연구동향 분석
박사

답변협상제도의 도입에 관한 연구 : 미국 Plea Bargaining의 발전과정을 중심으로

박종순 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 답변협상제도의 도입에 관한 연구 : 미국 Plea Bargaining의 발전과정을 중심으로' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 미국의 plea bargaining
  • 유죄답변과 관대한 처분
  • 제한적 plea bargaining의 도입
  • 형사사법의 효율성
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
4 0

0.0%

' 답변협상제도의 도입에 관한 연구 : 미국 Plea Bargaining의 발전과정을 중심으로' 의 참고문헌

  • 鈴木一義(Suzuki Kazuyoshi), 台?における司法取引(一), 法學新報
    제118권제11?12호 [2012]
  • 형사정책과 비용편익분석: 사법협조자 형벌감면제 사례를 중심으로
    박경래 한국형사정책연구원, 형사정책연구소식 [2012]
  • 형사절차상 협상에 관한 연구
    박정훈 고려대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2011]
  • 형사소송절차상의 협상제도, 비교형사법연구
    하태훈 제6권 제2호 [2004]
  • 형사소송의 구조와 검사, 피고인의 지위 - 당사자주의와 증거개시제도를 중심으로 -
    한상훈 형사법연구, 제21권 제4호 [2009]
  • 형사소송에서 유죄협상제도(Plea Bargaining)의 도입 가능성, 비교형사법연구
    류전철 제7권 제1호
  • 형사소송법연구
    차용석 박영사 [1982]
  • 형사소송법-쟁점과 미래-
    안성수 박영사 [2009]
  • 형사사법제도의 변천과 인권-당사자주의의 확립-
    김희균 법과 사회 [2008]
  • 현행 프랑스 형사소송법상 plea bargaining
    손병헌 비교형사법연구, Vol.9, No.1
  • 현대적 형사사법에서 공판개혁의 방향-2007년 개정형사소송법의공판개혁에 대한 비평과 전망-
    이상돈 사법(창간호), 2007 [2007]
  • 한국형사법학회 형사소송법개정안에 대한 논평-수사 일반과 강제처분 부분-
    하태훈 형사법연구, 제22권 제4호 [2010]
  • 한국의 공판정 자백과 미국의 유죄답변협상제도, 저스티스
    안성수 통권제91호 [2006]
  • 피해자의 관점에서 유죄답변협상의 제한적 실현
    정도희 형사법연구, 제24권 제2호 [2012]
  • 프랑스의 형사분야 대체분쟁해결제도의 운영현황, 문제점, 개선방안에 대한 연구, 년도 동계 공동학술대회, 한국형사소송법학회?
    강정영 프랑스 형사법연구회, 2014 [2014]
  • 프랑스의 미리 유죄를 인정한 경우의 재판절차 및 활용방안, 국외훈련검사 연구논문집(Ⅲ-1)-유죄협상-
    박성민 법무연수원 [2011]
  • 프랑스 형사증거법 연구-조서와 영상녹화물을 중심으로-, 해외연수검사연구논문집24(2)
    한제희 법무연수원 [2009]
  • 케스터, L. 레너드, 사이먼 정, 세계를 발칵 뒤집은 판결 31(L. LeonardKaster and Simon Chung, Thirty One of the Greatest Trials inWorld History)
    (주) 현암사 [2014]
  • 존 스튜어트 밀 자유론
    서병훈 책세상 [2013]
  • 정의란 무엇인가
    Sandel, Michael J 와이즈베리 [2014]
  • 이태리 형사소송제도, 해외연수검사연구논문집 19(2)
    강경원 법무연수원 [2004]
  • 유죄답변협상 도입의 필요성과 실현 방안
    曺國(Cho Kuk) 저스티스, 통권 제90호 [2006]
  • 옮김, 형평법(Equity, Sarah Worthington)
    임동진 도서출판 소화 [2006]
  • 옮김, 쿠르트 젤만 지음, 제2판 법철학
    윤재왕 세창출판사 [2010]
  • 옮김, 보통법(상)(The Common Law, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.)
