연구동향 분석
박사

대학의 암묵적 지식 이전 메커니즘에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Tacit Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms of Korean Universities

박검진 2016년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 대학의 암묵적 지식 이전 메커니즘에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Tacit Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms of Korean Universities' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • absorptive capacity
  • knowledge transfer
  • large companies. SMEs
  • tacit knowledge
  • technology transfer
  • 기술이전
  • 기술이전 경로
  • 기술이전 메커니즘
  • 상용화
  • 암묵적지식
  • 흡수역량
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
547 0

0.0%

' 대학의 암묵적 지식 이전 메커니즘에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Tacit Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms of Korean Universities' 의 참고문헌

  • 대학-산업계간 기술이전을 위한 기술이전 에이전트의 모델 및 역할
    문병근 조규갑 대한 산업 공학회, 추계학술대회 논문집, pp.409-412 [2000]
  • 광역경제권역별 선도산업 육성과 대학의 산학협력 특성화 분석
    박병무 이기종 국가정책연구, 제24권, 제1호 [2010]
  • 『질적연구방법론』
    신경림 이화여자대학교 출판부, p.86 [2004]
  • 「문화간호연구: 이론과 실제」
    조명옥 최영희 서울: 현문사 [2000]
  • “중소기업의 성공적인 기술이전 방안에 관한 연구”
    박순형 주석정 홍순구 한국 산업정보학회논문지 제15권 제1호 [2010]
  • “정성연구방법론과 사례연구” (Sharan B. Merriam 지움)
    강윤수 교우 사 [2005]
  • “우리나라 대학의 특허창출과 기술이전 성과에 영향을 주 는 요인 연구”
    김병근 박검진 조현정 산업재산권 제35호 [2011]
  • “대학 기술이전의 효율성에 관한 연구”
    한동성 고려대학교 박사학위논문, 20면 [2009]
  • “기술이전 성과와 결정요인에 관한 연구-기술이전센터를 중심으로
    안성조 이관률 이성근 한국지역개발학회지, 제17권 제3호, pp.31-50 [2005]
  • “기술 확보 수단으로서의 전략적 제휴에 관한 연구”
    석금경 서강대학교 경제대 학원 정보기술전공 석사학위 논문 [1994]
  • “근거이론적 방법의 이론화 논리에 대한 이해 : 한국행정학의 비맥락성과 방법론적 편향성 문제를 중심으로”
    권향원 최도림 일반논문 한국행정학보 제45권 제1호: pp.275~302 [2011]
  • “국내 공공연구기관들의 기술이전 효율성 분석”
    김병근 옥주영 기술혁신연구 17권 2호, 140면 [2009]
  • “공공연구기관의 기술이전 활성화 전략”
    이윤준 기술혁신연구 16권 1호 [2008]
  • “DEA 모형을 이용한 공공연구기관의 기술이전 효율성 분석에 관 한 연구”
    유왕진 현만석 Journal of the Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering Vol, 31, No.2, 97면 [2008]
  • ‘한국과 미국의 기술이전 제도 비교 연구: KAIST와 캘리 포니아대학교를 중심으로’
    김상태 홍운선 기술혁신학회지 제16권 2호, pp.444 ~475 [2013]
  • ‘중소기업의 오픈 이노베이션 모델’
    윤병운 이성주 기술혁신학회지 제13권 1호, pp.160-183 [2010]
  • ‘중소기업의 기술이전 장애요인: 사전적 고찰과 연구방향’
    임채윤 ie 매거진 17(4), 47-50 [2010]
  • ‘기업연구소의 효율적 사내 기술이전에 관한 사례 연구’
    박우용 한국과학기술원 석사학위 논문 [1996]
  • Von Hippel, E., The Source of Innovation, Cambridge: MIT Press, 19 88 Vossen, R. W., Research note—Relative strengths and weaknesses of small firms in innovation. International Small Business Journal, 16(3), pp.88 4, 19 98 Vrande V Van de et al., Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges, Technovation 29, pp.423- 7, 20 09 Weber, M., On Charisma and Institution Building. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ., 19 68 Wheelwright, P.E., The presocratics. New York: The Ossey Press
  • Tiwari, R. and S. Buse, Barriers to innovation in SMEs: Can the internationalization of R&D Mitigate their effects?, Proceedings of the first European conference on knowledge for growth: role amd dynamics of corporate R&D, Seville, Spain, October 9, 20 07 Tsang, E.W.K., The Implementation of Technology Transfer in Sino-foreign Joint Ventures. International Journal of Technology Management, 10,7/8, pp.757- 6, 19 95 Van de Ven, A., Central problems in the management of innovation, Management Science 32, pp.590-6 - Vincenti, W.G., Technological Knowledge without Science: The Innovation of Flush Riveting in American Airplanes, ca. 1930-ca.1950, the Society for the History of Technol y, 19
