박사

Mobility Enhancement of PMIPv6 for Heterogeneous Network and Software Defined Networking

논문상세정보
' Mobility Enhancement of PMIPv6 for Heterogeneous Network and Software Defined Networking' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • heterogeneous network
  • pmipv6
  • software defined networking
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
77 0

0.0%

' Mobility Enhancement of PMIPv6 for Heterogeneous Network and Software Defined Networking' 의 참고문헌

  • Y. Hong, J. Youn, T. Tran, and D. Liu, Virtual interface for multiple interfaces ina host , IETF Internet-Draft, draft-hong-mif-virtual-interface-02, October 2010.
  • Y. Hong, J. Youn, H. Kim, and T. Hyun, Analysis of the Usage of a LogicalInterface in PMIPv6 , 13th International Conference on AdvancedCommunication Technology (ICACT2011), February 2011.
  • Y. Han, and S. Hwang, Care-of address provisioning for efficient IPv6 mobilitysupport , Computer Communications, Vol. 29, pp. 1422-1432, September 2005.
  • Virtual Network Interfaces. http://www.linux.it/~rubini/docs/vinter/. Accessed 13August 2013.
  • T. Narten, E. Nordmark, W. Simpson, and H.Soliman, Neighbor Discovery forIP version 6 (IPv6) , IETF RFC 4861, September 2007.
  • T. Melia, and S. Gundavelli, Logical-interface Support for Multi-access enabledIP Hosts , IETF Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-11,March 2015.91
  • T. Aura, Crytographically Generated Addresses (CGA) , IETF RFC 3972,March 2005.
  • S.M. Raza, D. Kim, and H. Choo, Leveraging PMIPv6 with SDN , ICUIMC 14Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous InformationManagement and Communication, Article No. 13, January 2014.
  • S. Thomson, T. Narten, and T. Jinmei, IPv6 Stateless AddressAutoconfiguration , ITEF 4862, September 2007.
  • S. Pack, X. Shen, J. W. Mark, and J. Pan, Adaptive Route Optimization inHierarchical Mobile IPv6 Networks , IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing,vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 903-914, August 2007.
  • S. Pack, J. Choi, T. Kwon, and T. Choi, Fast-Handoff Support in IEEE 802.11Wireless Networks , IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 9, no. 1,pp. 2-12, 2007.
  • S. Lo, G. Lee, W. Chen, and J. Liu, Architecture for mobility and QoS supportin all-IP wireless networks , Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal,Vol. 22(4), pp. 691-705, May 2004.
  • S. Krishnan, H. Yokota, T. Melia, and C. Bernardos, Issues with Network basedInter-technology Handovers , IETF Internet-Draft, draft-krishnan-netextintertech-ps-02, July 2009.
  • S. Kim, H. Choi, Y. Han, and S. Min, An Adaptation of Proxy Mobile IPv6 toOpenFlow Architecture over Software Defined Networking , IEICETRANSACTIONS on Communications, Vol. E98-B, No. 4, April 2015.
  • S. Kim, H. Choi, H. Lee, S. Min, and Y. Han, Multiple Virtual Interfaces forMulti-homing Hosts to Support Inter-technology Handover in PMIPv6Network , Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 73, No. 2, November 2013.
  • S. Gundavelli, K. Leung, V. Devarapalli, K. Chowdhury, and B. Patil, ProxyMobile IPv6 , IETF RFC 5213, August 2008.
  • S. Graf, and G. Alonso, Implementing a virtual network interface for Linux 2.6 ,Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule Swiss Ferderal Institute of TechnologyZurich (ETH), March 2006.
  • R. Ramjee, T. Porta, S. Thuel, K. Varadhan, and S. Wang, HAWAII: A DomainbasedApproach for Supporting Mobility in Wide-area Wireless Networks ,IEEE/ACM Transactions on networking, Vol. 10-3, pp. 396-410, June 2002.
  • P. Dely, A. Kassler, L. Chow, A software-defined networking approach forhandover management with real-time video in WLANs , Journal of ModernTransportation, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 58-65, March 2013.
  • OpenFlow, Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC) News letter, No 52, pp38-41, November 2012.
  • Open Networking Foundation, OpenFlow Switch Specification Version 1.4.0(Wire Protocol 0x04) , October 2013.
  • NS-3 Network Simulator. http://www.nsnam.org. Accessed 30 March 2013.94
  • N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, and L. Peterson, J.Rexford, S. Shenker, and J. Turner, "OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campusnetworks," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 38-2, pp.69-74, April 2008.
