연구동향 분석
박사

‘대표의 허구’에 관한 연구 : 토마스 홉스,칼 슈미트,한스 켈젠에게 있어서의 대리와 현시의 대표 이론 = On the Fiction of Representation: Delegation and Presentation in the Theory of Political Representation in Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen

홍철기 2016년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' ‘대표의 허구’에 관한 연구 : 토마스 홉스,칼 슈미트,한스 켈젠에게 있어서의 대리와 현시의 대표 이론 = On the Fiction of Representation: Delegation and Presentation in the Theory of Political Representation in Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 정치학(정치와 정부)
  • 대리
  • 대표의 허구
  • 대표제 민주주의
  • 대표제 정부
  • 인민주권
  • 현시
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
206 0

0.0%

' ‘대표의 허구’에 관한 연구 : 토마스 홉스,칼 슈미트,한스 켈젠에게 있어서의 대리와 현시의 대표 이론 = On the Fiction of Representation: Delegation and Presentation in the Theory of Political Representation in Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen' 의 참고문헌

  • 자유위임과 명령적 위임
    유승익(Yoo, Seung-Ik) 『법학 논총』33, 299-318 [2015]
  • 위기시대의 헌법학 –바이마르 헌법학이 본 정당과 단체-
    송석윤 서울: 정우사 [2002]
  • 벤베니스트, 에밀. 『인도 유럽사회의 제도 문화 어휘 연구』, 김현권 옮 김
    서울: 아르케 [1999]
  • 버나드. 『선거는 민주적인가: 현대 대의 민주주의의 원칙에 대한 비판적 고찰』, 곽준혁 옮김
    마넹 서울: 후마니타스 [2004]
  • 「칸트와 대의」
    정호원 서병훈 외 지음, 『왜 대의민주주의인가』, 서 울: 이학사, 203-245 [2011]
  • 「정치적인 것의 발견과 현대 민주주의의 모색」
    홍태영 홍태영 외 지 음, 『현대 정치철학의 모험』, 서울: 난장. 17-51 [2010]
  • 「정치적 ‘대표’ 개념과 대의제: 독일 입헌군주정의 ‘대표’ 개념을 둘러싼 논쟁」
    오향미 서병훈 외 지음, 『왜 대의민주주의인가』, 서울: 이학사. 279-312 [2011]
  • 「서양 중세의 대의 사상: 대표성의 실체에 대한 비판적 검토」
    이화용 서병훈 외 지음, 『왜 대의민주주의인가』, 서울: 이학사. 147-170 [2011]
  • 「독일 기본법의 “방어적 민주주의” 원리: 그 헌법이론적 논거의 배경」
    오향미 『의정연구』17: 2, 111-139 [2012]
  • 「대표제개념의 헌법사」
    송석윤 송석윤 지음,『헌법과 정치』, 서울: 경인문화사, 31-60 [2007]
  • 「대의민주주의의 꿈과 포부, 그리고 과제」
    서병훈 서병훈 외 지음, 『왜 대의민주주의인가』, 서울: 이학사, 13-29 [2011]
  • _______. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
  • ______.ﾠ2007. "Understanding the Present Through the Past?: Quentin Skinner and Pierre Rosanvallon on the Crisis of Political Representation",ﾠRedescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History, pp. 45-60.
  • ______. ed. 1999. The Challenge of Carl Schmitt. London: Verso.
  • ______. 2012b. “The Impurity of Representation and the Vitality of Democracy,” Cultural Studies 26: 2-3 (March-May), pp. 207-222.
  • ______. 2012a. “Democratic Representation and the Constituency Paradox,” Perspectives on Politics 10: 3 (September), pp. 599-616.
  • ______. 2012. “Postface la deuzi me dition: La d mocratie du public reconsid r e,” in Principes du government repr sentatif. Paris: Flammarion.
  • ______. 2011. “Towards a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation,” American Political Science Review 105: 1 (February), pp. 100-114.
  • ______. 2011. “Concepts of Representation,” American Political Science Review 105: 3 (August), pp. 1-11.
  • ______. 2011. “Clarifying the Concept of Representation,” American Political Science Review 105: 3 (August), pp. 621-629.
  • ______. 2011. Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • ______. 2011. "Representative Democracy and Its Critics", in The Future of Representative Democracy, eds. Sonia Alonso, John Keane, and Wolfgang Merkel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). pp. 23-39.
