연구동향 분석
박사

기술이 문화가치관에 미치는 영향 : Hofstede 문화모델을 중심으로

김학조 2016년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 기술이 문화가치관에 미치는 영향 : Hofstede 문화모델을 중심으로' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 사회학
  • itu
  • 기술수용성
  • 기술창출
  • 기술확산
  • 문화차원
  • 세계경제포럼
  • 세계은행
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
120 0

0.0%

' 기술이 문화가치관에 미치는 영향 : Hofstede 문화모델을 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • Y.Kashima& E,Ksahima,(2003). Individualism ,GNP, Climate ,and Pronoun Drop is individualism determined by affluence and climate, or language use play a role ?（Y.Kashima& E,Ksahima,(2003). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,vol.34 no1,january 125-134.
  • Weber,M.(1958) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, New York: Scribner,s. WEF(World Economics Forum, 2012-2013).
  • Waterman,A.S.(1984). Individualism and interdependence Amercian Psycnologist,36,762-773.
  • Walsham, G,(2002). Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 26, 4, 359-380.
  • Wagner, C.S., Brahmakulam,(2001). I.T., Brian, A., Jackson, A.,Wong,T.Y. Science and Technology Collaboration: Building Capacity　in Developing Countries. RAND Corporation,Washington, DC,　Document No: MR-1357.0-WB
  • UN. E-Government Survey (2012): E-Government for the People. New York: United Nations, 2012.
  • Triandis,H.C.(1983).Allocentric vs. idiocentric social behavior: A major cultural difference between Hispanics and the Mainstream. Technical Report No.ONR-16.Champaign Department of Psycho;ogy University of Illinois.
  • Triandis,(1995)Individualism and collectivism. Boulder,CO : Westview..Quarterly,1995. 26(4),359–.380
  • Soumitra Dutta and Bruno Lanvin EditorsThe Global Innovation Index 2013 The Local Dynamics of Innovation.
  • Sirilli, G., (1997). Science and technology indicators: the state of the art　and prospects for the future. In: Antonelli, G., De Liso, N. (Eds.), Sala-i-Martin, X., and Schwab, K,(2012). The Global Competitiveness Report: 2012-2013.World Economic Forum.
  • Scott, M.F., (1989). A New View of Economic Growth. Oxford University　 Press, Oxford；Evangelista, R., (1999). Knowledge and Investment. The Sources of　Innovation in Industry. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
  • SH Schwartz,(1994) Are there univesal aspects in the structure and contents of human vlues ? Journal of social issues.
  • R. Nelson,(1994). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure and supporting institutions, Ind. Corp. Chang. 3 (1) , 47–.63
  • Ottawa European Commission (EC), 2003. Third European Report on Science & Technology. EC, Brussels.
  • OECD, (2003). Main Science and Technology Indicators (MSTI).　OECD, Paris P.A. David,(1988). Path-dependence: putting the past into the future of economics, Stanford Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences (EconomicSeries) Technical Report, 533.
  • National Science Foundation (NSF), (2002). Science and Engineering　Iindicators. Washington, DC
  • Miles, I. (2005). Innovation in services. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, &　 R. Nelson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford　 University Press.
  • Markus, M.L., and Robey, D,(1988). Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34, 5 , 583-598
  • M. Bell, K. Pavitt,(1997). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries, in: D. Archibugi, J. Michie　(Eds.), Technology Globalisation and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Lundvall, B.-A., Johnson, B., (1994). The learning economy. Journal　of Industry Studies2 (1), 23–４2.
  • Lee, K., & Kim, B. (2009). Both institutions and policies matter but differently for different income groups of countries: Determinants of long-run economic growth revisited. World Development, 37(3), 533–549.
  • Lall, S., (2001a). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports 1985–-98. Oxford Development Studies 28 (3), 337–369.
  • Kwon et al..(2012). Do Korea , China and Japan form a cultural cluster ?.pp.23-49.
  • Koopmans, T., (1947). Measurement without theory. Review of Economics　and Statistics 29 (3), 161–72
  • Kline, S.J., and Rosenberg, N,(1986). An overview of innovation. In, Landau, R., and Rosenberg, N., (eds.)The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth,　Washington, DC: National academy of sciences, 1986.
  • Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum, The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014(WEF),
  • Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum, The Global Competitiveness Report (2014-2015)
  • Kashima &Foddy,(2002).　Time and selt: The historical construction of the self. In Y.Kashima,M. Foddy,&M. Platow(Eds),self and identity: The personal, social, and symbolic(pp.181-206). Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • J. Rifkin,(2000). The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, Where all of Lif is a Paid-For Experience, Penguin, London.
  • J. James,(2006). An institutional critique of recent attempts to measure technological capabilities across countries, J. Econ. Issues XL (3) , 743–.766.
