박사

CAD/CAM 을 이용한 맞춤형 골 이식재와 기성 분말골의 골 형성 유효성 비교 평가

윤지영 2015년
논문상세정보
    • 저자 윤지영
    • 기타서명 Comparative evaluation of osteogenic potentials between CAD/CAM customized bone graft material and prefabricated particulate bone graft material
    • 형태사항 xiv, 43 p.: 26cm
    • 일반주기 지도교수:오남식, 인하대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다, 참고문헌 : p.22-24
    • 학위논문사항 학위논문(박사)-, 인하대학교 대학원 일반대학원, 의학과, 2015. 8
    • DDC WE200, 21
    • 발행지 인천
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2015
    • 발행사항 인하대학교 대학원
    • 주제어 CAD/CAM porous hydroxyapatite ceramic 골 이식 맞춤형 골 이식재
    유사주제 논문( 121)
' CAD/CAM 을 이용한 맞춤형 골 이식재와 기성 분말골의 골 형성 유효성 비교 평가' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • cad/cam
  • porous hydroxyapatite ceramic
  • 골 이식
  • 맞춤형 골 이식재
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
125 0

0.0%

' CAD/CAM 을 이용한 맞춤형 골 이식재와 기성 분말골의 골 형성 유효성 비교 평가' 의 참고문헌

  • de Bruijn, J.D., C.A. van Blitterswijk, and J.E. Davies, Initial bone matrixformation at the hydroxyapatite interface in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res,1995. 29(1): p. 89-99.
  • Yoshikawa, H., et al., Interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramicsfor bone tissue engineering. J R Soc Interface, 2009. 6 Suppl 3: p. S341-8.
  • Wang, H., et al., Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic nano24hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite scaffolds for bone tissueengineering. Biomaterials, 2007. 28(22): p. 3338-48.
  • Wang, G., et al., CAD/CAM and rapid prototyped titanium forreconstruction of ramus defect and condylar fracture caused bymandibular reduction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2012.113(3): p. 356-61.
  • Urist, M.R., Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science, 1965. 150(3698):p. 893-9.
  • Uchida, A., et al., The use of calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic in bonetumour surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1990. 72(2): p. 298-302.
  • Tampieri, A., et al., Porosity-graded hydroxyapatite ceramics to replacenatural bone. Biomaterials, 2001. 22(11): p. 1365-70.
  • Takezawa, T., A strategy for the development of tissue engineeringscaffolds that regulate cell behavior. Biomaterials, 2003. 24(13): p.2267-75.
  • Sun, W. and P. Lal, Recent development on computer aided tissueengineering--a review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 2002. 67(2):p. 85-103.
  • Smith, J.D. and M. Abramson, Membranous vs endochondrial boneautografts. Arch Otolaryngol, 1974. 99(3): p. 203-5.
  • Singare, S., et al., Customized design and manufacturing of chin implantbased on rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2005. 11(2): p.113-118.
  • Sartoris, D.J., et al., Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes:preliminary report of radiographic evaluation. Radiology, 1986. 159(1):p. 133-7.
  • Sachlos, E. and J.T. Czernuszka, Making tissue engineering scaffoldswork. Review: the application of solid freeform fabrication technology tothe production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Cell Mater, 2003. 5:p. 29-39; discussion 39-40.
  • Quadrani, P., et al., High-resolution 3D scaffold model for engineeredtissue fabrication using a rapid prototyping technique. Med Biol EngComput, 2005. 43(2): p. 196-9.
  • Okumura, M., et al., Osteoblastic phenotype expression on the surfaceof hydroxyapatite ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res, 1997. 37(1): p. 122-9.
  • Miyazaki, T., et al., A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status andfuture perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J, 2009.28(1): p. 44-56.
  • Matsumine, A., et al., Calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic implants in bonetumour surgery. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2004.86(5): p. 719-25.
