연구동향 분석
박사

A Study on Optimal Design of Vehicle Structure for Small Overlap Frontal Impact

NGUYENPHUTHUONGLUU 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' A Study on Optimal Design of Vehicle Structure for Small Overlap Frontal Impact' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • barrier design
  • crashworthiness
  • iihs crash test
  • optimal design
  • small-overlap
  • vehicle structure
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
137 0

0.0%

' A Study on Optimal Design of Vehicle Structure for Small Overlap Frontal Impact' 의 참고문헌

  • Zhida, S., Xin, Q., and Haishu, C. (2012). FISTA. BIW Safety PerformanceResearch Based on Vehicle Frontal Crash. Vol. 9, 13-26.
  • Zeidler, F., Knochelmann, F., and Scheunert, D., “Possibilities and Limits in theDesign of Compatible Cars for Real World Accidents,” SAE Paper 1999-01-0068,1999.
  • Yonezawa, H., Hosokawa, N., Mizuno, K. and Kiuchi, S. (2008). Evaluation ofcrash compatibility based on car-to-car crash tests. International Journal of VehicleSafety, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 81-90.
  • World Health Organization (2013). Global Status Report on Road Safety: Time forAction. Retrieved March 4, 2013, fromhttp://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241563840_eng.pdf.
  • Watanabe, T., Hirayama, S., Obayashi, K. and Okabe, T. (2005). Research onStiffness Matching Between Vehicles for Frontal Impact Compatibility. InternationalTechnical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington D.C.,U.S.A.
  • Versmissen, T., Schram, R. and McEvoy, S. (2007). The development of a loadsensing trolley for frontal offset testing. International Journal of Crashworthiness,Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 235 - 245.
  • Verma, M. K., Nagappala, R., Murugan, M. and Tung, Y. J. (2004). Evaluation ofstructural parameters for vehicle crash compatibility. International Journal ofCrashworthiness, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 577 - 586.
  • Urbina, P., Orta, P. and Ahuett, G. H. (2014). Crashworthiness design based on asimplified deceleration pulse. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 6, 909-917.
  • Tolouei, R., Maher, M and Titheridge, H. (2013). Vehicle mass and injury risk intwo-car crashes: A novel methodology. Accident analysis and prevention. Vol. 50,155-166.
  • Thomson, R., Krusper, A., Avramov, N. and Rachid, K. (2008). The Role OfVehicle Design On Structural Interaction. International CrashworthinessConference, Kyoto, Japan.
  • The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (2009). Special Issue: Car size, weightand safety. Status Report Vol. 44, No. 4.
  • Taguchi. G, S. Chowdhury, and S. Taguchi, Robust Engineering. New York:McGraw-Hill, 2000.
  • Steyer, C., Delhommmeau, M., and Delannoy, P., “Proposal to ImproveCompatibility in Head On Collisions,” Paper Number 98-S3-O-05, Proceedings ofthe 16th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles,May 31 to June 4, 1998.
  • Stein, M., Friedemann, D., Eisenach, A., Zimmer, H. and Johannsen, H. (2011).Parametric Modelling of Simplified Car Models for Assessment of Frontal ImpactCompatibility. 8th European LS-DYNA Users Conference, Strasbourg , France.
  • Sherwood, C. P., Mueller, B. C., Nolan, J. M., Zuby, D. S. and Lund, A. K. (2013).Development of a Frontal Small Overlap Crashworthiness Evaluation Test. TrafficInjury Prevention, Vol. 14, No. sup1, pp. S128-S135.
  • Sherwood, C. Insurance institute for highway safety (2012). An update on theIIHS small-overlap research program, 1-35.
  • Sherwood, C. (2009). Characteristics of Small Overlap Crashes. InternationalTechnical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Scullion, P., Morgan, R. M., Mohan, P., Kan, C.-D., Shanks, K., Jin, W. andTangirala, R. (2010). A Reexamination of the Small Overlap Frontal Crash. Annalsof Advances in Automotive Medicine, Vol. 54, No. 137-148.
  • Schramm, U. Designing with structural optimization ? a practical point of view,AIAA paper 2002-5191.
  • Schoeneburg, R., and Pankalla, H., “Implementation and Assessment of Measuresfor Compatible Crash Behavior Using the Aluminum Vehicle as an Example,”Paper Number 98-S3-O-07, Proceedings of the 16th International TechnicalConference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, May 31 to June 4, 1998.
