연구동향 분석
박사

중학교 영재교육대상자를 위한 로봇 주제 중심의 TEAMS 통합 교육 프로그램 개발 = The developments of TEAMS integrative educational programs based on ‘robot’ theme-centered for the gifted education in secondary school.

김성애 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 중학교 영재교육대상자를 위한 로봇 주제 중심의 TEAMS 통합 교육 프로그램 개발 = The developments of TEAMS integrative educational programs based on ‘robot’ theme-centered for the gifted education in secondary school.' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • teams교육
  • 로봇교육
  • 영재교육
  • 주제중심
  • 통합교육
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,041 0

0.0%

' 중학교 영재교육대상자를 위한 로봇 주제 중심의 TEAMS 통합 교육 프로그램 개발 = The developments of TEAMS integrative educational programs based on ‘robot’ theme-centered for the gifted education in secondary school.' 의 참고문헌

  • 학습부진아를 위한 로봇활용 STEAM교육이 과학흥미와 자기효능감에 미치는 영향
    유현상,이철현 실과교육연구,21(1),17-33 [2015]
  • 통합교육과정의 유형
    김종건 교육과정연구 ,12,95-108 [2005]
  • 통합교육과정 접근으로서의``융합인재교육 (STEAM)의 의미와 실천 가능성 탐색
    김경자 이경진 초등교육연구,25(3),55-81 [2012]
  • 통합교육과정
    김재복 서울:교육과학사 [2007]
  • 통합 교육과정의 구성방법. 통합교육과정의 이론과 실제
    곽병선 서울:교육과학사 [1983]
  • 통섭적 교육 활동을 위한 교육용 로봇의 활용 방안 탐색
  • 컴퓨터교과교육: 초, 중등 학생의 로봇교육을 위한 수학, 과학과 교육과정 연계 로봇 소양 교육과정 개발
    김미량 신승용 조혜경 컴퓨터교육학회논문지,16(6),55-70 [2013]
  • 초등학생을 위한 스토리텔링 기반 로봇 프로그래밍 교육 시스템
    성영훈 이재인 정보교육학회논문지,15(2),295-305 [2011]
  • 초등학교에서의 로봇 교육에 관한 연구. 한국실과교육학회지.16(4)
    강종표 한국실과교육학회,97-113 [2003]
  • 초등학교에서 로봇활용실험이 과학탐구능력에 미치는 효과
    김철 정보교육학회논문지,15(4),625-634 [2011]
  • 초등학교 통합교육과정의 통합유형 분석.미간행 박사학위 논문,한국교원대학교
    배건 충북 [1997]
  • 초등학교 통합교육과정 운영에 관한 교사의 의사결정과 관련변인.미간행박사학위논문,연세대학교
    김인숙 서울 [1995]
  • 초등학교 방과후학교 로봇교실 운영실태 분석
    이태준 한정혜 정보교육학회논문지,14(1),25-33 [2010]
  • 초등학교 1- 2학년 주제 중심 통합교육과정 교수모델 정립과 예시 지도안 개발에 관한 연구.서울:교육부. 영재 교육 진흥법
    강충렬 신헌재 법률 제12844호,2014.11.19 [1998]
  • 초등 정보영재를 위한 로봇프로그래밍 교육과정 개발,한국정보교육학회 하계학술대회 한국정보교육학회
    김신엽 유인환 한국,173-178 [2007]
  • 초등 실과교과의 기술영역 교육을 위한 예비교사 대상의 로봇 활용 교육 과정안 개발
    박광렬 한국실과교육학회지,21(1),273-296 [2008]
  • 창의적 융합인재 양성을 위한 과제
    김왕동 STEPIInsight,67,1-31 [2011]
  • 중학생을 위한 STEAM 교육 프로그램의개발
    김동하 이은상 최유현 한국기술교육학회지,13(1),152-177 [2013]
  • 중학교 기술 교과에서의 “로봇”활용 교육 방안
    김성애 정동양 한국기술교육학회지,6(3),127-147 [2006]
  • 주제중심 교수모델 정립에 관한 연구
    강충렬 초등교육연구,12(1),5-29 [1998]
  • 주제 중심 통합적 접근에 의한 기술교과 교육 프로그램 개발.미간행 박사학위 논문,한국교원대학교