  • International Telecommunication Union(2014).
  • Ingelhart,R.,Baker, W.(2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociolgical Review,65(1):19-51.
  • Hulland, J.(1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 2 , 195-204.
  • Hui &Triandis.(1986). Individualism and Collectivism : A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol.17. no.2,june.225-248.
  • Howitt, P. (2000). Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences. Econometrics, 15(4), 59–.81.
  • House R.J. et al.(2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations : The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies Thousand Oaks, CA :Sage.
  • Hofstede,g. Culture,s consequences . Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.(1980)
  • Hofstede,G,(2001).Cultural conseqence :Comparing vlaues,behaviors, institutions, and organizations cross nations(2nded.).Oaks,CA:Sage.
  • Harhoff, D., Hoisl, K., Reichl, B., & de la Potterie, B. (2009). Patent　 validation at the country level. The role of fees and translation costs.　 Research Policy, 38(9),1423 –.1437.
  • H. Grupp, M.E. Mogee,(2004). Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators? Res. Policy 33 (9) , 1373– 1384.
  • Grupp, H., (1998. Foundations of the Economics of Innovation. Theory，　 Measurement and Practice. Edward Elgar, Chetenham, UK.
  • Giovanni Cerulli, Andrea Filippetti,(2012).　The complementary nature of technological capabilities: Measurement and　robustness issues．
  • Gefen, D., and Straub, D,(2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16 , 109.
  • Gallivan, M., and Srite, M(2005). Information technology and culture: Identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture. Information and Organization, 15, 4 , 295-338.
  • Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F,(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18, 1 , 39-50.
  • Fischer, S.(1993). The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 3 , 485-512
  • F. Malerba,(2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Res. Policy 31 247–.264
  • European Commission, European Innovation Scoreboard (2008), Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance, European Commission, DG Enterprise, Brussels,(2009).
  • Economics of Structural and Technological Change. Routledge,(1998).　London, pp. 281–06. Statistics Canada. World Trade Analyzer: (1980–1996).
  • Easy SEM with Smart PLS
    김계수 (청람) [2013]
  • E. Casadio, P. Palazzi, An index for sustainable development, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, Q. Rev. 58 (229) (2004) 185–.206.
  • Desai, M., Fukuda-Parr, S., Johansson, C., Sagasti, F., (2002) Measuring　the technology achievement of nations and the capacity to　participate in the network age. Journal of Human Development　3 (1), 95–122.
  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The　two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–.596.
  • Chin,W.W.,(1998a), Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychology Bulletin,Vol.88,No.3,pp.588-606.
  • Cerulli＆Filippetti,(2012). The complementary nature of technological capabilities: Measurement and robustness issue: Technological Forecasting & Social Change
  • Burns, A.F., Mitchell, W.C., (1946). Measuring Business Cycles. National　Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
  • Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L.M.(2000).Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,　14, 4 , 23-48.
  • Barley, S.R.(1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly　78-108.
  • Archibugi, D., Pianta, M., (1992). The technological specialization of advanced countries. In:AReport to the EEC on International Science　and Technology Activities. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.；Patel, P., Pavitt, K., (1994). Nationa innovation systems: why they are important and how they might be measured and compared.　Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3, 7–5.
  • Archibugi, D., Denni, M., & Filippetti, A. (2009). The technological　capabilities of nations: A review of the synthetic indicators. Technological　Forecasting and Social Change,76(7), 917–.931
  • Archibugi, D., Coco, A., (200５).Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice，Research Policy 34 175-94.
  • Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo). World Development, 32(4), 629–654.
  • Archibugi, A. Coco, (2004). A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo), World Dev. 32 (4) 629–654.
  • Archibugi et ai.,(2009). European Commission, European Innovation Scoreboard 2008, Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance, European Commission, DG Enterprise, Brussels.
  • Archibugi and Coco, (2014). Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice.12.002.
  • Archibugi &Coco,(2005). Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice. Research Policy34 pp.175-194.
  • Anderson, V., (1991), Alternative Economic Indicators. Routledge　,London.