연구동향 분석
박사

우리나라 홀스타인종 검정우의 번식형질에 대한 유전분석

원정일 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 우리나라 홀스타인종 검정우의 번식형질에 대한 유전분석' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 근교계수
  • 근교퇴화
  • 번식형질
  • 유전모수
  • 유효집단 크기
  • 혈통완성도
  • 홀스타인 젖소
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
57 0

0.0%

' 우리나라 홀스타인종 검정우의 번식형질에 대한 유전분석' 의 참고문헌

  • 동물육종을 위한 혈통분석 알고리듬과 프로그래밍
  • Wright, S. 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Amer. Nat. 56:330-338.
  • Won, J. I., Kim, S. D., Cho, K. H., Min, H. L., Koo, Y. M. andYoon, H. B. 2013. Study on effective population size ofHolstein population in Korea. Kor. J. Anim. Sci. and Tech. 55(5):367-371.
  • Wiggans, G. R. and VanRaden, P. M. 1995. Calculation and use ofinbreeding coefficients for genetic evaluation of United StatesDairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 78:1584-1590.
  • Weller, J. I. and Ron, M. 1992. Genetic analysis of fertility traitsin Israeli Holsteins by linear and threshold models. J. DairySci. 75:2541-2548.
  • Weigel, K. A. 2001. Controlling inbreeding in modern breedingprograms. J. Dairy Sci. 84(E. Suppl.):E177-E184.
  • Wall, E., Brotherstone, S., Woolliams, J. A., Banos, G. and Coffey,M. P. 2003. Genetic evaluation of fertility using direct andcorrelated traits. J. Dairy Sci. 86:4093-4102.
  • Wall, E., Brotherstone, S., Kearney, J. F., Woolliams, J. A. andCoffey, M. P. 2005. Impact of nonadditive genetic effects inthe estimation of breeding values for fertility and correlatetraits. J. Dairy Sci. 88:736-385.
  • Thompson, J. R., Everett, R. W. and Hammerschmidt, N. L. 2000. Effects of inbreeding on production and survival inHolsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1856-1864.
  • Sorensen, A. C., Sorensen, M. K. and Berg, P. 2005. Inbreedingin Danish dairy cattle breeds. J. Dairy Sci. 88:1865-1872.
  • Smith, S. P. and Graser, H. U. 1986. Estimating variancecomponents in a class of mixed models by restrictedmaximum likelihood. J. Dasiry Sci. 69:134-147.
  • Smith, L. A., Gassell, B. G. and Pearson, R. E. 1998. The effectsof inbreeding on the lifetime performance of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2729-2737.
  • Shaffer, M. L. 1981. Minimum population sizes for speciesconservation. Bioscience. 31:131-134.
  • Seare, S. R. 1982. Matrix algebra useful for statistics. John Wiley& Sons, New York, NY.
  • Schnyder, U. and Stricker, C. 2002. Genetic evaluation for femalefertility in Switzerland. Interbull Bull. 29:138-141.
  • Schaeffer, L. R. 1983. Notes on linear model: Theory, best linearunbaised prediction and variance component estimation. Uni. of Guelph, Guelph, ont.
  • Sargolzaei, M., Schenkel, F. S., Jansen, G. B. and Schaeffer, L. R. 2007. Estimating effective population size in North AmericanHolstein cattle based on genome-wide linkage disequilibrium. Dairy Cattle Breeding and Genetics Committee Meeting.
  • Quaas, R. L. 1976. Computing the diagonal elements of a largenumerator relationship matrix. Biometrics 32:949-953.
  • Patterson, H. D. and Thomson, R. 1971. Recovery of inter-blackinformation when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika. 58:545.
  • Parland, S. Mc., Kearney, J. F., Rath, M. and Berry, D. P. 2007. Inbreeding trends and pedigree analysis of Irish dairy andbeef cattle populations. J. Anim. Sci. 85:322-331.
  • Park, B. H., Kim, S., Seo, K. S., Choi, J. G., Lee, Y. C., Cho, K. H., Choi, T. J. and Salces, A. 2006. Inbreeding and effectivepopulation size of Holstein in Korea. 8th World Congress onGenetics Applied to Livestock Production.
  • Nomura, T., Honda, T. and Mukai, F. 2001. Inbreeding andeffective population size of Japanese Black cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 79:366-370.
  • Neuenschwander, T., Kadarmideen, H. N., Wegmann, S. and deHaas, Y. 2005. Genetics of parity-dependant productionincrease and its relationship with health, fertility, longevity,and conformation in Swiss Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 88(4):1540-1551.
  • Muir, B. L., Fatehi, J. and Schaeffer, L. R. 2004. Geneticrelationships between persistency and reproductiveperformance in first-lactation Canadian Holsteins. J. DairySci. 87: 3029-3037.
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2013. Objective ofanimal improvement. Notification No. 2013-96 of the Ministryof Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  • Miglior, F., Szkotnicki, B. and Burnside, E. B. 1992. Analysis oflevels of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in Jerseycattle. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1112-1118.
  • Meuwissen, T. H. E. and Luo, Z. 1992. Computing inbreedingcoefficients in large populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 24:305-313.
  • Melka, M. G., Stachowicz, K., Miglior, F. and Schenkel, F. S. 2013. Analysis of genetic diversity in five Canadian dairybreeds using pedigree data. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 130:476-486.
  • Martinez, R. A., Grarcia, D., Gallego, J. L., Onofre, G., Perez, J. and Canon, J. 2008. Genetic variability in Colombian Creolecattle populations estimated by pedigree information. J. Anim. Sci. 86:545-552.
