연구동향 분석
박사

정보기술 역량, 기업 민첩성 그리고 기업 성과 간의 관계: 조직 지원 구조와 환경적 요인의 조절역할 = Relationship between Information Technology (IT) Capability, Firm Agility, and Firm performance: The Moderating Role of Organizational Support Structure and Environmental Factors

김근아 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 정보기술 역량, 기업 민첩성 그리고 기업 성과 간의 관계: 조직 지원 구조와 환경적 요인의 조절역할 = Relationship between Information Technology (IT) Capability, Firm Agility, and Firm performance: The Moderating Role of Organizational Support Structure and Environmental Factors' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 기업 민첩성
  • 기업성과
  • 동태적 역량 이론
  • 자원기반이론
  • 정보기술 역량
  • 조직 지원 구조
  • 환경적 요인
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
831 0

0.0%

' 정보기술 역량, 기업 민첩성 그리고 기업 성과 간의 관계: 조직 지원 구조와 환경적 요인의 조절역할 = Relationship between Information Technology (IT) Capability, Firm Agility, and Firm performance: The Moderating Role of Organizational Support Structure and Environmental Factors' 의 참고문헌

  • 성공적인 신사업 추진을 위한 조직민첩성 제고 방안 (SERI 연구보고서)
    김재원 김치풍 주세영 삼성경제연구소 [2012]
  • 기업 내적 IT 자원이 기업 민첩성과 성과에 미치는 영향: 관리적 IT 능력과 경영진 존재의 조절효과
    김근아 김상현 Information Systems Review, 15(3), 39-69 [2013]
  • zsomer, A., Calantone, R. J., & Di Bonetto, A. (1997). What makes firms more innovative? A look at organizational and environmental factors. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 12(6), 400-416.
  • van Oosterhout, M., Waarts, E., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2006). Change factors requiring agility and implications for IT. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 132-145.
  • Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.
  • Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557-1576.
  • Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61-84.
  • Zhang, M., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2008). Unpacking the effect of IT capability on the performance of export-focused SMEs: A report from China. Information Systems Journal, 18(4), 357-380.
  • Zhang, M. J., & Lado, A. A. (2001). Information systems and competitive advantage: A competency-based view. Technovation, 21(3), 147-156.
  • Zhang, M. J. (2007). IS support for top managers' dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business and Management, 13(1), 57-77.
  • Zain, M., Rose, R. C., Abdullah, I., & Masrom, M. (2005). The relationship between information technology acceptance and organizational agility in Malaysia. Information & Management, 42(6), 829-839.
  • Zahra, S. A., & Garvis, D. M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 469-492.
  • Zaheer, A., & Zaheer, S. (1997). Catching the wave: Alertness, responsiveness, and market influence in global electronic networks. Management Science, 43(11), 1493-1509.
  • Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2), 33–43.
  • Yayla, A. A., & Hu, Q. (2012). The impact of IT-business strategic alignment on firm performance in a developing country setting: Exploring moderating roles of environmental uncertainty and strategic orientation. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(4), 373-387.
  • Wu, S. P-J., Straub, D. W., & Liang, T.-P. (2015). How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: Insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 497-518.
  • Wold, H. (1989). Introduction to the second generation of multivariate analysis. In H. Wold (Ed.), Theoretical empiricism (pp. vii-xi). New York: Paragon House.
  • Wold, H. (1985). Partial least squares. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 581-591). New York: Wiley.
  • Wold, H. (1982). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In K. G. J reskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction, Part 2 (pp. 1-54). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Press.
  • Wixom, B. H,, & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 17-41.
  • Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic ManagementJournal, 24(10), 991-995.
  • Wilcocks, L., Feeny, D., & Olson, N. (2006). Implementing core IS capabilities: Feeny-Wilcocks IT governance and management framework revisited. European Management Journal, 24(1), 28-37.
  • Wheeler, B. C. (2002). NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 125-146.