  • ______. 2010. “Representing Future Generations: Political Presentism and Democratic Trusteeship,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13: 1 (March), pp. 17-37.
  • ______. 2009. “Varieties of Public Representation,” in Ian Shaporo, Susan C. Stokes, Elisabeth Jean Wood, and Alexander S. Kirshner (eds), Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61-89.
  • ______. 2009. “Unpolitical Democracy,” Political Theory 38: 1, pp. 65-92.
  • ______. 2009. “Representation Rethought: On trustess, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy,” American Political Science Review 103: 2 (May), pp. 214-230.
  • ______. 2009. “Hobbes’s Theory of Representation: Anti-democratic or Proto-democratic?,” in Ian Shaporo, Susan C. Stokes, Elisabeth Jean Wood, and Alexander S. Kirshner (eds), Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-34.
  • ______. 2009. Der Begriff des Politischen: Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  • ______. 2008. Wer soll H ter der Verfassung sein?: Abhandlungen zur Theorie der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in der plaralistischen, parlamnetarischen Demokratie. hrsg. Robert Chr. van Ooyen. T bingen: Mohr Siebeck,
  • ______. 2008. Counter-democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ______. 2007. “The Paradox of Political Representation,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 15: 1, pp. 93-114.
  • ______. 2006. “Toward a Philosophical History of the Political,” in Democracy Past and Future, ed. Samuel Moyn. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • ______. 2006. Verteidigung der Demokratie: Abhandlungen zur Demokratietheorie. hrsg. Matthias Jestaedt & Oliver Lepsius. T bingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  • ______. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles & Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • ______. 2006. Leo Strauss and the Theologico-Political Problem. trans. Marcus Brainard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ______. 2005. “Hobbes on Representation,” European Journal of Philosophy 13: 2, pp. 155-184.
  • ______. 2005. “Continuity and Rupture: The Power of Judgment in Democratic Representation,” Constellations 12: 2, pp. 194-222.
  • ______. 2005. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
  • ______. 2004. “Representation and Democracy: Uneasy Alliance,” Scandinavian Political Studies 27: 3, 335-342.
  • ______. 2004. “Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory of Representation,” Journal of the History of Ideas 65: 1 (January), pp. 113-134.
  • ______. 2004. Constitutional Failure: Carl Schmitt in Weimar. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • ______. 2003. “Rethinking Representation,” American Political Science Review 97: 4, pp. 515-528.
  • ______. 2003. Pour une histoire conceptualle du politique. Paris: Seuil.
  • ______. 2002b. “Representational Democracy: An Aesthetic Approach to Conflict and Compromise,” Common Knowledge 8: 1, pp. 24-46.
  • ______. 2002a. Political Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ______. 2002. R mischer Katholizismus und Politische Form. Klett-Cotta.
  • ______. 2002. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • ______. 2000. “Debate: What Kind of Person is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Skinner,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 8: 2, pp. 268-278.
  • ______. 2000. La d mocratie inachev e: Histoire de la souverainet du peuple en France. Paris: Gallimard.
  • ______. 1999. “Republican Freedom and Contestatory Democratization,” in eds. Ian Shapiro & Casiano Hacker-Crod n. Democracy’s Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163-190.
  • ______. 1998. We the People: Tranformations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • ______. 1998. The Lesson of Carl Schmitt: Four Chapters on the Distinction between Political Theology and Political Philosophy. trans. Marcus Brainard.
  • ______. 1998. The Inclusion of the Others: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • ______. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • ______. 1998. The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • ______. 1998. On the Citizen. ed. Richard Tuck & Michael Silverthrone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ______. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ______. 1996b. Politische Theologie II: Die Legende von der Erleidigung jeder politischen Theologie. Berlin: Dunkcer & Humblot.
  • ______. 1996a. Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souvern nit t. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  • ______. 1995. “Starker Staat und gesunde Wirtschaft (1932),” in Staat, Gro raum, Nomos: Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916-1969. hrsg. G nter Maschke, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. pp. 71-91.
  • ______. 1993. Verfassungslehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  • ______. 1991. General Theory of Norms. trans. Michael Hartney. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • ______. 1989. “The Essence of the Political in Carl Schmitt.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 1: 1, pp. 63-75.
  • ______. 1985b. Hamlet oder Hekuba: Der Einbruch der Zeit in das Spiel. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
  • ______. 1985a. Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlementarismus. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  • ______. 1981. Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. Aalen: Scientia.
  • ______. 1970. Pure Theory of Law. trans. Max Knight. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1970.
