연구동향 분석
박사

기업혁신과 정부의 혁신지원제도에 관한 연구 : 기술혁신지원제도를 중심으로

손강호 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 기업혁신과 정부의 혁신지원제도에 관한 연구 : 기술혁신지원제도를 중심으로' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • absorptive capacity
  • corporate innovation and technology innovation
  • innovation and institutions
  • innovation policy
  • technology innovation program
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
152 0

0.0%

' 기업혁신과 정부의 혁신지원제도에 관한 연구 : 기술혁신지원제도를 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • 혁신체제론의 진화 및 주요 논점
    구영우 민완기 조성복 기술혁신학회지 15(2): 225-241 [2012]
  • 한국정보화진흥원. 착용형 기기 관련 개인정보 보호 법제도 개선방안. NIA Privacy Issues 제12호
    Accessed September 8, 2014. http://www.nia.or.kr/bbs/board_view.asp?boardid=201408061318278468&Order=020302&id=13769 [2014]
  • 한국 벤처부문의 지식이전 효과에 대한 진단 : 지식속성, 흡수능력, 정부 및 시장의 복합적 효과
    손동원 기술혁신연구 18(1): 21-51 [2010]
  • 한국 내 해외자회사 시장지향성이 현지시장 지식획득 및 성과에 미치는 영향: 흡수능력의 역할을 중심으로
    정갑연 ( Gap Yeon Jeong ) 기업경영연구 20(6): 323-352 [2013]
  • 한국 내 해외자회사 시장지향성이 현지시장 지식획득 및 성과에 미치는 영향: 흡수능력의 역할을 중심으로
    정갑연 기업경영연구 20(6): 323-352 [2013]
  • 진화관점에서의 조직혁신 통합모델 구축
    김승호 배성현 심준섭 2014 경영관련학회 통합학술대회 한국창업학회 1-24 [2014]
  • 지역 산업클러스터 시스템, 흡수능력 및 혁신성과: 대구지역 섬유 및 IT 산업클러스터의 비교연구
    김승호 박주홍 신진교 장수덕 경상논총 31(12): 51-84 [2004]
  • 지식 탐색, 흡수능력과 혁신의 속도
    김봉선 김언수 전략경영연구 12(1): 1-24 [2009]
  • 외부 지식 활용이 한국 제조 기업들의 혁신에 어떤 영향을 미치는가?
    문성욱 기술혁신학회지 14(4): 711-735 [2011]
  • 연구개발조직에서의 흡수능력 구축
    박노윤 인사관리연구 31(2): 83-116 [2007]
  • 아시아경제. 구글 글래스, 뉴욕경찰도 ‘한 번 써볼까’
    Accessed February 2, 2014. http://view.asiae.co.kr/news/view.htm?idxno=2014020914560033257 [2014]
  • 시스템 통합 산업에서 조직흡수역량과 다각화 수준이 전략적 제휴체결에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 자원기반관점을 토대로 -
    기노경 조직과 인사관리연구 35(4): 33-60 [2011]
  • 세계법제정보센터. 미국 연방 2007 미국 경쟁력강화법(America COMPETES Act of 2007)
    Accessed March 11, 2015. http://world.moleg.go.kr/World/NorthAmerica/US/law/6085/original?astSeq=563&pageIndex=12 [2010]
  • 보건의료 생태계의 공진화에 관한 연구
    김준호 박찬희 홍진환 보건경제와 정책연구 18(3): 53-77 [2012]
  • 미래창조과학부, 한국산업기술진흥협회. 「창조경제를 위한 기술혁신지원제도」
    진한엠앤비 [2014]
  • 디지털타임스. 다. [사설] IT 강국의 ‘잃어버린 10년’
    Accessed September 22, 2014. http://www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2014092202102351699001 [2014]
  • 디지털타임스. 나. 원조 ICT코리아 좁은 시장 정책부재…창조적 전략 필요
    Accessed September 22, 2014. http://www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2014092202100351746001 [2014]
  • 디지털타임스. 가. 스타트 먼저 끊었지만… 선수 뺏긴 스마트 혁신기술
    Accessed September 22, 2014. http://www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2014092202100151746001 [2014]
  • 대덕연구개발특구내 정부출연연구기관에서 도입한 기술이 수출성과에 미치는 효과분석: 기업의 흡수능력을 중심으로
    성을현 황경연 국제지역연구 18(1): 249-269 [2014]
  • 농업발전과 기술혁신
    정선양 한국정책학회보 5: 233-258 [1996]
  • 기업혁신과 혁신제도의 공진화 혁신
    박영택 손강호 한국창업학회지 9(4): 221-241 [2014]
  • 기술협력, 혁신 및 기업의 흡수능력에 관한 실증연구
    강석민 서민교 산업경제연구 26(2): 945-959 [2013]
  • 기술협력 활동이 중소기업의 기술혁신 성과에미치는 영향: 지식흡수능력(Absorptive Capacity)의 조절효과를 중심으로
    김영조 경영학 연구 34(5): 1365-1390 [2005]
  • 기술혁신지원제도의 효과성 분석: 기술혁신조사 자료를 활용하여
    송위진 신태영 과학기술정책 120: 102-117 [1999]
  • 국제합작 파트너 기업 간 협력적 특성이 국제합작투자기업의 지식습득에 미치는 영향: 흡수능력의 매개효과를 중심으로
    박정민 송윤아 이재은 국제지역연구 17(3): 145-175 [2013]
  • 국가혁신시스템에 관한 이론적 고찰: 생산자-공급자 관계의 측면에서
    鄭善陽 과학기술정책동향 10월호(통권 91호) [1996]
  • 구성타당도 평가에 있어서 요인분석의 활용
    강현철 대한간호학회지 43(5): 587-594 [2013]
  • 교통상부. 영국개황
    Accessed March 11, 2015. http://dlps.nanet.go.kr/DlibViewer.do [2004]
  • 경제투데이. 구글 글래스 착용하고 운전하면 교통법규 위반? Accessed January 18, 2014. http://www.eto.co.kr/news/outview.asp?