  • N. Feamster, J. Rexford, and E. Zegura, The Road to SDN: An IntellectualHistory of Programmable Networks , ACM Magazine Queue - Large-ScaleImplementations, Volume 11, Issue 12, December 2013.
  • Microsoft TechNet. http://technet.microsoft.com/enus/library/cc708404(v=ws.10).aspx.Accessed 13 August 2013.
  • M. Jeyatharan, and C. Ng, Fast Handoff using Dormant Bindings in PMIPv6 ,IETF Internet-Draft, draft-jeyatharan-netext-pmip-dorman-binding-00, October2009.
  • K. Kong, W. Lee, Y. Han, M. Shin, and H. You, Mobility management for all-IPmobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6 , IEEE Wireless92Communications, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 36-45, April 2008.
  • J. Lee, and T. Chung, How much do we gain by introducing Route Optimizationin Proxy Mobile IPv6 networks? , Annals of Telecommunications,http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12243-009-0127-9, August 2009.
  • J. Lee, and T. Chung, Cost Analysis of IP Mobility Management Protocols forConsumer Mobile Devices , IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol.56, no. 2, pp. 1010-1017, May 2010.
  • J. Lee, Y Kim, and D. Lee, Enhanced Handover Process for Proxy Mobile IPv6 ,Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering (MUE), August 2010.
  • J. Lee, T. Chung, and S. Gundavelli, A Comparative Signaling Cost Analysis ofHierarchical Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6 , Personal, Indoor and MobileRadio Communications (PIMRC) 2008. IEEE 19th International Symposium,95September 2008.
  • J. Lee, J. Lee, and T. Chung, An adaptive inter-mobility supports scheme forNetLMM , Second International Conference on Systems and NetworksCommunications 2007, ICSNC.2007, DOI: 10.1109/ICSNC.2007.14.
  • J. Lee, J. Bonnin, I. You, and T. Chung, Comparative Handover PerformanceAnalysis of IPv6 Mobility Management Protocols , IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1077-1088, March 2013.
  • J. Lee, E. Thierry, and T. Chung, Cost Analysis of IP Mobility ManagementProtocols for Consumer Mobile Devices , IEEE Transactions on ConsumerElectronics, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 1010-1017, May 2010.
  • J. Kempf, Goals for Network-Based Localized Mobility Management(NETLMM) , IETF RFC 4831, April 2007
  • J. Arkko, J. Kempf, B. Zill, and P. Nikander, Secure Neighbor Discovery(SEND) , IETF RFC 3971, March 2005.
  • IEEE 802.1AB - 2009, IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks- Station and Media Access Control Connectivity Discovery , September 2009.
  • H. Choi, S. Min, and Y. Han, PMIPv6-based Flow Mobility Simulation in NS-3 , International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services inUbiquitous Computing 2011 (IMIS2011), June 2011.
  • H. Choi, S. Min, Y. Han, and R. Koodli, Design and Simulation of a FlowMobility Scheme Based on Proxy Mobile IPv6 , Journal of InformationProcessing Systems, Volume 8, Number 4, pp. 603-620, 2012.
  • H. Choi, S. Min, Y. Han, J. Park, and H. Kim, Implementation and Evaluation ofProxy Mobile IPv6 in NS-3 Network Simulator , In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on Ubiquitous Information Technology andApplications 2010 (CUTE2010), December 2010.
  • F. Baumann, and I. Niemerggers, An evaluation of location managementprocedures , IEEE international conference on universal personalcommunications (UPC), pp 359-364, 1994.
  • D. Thaler, M. Talwar, and C. Patel, Neighbor Discovery Proxies (ND Proxy) ,IETF RFC 4389, April 2006.
  • D. McPherson, and K. Patel, Experience with the BGP-4 Protocol , IETF RFC4277, January 2006.
  • C. Perkins, D. Johnson, and J. Arkko, Mobility Support in IPv6 , IETF RFC6275, July 2011.
  • Andras G. Valko, Cellular IP: A New Approach to Internet Host Mobility ,ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 29, pp. 50-65,January 1999.
  • A. Lara, A. Kolasani, and B. Ramamurthy, Network Innovation using OpenFlow:93A Survey , IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp493-512, August 2013.
  • A. Campbell, H. De Meer, M. Kounavis, J. Vicente, and D. Villela, A Survey ofProgrammable Networks, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol.29, Issue 2, pp. 7-23, April 1999.