  • ______. 1968. “Commentary: The paradox of representation,” Nomos X, Representation, ed. Roland J. Pennock & John W. Chapman, New York: Atherton, pp. 38-42.
  • ______. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • ______. 1963. On Revolution. New York: Viking Press.
  • ______. 1959. “On the Basic Norm,” California Law Review 47: 1, pp. 107-110.
  • ______. 1955. “Foundations of Democracy,” Ethics 66: 1 (October), pp. 1-101.
  • ______. 1951. “Science and Poiltics,” The American Political Science Review 45: 3 (September), pp. 641-661.
  • ______. 1949. General Theory of Law and State. trans. Anders Wedberg. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • ______. 1948. “Absolutism and Relativism in Philosophy and Politics.” Amercian Political Science Review 42: 5 (October), pp. 906-914.
  • Young, Iris Marion. 1997. “Deferring Group Representation,” in NOMOS XXXIX, Ethnicity and Group Rights, eds. Ian Shapiro and Will Kymlicka. New York: NYU Press, pp. 349-376.
  • Wood. Gordon S. 2008. Representation in the American Revolution. Revised Edition. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
  • Weymens, Wim. 2005. “Freedom through Political Representation: Lefort, Gauchet and Rosanvallon on the Relationship between State and Society,” European Journal of Political Theory 4: 3, 263-282.
  • Urbinati, Nadia. 2000. “Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation,” Political Theory 28: 6 (December), pp. 758-786.
  • Urbinati, Nadia & Carlo Invenzzini Accetti. 2013. “Editor’s Introduction” in Hans Kelsen, The Essence and Value of Democracy. trans Brian Graf. Plymouth: Rowan & Littlefield, pp. 1-24.
  • Troper, Michel. 1999. ““The Guardian of the Constitution”-Hans Kelsen’s Evaluation of a Legal Concept,” in eds. Dan Diner & Michael Stolleis, Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt: A Juxtaposition. Gerlingen: Bleicher, pp. 81-100.
  • Tierney, Brian. 1983. “The Idea of Representation in the Medieval Councils of the West,” Concilium 19, pp. 25-30.
  • Thompson, Dennis F. 2005. “Democracy in Time: Popular Sovereignty and Temporal Representation,” Constellations 12: 2, pp. 245-261.
  • Strauss, Leo. 1995. “Notes on Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political,” in Heinrich Meier, Carl Schmitt & Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue. trans. J. Harvey Lomax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 91-120.
  • Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Skinner, Quentin. 1999. “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 7: 1, pp. 1-29.
  • Singer, Brian C. J. 2006. “Thinking the ‘Social’ with Claude Lefort,” Thesis Eleven 87 (November), pp. 83-95.
  • Siey s, Emmanuel-Joseph. 1985. crits politiques. Bruxelles: dition des archives contemporaines.
  • Shapiro, Ian. 2009. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Schwab, George. 1989. The Challenge of Execption: An Introduction to the Political Ideas of Carl Schmitt Between 1921 and 1936. Praeger.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1975. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper.
  • Schmitt, Carl. 1978. Die Diktatur: Von den Anf ngen des mordernen Souver nit tsgedankens bis zum proletarischen Klassenkampf. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chantam: Chantam House.
  • Runciman, David. 1997. Pluralism and the Personality of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rousseau. Jean-Jacques. 1964. OEuvres compl tes. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Rosanvallon, Pierre. 1998. Le peuple introuvable: Histoire de la repr sentation d mocratique en France. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Rehfeld, Andrew. 2006. “Towards a General Theory of Political Representation,” Journal of Politics 68: 1 (February), pp. 1-21.
  • Pye, Christopher. 1984. “The Sovereign, the Theater, and the Kingdom of Darkness: Hobbes and the Spectacle Power,” Representations 8 (Autumn), pp. 84-106.
  • Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense,” in eds. Ian Shapiro & Casiano Hacker-Crod n. Democracy’s Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23-55.
  • Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes, & Bernard Manin. 1999. “Introduction,” in eds. Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes & Bernard Manin, Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-26.
  • Preuss, Urlich K. 1999. “Political Order and Democracy: Carl Schmitt and His Influence,” in ed. Chantal Mouffe. The Challenge of Carl Schmitt. London: Verso. pp. 155-179.
  • Post, Gaines. 1964. Studies in Medieval Legal Thought: Public Law and the State, 1100-1322. Clark: Lawbook Exchange.