    Code=20140118123158817&ts=125537 [2014]
  • 개방형 혁신전략을 통한 중소벤처기업의 신사업개발에 관한 탐색적 연구: 대학기술도입 사례
    권영관 임정선 지식재산연구 8(2): 151-177 [2013]
  • 「혁신시스템 이론의 비교분석과 정책적 시사점」
    성태경 과학기술정책연구원 [2005]
  • 「코에볼루션: 이타적 공진화 - 소셜 네트워크 시대의 트렌드와 미래전략」
    김준호 홍진환 한스컨텐츠 [2011]
  • 「전자문서 및 전자거래 기본법」
    미래창조과학부, 법무부 [1997]
  • 「이노베이션 스토리: 혁신에 성공한 기업들이 펼치는 감동의 경영 파노라마」
    박영택 네모북스 [2005]
  • 「생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률」
    보건복지부 [2004]
  • 「디지털 컨버전스 생태계의 특징과 발전전망」
  • 「기술혁신지원제도의 효과분석과 개선방안」
  • 「기술혁신과 과학기술정책」
    송위진 도서출판 르네상스 [2006]
  • 「기술사업화 이론과 실제」
    김경환 조영희 한국기술거래소 [2009]
  • Zahra, S. and George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 17: 185-203.
  • Zahra, S. A. and Covin, J. G. 1994. The financial implications of fit between competitive strategy and innovation types and sources. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 5: 183-211.
  • Young, M. and Post, J. E. 1993. Managing to communicate, communicating to manage: How leading companies communicate with employees. Organizational Dynamics 22: 31-43.
  • Wicken, O. 2009. Policies for path creation: The rise and fall of Norway’s research-driven strategy for industrialization. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C. and Verspagen, B. (Eds.), Innovation, path dependency and policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Whitley, R. 2002. Developing innovative competences: The role of institutional frameworks. Industrial and Corporate Change 11: 497-528.
  • Wang, L., and Ahmed, K. 2007. Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 9: 31-51.
  • Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Vinding, A. 2006. Absorptive capacity and innovative performance: A human capital approach. Economics of Innovation & New Technology 15(4/5): 507-517.
  • Veugelers, R. 1997. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy 26: 303-315.
  • Van den Bosch, F., Volberda, H., and De Boer, M. 1999. Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science 10: 551-568.
  • Van de Ven, A. H. 1993. Managing the process of organizational innovation. In: Huber, G, P. and Glick, W. H. (Eds.), Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Utterback, J. M. and Abernathy, W. J. 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. OMEGA 3: 639-656.
  • Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer intra-organizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal 44: 996-1004.
  • Todorova, G. and Dursin, B. 2007. Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32: 774-786.
  • Tao, L., Probert, D. and Phaal, R. 2010. Towards an integrated framework for managing the process of innovation. R&D Management 40: 19-30.
  • Tak, J. K. 2007. Psychological testing: An understanding of development and evaluation method. Seoul: Hakjisa Publisher.
  • Stuart, T. and Podolny, J. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter Special Issue): 21-38.
  • Stock, G., Greis, N. and Fischer, W. 2001. Absorptive capacity and new product development. Journal of High Technology Management Research 12: 77-91.
  • Stam, E. and Nooteboom, Bart. 2010. Entrepreneurship, innovation and institutions. Utrecht School of Economics: Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute Discussion Paper Series 11-03.