    임동진 (주) 알토란 [2009]
  • 옮김, 루제로 앨디서트 지음, 법률가의 논리(Ruggero J. Aldisert,Logic for Lawyers: A guide to Legal Thinking)
    이양수 씨아이알 [2010]
  • 옮김, 루돌프 폰 예링, 권리를 위한 투쟁
    윤철홍 책세상 [2009]
  • 영미법해설: 형사소송
    김용진 박영사 [2009]
  • 영국의 Plea Bargaining 제도 고찰
    김동주 형사법의 신동향 통권 제27호 [2010]
  • 수사체계와 검찰문화의 새 지평
    김일수 세창출판사 [2010]
  • 사법협조자 형벌감면제도에 대한 고찰, 형사법의 신동향 통권 제23호
    김영기 대검찰청 [2009]
  • 사법협조자 소추면제 형벌감면제도의 원류
    박종순 형사법의 신동향 통권제40호 [2013]
  • 사법제도개혁추진위원회
    미국출장결과보고 [2005]
  • 사법연수원
    외국법 미국형사법 [2011]
  • 사법개혁 리포트
    김선수 박영사 [2008]
  • 북아일랜드(Northern Ireland)의 사법협조자(Supergrass)에 대한 소고(小考)
    박종순 인권과 정의 Vol. 439 [2014]
  • 변용란 옮김, 앨런 M. 더쇼비츠의 최고의 변론(The Best Defense
    Alan M
  • 법원행정처
    형사소송법 개정법률 해설 [2007]
  • 법원행정처
    사법개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅶ) 국민과 함께하는 사법개혁-사법개혁위원회 백서- [2005]
  • 법무연수원
    법죄백서, 2014 [2013]
  • 법무부
    프랑스 형법 [2008]
  • 법무부
    개정 형사소송법 [2007]
  • 법무부
    프랑스 형사소송법 [2011]
  • 법무부
    독일 형사소송법 [2012]
  • 법률영어사전
    이태희 임홍근 법문사 [2008]
  • 법과 정치-보통법의 길-
    김홍우 도서출판 인간사랑 [2012]
  • 범죄및 형사정책에 대한 법경제학적 접근(Ⅲ) : 비용편익분석을 중심으로
    김수동 김용호 박경래 성우제 임혜준 최성락 경제·인문사회연구회 협동연구 총서 11-36-01 연구총서11-21, 한국형사정책연구원
  • 밀의 공리주의(로저 크리스프, Mill on Utilitarianism)
    엄성우 철학과 현실사 [2014]
  • 미국의 답변협상 실태와 자백감면절차 도입방안, Plea Bargaining제도에 관한 연구
    김봉주 대검찰청 [2006]
  • 미국법의 역사와 문화(The Magic Mirror:Law in AmericanHistory, Kermit L. Hall Peter Karsten)
    손세정 라티오 [2009]
  • 미국 형사소송법
    서철원 법원사 [2005]
  • 미국 유죄답변 협상의 활용실태와 도입가능성, 국외훈련검사연구논문집(Ⅲ-1)-유죄협상-
    유상민 법무연수원 [2011]
  • 미국 답변협상제도에 관한 연구
    최찬영 법무연수원 [2005]
  • 미국 각 주의 Plea Bargaining 실제 사례 연구, 국외훈련검사연구논문집28(1)
    박준영 법무연수원 [2013]
  • 독일 형사소송법의 최근 경향 -협상에 관한 논의를 중심으로-
    손미숙 한국형사소송법학회 발표문(미발행) [2014]
  • 독일 형사소송법상 협상제도의 도입과정책적 함의
    김성룡 박미숙 이진국 조상제 한국형사정책연구원 [2009]
  • 대학생을 위한 서양철학사
    양해림 집문당 [2012]
  • 대만의 유죄인정협상제도 연구, 국외훈련검사 연구논문집(Ⅲ-1)-유죄협상-
    김석담 법무연수원 [2011]
  • 국제형사증거법
    백기봉 박영사 [2008]
  • 공범증인면책제도에 관한 연구-비교법적 고찰을 중심으로-
    박종순 고려대학교석사학위논문 [2010]
  • 검사의 지위에 관한 연구-형사사법체계와의 관련성을 중심으로-,서울대학교 대학원
    이완규 법학박사학위논문 [2005]
  • 개정된 형사소송법의 운용
    오기두 저스티스 통권 제103호 [2008]
  • 長沼範良(ながぬま のりよし) 번역, Joseph Hoffmann, 眞實と日本刑事訴訟法
    ジュリスト. No. 1148 [1999]
  • 福島 至(ふくしま いたる), 刑事司法と取引, 刑法雜誌, 第42卷 第3?, 2003.
  • 畑 博行 번역, 裁判と司法取引-最近の硏究と新しい問題-(Joel Rosch, Trialsand Plea Bargaining: Recent Findings and NewQuestions)
    判例タイムズ, No. 511 [1984]
  • 田口守一(たぐち もりかず), 刑事訴訟の目的, 成文堂, 2010.
  • 田口守一 飜譯, ドイツ刑事手續における合意, 刑事法ジャ-ナル, Vol. 24,2010, p.56. (Henning Rosenau, Absprachen im deutschenStrafverfahren, in: Rosenau, H./Kim, S.(Hrsg),Straftheorie und Strafgerechtigkeit, Frankfurt a. M. 2010.)
