박사

초등학생들의 과학 정체성과 과학 관련 진로 포부의 관계

강은희 2015년
논문상세정보
' 초등학생들의 과학 정체성과 과학 관련 진로 포부의 관계' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 과학 관련 진로 포부
  • 과학 관련 진로에 대한 인식
  • 과학 능력에 대한 인식
  • 과학 정체성
  • 과학에 대한 흥미
  • 종단 연구
  • 타인의 평가에 대한 인식
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
397 0

0.0%

' 초등학생들의 과학 정체성과 과학 관련 진로 포부의 관계' 의 참고문헌

  • 학생들의 과학진로 선택 과정에 영향을 미치는 요인들 간의 인과관계 분석
    윤진 한국과학교육학회지, 27(2), 570-582 [2007]
  • 초등학생의 진로포부에 대한 부모학습관여와 학업적 자기효능감의 관계 연구
    양난미 이지연 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료,20(2), 455-472 [2008]
  • 초등학생의 과학-수학 교과에 대한 인식과 경험이 과학기술분야 진로 선택에 미치는 영향 분석
    이수영 한국초등교육, 22(1),99-117 [2011]
  • 초등학생 진로발달 검사도구의 타당화 연구
    이종범 진로교육연구,18(2), 79-105 [2005]
  • 초등학생 직업포부 및 인식의 발달에 관한 연구
    김지현 유정이 황매향 진로교육연구, 15(2), 1-17 [2002]
  • 초·중·고 학생들의 과학 관련 진로선택 요인
    윤진 한국과학교육학회지, 22(4), 906-921 [2002]
  • 청소년기 자아정체성 연구의 대안적 접근: 서술적 정체성 발달
    김근영 청소년학연구, 19(3), 85-108 [2012]
  • 청소년 진로상담
    강순화 김봉환 이은경 이창호 서울: 한국청소년상담원 [2002]
  • 진로지도의 의의와 실태
    정철영 교육개발, 100, 28-31 [1997]
  • 전공의 벽을 넘어온 지구과학 예비교사들의 정체성 형성과정
    유은정 서울대학교 박사학위논문 [2009]
  • 자기의 탐색
    박아청 서울: 교육과학사 [1998]
  • 여성 과학교육의 활성화 방안: 외국의 여학생 친화적인 과학교육 프로그램과 교수학습 전략 분석을 통해
    최경희 과학기술학연구,3(1), 19-39 [2003]
  • 박사
  • 아이텐티티의 세계
    박아청 서울: 교육과학사 [1993]
  • 성 통합적 과학 수업이 중학생들의 수업 참여도와 교사-학생 간 상호작용에 대한 인식 및 학업 성취도에 미치는 영향: 중학교 1학년 ‘빛’과 ‘소화와 순환’ 단원을 중심으로
    김휘 서울대학교 석사학위논문 [2007]
  • 사범대학 예비교사의 삶과 정체성 변화 연구
    한재영 교사교육연구. 51(1), 75-89 [2012]
  • 미래사회와 진로선택
    김충기 서울: 배영사 [1991]
  • 과학자들의 진로선택과정에서 드러난 부각요인
    장경애 한국교육학회지, 24(6), 1131-1142 [2004]
  • 박사
  • Woolnough, B. E. (1994). Factors affecting students’ choice ofscience and engineering. International Journal of ScienceEducation, 16(6), 659-676.
  • Wong, B. (2012). Science aspiration: Investigating the view of11-14 year old minority ethnic pupils. King’s CollegeLondon, Doctoral Dissertation.
  • Welzel, M. & Roth, W.-M. (1998). Interviews really assessstudents' knowledge? International Journal of ScienceEducation, 20(1), 25-44.
  • Wang, J, & Staver, J. R. (2001). Examining relationships betweenfactors of science education and student career aspiration.The Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 312-319.
  • Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’' decliningmotivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199-216.
  • Turner, S. L., Steward, J. C., & Lepan, R. T. (2004). Family factorsassociated with sixth-grade adolescents’ math and sciencecareer interests. The Career Development Quarterly, 53,41-52.
  • Trusty, J. (2000). High educational expectations and lowachievement: Stability of educational goals acrossadolescence. Journal of Educational Research, 93(6),356-365.
  • Tan, E. & Calabrese Barton, A. (2008). From peripheral to central,the story of Melanie’s metamorphosis. Science Education,92(4), 567-590Trice, A. D., & King, R. (1991). Stability of kindergarten children'scareer aspirations to parent's occupations. Journal of GeneticPsychology, 153(3), 355-357.
  • Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planningearly for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143?1144.
  • Swarat, S., Ortony, A., and Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters:Understanding student interest in school science. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 49(4), 515-537.
  • Super, D. E.(1953). A theory of vocational development. American Psychologist, 8, 185-190.
  • Sturman, L., Ruddock, G., Burge, B., Styles, B., Lin, Y., & Vappula,H. (2008). England’'s achievement in TIMSS 2007: Nationalreport for England. Slough: NFER.
  • Stokking, K. M. (2000). Predicting the choice of physics insecondary education. International Journal of ScienceEducation, 22(12), 1261?1283.
  • Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Mathand science motivation: A longitudinal examination of thelinks between choices and beliefs. DevelopmentalPsychology, 42(1), 70-83.
  • Shanahan, M-C., & Nieswandt, M. (2011). Science student role:Evidence of social structural norms specific to schoolscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 48(4),367-395.
  • Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, andtransformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29.
  • Self and society: A symbolic interactionistsocial psychology. (8th Ed.)/ 윤인진 외 역(2001). 자아와 사회:상징적 상호작용주의 사회심리학
    Hewitt, J. P. 서울: 학지사 [2000]
  • Scherz, Z., & Oren, M. (2006). How to change students’ images of science andtechnology. Science Education, 90, 965?985.
  • Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routhledge and KeganPaul.
  • Sadler, P.M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., and Tai, R. (2012). Stabilityand volatility of STEM career interest in high school: Agender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411-427.
  • Qualitative inquiry andresearch design: Choosing among five traditions, SagePublications/ 조흥식 외 역(2005). 질적 연구방법론: 다섯 가지전통
    Creswell, J. W. Miller, D. L. 서울: 학지사 [2005]
  • Pereira-Mendoza, L. 초 중등 우수학생 이공계진출을 위한 과학교육정책 방안 수립 연구
    서혜애 장수명 서울: 한국교육개발원 [2004]
  • Osborne, J. F., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: Areview of the literature and its implications. International Journal of ScienceEducation, 25(9), 1049?1079.
  • Osborne, J. F., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role andvalue of the science curriculum: A focus-group study.International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467.
  • Oliver, W. H., Pettus, W. C., & Hedin, B. A. (1990). Three studiesof factors affecting the attitudes of blacks and females toward the pursuit of science and science-related careers.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(4), 289-314.
