 2009.
  • Daisy Martin and Sam Wineburg, “Seeing Thinking on the Web”, The History Teacher, Vol. 41(2008), pp.305~319.
  • D. Royce Sadler, “Interpretations of Criteria-Based Assessment and Grading in Higher Education”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 30(2005), pp.175~194.
  • Conn Greenwich, Radical Reformers: The Influence of the Left in American Education(Information Age Pub., 2004).
  • Colin Koopman, “Historicism in Pragmatism: Lessons in Historiography and Philosophy”, Metaphilosophy, Vol. 41(2009), pp.690~713.
  • Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays(New York: BasicBooks, 1973).
  • Christopher Spivey, “History and Social Studies in America”, The History Teacher, Vol. 4(1971), pp.20~21.
  • Christopher Portal, “Empathy”, Teaching History, Vol. 58(1990), pp.36~38.
  • Christopher Portal(ed.), The History Curriculum for Teachers(London: The Falmer Press, 1987).
  • Christopher Hitchcock(ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science(Malden: Blackwell, 2004).
  • Christine Baron, “Understanding Historical Thinking at Historic Sites”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 104(2012), pp.833~847.
  • Christina Doyle, Final Report to National Forum on Information Literacy(Washington: ERIC Clearinghouse, 1992).
  • Chris Husbands et al., Understanding History Teaching: Teaching and Learning about the Past in Secondary Schools (Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International, 2003).
  • Cheryl Misak, Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation(London: Routledge, 2002).
  • Chauncey Monte-Sano and Susan De La Paz, “Using Writing Tasks to Elicit Adolescents’ Historical Reasoning”, Journal of Literacy Research, Vol. 44(2012), pp.273~299.
  • Charles S. Sanders, Collected Papers, Vol. 1(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974).
  • Charles I. Bevans(ed.), Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States of America, 1776-1949, Vol. 9(Washington, D. C.: Dept. of State, 1972).
  • Charles E. Samec, “Teaching for Historical Understanding in British Schools”, The History Teacher, Vol. 13(1973), pp.61~69.
  • Charles Anderson et al., “Engaging with Historical Source Work”, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, Vol. 5(2006), pp.243~263.
  • Catherine A. Faver, “School-Based Humane Education as a Strategy to Prevent Violence: Review and Recommendations”, Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 32(2010), pp.365~370.
  • Carla van Boxtel and Jannet van Drie, ““That’s in the Time of the Romans!” Knowledge and Strategies Students Use to Contextualize Historical Images and Documents”, Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 30(2012), pp.113~145.
  • Carla Peck and Peter Seixas, “Benchmarks of Historical Thinking: First Steps”, Canadian Journal of Education, Vol. 31(2008), pp.1015~1038.
  • Carl Becker, “Every man His Own Historian”, The American Historical Review, Vol. 37(1932), pp.221~236.
  • C. Behan McCullagh, “Review of F. R. Ankersmit, Narrative Logic: A Semantic Analysis of the Historian’s Language”, History and Theory, Vol. 23(1984), pp.394~403.
  • C. Behan McCullagh, The Truth of History(London : Routledge, 2009), p.46.
  • Burton Y. Pines, Back to Basics: The Traditionalist Movement That Is Sweeping Grass-Roots America(New York: Morrow, 1982).
  • Bruce Vansledright, “What Does It Mean to Think Historically … and How Do You Teach It?” Social Education, Vol. 68(2004), pp.230~233.
  • Bruce VanSledright, The Challenge of Rethinking History Education: On Practices, Theories, and Policy(New York: Routledge, 2010).
  • Bruce VanSledright, In Search of America’s Past: Learning to Read History in Elementary School(New York: Teachers College Press, 2002).
  • Bruce VanSledright, Assessing Historical Thinking and Understanding: Innovative Designs for New Standards(New York: Routledge, 2013).
  • Bruce VanSledright and Christine Kelly, “Reading American History: The Influence of Using Multiple Sources on Six Fifth Graders”, The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 98(1998), pp.239~265.
