박사

문화소비와 사회연결망 : 의사소통효과 관점에서

권경은 2017년
논문상세정보
    • 저자 권경은
    • 기타서명 How cultural consumption and communication maintain social relationship
    • 형태사항 삽화: 26 cm: vi, 127 p.
    • 일반주기 참고문헌 수록
    • 학위논문사항 학위논문(박사)-, 언론정보학과, 서울대학교 대학원, 2017. 2
    • DDC 070, 22
    • 발행지 서울
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2017
    • 발행사항 서울대학교 대학원
    유사주제 논문( 125)
' 문화소비와 사회연결망 : 의사소통효과 관점에서' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 뉴매체,잡지,출판
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
98 0

0.0%

' 문화소비와 사회연결망 : 의사소통효과 관점에서' 의 참고문헌

  • 회전문관객을 말하다
    이기원 『뉴스테이지 』, 201605. http://www.newstage.co.kr/news/view.html?page=3§io n=79&category=95&no=22354에서 검색 [2016]
  • 한국인의 문화적 경계와 문화적 위계구조
    구자숙 신동엽 한신갑 한준 『문화와 사회』, 2호, 29–53 [2006]
  • 한국 중 하위계층의 고급예술 소비 연구
    김은미 신동엽 이중식 정영찬 『예술경영연구』, 30호, 219–242 [2014]
  • 포괄적 대인 의사소통 능력 척도개발 및 타당성 검증
    허경호 『한국언론학보』, 47권 6호, 380–408 [2003]
  • 텔레비전과 사회자본
    김은미 조성동 『한국언론학보』, 56권 1호, 105-131 [2012]
  • 텔레비전 시청과 온라인 대화의 결합 : “사회적 시청” 개념 제시와 효과 검증
    최윤정 『한국방송학보』, 28권 4호, 315–355 [2014]
  • 컨버전스 환경의 미디어다중이용행위 연구
    이혜미 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문 [2014]
  • 취향, 교양, 문화 – 사회학주의를 넘어서
    이상길 『문학과 사회』, 27권 2호, 242-260 [2014]
  • 어린이 집단의 미디어 이용과 사회적 관계
    박소라 배영 『한국방송학보』, 19권 4호, 307–350 [2004]
  • 소셜 네트워크 서비스의 이용동기와 성과에 대한 실증연구: 온라인에서의 정체성 표현욕구의 매개효과를 중심으로
    구철모 전유희 정남호 한국경영정보학회 학술대회, 48-54 [2011]
  • 상호작용 행위를 통해 본 “온라인 호모필리” : 페이스북 “친구” 관계의 친밀도에 대한 연구
    위지은 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2013]
  • 사회적 의사소통 성향과 매스미디어 이용
    김은미 『언론과 사회』, 10권 4호, 121–151 [2002]
  • 사회자본과 행정: 사회자본 이론의 논점과 연구경향
    박희봉 『정부학연구』, 8권 1호, 5-45 [2002]
  • 사회자본과 의사소통 품질
    김은미 문태준 이준웅 『사이버의사소통 학보』, 19호, 135–173 [2006]
  • 사회자본 형성의 의사소통 기초: 대중 매체 이용이 신뢰, 사회적 연계망 활동 및 사회정치적 참여에 미치는 영향
    김은미 문태준 이준웅 『한국언론학보』, 49권 3호, 234–261 [2005]
  • 문화취향이 정보 불평등에 미치는 영향
    서우석 이호영 『정보화정책』, 13권 3호, 197–218 [2006]
  • 문화적 취향의 분화와 계급: 음악장르를 중심으로
    양종회 『한국사회학』, 43권 5호, 170–209 [2009]
  • 문화자본과 영화선호의 다양성
    이호영 장미혜 『한국사회학』, 42권 1호, 62–95 [2008]
  • 문화자본과 소비양식의 차이
    장미혜 『한국사회학』, 35권 3호, 51–81 [2001]
  • 문화 소비자본이 문화 예술상품 수요에 미치는 효과에 관한 연구
    성제환 『문화경제연구』, 15권 1호, 67-93 [2012]
  • 면대면 의사소통 환경이 새로운 대인의사소통 매체 이용에 미치는 영향
    배진한 『한국언론정보학보』, 23호, 47–79 [2003]
  • 대중 매체 이용이 사회자본에 영향을 미치는 경로 분석: 대인간 의사소통 매개 모델 검증
    최윤정 『한국언론학보』, 52권 3호, 374–395 [2008]
  • 네트워크화된 문화소비자와 문화자본
    서우석 이호영 『사이버의사소통학보』, 27권 1호, 93–137 [2010]
  • 구별짓기의 한국적 문법
    박근영 한신갑 『한국사회학』, 41권 2호, 211-239 [2007]
  • 공연예술계 온라인 문화매개자의 등장과 변화
    권경은 김은미 『언론정보연구』, 49권 2호, 74–114 [2012]
  • 박사
    『한국인의 문화행사 관람 유형과 사회적 지위』
    김선형 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문 [2009]
  • 『인터넷이용실태조사』
    이민영 이정환 임재명 장세정 한국인터넷진흥원 [2015]
  • 『관계적 인간의 형성』
    김반야 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문 [2015]
  • 「한국사회에 문화자본은 존재하는가?」
    최샛별 『문화와 사회』, 123–158 [2006]