  • O'Brien, K. M., Friedman, S. M., Tipton, L. C., & Linn, S. G. (2000). Attachment, separation, and women's vocational development: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(3), 301-315.
  • National Science Teachers Association(NSTA) (1998). InformalScience Education: An NSTA position statement. Washington,DC: The author.
  • McAdams, D. P. (2006). The problem of narrative coherence.Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19, 109-125.
  • McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of GeneralPsychology, 5, 100-122.
  • Magnuson, C. S., & Scarr, M. F. (2000). How early is too early tobegin life career planning? The importance of the elementaryschool years. Journal of Career Development, 27, 89-101.
  • Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2010). Choosing science: Understandingthe declines in senior high school science enrollments.Armidale, Australia: University of New England.
  • Lindahl, B. (2007). A longitudinal study of students' attitudestowards science and choice of career. Paper presented atthe Annual Meeting of the National Association for Researchin Science Teaching. New Orleans, LA.
  • Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive Theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.
  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities,and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, andActivity, 7(4), 273?290.
  • Leibham, M. B., Alexander, J. M., and Johnson, K .E. (2013).Science interests in preschool boys and girls: Relations tolater self-concept and science achievement. ScienceEducation, 97(4), 574-593.
  • Lee, J. D. (1998). Which kids can “become” scientists? Effects ofgender, self-concepts, and perceptions of scientists. SocialPsychology Quarterly, 61(3), 199-219.
  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Peripheralparticipation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Koller, O., Baumert, J., & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interestmatter? The relationship between academic interest andachievement in mathematics. Journal for Research inMathematics Education, 32, 448-470.
  • Josselson, R. (1996). Revision herself: The story of women’sidentity from college to midlife. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.
  • Jacobs, J. E. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Parents, task values, andreal-life achievement-related choices. In: C. Sansone, & J.M. Harackiewics (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation:the search for optimal motivation and performance, (pp.405-439). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Jackson, P. A., & Seiler, G. (2013). Science identity trajectories oflatecomers to science in college. Journal of Research inScience Teaching, 50(7), 826-857.
  • Hullenman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utilityvalue intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102,880-890.
  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four phase model ofinterest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2),111-127.
  • Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M-C. (2010).Connecting high school physics experiences, outcomeexpectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: Agender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,47(8), 978-1003.
  • Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P.D. Gay (Eds), Questions of cultural identity, (pp. 1-17).London: Sage Publications.
  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: Adevelopmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal ofCounseling Psychology, 28, 545-580.
  • Gollub, J., & Spital, R. (2002). Advanced physics in high schools.Physics Today, 55(5), 48?53.
  • Gillibrand, E., Robinson, P., Brawn, R., & Osborn, A. (1999). Girls’participation in physics in single sex classes in mixedschools in relation to confidence and achievement.International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 349?362.
  • Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research ineducation. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125.
  • Ferry, T. R., Fouad, N. A., & Smith, P. L. (2000). The role of family context in a socialcognitive model for career-related choice behavior: A math and science perspective.J ournal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3) , 348-364.
  • Farenga, S.J., & Joyce, B.A. (1999). Intentions of young students toenroll in science courses in the future: An examination ofgender differences. Science Education, 83(1), 55-75.
  • Erikson(1968). Identity Youth and Crisis. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. M. (2006). Complexdilemmas of identity and practice. Science Education, 90(1),68-93.
  • Eccles, J. S., Vida, M. N., & Barber, B. (2004). The relation ofearly adolescents’ college plans and both academic abilityand task-value beliefs to subsequent college enrollment.Journal of Early Adolescence, 24(1), 63?77.
  • Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs aspredictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382?393.
  • DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B.(2013). Young children’s aspirations in science: Theunequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. InternationalJournal of Science Education, 35(6), 1037-1063.
  • Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L.,Sonnert, G., Sadler P. M., & Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-schooltime science activities and their association with careerinterest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education,Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 2(1), 63-79.
