박사

Focus-on-form instruction, corrective feedback types, language anxiety and the acquisition of english grammar by low-proficiency Korean college students = 형태초점 교수활동과 오류수정 피드백 형태 및 언어불안 정도가 초급영어수준인 대학생들의 영어문법습득에 미치는 영향

황희정 2015년
논문상세정보
' Focus-on-form instruction, corrective feedback types, language anxiety and the acquisition of english grammar by low-proficiency Korean college students = 형태초점 교수활동과 오류수정 피드백 형태 및 언어불안 정도가 초급영어수준인 대학생들의 영어문법습득에 미치는 영향' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • corrective feedback
  • form-focused instruction
  • input-based
  • language anxiety
  • output-based
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
61 0

0.0%

' Focus-on-form instruction, corrective feedback types, language anxiety and the acquisition of english grammar by low-proficiency Korean college students = 형태초점 교수활동과 오류수정 피드백 형태 및 언어불안 정도가 초급영어수준인 대학생들의 영어문법습득에 미치는 영향' 의 참고문헌

  • and Ranta (1997): Where do we stand today? Foreign Language Teaching, 6(1), 21-31
  • Yang, M. R. (2004). A comparison of the efficacy between input-based instruction and output-based instruction in focus on form. English Teaching, 59(2), 145-164.
  • Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC Journal, 37, 308-328.
  • Williams, J. (2005). Learning with awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 269-304.
  • Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49(4), 583-625.
  • Williams, J. (1995). Focus on form in communicative language teaching: Research findings and the classroom teacher. TESOL Journal, 4(4), 12-16.
  • Williams, J. & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 139-155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-161.
  • White, L. (1989b). The adjacency condition on case assignment: Do learners observe the subset principle? In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 134-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, L. (1989a). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • White, J. (1998). Getting learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, A. (2011). The effectiveness of repeating dictogloss in promoting new vocabulary noticing. English Teaching, 66(1), 65-90.
  • Weslander, D & Stephany, G. (1983). Evaluation of an English as a second language program for Southeast Asian students. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 473-80.
  • Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wall, D., & Alderson, J. C. (1993). Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing, 10(1), 41-69.
  • Villamil, O. & de Guerrero, M. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 491-514.
  • VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and practice (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 495-510.
  • VanPatten, B., & Cardierno, T. (1993b). SLA as input processing: A role for instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
  • VanPatten, B., & Cardierno, T. (1993a). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 45-57.
  • Tsui, A. B. M. & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147-170.
  • Truscott, J. (1999). What's wrong with oral grammar correction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437-455.
  • Trahey, M. (1996). Positive evidence in second language acquisition: Some long term effects. Second Language Research, 12, 111-139.
  • Trahey, M & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181-204.
  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Swain, M. (1985), Communicative competence: Some roles ofcomprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development.In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition(pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Spielmann, G. & Radnofsky, M. L. (2001). Learning language under tension: New directions from a qualitative study. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 259-278.
  • Spielberger, C. D. & Vagg, P. (1995). Test anxiety: A transactional process model, test anxiety theory, assessment, and treatment. Washington D.C.: Taylor & Francis.
  • Sparks, R. L. & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning differences: Affective or native language aptitude differences? The Modern Language Journal, 75, 3-16.
  • Spada, N. (2007). International handbook of English language teaching. New York: Springer US.
  • Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-224.
  • Song, Y. H. & Park, M. R. (2012). The effects of focus on form instruction on the learning of English verb tenses. English Language & Literature Teaching, 18(4), 361-384.
  • Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. London: Springer.
  • Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 835-874.
  • Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255-283.
  • Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263-300.
  • Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159-169.
  • Seong, S. H. & Lee, S. K. (2013). Effects of the different levels of explicitness of focus-on-form techniques on the acquisition of the relative clauses by Korean middle school English learners. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 13(3), 549-570.
  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.
  • Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schwartz, B. (1986). The epistemological status of second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 2, 120-159.
  • Schmidt, R. (1995). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
  • Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second languagelearning. Applied Linguistics, 11: 129-158.
  • Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 23-45). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
  • Salaberry, R. (1998). On input processing, true language competence, and pedagogical bandwagons: A reply to Sanz and VanPatten. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2), 274-285.
  • Salaberry, R. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(2), 422-451.
  • Rutherford, W. (1989). Preemption and the learning of L2 grammars. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 441-457.
  • Rutherford, W. & Sharwood Smith, W. (1988). Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
  • Russell, V. (2009). Corrective feedback, over a decade of research since Lyster
  • Russell, J. & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. N. L. Ortega (Ed.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Rodriguez, A. G. (2009). Teaching grammar to adult English language learners: Focus on form. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
  • Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45-99.
  • Robinson, P. (1996b). Learning simple and complex rules under implicit, incidental rule-search conditions, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-67.
  • Robinson, P. (1996a). Consciousness, rules, and instructed second language acquisition. New York/Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  • Richards, J. C. & Rogers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Radecki, P. M. & Swales, J. M. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, 16(3), 355-365.
  • Quirk, P., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Startvik, F. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
  • Putlack, M. A. (2009). Reading plus (3). Seoul: AceME Ltd.
  • Putlack, M. A. (2009). Reading plus (2). Seoul: AceME Ltd.
  • Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Platt, J., Platt, H., & Richards, J. C. (1992). Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Essex: Longman.
  • Pienemann, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 23-75). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: what does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
  • Pavlenko, A. (2005). Emotions and multilingualism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265-289.