  • Thursby, J.G. and Kemp, S., Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing, Research Policy, pp.109- 4, 20
  • Thomas E. et al., knowledge diffusion in the U.S.Aerospace, chapter5, Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1997
  • Teece, D.J., The Market for Know-How and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology, Annuals of the American Association of Political and Social Sciences, November, pp.81-86, 1981
  • Teece, D.J., Technology by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How, The Economic Journal, vol.87, no. 346, Jun., pp.242-261, 1977
  • Teece, D.J., Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets, 1998
  • Teece, D, J., Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration collaboration, licensing and public policy, In D. J. Teece, The Competitive Challenge. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp.185-219, 1987
  • Szulanski, G., The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.82, No.1, pp.9-27, 2000
  • Stake, R.E. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1995
  • Spender, J.C., “Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm.”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, Special Issue: Knowledge and the Firm (Winter), pp.45-62, 1996
  • Skolimowski, H., The structure of thinking in technology. In C. Mitcham and R. Mackey (eds.). Philosophy and technology. New York: Free Press, pp.42-49, 197
  • Singer, C., Holmyard, E.J., and Hall, A.R. Hall, A History of Technology, 5 vols. London, 1954-58
  • Siegel, D.S. Waldman, D., and Link, A., Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study, Research Policy 32, pp.27-48, 2003
  • Shapley, D. and R. Roy, Lost at the Frontier: U.S. Science and Technology Policy Adrift. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press, 1985
  • Schwartz, D. G., Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management, IGI Global, 2006
  • Schmoch, U., "Interaction of Universities and Industrial Enterprises in Germany and the United States - a Comparison", Industry and Innovation, 6(1), pp.51-68, 1999
  • Schartinger, D., Schibany, A. & Gassler H., "Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria," Journal of Technology Transfe,. 26, pp.255-268, 2001
  • Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M.M. and Fr hlich, J., Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, pp.303–328, 2002
  • Samuelson, P.A., “Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, pp.350-356, 1955
  • Rogers, E.M., Y. Yin and J. Hoffmann, "Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. research universities", The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 12, pp.47-80, 2000
  • Rogers, E.M. et al., Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. Research Universities, Everett M. Rogers, Jing Yin, and Joern Hoffman, pp.47-80, 2000
  • Roessner, J.D., in press. Trchnology transfer. In: Hill, C. (Ed.), Science and Technology Policy in the US, A Time of Change. Longman, London.
