논문상세정보
-
- 저자 안선희
- 형태사항 26 cm: 164
- 일반주기 지도교수: 성은현
- 학위논문사항 학위논문(박사)-, 호서대학교 대학원, 인재개발학과 유아교육, 2017. 2
- 발행지 천안
- 언어 kor
- 출판년 2016
- 발행사항 호서대학교 대학원
- 주제어 미술활동 생각도구 창의성 증진 부모교육프로그램
박사
미술활동과 생각도구를 통한 창의성 증진 부모교육 프로그램 개발 및 효과검증 = The Development and Effects of A Parent Education Program for Creativity Improvement Using Art Activities and Thinking Tools
안선희
2016년
'
미술활동과 생각도구를 통한 창의성 증진 부모교육 프로그램 개발 및 효과검증 = The Development and Effects of A Parent Education Program for Creativity Improvement Using Art Activities and Thinking Tools' 의 주제별 논문영향력
| 주제 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 동일주제 총논문수 | 논문피인용 총횟수 | 주제별 논문영향력의 평균 |
| 69 | 0 |
0.0% |
주제별 논문영향력
' 미술활동과 생각도구를 통한 창의성 증진 부모교육 프로그램 개발 및 효과검증 = The Development and Effects of A Parent Education Program for Creativity Improvement Using Art Activities and Thinking Tools' 의 참고문헌
-
프로젝트 접근법을 활용한 다중지능 기반 유아 창의성 증진 프로그램 개발 및 적용
-
통합적 접근에 기초한 창의성 모형 개발 및 타당화
-
초등학생의 창의성에 미치는 관련변인 구조분석
-
창의적 문제해결 모형을 적용한 미술활동이 영재와 일반아동의 창의력, 공간능력, 도형유추능력에 미치는 영향
-
창의성을 잡아요 확
-
창의성을 교육한다는 것은
-
박사
-
창의성 부모교육 프로그램이 부모의 인지적 정의적 특성, 양육태도 및 유아 창의성 신장에 미치는 효과
-
박사
-
창의성 개념과 이론
-
전래동화를 이용한 창의성 증진 프로그램 효과 연구
-
유아의 통합적 창의성 증진을 위한 부모교육 프로그램 개발 및 효과검증
-
박사
-
유아의 창의성 증진을 위한 부모교육 프로그램 개발 및 효과검증
-
아오키도모코 상담자, 심리치료사, 사회복지사, 교사를 위한 콜라주 미술치료
-
심상적 사고 능력과 심상적 사고 횟수 및 창의성간의 관계: 심상적 사고 훈련 프로그램을 적용한 창의성 증진 프로그램 개발을 위한 연구
-
숲에서의 놀이를 통한 유아 미술활동 프로그램 개발 및 효과
-
생각의 탄생. 박종성(역)(2007)
-
박사
-
미술, 과학 교과의 융합인재교육(STEAM)프로그램이 창의성과 과학적 사고에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 –초등 3학년을 중심으로-
-
교육심리학회 교육심리학용어사전서울: 학지사 [2000]
-
박사
-
Urban, K. K. (1995). Creativity-A componential appoach. Post conference China meeting of the 11th world conference on gifted and talented children. Beijing, China, August. pp. 5-8.
-
Torrance, E. P. (1999). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Norms and technical menual. Schilostic Testing Services, Bensenville, IL.
-
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. NY: Robert E. Krieger.
-
TCT-DP A형과 B형의 동형성 검증-대학생을 중심으로-
-
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd. New York: The Free Press.
-
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1993). Creative giftedness: A Multivariate investment approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), pp. 7-15.
-
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). Successful intelligence : How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. NY: Simmon & Schuster.
-
Simonton, D. K. (1977). Eminence, creativity, and geographical marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(11), pp. 805.
-
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaing Creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Rose, L. H., & Lin, H. T. (1984). The meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, pp. 11-22.
