박사

소비자 선호를 반영한 사과의 등급표준화에 관한 연구 = A study on the grading and standardization based on consumer preference : the case of apple

이동현 2015년
논문상세정보
' 소비자 선호를 반영한 사과의 등급표준화에 관한 연구 = A study on the grading and standardization based on consumer preference : the case of apple' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 등급
  • 등급표준화
  • 사과
  • 소비자 선호
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
132 0

0.0%

' 소비자 선호를 반영한 사과의 등급표준화에 관한 연구 = A study on the grading and standardization based on consumer preference : the case of apple' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국식품개발연구원, “농산물 품질등급규격 표준화기술 개발연구”
    농림부 [2002]
  • 한국개발연구원, “한미 FTA 이후, 어떻게 준비할 것인가?: 농수산식품 안전성 확보 및 품질경쟁력 제고”
    한미FTA체결지원단 [2007]
  • 친환경농식품의 생산·소비실태와 시장전망
    김창길 한국농촌경제 연구원 [2012]
  • 소비자행동론
    서성한 도서출판 두남 [2005]
  • 산지유통조직의 규모화와 조직력 강화: 모순과 그 해법
    위태석 시선 집중 GSnJ 제65호 [2008]
  • 사과의 품질결정을 위한 소비자 인식 조사
    김건희 김동만 조순덕 한국식 품저장유통학회지, 제15권 제5호 [2008]
  • 미래창조과학부 농림축산식품부(2015), “첨단 과학기술 기반 농업혁신, 미래부와 농식품부 두 손 맞잡는다”
    보도자료 [2015]
  • 농업경쟁력 저해요인 실태분석을 통한 농업부문 경쟁력 제고 방안 연구
    김병률 한국농촌경제연구원 [2009]
  • 국산 농산물의 브랜드 충성도 형성과정에 관한 연구
    이용학 상품 학연구 제30권 제3호 [2012]
  • 橋本直史(2012), 靑果物流通變容下における「內部規格」化の進展に關する硏究, 北大農硏邦文紀要32(2): 115∼194
  • 『현대농업경제학』
    문팔용 선진문화사 [1994]
  • 『농특산물 통합상표 관리 조례』
    경기도 농정국 [2013]
  • 『농업과학기술 연구조사 분석기준』
    농촌진흥청 [2012]
  • 『SAS를 이용한 다변량 통계분석(제2판)』
    김재희 교우사 [2008]
  • “품질 ‘고급화’의 함정과 블루오션 전략”
    이정환 시선집중 GSnJ 제1호 [2005]
  • “표준등급화를 위한 농산물 품질지수 개발에 관한 연구”
    김유종 고려 대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문 [2012]
  • “축산물의 유통규격 설정에 관한 연구”
    강근호 농촌진흥청 국립축산 과학원 [2010]
  • “주요 채소의 국제 경쟁력 비교 분석”
    김윤두 이철희 한국국제농업개 발학회지 제25권 제1호 [2013]
  • “주요 과채류의 선별 등급화 및 포장개선에 관한 연구”
    서귀수 농촌 진흥청 [1995]
  • “원예작물 경쟁력 제고를 위한 품질관리 방안”
    이병서 농촌진흥청 [2000]
  • “우리나라 농산물의 국제경쟁력 분석”
    이중목 중앙대학교 대학원 산업 경제학과 석사학위 논문 [1996]
  • “사과속성에 대한 소비자 선호분석”
    우수곤 충북대학교 대학원 농업경제 학과 박사학위 논문 [2013]
  • “농산물 표준등급화 문제에 대한 경제적 고찰”
    정복조 고려대학교 논문집 제17호 [1977]
  • “농산물 유통 조성 기능의 효율화방안”
    김원수 한국농촌경제연구원 [1978]
  • “개방화에 대응한 과수산업 발전방안”
    김경필 한국농촌경제연구원 [2004]
  • _______________________(2002), “Marketing Orders, Grading Errors, and Price Discrimination”, AJAE 84(1): 53-66
  • _____________________(2003), “The case for fruit quality: an interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples”, Postharvest Biology and Technology 28: 333-347
  • ______(2006), “United States Standards for Grades of Watermelons”
  • ______(2002), “United States Standards for Grades of Apples”
  • ______(1999), “United States Standards for Grades of Table Grapes”
  • ______(1997), “United States Standards for Grades of Florida Oranges and Tangelos”
  • Yoder, Jillian et al(2014), “Estimating Beef Demand Differentiated by Quality Grade”, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29. Mineapolis, Minnesota.
