박사

Interactive Multiobjective Optimization Approach to Product and Process Design

논문상세정보
' Interactive Multiobjective Optimization Approach to Product and Process Design' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • Interactive Approach
  • Multiple Response Optimization
  • Product and Process Design
  • multi-objective optimization
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
31 0

0.0%

' Interactive Multiobjective Optimization Approach to Product and Process Design' 의 참고문헌

  • Zionts, S. and Wallenius, J. (1976). An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Management Science, 22, 652- 663.
  • Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision-making, McGraw-Hill, New-York. Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American statistical Association, 57, 348-368.
  • Wu, F.-C. and Chyu, C.-C. (2004). Optimization of correlated multiple quality characteristics robust design using principal component analysis. Journal of manufacturing systems, 23, 134-143.
  • Wu, F.-C. (2005). Optimization of correlated multiple quality characteristics using desirability function. Quality Engineering, 17, 119-126.
  • Wierzbicki, A.P. (1981). A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 190, Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
  • Vining, G.G. and Myers, R.H. (1990). Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 22, 38-45.
  • Vining, G.G. (1998). A compromise approach to multiresponse optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 309-313.
  • Tversky, A. and Thaler, R.H. (1990). Anomalies: preference reversals. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 201-211.
  • Tang, L. and Xu, K. (2002). A unified approach for dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 34, 437-447.
  • Taguchi, G. (1986). Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo.
  • Su, C.-T. and Tong, L.-I. (1997). Multi-response robust design by principal component analysis. Total Quality Management, 8, 409-416.
  • Steuer, R.E. (1986). Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation, and applications, Wiley, New York.
  • Shin, W.S. and Ravindran, A. (1991). Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey I—Continuous case. Computers & Operations Research, 18, 97-114.
  • Shin, S. and Cho, B.R. (2009). Studies on a bi-objective robust design optimization problem. IIE Transactions, 41, 957-968.
  • Salmasnia, A., Kazemzadeh, R.B. and Niaki, S.T.A. (2012). An approach to optimize correlated multiple responses using principal component analysis and desirability function. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 62, 835-846.
  • Sadagopan, S. and Ravindran, A. (1986). Interactive algorithms for multiple criteria nonlinear programming problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 25, 247-257.
  • Roy, A. and Wallenius, J. (1992). Nonlinear multiple objective optimization: An algorithm and some theory. Mathematical Programming, 55, 235-249.
  • Rees, L.P., Clayton, E.R. and Taylor, B.W. (1985). Solving multiple response simulation models using modified response surface methodology within a lexicographic goal programming framework. IIE Transactions, 17, 47-57.
  • Plante, R.D. (2001). Process capability: a criterion for optimizing multiple response product and process design. IIE Transactions, 33, 497-509.
  • Plante, R.D. (1999). Multicriteria models for the allocation of design parameter targets. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 98-112.
  • Pignatiello Jr, J.J. (1993). Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering. IIE Transactions, 25, 5-15.
  • Pearson, K. (1901). Principal components analysis. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 6, 559.
  • Park, K.S. and Shin, D.E. (2012). Interactive multiobjective optimization approach to the input–output design of opening new branches. European Journal of Operational Research, 220, 530-538.
  • Park, K.S. and Lee, P. (2016). Compounding problem in an interactive multiple objective optimization method. European Journal of Operational Research, 248, 1132-1135.
  • Park, K.S. and Kim, K.-J. (2005). Optimizing multi-response surface problems: how to use multi-objective optimization techniques. IIE Transactions, 37, 523-532.
  • Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C. and Anderson-Cook, C.M. (2009). Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Myers, R.H. and Carter, W.H. (1973). Response surface techniques for dual response systems. Technometrics, 15, 301-317.
  • Montgomery, D.C. and Bettencourt, V.M. (1977). Multiple response surface methods in computer simulation. Simulation, 29, 113-121.
  • Mollaghasemi, M. and Evans, G.W. (1994). Multicriteria design of manufacturing systems through simulation optimization. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 24, 1407-1411.
  • Miettinen, K., M kel , M.M. and M nnikk , T. (1998). Optimal control of continuous casting by nondifferentiable multiobjective optimization. Computational Optimization and Applications, 11, 177-194.
  • Miettinen, K. and M kel , M.M. (2006). Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 170, 909-922.
  • Miettinen, K. and M kel , M.M. (2000). Interactive multiobjective optimization system WWW-NIMBUS on the Internet. Computers & Operations Research, 27, 709-723.
  • Miettinen, K. and M kel , M.M. (1997). Interactive method NIMBUS for nondifferentiable multiobjective optimization problems, in Multicriteria Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 310-319.
  • Miettinen, K. and M kel , M. (1995). Interactive bundle-based method for nondifferentiable multiobjeective optimization: nimbus. Optimization, 34, 231-246.
  • Miettinen, K. (1999). Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Lin, D.K. and Tu, W. (1995). Dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 27, 34-39.
  • Liao, H.-C. (2006). Multi-response optimization using weighted principal component. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27, 720-725.
  • Lee, D.-H., Kim, K.-J. and K ksalan, M. (2012). An interactive method to multiresponse surface optimization based on pairwise comparisons. IIE Transactions, 44, 13-26.
  • Lee, D.-H., Kim, K.-J. and K ksalan, M. (2011). A posterior preference articulation approach to multiresponse surface optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 210, 301-309.
  • Lee, D.-H., Jeong, I.-J. and Kim, K.-J. (2009). A posterior preference articulation approach to dual-response-surface optimization. IIE Transactions, 42, 161-171.
  • Lee, D.-H. and Kim, K.-J. (2012). Interactive weighting of bias and variance in dual response surface optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 5900-5906.
