연구동향 분석
박사

최적토지이용을 위한 지자체간 계획권한 배분 : 일반균형모형 분석

김일현 2016년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 최적토지이용을 위한 지자체간 계획권한 배분 : 일반균형모형 분석' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 토목 공학
  • 계획권한
  • 일반균형모형
  • 지방자치
  • 토지이용계획
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
824 0

0.0%

' 최적토지이용을 위한 지자체간 계획권한 배분 : 일반균형모형 분석' 의 참고문헌

  • 혼잡통행료로 인한 토지이용과 도시크기의 변화 - 분 산고용모형을 이용하여 -
    유상균 서울대학교 대학원 [2008]
  • 토지자원개발의 종합적 접근: 국토개발수단으로서의 토 지정책
    권태준 지역개발연구 [1975]
  • 택지개발사업이 지방재정 안정성에 미치는 시계열적 효 과분석
    이준호 서울대학교 대학원 [2007]
  • 커뮤니티웰빙 지표에 대한 공 무원과 전문가의 평가비교연구
    기영화 김남숙 김윤지 이승종 한국행정학보 [2013]
  • 정부 3.0 시대의 지역사회 안전과 위기 대응력 제고
    이승종 지방행정 [2013]
  • 재산세, 도시크기 및 조세부담
    박한상 서울대학교 대학원 [2008]
  • 서울시 패널자료를 활용한 커뮤니티웰빙 개념구조와 측정지표의 적합성 분석
    기영화 서인석 이승종 한국사회와 행정연구 [2014]
  • 사회자본과 행정: 정부형성과 거버넌스 – 이론적 연결 고리의 탐색 및 지방 거버넌스에서의 적용
    이종원 정부학연구 [2002]
  • 밀도결합형 셀룰라 오토마타 모형의 개발
    임창호 최대식 국토 계획 [2004]
  • 도시성장 분석 및 예측을 위한 셀룰라 오토마타 모델의 개발
    김용일 이창무 정재준 국토계획 [2002]
  • 기반시설재원 조달수단과 도시개발
    김하영 서울대학교 대학원 [2010]
  • 거버넌스와 행정국가
    김정렬 한국행정학회 [2001]
  • 거버넌스에 대한 새로운 이해
    조성한 국가정책연구 [2005]
  • Young, K. (1986), Local authorities and economic development: a preliminary analysis, Critical Issues in Urban Economic.
  • Wright, S. D. (1988), Understanding intergovernmental relations, Brooks/Cole Pub Co.
  • Wildavsky, A. (1979), Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis, Transaction Publishers.
  • Wheaton, W. (1998), Land use and density in cities with congestion, Journal of urban economics.
  • Wambach, A. (1999), Bertrand competition under cost uncertainty, International Journal of Industrial Organization.
  • Vogel, R. K. (1997), Handbook of research on urban politics and policy in the United States, Greenwood Press.
  • Vickrey, W. (1999), Spatial competition, monopolistic competition, and optimum production diversity, International Journal of Industrial Organization.
  • Thomas, A. (1996), What is development management?, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Stoker, G. (2000), Urban political science and the challenge of urban governance, Oxford University Press.
  • Stoker, G. (1998), Governance as theory: five propositions, International Social Science Journal.
  • Starling, G. (1977), Managing the public sector, Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Smith, B. (1985), Decentralization: the territorial dimension of the state, HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.
  • Small, Kenneth, A. and Kazimi, C. (1995), On the cost of air pollution from motor vehicle, Journal of Transport Economics and policy.
  • Small, Kenneth, A. (1995), Urban Transportation Economics, Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.
  • Small, Kenneth, A. (1983), The incidence of congestion tolls on urban highways, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Shimizu, D. (2002), Product differentiation in spatial Cournot markets, Economics Letters.
  • Scalzo, V. (2010), Pareto efficient Nash equilibria in discontinuous games, Economics Letters.
  • Rusk, D. (1993), Cities without suburbs, Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
  • Routledge, R. (2010), Bertrand competition with cost uncertainty, Economics Letters.
  • Rondinelli, DA. (1990), Decentralization, territorial power and the state: a critical response, Development and Change.
  • Rhodes, R. (1997), Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability, Open University Press.
  • Rhodes, R. (1997), From marketization to diplomacy: It’s the mix that matters, Public Policy and Administration.
  • Rhodes, R. (1996), The new governance: governing without govrnment, Political Studies.
  • Rhee, H., Yu, S., Hirte, G. (2013), Zoning in cities with traffic congestion and agglomeration economies, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Pierre, J. and Peters, GB. (2000), Governance, politics and the state, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Pierre, J. and Peters, GB. (2000), Citizens versus the new public manager: the problem of mutual empowerment, Administration & Society.
  • Peters, BG. and Pierre, J. (1998), Institutions and time: problem of conceptualization and explanation, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
  • Peters, BG. and Pierre, J. (1998), Governance without government? Rethinking public administration, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
  • Peters, BG. (2001), The future of governing, University Press of Kansas.
  • Peters, BG. (1980), Fiscal strains on the welfare state: causes and consequences, Fiscal Stress and Public Policy.
  • Peter, BG. (2001), Politicians and bureaucrats in the politics of policy making, Public Management: Critical Perspectives.
  • Pal, D. (1998), Does Cournot competition yield spatial agglomeration?, Economics Letters.
  • Oakerson, RJ. (1990), Institutional diversity and rural development in America: an institutionalist’s approach to rural studies, Rural development news.