  • 王兆鵬(?本雅記 譯), 台?刑事司法改革の成功, 名城法學, 제55권제4호(平成18년)司法改革と國民參加, 司法制度改革審議會中間報告をめぐって
    ジュリスト,No. 1198 [2001]
  • 池田公博(いけだ きみひろ)〈譯〉, ト-マス ヴァイゲント, ドイツにおける刑事手續の過去,現在,そして未來(T. Weigend, DasStrafverfahren in Deutschland gestern, heute undmorgen), 刑法雜誌, 第49卷, 第2,3合倂?, 2010.
  • 松田岳士(まつだ?たけし), イタリアの刑事裁判と合意手續, 刑事法ジャ-ナル, No. 22, 2010.
  • 松田岳士(まつだ?たけし), イタリアにおける豫審廢止と新刑事手續の構造(二,完), 法學論叢, 第144卷 第3?, 京都大學法學會, 1998.
  • 平良木登規男(ひららぎ ときお), 第二版 搜査法, 成文堂, 2000.
  • 宇川春彦(うかわ はるひこ), 司法取引を考える(1)~(17), 判例時報, 1583?~1627?, 1998.
  • 三井誠(みつい まこと), 刑事免責(1), 法學敎室, No. 225, 有斐閣, 1999.
  • ‘04 프랑스 개정 형사소송법 연구
    김유철 해외연수검사연구논문집22(2)법무연수원 [2006]
  • http://www.innocenceproject.org, When the Innocent Plead Guilty.
  • Zacharias, Fred C., Justice in Plea Bargaining, William & Mary LawReview, Vol. 39, 1998.
  • Young, William G., Vanishing Trials, Vanishing Juries, VanishingConstitution, Suffolk University Law Review, 2006.
  • Wright, Ronald and Miller, Marc, Honesty and Opacity in Charge Bargains,Stanford Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2003.
  • Wright, Ronald F., Trial Distortion and the End of Innocence in FederalCriminal Justice, University of Pennsylvania Law Review,Vol. 154, No. 1, 2005.
  • Worden, Alissa Pollitz, Policymaking by prosecutors: the uses of discretionin regulating plea bargaining, Judicature Vol. 73, No. 6,1990.
  • Wishingrad, Jay, The Plea Bargaining in Historical Perspective, BuffaloLaw Review, Vol. 23, 1973-1974.
  • Weninger, Robert A., The Abolition of Plea Bargaining: A Case Study ofEl Paso County, Texas, UCLA Law Review, Vol. 35, 1987.
  • Weinstein, Ian, “Regulating the Market for Snitches”, Buffalo LawReview, Vol. 47, 1999.
  • Weigend, Thomas, The Decay of the Inquisitorial Ideal: Plea BargainingInvades German Criminal Procedure(Crime, Procedure andEvidence in a Comparative and International Context), HartPublishing, 2008.
  • Weigend, Thomas & Turner, Jenia Iontcheva, The Constitutionality ofNegotiated Criminal Judgments in Germany, German LawJournal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2014.
  • Vogel, Mary E., The Social Origins of Plea Bargaining: Conflict and theLaw in the Process of State Formation, 1830-1860, Law &Society Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1999.
  • Vogel, Mary E., The Social Origins of Plea Bargaining: An Approach tothe Empirical Study of Discretionary Leniency?, Journal ofLaw and Society, Vol. 35, 2008.
  • Turner, Jenia Iontcheva, Judicial Participation in Plea Negotiation: AComparative View, The American Journal of ComparativeLaw, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2006.
  • Turner, Jenia I. and Chodosh, Hiram E., Plea Bargaining Across BordersCriminal Procedure, Wolters Kluwer, 2009.
  • Tsujimoto, norio, 刑事手續における取引(3), 近畿大學法學, 第59卷第1?,2011.
  • Tsujimoto, norio, 刑事手續における取引(2), 近畿大學法學, 第58卷第1?,2010.
  • Thaman, Stephen C., World Plea Bargaining Consensual Procedures andthe Avoidance of the Full Criminal Trial, CarolinaAcademic Press, 2010.
  • Thaman, Stephen C., Plea-Bargaining, Negotiating Confessions andConsensual Resolution of Criminal Cases, Electronic Journalof Comparative Law, Vol. 11.3, 2007.
  • Thaman, Stephen C., Comparative Criminal Procedure A CasebookApproach, Carolina Academic Press, 2008.
  • Tak, Peter J. P., Deals with Criminals : Supergrasses, Crown Witnessesand Pentiti, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law andCriminal Justice, Vol. 5/1, 1997.
