박사

중소기업 컨설팅 도구로서 TRIZ의 유효성에 관한 연구 = A study on the effectiveness of TRIZ as a consulting tool in SMEs

윤정혜 2015년
논문상세정보
' 중소기업 컨설팅 도구로서 TRIZ의 유효성에 관한 연구 = A study on the effectiveness of TRIZ as a consulting tool in SMEs' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • triz
  • triz컨설팅
  • 중소기업 컨설팅도구
  • 창조적 문제해결
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
167 0

0.0%

' 중소기업 컨설팅 도구로서 TRIZ의 유효성에 관한 연구 = A study on the effectiveness of TRIZ as a consulting tool in SMEs' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국기업의 전략적 품질경영과 경영성과
    노부호 박영수 품질경영학회지 , 27(1) [1999]
  • 한국 금융산업에서 6 시그마 시행의 성공요인에 관한 연구
    김영대 연세대학교 박사학위 논문 [2002]
  • 피부미용실의 서비스품질이 재구매의도에 미치는 영향
    김선옥 배재대학교 박사학위논문 [2003]
  • 품질경영 핵심영역간의 상관관계연구
    품질경영학회지 , 26(1) [1998]
  • 컨설팅몰입이 컨설팅품질지각 및 컨설팅효과성에 미치는 영향: 정부지원 중소기업 컨설팅을 중심으로, 박사학위논문
    송거영 한성대학교 [2015]
  • 컨설팅 입문
    조민호 새로운 제안 [2006]
  • 창의성 및 Think Mechanism 분석을 통한 효율적 &창의적 문제해결 프로세스 연구
    안영수 전상평 황인극 대한설비관리학회지 , 19(3), 91-99 [2014]
  • 중소기업기술정보진흥원
    중소기업 컨설팅지원사업 성과분석 연구용역 보고서 [2013]
  • 응용 및 사례: TRIZ (러시아의 창의적 문제해결 이론)의 창의적 지식경영에서의 응용
    이경원 이용규 지식경영연구 , 4(1), 79-92 [2003]
  • 실용TRIZ를 활용한 제품기획
  • 신제품 개념 개발에 TRIZ의 응용 사례. 한국반도체및디스플레이장비학회
    김익철 춘계학술대회 [2007]
  • 시그마 경영이해와 적용
    고두균 김상익 서한손 안병진 한국생산성본부 [1999]
  • 성공적인 문제해결 트리즈 컨설팅 Know-How
    한국트리즈학회정기학술대회 , 77-85 [2015]
  • 서비스 6시그마
    이장용 2(2) [2001]
  • 비기술분야의 문제해결을 위한 TRIZ-AHP 통합방법 연구 : 기업의물류 개선 사례 중심으로, 박사학위논문
    정수환 한성대학교 [2014]
  • 반도체 산업의 문서 중앙화 최적 모델 설계에 관한 연구, 박사학위논문
    조중현 명지대학교 [2014]
  • 모바일 관광정보 탐색과 구매의도: 계획행동과 기술수용의 통합모형 제안, 박사학위논문
    고기동 경기대학교 [2014]
  • 린6시그마(LSS)가 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구, 박사학위논문
    유선우 단국대학교 [2008]
  • 기술과 교육에서 TRIZ(창의적 문제해결 이론)의 적용 방안 탐색
    문대영 대한공업교육학회지 , 31(2), 155-176 [2006]
  • 국내 TRIZ 연구 동향 분석
    김태훈 박수진 왕유진 실과교육연구 ,17(2), 215-236 [2011]
  • 관광호텔의 경영성과평가를 위한 BSC 평가지표 간의 인과관계
    박정아 계명대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2001]
  • 박사
  • Wilson, D. D., & Collier, D. A. (2000). An empirical investigation of theMalcolm Baldrige National Quality Award causal model. DecisionSciences, 31(2), 361-383.
  • Wallace, L. G., & Sheetz, S. D. (2014). The adoption of software measures: Atechnology acceptance model (TAM) perspective. Information &Management, 51(2), 249-259.
  • Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of management review, 11(4), 801-814.
  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. John Wiley &Sons.