  • Snook, S. C. and Gorsuch, R. L. 1989. Component analysis versus common factor analysis: A Monte Carlo study. Psychological Bulletin 106: 148-154.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Satell, G. 2013. How to Manage Innovation. Accessed July 5, 2013. http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregsatell/2013/03/07/how-to-manage-innovation-2/.
  • Rogers, E. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
  • Porter, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.
  • Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K. and Marsh, L. 2006. Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal 27: 369-388.
  • Pasinetti, L. 1981. Structural change and economic growth: A theoretical essay on the dynamics of the wealth of nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oltra, M. and Flor, M. 2003. The impact of technological opportunities and innovative capabilities on firm’s output innovation. Creativity & Innovation Management 12: 137-144.
  • OECD. 2005. Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. 1997. Oslo manual: The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. 1995. Recommendation of the council of the oecd on improving the quality of government regulation. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. 1992. Managing national innovation systems. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. 1971. OECD Economic surveys: United Kingdom 1971. Paris: OECD.
  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nielsen, J. and Pawlik, K. 2007. The export intensity of foreign affiliates in transition economies. Economics of Transition 15: 603-624.
  • Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Nelson, R. R. and Rosenberg, N. 1993. Technical Innovation and National Systems. In: R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National systems of innovation- comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mytelka, L. K. and Smith, K. 2002. Policy learning and innovation theory: An interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy 31: 1467-1479.
  • Muscio, A. 2007. The impact of absorptive capacity on smes’ collaboration. Economics of Innovation & New Technology 16: 653-668.
  • Mukherjee, A., Mitchell, W. and Talbot, F. 2000. The impact of new manufacturing requirements on production line productivity and quality at a focused factory. Journal of Operations Management 18: 139-168.
  • Mudambi, P. and Swift, T. 2014. Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D. Strategic Management Journal 35: 126-145.
  • Mowery, D., Oxley, J. and Silverman, B. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter 96 Special): 77-91.
  • Mowery, D. and Oxley, J. 1995. Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1: 67-93.
  • Moore, J. F. 1993. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition, Harvard Business Review 71(May-June): 75-86.
  • Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C. and Park, H. J. 2003. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies 34: 586-599.
  • Meeus, M., Oerlemans, L. and Hage, J. 2001. Patterns of interactive learning in a high-tech region. Organization Studies 22: 145-172.
  • Markins, S. 1995. Fungal and yeast isolated from Greek tannery liquid wastes. Cryptogamie Mycologie 16: 111-119.
  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
  • Mansfield, E. 1968. The economics of technological change. W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Madhavan, R., and Grover, R. 1998. From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing 62: 1-12.
  • Lundvall, B. A. 1992. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
  • Lundvall, B. A. 1985. Production Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
  • Liu, X. and White, R. 1997. The relative contributions of foreign technology and domestic inputs to innovation in chinese manufacturing industries. Technovation 17: 119-125.
  • Link, A. N. and Siegel, D. S. 2007. Innovation, entrepreneurship, and technological change. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Levitt, B. and March, J. G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14: 319-338.
  • Lenox, M. and King, A. 2004. Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management Journal 25: 331-345.
  • Laranja et al. 2008. Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Research Policy 37: 823-835.
  • Lane, P., Koka, B. and Pathak, S. 2006. The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review 31: 833-863.
  • Kimberly, J. R. and Evanisko, M. 1981. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal 24: 689-713.
  • Kiat(한국산업기술진흥원). 핀란드 Tekes의 연구개발 지원전략과 성과평가
    Accessed March 11, 2015. https://www.kiat.or.kr/site/program/board/detail.jsp?menuID=001005004005004&boardTypeID=288&boardID=43591&boardTypeDivision=0&menuID=001005004005004¤tPage=5&searchSelect=&keyWord=&boardCategory=&createdBy=0&startDate=&endDate=&boardLines=0&boardCategorySelect1=&boardCategorySelect2=&boardCategorySelect3=&siteNick=&boardyear=All [2013]
  • Kaiser, H. F. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39: 31-36.
  • KBS(한국방송공사). [취재후] 덴마크엔 왜 강소기업이 많을까? Accessed February 12, 2014. http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/NewsView.do?
    SEARCH_NEWS_ CODE=3017734 [2014]
  • Johnson, B. 1992. Institutional learning. In: Lundvall, B. A. (Ed.), National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
  • Jayaram, J., Oke, A. and Prajogo, D. 2014. The antecedents and consequences of product and process innovation strategy implementation in Australian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research 529: 4424-4439.
  • Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J. and Volberda, H. W. 2005. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal 48: 999-1015.
  • IDC. 2014. Worldwide wearable computing device 2014–2018 forecast and analysis. Accessed March 29, 2014. http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=247318.