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource?based view of the firm. Strategic managementjournal, 5(2), 171-180.
  • Werner, S., Brouthers, L. E., & Brouthers, K. D. (1996). International risk and perceived environmental uncertainty: The dimensionality and internal consistency of Miller's measure. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3), 571-587.
  • Weill, P., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 57-65.
  • Weill, P., & Ross, J. (2004). IT governance: How top managers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Wang, N., Liang, H., Zhong, W., Xue, Y., & Xiao, J. (2012). Resource structuring or capability building? An empirical study of the business value of information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(2), 325-367.
  • Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107-142.
  • Venkatraman, N., & Henderson, J. C. (1998). Real strategies for virtual organizing. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 33-48.
  • Venkatesh, V., Zhang, X., & Sykes, T. A. (2011). "Doctors do too little technology": A longitudinal field study of an electronic healthcare system implementation. Information Systems Research, 22(3), 523-546.
  • Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260.
  • Vaast, E., & Walsham, G. (2009). Trans-situated learning: supporting a network of practice with an information infrastructure. Information Systems Research, 20(4), 547-564.
  • Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (1993). Customer intimacy and other value disciplines. Harvard Business Review, 71(1), 84-93.
  • Tiwana, A., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). The antecedents of information systems development capability in firms: A knowledge integration perspective. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems, USA, 246-258.
  • Tiwana, A., & Konsynski, B. (2010). Complementarities between organizational IT architecture and governance structure. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 288-304.
  • Tippins, M. J., & Sohi, R. S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link?. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 745-761.
  • Thompson, C. A., Kopelman, R. E., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1992). Putting all one's eggs in the same basket: A comparison of commitment and satisfaction among self-and organizationally employed men. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 738-743.
  • Teo, T. S. H., & King, W. R. (1997). Integration between business planning and information systems planning: An evolutionary-contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1), 185-214.
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature andmicrofoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. StrategicManagement Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
  • Tarafdar, M., & Gordon, S. R. (2007). Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(4), 353-392.
  • Tapscott, D., Ticoll, D., & Lowy, A. (2000). Digital capital: Harnessing the power of business webs. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Tanriverdi, H. (2005). Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 311-334.
  • Tan, B., Pan, S. L., Lu, X., & Huang, L. (2015). The role of IS capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: The digital ecosystem strategy of Alibaba.com. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(4), 248-280.
  • Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 463-486.
  • Tallon, P. P. (2008). Inside the adaptive enterprise: An information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility. Information Technology and Management, 9(1), 21-36.
  • Sykes, T. A., Venkatesh, V., & Gosain, S. (2009). Model of acceptance with peer support: A social network perspective to understand employees' system use. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 371-393.
  • Sykes, T. A. (2015). Support structures and their impacts on employee outcomes: A longitudinal field study of an enterprise system implementation. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 473-495.
  • Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288-297.
  • Strong, D. M., & Volkoff, O. (2010). Understanding organization–-enterprise system fit: A path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 731-756.
  • Stoel, M. D., & Muhanna, W. A. (2009). IT capabilities and firm performance: A contingency analysis of the role of industry and IT capability type. Information & Management, 46(3), 181-189.
  • Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W. J., & Ndofor, H. (2001). Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 315-361). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273-292.
  • Sila, I. (2010). Do organisational and environmental factors moderate the effects of Internet-based interorganisational systems on firm performance?. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(5), 581-600.
  • Sharma, R., & Yetton, P. (2007). The contingent effects of training, technical complexity, and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 219-238.
  • Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (1999). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1–2), 7-22.
  • Shapiro, C., & Varian, R. H. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Setia, P., Sambamurthy, V., & Closs, D. J. (2008). Realizing business value of agile IT applications: Antecedents in the supply chain networks. Information Technology and Management, 9(1), 5-19.
  • Seddon, P. B., Calvert, C., & Yang, S. (2010), A multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 305-328.