  • Reza Tolouei, Mike Maher and Helena Titheridge (2013). Vehicle Mass and InjuryRisk in Two-car Crashes: A Novel Methodology. Accident Analysis & Prevention.Vol. 50, pp. 155-166
  • Ragland, C. L., “Offset Test Procedure Development and Comparison,” PaperNumber 96-S4-O-01, the Proceedings of the 15th International TechnicalConference on the Enhanced Safety Of Vehicles, May 13-16, 1996. pg. 576.
  • Pipkorn, B., Lundstrom, J. and Ericsson, M. (2011). Safety and VisionImprovements by Expandable A-Pillars. International Technical Conference on theEnhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  • Pipkorn, B. and Kullgren, A. (2009). Effects of active structures on injuries inmedium severity frontal impacts. International Technical Conference on theEnhanced Safety of Vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Pipkorn, B. and Haland, Y. (2005). Proposed variable stiffness of vehiclelongitudinal frontal members. International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 10, No.6, pp. 603 - 608.
  • Patrick L. Chapman, Scott D. sudhoff,” Design and Precise Realization ofOptimized Current Waveform for Switched Reluctance Drive” IEEE Trans. PowerElectronics., vol.17, no. 1, pp. 76-83, 2002.
  • Patel, S., Smith, D., Prasad, A. and Mohan, P. (2007). NHTSA’s recent vehiclecrash test program on compatibility in front to front impacts. InternationalTechnical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Lyon, France.
  • Park, B. T., Partyka, S. C., Morgan, R. M., Hackney, J. R., Lee, J. and Summers, L.(2000). Comparison of vehicle structural intergrity and occupant injury potential infull-frontal and offset-frontal crash tests. SAE paper, NO 2000-01-0879.
  • Ostrowski, M., Holnicki-Szulc, J. and Griskevicius, P. (2007). AdaptiveCrashworthiness of Front-End Structure of Motor Vehicles. 2007 SAE WorldCongress, Detroit, Michigan, SAE International.
  • Oh, S., Ye, B. W. and Sin, H. C. (2007). Size optimization of an engine roommember for crashworthiness using response surface method. Int. J. AutomotiveTechnology 8, 1, 93-102.
  • Nolan, J. IIHS. (2012). Results of small-overlap frontal crash tests. IIHS. 1-18.
  • National Crash Analysis Center (NCAC) The George Washington University.(2005). FE Model of Dodge Grand Caravan, 1-13.
  • NHTSA (2013). Corporate Average Fuel Economy. Retrieved June 5, 2013, fromhttp://www.nhtsa.gov/fuel-economy.
  • NHTSA (2009). Fatalities in frontal crashes despite seat belts and air bags - reviewof all CDS cases model and calendar years 2000-2007: 122 fatalities. U.S.Department of Transportation, Report no. HS 811 202.
  • Murri, R., Caviezel, S., Gerster, B. (2013). Relevance of the IIHS small-overlapcrash test in Europe. Internal study DTC Dynamic Test Center AG, Report numberpSi-13-0130.
  • Mueller, B. C., Sherwood, C., Nolan, J. M. and Zuby, D. S. (2013). Repeatability ofIIHS Frontal Small Overlap Frontal CrashTests. International TechnicalConference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Mooi, H. G., and Huibers, J., “Simple and Effective Lumped Mass Models forDetermining Kinetics and Dynamics of Car-to-Car Crashes,” IJCRASH ’98,Conference Proceedings, Dearborn, Michigan, September 9-11, 1998.
  • Mohammad S. Islam and Iqbal Husain,” Torque-Ripple Minimization with IndirectPosition and Speed Sensing for Switched Reluctance Motors,” IEEE Trans. Ind.Elec., vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1126-1133, 2000.
  • Meyerson, S., Wiacek, C., Delannoy, P. and Robert, G. (2009). Evaluation ofAdvanced Compatibility Frontal Structures Using the Progressive DeformableBarrier (PDB). International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety ofVehicles, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Marklund, P and Nilsson, L. Optimization of a car body component subjected toimpact. Structural and multidisciplinary optimization. Vol 21, 383-392, 2001.