  • Roessner, J.D., What companies want from the federal labs. Issues in Science and Technology 10 1., pp.37–42, 1993
  • Rip, A., “Science and Technology As Dancing Partners.” In Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age. P. Kroes and M. Bakker, eds, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.231-270, 1992
  • Richards, D. and Busch, P., Acquiring and Applying Contextualized Tacit Knowledge. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.179-190, 2003
  • Price, D. deS., The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovations, Res. Policy 13, pp.3-20, 1984
  • Powers, J.B., Commercializing Academic Research, Resource Effects on Performance of University Technology Transfer, The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 74, No.1, Jan/Feb, 2003
  • Porter, M.E., “How competitive forces shape strategy”, Harvard Business Review, 57(2), pp.137-145, 1979
  • Polanyi M., The Tacit Dimension, NewYork: Double day Anchor, 1966 Porter, M.E., Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press, New York, 1980
  • Pisano, The governance of innovation: Vertical integration and collaborative arrangements i n the biotechnology industry, R es. Policy 20. pp.237-249, 1991
  • Pennings, J. H., Harianto, F., Technology networking and innovation implementation, Organization Science, 3, pp.356-382, 1992
  • Peirce, C. S., Guessing, and “The Founding of Pragmatism” Hound and Horn: A Harvard Miscellany (Vol. II), 1929
  • Pavitt, K., What makes basic research economically useful?, Research Policy 20, pp.109-119, 1991
  • Paulin, D. and Suneson, K., Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Barriers–Three Blurry Terms in KM, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management Volume 10 Issue 1, 2012
  • Patton, M.Q., Qualitative Evaluation Methods. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1990
  • Parayil, G., Technological knowledge and technological change. Technology and Society, 13(2), pp.289-304, 1991
  • Owen-Smith, J. and W.W. Powell, Knowledge Networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillover in the boston biotechnology community, organization science vol.15,no.1, January-February, pp.5-21, 2004
  • Numata, J., Hane, K., Lei, B., Iwashita, Y., Knowledge discovery and sharing in an information system. PICMET `97: Portland International Conference on Management and Technology pp.713-716, 1997
  • Nooteboom, B., Innovation and Diffusion in Small Firms: Theory and Evidence, Small Business Economics, October, Vol.6, Issue 5, pp.327-347, 1994
  • Nonaka, I., "Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation", Organization Science, Vol.Noh, J.B. et al., A case-based reasoning approach to cognitive map-driven tacit knowledge management, Expert Systems with Application 19, pp.249-259, 20005, No.1, February, 1994
  • Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, 1995
  • Nelson, R. and S. Winter, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap, Cambridge, MA, 1982
  • Narula, R., R&D collaboration by SMEs: New opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation. Technovation, 24(2), pp.153–161, 2001
  • Narin, F. and Olivastro, D., Status report: Linkage between technology and science. Research Policy, 21(3), pp.237-249, 1992
  • Mowery, D.C. et al., Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17(Winter Special Issue), pp.77-91, 1996
  • Mowery, D., International Collaborative Ventures in U. S. Manufacturing, 1900-1940, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 1988 163) Dougherty, V., Industrial and Commercial Training, Volumn 31. Number 7. pp.262-266, 1999
  • Morse, J.M., Critical issues in qualitative research methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994
  • Morrissey, M.T. and S. Almonacid, “Rethinking technology transfer”, Journal of Food Engineering, 67: pp.135-145, 2005
  • Miller P., Mobilising the Power of What You Know. London: Random House, 1998
  • Miles, M.B, and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1994
  • Meyer-Krahmer, F. and Schmoch, U., Science-based technologies: university– industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27, pp.835–851, 1998
  • Merriam, S.B. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988
  • Markman et al., Sidestepping the Ivory Tower: Rent Appropriations through Bypassing of U.S. Universities. Mimeo McKeon, R., Introduction to Aristotle (New York, 1947), p.427.