  • IBM. 2007. Path to success: Three ways to innovate your business Model. Accessed November 6, 2013. http://www-935.ibm.com/services/uk/bcs/pdf/paths_to_success.pdf.
  • Henderson, R. and Clark, K. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9-30.
  • Guerzoni, M. and Raiteri, E. 2015. Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Research Policy 44: 726-747.
  • GE(General Electronic Company). 2014. GE Global Innovation Barometer 2014. Accessed August 15, 2014. http://files.publicaffairs.geblogs.com.s3.amazonaws.com/ideas-lab/projects/innovation-barometer-2014/index.html.
  • Freeman, C. 1987. Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons form Japan. London: Frances Pinter.
  • Flatten, T., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. and Brettel, M. 2011. A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal 29: 98-116.
  • Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E. and Laranja, M. 2011. Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy 40: 702-713.
  • Fabrizio, K. 2009. Absorptive capacity and search for innovation. Research Policy 38: 255-267.
  • Edler, J. and Georghiou, L. 2007. Public procurement and innovation —Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy 36: 949-963.
  • Dyer, J., H., Gregersen, H. B., and Christensen, C. M. 2011. The innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Dyer, J., H., Gregersen, H. B. and Christensen, C. M. 2009. The innovator's DNA. Harvard Business Review 87: 60-67.
  • Drucker, P. F. 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. London: Routledge.
  • Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120-1171.
  • Dolfsma, W. and Seo, D. 2013. Government policy and technological innovation - A suggested typology. Technovation 33: 173-179.
  • DeCarolis, D. M. and Deeds, D. L. 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 20: 953-968.
  • Datta, A., Jessup, L. and Reed, R. 2011. Corporate reputation and the commercialization of innovation: Does reputation match reality, and does innovation matter? Technology and investment 2: 256-272.
  • Damanpour, R. and Gopalakrishnan, S. 2001. The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies 38: 45-65.
  • Damanpour, F. and Gopalakrishnan, S. 1998. Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: The role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 15: 1-24.
  • Damanpour, F. and Evan, W. M. 1984. Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly 29: 392–409.
  • Daft, R. L. 1978. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal 21: 193-210.
  • DTI. 2003. Competing in the global economy: The innovation challenge. Accessed September 15, 2014. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.dti.gov.uk/files/file12093.pdf.
  • Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152.
  • Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99: 569-596.
  • Cockburn, I. and Henderson, R. 1998. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics 46: 157-182.
  • Christensen, C. M. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fall. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. 2006. Open Business Models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Cartell, L. and Harman, A. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1: 245-276.
  • Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R. 1991. On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1: 93-118.
  • Carlsson, B. 1984. The development and use of machine tools in historical perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5: 91-114.
  • Carlsson, B. (Ed.) 2002. Technological systems in the bio industries: An international study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Boynton, A., Zmud, R. and Jacobs, G. 1994. The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations. MIS Quarterly 18: 299-318.
  • Borr s, S. and Edquist, C. 2013. The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80: 1513-1522.
  • Bonner, J. M. and Walker, O. C. Jr. 2004. Selecting influential business-to-business customers in new product development: Relational embeddedness and knowledge heterogeneity considerations. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21: 155-169.
  • Bettis, R. A. and Hitt, M. A. 1995. The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal 16: 7-19.
  • Berkhout, B., Hartmann, D. and Trott, P. 2010. Connecting technological capabilities with market needs using a cyclic innovation model. R&D Management 40: 474-490.
  • Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B. and Veugelers, R. 2004. Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization 22(8/9): 1237-1263.
  • Baregheh, A., Rowley, J. and Sambrook, S. 2009. Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision 47: 1323-1339.
  • Barbosa, N. and Faria, A. P. 2011. Innovation across Europe: How important are institutional differences? Research Policy 40: 1157-1169.
  • BSC의 커뮤니케이션과 기업성과: 흡수능력, 신뢰 및 학습의 역할
    김진환 회계저널 17(3): 287-321 [2008]
  • B2B 전자시장을 구축하는 기업의 비즈니스 모델 선택과 웹컨텐츠 관리 분석
    손강호 하성호 경북대학교 석사학위논문 [2003]
  • Auito, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D. and Write, M. 2014. Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy 43: 1097-1108.
  • Asheim, B. T. and Mariussen, . (Eds.) 2003. Innovation, Regions and Projects: Studies in new forms of knowledge governance. Stockholm: Nordregio.
  • Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. and Frenz, M. 2013. Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Research Policy 42: 303-314.
  • Allcorn, S. and Diamond, M. A. 1997. Managing people during stressful times: The psychological defensive workplace. Westport, CO: Quorum Books.
  • Ahuja, G. and Katila, R. 2001. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal 22: 197-220.