  • Saraf, N., Langdon, C. S., & Gosain, S. (2007). IS application capabilities and relational value in interfirm partnerships. Information Systems Research, 18(3), 320-339.
  • Santhanam, R., & Hartono, E. (2003). Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 125-153.
  • Sampler, J. L. (1998). Redefining industry structure for the information age. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 343-355.
  • Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237-263.
  • Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1997). At the heart of success: Organization-wide management competencies. In C. Sauer & P. Yetton (Eds.), Steps to the future: Fresh thinking on the management of IT-based organizational transformation (pp. 143-164). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Saeed, K. A., Malhotra, M. K., & Grover, V. (2005). Examining the impact of interorganizational systems on process efficiency and sourcing leverage in buyer-supplier dyads. Decision Sciences, 36(3), 365-396.
  • Rueda-Manzanares, A., Arag n-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2008). The influence of stakeholders on the environmental strategy of service firms: The moderating effects of complexity, uncertainty and munificence. British Journal of Management, 19(2), 185-203.
  • Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., & Goodhue, D. L. (1996). Develop Long-TermCompetitiveness through IT Assets. Sloan Management Review, 38(1),31-42.
  • Ross, J. W. (2003). Creating a strategic IT architecture competency: Learning in stages, MIS Quarterly Executive, 2(1), 31-43.
  • Roberts, N., & Grover, V. (2012). Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm's customer agility and competitive activity: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(4), 231-269.
  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 M3 (beta). Hamburg, Germany: University of Hamburg. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.de/
  • Rindova, V. P., & Kotha, S. (2001). Continuous "morphing": Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1263-1280.
  • Richardson, S., Banks, M. S., Kettinger, W. J., & Quintana, Y. (2014). IT and agility in the social enterprise: A case study of St Jude children's research hospital's "Cure4Kids" IT-platform for international outreach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 1-32.
  • Rettig, C. (2007). The trouble with enterprise software. Sloan Management Review, 49(1), 21-27.
  • Ray, G., Muhanna, W. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005), Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 625-652.
  • Ravishankar, M. N., Pan, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (2011). Examining the strategic alignment and implementation success of a KMS: A subculture-based multilevel analysis. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 39-59.
  • Ravichandran, T., & Lertwongsatien, C. (2005). Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 237-276.
  • Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225-246.
  • Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433.
  • Radhakrishnan, A., Zu, X., & Grover, V. (2008). A process-oriented perspective on differential business value creation by information technology: An empirical investigation. Omega, 36(6), 1105-1125.
  • Puhakainen, P., & Siponen, M. (2010). Improving employees' compliance through information systems security training: An action research study. MIS Quarterly, 34(4). 757-778.
  • Prieto, I. M., & Easterby-Smith, M. (2006). Dynamic capabilities and the role of organizational knowledge: An exploration. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(5), 500-510.
  • Prahalad, C. K. (2009). In volatile times, agility rules. Business Week, September 21, 80.
  • Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G.(1990). "The Core Competence of the Corporation". HarvardBusiness Review. 68(3), 79-91.
  • Powell, T. C., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 375-405.
  • Ping, R. A., Jr. (1996). Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 166-175.
  • Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2005). Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 747-776.
  • Peppard, J., & Ward, J. (2005). Unlocking sustained business value from IT investments. California Management Review, 48(1), 52-70.
  • Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2010). The "third hand": IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 443-471.
  • Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198-227.
  • Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120-131.
  • Nunnally J. C.(1978), "Psychometric Theory”, 2nd ed, New York:McGraw-Hill.
  • Novak, S., & Eppinger, S. D. (2001). Sourcing by design: product complexity and thesupply chain. Management science, 47(1), 189-204.
  • Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation?. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245-1264.
  • Newkirk, H. E., & Lederer, A., L., (2006b). The effectiveness of strategic information systems planning under environmental uncertainty. Information & Management, 43(4), 481-501.
  • Newkirk, H. E., & Lederer, A., L., (2006a). Incremental and comprehensive strategic information systems planning in an uncertain environment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(3), 380-394.
