연구동향 분석
박사

(The) right of publicity in context : a study focusing on notoriety aspects

김은실 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' (The) right of publicity in context : a study focusing on notoriety aspects' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • appropriation
  • freedom of expression
  • infamous persons
  • notoriety
  • notorious persons
  • persona
  • right of publicity
  • 악명자
  • 퍼블리시티권
  • 페르소나
  • 표현의 자유
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,086 0

0.0%

' (The) right of publicity in context : a study focusing on notoriety aspects' 의 참고문헌

  • _______, The Spring 1995 Horace S. Manges Lecture—The Human Persona as Commercial Property: The Right of Publicity, 19 COLUM.-VLA J.L. & ARTS 129(1995).
  • _______, The Right to Speak from Times to Time: First Amendment Theory Applied to Libel and Misapplied to Privacy, 56 CALIF. L. REV. 935 (1968).
  • _______, The Emergence of Hollywood Ghosts on Korean TVs: The Right of Publicity from the Global Market Perspective, 19 PAC. RIM L. & POL’Y J. 487 (2010).
  • _______, The Descendibility of the Right of Publicity: Is There Life After Death?, 89 YALE L. J. 1133 (1980).
  • _______, Roberta Rosenthal, Fame, 73 IND. L.J. 1 (1997).
  • _______, Reconciling Theory and Doctrine in First Amendment Jurisprudence, 88 CALIF. L. REV. 2353 (2000).
  • _______, Public Personas and Private Property: The Commercialization of Human Identity, 79 TRADEMARK REP. 681, 697 (1989).
  • _______, Privacy in Tort Law--Were Warren and Brandeis Wrong?, 31 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 326 (1966).
  • _______, Philosophical Backgrounds of Publicity Rights II, JUSTICE, Vol. 98, p. 86 (2007).
  • _______, Philosophical Backgrounds of Publicity Rights I, JUSTICE, Vol. 98, p. 135 (2007).
  • _______, How to Write a Life: Some Thoughts on Fixation and the Copyright/Privacy Divide, 51 WM. & MARY L. REV. 826, 840 (2009).
  • _______, First Amendment Doctrine and the Burger Court, 68 CAL. L. REV. 422 (1980).
  • _______, A Perspective on Human Dignity, the First Amendment, and the Right of Publicity, 50 B.C. L. REV. 1345 (2009).
  • Warren, Samuel D. and Brandeis, Louis D., The Right to Privacy, 4 HARV. L. REV. 193 (1890).
  • Wade, John W., Developing Trends in the Tort Action for Invasion of the Right of Privacy, 16 VA. L. WEEKLY DICTA COMP. 7 (1965).
  • Volokh, Eugene, Freedom of Speech and the Right of Publicity, 40 HOUSTON L. REV. 904 (2003).
  • Vick, Kevin L. and Jassy, Jean-Paul, Why a Federal Right of Publicity Statute is Necessary, 28 COMM. LAWYER 14 (2011).
  • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, A GUIDE TO EQUITABLE SHARING OF FEDERALLY FORFEITED PROPERTY FOR STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES (March 1994).
  • Tushnet, Rebecca, A Mask That Eats into the Face: Images and the Right of Publicity, 38 COLUM. J.L. & ARTS 157, 157 (2015).
  • Sims, Andrew B., Right of Publicity: Survivability Reconsidered, 49 FORDHAM L. REV. 453 (1981).
  • Shields, Debra A., The Constitutionality of Current Crime Victimization Statutes: A Survey, 4 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 930 (1993).
  • Savell, Lawrence Edward, Right of Privacy: History and Scope in New York, 48 ALB. L. REV. 1, 14 (1983).
  • Samuelson, Pamela, Reviving Zacchini: Analyzing First Amendment Defenses in Right of Publicity and Copyright Cases, 57 TUL. L. REV. 836, 841 (1982).
  • STRAUBHAAR, ROBERT LAROSE AND DAVENPORT, LUCINDA, MEDIA NOW: UNDERSTANDING MEDIA, CULTURE, AND TECHNOLOGY 91 (7th ed. 2011).