  • O'Sullivan, 이번송 역. , 오설리반의 도시경제학
    전영사 [2004]
  • Matsushima, N. (2001), Cournot competition and spatial agglomeration revisited, Economics Letters.
  • Matsumura, T., Shimizu, D. (2005), Spatial Cournot competition and economic welfare: a note, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Malpezzi, S. (1996), Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in U.S. metropolitan areas, Journal of Housing Research.
  • Lofaro, A. (2002), On the efficiency of Bertrand and COurnot competition under incomplete information, European Journal of Political Economy.
  • Lindblom, C. E. (1976), The science of ‘Muddling through’, Public Administration: Concepts and Cases.
  • Liang, W., Hwang, H., Mai, C. (2006), Spatial discrimination: Bertrand vs. Cournot with asymmetric demands, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Lerner, A. P., Singer, H. W. (1937), Notes on duopoly and spatial competition, Journal of political economy.
  • Lai, F., Tsai, J. (2004), Duopoly locations and optimal zoning in a small open city, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Kooiman, J. (1993), Modern governance: new government-society interactions, SAGE Publications Inc.
  • Kockelman K. (2001), A model for time- and budget-constrained activity demand analysis, Transportation Research B.
  • Kitamura, R., Fujii, S. and pas, E. (1997), Time-use data analysis and modeling:toward the next generation of transportation planning methodologies. Transport Policy.
  • Kanemoto, Y. (2013), Second-best cost-benefit analysis in monopolistic competition models of urban agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Kanamoto, Y. (1996), Agglomeration economies and a test for optimal city sizes in Japan, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies.
  • John, P. (2001), Local governance in Western Europe, SAGE Publication Ltd.
  • Jaeger, W., Plantinga, A., Grout, C. (2012), How has Oregon’s land use planning system affected property values?, Land Use Policy.
  • Jacobs, J. (1961), The death and life of great American cities, Random House.
  • Hawkins, BW. and Ihrke, DM. (1999), Research note: Reexamining the suburban exploitation thesis in American metropolitan areas, The Journal of Federalism.
  • Hamilton, J. (1989), Spatial discrimination: Bertrand vs. Cournot in a model of location choice, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Hall, PA. (1993), Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain, Comparative Politics.
  • Gustley, R. (1977), The allocational and distributional impacts of governmental consolidation, Urban Affairs Quarterly.
  • Gurr and King. (1987), The state and the city, Univercity of Chicago Press.
  • Gupta, B., Pal, D., Sarkar, J. (1997), Spatial Cournot competition and agglomeration in a model of location choice, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Grout, C., Jaeger, W., Plantinga, A. (2011), Land-use regulations and property values in Portland, Oregon: a regression discontinuity design approach, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Goss, S. (2001), Making local governance work: networks, relationships, and the management of change, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Fesler, J. (1996), The politics of the administrative process, Chatnam House Publishers.
  • Ferlie, E. (1996), The new public management in action, Oxford University Press.
  • Elberfeld, W., Wolfstetter, E. (1999), A dynamic model of Bertrand competition with entry, International Journal of Industrial Organization.
  • Eberts, RW. and Gronberg, TJ. (1990), Structure, conduct, and performance in the local public sector, National Tax Journal.
  • Easton, D. (1953), The politic system, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15(1): 131-132.
  • Dillinger, W. (1994), Decentralization and its implications for urban service delivery, World Bank.
  • DiLorenzo, TJ. (1983), Economic competition and political competition: An empirical note, Public Choice.
  • Dear, M. and Clark, GL. (1981), Dimensions of local state autonomy, Environment and Planning A.
  • De Borger, B., Proost, S. (2012), Transport policy competition between governments: a selective survey of the literature, Economics of Transportation.
  • Dastidar, K. (1996), Comparing Cournot and Bertrand in a homogeneous product market, Journal of Economic Theory.
  • Dasgupta, P., Stiglitz, J. E. (1988), Potential competition, actual competition and economic welfare, European Economic Review.
  • Darby, J., Ferrett, B., Wooton, I. (2014), Regional centrality and tax competition for FDI, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Cockburn, C. (1977), The local state: management of cities and people, Community Development Journal.
  • Chen, C., Lai, F. (2008), Location choice and optimal zoning under Cournot competition, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Capozza, D. (1994), The risk structure of land markets, Journal of urban economics.