    이상갑 충북 [2001]
  • 제 6 차 '슬기로운 생활' 통합교육과정의 실행형태 분석
    이미숙 초등교육 연구,12(1),43-61 [1998]
  • 전문계 고등학교 학생을 위한 로봇 활용문제 중심 프로그래밍 교수-학습 설계
    권구봉 서영민 이영준 교원교육,28(3),53-65 [2012]
  • 영재를 위한 통합교육과정 개발의 방향: Drake 모형의 적용 가능성 탐색
    노일순 이경진 영재교육연구,24(2),217-241 [2014]
  • 영재 교육 진흥법 시행령
    대통령령 제25532호 [2014]
  • 연구논문: 과학 영재학생과 일반 학생은 창의성에서 어떻게 다른가?-서울대학교 과학영재교육센터 학생들을 중심으로
    박병건 신지은 정현철 최승언 한기순 한국과학교육학회지,22(1),158-175 [2002]
  • 실과에서 로봇활용이 학습자의 문제해결력에 미치는 효과
    송정범 이태욱 전윤주 실과교육연구,14(4),209-224 [2008]
  • 실과 기술 영역 기반 로봇교육프로그램이 초등학생의 기술적 태도에 미치는 효과
    배선아 교육논총,34(1),183-203 [2014]
  • 서울대학교 교육연구소교육학 용어 사전(19판)
    서울:도서출판 하우 [2014]
  • 문제기반학습에 터한 로봇제어프로그래밍 수업이 중학생 논리적 사고력에 미치는 효과. 미간행 박사학위 논문. 한국교원대학교
    이좌택 충북 [2004]
  • 로봇의 교육적 활용을 위한 교육 프로그램 모형 개발
    최유현 한국실과교육학회지,16(3),75-90 [2002]
  • 로봇과 학습의 관계 맺기: 초,중,고등학생의 관점에서
    김상아 신나민 교육정보미디어연구,13(3),79-99 [2007]
  • 로봇'을 주제로 한 기술교과 교육프로그램 개발
    이상갑 한국기술교육학회지,2(1),17-36 [2002]
  • 대통령자문 교육혁신위원회역대정부 대통령위원회 교육개혁보고서(V-1)(참여정부'03.12-'06.9)
    서울:대통령자문 교육혁신위원회 [2006]
  • 남길현 초등정보과학영재를 위한 로봇교육과정의 설계 및검증
    이재호 영재 교육연구,19(3),669-695 [2009]
  • 기술교육의 새로운 통합교육 방법인 STEM 교육의 탐색
    김진수 한국기술교육학회지,7(3),1～29 [2007]
  • 교육과정의 통합적 접근에 관한 연구. 미간행 박사학위논문,동국대학교
    김재복 서울 [1983]
  • 교육+로봇:비전과 액션플랜
    고국원 민덕기 박강박 조혜경 한정혜 정보과학회지.26(4),55-64 [2008]
  • 과학영재학생의 학습동기와 과제집착력과의 관계
    박미진 이용섭 영재교육연구,21(4),961-977 [2011]
  • 과학 영재의 행동 특성 분석
    이항로 한국지구과학회지, 32(3),294-305 [2011]
  • 공학적 설계와 과학 탐구 과정기반의 STEM 교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용
    권혁수 박경숙 서보현 이효녕 교원교육, 29(3),301-326 [2013]
  • 공업계열 전문계 고등학교 전기․ 전자․ 통신 분야의 활동 중심 STEM교육프로그램 개발.미간행 박사학위논문,한국교원대학교
    배선아 충북 [2009]
  • 공교육의 로봇 교육 내실화를 위한 교사 인식 조사
    김성애 지순덕 로봇학회 논문지,6(4),365~372 [2011]
  • Yakman, G.(2008, March). STΣ@M Education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. In Pupils' Attitudes Towards Technology(PATT-19)Conference:ResearchonTechnology,Innovation, Design&EngineeringTeaching,SaltLakeCity,Utah,USA
  • Yager,R.E.,&Tamir,P.(1993).STSapproach:Reasons,intentions, accomplishments,andoutcomes.ScienceEducation,77(6),637-658.
  • Wright,A.,Ferrer,G.&Wright,A.(2003).ALiberalArtsApproachto Teaching Robotics, Proceedings of 2003 American Society for EngineeringAnnualConference&Exposition,Nashville,Tennessee.