  • SMOLLA, RODNEY A., SMOLLA & NIMMER ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH (2013).
  • Rothman, Jennifer E., Copyright Preemption and the Right of Publicity, 36 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 199 (2002).
  • Rodrigues, Usha, Race to the Stars: A Federalism Argument for Leaving the Right of Publicity in the Hands of the States, 87 VIRGINIA L. REV. 1201 (2001).
  • Robinson, Richard S., Preemption, the Right of Publicity, and a New Federal Statute, 16 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 183 (1998).
  • Ravina, Mark, Introduction: Conceptualizing the Korean Wave, 31 SOUTH REVIEW OF ASIAN STUDIES 3 (2009).
  • Radin, Margaret Jane, Property and Personhood, 34 STAN. L. REV. 957 (1981) (quoting L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations 178 (G. Anscombe trans. 3d ed. 1958).
  • Prosser, William L., Privacy, 48 CALIF. L. REV. 383, 393 (1960).
  • Post, Robert C., Rereading Warren and Brandeis: Privacy, Property, and Appropriation, 41 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 647 (1990).
  • Posner, Richard A., The Right of Privacy, 12 GA. L. REV. 393 (1978).
  • Pomerantz, Jason S, Have Courts Intruded on First Amendment Guarantees in Their Zeal to Ensure That Crimes Does Not Pay?, 11 LOY. L. ENT. L. REV. 505 (1991).
  • Pilpel, Harriet F., The Right of Publicity-The Tenth Donald C. Brace Memorial Lecture, 27 BULL. COPYRIGHT SOC’Y U.S.A. 249, 256 (1979).
  • Pejovic, Caslav, Civil Law and Common Law: Two Different Paths Leading to the Same Goal, 32 VICTORIA UNIV. WELLINGTON L. REV. 817 (2001).
  • Park, Gi-seung, Kang, Ho-soon says “I will write a book to leave my sons publishing profits.” Yonhap News, Feb. 3, 2009.
  • O’Brien, Denis, The Right of Privacy, 2 COLUMB. L. REV. 437-448 (1902).
  • Nimmer, Melville B., The Right of Publicity, 19 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 203 (1954).
  • Nathanson, Michell, What’s In a Name or, Better Yet, What’s It Worth? Cities, Sports Teams and the Right of Publicity, 58 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 168 (2007).
  • Nam, Hyung-Doo, New Approach to Entertainment Law: Understanding from the Perspectives of Its Subjects, KOREAN ASSN OF CIVIL LAW, Vol. 35, p. 299 (2007).
  • Nam, Hyung Doo, The Right of Publicity in the Global Market: Is James Dean A Living Dead Even In Korea? (2005) (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington) (on file with University of Washington Library).
  • NAM, HYUNG DOO, A STUDY ON THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY AND ITS LEGISLATIVE PROTECTION, MINISTRY OF CULTURE, SPORTS AND TOURISM REPORT (2011).
  • Mensel, Robert E., “Kodakers Lying in Wait”: Amateur Photography and the Right of Privacy New York, 43 AM. Q. 24, fn. 24 (1991).
  • McCarthy, J. Thomas, Melville B. Nimmer and the Right of Publicity: A Tribute, 34 UCLA L. REV. 1703, 1704 (1986).
  • Mauro, Joseph C., Rethinking Murderabilia: How States Can Restrict Some Depictions of Crime as They Restrict Child Pornography, 22 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 323 (2012).
  • Madow, Michael, Private Ownership of Public Image: Popular Culture and Publicity Rights, 81 CALIF. L. REV. 127 (1993).
  • MERGES, ROBERT P., JUSTIFYING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 35 (2011).
  • MEIKLEJOHN, ALEXANDER, POLITICAL FREEDOM: THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS OF THE PEOPLE (1965).
  • MCCARTHY, J. THOMAS, THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY AND PRIVACY (2d ed. 2012).
  • MASON, ALPHEUS THOMAS, BRANDEIS: A FREE MAN'S LIFE (1946).
  • Lauzon, Elizabeth D., Validity, Construction, and Application of Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C.A. 1125(d), 177 A.L.R. Fed. 1 (2002).
