SAM 학술관계분석서비스

논문영향력 요약
주제	gats international investment law
41	0	0.0%

논문영향력
주제	주제별 논문수	주제별 피인용횟수	주제별 논문영향력
주제어	gats	34	0	0.0%
international investment law	7	0	0.0%
계		41	0	0.0%
* 다른 주제어 보유 논문에서 피인용된 횟수	0

Zleptnig, S., Non-Economic Objectives in WTO Law, (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2010).

Zdouc, W., “WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to the GATS”, Journal ofInternational Economic Law, (1999).

Zacharias, “Article I GATS”, Wolfrum, P.T. Stoll & Feinaugle (eds), WTO - Trade inServices, Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, (Martinus MijnhoffPublishers, 2008).

Yukos Universal Ltd (Isle of Man) v. The Russian Federation, Interim Award onJurisdiction and Liability, UNCITRAL (30 November 2009).

Young, M., “The WTO’s Use of Relevant Rules of International Law: An Analysis ofthe Biotech Case”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Volume 56, Issue04, (2007).

Yearwood, R., The Interaction between WTO Law and External International Law:the Constrained Openness of WTO Law, (Routledge, 2012).

Yaung Chi Oo Trading Pte. Ltd. v. Republic of Myanmar, Award, ASEAN I.D. CaseNo. ARB/01/1 (31 March 2003).

Yannaca-Small, C., "Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International209Investment Law", Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD) Working Papers on International Investment, No. 3, (2004).

Wouters and Coppens, “Domestic Regulation within the Framework of GATS”,Working Paper, Volume 93, Institute for International Law, (2006), available athttp://www.law.kuleuven.be/iir/engYannaca-Small, C., "Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in InternationalInvestment Law", Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD) Working Papers on International Investment, No. 3, (2004).

Woolf, Jowell and Le Sueur, De Smith's Judicial Review, 6th edition, (Sweet &Maxwell, 2007).

Wisner, R. & Gallus, R., “Nationality Requirements in Investor-State Arbitration”,Journal of World Investment and Trade, Volume 5, (2004).

Wilson, R., United States Commercial Treaties and International Law, (Hauser Press,1960).

Wena Hotels v. Egypt, Decision on Annulment, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/ (5 February2002).

Weiss, F., “Trade and Investment”, in Muchlinski, Ortino & Schreuer (ed.), TheOxford Handbook of International Investment Law, (Oxford University Press, 2008).

Weiler, Todd, “Saving Oscar Chin: Non-Discrimination in International InvestmentLaw” in Todd Weiler (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: LeadingCases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law,(Cameron May, 2005).

Weiler, T., The Interpretation of International Investment law: Equality,Discrimination, and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical context,204(Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013).

Waste Management v. Mexico, Final Award, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3 (30 April2004).

Wang, H., "WTO Origin Rules for Services and the Defects: Substantial Input Test asOne Way Out?", Journal of World Trade, Vol. 44, No. 5 (2010).

Walker, H., “Modern Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation”, MinnesotaLaw Review, Volume 42, (1957-1958),

WTO, “The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS): objectives, coverageand disciplines”, available athttp://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/gatsqa_e.htm

WTO, “Definition of Services Trade and Modes of Supply”, GATS Training Module,available at http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/cbt_course_e/c1s3p1_e.htm

WTO, “Cancun WTO Ministerial 2003: Briefing Notes, Trade and Investment -From bilaterals to a multilateral agreement?”, available athttps://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min03_e/brief_e/brief07_e.htm

WTO, online: The Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference, available athttp://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min03_e/min03_e.htm

WTO Official Website, “Misunderstandings and scare stories: The GATS andinvestment” available athttp://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/gats_factfiction5_e.htm (last visited onMarch 8, 2014).

WTO Document, WT/L/899.

WTO Decision: WT/L/641. Adoption: WT/GC/M/100, paras. 24?34. Agreedstatements: WT/GC/M/100.

WTO Analytical Index on Anti-dumping Agreement, available athttp://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/analytic_index_e/anti_dumping_02_e.htm

WPGR, Subsidies and Trade in Services, Note by the Secretariat, S/WPGR/W/9, 6March 1996,WTO, “Mode 3-Commercial Presence”, Background Note by the Secretariat,S/C/W/314, 7 April 2010, p. 1.

Vranes, Erich, Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law,WTO Law, and Legal Theory, (Oxford University Press, 2009).

Vndevelede, K, “A Unified Theory of Fair and Equitable Treatment”, New YorkUniversity Journal of International Law and Policy, Volume 43, (2010-2011).

Vivendi v. Argentina Republic, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3 (20 August 2007).

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in 1969.

Vasciannie, S., “The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in InternationalInvestment Law and Practice”, British Yearbook of International Law, (2000).