  • Nevo, S., Wade, M. R., & Cook, W. D. (2007). An examination of the trade-off between internal and external IT capabilities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(1), 5-23.
  • Nevo, S., & Wade, M. R. (2010). The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 163-183.
  • Nevo, S., & Wade, M. (2011). Firm-level benefits of IT-enabled resources: A conceptual extension and an empirical assessment. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(4), 403-418.
  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Nazir, S., & Pinsonneault, A. (2012). IT and firm agility: An electronic integration perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(3), 150-171.
  • Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing virtual customer environment for new product development: Toward a theory. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 392-413.
  • Nah, F. F-H., Lau, J. L-S., & Kuang, J. (2001). Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 285-296.
  • Morris, M. G., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). Job characteristics and job satisfaction: Understanding the role of enterprise resource planning system implementation. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 143-161.
  • Montealegre, R. (2002). A process model of capability development: Lessons from the electronic commerce strategy at Bolsa de Valores de Guayaquil. Organization Science, 13(5), 514-531.
  • Modarres, M., Beheshtian, M., & Ispahani, A. (2003). The contingent effects of industry conditions on relationship between structural complexity and strategic change. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 2(2), 44-53.
  • Mithas, S., Ramasubbu, N., Sambamurthy, V.(2011). How Information ManagementCapability Influences Firm Performance. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 237-256.
  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy making - and environment: the third link. Strategic management journal, 4(3), 221-235.
  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservation and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1-25.
  • Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 515-537.
  • Meng, Z., & Lee, S.-Y. T. (2007). The value of IT to firms in a developing country in the catch-up process: An empirical comparison of China and the United States. Decision Support Systems, 43(3), 737-745.
  • Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283-322.
  • McGaughey, R. E. (1999). Internet technology: Contributing to agility in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1(1), 7-13.
  • McArthur, A. W., & Nystrom, P. C. (1991). Environmental dynamism, complexity, and munificence as moderators of strategy-performance relationships. Journal of Business Research, 23(4), 349-361.
  • Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487-505.
  • Markus, M. L., & Tanis, C. (2000). The enterprise system experience - From adoption to success. In R. W. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the domains of IT management (pp. 173-207). Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc.
  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
  • Malone, T. W., Crowston, K., Lee, J., Pentland, B., Dellarocas, C., Wyner, G., ... O'Donnell, E. (1999). Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes. Management Science, 45(3), 425-443.
  • Makadok, R.(2001). Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-Based andDynamic-Capability Views of Rent Creation. Strategic Management Journal,22(5), 387-402.
  • Lyytinen, K., & Rose, G. M. (2006). Information system development agility as organizational learning. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 183-199.
  • Lucas, H. C., Jr., & Spitler, V. K. (1999). Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 291-311.
  • Lucas, H. C., Jr., & Olson, M. (1994). The impact of information technology on organizational flexibility. Journal of Organizational Computing, 4(2), 155-176.
  • Lu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 931-954.
  • Li, T., van Heck, E., & Vervest, P. (2009). Information capability and value creation strategy: Advancing revenue management through mobile ticketing technologies. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(1), 38-51.
  • Li, M., & Ye, L. R. (1999). Information technology and firm performance: Linking with environmental, strategic and managerial contexts. Information & Management, 35(1), 43-51.
  • Lee, O-K., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015). How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility?. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 398-417.
  • Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2010). Toward agile: An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 87-114.
  • Kohli,A.K.,& Jaworski,B.J.1990.Marketorientation:theconstruct,research propositions and managerialimplications.JournalofMarketing,54(2):1-18.
  • Kohli, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 23-39.
  • Kim, H. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 567-582.
  • Kettinger, W. J., Grover, V., Guha, S., & Segars, A. H. (1994). Strategic information systems revisited: A study in sustainability and performance. MIS Quarterly, 18(1), 31-58.