  • Lapter, Alain J., How the Other Half Lives (Revisited): Twenty Years Since Midler v. Ford A Global Perspective on the Right of Publicity, 15 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 239 (2007).
  • LaFrance, Mary & Cline, Gail H., Identical Cousins?: On the Road with Dilution and the Right of Publicity, 24 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 641 (2007).
  • LOCKE, JOHN, TWO TREATISES OF GOVERNMENT (P. Laslett ed. 1968).
  • LEE, EUN-YOUNG, ADDICTED-TO-MURDER (Chosun Monthly Publishing, 2005).
  • Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal, The Right of Publicity vs. the First Amendment: A Property and Liability Rule Analysis, 70 IND. L.J. 47, at 55 (1994).
  • Kim, Jong Hwan, Injury as an Act of Coercion, CASE STUDIES ON CRIMINAL LAW, Vol. 17, p. 266 (2009).
  • Kessler, Frederick R., A Common Law for the Statutory Era: The Right of Publicity and New York’s Right of Privacy Statute, 15 FORDHAM URBAN L.J. 951, 959 (1986)
  • Keren-Paz, Yitzchak, A Notoriety-based Justification for the “Son of Sam” Legislation (1998) (unpublished LL.M. Thesis, University of Toronto) (on file with University of Toronto).
  • Kealy, Sean J., A Proposal for a New Massachusetts Notoriety-for-Profit Law: The Grandson of Sam, 22 W. NEW. ENG. L. REV. 1 (2000).
  • Kalven, Harry Jr., The New York Times Case: A Note on “The Central Meaning of the First Amendment,” 1964 SUP. CT. REV. 191 (1964).
  • KLAUSNER, LAWRENCE D., SON OF SAM: BASED ON THE AUTHORIZED TRANSCRIPTION OF THE TAPES, OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS AND DAIRIES OF DAVID BERKOWITZ (1981).
  • KEETON, P. & PROSSER, W. L., PROSSER AND KEETON ON THE LAW OF TORTS 850 (1984).
  • Jaeger, Jessica, Investigating New York's 2001 Son of Sam Law: Problems with the Recent Extension of Tort Liability for People Convicted of Crime, 48 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 433 (2004).
  • Hurley, Ellen, Overkill: An Exaggerated Response to the Sale of Murderabilia, 42 IND. L. REV. 411 (2009).
  • Howe, Kathleen, Note, Is Free Speech Too High a Price to Pay for Crime? Overcoming the Constitutional Inconsistencies in Son of Sam Laws, 24 LOYOLA. ENT. L. REV. 341 (2004).
  • Hoffman, Steven J., Limitations on the Right of Publicity, BULL. COPYRIGHT SOC’Y U.S.A. 111 (1980).
  • Heymann, Laura A., The Trademark/Copyright Divine, 60 S.M.U. L. REV. 55 (2007).
  • Halpern, Sheldon W., The Right of Publicity: Maturation of an Independent Right Protecting the Associative Value of Personality, 46 HASTINGS L.J. 853, 856-57 (1995).
  • HEGEL, GEORG, PHILOSOPHY OF RIGHT (S. W. Dyde trans. 1821).
  • Gormely, Ken, One Hundred Years of Privacy, 1992 WIS. L. REV. 1335 (1992). Haemmerli, Alice, Whose Who? The Case for a Kantian Right of Publicity, 49 DUKE L.J. 383 (1999).
  • Gordon, Harold R., Right of Property in Name, Likeness, Personality and History, 55 NW. U. L. REV. 553, 554 (1960).
  • Goldman, Lee, Elvis is Alive, But He Shouldn't Be: The Right of Publicity Revisited, 1992 BYU L. Rev. 597(1992).
  • Gajda, Amy, What if Samuel D. Warren Hadn't Married A Senator's Daughter?: Uncovering the Press Coverage That Led to “The Right of Privacy,” 2008 MICH. ST. L. REV. 35, 41-42 (2008).
  • Fried, David J., Rationalizing Criminal Forfeiture, 79 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 328, 428-29 (1998).