  • Maitland, A., Management of Knowledge Management: Lessons can be learned Failed Attempts to Capture and Use Employees` Knowledge, Management and Technology, The Financial Times, 1999
  • Macpherson, A. and M. Ziolkowski, The role of university-based industrial extension services in the business performance of small manufacturing firms: case-study evidence from Western New York, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, Vol.17, Issue 6, 2005
  • Liyanage, C., Elhag, T., Ballal, T. and Li, Q. P., Knowledge communication and translation- a knowledge transfer model, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol 3, No.3, pp.118-131, 2009
  • Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., and Bozeman, B., An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer, ICC (2007) 16 (4): pp.641-655. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm020, First published online: June 24, 2007
  • Link, A. L., J. Rees, Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D. Small Bus. Econom. 2, pp.25-31, 1990
  • Li-Hua, R., From Technology Transfer to Knowledge Transfer-A Study of International Joint Venture Projects in China, Presented at the 2003 International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT) Conference, Nancy, France, 2003
  • Lee, P., Transcending the tacit dimension: Patents, Relationships, and Organizational Integration in Technology Transfer, UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 287, March, 2012
  • Learned, E.R. et al., Business Policy: Text and Cases. Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1965
  • Layton, E.T., Technology as Knowledge, Technology and Culture, Jan 1, 1974
  • Law, J. and M. Callon, “Engineering and Sociology in a Military Aircraft Project: A Network of Analysis of Technological Change.” Social Problems 35: pp.115-142, 1988
  • Laursen, K. and A. Salter, Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.27, No.2, pp.131-150, 2006
  • Latour, B., Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987
  • Langrish, J. et al., Wealth From Knowledge: A Study of Innovation in Industry. New York, NY: John Wiley, 1972
  • Landies, D., The creation of knowledge and technique: Today`s task and yesterday`s experience. Deadalis, 109 (1), 1980
  • Lam, A., Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework, Organization Studies, pp.487-513, 2000
  • Koyre Alexandre, Du monde de I`a peu pres a I`univers de la precision, Critique 4, no.28, 1948
  • Kogut, B., Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), pp.319-332, 1988
  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U., Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative, and Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology, Organization Science, Vol.3, No.3, Focused Issue: Management of Technology Aug, pp.383-397, 1992
  • Kline, B. “A Case Study of a Return-to-Industry Program: An Inservice Approach for Vocational Instructors at a Two-Year Post-Secondary Institution.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Vocational Education, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1981
  • Katsoulakos, Y. and D. Ulph, Endogenous spillovers and the performance of Research Joint Ventures Journal of Industrial Economics, 3 , pp. 333–357, 1998
  • Jonsson, A., A transnational perspective on knowledge sharing: lessons learned from IKEA`s entry into Russis, China and Japan, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol 18, No.1, pp.17-44, 2008
  • Jones, M. and Jain, R., “Technology transfer for SMEs”: Challenges and barriers“, International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, Vol.1, Nos 1/2: pp.146-162, 2002
  • Johnson, H. T. and R. S. Kaplan, Relevance Lost, Harvard University School Press, Boston, MA, 1987
  • Jaeschke, R., Guyatt, G.H., and Sackett, D.L., Users` guides to the medical literature Ⅲ. How to use an article about a diagnostic test: B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA, 271: 703-7, 1994
  • Itami, H. and Roehl, T.W., Mobilizing Invisible Assets, Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA, 1987
  • Hutchins, E., Organizing work by adjustment, Organization Science, 2, pp.14-39, 1991
  • Huston, L. and Sakkab, N., Connect and Develop: Inside Procter & Gamble`s New for Innovation, Harvard Business Review, March, 2006
  • Holton, J. A.. The Coding Process and Its Challenge. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp.265-290, 2007
  • Hindel, B. Technology in early America. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1966
  • Hicks, D.M., P.A. Isard and B.R. Martin, "A Morphology of Japanese and European Corporate Research Networks", Research Policy, 25, pp.359-378, 1995
  • Herschbach, D.R., Technology as Knowledge: Implications for Instruction, vol.7, 1995
  • Herliana, S., Regional innovation cluster for small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A Triple Helix Concept, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 169, pp.151-160, 2015
  • Hedlund, G. and Nonaka, I., Models of knowledge management in the West and Japan, Implementing Strategic Processes: Change, Learning, and co-operation, pp.117-144, 1993
  • Hansen, M., The search transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, pp.82-111, 1999
  • Hansen M. T, Nohria, N., and Tierney, T., Tierney, What`s your strategy for managing knowledge?, Harvard Business Review, March-April, 1999
  • Hall, R.A., On knowing, and knowing how to ..... In A.R. Hall and N.Smith(eds.), History of technology. Third annual volume. London: Mansell, 1978