  • Swigert, Victorial Lynn and Farrell, Ronald A., Normal Homicides and theLaw, American Sociological Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1977.
  • Swenson, Thomas, The German “Plea Bargaining” Debate, PaceInternational Law Review Vol. 7, No. 2, 1995.
  • Sudnow, David, Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code ina Public Defender Office, Social Problems, Vol. 12, No. 3,1965.
  • Stuntz, William J., Plea Bargaining and Criminal Law’s DisappearingShadow, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 117, No. 8, 2004.
  • Strader, J. Kelly, Understanding White Collar Crime(Second Edition),LexisNexis, 2006.
  • Steinberg, Allen, “From Private Prosecution to Plea Bargaining: CriminalProsecution, the District Attorney, and American LegalHistory”, Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1984.
  • Sprack, John, A Practical Approach to Criminal Procedure Twelfth Edition,Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • Simons, Michael A., Retribution for Rats: Cooperation, Punishment, andAtonement, Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2003.
  • Siegel, Larry J. and Worrall, John L., Thirteenth Edition Introduction toCriminal Justice, Wadsworth, 2012.
  • Siegel, Larry J. and Schmalleger, Frank and Worrall, John L., Courts andCriminal Justice in America, Prentice Hall, 2011.
  • Sherman, Marc L., Informal Immunity: Don’t You Let That Deal GoDown, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 21, 1987.
  • Scott, Robert E. and Stuntz, William J., Plea Bargaining as Contract, TheYale Law Journal, Vol. 101, No. 8, 1992.
  • Schulhofer, Stephen J., Plea Bargaining as Disaster, The Yale LawJournal, Vol. 101, No. 8, 1992.
  • Schulhofer, Stephen J., Is plea Bargaining Inevitable?, Harvard LawReview, Vol. 97, No. 5, 1984.
  • Schulhofer, Stephen J., Criminal Justice Discretion as a Regulatory System,The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 17, 1988.
  • Saltzburg, Stephen A. and Capra, Daniel J., American Criminal ProcedureCases and Commentary Sixth Edition, West Group, 2000.
  • Russell, M. J., Ⅱ Trial By Battle and the Appeals of Felony, The Journalof Legal History, 1:2, 1980.
  • Rubinstein, Michael L. and White, Teresa J., Alaska's Ban on Pleabargaining, Law & Society Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1979.
  • Rowland, Ann C., Effective Use of Informants and Accomplice Witnesses,South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 50, 1999.
  • Rosett, Arthur and Cressey, Donald R., Justice by Consent: plea bargainsin the American courthouse, J.B. Lippincott Company,1976.
  • Rorkasten, Jens, Some problems of the evidence of fourteenth centuryapprovers, The Journal of Legal History, 5:3, 1984.
  • Richman, Daniel, Cooperating Defendants: The Costs and Benefits ofPurchasing Information from Scoundrels, FederalSentencing Reporter, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1996.
  • Richman, Daniel, Cooperating Clients, Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 56,1995.
  • Reimelt, Alexandra W., An Unjust Bargain: Plea Bargains and Waiver ofthe Right to Appeal, Boston College Law Review, Vol.51, 2010.
  • Rauxloh, Regina E., Formalization of Plea Bargaining in Germany: Will theNew Legislation Be Able to Square the Circle?, FordhamInternational Law Journal, Vol. 34, 2011.
  • Post, J. B., The Evidential Value of Approvers’ Appeals : The Case ofWilliam Rose, 1389, Law and History Review, Vol. 3,No. 1, 1985.
  • Plea Bargaining 제도 도입을 위한 입법안 검토, Plea Bargaining제도에 관한 연구
    백기봉 대검찰청 검찰미래기획단 [2006]
  • Pizzi, William T., Prosecutorial Discretion, Plea Bargaining and theSupreme Court’s Opinion in Bordenkircher v. Hayes,Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 6, 1978.
  • Pizzi, William T., Batson v. Kentucky: Curing the Disease but Killing thePatient, The Supreme Court Review, 1987.
  • Pizzi, William T. and Marafioti, Luca, The New Italian Code of CriminalProcedure: The Difficulties of Building an AdversarialTrial System on a Civil Law Foundation, The Yale Journalof International Law Vol. 17, No 1, 1992.
  • Piehl, Anne Morrison and Bushway, Shawn D., Measuring and ExplainingCharge Bargaining, Journal of Quantitative Criminology,2007.
  • Pallone, Nathaniel, J., Without Plea-Bargaining, Megan Kanka would bealive today, Criminology & Pub. Pol’y, Vol. 3, No. 1,2003.