  • Fowler, Stephen Reginald, Note, Taking a Bite out of Michael Vick’s Publicity Rights: An Analysis of How the Right of Publicity Should be Treated After a Celebrity is Convicted of a Crime, 16 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 109 (2008).
  • Felcher, Peter L. and Rubin, Edward L., Privacy, Publicity, and the Portrayal of Real People by the Media, 88 YALE L.J. 1577 (1979).
  • Epstein, Richard A., Privacy, Property Rights, and Misrepresentations, 12 GA. L. REV. 455, 462 (1978).
  • Emerson, Thomas I., Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment, 72 YALE L.J. 877 (1962).
  • Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, We Are Symbols and Inhabit Symbols, So Should We Be Paying Rent? Deconstructing the Lanham Act and Rights of Publicity, 20 COLUM.-VLA J.L. & ARTS 123 (1996).
  • Dougherty, F. Jay, Symposium: International Rights of Publicity, Foreword: The Right of Publicity-Towards a Comparative and International Perspective, 18 LOY. L.A. ENT. L.J. 421 (1998).
  • Dogan, Stacey L. and Lemley, Mark A., What the Right of Publicity Can Learn from Trademark Law, 58 STAN. L. REV. 1190 (2006).
  • De Grandpre, Vincent M., Understanding the Market for Celebrity: An Economic Analysis for the Right of Publicity, 12 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 73, 80-81 (2001).
  • Cotter, Thomas F. and Dmitrieva, Irina Y., Integrating the Right of Publicity with First Amendment and Copyright Preemption Analysis, 33 COLUM. J. L. & ARTS 165 (2010).
  • Coats, William Sloan and et al., The Right of Publicity & Celebrity Licensing, PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE (October-December 2011).
  • Cianfrone, Beth A. and Baker III, Thomas A., The Use of Student-Athlete Likeness in Sport Video Games: An Application of the Right of Publicity, 20 J. LEGAL ASPECTS SPORTS 35 (2010).
  • Cassell, Paul G., Crime Shouldn't Pay: A Proposal to Create an Effective and Constitutional Federal Anti-Profiting Statute, 19 FED. SENT'G REP. 119 (2006).
  • Case Note, Property Law-Right Of Publicity--Ninth Circuit Upholds Washington Statute Recognizing Postmortem Rights Of Individuals Domiciled Out Of State-Experience Hendrix L.L.C. v. Hendrixlicensing.Com Ltd, 762 F.3d 829 (9th Cir. 2014), 128 HARV. L. REV. 1842 (2015).
  • Case Note, In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation, 724 F.3d 1268 (9th Cir. 2013), 127 HARV. L. REV. 1212, 1217 (2014).
  • Case Comment, An Assessment of the Copyright Model in Right of Publicity Cases, 70 CAL. L. REV. 786 (1982).
  • Burnett, Barbara A., The Property Right of Publicity and the First Amendment: Popular Culture and the Commercial Persona, 3 HOFSTRA PROP. L.J. 171 (1989).
  • Brennan, William J. Jr., The Supreme Court and the Meiklejohn Interpretation of the First Amendment, 79 HARV. L. REV. 1 (1965).
  • Bloustein, Edward J., Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser, 39 N.Y.U. L. REV. 962, 986 (1964).
  • Bloomgarden, Joshua, Note, Share His Dream: A Fair Uses Standards for Historico-Political Figures’ Rights of Publicity, 31 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 149, 155 (2012).
  • Beard, Joseph J., Clones, Bones and Twilight Zones: Protecting the Digital Persona of the Quick, The Dead and the Imaginary, 49 J. COPYRIGHT SOC’Y U.S.A. 441 (2001).
  • BOORSTIN, DANIEL J., THE IMAGE: A GUIDE TO PSEUDO-EVENTS IN AMERICA (New York Random House, 1992).
  • BLACK, GILLIAN, PUBLICITY RIGHTS AND IMAGE (Hart Publishing 2011).
  • Adams, Ben C., Inheritability of the Right of Publicity Upon the Death of the Famous, 33 VAND. L. REV. 1251, 1252 (1980).