  • Ward,V.(1961).TheFunctionTheoryinProgramsfortheGifted.The TeachersCollegeRecord,62(7),532-532.
  • Verner, I. M. & Ahlgren, D. J.(2004). Conceptualising educational approaches in introductory robotics, International Journal of ElectronicalEngineerngEducation,41(3),183-201.
  • Venville, G., Rennie, L., & Wallace, J.(2004). Decision making and sources of knowledge: how students tackle integrated tasks in science, technology and mathematics. Research in Science Education,34(2),115-135.
  • VanTassel-Baska,J.,&Stambaugh,T.(2009).Affectivecurriculumand instruction for gifted learners.Social-emotional curriculum with giftedandtalentedstudents,113-132.
  • VanTassel-Baska, J., Landau, M., & Olszewski, P. (1985). Toward developing an appropriate math/science curriculum for gifted learners.JournalfortheEducationoftheGifted,8(4),257-272.
  • Tyler, R. W.(1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. UniversityofChicagoPress.IIIinois,USA.
  • Treffinger, D. J.(1986). Research on creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly,30(1),15-19.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2009). The parallel curriculum model: A design to develop potential and challenge high-ability learners. JS Renzulli, EJ Gubbins, KS McMillen, RD Eckert, & C. A, Little (Eds.),Systemsandmodelsfordevelopingprogramsforthegifted andtalented,571-598.
  • Terman, L.M. & Oden, M.H.(1947). Genetic studiesof genius:Vol 4. Thegiftedchildgrowsup.CA:StanfordUniversityPress.
  • Taylor, C.W. (1978). How manytypesof giftednesscan your program tolerate?.TheJournalofCreativeBehavior,12(1),39-51.
  • Tannenbaum, A.(1986). The enrichment model. In J.S.Renzulli(Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented(pp. 126-152). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Subotnik,R.F.,Edmiston,A.M.,&Rayhack,K.M.(2007).Developing national policies in STEM talent development: Obstacles and opportunities. NATO Security Through Science Series E Human and SocietalDynamics,16,28.
  • Sriraman, B., & S ndergaard, B. D.(2009). On bringing interdisciplinary ideas to gifted education. In International handbookongiftedness(pp.1235-1256).SpringerNetherlands.
  • Sodersten,S.&Wilkins,L.(2005).RoboticsProgramsStimulateHawaii Country Girls? Interest in Engineering, Proceedings of WEPAN/NAMEPA,2005JointConference.
  • Seels, B., & Richey, R.(1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Association for Educational CommunicationsandTechnology.
  • Schlichter, C. L.(2009). Talents Unlimited: Thinking skills instruction for all students. Systems and models for developing programsforthegiftedandtalented,433-457.
  • Sanders,M.,Kwon,H.S.,Park,K.S.,&Lee,H.(2011).Integrative STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education:contemporarytrendsandissues.Thesecondaryeducation research,59(3),729-762.
  • Sanders,M.(2006).ARationaleforNewApproachestoSTEMEducationand STEMEducationGraduatePrograms.93rdMississippivalleytechnology teachereducationconference,Nashville,TN.(Nov.3,2006).1-17.
  • Sanders, M.(2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEM mania.The Technology Teacher,68(4),20-26.
  • STS교육의 이해와 적용
    최경희 서울:교학사 [1996]
  • STEM통합교육을 위한 교실친화적 로봇교육 모형 및 프로그램 개발에 관한 연구.미간행 박사학위논문,한국교원대학교
    송정범 충북 [2010]
  • STEM 통합 접근의 사전 공학 교육 프로그램 모형 개발
    문대영 공학교육 연구,11(2),90-101 [2008]
  • STEM 기반 발명영재교육 프로그램 개발과 적용 효과
  • STEM 교육을 위한 기술 수업 설계 모형
    노태천 이소이 한국기술교육학회지,11(3),1-20 [2011]
  • Roy, R.(1989). Natural allies - STS and technology education. THE TECHNOLOGYTEACHER,48(4),13-17.
  • Rosenblatt, M. & Choset, H. (2000). Designing and implementing Hands-On Robotics Labs, IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEM 2000(NOV/DEC), 32-39.
  • Ronald, R., Diane, S. B., John, C., Levelle, B. A., Linda, S. H. & Howard, K. (2010). Advancing the "E" in K-12 STEM Education.The JournalofTechnologyStudies,53-64.