  • Maiwashe, A., Nephawe, K. A., van Westhuizen, R. R., Mostert, B. E. and Theron, H. E. 2006. Rate of inbreeding and effectivepopulation size in four major South African dairy cattlebreeds. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 36(1):50-57.
  • Korean Animal Improvement Association. 2015. Linearclassification and judging. www.aiak.or.kr.
  • Kadarmideen, H. N., Thompson, R. and Simm, G. 2000. Linearand threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertilityand milk production in diry cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 71:411-419.
  • Kadarmidden, H. N., Thmpson, R., Coffey, M. P. and Kossaibati,M. A. 2003. Genetic parameters and evaluation from singleandmultiple-trait analysis of dairy cow fertility and milkproduction. Livest. Prod. Sci. 81:183-195.
  • Jansen, J., Van Der Werf, J. and De Boer, W. 1987. Geneticrelationships between fertility traits for dairy cows indifferent parities. Livest. Prod. 17:337-349.
  • Jansen, J. 1986. Direct and maternal genetic parameters offertility traits in Friesian cattle. Livest. Prod. 15:153-164.
  • Jamrozik, J., Fatehi, J., Kistemaker, G. J. and Schaeffer, L. R. 2005. Estimates of genetic parameters for Canadian Holsteinfemale reproduction traits. J. Dairy Sci. 88:2199-2208.
  • Hudson, G. F. S. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1982. Inbreeding ofartificially bred dairy cattle in the Northeastern UnitedStates. J. Dairy Sci. 67:161-170.
  • Henderson, C. R. 1975. Best linear unbiased estimation andprediction under a selection model. Biometrics. 31:423.
  • Henderson, C. R. 1953. Estimation of variance and covariancecomponents. Biometrics. 9:226-253.
  • Hayes, J. F., Cue, R. I. and Monardes, H. G. 1992. Estimates ofrepeatability of reproductive traits in Canadian Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1701-1706.
  • Harville, D. A. 1977. Maximum likelihood approaches to variancescomponent estimaion and to related problems. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 72:320-340.
  • Hartley, H. O. and Rao, J. N. K. 1967. Maximum likelihoodestimation for the mixed analysis of variance model. Biometrika. 54:93.
  • Hansen, M., Lund, M. S., Pedersen, J. and Christensen, L. G. 2004. Gestation length in Danish Holsteins has weak geneticassociations with stillbirth, calving difficulty, and calf size. Livest. Prod. Sci. 91:23-33.
  • Hammami, H., Croquet, C., Stoll, J., Rekik, B. and Gengler, N. 2007. Genetic diversity and joint-pedigree analysis of twoimporting Holstein populations. J. Dairy Sci. 90:3530-3541.
  • Gutierrez, J. P., Altarriba, J., Diaz, C., Quintanilla, R., Canon, J. and Piedrafita, J. 2003. Pedigree analysis of eight Spanishbeef cattle breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol., 35:43-63.
  • Goddard, M. E., Hayes, B., McPartlan, H. and Chamberlain, A. J. 2006. Can the same genetic markers be used in multiplebreeds? CD-ROM communication no. 22-16 in Proc. 8thWorld Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Belo Horizonte,Brazil.
  • Gengler, N., Misztal, I., Bertrand, J. K. and Culbertson, M. S. 1998. Estimation of the dominance variance for postweaninggain in the U.S. Limousin population. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2515-2520.
  • Franklin, I. R. 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. Pages 135-140 in: M. E. Soule and B. A. Wilcox (eds.),Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.
  • Falconer, D. S. and Mackay, Trudy F. C. 1996. Introduction toquantitative genetics. 4th Ed. Longman Group Ltd., England.
  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. and Rubin, D. F. 1977. Maximumlikelihood from incomplete data with EM algorithm. J. RoyalStat. Soc. Series B. 39:1-38.
  • Dang, C. G., Lee, J. J. and Kim, N. S. 2011. Estimation ofinbreeding coefficients and effective population size inbreeding bulls of Hanwoo (Korean Cattle). Koean J. Anim. Sci. & Tech. 53(4):297-302.
  • Cleveland, M. A., Blackbum, H. D., Enns, R. M. and Garrick, D. J. 2005. Changes in inbreeding of U.S. Herefords during thetwentieth century. J. Anim. Sci. 83:992-1001.
  • Cassell, B. G., Adamec, V. and Pearson, R. E. 2003. Effect ofincomplete pedigrees on estimates of inbreeding andinbreeding depression for days to first service and summitmilk yield in Holsteins and Jerseys. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2967-2976.
  • Casanova, L., Hagger, C. and Kuenzi, N. 1992. Inbreeding inSwiss Braunvieh and its influence on breeding valuespredicted from a repeatability animal model. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1119-1126.
  • Bozzi, R., Franci, O., Forabosco, F., Pugliese, C., Crovetti, A. andFilippini, F. 2006. Genetic variability in three Italian beefcattle breeds derived from pedigree information. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 5:129-137.
  • Averill, T. A., Rekaya, R. and Weigel, K. 2004. Genetic analysis ofmale and female fertility using longitudinal binary data. J. Dairy Sci. 87:3947-3952.