  • Yoo, W., Namkoong, K., Choi, M., Shah, D. V., Tsang, S., Hong, Y. & Gustafson, D. H. (2014). Giving and receiving emotional support online: Communication competence as a moderator of psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 13-22.
  • Wright, D. (2011). Making Tastes for everything: Omnivorousness and cultural abundance. Journal for Cultural Research, 15(4), 355–371.
  • Worthy, M., Gary, A. L., & Kahn, G. M. (1969). Self-disclosure as an exchange process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(1), 59–63.
  • Wood, A. F., & Smith, M. J. (2001). Online communication: Linking technology. Identity, and Culture, Mahwah, NJ: Lowrence Erlbaum Associates,.
  • Williams, B. A., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2011). After Broadcast News: Media Regimes, Democracy, and the New Information Environment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wells, A., & Hakanen, E. A. (1991). The emotional use of popular music by adolescents. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 68(3), 445–454.
  • Wellman, B. (2001). Computer networks as social networks. Science, 293(5537), 2031–2034.
  • Warde, A., & Tampubolon, G. (2008). Social capital, networks and leisure consumption. The Sociological Review, 50(2), 155–180.
  • Warde, A., & Tampubolon, G. (2002). Social capital, networks and leisure consumption. The Sociological Review, 50(2), 155-180.
  • Warde, A., & Gayo-Cal, M. (2009). The anatomy of cultural omnivorousness: The case of the United Kingdom. Poetics, 37(2), 119–145.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaciton. Communication Research, 23, 3–43.
  • WACS Insights & Strategy (2010, Feb 23). Research on Trends: Influentials, Innovators & Early Adopters. Retrived from https://www.greenbook.org/marketing-research/influentialsinnovators- early-adopters.
  • Verboord, M. (2013). The impact of peer-produced criticism on cultural evaluation: A multilevel analysis of discourse employment in online and offline film reviews. New media & society, 16(6), 921-940.
  • Vaisey, S., & Lizardo, O. (2010). Can cultural worldviews influence network composition?. Social Forces, 88(4), 1595-1618.
  • Tramonte, L., & Willms, J. D. (2010). Cultural capital and its effects on education outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 200–213.
  • Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a Time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348.
  • Thelwall, M. (2009). Homophily in MySpace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 219–231.
  • Tepper, S. J., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Pathways to music exploration in a digital age. Poetics, 37(3), 227–249.
  • Sullivan, O., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2007). The omnivore thesis revisited: Voracious cultural consumers. European Sociological Review, 23(2), 123-137.
  • Spitzberg, B. H. (1983). Communication competence as knowledge, skill, and impression. Communication Education, 32(3), 323- 329.