  • Roe, A.(1952). A Psychologist Examines 64 Eminent Scientists. ScientificAmerican,187,21-25.
  • Rockland, R., Bloom, D. S., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., Hirsch,L.S.,&Kimmel,H.(2010).Advancingthe“E”inK-12STEM education.theJournalofTechnologystudies,36(1),53-64.
  • Renzulli,J.S.(2012).ReexaminingtheRoleofGiftedEducationand Talent Development for the 21st Century A Four-Part Theoretical Approach.GiftedChildQuarterly,56(3),150-159.
  • Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2000). The schoolwide enrichment model.Internationalhandbookofgiftednessandtalent,2,367-382.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1977). THE ENRICHMENT TRIAD MODEL: A PLAN FOR DEVELOPINGDEFENSIBLEPROGRAMSFORTHEGIFTEDANDTALENTED.Gifted ChildQuarterly,21(2),227-233.
  • Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Research related to the schoolwideenrichmenttriadmodel.GiftedEducationInternational, 18(1),15-39.
  • Portsmore,M.,Cyr,M.,&Rogers,C.(2001).IntegratingtheInternet, LabVIEW, and Lego Bricks into Modular Data Acquisition and Analysis Software for K-College, Computers in Education Journal, 11(2),10-24.
  • Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Oliver, S., & Johnson, D.(2006). A systems model of innovation processes in university STEM education.JournalofEngineeringEducation,95(1),13-24.
  • Passow, A. H.(1981). The Nature of Giftedness and Talent. Gifted ChildQuarterly,25(1),5-10.
  • Parker, W. D.(1996). Psychological adjustment in mathematically giftedstudents.GiftedChildQuarterly,40(3),154-157.
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P. M., Kulieke, M. J., & Krasney, N. (1988). Personality dimensions of gifted adolescents: A review of the empiricalliterature.GiftedChildQuarterly,32(4),347-352.
  • Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Besterfield‐Sacre, M., Shuman, L. J., & Larpkiattaworn,S.(2007).Amethodforidentifyingvariablesforpredicting STEMenrollment.JournalofEngineeringEducation,96(1),33-44.
  • Nicholls, A., & Nicholls, S. H.(1978). Developing a curriculum: a practicalguide.London:AllenandUnwin.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.(1989). Commission on StandardsforSchoolMathematics.Curriculumandevaluationstandards forschoolmathematics.NationalCouncilofTeachersofMathematics.
  • National Academy of Engineering.(2005). Educating the engineer of 2020.Washington,DC:NationalAcademiesPress.
  • Naglieri,J.A.,&Kaufman,J.C.(2001).Understandingintelligence, giftedness and creativity using the PASS theory. Roeper review, 23(3),151-156.
  • Nagchaudhuri,A.,Singh,G.,Kaur,M.&George,S.(2002).LEGOROBOTICS PRODUVTS BOOST STUDENT CREATIVITY IN PRECOLLEGE PROGRAMS AT UMES, Proceedingsof32ndASEE/IEEEFrontiersinEducationConference,Boston,MA.
  • Nagchaudhuri, A. & Singh, G.(2003). Middle School Students get IntroducedtoFundamentalsofEngineeringattheUMES-NOAASummer Camp, Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, 2003AnnualConference&Exposition.
  • Mukherjee,A.,Pawar,U.S.&Abhishek,V.(2002).DesignandScience through Robotics - Novel Aspects of Constructivistic Learning in Developing Nations, 2nd International Conference on Open Collaborative Design for Sustainable Innovation Creativity, Control&CultureforSustainableChange,Bangalore,India.
  • Morelock, M. J., & Morrison, K.(1999). Differentiating ‘developmentally appropriate’: The multidimensional curriculum modelforyounggiftedchildren.RoeperReview,21(3),195-200.
  • Moon,S.M.,Kolloff,P.,Robinson,A.,Dixon,F.,&Feldhusen,J.F. (2009). The Purdue three-stage model. Systems and models for developingprogramsforthegiftedandtalented,289-322.
  • May). 인터뷰 by 김성애[메모 기록].미국의 로봇교육 실태
    Chung, C.J. Southfeild:MI [2011]
  • Maxim,G.W.(1995).Socialstudiesandtheelementaryschoolchild(5th ed.).EnglewoodCliffs,N.J.:MerrillPublishingCompany.