  • Maran, J. P., Manikandan, S., Thirugnanasambandham, K., Nivetha, C. V., Dinesh,R. Box-Behnken design based stastical modeling for ultrasound-assisted extractionof corn silk polysaccharide. Carbohydr. Polym. 92 (2013), 604-11. Doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.020.
  • Lutz Eckstein (2010). Structural design of vehicles. RWTHAACHEN universityGermany.
  • Lund, A. K. and Nolan, J. M. (2003). Changes in Vehicle Designs from FrontalOffset and Side Impact Crash Testing. SAE Paper 2003-01-0902.
  • Lonn, D., O man, M., Nilsson, L. and Simonsson, K. (2009). Finite element basedrobustness study of a truck cab subjected to impact loading. International Journal ofCrashworthiness, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 111-124.
  • Lonn, D., Fyllingen, . and Nilssona, L. (2010). An approach to robustoptimization of impact problems using random samples and meta-modelling. International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 723-734.
  • Lonn, D., Bergman, G., Nilsson, L. and Simonsson, K. (2011). Experimental andfinite element robustness studies of a bumper system subjected to an offset impactloading.International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 155-168.
  • Lee, Y. H., Joo, Y. J., Park, J. S., Kim, Y. S. and Yim, H. J. (2014). Robust designoptimization of frontal structrures for minimizing injury risks of flex pedestrianlegform impactor. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 5, 757-764.
  • Lee, K. W and Lim, J. M. (2014). Comparison on rating methods for female dummyin NCAP frontal impact test. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 6, 919-925.
  • Kwak JS. Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for geometricerror in surface grinding process. Int J Machine Tools Manuf 2005;45:327?34.
  • Kullgren, A., Lie, A. and Tingvall, C. (2010). Comparison between Euro NCAP testresults and real-world crash data. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 587- 593.
  • Kuhn, D. M., Hummel, T. and Bende, J. (2013). Small-Overlap Frontal Impactsinvolving Passenger Cars in Germany. International Technical Conference on theEnhanced Safety of Vehicles, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Krishnamoorthy, C.S. Finite Element Analysis: Theory and Programming, TataMcGraw-Hill, New Delhi, 1999.
  • Kossar, J. M., “Big and Little Car Compatibility,” Fifth International TechnicalConference on Experimental Safety Vehicles, London, June 4-7, 1974.
  • Klanner, W., Felsch, B., and Van west, F., “Evaluation of Occupant Protection andCompatibility Out of Frontal Crash Tests Against the Deformable Barrier,” PaperNumber 98-S3-O-06, Proceedings of the 16th International Technical Conference onthe Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, May 31 to June 4, 1998.
  • Kim, T., W and Jeong, H., Y. (2010). Stochastic analysis of the variation in injurynumbers of automobile frontal crash tests. Int. J. Automotive Technology 11, 4, 481-488.
  • Kikuchi,T., Naokao, T., Watanabe, T., Saeki, H. and Okabe, T. (2012). Aninvestigation of injury factors concerning drivers in vehilces involved in smalloverlapfrontal crashes. SAE paper, NO 2012-01-0599.
  • Khattab, A. A. E. (2011). Investigation of an Adaptable Crash Energy ManagementSystem to Enhance Vehicle Crashworthiness. PhD thesis, Concordia University,Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Kallina, I., “Crashworthiness,” Published as Technical Briefs, Vehicle Aggressivityand Compatibility in Automotive Crashes 2000, SAE publication Number SP-1525,pg. 88-88.
  • Joyce, L., Nate, J. D., Jeff, D., Martin, L., and Ryuuji, O. (2014). A comparison ofthe NHTSA research offset oblique and small overlap impact tests and the IIHSmoderate and small overlap tests. SAE paper, NO 2014-01-0537.
  • Jenefeldt, F. and Thomson, R. (2004). A methodology to assess frontal stiffness toimprove crash compatibility. International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 9, No. 5,pp. 475 - 482.
  • Jakobsson, L., McInally, G., Axelson, A., Lindman, M., Kling, A., Broberg, T.,Fermer, M. and Wagstrom, L. (2013). Severe Frontal Collisions with PartialOverlap ? Two Decades of Car Safety Development. SAE World Congress, Detroit,Michigan, U.S.A.