  • Hall, R., A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabilities to Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp.607-618, 1993
  • Hall, A.R., The Scholar and the Craftsman in the Scientific Revolution, in Critical Problems in the History of Science, p.17, 1959
  • Grosse, R., International Technology Transfer in Services, Journal of International Business Studies, Fourth Quarter, 1996
  • Grosse, R., International Technology Transfer in Services, Journal of International Business Studies 27:782, 1996
  • Grimpe, C. and Hussinger K., Formal and informal knowledge and Technology Transfer from Academia to Industry: Complementarity Effects and Innovation Performance, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 20, Issue 8, 2013
  • Grant, R.M., Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of The Firm, Strategy Management Journal, Vol.17 (Winter Special Issue), 109-122, 1996
  • Grant, R.M. and Baden-Fuller, C., 'A KNOWLEDGE-BASED THEORY OF INTER-FIRM COLLABORATION', Best Paper Proceedings 1995, Academy of Management, pp.17-21, 1995
  • Grant, E.B. and Gregory, M.J., Tacit knowledge, the life cycle and international manufacturing transfer. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 92., pp.149–161, 1997
  • Goldhor, R.S. and Lund, R.T., University-to-industry advanced technology transfer, Research Policy 12, pp.121-152, 1983.
  • Goldfarb, B. and Henrekson, M., Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property, Research Policy 32, pp.639–658, 2003
  • Glynn. M. A., Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligence to innovation, Academy of Management Review 21/4: 1081-1111
  • Galbraith, C. S., Transferring core manufacturing technologies in high technology firms, California Management Review, 32(4), pp.56-70, 1990
  • Friedman, J. and Silberman, J., “University Technology: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matters?”, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.28, pp.17-30, 2003
  • Feibleman, J.K., Pure science, applied science and technology: An attempt at definitions. In C. Mitcham and R. Mackey. Philosophy and technology. New York: Free Press, 1972
  • Faulkner, W. and Senker, J., Making sense of diversity: public–private sector research linkage in three technologies. Research Policy, 23, pp.673–695, 1994
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., and Graebner, M. E., Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges, Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): pp.25-32, 2007
  • Dove, R., Agile knowledge transfer: Reusable, reconfigurable, scalable, Production, 108, pp.16-17, 1996
  • Derek J. de Solla Price, Is Technology Historically Independent of Science? Technology & Culture (Summer) 6(3): pp.553-578, 1965
  • Debackere, K. and R. Veugelers, The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links, Research Policy 34, pp.321–342, 2005
  • Daumas, M., Histoire general des techniques, 3 vols. (Paris, 1962-68); English translation of first two volumes by Elileen B. .Hennessy, A History of Technology and Invention, New York, 1969
  • Darr, E.D. and Kurtzberg, T.R., An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.82, No.1, pp.28-44, 2000
  • Colyvas, J. et al., How Do University Inventions Get into Practice?, Management Science, Vol. 48, No. 1, Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer Jan. pp.61-72, 2002
  • Collins, H. M., The Structure of Knowledge, Social Research, Vol. 60, No.1, Spring, 1993
  • Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P., Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), pp.1–23, 2002
  • Cohen, W.M. et al., Links and Impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D Management Science vol.48, No.1, January, pp.1-23, 2002
  • Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., “Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D”, Economic Journal 99: September: pp.569-596, 1989
  • Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, No.1, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, pp.128-152, 1990
  • Cohen, W.M. and Klepper, S., A reprise of size and R&D. Econom. J. 106, July, pp.925-951, 1996
  • Cohen, M.D. and L.S. Sproull., Organizational Learning. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1996
  • Chein, I. “Appendix: An Introduction to Sampling.” In L. H. Kidder (ed.), Selltiz, Wrightsman & Cook`s Research Methods in Social Relations. (4th ed.) Austin, Tex.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1981
  • Charmaz, K., Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006
  • Chapple, W. et al., Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence, Research Policy 34, pp.369-384, 2005
  • Carr, R., doing technology transfer in federal laboratories (part 1), Technology Transfer spring-summer, pp.8-23, 1992
  • Carayannis E.G. et al., “Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government- university-industry(GUI) R&D Partnerships in the US, Germany and France”, Technovation, 20, pp.477-488, 2000
  • Buratti, N. and Penco, L., Assisted technology transfer to SMEs: Lessons from an exemplary case, Technovation, 21: pp.31-43, 2001 Bush, V., Endless Horizons (Washington, D.C.), pp.52-53, 1947
  • Bucy, An Analysis of Export Control of U.S. Technology- a DOD Perspective. A report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Export of U.S. Technology, Office of DDR&E, Washington, DC, Feb, 1976.
