Zandvoort, R.W. (1961), The Categories and Types of Present-DayEnglish Word Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach-Review, English Studies 42:1-6, 12-124.
Voorhoeve, J. (1981), Multifunctionality as a Derivational Problem. InMuysken, P. (ed.) Generative Studies on Creole Languages,Dordrecht: Foris, 25-34.
Vonen, A.M. (1994), Multifunctionality and Morphology in Tokelauand English, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17, 155-178.
Sweet, H. (1966), A New English Grammar: logical and historical,Oxford: Clarendon.
Spencer, A. (1991), Morphological Theory. An Introduction to WordStructure in Generative Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell.
Sleeman, P. (2013), Deadjectival human nouns: conversion, nominalellipsis, or mixed category?, Linguistica: revista de estudoslinguisticos da Universidade do Porto 8, 159-180.
Quirk, R. et. al. (1985), A Comprehensive Grammar of the EnglishLanguage, London and New York: Longman.
Quirk, R. et. al. (1972), A Grammar of Contemporary English,London: Longman.
Pavesi, M. (1998), Same Word, Same Idea. Conversion as a WordFormation Process, IRAL 36-3, 213-232.
Nida, E. (1949), Morphology: the descriptive analysis of words,Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Nagano, A. (2008), Categorial Change of Conversion and the Processof Relisting, English Linguistics 25-2, 369-401.
Marzo, D. (2013), Italian Verb to Noun Conversion: the Case ofNouns in a deriving from Verbs of the 2nd and 3rd conjugation. Linguistica: revista de estudos linguisticos da Universidade do Porto 8, 69-87.
Martsa, S. (2012), Conversion in English: A Cognitive SemanticApproach, University of Pecs, Institute of English, HabilitationThesis.
Marchand, H. (1969), The Categories and Types of Present-DayEnglish Word Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach,Munchen: Bech.
Marchand, H. (1964), A Set of Criteria for the Establishing ofDerivational Relationship between Words Unmarked byDerivational Morphemes, Indogermanische Forschungen 69, 10-19.
Marchand, H. (1963), On a Question of Contrary Analysis withderivationally connected but morphologically uncharacterizedwords, English Studies 41:1-6, 176-187.
Manova, S. (2011), Understanding Morphological Rules: With SpecialEmphasis on Conversion and Substraction in Bulgarian,Russian and Serbo-Croatian, New York: Springer Science&Business Media.
Lieber, R. (2006), The category of roots and the roots of categories:what we learn from selection in derivation, Morphology 16, 247-272.
Lieber, R. (2005), English Word Formation Processes, In ?tekauer, P.and Lieber, R. (eds.) Handbook of Word-Formation, Dordrecht:Springer, 375-427.
Lieber, R. (1992), Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formationin Syntactic Theory, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lieber, R. (1981), On the Organization of the Lexicon, Bloomington:Indiana University Linguistic Club.
Lieber, R. (1981), Morphological Conversion within a RestrictiveTheory of the Lexicon, In Moorgat, M, Hulst, H. Hoekstra, T.(eds) The Scope of Lexical Rules, Linguistic Models, Dordrecht? Holland/Cinnaminson ? USA: Foris Publications, 161-200.
Koziol, H. (1937), Ubertrit ohne Formanderung, In Koziol, H. (ed.)Handbuch der englischen Wortbildungslehre, Heidelberg:Universitatsverlag Winter.
Kim, G.H. (2010), Synchrony and Diachrony of Conversion inEnglish, MSc Degree Dissertation, The University of Edinburgh.
Jovanovic, V.Z. (2003), On Productivity, Creativity and Restrictions onWord Conversion in English, Linguistics and Literature 2-10, 425-436.
Hockett, Ch. (1958), A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York:Macmillan.
Haspelamth, M. (2010), Understanding morphology, London: HodderEductiom.
Farrell, P. (2001), Functional shift as category underspecification,English Language and Linguistics 5-1, 109-130.
Driven, R. (1999), Conversion as a Conceptual Metonymy of EventSchemata, In Metonymy in Language and Thought ,Klaus-Uwe Panther and Gunter Radden (eds.) 275-285,Amsterdam and Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
Don, J. (2005), On conversion, relisting and zero-derivation, SKASEJournal of Theoretical Linguistics 2-2, 2-16.
Croft, W. (2001), Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theoryin typological perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Balteiro, I. (2007), The Directionality of Conversion in English:A Dia-Synchronic Study, Bern: Peter Lang.