  • Xiang Bi et al(2011), “Sensory Evaluation and Experimental Auctions: Measuring Willingness to Pay for Specific Sensory Attributes”, American Journal of Agricultural Eonomics. 94(2): 562-568
  • Wilsoon and Norber(2014), “When Higher Quality Does Not Translate to Higher Prices: A Case of Quality and Specialty Coffees from the Cup of Excellence Auctions”, AAEA Annual meeting, July 27-29
  • Wayua et al(2009), “Willingness to Pay for Improved Milk Sensory Characteristics and Assurances in Northern Kenya Using Experimental Auctions”, Presented at IAMA 19th Annual World Symposium Budapest, Hungary 20-21, 2009
  • Waugh(1929), “Quality as a Determinant of Vegetable Prices”, New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 87-88
  • Vicenzina Caputo et al(2012), “Role of Sensory Evaluation of Pears in Consumer Choice”, Agricultural Economics Association’s 2012 Annual Meeting, Seattle
  • United Nations(2014), “UNECE STANDARD FFV-19, Concerning the marketing and commercial quality control of table grapes”
  • USDA(2008), “United States Standards for Grades of Cantaloups”
  • Tina L. Saitone and Richard J. Sexton(2009), “Impacts of Minimum Quality Standards Imposed through Marketing Orders or Related Producer Organizations”, AJAE, 92(1): 164-180
  • The Ohio State University(1991), “Assessing Federal Grade Criteria for Fruits and Vegetables”, College of Agriculture Task Force Report to the Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress, Washington DC Theil, H.(1952-53), “Qualities, Prices and Budget Enquiries”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. XIX(3), No. 50: 129-148
  • Susan Brown and Kevin Maloney(2006), “What Constitutes Eating Quality to a Newyork Consumer and How Do We Measure Quality Objectively?”, New York Fruit Quaterly, 14: 3-6
  • S.R. Jaeger et al(2003), “Consumer-driven product development in the kiwifruit industry”, Food Quality and Preference, 14:187-198
  • Rod J. Polkinghorne et al(2011), “Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology”, Animal Science Journal, 82: 325-333
  • R. Watson et al(2008), “Consumer assessment of eating quality - development of protocols for Meat Standards Australia (MSA) testing”, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48: 1360-1367
  • Pinhas Zusman(1967), “A Theoretical Basis for Determination of Grading and Sorting Schemes”, Journal of Farm Economics, vol 49(1)
  • Nnadozie Orgaguzie et al(2009), “Postharvest assessment of fruit quality parameters in apple using both instruments and an expert panel”, Postharvest Biology and Technology, 52: 279-287
  • Nicholes J. P.(1996), “Fruits and Vegetables. In Quality of the US Agricultural Products”, Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Task Force Report No. 126: 139-157
  • Mueller et al(2010), “Combining discrete choice and informed sensory testing in a two-stage process: Can it predict wine market share?”, Food Quality and Preference, 21(7): 741-754
  • McMath, K.L., Paterson et al(1992), “Factors affecting the sensory perception of sweetness and acidity in kiwifruit”, Acta Horticulturae 297: 489-500
  • McCluskey, J. J. et al(2007), “Effects of Quality Characteristics on Consumer’s Willingness to Pay for Gala Apples”, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Eonomics 55: 217-231
  • Marco Costanigro et al(2010), “Do Taste Buds Trump Labels and Information? A sensory Test and Economic Experiment on Organic and Local Apples”, Presented at the Agricultural & Applied
  • Karen L. Rossiter(2000), “The Effects of Sugars and Acid on Consumer Acceptability of Kiwifruit”, Journal of Sensory Studies 15: 241-250
  • James A. Chalfan et al(1999), “Asymmeteric Grading Error and Adverse Selection : Lemons in the California Prune Industry”, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(1): 57-79