  • Kovach, J. and Cho, B. (2008). Development of a multidisciplinary– multiresponse robust design optimization model. Engineering Optimization, 40, 805-819.
  • Korhonen, P.J. and Laakso, J. (1986). A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 277-287.
  • Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H. and Wallenius, J. (1992). Multiple criteria decision support-A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 63, 361- 375.
  • Ko, Y.-H., Kim, K.-J. and Jun, C.-H. (2005). A new loss function-based method for multiresponse optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 37, 50- 59.
  • Kim, Y.J. and Cho, B.R. (2002). Development of priority-based robust design. Quality Engineering, 14, 355-363.
  • Kim, K.J. and Lin, D.K. (2000). Simultaneous optimization of mechanical properties of steel by maximizing exponential desirability functions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 49, 311-325.
  • Kim, K.-J. and Lin, D.K. (2006). Optimization of multiple responses considering both location and dispersion effects. European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 133-145.
  • Kim, K.-J. and Lin, D.K. (1998). Dual response surface optimization: a fuzzy modeling approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 1-10.
  • Khuri, A. and Conlon, M. (1981). Simultaneous optimization of multiple responses represented by polynomial regression functions. Technometrics, 23, 363-375.
  • Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.
  • Kaliszewski, I. (2004). Out of the mist––towards decision-maker-friendly multiple criteria decision making support. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 293-307.
  • K ksoy, O. (2008). A nonlinear programming solution to robust multi-response quality problem. Applied mathematics and computation, 196, 603-612.
  • K ksoy, O. (2006). Multiresponse robust design: Mean square error (MSE) criterion. Applied mathematics and computation, 175, 1716-1729.
  • K ksoy, O. (2005). Dual response optimization: the desirability approach. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 12, 335-342.
  • K ksalan, M. and Plante, R.D. (2003). Interactive multicriteria optimization for multiple-response product and process design. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 5, 334-347.
  • Jeong, I.-J. and Kim, K.-J. (2009). An interactive desirability function method to multiresponse optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 195, 412-426.
  • Jeong, I.-J. and Kim, K.-J. (2005). D-STEM: a modified step method with desirability function concept. Computers & Operations Research, 32, 3175-3190.
  • Jeong, I.-J. and Kim, K.-J. (2003). Interactive desirability function approach to multi-response surface optimization. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 10, 205-217.
  • Jeong, I., Kim, K. and Chang, S.Y. (2005). Optimal weighting of bias and variance in dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 37, 236-247.
  • Hwang, C.-L. and Masud, A.S.M. (1979). Multiple objective decision making— methods and applications (a state-of-the-art survey), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 164, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Hu, Z., Cai, M. and Liang, H.-H. (2008). Desirability function approach for the optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of saikosaponins from Radix Bupleuri. Separation and Purification Technology, 61, 266-275.
  • Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of educational psychology, 24, 417.
  • Greene, W.H. (2003). Econometric analysis, Pearson Education India, Delhi. Harrington, E. (1965). The desirability function. Industrial quality control, 21, 494-498.
  • Govindaluri, S.M. and Cho, B.R. (2007). Robust design modeling with correlated quality characteristics using a multicriteria decision framework. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 32, 423-433.
  • Geoffrion, A.M., Dyer, J.S. and Feinberg, A. (1972). An interactive approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to the operation of an academic department. Management Science, 19, 357-368.
  • Gardiner, L.R. and Steuer, R.E. (1994). Unified interactive multiple objective programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 74, 391-406.
  • Fogliatto, F.S. and Albin, S.L. (2000). Variance of predicted response as an optimization criterion in multiresponse experiments. Quality Engineering, 12, 523-533.
  • Engau, A. and Wiecek, M.M. (2008). Interactive coordination of objective decompositions in multiobjective programming. Management Science, 54, 1350-1363.
  • Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. (1981). Applied regression analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Derringer, G. and Suich, R. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 12, 214-219.
  • Del Castillo, E., Montgomery, D.C. and McCarville, D.R. (1996). Modified desirability functions for multiple response optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 337-345.
  • Del Castillo, E. and Montgomery, D. (1993). A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. Journal of Quality Technology, 25, 199-204.
  • Datta, S., Nandi, G. and Bandyopadhyay, A. (2009). Application of entropy measurement technique in grey based Taguchi method for solution of correlated multiple response optimization problems: A case study in welding. Journal of manufacturing systems, 28, 55-63.
  • Copeland, K.A. and Nelson, P.R. (1996). Dual response optimization via direct function minimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 331-336.
  • Box, G.E., Hunter, W.G. and Hunter, J.S. (1978). Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Bhamare, S.S., Yadav, O.P. and Rathore, A. (2009). A hybrid quality loss function–based multi-objective design optimization approach. Quality Engineering, 21, 277-289.
  • Bera, S. and Mukherjee, I. (2013). An integrated approach based on principal component and multivariate process capability for simultaneous optimization of location and dispersion for correlated multiple response problems. Quality Engineering, 25, 266-281.
  • Benayoun, R., De Montgolfier, J., Tergny, J. and Laritchev, O. (1971). Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (STEM). Mathematical Programming, 1, 366-375.
  • Bazaraa, M.S., Sherali, H.D. and Shetty, C.M. (2013). Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Barton, R.R. and Tsui, K.-L. (1991). Multivariate yield maximization using CAD/CAE models: efficient approximations based on mean and variance. Design Theory and Methodology, 31, 31-35.
  • Antony, J. (2000). Multi‐response optimization in industrial experiments using taguchi's quality loss function and principal component analysis. Quality and reliability engineering international, 16, 3-8.