  • Kearns, G. S., & Sabherwal, R. (2007b). Strategic alignment between business and information technology: A knowledge-based view of behaviors, outcome, and consequences. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 129-162.
  • Kearns, G. S., & Sabherwal, R. (2007a). Antecedents and consequences of information systems planning integration. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(4), 628-643.
  • Kearns, G. S., & Lederer, A. L. (2004). The impact of industry contextual factors on IT focus and the use of IT for competitive advantage. Information & Management, 41(7), 899-919.
  • Katayama, H., & Bennett, D. (1999). Agility, adaptability and leanness: A comparison of concepts and a study of practice. International Journal of Production Economics, 60-61, 43-51.
  • Karimi, J., Somers, T. M., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2007b). The role of information systems resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 221-260.
  • Karimi, J., Somers, T. M., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2007a). The impact of ERP implementation on business process outcomes: A factor-based study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 101-134.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 52-63.
  • Kambil, A., Friesen, G. B., & Sundaram, A. (1999). Co-creation: A new source of value. Outlook Magazine, 3(2), 23-29.
  • Judge, W. Q., & Elenkov, D. (2005). Organizational capacity for change and environmental performance: An empirical assessment of Bulgarian firms. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 893-901.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). An information company in Mexico: Extending the resource-based view of the firm to a developing country context. Information Systems Research, 9(4), 342-361.
  • J reskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (1982). Systems under indirect observation: Causality structure prediction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  • Im, K. S., Dow, K. E., & Grover, V. (2001). Research report: A reexamination of IT investment and the market value of the firm-An event study methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 103-117.
  • IT 관리 능력과 IT 기술 능력이 IT-의존 조직 민첩성을 통해 조직의 기대이익에 미치는 영향
    김근아 김상현 Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 12(3), 35-55 [2013]
  • Huang, P.-Y., Pan, S. L., & Ouyang, T. H. (2014). Developing information processing capability for operational agility: Implications from a Chinese manufacturer. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(4), 462-480.
  • Holmqvist, M., & Pessi, K. (2006). Agility through scenario development and continuous implementation: A global aftermarket logistics case. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 146-158.
  • Hof, R. D. (2001). The people's company. Business Week, December 3, 15-21.
  • Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. W., & DeMarie, S. M. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 22-42.
  • Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Uhlenbruck, K., & Shimizu, K. (2006). The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1137-1157.
  • He, J. W. (2005). Knowledge management systems usage: The role of social relationships and organizational facilitating conditions. Proceedings of the 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, USA, 11-14.
  • Halverson, C. A., Erickson, T., & Ackerman, M. S. (2004). Behind the help desk: Evolution of a knowledge management system in a large organization. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, USA, 304-313.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hagel, J., & Singer, M. (1999). Net worth: Shaping markets when customers make the rules. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Haeckel, S. H. (1999). Adaptive enterprise: Creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Grover, V., & Ramanlal, P. (1999). Six myths of information and markets: Information technology networks, electronic commerce, and the battle for consumer surplus. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 465-495.
  • Grover, V., & Malhotra, M. K. (1999). A framework for examining the interface between operations and information systems: Implications for research in the new millennium. Decision Sciences, 30(4), 901-920.
  • Grover, V. (1993). An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences, 24(3), 603-640.
  • Gray, P. H., & Durcikova, A. (2006). The role of knowledge repositories in technical support environments: Speed versus learning in user performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 159-190.
  • Grant, R. M. (1996b). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
  • Grant, R. M. (1996a). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage:Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review,33(3), 114-135.
  • Gosain, S., Malhotra, A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2005). Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(3), 7-45.
  • Goodhue, D. L., Chen, D. Q., Boudreau, M. C., Davis, A., & Cochran, J. D. (2009). Addressing business agility challenges with enterprise systems. MIS Quarterly Executive, 8(2), 73-87.
  • Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N., & Preiss, K. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: Strategies for enriching the customer. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1-77.
  • Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. (2003). Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 307-321.
  • Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of Association for Information Systems, 16(5), 91-109.
  • Gallivan, M. J., Spitler, V. K., & Koufaris, M. (2005). Does information technology training really matter? A social information processing analysis of coworkers' influence on IT usage in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 153-192.
  • Galliers, R. (2007). Strategizing for agility: Confronting information systems inflexibility in dynamic environments. In K. DeSouza (Ed.), Agile information systems (pp. 1-15). Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier Inc.
  • Gallagher, K. P., & Worrell, J. L. (2008). Organizing IT to promote agility. Information Technology and Management, 9(1), 71-88.
  • Furneaux, B., & Wade, M. (2011). An exploration of organizational level Information systems discontinuance intentions. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 537-598.
  • Fornell, C., Lorange, P., & Roos. J. (1990). The cooperative venture formation process: A latent variable structural modeling approach. Management Science, 36(10), 1246-1255.
  • Fornell, C., & Yi, Y. (1992). Assumptions of the two-step approach to latent variable modeling. Sociological Methods Research, 20(3), 291-320.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two Structural Equation Models: LISRELand PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of MarketingResearch, 19(4), 440-452.
  • Flynn, B. B., & Flynn, E. J. (1999). Information-processing alternatives for coping with manufacturing environment complexity. Decision Sciences, 30(4), 1021-1052.
  • Fink, L., & Neumann, S. (2007). Gaining agility through IT personnel capabilities: The mediating role of IT infrastructure capabilities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(8), 440-462.
  • Fichman, R. G. (2004). Real options and IT platform adoption: Implications for theory and practice. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 132-154.
  • Feeny, D. F., & Wilcocks, L. P. (1998b). Re-designing the IS function around core capabilities. Long Range Planning, 31(3), 354-367.
  • Feeny, D. F., & Wilcocks, L. P. (1998a). Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Review, 39(3), 9-21.
  • Evans, P., & Wurster, T. S. (2000). Blown to bits: How the new economics of information transforms strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Sull, D. N. (2001). Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 107-116.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
  • Dove, R. (2001). Response ability: The language, structure, and culture of the agile enterprise. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Doherty, N. F., & Terry, M. (2009). The role of IS capabilities in delivering sustainable improvements to competitive positioning. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(2), 100-116.
  • Devaraj, S., Easley, R. F., & Crant, J. M. (2008). How does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Information Systems Research, 19(1), 93-105.
  • Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52-73.
  • Dehning, B., & Stratopoulos, T. (2003). Determinants of a sustainable competitive advantage due to an IT-enabled strategy. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(1), 7-28.
  • Day, G. S. (2000). Managing market relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 24-30.
  • Daniel, E. M., & Wilson, H. N. (2003). The role of dynamic capabilities in e-business transformation. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 282-296.
  • D'Aveni, R. A., Dagnino, G. B., & Smith, K. G. (2010). The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1371-1385.
  • D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Free Press.
  • Cronin, M. J. (2000). Unchained value: The new logic of digital business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (1995). Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118-128.
  • Closs, D. J., Jacobs, M. A., Swink, M., & Webb, G. S. (2008). Toward a theory of competencies for the management of product complexity: Six case studies. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), 590-610.
  • Clemons E. K., & Row, M. C. (1991). Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 275-292.
  • Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (2001). Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304-321.
  • Cho, H., Jung, M., & Kim, M. (1996). Enabling technologies of agile manufacturing and its related activities in Korea. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 30(3), 323-334.
  • Chin,W.W.,Marcolin,B.L.,& Newsted,P.R.(2003).A partialleastsquares latentvariable modeling approach formeasuring interactioneffects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and anelectronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information SystemsResearch,14(2),189-217.
  • Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307-341). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1). 7-16.
  • Chi, L., Ravichandran, T., & Andrevski, G. (2010). Information technology, network structure, and competitive action. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 543-570.
  • Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Jin, J., Wang, L., & Chow, W. S. (2014). IT capability and organizational performance: The roles of business process agility and environmental factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 326-342.