  • J. Bonanay(2013), “Consumer eating quality acceptance of new apple varieties in different European countries”, Food Quality and Preference 30: 250-259
  • Houthakker, H.S. and Prais, S.J.(1952), “Quality Variations in Family Budgets,”, Econometrica, Vol. XX, No. 2: 309-311
  • Hideo Aizaki et al(2009), “A non-compensatory choice modeling analysis of Japanese consumers' preference for beef: A choice experiment approach”, IAAE Conference
  • Griffith, Garry R et al(2012), “The aggregate economic benefits to the Australian beef industry from the adoption of meat standards Australia”, Australasian Agribusiness Review Vol 20
  • George L. Mehren(1961), “The Function of Grades in an Affluent, Standardized-Quality Economy”, Journal of Farm Economics, vol 43
  • George Casella(1992), “Illustrating empirical Bayes methods”, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 16: 107-125
  • Garry Griffith et al(2010), “Meat Standards Australia as an Innovation in the Australian Beef Production and Marketing System”, 2010 International European Forum, 8.2-12, Innsbruck-Igls, Austia
  • Gabrielyan, Gnel et al(2014), “Willingness to Pay for Sensory Attributes in Beer”, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 43(1): 125-139
  • Fernando Mendoza(2014), “Grading of apples based on firmness and soluble solids content using Vis/SWNIR spectroscopy and spectral scattering techniques”, Journal of Food Engineering, 125: 59-68
  • FAO(2005), “Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables”, 12th Session, Mexico City, Mexico, 16-20 May
  • F. Roger Harker et al(2008), “Eating quality standards for apples based on consumer preferences”, Postharvest Biology and Technology 50: 70-78
  • Eivind Vangdal(1985), “Quality Criteria for Fruit for Fresh Consumption”, Acta Agriculture Scandinavica, 35(1): 41-47
  • Economics Association. 2010 AAEA, CAES, & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, July 25-27
  • E. Hoehn(2003), “Efficacy of instrumental measurements for determination of minimum requirements of firmness, soluble solids, and acidity of several apple varieties in comparision to consumer expectations”, Postharvest Biology and Technology, 27: 27-37
  • David A. Hennessy(1995), “Microeconomics of Agricultural Grading: Impacts on the Marketing Channel”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol 77
  • Combris et al(2009), “Food Choices: What do we learn from combining sensory and economic experiments?” Food Quality and Preference, 20(8): 550-557
  • Campbell, B. L. et al(2008), “Mandarin Market Segments Based on Consumer Sensory Evaluations”. Journal of Food Distribution Research 39(3): 43-55
  • Bruce Gardner(2003), “U.S. Food Quality Standards: Fix for Market Failure or Costly Anachronism?”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(3):725-730
  • Benjamin L. Campbell et al(2004), “Fruit Quality Characteristics That Affect Consumer Preferences for Satsuma Mandarins”, HortScience 39(7):1664-1669
  • B. Daillant-Spinnler et al(1996), “Relationships between Perceived Sensory Properties and Major Preference Directions of 12 Varieties of Apples from the Southern Hemisphere”, Food Quality and Preference 7(2):113-126
  • B Br ckner et al(2008), 『Fruit and Vegetable Flavour: Recent Advances and Future Prospects』, Woodhead Publishing Limited: 18-35
  • Anreza(2015), “Impact of appearance on degree of liking and eating quality expectations of selected apple cultivars”, International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 50: 492-499
  • Anna Marin(2002), “Consumers Evaluation of Apple Quality”, Washington Tree Fruit Postharvest Conference, 12∼13.5, Yakima, WA