  • Capozza, D. (1990), The stochastic city, Journal of urban economics.
  • Brueckner, J., Largey, A. (2008), Social interaction and urban sprawl, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Brueckner, J. (1983), Property value maximization and public sector efficiency, Journal of urban economics.
  • Braid, R. (2012), State and local tax competition in a spatial model with sales taxes and residential property taxes, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Braid, R. (2012), Search costs decrease prices in a model of spatial competition, Regional Science.
  • Braid, R. (2010), Provision of a pure local public good in a spatial model with many jurisdictions, Journal of Public Economics.
  • Braid, R. (2010), Bertrand-Nash mill pricing and the locations of two firms with partially overlapping product selections, Regional Science.
  • Braid, R. (2009), The employment effects of a central city’s source-based wage tax or hybrid wage tax, Regional Ecience and Urban Economics.
  • Braid, R. (2008), Spatial price discrimination and the locations of firms with different product selections or product varieties, Economic Letters.
  • Braid, R. (2006), The equilibrium locations of three stores with different selections of differentiated products, Economics Letters.
  • Braid, R. (2005), Tax competition, tax exporting and higher-government choice of tax instruments for local governments, Journal of Public Economics.
  • Braid, R. (2003), Spatial price competition between large and small stores with stockouts or limited product selections, Economics Letters.
  • Braid, R. (2003), A three-input model of the spatial effects of a central-city wage tax, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Braid, R. (2002), The spatial effects of wage or property tax differentials, and local government choice between tax instruments, Journal of urban economics.
  • Braid, R. (2001), Spatial growth and redevelopment with perfect foresight and durable housing, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Braid, R. (2001), Cost-reducing horizontal mergers that leave prices unchanged in models of spatial competition, Economic Letters.
  • Braid, R. (1999), The price and profit effects of horizontal mergers in two-dimentional spatial competition, Economics Letters.
  • Braid, R. (1999), A spatial model of tax competition with multiple tax instruments, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Braid, R. (1998), Spatial price competition when stores are not certain to have what consumers want, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Braid, R. (1996), Symmetric tax competition with multiple jurisdictions in each metropolitan area, The American Economic Review.
  • Braid, R. (1989), Retail competition along intersecting roadways, Regional Science and Uran Economics.
  • Braid, R. (1988), Heterogeneous preferences and non-central agglomeration of firms, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Bennett, RJ. (1990), Decentralization, local governments, and markets: towards a post-welfare agenda, Clarendon Press.
  • Ben-Akiva, Moshe and Lerman, Steven, R. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis, Cambridge, Massachusettes: MIT Press.
  • Bath, C. and Koppelman, F. (1999), A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research, Transportation.
  • Barlow, I. M. (1991), Metropolitan government, Routledge.
  • Baker, R. (1992), Scale and administrative performance: the governance of small states and microstates, Center for Global Change and World.
  • Atkinson, A. B., Stiglitz, J. E. (1976), The design of tax structure: direct versus indirect taxation, Journal of Public Economics.
  • Arnott, R., Stiglitz, J. E. (1979), Aggregate land rents, expenditure on public goods, and optimal city size, The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
  • Arnott, R. (2007), Congestion tolling with agglomeration externalities, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Anas, A., Rhee, HJ. (2007), When are urban growth boundaries not second-best policies to congestion tolls?, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Anas, A., Pines, P. (2008), Anti-sprawl policies in a system of congested cities, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Anas, A., Arnott, R., Small, K. (1998), Urban spatial structure, Journal of Economic Literature.
  • Anas, A. and Xu, R. (1999), Congestion, land use and job dispertion, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Anas, A. and Rhee, H. J. (2007), When are urban growth boundaries not a second-best to congestion tolls?, Journal of Urban Economics.
  • Anas, A. and Rhee, H. J. (2006), Curbing excess sprawl with congestion tolls and urban boundaries, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Amir, R., Jin, J. (2001), Cournot and Bertrand equilibria compared: substitutability, complementarity and concavity, International Journal of Industrial Organization.