Van Damme, I., Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body, (Oxford UniversityPress, 2009).

V. ArticlesAbu-Akeel, K., “Definition of trade in services under the GATS: legal implications”,George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, Volume 32, (1999).

United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, Award on the Merits,UNCITRAL, (24 May 2007).

United Nations Statistics Division, Detailed Structure and Explanatory Notes forCPC ver. 2, available athttp://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcs.asp?Cl=25&Lg=1&Co=62

Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes

UNCTAD, “Scope and Definition”, UNCTAD Series on Issues in InternationalInvestment Agreements II, UNCTAD/DIAE/IA/2010/2, (2011).

UNCTAD, “Recent Trends in IIAs and ISDS,” [IIA Issue Note, No. 1, 2015](UNCTAD/WEB/DIAE/PCB/2015/1), February 19, 2015, available athttp://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdiaepcb2015d1_en.pdf

UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2007: Transnational Corporations, ExtractiveIndustries and Development, (United Nations, 2007).

UNCTAD, National Treatment, UNCTAD Series on issues in international investmentagreements, ZUNCTAD/ITE/IIT/11 (Vol. IV), (1999).

UNCTAD, Most-Favoured Nation Treatment, UNCTAD Series on issues ininternational investment agreements II, UNCTAD/DIAE/IA/2010/1, (2010).

UNCTAD, Investment Policy Hub, United Nations (2013), available athttp://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/IIA

UNCTAD, Fair and Equitable Treatment ? UNCTAD Series on Issues inInternational Investment Agreements, (2012).

UNCTAD, Fair and Equitable Treatment ? UNCTAD Series on Issues inInternational Investment Agreements 1, 22 (1999).

UNCTAD, FDI and Development: Policy Issues Related to the Growth of FDI inServices, (UNCTAD: Trade and Development Board, 2003), available athttp://www.unctad.org/en/docs/c2d55_en.pdf

UNCTAD, Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Mid 1990s, (1998).

UNCTAD, Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995-2006: Trends in InvestmentRulemaking, at 22, U.N. Doc. UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/2006/5 (2007), available athttp://www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteiia20065_- en.pdf (last visited Nov. 17, 2008).

UNCTAD, Admission and Establishment, UNCTAD Series on issues in internationalinvestment agreements, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/10 (vol. II), (1999).

UNCTAD and World Bank, “Liberalizing International Transactions in Services”,UNCTAD/DTC1/7 (1994).

UNCTAD IIA University Mapping Project, First and Second edition in 2013-2014,available athttp://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Upload/Documents/UNCTAD%20IIA%20MAPPING%20PROJECT%202013-2014.pdf

Tudor, I., The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law ofForeign Investment, (Oxford University Press, 2008).

Tradex v. Albania, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/94/2 (29 April 1999).

Trade Negotiations Committee (TNC), Draft Final Act Embodying the Results of theUruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, MTN.TNC/W/35-3/Rev.1, 3December 1990.

Trachtman, J., “The Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization”, American Societyof International Law Proceedings (2004).

Total v. Argentina, Decision on Liability, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/01 (27 December2010).

Tokeles v. Ukraine, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18 (29 April2004).

Thunderbird v. Mexico, Award, UNCITRAL, (26 January 2006).

Thosmas, J., “Reflections on Article 1105 of NAFTA: History, State Practice and theInfluence of Commentators”, ICSID Review- Foreign Investment Law Journal,Volume 7, (2002).

Thornberg and Edward, “Failure of Trade liberalization: A Study of the GATSNegotiation”, Journal of International Business and Law, Vol. 10, Issue 2, (2011).

Thomson Reuters Business Classification (TRBC), available athttp://thomsonreuters.com/business-classification/

Third Report on the Law of Treaties, by Sir Humphrey Waldock, Special Rapporteur,Doc. A/CN.4/167 and Add. 1-3, ILC yearbook 1964, II, 5.

The FTC’s “Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions”, issued on 31July 2001.

The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) 1994.

The EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement, October 6, 2010.

Terminal Forest Products Ltd. v. United States, NAFTA/UNICTRAL Tribunal,Notice of Arbitration (31 March 2004).

Tembec, Inc. v. United States, NAFTA/UNICTRAL Tribunal, Notice of Arbitrationand Statement of Claim (3 December 2004).

Tecmed v. Mexico, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/2 (29 May 2003).

TNC, Draft final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of MultilateralTrade Negotiations, MTN.TNC/W/35-3/Rev.1, 3 December 1990, draft Article II.

Subedi, S., International Investment Law: Reconciling Policy and Principle, SecondEdition, Hart (2012).

Steinberg, R., “Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, andPolitical Constraints”, American Journal of International Law, Volume 98, (2004).