  • Park, J. J. & Lee, H. K. (2009). A study of the effect of dictogloss in middle school English classes. Foreign Languages Education, 16(1), 147-171.
  • Panova, I. & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573-595.
  • Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.
  • Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 459-481.
  • Oliver, R. & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 519-533.
  • Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
  • Nobuyoshi, J & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks. ELT Journal, 47, 203-210.
  • Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2007). Issues in form-focused instruction and teacher education. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education (pp. 7-16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145.
  • Nakamori, T. (2002). Teaching relative clauses: How to handle a bitter lemon for Japanese learners and English teachers. ELT Journal, 56(1), 29-40.
  • Nagata, N. (1998). Input vs. output practice in educational software for second language acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 23-40.
  • Nabei, I. & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43-63.
  • Murray, H. (1994). Inside dictogloss - An investigation of a small group writing task. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique, 60, 67-84.
  • Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.
  • Mayo, M. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 156-175.
  • Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471-497.
  • Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
  • Mackey, A. & Philip, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338-356.
  • MacIntyre, P. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D. J. Young (Ed.) Affect in foreign language and second language learning (pp. 101-198). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  • MacIntyre, P. & Gardner, R. (1994). The subtle effects of induced anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44, 283-305.
  • MacIntyre, P. & Gardner, R. (1991b). Language anxiety: its relationship to other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language Learning, 41, 513-534.
  • MacIntyre, P. & Gardner, R. (1991a). Methods and results in the study of foreign language anxiety: A review of the literature. Language Learning, 41, 85-117.
  • Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399-432.
  • Lyster, R. (1998b). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
  • Lyster, R. (1998a). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Aquisition, 20(1), 51-81.
  • Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
  • Lyster, R. & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and interactional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269-300.
  • Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 357-371.
  • Long, M. (2006). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. R. Ritchie & T. J. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg & C. Kramsc (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
  • Long, M. (1983c). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359-382.
  • Long, M. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classrooms. In M. Clarke & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL '82. Washington D.C.: TESOL.
  • Long, M. (1983a). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
  • Long, M. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lochtman, K. (2000). The role of negative feedback in experiential vs. analytical foreign language teaching. Paper presented at the Conference on instructed second language learning. Br ssel, Belgium.
  • Lightbown, P. (2002). Anniversary article: Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21, 431-462.
  • Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C.Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom secondlanguage acquisition. (pp. 177-196). Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, L., Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating attention to form with meaning: Focus on form in content-based Spanish instruction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 217-258). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and L2 development: beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
  • Lee, W. H. (2012). Teaching English grammar in an EFL setting with focus on the importance of the choice of forms and timing of focus on form. The New Studies of English Language & Literature, 53, 241-257.
  • Lee, S. K. & Huang, H. T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 307-331.
  • Lantolf, J. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79-96.
  • Lantolf, J. & Throne, S. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 197-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lantolf, J. & Aljaarfreh, A. (1995). Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 619-632.
  • LaPierre, D. (1994). Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Toronto, Toronto.
  • Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. (2002). The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 343-358.
  • Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
  • Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Krashen, S. & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach. New York: Pergamon.
  • Kleinmann, H. (1978). The strategy of avoidance in adult second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications (pp. 157-174). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Kinginger, C. (2002). Defining the zone of proximal development in US foreign language education. Applied Linguistics, 23, 240-261.
  • Kim, S. J. & Ma, J. H. (2014). The effects of dictation and dictogloss in the high school English class: Focusing on English collocation. English 21, 27(1), 259-278.
  • Kim, B. J. (2007). The effects of different types of form-focused instruction on Korean university students' writing accuracy. English Language & Literature Teaching, 13(2), 63-90.
  • Kang, M. K. (2007). An effective strategy on teaching and learning English tense in the EFL education. English Language & Literature, 13(3), 133-156.
  • Kang, D. H. (2011). Noticing and L2 learning in input-based focus-on-form instruction. Foreign Language Education, 18(2), 29-49.
  • Kang, D. H. (2003). Focus on form instructions and L2 learners' instructional preferences. Foreign Language Education, 10(1), 57-82.
  • Johnson, K. (2001). An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Jin, S. H. (2013). A study on the effects of dictogloss on English writing in Korean middle school. Studies in English Education 18(2), 115-134.
  • Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  • Jang. S. (2012). Types of information in written corrective feedback and its efficacy on L2 acquisition. English Teaching, 67(3), 3-25.
  • Jang, S. (2011). Corrective feedback and language anxiety in L2 processing and achievement. English Teaching, 66(2), 73-99.
  • Jacob, G. M., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Heung, S. (1998). Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3). 307-318.
  • Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing on the hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421-452.
  • Izumi, S. & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239-278.
  • Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects of L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-36.
  • Hwang, J. B. (2001). Focus on form and the L2 learning of English unaccusative verbs. English Teaching, 56(3), 111-133.
  • Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-132.
  • Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21, 112-126.