-
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1991). Teaching abstracting in an integrated art and science curriculum. Roeper Review, 13(2), pp. 85-90.
-
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1987). Tools of thought: Designing an integrated curriculum for lifelong learners. Roeper Review, 10(1), pp. 17-21.
-
Root-Bernstein, R. (2005). Desmond Morris’s two spheres. Leonardo, 38(4), pp. 318-321.
-
Root-Bernstein, M., Root-Bernstein, M., & Root-Bernstein, R. (2014). Tools for thinking applied to nature: an inclusive pedagogical framework for environmental education. Oryx, 48(04), pp. 584-592.
-
Root-Bernstein, M. M., & Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2005). Body thinking beyond dance: a tools for thinking approach. In Dance: Current Selected Research, 5(eds L. Overby &B. Lepczyk), pp. 173-202. AMS Press, New York, USA.
-
Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction doesn’t matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer(eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153-167). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
-
Miller, B. C., & Gerard, D. (1979). Family influences on the development of creativity in children: An integrative review. Family Coordinator, 28, pp. 295-312.
-
Meeker, M. (1978). Measuring creativity from the child’s point view. Journal of CreativeBehavior, 12(1), pp. 52-61.
-
Mackinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative potential. American Psychologist, 17, pp. 484-495.
-
MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). Educating for creativity: A modern myth. Training creative thinking, pp. 194-207.
-
Ligon, E. (1957). Preschooler’s creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 7, pp. 25-37.
-
Jellen, H. G., & Urban, K. K. (1986). The TCT-DP (Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production): An instrument that can be applied to most age and ability groups. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 3(11), pp. 135-155.
-
J. C. Kaufman 창의적 가정환경 질문지 개발 및 적용에 관한 탐색적 연구
-
Isaksen, S. G. (1987). Introduction: An orientation to the frontiers of creativity research. In S.G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 1-26). Buffalo, New York: Bearly Limited.
-
Hill, K. G. (1991). An ecological approach to creativity and motivation: Trait and environment influences in the college classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brandeis Universit, Waltham, Mass.
-
Hendrick, R. J. (1992). Child psychology. Eaglewood Cliffs. N. J.: Prentice Hall.
-
Guilford, J. P. (1959). The Three Faces of Intellect. American Psychologist’s Press.
-
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, pp. 444-454.
-
Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how school should teach. New York : Basic Books.
-
Feldman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Dudek, S. Z., & Hall, W. B. (1991). Presonality Consistency : Eminent architects 25 years later. Creativity Research Journal, 4(3), pp. 213-231.
-
Dacey, J. S., & Lennon, K. H. (2004). Understanding creativity. CA: Jossey-Bass.
-
Dacey, J. S. (1999, Originally published 1989). Peak periods of creative growth across the lifespan. In Puccio. G. J., & Murdock. M. C.(Ed.). Creativity assessment: Reading and resources(pp. 323-345). Buffalo, NY: CEF Press..
-
Dacey, J. S. (1989). Discriminating characteristics of the families of highly creative adolescence, Journal of Creative Behavor, 23, pp. 263-271.
-
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implication of a system perspectives for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
-
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. H. (2000). Fostering creativity in engineering undergraduates, High Ability Studies, 11, pp. 207-219.
-
Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education & learning: A guide for teacher and educators. London: Routledge Falmer.
-
Cropley, A. J. (1999). Definitions creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. P. Steven (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 511-524). san Diego, DA: Academic Press.
-
Barron, F. (1995). Disposition toward originality, Journal of Abnormal, Social Psychology, 51, pp. 478-488.
-
Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
-
Baer, J., & Garrett, T. (2010). Teaching for creativity in an era of content standards and accountability. Nurturing creativity in the classroom, pp. 6-23.
-
An, D., Song, Y., & Carr, M. (2016). A comparison of two models of creativity: Divergent thinking and creative expert performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, pp. 78-84.
-
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, Co. West view, pp. 212-213.
-
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.