  • Spigel, L. (1992). Make room for TV: television and the family ideal in postwar America. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.
  • Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Lee, N. (2009). Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: Processes of socialization into citizenship. Political Communication, 26(1), 102–117.
  • Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145–168.
  • Scannell, P. (1989). Public service broadcasting and modern public life. Media, Culture & Society, 11(2), 135–166.
  • Rubin, R. B., & Rubin, A. M. (1992). Antecedents of interpersonal communication motivation. Communication Quarterly, 40(3), 305–317.
  • Rubin, A. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1985). Interface of personal and mediated communication: A research agenda. Critical Studies in Media Communication, (1), 36-53.
  • Rubin, A. M. (1983). Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations. Journal of Broadcasting, 27(1), 37–51.
  • Roth, F. S., Weinmann, C., Schneider, F. M., Hopp, F. R., & Vorderer, P. (2014). Seriously entertained: Antecedents and consequences of hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experiences with political talk shows on TV. Mass Communication and Society, 17(3), 379–399.
  • Roscigno, V. J., & Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W. (1999). Race, cultural capital, and educational resources: Persistent inequalities and achievement returns. Sociology of Education, 72(3), 158–178.
  • Roose, H., & Stichele, A. V. (2010). Living room Vs . concert hall : Patterns of music consumption in Flanders. Social Forces, 89(September), 185–207.
  • Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 649.
  • Reinecke, L., Vorderer, P., & Knop, K. (2014). Entertainment 2.0? The role of intrinsic and extrinsic need satisfaction for the enjoyment of Facebook use. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 417–438
  • Reid, D. J., & Reid, F. J. M. (2007). Text or talk? Social anxiety, loneliness, and divergent preferences for cell phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 424–435.
  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA.: Cambridge University Press and CSLI Publications.
  • Ratneshwar, S., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Comprehension's role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 52-62.
  • Ramirez, A., Walther, J. B., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computermediated communication. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 213–228.
  • Radbourne, J., Johanson, K., Glow, H., & White, T. (2009). The audience experience: Measuring quality in the performing arts. International Journal of Arts Management, 16-29.
  • Putnam, R. D.(1995), Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York, NY: Simon Schuster.
  • Peterson, R., & Kern, R. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 900– 907.
  • Peterson, R. A. (1983). Patterns of cultural choice: A prolegomenon. American Behavioral Scientist, 26(4), 422-438.
  • Ostrower, F. (1998). The arts as cultural capital among elites: Bourdieu’s theory reconsidered. Poetics, 26(1), 43–53.
  • Norris, P. (1996). Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. Political Science & Politics, 29(03), 474-480.
  • Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Ttransformation of Media Audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 838-855.
  • MTM London(2010). Digital audiences: Engagement with arts and culture online. London: MTM London.
  • Lizardo, O., & Skiles, S. (2008). Cultural consumption in the fine and popular arts realms. Sociology Compass, 2, 485–502.
  • Lizardo, O. (2013). Variety in cultural choice and the activation of social ties. Social Science Research, 42(2), 321–330.
  • Lizardo, O. (2011). Cultural correlates of ego-network closure. Sociological Perspectives, 54(3), 479–487.
  • Lizardo, O. (2006). How cultural tastes shape personal networks. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 778-807.
  • Litman, B. R., & Kohl, L. S. (1992). Network rerun viewing in the age of new programming services. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 69(2), 383-391.
  • Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8(4), 365-385.
  • Licoppe, C., & Smoreda, Z. (2005). Are social networks technologically embedded?: How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology. Social Networks, 27(4), 317-335.
  • Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., & Christakis, N. (2008). Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30(4), 330–342.
  • Lewis, G.(1980). Taste Culture and their composition: Towards a new theoretical perspective. In E. Katz & T. Szecsko(Eds.), Mass Media and Social Change. New York, NY: Sage.
  • Levy, M. R., & Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications a conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11(1), 51-78.
  • Lemish, D. (1985). Soap opera viewing in college: A naturalistic inquiry. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 29(3), 275–293.
