연구동향 분석
박사

유럽공통매매법(CESL)하에서 계약책임에 관한 비교 연구 = A Comparative Study on Contractual Liabilities Under Common European Sales Law

심갑영 2015년

논문상세정보
    • 저자 심갑영
    • 형태사항 ⅵ,235: 26 cm
    • 일반주기 지도교수: 심종석
    • 학위논문사항 2015. 8, 무역학과 무역상무전공, 대구대학교, 학위논문(박사)-
    • KDC 326
    • 발행지 경산
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2015
    • 발행사항 대구대학교
    • 주제어 CESL
    유사주제 논문( 15)
인용/피인용
' 유럽공통매매법(CESL)하에서 계약책임에 관한 비교 연구 = A Comparative Study on Contractual Liabilities Under Common European Sales Law' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • cesl
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
16 0

0.0%

' 유럽공통매매법(CESL)하에서 계약책임에 관한 비교 연구 = A Comparative Study on Contractual Liabilities Under Common European Sales Law' 의 참고문헌

  • 「www.ois.go.kr」
  • 「www.epln.law.ed.ac.uk/2015/01/07/proposal-for-a-commerce-european-sales-law-withdrawn」
  • 「www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/countries」
  • 「www.allenovery.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/CESL.pdf」.
  • 「eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN /TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX :32006L0123&from=EN 」
  • 「eur-lex.europa.eu/hompage.html」
  • 「en.euabc.com/word/2077」
  • 「ec.europa.eu/legislation/index_en.htm」
  • 「ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/contract/opinion/150609_en.htm」
  • 「ec.europa.eu/justice/contract」
  • 「ec.europa.eu/justice/contract/cesl/background/index_en.htm」
  • and the Future of the CommonEuropean Sales Law. European Business Law Review, 24(4). 459-465.
  • Zoll, F. (2012). The binding power of the contract: Protection of performance inthe system of the Common European Sales Law. Journal of InternationalTrade Law and Policy, 11(3), 259-265.
  • Wymenga, P. et al. (2012). EU SMEs in 2012: At the crossroads. Annual reporton small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU, 2011/12. Report for theEuropean Commission.
  • Whittaker, S. (2012). The proposed ‘Common European Sales Law’: Legalframework and the agreement of the parties. The Modern Law Review,75(4), 578-605.
  • Wagner, G. (2012). Termination and Cure Under the Common European SalesLaw: Avoiding Pitfalls in Contract Remedies. Available at SSRN 2083049.
  • Velencoso, L. M. M., & O’Flynn, A. (2015). The Rules on Prescription. InEuropean Perspectives on the Common European Sales Law. SpringerInternational Publishing, 287-303.
  • Twigg-Flesner, C. (2012). Dealing with informational asymmetries under theproposed CESL and CISG. Journal of International Trade Law andPolicy, 11(3), 281-299.
  • Shkira, E. (2012). Comparative Study on CISG and CESL Obligations andRemedies of Seller and Buyer in Business to Business Transactions. Available at SSRN 2257241.
  • Sanchez, S. A. (2013). Common European Sales Law and Private InternationalLaw: Some Critical Remarks. Journal of private international law, 9(2). 191-217.
  • Samoy, I., VU, T. D., & JANSENAA, S. (2011). ‘Don’t Find Fault, Find aRemedy’A. European Review of Private Law, 855, 872.
  • Rodriguez, A. S. (2015). Restitution. In European Perspectives on the CommonEuropean Sales Law. Springer International Publishing. 263-286
  • Rainald, M. K. (2012). The Proposed Regulation on a Common European SalesLaw(CESL) as an Alternative to the Convention on the International Saleof Goods(CISG) in Transnational Business-to-Business Transactions?. LundUniversity, 2012.
  • Piltz, B. (2012). The Proposal for a Regulation on a Common European SalesLaw and more particular its Provisions on Remedies. InternationalesHandelsrecht, 12(4), 133-136.
  • Piers, M. (2012). Pre-contractual information duties and remedies in the CESL. Zeitschrift fur Europaisches Privatrecht, 4, 867-897.
  • Nicole K. (2012). The CESL and the CISG, complicating or simplifying the legalenvironment?, Maasstricht University Maastricht European private Law. 10, 16-18, 20.
  • Micklitz, H. W. (2012). The Commission Proposal for a Regulation on a CommonEuropean Sales Law(CESL); Too broad or not Broad enough?. FlorenceDeaperment of Law, 3.
  • Magnus, U. (2014). Damages Rules in the Common European Sales Law and inthe Principles of European Tort Law. Int'l Trade & Bus. L. Rev., 17,224.
  • Magnus, U. (2012). Interpretation and gap-filling in the CISG and in the CESL. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 11(3), 266-280.
  • Magnus, U. (2012). CISG and CESL. Liber Amicorum Ole Lando, 225-255.
