박사

우위안 강도의 정량적 측정과 우위안의 시기능 특성에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Quantitative Measurement of the Degree of Eye Dominance and Visual Function of the Dominant Eye

정수아 2017년
논문상세정보
' 우위안 강도의 정량적 측정과 우위안의 시기능 특성에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Quantitative Measurement of the Degree of Eye Dominance and Visual Function of the Dominant Eye' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • Degree of eye dominance
  • Dominant eye test
  • Visual function
  • dominanteye
  • non dominant eye
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
50 0

0.0%

' 우위안 강도의 정량적 측정과 우위안의 시기능 특성에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Quantitative Measurement of the Degree of Eye Dominance and Visual Function of the Dominant Eye' 의 참고문헌

  • Sung PJ. Optometry, 8th Ed. Seoul: Daihakseolim, 2013,141-298.
  • Shim MS, Shim HS, Kim YC. Comparison of dynamic stereoacuity according to dominant eye and degree of dominant eye. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2016,21(4):227-233.
  • Shim JB, Joo SH, Shim HS. The direction and level of dominant eye accoding to the tests. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2015,20(3) :363-368.
  • Shields MB. The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980,24(4):211-219.
  • Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical management of binocular vision: heterophoric, accommodative, and eye movement disorders, 2nd Ed. Philadelphia:LWW, 2002,17-180.
  • Robison SE, Block SS, Boudreaux JD, Flora RJ. Hand-eye dominance in a population with mental handicaps: prevalence and a comparison of methods. J Am Optom Assoc. 1999,70(9):563-70.
  • Park JH. A study on reading improvement using color filter lens. MA Thesis. Dongshin University, Jeollanam-do. 2011,9-16.
  • Park HJ, Yoo KC, Kim JM. The study on the dominant eye tests and application. Korean J Vis Sci. 2000,2(2):161-167.
  • Park HJ, Yoo KC, Kim JM. The relationship between dominant eye and visual functions. Korean J Vis Sci. 2000,2(1):25-32.
  • Oh JY. Effect of uncorrected astigmatism less than 1.00 diopter on visual function. MA Thesis. Konyang University, Daejeon. 2017,1-145.
  • Nitta M, Shimizu K, Niida T. The influence of ocular dominance on monovision--the influence of strength of ocular dominance on visual functions. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2007,111(6):435-440.
  • Nam SK. The Effect of breath alcohol concentration on visual function. MA Thesis. Konyang University, Daejeon. 2014,1-94.
  • Min JY. Study on the visual function and satisfaction after monovision surgery in presbyopes. MA Thesis. Eulji University, Daejeon. 2016,1-2.
  • Lin SY, White GE. Mandibular position and head posture as a function of eye dominance. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 1996,20(2):133-140.
  • Leem HS, Wi DG, Joo SH. The relationship of dominant eyes and fixing eyes in binocular anomalies. Korean J Vis Sci. 2010,12(3): 173-179.
  • Lee WS, Ye KH, An SJ, Shin BJ. The comparative research of dominant eye and non-dominant eye by age. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2013,18(2):203-211.
  • Lee MS, Cho KJ, Cho HW, Kyung SE, Chan MH. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc parameters in dominant compared with non-dominant eyes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2013,54(5):784-788.
  • Lee HJ. The influence of accommodation of eye on ametropic dominant eye. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 1997,2(1):149-154.
  • Lee HJ, Kim CS. The study of corrected lens and dominant eye in elementary school. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2003,8(2):53-56.
  • Lee H, Lee KO. Prevalence of general binocular dysfunctions in population of college students. Korean J Vis Sci. 2004:6(1),77-85.
  • Lee DY. Effect of uncorrected astigmatism less than 1.00 diopter on visual function. MA Thesis. Konyang University, Daejeon. 2016,1-145.
  • Kim MH. Studies on the normal visual field of koreans. MA Thesis. Ewha Womans University, Seoul. 1982,1-30.
  • Kim JK, Pak DW. Visual function test and analysis. Shinkwang Pub, 1996,39-40.
  • Kim HS, Kim HM, Seong GJ, Yu YS et al. Ophthalmology, 10th Ed. Seoul: Ilchokak, 2014,76.
  • Kim HK, Cho KJ. The angle kappa in dominant and non-dominant eye. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2015,56(4):494-498.
  • Kim CS. The measurement of intraocular pressure in old aged rural residents. Korean J Vis Sci. 2002,4(1):29-34.
  • Kim CJ. The effects of functional progressive addition lenses on binoccular vision. MA Thesis. Konyang University, Daejeon. 2010,11.
  • Kawata H, Ohsuka K. Dynamic asymmetries in convergence eye movements under natural viewing conditions. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology. 2001:45(5),437-444.
  • Jung SA. Change of stereopsis by induced aniseikonia in emmetropia. MA Thesis. Konyang University, Daejeon. 2013,1-161.
  • Jung SA, Nam SK, Kim HJ. The effects of breath alcohol concentration increase on visual field and readable visual field. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2016,21(2):153-158.
  • Johansson J, Seimyr GO, Pansell T. Eye dominance in binocular viewing conditions. Journal of vision. 2015,15(9):21.
  • Jeon IC, Kim HJ, Kim SC, Mah KC, Clinical binocular vision test, 1st Ed. Seoul: Fasionmiel, 2012,7
  • Ibi K. Characteristics of dynamic accommodation responses: comparison between the dominant and non-dominant eyes. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 1997,17(1):44-54.
  • Han Y, Seideman M, Lennerstrand G.Dynamics of accommodative vergence movements controlled by the dominant and non-dominant eye. Acta Ophthalmologica. 1995,73(4):319-324.
  • Dictionary of visual science, 1st Ed. Seoul: Daihakseolim, 1994,258.
  • Coren S. Sensorimotor performance as a function of eye dominance and handedness. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1999,88(2):424-426.
  • Cho KJ, Kim SY, Yang SW. The refractive errors of dominant and non-dominant eyes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009,50(2): 275-279.
  • Cheng CY, Yen MY, Lin HY, Hsia WW, Hsu WM. Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004,45(8):2856-2860.
  • American optometry association. Home study course for optometric assisting, 1st Ed. Massachusetts: Butterworth -Heinemann, 1989:132-133.