  • Ledbetter, A. M. (2009). Measuring online communication attitude: Instrument development and validation. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 463–486.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18(1), 18–66.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. (1947). Audience research in the movie field. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 254, 160–168.
  • Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32(5-6), 567-606.
  • Lareau, A., & Horvat, E. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 37.
  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
  • Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73.
  • Lanham, R. A. (2006). The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. Chicago, Il : University of Chicago Press.
  • Lamont, M., & Lareau, A. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 153–168.
  • Lamont, M. (1992). Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • L pez-Sintas, J., Garcia-Alvarez, M. E., & Filimon, N. (2008). Scale and periodicities of recorded music consumption. The Sociological Review, 56(1), 78–101.
  • L pez-Sintas, J., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2005). From exclusive to inclusive elitists and further: Twenty years of omnivorousness and cultural diversity in arts participation in the USA. Poetics, 33(5), 299–319.
  • Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.
  • Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, J. M. (1990). Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information-processing strategies. Mass communication and political information processing, 69-83.
  • Klinger, B. (2006). Beyond the multiplex: Cinema, new technologies, and the home. Oakland, CA: Univ of California Press.
  • Kendall, P. L., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1950). Problems of survey analysis. Continuities in Social Research, 133-196.
  • Katz-Gerro, T. (1999). Cultural consumption and social stratification: Leisure activities, musical tastes, and social location. Sociological Perspectives, 42(4), 627–646.
  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where old and new media collide, New York: New York University Press
  • Jenkins, H. (2004). The cultural logic of media convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(1), 10.
  • Jeannotte, M. S. (2003). Singing alone? The contribution of cultural capital to social cohesion and sustainable communities. The International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9(1), 35-49.
  • J ger, M. M. (2009). Equal access but unequal outcomes: Cultural capital and educational choice in a meritocratic society. Social Forces, 87(4), 1943-1971.
  • Holt, D. B. (1997). Distinction in America? recovering Bourdieu’s theory of taste from its critics. Poetics, 25, 93-120.
  • Holt, D. B. (1995). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices. Journal of consumer research, 22(1), 1-16.
  • Heeter, C. (2000). Interactivity in the context of designed Experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1), 3–14.
  • Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, H. (2002). The Internet in Everyday Life, 1-41.
  • Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society, 8(2), 125-147.
  • Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and coviewing with YouTube: blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 317–335.
  • Haridakis, P. M. (2002). Viewer Characteristics, Exposure to Television Violence, and Aggression. Media Psychology, 4(4), 323–352.
  • Hargittai, E. & Walejko, G.(2008). “The Participation Divide: Content Creation and Sharing in the Digital Age, Information, Communication & Society, 11(2): 239-256.
  • Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and nonusers of social network sites. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 13(1), 276-297.
  • Hallet, T. (2003). Symbolic power and organizational culture. Sociological Theory, 21(2), 128–149.
  • Griswold, W., & Wright, N. (2004). Wired and well read. In S. Jones & P. N. Howard(Eds.), Society Online: The Internet in Context (pp. 203–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Griswold, W. (2012). Cultures and Societies in a Changing World. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Granovetter, M. S.(1973), The strength of weak ties, American journal of sociology, 1360-1380
  • Godlewski, L. R., & Perse, E. M. (2010). Audience activity and reality television: Identification, online activity, and satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, 58(2), 148–169.
  • Giddens, A. (1990). Anthony Giddens: Consensus and Controversy, London: Falmer Press. 297-315.
  • Gans, H. (1999). Popular Culture and High culture: An Analysis and Evaluation of Taste. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Friemel, T. N. (2012). Network dynamics of television use in school classes. Social Networks, 34(3), 346–358.
  • Friemel, T. N. (2011). Dynamics of social networks. Procedia108 Social and Behavioral Sciences, 22, 2-3.
  • Fiske, J. (2002). Television Culture. London: Routledge.