  • O’Hear, Michael M., Plea Bargaining and Victims: From Consultation toGuidelines, Marquette Law Review, Vol. 91, 2007.
  • Owen, Tim QC, Bailin, Alex et al., Blackstone’s Guide to The SeriousOrganised Crime and Police Act 2005, Oxford UniversityPress, 2005.
  • Ormerod, David et al., Blackstone’s Criminal Practice, Oxford UniversityPress, 2010.
  • Oppel Jr, Richard A., Sentencing Shift Gives New Leverage toProsecutors, The New York Times, 9. 25. 2011.
  • O'Hear, Michael M., Plea Bargaining and Procedural Justice, Georgia LawReview, Vol. 42, 2008.
  • Novak, William J., The People’s Welfare -Law and Regulation inNineteenth-Century America, The University of NorthCarolina Press, 1996.
  • Musson, A. J., Turning King’s Evidence: The Prosecution of Crime inLate Medieval England, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,Vol. 19., 1999.
  • Moley, Raymond, The Vanishing Jury, Southern California Law Review,Vol. Ⅱ, No. 2, 1928.
  • Mnookin, Jennifer L., Uncertain Bargains: The Rise of Plea Bargaining inAmerica, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 57, No. 5, 2005.
  • Misner, Robert L., Recasting Prosecutorial Discretion, Journal of CriminalLaw and Criminology, Vol. 86, 1996.
  • Miller, Justin, The Compromise of Criminal Cases, Southern California LawReview, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1927.
  • McDonald, William F., The Prosecutor, Sage Publications(Klaus Sessar,Prosecutorial Discretion in Germany), 1979.
  • McConville, Mike and Mirsky, Chester, The Rise of Guilty Pleas: NewYork, 1800-1865, Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 22, No.4, 1995.
  • McConville, Mike and Mirsky, Chester L, Jury Trials and Plea Bargaining:A True History, Hart Publishing Oxford and Portland,Oregon, 2005.
  • Mazur, Eli Paul, Rational Expectations of Leniency: Implicit PleaAgreements and the Prosecutor’s Role as a Minister ofJustice, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 51, No. 4, 2002.
  • Marcus, Michael H. and Weissbrodt, David S., The Death Penalty Cases,California Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 5, 1968.
  • Ma, Yue, Prosecutorial Discretion and Plea Bargaining in the UnitedStates, France, Germany, and Italy: A ComparativePerspective, International Criminal Justice Review, Vol.12, 2002.
  • Lynch,, David, The Impropriety of Plea Agreements: A Tale of TwoCounties, Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1994.
  • Lynch, Timothy, The Case Against Plea Bargaining, Regulation, 2003.
  • Lynch, Gerard E., Screening versus Plea Bargaining: Exactly What AreWe Trading off?, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 4,2003.
  • Lippke, Richard L., The Ethics of Plea Bargaining, Oxford UniversityPress, 2011.
  • Levenson, Laurie L., Peeking Behind the Plea Bargaining Process: Missouriv. Frye & Lafler v. Cooper, Loyola of Los Angeles LawReview, Vol. 46, 2013.
  • Levenson, Laurie L., A Guide to Negotiating Federal Guilty Pleas in aPost-Gall Sentencing World, Criminal Justice, Vol. 23, No.3, 2008.
  • Langer, Maximo, From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: TheGlobalization of Plea Bargaining and the AmericanizationThesis in Criminal Procedure, Harvard International LawJournal Vol. 45, 2004.
  • Langbein, John H., “The Origins of Public Prosecution at CommonLaw”, The American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 17,No.4, 1973.
  • Langbein, John H., Understanding the Short History of Plea Bargaining,Law & Society Review, Vol. 13, No 2, 1979.
  • Langbein, John H., Torture and the Law of Proof, The University ofChicago Press, 1977.
  • Langbein, John H., Torture and Plea Bargaining, The University ofChicago Law Review, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1978.
  • Langbein, John H., The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial, OxfordUniversity Press, 2010.
  • Langbein, John H., Shaping the Eighteenth-Century Criminal Trial: A Viewfrom the Ryder Sources, The University of Chicago LawReview, Vol. 50, No 1, 1983.
  • Langbein, John H., Land without Plea Bargaining:How the Germans Do It,Michigan Law Review, Vol. 78, 1979.
  • Kuhne, Hans-Heiner, Das Modell der Absprachen im deutschenStrafverfahrensrecht,(번역, 안미라)
    형사법의 신동향 통권제29호 [2010]
  • Kramer, John H. and Ulmer, Jeffery T., Sentencing Guidelines: Lessonsfrom Pennsylvania, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2009.