  • TRIZ를 활용한 창의적 문제해결방법
    전영록 GS인터비전 [2013]
  • TRIZ를 활용한 자동차 헤드램프의 습기제거
    신민수 유승현 이경원 한국자동차공학회 춘 추계 학술대회 논문집 , 1639-1644 [2007]
  • TRIZ를 이용한 전압측정용 탐침에 의한 전선피복 손상 방지 대책에 관한 연구
    곽윤기 김호종 한국반도체 및 디스플레이장비학회 춘계학술대회 [2007]
  • TRIZ(6SC)를 활용한 솔라 플라워의 창의적설계
    임사환 허용정 홍성도 반도체디스플레이기술학회 , 10(2), pp.19-23 [2011]
  • TRIZ 를 활용한 LPG 저장탱크의 시공방법 최적화방안
    임시환 허용정 한국가스학회 학술대회논문집 , 156-161 [2009]
  • TRIZ 를 이용한 취부용 피스제거 로봇 설계에 관한 연구
    정원지 주지훈 한국정밀공학회 학술발표대회 논문집 , 541-542 [2008]
  • TRIZ 를 이용한 도어트림 충격흡수구조 개발
    김호종 장익근 전오환 지성호 한국자동차공학회 지부 학술대회 논문집 , 54-60 [2007]
  • TRIZ 기법을 활용한 전지 격리막 변형 문제 해결
    김호종 이상호 한국반도체 및 디스플레이장비학회 [2007]
  • TRIZ 기법을 활용한 LCD 이송장치용우레탄 휠의 문제 해결에 관한 연구
    김호종 오재준 임사환 허용정 한국 CAD/CAM 학회 학술발표회 논문집 , 333-336 [2007]
  • Swartz, T. A., & Brown, S. W. (1989). Consumer and provider expectationsand experiences in evaluating professional service quality. Journal ofthe Academy of Marketing Science, 17(2), 189-195.
  • Sureshchandar, G. S., Rajendran, C., & Anantharaman, R. N. (2001). Aconceptual model for total quality management in serviceorganizations. Total quality management, 12(3), 343-363.
  • Stroh, P. (1987). Purposeful consulting. Organizational Dynamics, 16(1),49-67.
  • Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2012). Quality management re-visited: a reflectivereview and agenda for future research. Journal of operationsmanagement, 20(1), 91-109.
  • Souchkov, V. (1997). Accelerate innovation with TRIZ. Availablefrom:(accessed 30.11. 11).
  • Smith, V. L., & Font, X. (2014). Volunteer tourism, greenwashing andunderstanding responsible marketing using market signalling theory. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22(6), 942-963.
  • Schein, E. H. (1987). Process consultation: Lessons for managers andconsultants (Vol. 2). Reading: Addision-Wesley.
  • Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZmethodology of inventive problem solving. CRC Press.
  • Patton, M. Q., (1980), Qualitative Evaluation Methods, Beverly Hills, California:Sage Publication, Inc.
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L.L.(1988), Servqual. Journal of retailing, 64(1), 12-40
  • Pannenbacker, T. (2001). Methodisches Erfinden in Unternehmen-BedarfKonzept Perspektiven fur TRIZ-basierte Erfolge.
  • Oliver, R. L., Rust, R. T., & Varki, S. (1997). Customer delight: foundations, findings, and managerial insight. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 311-336.
  • Nunnally, J. C. Bernstein. IH (1994). Psychometric theory.
  • Nakagawa, T. (2001). Essence of TRIZ in 50 Words. TRIZ Journal,http://www. triz-journal. com.
  • Moon, J. W., &Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Webcontext. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
  • Moehrle, M. G. (2005). How combinations of TRIZ tools are used in companiesresults ? of a cluster analysis. R&D Management, 35(3), 285-296.
  • Mishra, U. (2013). The Ideal IFR is No IFR: Criticism to the TRIZ Concept ofIdeality. Available at SSRN 2282002.
  • McNair, C. J., Lynch, R. L., &Cross, K. F. (1990). Do financial and nonfinancialperformance measures have to agree. Management accounting, 72(5),28-36.
  • Mann, D., & Dewulf, S. (2002). Systematic win-win problem solving in abusiness environment. The TRIZ Journal.
  • Mallat, N., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V. K., & Oorni, A. (2009). The impact of usecontext on mobile services acceptance: The case of mobile ticketing. Information & management, 46(3), 190-195.
  • Livotov, P. (2008). TRIZ and Innovation management: Innovative productdevelopment and theory of inventive problem solving. INNOVATORTriS Europe, 1-30.
  • Lippitt, G. (1986). The Consulting Procession Action. San Digo: UniversityAssociates.
  • Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., &Rao, S. S. (2006). The impactof supply chain management practices on competitive advantage andorganizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107-124.
  • Lewis, R. C., &Booms, B. H. (1983). The marketing aspects of service quality. Emerging perspectives on services marketing, 65(4), 99-107.
  • Lee, T. R., Hsu, M. C., Dadura, A. M., & Ganesh, K. (2013). TRIZ applicationin marketing model to solve operational problems for Taiwaneseaquatic products with food traceability systems. Benchmarking: AnInternational Journal, 20(5), 625-646.