  • Kostopoulos, L., T. Karring, and R. Uraguchi, Formation of jawbonetuberosities by guided tissue regeneration. An experimental study in therat. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1994. 5(4): p. 245-53.
  • Kostopoulos, L. and T. Karring, Role of periosteum in the formation of23jaw bone. An experiment in the rat. J Clin Periodontol, 1995. 22(3): p.247-54.
  • Kostopoulos, L. and T. Karring, Guided bone regeneration in mandibulardefects in rats using a bioresorbable polymer. Clin Oral Implants Res,1994. 5(2): p. 66-74.
  • Kostopoulos, L. and T. Karring, Augmentation of the rat mandible usingguided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1994. 5(2): p. 75-82.
  • Hutmacher, D.W., Scaffold design and fabrication technologies forengineering tissues--state of the art and future perspectives. J BiomaterSci Polym Ed, 2001. 12(1): p. 107-24.
  • Huang, H., et al., Enhanced osteoblast functions on RGD immobilizedsurface. J Oral Implantol, 2003. 29(2): p. 73-9.
  • Hou, J.S., et al., Application of CAD/CAM-assisted technique withsurgical treatment in reconstruction of the mandible. J CraniomaxillofacSurg, 2012. 40(8): p. e432-7.
  • Holmes, R.E., R.W. Bucholz, and V. Mooney, Porous hydroxyapatite asa bone graft substitute in diaphyseal defects: a histometric study. JOrthop Res, 1987. 5(1): p. 114-21.
  • Holmes, R.E. and S.M. Roser, Porous hydroxyapatite as a bone graftsubstitute in alveolar ridge augmentation: a histometric study. Int J OralMaxillofac Surg, 1987. 16(6): p. 718-28.
  • Holmes, R.E. and H.K. Hagler, Porous hydroxylapatite as a bone graftsubstitute in mandibular contour augmentation: a histometric study. JOral Maxillofac Surg, 1987. 45(5): p. 421-9.
  • Gelbard, S., et al., Effect of impression materials and techniques on themarginal fit of metal castings. J Prosthet Dent, 1994. 71(1): p. 1-6.
  • Fujibayashi, S., et al., Repair of segmental long bone defect in rabbitfemur using bioactive titanium cylindrical mesh cage. Biomaterials, 2003.24(20): p. 3445-51.
  • Flautre, B., et al., Porous HA ceramic for bone replacement: role of thepores and interconnections - experimental study in the rabbit. J MaterSci Mater Med, 2001. 12(8): p. 679-82.
  • Donos, N., L. Kostopoulos, and T. Karring, Alveolar ridge augmentationusing a resorbable copolymer membrane and autogenous bone grafts.An experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002. 13(2): p.203-13.
  • Dahlin, C., P. Alberius, and A. Linde, Osteopromotion for cranioplasty.An experimental study in rats using a membrane technique. J Neurosurg,1991. 74(3): p. 487-91.
  • Cordaro, L., et al., Effect of bovine bone and collagen membranes onhealing of mandibular bone blocks: a prospective randomized controlledstudy. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011. 22(10): p. 1145-50.
  • Cohen, A., et al., Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. Oral Surg Oral Med OralPathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009. 108(5): p. 661-6.
  • Ciocca, L., et al., A CAD/CAM-prototyped anatomical condylarprosthesis connected to a custom-made bone plate to support a fibulafree flap. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2012. 50(7): p. 743-9.
  • Bucholz, R.W., A. Carlton, and R.E. Holmes, Hydroxyapatite andtricalcium phosphate bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin North Am, 1987.18(2): p. 323-34.
  • Blackman, R., R. Baez, and N. Barghi, Marginal accuracy and geometryof cast titanium copings. J Prosthet Dent, 1992. 67(4): p. 435-40.
  • Bhumiratana, S. and G. Vunjak-Novakovic, Concise review: personalizedhuman bone grafts for reconstructing head and face. Stem Cells TranslMed, 2012. 1(1): p. 64-9.