  • Mataric,M.J.(2004).RoboticsEducationforAllAges,Proceedingsof American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Sumposium onAceessible,Hands-onAIandRoboticsEducation,PaloAlto,CA.
  • Martin, F. G., Butler, D. & Gleason, W. M.(2000). Design, Story-Tellin,and RobotsinIrishPrimaryEducation.Proceedingsof IEEESystems,Man,andCyberneticsconference,Nashville,Tennessee.
  • Marland,S.P.,Jr.(1972).Educationofthegiftedandtalented,Volume I:ReporttotheCongressoftheUnitedStatesbytheCommissionerof Education.Washington,DC:UnitedStatesGovernmentPrintingOffice.
  • Maley,D.(1973).TheMarylandPlan.SchoolShop,32(8),52-54.
  • Malee,J.(2001).Somethoughtsonroboticsforeducation,Proceedings of 2001 American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring SumposiumonRoboticsandEducation,StanfordUniversity.
  • Malec, J.(2001, March). Some thoughts on robotics for education.In 2001AAAISpringSymposiumonRoboticsandEducation.
  • Mahoney, M. P.(2009). STUDENT ATTITUDE TOWARD STEM: DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT FOR HIGH SCHOOL STEM-BASED PROGRAM(M.A). The Ohio State University:OH.
  • Mager, R. F., & Beach Jr, K. M.(1967). Developing Vocational Instruction.Belmont,California:FearonPublishers.
  • Lux, D. G.(1984). Science and T echnology : A New Alliance. The JournalofEpsilonPiTau,10(1),16-21.
  • Lau,K.W.,Tan,H.K.,Erwin. B. T.&Petrovic,P.(1999).Creative learning in school with LEGO Programmable Robotics Products, Proceedings of 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, SanJuan,PuertoRico.
  • Kovalik,S.,&Olsen,K.(1994).ITI:Themodel.Integratedthematic instruction.Kent,WA: BooksforEducators
  • Kaplan, S.(2009). Myth 9: There is a single curriculum for the gifted.GiftedChildQuarterly,53(4),257.
  • July11).융합을 기반으로 하는 STEAM교육이란?
    최정훈 아시아경제신문,fromhttp://www.asiae.co.kr/news/view.htm?idxno=2011071123282298704 [2011]
  • Johnson, S. M.(1996). Leading to Change: The Challenge of the New Superintendency. Jossey-Bass Education Series., San Francisco, CA :Jossey-BassInc.
  • Johnson, D. W.(1981). Student-student interaction: The neglected variableineducation.Educationalresearcher,5-10.
  • Jadud, M. C., Chenoweth, B. N. & Schleter, J. (2003). Little Languages for Little Robots, Proceedings of 16th Psychology of ProgrammingWorkshop,KeeleUniversity,UK.
  • Jacobs, H. H.(1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design, development,andimplementation.Alexandria,VA:ASCD.
  • Jacek, M.(2001). Some thoughts on robotics for education. In Proceeding of American Association of Artificial Intelligence SymposiumonRoboticsandEducation.
  • Ingram, J. B.(1979). Curriculum integration and lifelong education. NY:PergamonPressInc.
  • Hollingworth, L.(1942). Children above 180 IQ.The Teachers College Record,44(1),56-56.
  • Hirst, A., Johnson, J. , Petre, M., Price, B. A. & Richards, M.(2002). What is the Best Environment-Language for Teaching Robotics Using Lego MindStrorm?, Proceedings of The Seventh InternationalSymposiumonArtificialLifeandRobotics(AROB-7), Beppu,Oita,Japan,Sugisaka,M.Tanaka,H.(eds.)
  • Heller, K. A.(1991). The nature and development of giftedness: A longitudinalstudy.EuropeanJournalforHighAbility,2(2),174-188.
  • Gibson, K. S.(2012). Student Teachers of Technology and Design: Can ShortPeriods ofSTEM-Related IndustrialPlacement ChangeStudent Perceptionsof EngineeringandTechnology?.Design and Technology Education,17(1),18-29.
  • Gentry, M., & Ferriss, S.(1999). StATS: A model of collaboration to developsciencetalentamongruralstudents.RoeperReview,21(4), 316-320.
  • Gardner,H.(1995).Reflectionsonmultipleintelligences:Mythsand messages.PhiDeltaKappan,77(3),200.