  • Klerman, Daniel, Settlement and the Decline of Private Prosecution inThirteenth-Century England, Law and History Review,Vol. 19, No. 1, 2001.
  • Klein, Susan R., Enhancing the Judicial Role in Criminal Plea andSentence Bargaining, Texas Law Review, Vol. 84, 2006.
  • Klaus Volk의 독일 형사소송법
    Volk, Klaus 박영사 [2009]
  • King, Nancy J., Judicial Oversight of Negotiated Sentences in a World ofBargained Punishment, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 58, No.1, 2005.
  • Kim Hakseong, Plea Bargaining in the civil law countries: A Proposal forthe introduction of Plea Bargaining in the Korean criminaljustice system, Indiana University, 2009.
  • Kerscher, Martin, Plea Bargaining in South Africa and Germany,Stellenbosch University, 2013.
  • Kerr, Margaret H., Angevin Reform of the Appeal of Felony, Law andHistory Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1995.
  • Israel, Jerold H. and LaFAVE, Wayne R., Criminal Procedure ConstitutionalLimitations in a Nutshell, Thomson West, 2006.
  • Hughes, Graham, Agreements for Cooperation in Criminal Cases,Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1992.
  • Howe, Scott W., The Value of Plea Bargaining, Oklahoma Law Review,Vol. 58, 2005.
  • Hillyard, Paddy and Percy-Smith, Janie, Converting Terrorists: The Use ofSupergrasses in Northern Ireland, Journal of Law andSociety, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1984.
  • Hew, Jr, Maurice, Under the Circumstances: Padilla v. Kentucky stillexcuses Fundamental fairness and leaves professionalresponsibility lost, Boston College Journal of Law & SocialJustice, Vol. 32, 2012.
  • Heumann, Milton, Plea Bargaining. The Experiences of Prosecutors,Judges, and Defense Attorneys, The University of ChicagoPress Chicago and London, 1978.
  • Heumann, Milton, A Note on Plea Bargaining and Case Pressure, Law &Society Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1975.
  • Hessick Ⅲ, F. Andrew & Saujani, Reshma M., Plea Bargaining andConvicting the Innocent: the Role of the Prosecutor, theDefense Counsel, and the Judge, B.Y.U. Journal of PublicLaw, Vol. ⅩⅥ, 2002.
  • Herrmann, Joachim, Bargaining Justice-A Bargain for German CriminalJustice?, University of Pittsburgh Law Review Vol. 53,1992.
  • Heller, Kevin Jon and Dubber, Markus D., The Handbook of ComparativeCriminal Law, Stanford Law Books, 2011.
  • Harris, Ronald A. and Springer, J. Fred, Plea Bargaining as a Game: Anempirical analysis of negotiated sentencing decisions, PolicyStudies Review, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1984.
  • Harris, George C., Testimony for Sale: The Law and Ethics of Snitchesand Experts, Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 28, 2000.
  • Hamil, Frederick C., The King’s Approvers: A Chapter in the History ofEnglish Criminal Law, Speculum, Vol. 11. No. 2, 1936.
  • Haller, Mark H., Plea Bargaining: The Nineteenth Century Context, Law &Society Review, Vol. 13, No 2, 1979.
  • Gross, Samuel R., Convicting Innocent, Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2008.
  • Gross, Samuel R. and Shaffer, Michael, Exonerations in the United States,1989-2012 Report by the National Registry of Exonerations,June, 2012.
  • Greer, Steven C., Supergrasses and the Legal system in Britain andNorthern Ireland, The Law Quarterly Review, Vol. 102,1986.
  • Gowdy, Bryan S., Leniency Bribes: Justifying the Federal Practice ofOffering Leniency for Testimony, Louisiana Law Review,Vol. 60, No. 2, 2000.
  • Goldstein, Abraham S. and Marcus, Martin, The Myth of JudicialSupervision in Three “Inquisitorial“ Systems : France,Italy, and Germany, The Yale Law Journal Vol. 87, No.2,1977.
  • Gerstein, Charlie, Plea Bargaining and the Right to Counsel at BailHearings, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 111, 2013.
  • Gerber, Rudolph J., On Dispensing Injustice, Arizona Law Review, Vol. 43,2001.
  • Gazal, Oren, Partial Ban on Plea Bargains, Law & Economics WorkingPapers Archive: 2003-2009, Art. 59, 2005.
  • Frohmann, Lisa, Prosecutors and Prosecution, Ashgate, 2008.
  • Friedman, Lawrence M., Plea Bargaining in Historical Perspective, Law &Society Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1979.
  • Friedman, Lawrence M., Crime and Punishment in American History, BasicBooks, 1993.