  • Bryant, A., Re-grounding Grounded Theory. The Journal of Information Technology Theory and, Application, 4(1): pp.25-42, 2002
  • Brooks, H.“National Science Policy and Technology Transfer, ”Proceedings of a Conference on Technology Transfer and Innovation, Washington, D.C.: NSF, 1966
  • Brooke, M., Selling management services contracts in international business. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1985
  • Bozeman, B., Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory, Research Policy 29, pp.627-655, 2000
  • Bercovitz, J., Entrepreneurial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31: pp.175–188, 2006
  • Bercovitz, J. and Feldmann, M., Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31: pp.175–188, 2006.
  • Becker, H.S. “Social Observation and Social Case Studies.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Vol.11. New York: Crowell, 1968
  • Bania et al., Universities and the startup of new companies: Can we generalize from route 128 and silicon valley?, JSTOR, pp.761-766, 1993
  • Baldini, N. et al., Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002, Research Policy 35, pp.518–532, 2006
  • Attewell, P., Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning- the Case of Business Computing, Organization Science, Vol 3, No.1, pp.1-19, 1992
  • Astley, W. G., and Zammuto, R. F.. Organization Science, Managers, and Language Games. Organization Science, 3(4): pp.443-460, 1992
  • Arrow, K., “Classificatory Notes on the Production and Transmission of Technological Knowledge.”, American Economic Review; Papers and Proceedings, vol.52, May, pp.29-35, 1969
  • Arora, A., Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and The Market for Know-how, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.4, Issue 1, 1995
  • Argote, L. and Ingram, P., "Knowledge transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1): pp.150–169, 2000
  • Amesse F. and Cohendet P, Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy, Research Policy, 30, pp.1459-1478, 2001
  • Allen, T.J. et al., technology transfer as a function of position in the spectrum from research through development to technical services, Academy of Management Journal, vol.22. no.4, pp.694-708, 1979
  • Adams, J.D., Chiang, E.P. and Starkey, K., Industry–university cooperative research centers. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), pp.73–86, 2001
  • Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B, and Feldman, M.P., R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Revze. Rev. Econom. Statist. 76, , pp.336-340, 1994
  • Acs et al., High Technology Employment, wages and university R&D spillovers: Evidence from US cities, Econ. Innov. Techn., Vol.8, pp.57-78, 1999
  • Abidi, S.S.R. et al., A Knowledge Creation Info-Structure to Acquire and Crystallize the Tacit Knowledge of Health-Care Experts, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Vol.9, No.2, June, 2005
  • 66 Willoughby, K.W., Technology choice a critique of the appropriate technology movement. Boulder and San Francisco: Weview Press
  • 66 White, L., “Pumps and Pendula: Galileo and Technology,” in Galileo Reappraised, Carlo L.Golino (Berkeley and Los Angeles pp.99-100