  • Plotke, David. 1997. “Representation is Democracy,” Constellations 4: 1, pp. 19-34.
  • Plot, Martin. ed. 2013. Claude Lefort: Thinker of the Political. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Pitkin, Hanna F. 1964. “Hobbes’s Concept of Representation I & II,” The American Political Science Review 58: 2/4 (June/December), pp. 328-340; 902-918.
  • Phillips, Anne. 1995. Politics of Presence: The Political Representation of Gender, Ethnicity, and Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxfrod University Press.
  • Pennington, Kenneth. 2004. “Representation in Medieval Canon Law,” The Jurist 64, pp. 361-383.
  • Pasquino, Pasquale. 1988. “Die Lehre von “pouvoir constituant” bei Emmanuel Siey s und Carl Schmitt,” in Complexio Oppositorum: ber Carl Schmitt. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 371-385.
  • Papadopoulos, Yannis. 1995. “Analysis of Functions and Dysfuctions of Direct Democracy: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives,” Politics & Society 23, pp. 421-48.
  • Pankakoski, Timo. 2013. “Reoccupying Secularization: Schmitt and Koselleck on Blumenberg’s Challenge,” History and Theory 52 (May), pp. 214-245.
  • Pan, David. 2009. “Historical Event and Mythic Meaning in Carl Schmitt’s Hamlet or Hecuba,” in Carl Schmitt, Hamlet or Hecuba: The Intrusion of the Time into the Play, trans. David Pan & Jennifer Rust. New York: Telos Press. pp. 69-119.
  • Oakeshott, Micahel. 1996. The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • N sstr m, Sofia. 2006. “Representative Democracy as Tautology: Ankersmit and Lefort on Representation,” European Journal of Political Theory 5: 3, pp. 321-342.
  • Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
  • Morgan, Edmund S. 1989. Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereigntyin England and America. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Montanaro, Laura. 2012. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-Appointed Representatives,” The Journal of Politics 74: 4 (October), pp. 1094-1107.
  • Mommsen, Theodro. 1888. R misches Staatrecht. Leipzig: Hirszel.
  • Meier, Heinrich. 1995. Carl Schmitt & Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue. trans. J. Harvey Lomax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • McCormick, John P. 1997. Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Marin, Louis 1994. De la repr sentation. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Mansfield, Harvey C., Jr. 1971. “Hobbes and the Science of Indirect Government,” The American Political Science Review 65: 1 (March), pp. 97-110.
  • Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”,” Journal of Politics 61: 3 (August), pp 628-657.
  • Manin, Bernard. 1987. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation,” trans. Elly Stein & Jane Mansbridge. Political Theory 15: 3 (August), pp. 338-368.
  • Mackie, Gerry. 2009. “Schumpeter’s Leadership Democracy,” Political Theory 37: 1 (February), pp. 128-153.
  • Loewenstein, Karl. 1937. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights” I/II, American Political Science Review 51: 3/4 (June/August), 417-432, 638-658.
  • List, Christian, & Philip Pettit. 2011. Group Agency: The Possiblity, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lefort, Claude. 1986. Essais sur le politique: XIXe-xxe si cle. Paris: Seuil.
  • Laclau, Ernesto. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
  • Klein, Claude. 1999. ““The Eternal Constitution”-Contrasting Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt,” in eds. Dan Diner & Michael Stolleis, Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt: A Juxtaposition. Gerlingen: Bleicher, pp. 61-70.
  • Kennedy, Ellen. 1997. “Hostis not Inimicus: Toward a Theory of the Public in the Work of Carl Schmitt,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 10: 1 (January), pp. 35-47.
  • Kelsen, Hans. 1925. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Springer.
  • Kelly, Duncan. 2003. The State of the Political: Conceptions of Politics and the State in the Thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Franz Neumann. Oxford: Oxfrod University Press.
  • Keenan, Alan. 2003. Democracy in Question: Democratic Openness in a Time of Political Closure. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Kalyvas, Andreas. 2008. Democracy and the Politics of the Exrtraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Hannah Arendt. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kahn, Victoria. 2003. “Hamlet or Hecuba: Carl Schmitt’s Decision,” Representations 83 (Summer), pp. 67-96.
  • Jaume, Lucien. 1986. Hobbes et l’Etat rep sentatif moderne. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  • Ingram, James. 2006. “The Politics of Claude Lefort’s Political: Between Liberalism and Radical Democracy,” Thesis Eleven 87 (November), pp. 33-50.