  • Iqbal Husain, M. Ehsani, “Torque Ripple Minimization in Switched ReluctanceMotor Drives by PWM Current Control,” IEEE Trans. Power Electronics., vol. 11,no.1, pp. 83-88, 1996.
  • Insurance institute for highway safety (2012). Small-overlap program protocol andrating guidelines. IIHS. 1-17.
  • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Small Overlap Frontal CrashworthinessEvaluation Rating Protocol ,Version II , 2012Insurance institute for highway safety (2014). Moderate overlap frontalcrashworthiness evaluation crash test protocol (version XV). IIHS. 1-17.
  • Huang, H., Siddiqui, C. and Abdel-Aty, M. (2011). Indexing crash worthiness andcrash aggressivity by vehicle type. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 4,pp. 1364-1370.
  • Hong, S.W., Park, C.K., Mohan, P. (2008). A study of the IIHS frontal pole impacttest. SAE paper, NO 2008-01-0507.
  • Hollowell, W. T., and Gabler, H. C., “NHTSA’s Vehicle Aggressivity andCompatibility Research Program,” Paper Number 98-S3-O-01, Proceedings of the16th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, May31 to June 4, 1998.
  • Hobbs, C. A., (2000). The Rationale and Development of the Offset DeformableFrontal Impact Test Procedure. SAE Technical Paper Number 950501, (SP-1072).
  • Heiko, J., Thorsten, A., Mervyn, E., Ignacio, L., Ton, V and Robert, T. (2013).Proposal for a frontal impact and compatibility assessment approach based on theEuropean FIMCAR project. Traffic injury prevention, DOI:10.1080/15389588.2013.790538.
  • Hee Jong Yang, Ki Chang Kim, Si Hyung Lim, Chan Mook Kim and Hong Jae Yim,“Design of High Stiffness and Lightweight Body for Stiffness Distribution Ratio”,KSNVE, 2007, Vol. 17, pp. 901-906
  • Han, J. N., Kim, J. S., Park, J. W., Son, C. K and Kim, Y. S. (2012). A study ofoccupant protection simulation for IIHS small overlap frontal crash test. Trans.Korean Society of Automotive Engineers. 1833-1836.
  • Hallquist, J.O. (2007). LS-DYNA Keyword User Manual, Livermore SoftwareTechnology Corporation.
  • Halloway, D. E., Pintar, F., Saunders, J. and Anelli, A. B. (2012). Classifiers toaugment the CDC system to distinguish the role of structure in a frontal impacttaxonomy. SAE paper, NO 2012-01-0575.
  • Gunaraj V, Murugan N. Application of response surface methodologies forpredicting weld base quality in submerged arc welding ofpipes. J Mater Process Technol 1999; 88:266?75.
  • Greenwell, N. K. (2012). Evaluation of the Enhancing Vehicle-to-Vehicle CrashCompatibility Agreement: Effectiveness of the Primary and Secondary Energy-Absorbing Structures on Pickup Trucks and SUVs. U.S. Department ofTransportation, Report no. HS 811 621.
  • Gepner, B., Bojanowski, C., Kwasniewski, L. and Wekezer, J. (2014). Effectivenessof ECE R66 and FMVSS 220 standards in rollover crashworthiness assessment ofparatransit buses. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 4, 581-591.
  • Gabler, H. C., and Hollowell, W. T., “NHTSA’s Vehicle Aggressivity andCompatibility Research Program,” Paper Number 98-S3-O-01, Proceedings ofthe16th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles,May 31 to June 4, 1998.
  • Friedel, B., “EEVC Status Report,” Proceedings of the 16th International TechnicalConference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, May 31 to June 4, 1998.
  • Fredette, M., Mambu, L. S., Chouinard, A. and Bellavance, F. (2008). Safetyimpacts due to the incompatibility of SUVs, minivans, and pickup trucks in twovehiclecollisions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 1987-1995.
  • Forsberg, J. Simulation based crashworthiness design ? Accuracy aspects ofstructural optimization using response surfaces. LIU-TEK-LIC. 2002
  • Farmer, C. M. (2005). Relationships of frontal offset crash test results to real-worlddriver fatality rates. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 31 - 37.
  • FIMCAR Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research (2011). D6.3Documentation for a frontal impact and compatibility assessment approach: Part I.Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.fimcar.eu/results/.