  • Frase, Richard S. and Weigend, Thomas, German Criminal Justice as aGuide to American Law Reform:Similar Problems, BetterSolutions?, Boston College International and ComparativeLaw Review Vol. 18, No. 2, 1995.
  • Frankel, Marvin E., The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View, Universityof Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 123, No. 5. 1975.
  • Fisher, George, Plea Bargaining’s Triumph, Stanford University Press,2003.
  • Finkelstein, Michael O., A Statistical Analysis of Guilty Plea Practices inthe Federal Courts, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 89, No. 2,1975.
  • Feeley, Malcolm M., Perspectives on Plea Bargaining, Law & SocietyReview, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1979.
  • Feeley, Malcolm M., Legal Complexity and the Transformation of theCriminal Process: The Origins of Plea Bargaining, Israel LawReview, Vol. 31, 1997.
  • Emmelman, Debra S., Trial by Plea Bargain: Case Settlement as a Productof Recursive Decisionmaking, Law & Society Review, Vol. 30,No. 2, 1996.
  • Emmelman, Debra S., Justice for the Poor. A Study of Criminal DefenseWork, Ashgate, 2003.
  • Edwards, John S., Professional Responsibilities of the Federal Prosecutor,University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 17, 1983.
  • Easterbrook, Frank H., Plea Bargaining as Compromise, The Yale LawJournal, Vol. 101, No. 8, 1992.
  • Easterbrook, Frank H., Criminal Procedure as a Market System, TheJournal of Legal Studies, Vol. 12, 1983.
  • Diskant, Edward B., Comparative Corporate Criminal Liability: Exploringthe Uniquely American Doctrine Through ComparativeCriminal Procedure, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 118, No. 1,2008.
  • Deutscher Bundestag 16. Wahlperiode, 2009. 3. 18. Gesetzentwurf derBundesregierung.
  • Dervan, Lucian E., Bargained Justice: Plea Bargaining's Innocence Problemand The Brady Safety-Valve, Utah Law Review, No. 1,2012.
  • Dervan , Lucian E. and Edkins Ph.D., Vanessa A. Edkins, The InnocentDefendant's Dilemma: An Innovative Empirical Study ofPlea Bargaining's Innocence Problem, Journal of CriminalLaw and Criminology, Vol. 103, 2013.
  • Dershowitz)
    이미지박스 [2011]
  • Delmas-Marty, Mireille and Spencer, J. R., European Criminal Procedures,Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • Del Carmen, Rolando V., Criminal Procedure Law and Practice 8th Edition,Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010.
  • Damaska, Mirjan, Negotiated Justice in International Criminal Courts,Journal of International Criminal Justice 2, 2004.
  • Covey, Russell, Reconsidering the Relationship between CognitivePsychology and Plea Bargaining, Marquette Law Review, Vol.91, 2007.
  • Covey, Russell, D., Longitudinal Guilt: Repeat Offenders, Plea Bargaining,and the Variable Standard of Proof, Florida Law Review, Vol.63, 2011.
  • Covey, Russell D., Signaling and Plea Bargaining’s Innocence Problem,Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 66, 2009.
  • Cook, Julian A., Federal Guilty Pleas under Rule 11: The UnfulfilledPromise of the Post-Boykin Era, Notre Dame Law Review,Vol. 77, 2002.
  • Combs, Nancy Amoury, Copping a Plea to Genocide: The Plea Bargainingof International Crimes, University of Pennsylvania LawReview, Vol, 151, No. 1, 2002.
  • Colquitt, Joseph A., Ad Hoc Plea Bargaining, Tulane Law Review, Vol. 75,No.3, 2001.
  • Church Jr., Thomas W., In Defense of "Bargain Justice", Law & SocietyReview, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1979.
  • Carns, Teresa White and Kruse, John A., Alaska's ban on plea bargainingreevaluated, Judicature, Vol. 75, No. 6, 1992.
  • Caldwell, H. Mitchell, Coercive Plea Bargaining: The Unrecognized Scourgeof the Justice System, Catholic University Law Review, Vol.61, 2011.
  • Bushway, Shawn D. and Redlich, Allison D., Is Plea Bargaining in the“Shadow of the Trial” a Mirage?, J Quant Criminol, 2011.
  • Brown, Darryl K., The Perverse Effects of Efficiency in Criminal Process,Virginia Law Review, Vol. 100, 2014.
  • Brereton, David and Casper, Jonathan D., Does It Pay to Plead Guilty?Differential Sentencing and the Functioning of CriminalCourts, Law & Society Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1981.
  • Bradley, Craig M. and Hoffmann, Joseph L., Public Perception, Justice,and the “Search for Truth” in Criminal Cases, SouthernCalifornia Law Review, Vol. 69, 1996.
