연구동향 분석
박사

의료 방사선량 모니터링을 위한 품질관리 프로그램 개발에 관한 연구 = The study on the development of quality control program for monitoring medical radiation exposure

김정수 2015년

논문상세정보
    • 저자 김정수
    • 형태사항 vi, 111 p. :: 26 cm: 삽화
    • 일반주기 지도교수: 김정민, 단면인쇄임, 참고문헌: p104-110
    • 학위논문사항 2015. 8, 바이오융합공학과, 고려대학교 대학원, 학위논문(박사)-
    • 발행지 서울
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2015
    • 발행사항 고려대학교 대학원
    • 주제어 의료방사선
    유사주제 논문( 6)
인용/피인용
' 의료 방사선량 모니터링을 위한 품질관리 프로그램 개발에 관한 연구 = The study on the development of quality control program for monitoring medical radiation exposure' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 의료방사선
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
7 0

0.0%

' 의료 방사선량 모니터링을 위한 품질관리 프로그램 개발에 관한 연구 = The study on the development of quality control program for monitoring medical radiation exposure' 의 참고문헌

  • Woo Kyoung Jeong. Radiation exposure and its reduction in the fluoroscopicexamination and fluoroscopy-guided interventional radiology. J. Korean MedAssoc 54(12): 1269-1276, December 2011.
  • Vano, E., Padovani, R., Neofotistou, V., Tsapaki, V., Kottou, S., Ten, J. I. &Faulkner, K. (2010, January). Improving patient dose management using DICOMheader information. The European SENTINEL experience. In Proceedings of theInternational Special Topic Conference on Information Technology inBiomedicine.Available at http://medlab. cs. uoi. gr/itab2006/proceedings/Medical%20Imaging/149. pdf, Accessed (Vol. 22).
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary RadiationExposure from Medical Imaging. Center for Devices and Radiological Health2010. Accessed 17th, March, 2015. Available at :http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/RadiationDoseReduction/ucm199994.htm
  • U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Diagnostic X-Ray Systems andTheir Major Components. Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR 1020.33, 1984.
  • Tracy J. Robinson, Jeffrey D. Robinson and Kalpana M. Kanal. Implementationof the ACR Dose Index Registry at a Large Academic Institution: EarlyExperience. Journal of digital imaging 26.2 : 309-315, 2013.
  • Thomas L. Slovis. Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the AsLow As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept, Pediatrics 112(4) October 1,971 ?972, 2003.
  • Thomas B. Shope, Robert M. Gagne and Gordon C. Johnson. A method fordescribing the doses delivered by transmission x?ray computed tomography.Med. Phys. 8, 488, 1981.
  • Tessa S. Cook, Stefan L. Zimmerman, Scott R. Steingall, Andrew D. A.Maidment, Woojin Kim, William W. Boonn, RADIANCE: An Automated,Enterprisewide Solution for Archiving and Reporting CT Radiation DoseEstimates. Radiographics 31.7 : 1833-1846, 2011.110
  • Strauss, Keith J., and Sue C. Kaste. "The ALARA (As Low As ReasonablyAchievable) Concept in Pediatric Interventional and Fluoroscopic Imaging:Striving to Keep Radiation Doses as Low as Possible during Fluoroscopy ofPediatric Patients?A White Paper Executive Summary 1." Radiology 240.3,621-622, 2006.
  • Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D, Suess C, Hildebolt C. Radiation dose andimage quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size andshape. Radiology 233(2), 515?52, 2004.
  • Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M. National survey of dosesfrom CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968?980, 2006.
  • Shrimpton P.C., Wall B.F., Hart D., Diagnostic Medical Exposures in theU.K., Applied Radiation and Isotopes, January 1999.
  • Schauer DA , Linton OW . NCRP report no. 160: ionizing radiation exposure ofthe population of the United States, medical exposure?are we doing less withmore, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys 97 ( 1 ): 1?5,2009.
  • Schandorf, C. and Tetteh, G. K. Analysis of Dose and Dose Distribution forPatients Undergoing Selected X ray Diagnostic Procedures in Ghana. Radiat.Prot. Dosim. 76(4), 249?256, 1998.
  • S E Peters, P C Preman, Digital radiography: are the manufacturers settings105too high? Optimisation of th Kodak digital radiography system with aid of thecomputed radiography dose index , Eur Radiol 12, 2381-2387, 2002.
  • P. Charnock, A. F. Dunn, B. M. Moores, J. Murphy and R. Wilde.,ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMPREHENSIVE SET OF REGIONAL DRLSFOR CT BY MEANS OF ELECTRONIC X-RAY EXAMINATION RECORDS,Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1?12, 2014.
  • National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Diagnostic referencelevel of chest X ray examination, Radiation safety series No17. 2008.
  • Muhogora, W. E., Nyanda, A. M., Lema, U. S. and Ngaile, J. E. TypicalRadiation Doses to Patients from some Common X ray Examinations inTanzania. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 82(4), 301?305, 1999.
  • McCollough CH. Patient dose in cardiac computed tomography. Herz 28:1-6,2003.
  • McCollough CH, Zink FE. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT107system. Med Phys 26:2223?2230, 1999.
  • Martin Uffmann , Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop. Digital radiography: The balancebetween image quality and required radiation dose. European Journal ofRadiology, Volume 72, Issue 2, 202 ? 208, 2009.
  • Mark 0. Guld, Michael Kohnen, Daniel Keysers, Henning Schubert, Berthold B.Wein, Jorg Bredno, and Thomas M. Lehmann. Quality of DICOM headerinformation for image categorization. Medical Imaging 2002: PACS and108Integrated Medical Information Systems Design and Evaluation. SPIE Vol. 4685,280-287. 2002.
