연구동향 분석
박사

Evaluation of the fitness of dental prosthesis produced by traditional, Subtractive, and additive manufacturing method : 전통적인 가공방식과 절삭가공방식 및 적층가공방식으로 제작된 치과보철물의 적합도에 관한 연구

박진영 2016년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' Evaluation of the fitness of dental prosthesis produced by traditional, Subtractive, and additive manufacturing method : 전통적인 가공방식과 절삭가공방식 및 적층가공방식으로 제작된 치과보철물의 적합도에 관한 연구' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • Additive manufacturing
  • Implant
  • Interim restoration
  • Marginal and internal gap
  • Silicone replicas
  • Traditional manufacturing
  • subtractive manufacturing
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
358 0

0.0%

' Evaluation of the fitness of dental prosthesis produced by traditional, Subtractive, and additive manufacturing method : 전통적인 가공방식과 절삭가공방식 및 적층가공방식으로 제작된 치과보철물의 적합도에 관한 연구' 의 참고문헌

  • Şeker E, Ozcelik TB, Rathi N, Yilmaz B. Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD/CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data. J ProsthetDent 2015;115:47-51.
  • rtorp A, J nsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern PV. The fit of cobalt–chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2011;27:356-363.
  • Zinelis S. Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different In- Ceram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:278-292.
  • Zaghloul HH, Younis JF. Marginal fit of implant-supported allceramic zirconia frameworks. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:417-424.
  • Witkowski S. (CAD-)/CAM in der Zahntechnik: Buyer’s guide. Zahntech Mag. 2002; 6: 696-709.
  • Taylor RH. Computer-integrated surgery: technology and clinical applications: Mit Press; 1996.
  • Tamac E, Toksavul S, Toman M. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:909-913.
  • Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, et al. Polyetheretherketone—a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013;101:1209-1216.
  • Stanojevic M, Sljivic M, Plancak M, Djurdjevic D: ADVANCED INVESTIGATION ON RAPID PROTOTYPING TECHNIQUES IN MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY AND IMPLANTING PREPARATION. Journal for Technology of Plasticity 2014, 39.
  • Song TJ, Kwon TK, Yang JH, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yeo IS. Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:219-225.
  • Snyder TJ, Andrews M, Weislogel M, Moeck P, Stone-Sundberg J, Birkes D, Hoffert MP, Lindeman A, Morrill J, Fercak O. 3D systems' technology overview and new applications in manufacturing, engineering, science, and education. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 2014;1:169-176.
  • Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CHF. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:383-388.
  • Sachs C, Groesser J, Stadelmann M, Schweiger J, Erdelt K, Beuer F: Full-arch prostheses from translucent zirconia: Accuracy of fit. Dental Materials 2014, 30:817-823.
  • Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2006. p. 85-493.
  • Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of allceramic three-unit fixed dental prosthesis, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174-179.
  • Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Sayed NM, Ibrahim A, Jimbo R. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:414-419.
  • Raju SR. Comparision of marginal fit of zirconium oxide copings generated using four different CAD-CAM systems-an in vitro study. J Res Adv Dent 2014; 3:163-171.
  • Raigrodski, Ariel J. Soft tissue management: the restorative perspective – putting concepts into practice. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2015. p. 209.
  • Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M: Marginal and internal fit of metalceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dental Materials 2008, 24:1311-1315.
  • Pe ate L, Basilio J, Roig M, Mercad M. Comparative study of interim materials for direct fixed dental prostheses and their fabrication with CAD/CAM technique. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:248-253.
  • Patras M, Naka O, Doukoudakis S, Pissiotis A. Management of Provisional Restorations' Deficiencies: A Literature Review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:26-38.
  • Park KJ, Schneider H, Haak R. Assessment of defects at tooth/selfadhering flowable composite interface using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Dent Mater 2015;31:534-541.
  • Park J-Y, Kim H-Y, Kim J-H, Kim J-H, Kim W-C. Comparison of prosthetic models produced by traditional and additive manufacturing methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:294-302.
  • Neves FD, Prado CJ, Prudente MS, Carneiro TA, Zancop K, Davi LR, Mendon a G, Cooper LF, Soares CJ. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1134-1140.
  • Nakamura T, Nonaka M, Maruyama T. In vitro fitting accuracy of copy-milled alumina cores and all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1999;13:189-193.
  • Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56.
  • Mino T, Maekawa K, Ueda A, Higuchi S, Sejima J, Takeuchi T, et al. In silico comparison of the reproducibility of full-arch implant provisional restorations to final restoration between a 3D Scan/CAD/CAM technique and the conventional method. J Prosthodont Res 2015;59:152-158.
  • McLean J, Von Fraunhofer J. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;3:107-111.