  • European Commission (2013). EU road fatalities. Retrieved March 4, 2013, fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/pdf/observatory/trends_figures.pdf.
  • Etman, L., Adriaens, J., van Slagmaat, M. and Schoofs, A. Crashworthiness designusing multipoint sequential linear programming. Structural optimization, Vol 12,222-228, 1997.
  • Edwards, M., Davies, H., Thompson, A. and Hobbs, A. (2003). Development of testprocedures and performance criteria to improve compatibility in car frontalcollisions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journalof Automobile Engineering, Vol. 217, No. 4, pp. 233-245.
  • Edwards, M., Cuerden, R. and Davies, H. (2007). Current Status of the Full WidthDeformable Barrier Test. International Technical Conference on the EnhancedSafety of Vehicles, Lyon, France.
  • Edwards, M. (2009). Development of a High Deceleration Full Width FrontalImpact Test for Europe. International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safetyof Vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • EVERSAFE (2013). Everyday Safety for Electric Vehicles. Retrieved June 5, 2013,from http://www.eversafe-project.eu/.
  • Donald, E, M (2011). Automobile body structure design. SAE books of interest.
  • Craig, K. J., Stander, N., Dooge, D. A. and Varadappa, S. (2005). Automotivecrashworthiness design using response surface-based variable screening andoptimization. Engineering Computations, Vol. 22, No. 1-2, pp. 38-61.
  • Conroy, C., Tominaga, G. T., Erwin, S., Pacyna, S., Velky, T., Kennedy, F., Sise, M. and Coimbra, R. (2008). The influence of vehicle damage on injury severity ofdrivers in headon motor vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40,No. 4, pp. 1589?1594.
  • Choi, W. M., Kim, J. S., Jung, H. S. and Kwon, T. S. (2011). Effect of punch angleon energy absorbing characteristics of tube-type crash elements. Int. J. AutomotiveTechnology 12, 3, 383-389.
  • Chen, D. Y., Wang, L. M., Wang, C. Z., Yuan, L. K., Zhang, T. Y and Zhang Z. Z.(2015). Finite element based improvement of a light truck design to optimizecrashworthiness. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 1, 39-49.
  • Chauvel, C., Faverjon, G., Bertholon, N., Cuny, S. and Delannoy, P. (2011). Self-Protection and Partner-Protection for New Vehicles (UNECE R94 Amendment). International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles,Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  • Buzeman-Jewkes, D. G., Viano, D. C. and Lovsund, P. (1999). A Multi-bodyIntegrated Vehicle-Occupant Model for Compatibility Studies in Frontal Crashes.Journal of Crash Prevention and Injury Control, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 143 - 154.
  • Brumbelow, M.L., Zuby, D.S. (2012). Impact and injury patterns in frontal crashesof vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection. IIHS paper No 09-0257.USA.
  • Brumbelow, M. and Zuby, D. (2009). Impact and injury patterns in frontal crashesof vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection. International TechnicalConference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Brewer, J., Patel, S., Summers, S., Prasad, A. and Mohan, P. (2011). Accuracy ofAHOF400 with a Moment-Measuring Load Cell Barrier. International TechnicalConference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  • Bois, P.D., Chou, C.C., Fileta, B.B., Khalil, T.B., King, A.L., Mahmood, H.F., Mertz,H.J., Wismans, J. (2004). Vehicle crashworthiness and occupant protection. 11-176.Michigan.
  • Bloch, J-A, and Chevalier, M-C, “In Depth Analysis Offset Frontal Crash Tests InView Of Aggressivity Criteria,” Paper Number 96-S4-O-07, the Proceedings of the15th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, May13-16, 1996. pp. 634.
  • Baker, B. C., Nolan, J. M., O'Neill, B. and Genetos, A. P. (2008). Crashcompatibility between cars and light trucks: Benefits of lowering front-end energyabsorbingstructure in SUVs and pickups. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40,No. 1, pp. 116-125.
  • Austin, R. (2005). Vehicle Aggressiveness in Real World Crashes. InternationalTechnical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington D.C.,U.S.A.
  • Arai, Y., Yamazaki, K., Mizuno, K. and Kubota, H. (2007). Full-Width Tests ToEvaluate Structural Interaction. International Technical Conference on theEnhanced Safety of Vehicles, Lyon, France.