  • MILDENBERGER, Peter; EICHELBERG, Marco; MARTIN, Eric. Introduction tothe DICOM standard. European radiology, 12.4: 920-927, 2002.
  • Leitz, W., B. Axelsson, and G. Szendro. "Computed tomography doseassessment-a practical approach." Radiation Protection Dosimetry 57(1-4),377-380, 1995.
  • Lawrence Lau and Kwan-Hoong Ng. Radiological Safety and Quality:Paradigms in Leadership and Innovation Springer Science. 3-34, 2014.
  • Kim J, Seo D, Choi I, Nam S, Yoon Y, Kim H, Her J, Han S, Kwon S, ParkH, Yang D, Kim J. Development of Diagnostic Reference Levels Using aReal-Time Radiation Dose Monitoring System at a Cardiovascular Center inKorea. J Digit Imaging. Feb 21 2015.
  • Kevin O Donnell. Radiation exposure monitoring: a new IHE profile. PediatrRadiol 41:588?591. 2011.
  • Jones DG, Shrimpton PC. Survey of CT Practice in the UK. Part 3:Normalised Organ Doses Calculated Using Monte Carlo techniques. Oxon:National Radiological Protection Board, 1991
  • Jessen K, Panzer W, Shrimpton P. EUR 16262. European guidelines on qualitycriteria for computed tomography. Luxemburg: Office for Official publications ofthe European Communities, 2000.
  • International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical Electrical Equipment.Part 2-44: Particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment forcomputed tomography. IEC publication No. 60601-2-44. Ed. 2.1: InternationalElectrotechnical Commission (IEC) Central Office: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  • International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection:ICRP Publication 103. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 2007.
  • International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological Protection andSafety in Medicine(Report 73). Annals of the ICRP. 1996;26(2):1-31.109
  • International Commission on Radiological Protection. Managing Patient Dose inDigital Radiology: ICRP Publication 93. Ann. ICRP 34 (1).106
  • International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations ofthe International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP Publication 60.New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1991.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency. Optimization of the radiological protectionof patients undergoing radiography, fluoroscopy and computed tomography.IAEA-TECDOC-1423, December 2004.
  • Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. IHE Radiology (RAD) TechnicalFramework, Volume 1 The IHE RAD TF-1 Integration Profiles.Available atwww.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/Radiology/IHE_RAD_TF_Vol1.pdfAccessed 2015. 4. 5.
  • Hart D, Wall B.F., U.K. Population Dose From Medical X-ray Examinations, European Journal of Radiology, June 2004.
  • HJ Kim, JM Kim, IS Choi, YS Yoon, DK Seo, JS Kim, DY Kim, SY Park.Features and tenads of IEC particular standards for medical related todiagnostic X-ray based on IEC 60601-1:2005 Ed 3.0 JRST Vol36(1) 1-9, 2013.
  • H. P. Busch and K. Faulkner. Image quality and dose management in digitalradiography: a new paradigm for optimisation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry(December 2005) 117 (1-3): 143-147, 2015.
  • Engel-Hills P. Radiation protection in medical imaging. Radiography. 12:153?60, 2006.
  • E. Vano. GLOBAL VIEW ON RADIATION PROTECTION IN MEDICINE.Radiat Prot Dosimetry (2011) 147 (1-2): 3-7, 2011.
  • E. Vano, L. Gonzalez. Approaches to Establishing Reference Levels inInterventional Radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry (2001) 94 (1-2): 109-112, 2001.
  • DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 6, Digital Imaging andCommunications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 94: Diagnostic X-RayRadiation Dose Reporting (Dose SR).Available at ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup94_ft.pdf Accessed2015.4.2.
  • D. Papadimitriou, A. Perris, M. G. Molfetas, N. Panagiotakis, A. Manetou, G.Tsourouflis, J. Vassileva, P. Chronopoulos, O. Karapanagiotou and S. Kottou.PATIENT DOSE, IMAGE QUALITY AND RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUESFOR COMMON X RAY EXAMINATIONS IN TWO GREEK HOSPITALSAND COMPARISON WITH EUROPEAN GUIDELINES. Radiat. Prot. Dosim.95(1), 43?48, 2001.
  • Cynthia H. McCollough, Shuai Leng, Lifeng Yu, Dianna D. Cody, John M.Boone and Michael F. McNitt-Gray, CT Dose Index and Patient Dose: TheyAre Not the Same Thing. Radiology 259(2), 311-316, 2011.
  • Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop, Ulrich Neitzel, Henk W. Venema, Martin Uffmann,and Mathias Prokop. Digital chest radiography: an update on moderntechnology, dose containment and control of image quality. Eur Radiol. 2008Sep; 18(9): 1818?1830, 2008.
  • Brody, A. S., Frush, D. P., Huda, W., & Brent, R. L. "Radiation risk tochildren from computed tomography." Pediatrics 120.3, 677-682, 2007.
  • Bongartz G, Golding S, Jurik A, Leonardi M, van Meerten EvP, Geleijns J,Jessen KA, Panzer W, Shrimpton PC, Tosi G. European Guidelines forMultislice Computed Tomography. European Commission 2004.
  • American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Size-Specific Dose Estimates(SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. American Associationof Physicists in Medicine, 2011.
  • Almen, A., Tingberg, A., Mattsson, S., Besjakov, J., Kheddache, S., Lanhede, B.,Mansson, L. G. and Zankl, M. The Influence of Different Technique Factors onImage Quality of Lumbar Spine Radiographs as Evaluated by Established CECImage Criteria. Br. J. Radiol. 73, 1192?1199, 2000.
  • AAPM, T. G. The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dosein CT. AAPM report 96, 2008.