  • Gardner,H.(1988).12Creativelivesandcreativeworks:asynthetic scientific approach. The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychologicalperspectives,298.
  • Gallagher, J.J.(1958). Peer acceptance of highly gifted children in elemenataryschool.ElementarySchoolJournal,58,465-470.
  • Gagn , F.(2004). Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmentaltheory1.Highabilitystudies,15(2),119-147.
  • Gagn , F.(2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent developmentthroughDMGT-basedanalysis.Internationalhandbookof giftednessandtalent,2,67-79.
  • Fredericks, A. D., Meinbach, A. M., & Rothlein, L.(1993). Thematic units: An integrated approach to teaching science and social studies.HarperCollinsCollegePublishers.
  • Frazee,B,M.,&Rudnitski,R.A.(1995).Integratedteachingmethods: Theory, classroom applications, and field-based connections. Albany,NY:DelmarPublishers.
  • Foster,P.(1994).MustweMST?.JournalofTechnologyEducation,6(1). 76-84.
  • Fogarty, R. (1991). Ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educationalleadership, 49(2), 61-65.
  • Flood, J., & Lapp, D.(1994). Issues and Trends: Teacher Book Clubs: Establishing Literature Discussion Groups for Teachers. The ReadingTeacher,574-576.
  • Feldhusen,J.F.,Ames,R.E.,&Linden,K.W.(1973).Athree‐stage modelforcousedesign.NSPINewsletter,12(3),1-6.
  • Drake, S.(1993). Planing integrated curriculum. Alexandria, Va.: AssociaationofSupercivisionandCurriculumDevelopment.
  • Dick,W.(1996).TheDickandCareymodel:Willitsurvivethedecade?. EducationalTechnologyResearchandDevelopment,44(3),55-63.
  • Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D.(2011). Education of the giftedandtalented(6thed).Boston,MA:PEARSON.
  • Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K.(2014). Diversifying experiences in thedevelopmentofgeniusandtheirimpactoncreativecognition. TheWileyhandbookofgenius,375-393.
  • Cox,C.M.,&Terman, L.M.(1926).Genetic studiesofgenius. Vol. 2, The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford UniversityPress.
  • Congress,U.S.(1978).Educationalamendmentof1978.Publiclaw,95-561.
  • Clark, A. C., & Ernst, J. V.(2006). A Model for the Integration of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Instead of Producing Skilled Craftsmen or Hobbyists, We Are Now to Produce Competent Members of Society with an Array of Knowledge and UnderstandingofNotOnlyTechnologybutAlsoHowItFunctionswith andAffectsOtherContentAreas.TheTechnologyTeacher,66(4),24.
  • Childress, V. W. (1996). Does Integrating Technology, Science, and Mathematics Improve Technological Problem Solving? A Quasi-Experiment.JournalofTechnologyEducation,8(1),16-26.
  • Business Higher Education Forum.(2005). A Commitment to America's Future: Responding to the Crisis in Mathematics and Science Education-TheMainReport.Washington,DC:Author.
  • Burke,L.M.,&McNeill,J.B.(2011)."EducatetoInnovate":Howthe ObamaPlanforSTEMEducationFallsShort.Backgrounder.No.2504. HeritageFoundation.
  • Brown, E., Avery, L., Van Tassel‐Baska, J., Worley, B. B., & Stambaugh, T.(2006). A five‐state analysis of gifted education policies.RoeperReview,29(1),11-23.
  • Bloom, B.(1985). Developing Talent in Young People. New York: BallentineBooks.
  • Bers, M. & Urrea, C.(1999). Con-science: Parents and Children ExploringRoboticsandValues.ProceedingsofEUROLOGO99,Sofia, Bulgaria,356-366.
  • Berry, R. Q., Reed, P. A., Ritz, J. M., Lin, C. Y., Hsiung, S., & Frazier, W.(2004). STEM initiatives: Stimulating students to improve science and mathematics achievement. The Technology Teacher,64(4),23.
  • Annetta, L. A., Frazier, W. M., Folta, E., Holmes, S., Lamb, R., & Cheng,M.T.(2013).Scienceteacherefficacyandextrinsicfactors toward professional development using video games in a design-basedresearchmodel:ThenextgenerationofSTEMlearning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(1), 47-61.Bloom, B.(1985).DevelopingTalentinYoungPeople.NewYork:Ballentine Books.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS).(1993). Project 2061. Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: OxfordUniversityPress.