  • Lawrence, P. R., &Lorsch, J. W. (1969). Developing Organizations: Diagnosisand Action.
  • Kubr, M. (1993). How to select and use consultants: A client's guide (Vol. 74,No. 6703). International Labour Organisation.
  • Kolb, D. A., & Frohman, A. L. (1970). An Organization Development Approachto Consulting. Sloan management review, 12(1), 51-65.
  • James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis:Assumptions, models, and data (Vol. 1). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Jafari, M., Akhavan, P., Reza Zarghami, H., & Asgari, N. (2013). Exploring theeffectiveness of inventive principles of TRIZ on developingresearchers' innovative capabilities: A case study in an innovativeresearch center. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,24(5), 747-767.
  • Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D., &Phaal, R. (2013). A review of TRIZ, and itsbenefits and challenges in practice. Technovation, 33(2), 30-37.
  • Holdford, D., & Schulz, R. (1999). Effect of technical and functional quality onpatient perceptions of pharmaceutical service quality. Pharmaceuticalresearch, 16(9), 1344-1351.
  • Guiffrida, A. L., & Messina, M. J. (2015). Quality Control Techniques inServices Marketing. In Proceedings of the 1988 InternationalConference of Services Marketing (pp. 223-234). SpringerInternational Publishing.
  • Gronroos, C., & Gummerus, J. (2014). The service revolution and its marketingimplications: service logic vs service-dominant logic. Managing servicequality, 24(3), 206-229.
  • Gronroos, C. (1990). Marketing redefined. Management Decision, 28(8).
  • Gronroos (1990), Service Management and Marketing D. C, Health and Co.,Lexington.
  • Greiner, L. E. (1967). Patterns of organization change. Harvard BusinessReview.
  • Ghobadian, A., Speller, S., & Jones, M. (1994). Service quality: concepts andmodels. International Journal of Quality & ReliabilityManagement, 11(9), 43-66.
  • George, B. G (2012), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies forQualitative Research, Aldine Publishing Company, New York, NY.
  • Gazem, N., & Rahman, A. A. (2014). Improving TRIZ 40 Inventive PrinciplesGrouping in Redesign Service Approaches. Asian Social Science,10(17), p.127.
  • Gawyar, E. T. H., Ehsani, M., & Kozehchian, H. (2014). Measuring servicequality of state clubs in Lorestan province using SERVQUAL model. International Journal of Sport Studies, 4(2), 233-237.
  • Garvin, D. A. (1987). Competing on the 8 dimensions of quality. Harvardbusiness review, 65(6), 101-109.
  • Gallessich, J. (1982). The profession and practice of consultation. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: Anintroduction to theory and research.
  • Fey, V., & Rivin, E. (2005). Innovation on demand: new product developmentusing TRIZ. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ezickson, J. W. (2005). Deploying innovation and inventive thinking inorganisations applying TRIZ to non-technical ? fields of business. TRIZCON 2005. Available from:/http://www. aitriz. org/articles/InsideTRIZ/30393033-457A69636B736F6E. pdfS (accessed30.11. 11).
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4): 532-550.
  • Doyle, P. (2012). Setting business objectives and measuring performance. European Management Journal, 12(2), 123-132.
  • Domb, E., & Rantanen, K. (2008). Simplified TRIZ: New Problem SolvingApplications for Engineers and Manufacturing Professionals, 2nd ed.
  • Deming, W. E. (2012). Out of the crisis, Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology. Center for advanced engineering study, Cambridge, MA, 510.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and useracceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
  • Davis Jr, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testingnew end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoraldissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
  • Chen, Y. L. (2014). A Study on Student Self-efficacy and TechnologyAcceptance Model within an Online Task-based Learning Environment. Journal of Computers, 9(1), 34-43.
  • Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategicmanagement journal, 7(5), 437-458.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validationby the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological bulletin, 56(2), 81.
  • Benbasat, I., Dexter, A. S., & Mantha, R. W. (1980). Impact of organizationalmaturity on information system skill needs. MIS quarterly, 21-34.
  • Beckhard, R. (1969). Organization development: Strategies and models.
  • Angelini, A., & Bianchi, M. (2015). Service quality and profitability. Anempirical study about clients and financial advisors of the Allianz BankFA. International Journal of Management Cases, 17(4).
  • Altshuller, G. S. Creativity as an exact science. 1988. New York:Gordon and Breach.
  • Ajzen, I.(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  • Ahire, S. L., & Dreyfus, P. (2000). The impact of design management andprocess management on quality: an empirical investigation. Journal ofOperations Management, 18(5), 549-575.
  • Adam, E. E. (2009). Alternative quality improvement practices and organizationperformance. Journal of Operations Management, 12(1), 27-44.