  • Martins LM, Lorenzoni FC, Melo AO, Silva LM, Oliveira JL, Oliveira PC, et al. Internal fit of two all-ceramic systems and metalceramic crowns. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:235-240.
  • Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns–validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-164.
  • Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Tsumita M, Miyashita A, Vult von Steyern P, Fukushima S. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:526-530.
  • Kim K-B, Kim W-C, Kim H-Y, Kim J-H: An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system. Dental Materials 2013, 29:e91-e96.
  • Kim K-B, Kim J-H, Kim W-C, Kim J-H: In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by stereolithography. Dental materials journal 2014, 33:504- 509.
  • Katsoulis J, Mericske‐Stern R, Rotkina L, Zb ren C, Enkling N, Blatz MB. Precision of fit of implant‐supported screw‐retained 10‐unit computer‐aided‐designed and computer‐aided‐manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:165-174.
  • Karl M, Graef F, Wichmann M, Beck N. Microfractures in metalceramic and all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses caused by super-structure fixation. Dent Mater J 2012;31:338-345.
  • Kahramanoğlu E, Kulak-Ozkan Y. Marginal and internal adaptation of different superstructure and abutment materials using two different implant systems for five-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;28:1207-1216.
  • Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1991;6:270–276.
  • Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, Zhao Y, Zhang X. Clinical marginal and internal fit of crowns fabricated using different CAD/CAM technologies. J Prosthodont 2014;24:291-295.
  • Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-408.
  • Gueth J-F, Zuch T, Zwinge S, Engels J, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D. Optical properties of manually and CAD/CAM-fabricated polymers. Dent Mater J 2013;32:865-871.
  • Groten M, Axmann D, Pr bster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:40-49.
  • Gordon R. Trends in commercial 3D printing and additive manufacturing. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing2015;2:89-90.
  • G th JF, Almeida E Silva JS, Ramberger M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Treatment concept with CAD/CAM‐fabricated high‐density polymer temporary restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:310-318.
  • Fransson B, ilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1985;1:197-199.
  • Ehrenberg D, Weiner GI, Weiner S. Long-term effects of storage and thermal cycling on the marginal adaptation of provisional resin crowns: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:230-236.
  • Edelhoff D, Beuer F, Schweiger J, Brix O, Stimmelmayr M, Guth J. CAD/CAM-generated high-density polymer restorations for the pretreatment of complex cases: a case report. Quintessence Int 2012;43:457-467.
  • Duret F, Preston J. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Current opinion in dentistry. 1991;1:150-154.
  • Dentistry–Denture Base Polymers, ISO 1567. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1999.
  • Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona . Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 2013;29:174-180.
  • Brunette DM. Critical thinking: understanding and evaluating dental research. 2th ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2007. p. 65.
  • Bornemann G, Lemelson S, Luthardt R. Innovative method for the analysis of the internal 3D fitting accuracy of Cerec-3 crowns. Int J Comput Dent 2002;5:177-182.
  • Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-447.
  • Beuer F, Neumeier P, Naumann M. Marginal fit of 14‐unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:142-149.
  • Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen J. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. Dent Mater 2009;25:94-102.
  • Belser U, MacEntee M, Richter W. Fit of three porcelain-fused-tometal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:24-29.
  • Bayramoğlu E, zkan YK, Yildiz C. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three-and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:52-58.
  • Att W, Hoischen T, Gerds T, Strub JR. Marginal adaptation of allceramic crowns on implant abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10:218-225.
  • Anunmana C, Charoenchitt M, Asvanund C. Gap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:253-258.
  • American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association. ANSI/ADA specification No. 19. Dental elastomeric impression materials; ISO 4823:2000. Chicago: American Dental Association, 2004. Available at: http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prodsservices/ ISOstore/store.html. Last Accessed July 31, 2015.
  • Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Ara jo , Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, G th JF. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:515-523.
  • Alexander Wunsche., et al. CAD/CAM Practical Techniques for Dentists and Dental Technicians, Korean translation right 2014 by Dental Communication
  • Al-Omari WM, Shadid R, Abu-Naba’a L, El Masoud B. Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screwcement- retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns. J Prosthodont 2010;19:263-273.
  • Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennamoun M. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent 2014;2014:783-798.