  • Bruce VanSledright and Christine Kelly, “Reading American History: How Do Multiple Text Sources Influence Historical Learning in Fifth Grade?” Reading Research Report, Vol. 68(1996), pp.1~38.
  • Brian Walker, Dancing to History’s Tune: History, Myth, and Politics in Ireland(Belfast, Northern Ireland: Queen’s University, Institute of Irish Studies, 1996).
  • Brad Burenheide, “I Can Do This: Revelations on Teaching With Historical Thinking”, History Teacher, Vol. 41(2007), pp.55~61.
  • Bodon von Borries, “Concepts of Historical Thinking and Historical Learning in the Perspective”, International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 27(1997), pp.211~220.
  • Bill Tally and Lauren B. Goldenberg, “Fostering Historical Thinking With Digitized Primary Sources”, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol. 38(2005), pp.1~21.
  • Bernard Bailyn, On the Teaching and Writing of History: Responses to a Series of Questions(Hanover: Montgomery Endowment, Dartmouth College, 1994).
  • Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals(New York: David McKay Company, 1956).
  • Barbara L. McCombs and Jo Sue Whisler, The Learner-Centered Classroom and School (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997).
  • Barbara Bickart and Robert M. Schindler, “Internet Forums as Influential Sources of Consumer Information”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol.15(2001), pp.31~40.
  • B. C. Koh, “Review: Korea and the United States: A Century of Cooperation”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 80(1986), pp.1068~1069.
  • Ayten flažoglu and Erin aydaş, “An assessment of 4th and 7th Grade Social Studies Instruction in Terms of Historical Thinking”, Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 10(2005), pp.17~43.
  • Avishag Reisman, “Reading Like a Historian: A Document-Based History Curriculum Intervention in Urban High Schools”, Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 30(2012), pp.86~112.
  • Arthur N. Applebee, Judith A. Langer, and Ina V. S. Mullis, The Nation’s Report Card: Literature and U.S. History(Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1987).
  • Arthur G. Powell, Eleanor Farrar, and David K. Cohen, The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers in the Educational Marketplace(Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1985).
  • Arthur Chapman, “‘Reading P.J. Rogers’: The New History 30 Years On”, International Journal of Historical Learning Teaching and Research, Vol. 9(2010), pp.50~62.
  • Anthony M. Pellegrino, “The Manifestation of Critical Thinking and Metacognition in Secondary American History Students through the Implementation of Lesson Plans and Activities Consistent with Historical Thinking Skills”, Doctoral diss., Florida State University, 2007.
  • Angela Bermudez, “Four Tools for Critical Inquiry in History, Social Studies and Civic Education”, Revista de Estudios Sociales, Vol. 52(2015), pp.102~118.
  • Amber Walraven et al., “Information-Problem Solving: A Review of Problems Students Encounter and Instructional Solutions”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24(2008), pp.623~648.
  • Alun Munslow, Deconstructing History(London: Routledge, 2001).
  • Alun Munslow and Robert A. Rosenstone(ed.), Experimenting in Rethinking History(New York: Routledge, 2004).
  • Allan Megill, “J rn Rus̈ en’s Theory of Historiography: Between Modernism and Rhetoric of Inquiry”, History and Theory, Vol. 31(1994), pp.39~60.
  • Alfred E. J. Cavendish and Henry E. F. Goold-Adams, Korea and the Sacred White Mountain(London: G. Philip &Son, 1894).
  • Alaric K. Dickinson, Peter Lee, and Peter Rogers(ed.), Learning History(London: Heinemann, 1984).
  • Alaric K. Dickinson and Peter Lee(ed.), History Teaching and Historical Understanding(London: Heinemann, 1978).
  • Alan W. Brownsword, “Doing History: A Skills Approach”, The History Teacher, Vol. 6(1973), pp.251~266.
  • Alan Sears and Ian Wright(ed.), Challenges and Prospects for Canadian Social Studies(Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press, 2004).
  • Aaron M. Pallas, “Preparing Education Doctoral Students for Epistemological Diversity”, Education Researcher, Vol. 30(2001), pp.1~6.
  • 20세기 미국의 역사교육론의 동향
    趙承來 『학생생활연구』11, , pp.105~117 [1989]