  • Ifergan, Pini. 2010. “Cutting to the Chase: Carl Schmitt and Hans Blumenberg on Political Theology and Secularization,” New German Critique, 111: 37 (Fall), pp. 149-171.
  • Hofmann, Hasso. 1964. Legitimit t gegen Legalit t: Der Weg der politischen Philosophie Carl Schmitts. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan with Selected Variants from the Latin edition of 1668. ed. Edwin Curley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
  • Herzog, Annabel. 2009. “Hobbes and Corneille on Political Representation,” The European Legacy 14: 4, pp. 379-389.
  • Herf, Jeffrey. 1984. Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Habermas, J rgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Green, Jeffrey. 2009. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Garsten, Bryan. 2009. "Representative Government and Popular Sovereignty",ﾠPolitical Representation, eds. Ian Shapiro, Susan C. Stokes, Elisabeth Jean Wood, and Alexander S. Kirshner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90-110.
  • Friedrich, Carl J. 1958. “Authority, Reason, and Discretion,” in Authority: NOMOS I. ed. Carl J. Friedrich. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 28-48.
  • Fralin, Richard. 1978. Rousseau and Representation: A Study of the Development of His Concept of Political Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Forsyth, Murray. 1981. “Thomas Hobbes and The Constituent Power of the People,” Political Studies XXIX: 2, pp. 191-203.
  • Elster, Jon. 1998. “Introduction,” in ed. Jon Elster, Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-17.
  • Dunn, John. 1999. "Situating Democratic Political Accountability", in Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, eds. Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 329-344.
  • Dumouchel, Paul. 1996. ““Persona”: Reason and Representation in Hobbes’s Political Philosophy,” SubStance 25: 2, 68-80.
  • Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?,” The American Political Science Review 96: 4 (December), pp. 729-743.
  • Donzelot, Jacques. 1994. L'invention du social: Essai sur le d clin des passions politiques. Paris: Seuil.
  • Disch, Lisa. 2008. "The People as "Presupposition" of Representative Democracy: An Essay on the Political Theory of Pierre Rosanvallon", ﾠRedescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History, pp. 47-71.
  • Dewey, John. 1991. The Public and Its Problem. Chicago: Swallow Press.
  • Cristi, Renato. 1998. Carl Schmitt and Authoritarian Liberalism: Strong State, Free Economy. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
  • Cohen, Jean L., & Andrew Arato. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Clapp, L. 2006. “Propositional Attitude Ascription: Philosophical Aspects,” in eds. Alex Barber & Robert J. Stainton. Concise Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier. pp, 613-617.
  • Canovan. Margaret. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy,” Political Studies XLVII, pp. 2-16.
  • Burke, Edmund. 1999. The Portable Edmund Burke. ed. Isaac Kramnick. New York: Penguin.
  • Bull, Malcolm. 2005. “The Social and the Political,” South Atlantic Quarterly 104: 4 (Fall), pp. 675-692.
  • Brown, Mark B. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Brito Vieira, M nica. 2009. The Elements of Representation in Hobbes: Aesthetics, Theatre, Law, and Theology in the Construction of Hobbes’s Theory of the State. Leiden: Brill.
  • Brito Vieira, M nica, & David Runciman. 2008. Representation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bragagnolo, Celina Maria. 2011. “Secularization, History, and Political Theology: The Hans Blumenberg and Carl Schmitt Debate,” Journal of Philosophy of History 5, pp. 84-104.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. ed. John B. Thompson, trans. Gino Raymond & Matthew Adamson, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Blumenberg, Hans. 1996. Die Legitimit t der Neuzeit. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  • Beaud, Olivier. 1987. ““Repr sentation et Stellvertretung”: Sur une distinction de Carl Schmitt,” Droits 6, pp. 11-20.
  • Bailyn, Bernard. 1992. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Enlarged Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • B ckenf rde, Ernst-Wolfgang. 1997. “The Concept of the Political: A Key to Undetstanding Carl Schmitt’s Constitutional Theory,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 10: 1 (January), pp. 5-19.
  • Assmann, Jan. 2000. Herrschaft und Heil: Politische Theologie in Alt gypten, Israel und Europa. M chen: Hanser.
  • Arendt, Hannah. 1958. “What was Authority?” in NOMOS I: Authority. ed. Carl J. Friedrich, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Ankersmit, Frank R. 1996. Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy Beyond Fact and Value. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.