  • Boyne, Shawn, Is the Journey from the In Box to the Out Box a StraightLine?: The Prosecution of Low Level Criminality in Germany,Social Science Research Network, 2010.
  • BowmanⅢ, Frank O. and Heise, Michael, Quiet Rebellion?Ⅱ: An EmpiricalAnalysis of Declining Federal Drug Sentences Including Datafrom the District Level, Iowa Law Review, Vol. 87, 2002.
  • BowmanⅢ, Frank O. and Heise, Michael, Quiet Rebellion? ExplainingNearly a Decade of Declining Federal Drug Sentences, IowaLaw Review, Vol. 86, 2001.
  • Bowers, Josh, Punishing the Innocent, University of Pennsylvania LawReview, Vol. 156, No. 5, 2008.
  • Bowers, Josh, Grassroots Plea Bargaining, University of Chicago LawSchool, 2007.
  • Bonner, David, Combating Terrorism:Supergrass Trials in Northern Ireland,The Modern Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, 1988.
  • Boland, Barbara and Forst, Brian, Prosecutors Don't Always Aim to Pleas,Federal Probation, 1985.
  • Blumberg, Abraham S., The Practice of Law as Confidence Game:Organizational Cooptation of a Profession, Law & SocietyReview, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1967.
  • Bjerk, David, Making the Crime Fit the Penalty: The Role of ProsecutorialDiscretion under Mandatory Minimum Sentencing, Journal ofLaw and Economics, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2005.
  • Bibas, Stephanos, The Machinery of Criminal Justice, Oxford UniversityPress, 2012,Bibas, Stephanos, Incompetent Plea Bargaining and Extrajudicial Reforms,Harvard Law Review, Vol. 126, 2012.
  • Bibas, Stephanos, Regulating the Plea-Bargaining Market : From CaveatEmptor to Consumer Protection, California Law Review, Vol.99, 2011.
  • Bibas, Stephanos, Plea Bargaining outside the Shadow of Trial, HarvardLaw Review, Vol. 117, No. 8, 2004.
  • Beeman, Y. A., Accomplice Testimony under Contingent Plea Agreements,Cornell Law Review, Vol. 72, 1987.
  • Becker Jr., Loftus E., Plea Bargaining and the Supreme Court, Loyola ofLos Angeles Law Review, Vol. 21, 1988.
  • Barry, James D.E, A Barrister’s Role in the Plea Decision: An analysis ofdrivers affecting advice in the Crown Court, Queen Mary,University of London Submitted for PhD, 2010.
  • Ball, Jeremy D., Is It a Prosecutor's World? Determinants of CountBargaining Decisions, Journal of Contemporary CriminalJustice, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2006.
  • Baldwin, John and McConville, Michael, Plea Bargaining and PleaNegotiation in England, Law & Society Review, Vol. 13, No.2, 1979.
  • Baldwin, John and McConville, Michael, Negotiated Justice. Pressures toPlead Guilty, Martin Robertson, 1977.
  • Ashworth, Andrew and Redmayne, Mike, The Criminal Process FourthEdition, Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • Amodio, Ennio and Selvaggi, Eugenio, An Accusatorial System in a CivilLaw Country: The 1988 Italian Code of Criminal Procedure,Temple Law Review Vol. 62, 1989.
  • Amar, Akhil Reed, The Constitution and Criminal Procedure. YaleUniversity press, 1998.
  • Amar, Akhil Reed, The Bill of Rights as a Constitution, The Yale LawJournal, Vol. 100, No. 5, 1991.
  • Alschuler, Albert W., The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining, TheUniversity of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 36, No 1, 1968.
  • Alschuler, Albert W., Plea Bargaining And Its History, Columbia LawReview, Vol. 79. No. 1, 1979.
  • Alschuler, Albert W., Implementing the Criminal Defendant’s Right toTrial: Alternatives to the Plea Bargaining System, TheUniversity of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 3, 1983.
  • Allen, Ronald Jay and Stuntz, William J. et al., Comprehensive CriminalProcedure Third Edition, Wolters Kluwer, 2011.
  • Alkon, Cynthia, The U.S. Supreme Court’s Failure to Fix Plea Bargaining:The Impact of Lafler and Frye, Hastings Constitutional LawQuarterly, Vol. 41, 2014.
  • (역), 정의를 위한 투쟁: 미국 펜실바니아주의 양형개혁(Jeffery ToddUlmer Ph. D., The Struggle for Justice: Sentencing Reform inthe U.S. State of Pennsylvania), 초청강연회 자료집
    이민식 한국형사정책연구원 [2007]