연구동향 분석
박사

열-순환 및 응력-순환처리가 다양한 복합레진으로 수복한 치경부 수복물의 미세누출과 접착강도에 주는 영향 = Effect of thermo-mechanical cycling treatment on the microleakage and bond strength of different cervical composite restorations

이준수 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 열-순환 및 응력-순환처리가 다양한 복합레진으로 수복한 치경부 수복물의 미세누출과 접착강도에 주는 영향 = Effect of thermo-mechanical cycling treatment on the microleakage and bond strength of different cervical composite restorations' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 미세 누출
  • 복합레진
  • 열-순환
  • 응력-순환
  • 접착 강도
  • 치경부 비우식성 병소
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
66 0

0.0%

' 열-순환 및 응력-순환처리가 다양한 복합레진으로 수복한 치경부 수복물의 미세누출과 접착강도에 주는 영향 = Effect of thermo-mechanical cycling treatment on the microleakage and bond strength of different cervical composite restorations' 의 참고문헌

  • Tuncer D, Celik C, Yamanel K, Arhun N. 1 year clinical evaluation ofmicrohybrid composites used in the restoration of non-carious cervicallesions. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014;13(2):366-71.
  • Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent 2004;32(3):173-96.
  • Silva AG, Martins CC, Zina LG, et al. The association between occlusalfactors and noncarious cervical lesions: a systematic review. J Dent2013;41(1):9-16.
  • Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, et al. Microleakage at enamel and dentinmargins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent 2014;8(1):1-8.
  • Rees JS. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the developmentof abfraction lesions: a finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(2):188-93.
  • Rees JS, Hammadeh M. Undermining of enamel as a mechanism ofabfraction lesion formation: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112(4):347-52.
  • Rees J, Jacobsen P. The effect of cuspal flexure on a buccal Class Vrestoration: a finite element study. Journal of dentistry 1998;26(4):361-67.
  • Pecie R, Krejci I, Garcia-Godoy F, Bortolotto T. Noncarious cervicallesions (NCCL)--a clinical concept based on the literature review. Part 2:restoration. Am J Dent 2011;24(3):183-92.
  • Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJ, Wilson NH. The aetiology of the noncariouscervical lesion. Int Dent J 1999;49(3):139-43.
  • Mitsui FH, Peris AR, Cavalcanti AN, Marchi GM, Pimenta LA. Influence of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bondstrengths of total and self-etching adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2006;31(2):240-7.
  • McCubbin J. Abfraction. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133(6):694, 96; authorreply 96.
  • Makeeva IM, Sheveliuk Iu V. [The role of abfraction in the aetiology ofwedge-shaped defects]. Stomatologiia (Mosk) 2012;91(1):65-70.
  • Levitch L, Bader J, Shugars D, Heymann H. Non-carious cervical lesions. Journal of Dentistry 1994;22(4):195-207.
  • Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, et al. Physico-mechanicalcharacteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent282014;42(8):993-1000.
  • Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerizationshrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999;15(2):128-37.
  • Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contractionstress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2005;21(12):1150-7.
  • Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowablecomposite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater 2011;27(4):348-55.
  • Ichim IP, Schmidlin PR, Li Q, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Restoration of noncariouscervical lesions Part II. Restorative material selection to minimisefracture. Dent Mater 2007;23(12):1562-9.
  • Ichim I, Li Q, Loughran J, Swain MV, Kieser J. Restoration of noncariouscervical lesions Part I. Modelling of restorative fracture. DentMater 2007;23(12):1553-61.
  • Heymann HO, Sturdevant J, Bayne S, et al. Examining tooth flexureeffects on cervical restorations: A two-year clinical study. Journal of theAmerican Dental Association (1939) 1991;122(5):41-47.
  • Geramy A, Sharafoddin F. Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finiteelement method. Quintessence Int 2003;34(7):526-33.
  • Fruits T, VanBrunt C, Khajotia S, Duncanson Jr M. Effect of cyclicallateral forces on microleakage in cervical resin composite restorations. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany: 1985) 2002;33(3):205.
  • Feilzer A, De Gee A, Davidson C. Setting stress in composite resin inrelation to configuration of the restoration. Journal of Dental Research1987;66(11):1636-39.
  • Chan DC, Browning WD, Pohjola R, Hackman S, Myers ML. Predictorsof non-carious loss of cervical tooth tissues. Oper Dent 2006;31(1):84-8.
  • Ceruti P, Menicucci G, Mariani GD, Pittoni D, Gassino G. Non cariouscervical lesions. A review. Minerva Stomatol 2006;55(1-2):43-57.
  • Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review ofpolymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versusstress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21(1):17-24.
  • Cadenaro M, Marchesi G, Antoniolli F, et al. Flowability of composites isno guarantee for contraction stress reduction. Dent Mater 2009;25(5):649-54.
  • Braga RR, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Contraction stress of flowablecomposite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. J AmDent Assoc 2003;134(6):721-8.
  • Borcic J, Anic I, Smojver I, et al. 3D finite element model and cervicallesion formation in normal occlusion and in malocclusion. J Oral Rehabil2005;32(7):504-10.
  • Arslan S, Demirbuga S, Ustun Y, et al. The effect of a new-generationflowable composite resin on microleakage in Class V compositerestorations as an intermediate layer. J Conserv Dent 2013;16(3):189-93.
  • Ahmed H, Durr ES, Rahman M. Factors associated with Non-CariousCervical Lesions (NCCLs) in teeth. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2009;19(5):279-82.