  • Loos, M. (2012). Standard contract terms regulation in the proposal for a commonEuropean sales law. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper, (2012-65),776-796.
  • Lando, O. (2011). Comments and questions relating to the European Commission’sproposal for a regulation on a Common European Sales Law. EuropeanReview of Private Law, 19(6), 717-728.
  • Kuipers, J. J. (2008). New Provisions on Private International Law in the Treatyof Lisbon, Maastricht J. Eur. & Comp. L., 15, 109.
  • Kruisinga, S. A. (2013). Incorporation of standard terms according to the CISGand the CESL: Will these Competing Instruments Enhance Legal Certaintyin Cross-Border Sales Transactions?. European Business Law Review,24(3), 341-362.
  • Kornet, N. (2012). The Common European Sales Law and the CISG-Complicatingor Simplifying the Legal Environment?. Maastricht European Private LawInstitute Working Paper, 4.
  • Koitz, Mag. Rainald. (2012) The Proposed Regulation on a Common SalesLaw(CESL) as an Alternative to the Convention on the International Saleof Goods(CISG) in Transnational Business-to-Business Transactions?, LundUniversity, 1-90.
  • Illescas, O. R. & Viscasillas, P. (2012). The scope of the Common EuropeanSales Law: B2B, goods, digital content and services. Journal ofInternational Trade Law and Policy, 11(3), 241-258.
  • Hondius, E. (2013). Common European Sales Law: If It Does Not Help, It Won'tHarm Either. European Review of Private Law, 21(1). 1-12.
  • Hesselink, M. W. (2012). How to opt into the Common European Sales Law?Brief comments on the Commission’s proposal for a regulation. EuropeanReview of Private Law. 1. 195-212.
  • Gifis, S. H. (1996). Law Dictionary, Barron's Educational Series Inc., 519.
  • European Parliament. (2014). European Parliament legislative resolution of 26February 2014 on the proposal for a regulation of the EuropeanParliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law. Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading.
  • European Council. (1999). Tampere European Council 15 and 16 October 1999;Presidency Conclusions. 6.
  • European Commission. (2015). Annex to the Communication from the Commissionto the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic andSocial Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Commission WorkProgramme, 12.
  • European Commission. (2011). The 'Sounding Board' of key stakeholder experts,Annex III to A European contract law for consumers and businesses:Publication of the results of the feasibility study carried out by the ExpertGroup on European contract law for stake holders' and legalpractitioners' feedback. 13.
  • European Commission. (2011). Proposal for a Regulation of the EuropeanParliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law. 8-17.
  • European Commission. (2010). Expert Group on a Common Frame of Preferencein European Contract Law, Synthesis of the Second Meeting. 3.
  • European Commission. (2010). Commission expert Group on a Common Frame ofReference in European Contract law, Synthesis of the third meeting. 4.
  • European Commission. (2010). A European contract law for consumers andbusiness: Publication of the results of the feasibility study carried out bythe Expert Group on European contract law for stake holders' and legalpractitioners' feedback. 1-8.
  • DiMatteo, L. A. (2013). CISG as Basis of Comprehensive International Sales Law. Vill. L. Rev., 58. 691.
  • DiMatteo, L. A. (2012). Common European Sales Law: A critique of itsrationales, functions, and unanswered questions. Journal of InternationalTrade Law and Policy, 11(3). 222-240.
  • Commission of the European Communities. (2004). Communication from theCommission to the European Parliament and the Council, EuropeanContract Law and the revision of the acquis: the way forward, COM651 final. 2.
  • Commission of the European Communities. (2003). Communication from theCommission to the European Parliament and the Council, a More coherentEuropean Contract Law, an Action Plan. COM 68 final. 2.
  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Communication from theCommission to the Council and the European parliament on EuropeanContract Law, COM 398 final. 1-11. 19.
  • Clive, E. (2015). Proposal for a Common European Sales Law withdrawn. European Private Law News, 1-12.
  • Borchardt, K. D. (2010). The ABC of European Union Law, European Union. 87-97.
  • Blazquez, F. O. (2015). Passing of Risk. In European Perspectives on theCommon European Sales Law. Springer International Publishing, 183-205.