  • Cranston, P., & Leonard, M. (1990). The relationship betweenundergraduates' experiences of campus micro-inequities andtheir self-esteem and aspirations. Journal of College StudentDevelopment, 31, 395-400.
  • Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach todistributed to cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributedcognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp.1?6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cobb, P. (2004). Mathematics, literacies, and identity. ReadingResearch Quarterly, 39, 339-337.
  • Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondaryschool. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471?486.
  • Chiu, M. (2010). Effects of science interest and environmentalresponsibility on science aspiration and achievement: genderdifferences and cultural supports. Educational Research andEvaluation, 16(4), pp. 345-370.
  • Chinn, P. W. U. (2002). Asian and Pacific islander women scientistsand engineers: A narrative explanation of model minority,gender, and racial stereotypes. Journal of Research inScience Teaching, 39(4), 302?323.
  • Castells, M. (2010). The Power of Identity: Second edition With anew preface. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Carlone, H. B., Scott, C. M., & Lowder, C. (2014). Becoming (less)scientific: A longitudinal study of students' identity workfrom elementary to middle school science. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 51(7), 836-869.
  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the scienceexperiences of successful women of color: Science identityas an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44(8), 1187-1218.
  • Carlone H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessingequity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 459-485.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B.,Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a futurein science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work overtime and space. American Educational Research Journal,50(1), 37.75.
  • Burke, P. J. (2003). Introduction. In: P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R.T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theoryand research. New York: Kluwer.
  • Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientificliteracy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework forunderstanding science learning. Science Education, 89,779-802.
  • Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind ofa girl does science? The construction of school scienceidentities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5),441-458.
  • Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women’sscientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 38(8), 965-980.
  • Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feministperspective on learning. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 38(3), 282-295.
  • Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations ofacademic motivation among middle and high school students:Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal ofeducational Psychology, 93, 23-34.
  • Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math andscience: Do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later? Journalof Educational Psychology, 96(1), 97-109.
  • Beal, S. J., & Crockett, L. J. (2010). Adolescents’ occupational andeducational aspirations and expectations: Links to highschool activities and adult educational attainment.Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 258?265.
  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C.(2001). Self-efficacy beliefs a shapers of children’saspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1),187-206.
  • Baker, D. (1998). Equity issues in science education. In B. J.Fraser& K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook ofscience education (pp. 869.896). Boston: Kluwer.
  • Aschibacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me?High school students’ identities, participation and aspirationsin science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research inScience Teaching, 47(5), 564-582.
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B.(2010). 'Doing' science vs 'being' a scientist. ScienceEducation, 94(4), 617-639.
  • Applying career development theoryCounseling, (4th Ed.)/ 이재창 외 역(2008). 진로발달 이론을 적용한 진로상담
    Sharf, R. S. 서울: 아카데미프레스. p. 159-181 [2006]
  • Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999).Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypesof elementary students and their parents about scienceversus other school subjects. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 36(6), 719-747.
  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S., Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychologicalprocesses that mediate their relationship. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 94, 545?561.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1988). An analysis of four ways of assessingstudent beliefs about STS topics. Journal of Research inScience Teaching, 25, 607-629.
  • Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., Podelefsky, N. S., Dubson, M.,Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). New instrumentfor measuring student beliefs about physics and learningphysics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about ScienceSurvey. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics EducationResearch, 2, 1-14.
  • ASPIRES. (2013). Young people’s science and career aspirations,age 10-14. London: King’s College.