  • Horwitz, E. (2000). It ain't over till it's over: On foreign language anxiety, first language deficits, and the confounding variables. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 256-259.
  • Horwitz, E. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 119-129). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
  • Horwitz, E. (1986). Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of a foreign language anxiety scale. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 559-562.
  • Hong, J. (2006). The effects of two focus-on-form techniques on the acquisition of the tense-aspect system. Foreign Language Education, 13(3), 161-186.
  • Hinkel, E. (2002). Teaching grammar in writing classes: Tenses and cohesion. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 181-198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hendrickson, J. M. (1980). The treatment of error in written work. The Modern Language Journal, 64, 216-221.
  • Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. (1997). The partial availability of UG in second language acquisition. The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research 13, 187-226.
  • Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 255-270.
  • Havranek, G. (1999). The effectiveness of corrective feedback: Preliminary results of an empirical study. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangere, 2, 189-206.
  • Havranek, G. & Cesnik, H. (2001). Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. In S. Foster-Cohen & A. Nizegorodzew (Eds.), EUROSLA yearbook Volume I (pp. 99-122). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Harley, B. (1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 245-260.
  • Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
  • Han, Y. (2007). Exploring task effects: Focus on form in dictogloss and grammar-discovery tasks. The New Korean Journal of English Language and Literature, 49(2), 195-215.
  • Goldstein, L. M. & Conrad, S. M. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 443-460.
  • Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction and second language learner. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Gass, S. (1991). Grammar instruction, selective attention, and learning. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, and M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/Second language pedagogy research (pp. 134-141). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second-language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 323-351.
  • Flynn, S. W. (1989). The role of the head-initial/head-final parameter in the acquisition of English relative clauses by adult Spanish and Japanese speakers. In S. M. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 89-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott 1996. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-10.
  • Ely, C. (1986). An analysis of discomfort, risktaking, sociability, and motivation in the L2 classroom. Language Learning, 36, 1-25.
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ellis, R. (2001). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University.
  • Ellis, R. (1999). Input-based approaches to teaching grammar: A review of classroom-oriented research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 64-80.
  • Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 87-106.
  • Ellis, R. (1993). Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91-113.
  • Ellis, R. (1991d). Second language acquisition and second language pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Ellis, R. (1991c). Grammaticality judgements and learner variability. In R. Burmeister & P. Rounds (Ed.), Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the tenth meeting of the second language research forum (pp. 25-60). Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon: Department of Linguistics.
  • Ellis, R. (1991b). Grammaticality judgements and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 161-186.
  • Ellis, R. (1991a). The interaction hypothesis: A critical evaluation. In E. Sadtono (Ed.), Language acquisition and the second/foreign language classroom (p. 179). Singapore: RELC.
  • Ellis, R. & He, X. (1999). The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 319-333.
  • Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Doughty, C. (1994). Fine-tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Round Table – Strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, and research, Washington, D.C.
  • Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study on SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
  • Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Doughty, C. & Varela, J. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dekeyser, R. (2007). Practice in a second language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dekeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dekeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: automatizing secondlanguage morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19,195-221.
  • Dekeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379-410.
  • Dekeyser, R. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 501-514.
  • De la Fuente, M. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81-112.
  • De Guerrero, M. & Villamil, O. (1994). Social cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 484-496.
  • D rnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cook, Guy. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Connor, U. & Asenavage. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 257-276.
  • Chung, H. & Kim, D. (2008). Effects of input processing and output-enriched consciousness-raising instruction on learning different types of English verb forms. English Language Teaching, 20(3), 27-48.
  • Choi, S. Y. (2009). The effects of form focused instruction based on three functions of output, Unpublished master's thesis. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. Seoul.
  • Cheng, Y., Horwitz, E., & Schallert, D. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49, 417-446
  • Cheng, Y. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 313-335.
  • Chastain, K. (1975). Affective and ability factors in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 25, 153-161.
  • Chandler, J. (2004). A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 345-348.
  • Casado, M. A. & Dereshiwsky, M. I. (2001). Foreign language anxiety of university students. College Student Journal, 35(4), 539-551.
  • Carroll, S., Swain, M., & Roberge, Y. (1992). The role of feedback in adult second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalizations. Applied Pyscholinguistics, 13, 173-198.
  • Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Carroll, S. (1997). The irrelevance of verbal feedback to language learning. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp. 73-88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Carroll, S. & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.
  • Braidi, S. M. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interaction. Language Learning, 52(1), 1-42.
  • Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-258.
  • Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the pass compos and the imparfait. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 226-243.
  • Arnold, J. & Brown, H. D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in Language Learning (pp. 1-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Anton, M. (1999). A learner-centered classroom: sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 303-318.
  • Aljaafreh, A. & Landolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Edinburgh course in applied linguistics Volume 3. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.