  • Farkas, G., Grobe, R. P., Sheehan, D., & Shuan, Y. (1990). Cultural resources and school success: gender, ethnicity, and poverty groups within an urban school district. American Sociological Review, 55(1), 127–142.
  • Erickson, B. H. (1996). Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 217–251.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Social capital and college students’use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143~1168.
  • Edelmann, A., & Vaisey, S. (2014). Cultural resources and cultural distinction in networks. Poetics, 46, 22-37.
  • Dumais, S. A. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 44–68.
  • Duck, S. W., & Craig, G. (1978). Personality similarity and the development of friendship: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(3), 237-242.
  • Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1979). The World of Goods. New York, NY: Basic.
  • Dobrow, J. R. (1990). The rerun ritual: using VCRs to re-view. Social and Cultural Aspects of VCR Use, 181-193.
  • DiMaggio, P., & Ostrower, F. (1990). Participation in the arts by black and white Americans. Social Forces, 68(3), 753-778.
  • DiMaggio, P., & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1231–1261.
  • DiMaggio, P. (1987). Classification in art. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 440-55.
  • DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47(2), 189–201.
  • Coulangeon, P., & Lemel, Y. (2007). Is ‘distinction’really outdated? Questioning the meaning of the omnivorization of musical taste in contemporary France. Poetics, 35(2), 93-111.
  • Cote, R. R., & Erickson, B. H. (2009). Untangling the roots of tolerance how forms of social capital shape attitudes toward ethnic minorities and immigrants. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(12), 1664-1689.
  • Collins, R. (1988). Theoretical Sociology. San Francisco, CA: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovitch. Davis,
  • Cheung, S. Y., & Andersen, R. (2003). Time to read: family resources and educational outcomes in Britain. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 413–433.
  • Caves, R. (2000). Creative Industries: Contract Between Art and Commerce. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cappella, J. N., Kim, H. S., & Albarrac n, D. (2015). Selection and transmission processes for information in the emerging media environment: Psychological motives and message characteristics. Media Psychology, 18(3), 396-424.
  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and Closure. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2013). YouTube: Online video and Participatory Culture. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bryson, B. (1996). Anything but heavy metal. American Sociological Review, 61, 884–899.
  • Boyd, D., & Ellison, NB (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory & Research in the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–254). Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Boston: Havard University Press.
  • Bortree, D. S. (2005). Presentation of self on the Web: An ethnographic study of teenage girls’weblogs. Education, Communication & Information, 5(1), 25–39.
  • Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2006). Personal relationships: On and off the internet. In D. Pelman & Vangelisti (Eds.), Handbook of Personal Relationships. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Boase, J. (2008). Personal networks and the personal communication system: Using multiple media to connect. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 490-508.
  • Bernstein, B. (1964). Elaborated and restricted codes: Their social origins and some consequences. American Anthropologist, 66, 55–69.
  • Berking, H. (1996). Solidary individualism: The moral impact of cultural modernisation in late modernity. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity (pp.189-201). London: Routledge.
  • Berger, J., & Iyengar, R. (2013). Communication channels and word of mouth: How the medium shapes the message. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 567-579.
  • Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E., Warde, A., Gayo-Cal, M., & Wright, D.(2009). Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge.
  • Becker, H. S. (1984). Art Worlds. Oakland: University of California Press.
  • Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M. C. (2004). Social interactions across media interpersonal communication on the internet, telephone and face-to-face. New Media & Society, 6(3), 299- 318.
  • Baym, N. K., & Ledbetter, A. (2009). Tunes that bind? Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 408-427.
  • Bartsch, A., & Schneider, F. M. (2014). Entertainment and politics revisited: How non-escapist forms of entertainment can stimulate political interest and information seeking. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 369–396.
  • Barone, C. (2006). Cultural capital, ambition and the explanation of inequalities in learning outcomes: A comparative analysis. Sociology, 40(6), 1039–1058.
  • Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3), 372–374.
  • Atkin, C. K. (1972). Anticipated communication and mass-media information seeking. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 188–199.
  • Alexander, V. (2003). Sociology of Arts. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination. London: SAGE Publications.