  • Chen, M.-J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 100-134.
  • Chen, L. (2010). Business-IT alignment maturity of companies in China. Information & Management, 47(1), 9-16.
  • Chan, C. M. L., Hackney, R., Pan, S. L., & Chou, T.-C. (2011). Managing e-Government system implementation: A resource enactment perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 529-541.
  • Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 976-997.
  • Carte, T. A., & Russell, C. J. (2003). In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 479-501.
  • Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review, 81(5), 41-49.
  • Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Caldeira, M. M., & Ward, J. M. (2003). Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(2), 127-141.
  • Burke, D. E., Wang, B. B. L., Wan, T. T. H., & Diana, M. L. (2002). Exploring hospitals' adoption of information technology. Journal of Medical Systems, 26(4), 349-355.
  • Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm's supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119-140.
  • Bradley, S. P., & Nolan, R. L. (1998). Sense and respond: Capturing value in the network era. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Bradley, R. V., Pratt, R. M. E., Byrd, T. A., Outlay, C. N., & Wynn, D. E., Jr. (2012). Enterprise architecture, IT effectiveness and the mediating role of IT alignment in US hospitals. Information Systems Journal, 22(2), 97-127.
  • Boudreau, M.-C., & Robey, D. (2005). Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science, 16(1), 3-18.
  • Bhatt, G. D., & Grover, V. (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 253-277.
  • Bharadwaj, A. S., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). IT capabilities: Theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, USA, 378-385.
  • Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000), “A Resource-based Perspective on InformationTechnologyCapabilityandFirm Performance:AnEmpiricalInvestigation,”MISQuarterly,24(1),169?196.
  • Bessant, J., Francis, D., Meredith, S., Kalinsky, R., & Brown, S. (2001). Developing manufacturing agility in SMEs. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(1-3), 28-54.
  • Bensaou, M., & Anderson, E. (1999). Buyer-supplier relations in industrial markets: When do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments?. Organization Science, 10(4), 460-481.
  • Benitez-Amado, J., & Walczuch, R. M. (2012). Information technology, the organizational capability of proactive corporate environmental strategy and firm performance: A resource-based analysis. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(6), 664-679.
  • Benaroch, M., Lichtenstein, Y., & Robinson, K. (2006). Real options in information technology risk management: An empirical validation of risk-option relationships. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 827-864.
  • Benaroch, M. (2002). Managing information technology investment risk: A real options perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 43-84.
  • Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2010). The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 689-710.
  • Bassellier, G., Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (2001). Information technology competence of business managers: A definition and research model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 159-182.
  • Barua, A., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2000). Information technology and business performance. In R. W. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the domains of IT management: Projecting the future through the past. Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Press.
  • Barreto, I.(2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and anAgenda for the Future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256-280.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
  • BRE 활용을 통한 조직민첩성 창출: "W" 투자증권 사례를 중심으로
    갈희 곽기영 옥정봉 이정민 차상민 Information Systems Review, 12(1), 131-144 [2010]
  • Au, N., Ngai, E. W. T., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2008). Extending the understanding of end user information systems satisfaction formation: An equitable needs fulfillment model approach. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 43-66.
  • Arthur, W. B. (1996). Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 100-109.
  • Arteta, B. M., & Giachetti, R. E. (2004). A measure of agility as the complexity of the enterprise system. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 20(6), 495-503.
  • Arag n-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71-88.
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e?business. Strategicmanagement journal, 22(6?7), 493-520.
  • Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic Assets and OrganizationalRent, Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
  • Allen, B. R., & Boynton, A. C. (1991). Information architecture: In search of efficient flexibility. MIS Quarterly, 15(4), 435-445.
  • Agarwal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002). Principles and models for organizing the IT function. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(1), 1-16.
  • ?RTE 구현 정보시스템과 민첩성 역량 그리고 기업성과의?관계
    이한근 조용구 하경태 Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 6(2), 113-127 [2007]