Steger, D. P., “The Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization”, American Societyof International Law Proceedings (2004).

Spiermann, “Individual Rights, State Interests and the Power to Waive ICSIDJurisdiction under Bilateral Investment Treaties”, Arbitration International, Volume20, (2004).

Sornarajah, M., The International Law on Foreign Investment, Third Edition,Cambridge University Press (2010).

Societe Ouest Africaine des Betons Industriels (SOABI) v. Senegal, Decision onJurisdiction, ICSID Case No. ARB/82/1 (1 August 1984).

Societe Ouest Africaine des Betons Industriels (SOABI) v. Senegal, Award, ICSIDCase No. ARB/82/1 (25 February 1988).

Sinclair, A., “The Substance of Nationality Requirements in Investment TreatyArbitration”, ICSID Review, Volume 20.2, (2005).

Sinclair, A., “Chapter 5: ICSID’s Nationality Requirements” in Weiler, T., (ed.),Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law, Volume 1, (Juris Publishing,2008).

Siag v. Egypt, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/15 (1 June 2009).

Shaw, M., International Law, the 6th edition, (Cambridge University Press, 2008).

Shaffer and Trachtman, “Interpretation and Institutional Choice at the WTO”, VirginiaJournal of International law, Vol. 52, No. 1, (2011).

Sempra v. Argentina, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16 (28 September 2007).

Schreuer, “Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice”, Journal of WorldInvestment and Trade, Volume 6, (2005).

Schreuer, C., The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, (Cambridge University Press,2001).

Schlemmer, E., “Chapter 2: Investment, Investor, Nationality, and Shareholders”, inMuchlinski, Ortino & Schreuer (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of InternationalInvestment Law, (Oxford University Press, 2008).

Schill, S., “Fair and Equitable Treatment, Rule of Law, and Comparative Public Law”in Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, (OxfordUniversity Press, 2010).

Sauve, Pierre, “Qs and As on Trade, Investment and the WTO”, Journal of WorldTrade, vol. 31 number 4, (August 1997).

Sands, P., and Commission, J., “Treaty, Custom and Time: Interpretation/Application”in Fitzmaurice, M., Elias, O., and Merkouris, P. (ed.), Treaty Interpretation and theVienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On, (Mrtinus Nijhoff Publishers,2010).

Sampson, G., and Snape, R., “Identifying the Issues in Trade in Services”, WorldEconomy, Volume 8, Issue 2, (1985).

Saluka Investments v. Czech Republic, Partial Award, UNCITRAL (17 March 2006).

Salacuse, The Law of Investment Treaties, (Oxford University Press, 2010).

Saipem v. Bangladesh, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/07 (21March 2007).

Sacco, S., and Fernandez-Fonseca, M., “National Treatment in Investment Arbitration”in Huerta-Goldman, Romanetti, and Stirnimann (eds.), WTO Litigation, InvestmentArbitration, and Commercial Arbitration, (Wolters Kluwer, 2013).

S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, Partial Award, UNCTIRAL (13 November2000).

Rompetral v. Romania, Decision on Respondent’s Preliminary Objections onJurisdiction and Admissibility, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/03 (18 April 2008).

Report of the ILC Study Group, Third report of the Study Group on Fragmentation ofInternational Law: Difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion ofinternational law, 28 July 2004 (A/CN.4/L.663/Rev.1, reproduced in Yearbook of theInternational Law Commission, 2004).

Report of the ILC Study Group, Fragmentation of International Law: DifficultiesArising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, (A/CN.4/L.702),18 July 2006.

Report of the ILC Study Group, Fragmentation of International Law: DifficultiesArising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law ? Finalized byMartti Koskenniemi and Draft Conclusions of the Work of the Study Group, Doc. A/CN.4/L.682 and Add. 1 and Corr. 1, 13 April 2006.

Renee Rose Levy and Gremcitel S.A. v. Republic of Peru, Award, ICSID Case No.ARB/11/17 (9 January 2015).

Ramasamy, B., and Yeung, M., “The determinants of foreign direct investment inservices”, The World Economy, Volume 33 Number 4, (2010), pp. 573-596.

Radi, Y., “The Application of the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause to the DisputeSettlement Provisions of Bilateral Investment Treaties: Domesticating the ‘TrojanHorse’”, European Journal of International Law, Volume 18 Issue 4, (2007).

Qureshi, Asif, Interpreting WTO Agreement: Problems and Perspectives, 2nd edition,(Cambridge University Press, 2015).

Qureshi, A., “The FTA Paradigm for the Configuration of World Trade and ForeignInvestment: The Case of Outward Processing Zones”, Journal of World Trade,Volume 48, no. 1, (2014).

Qingjiang, K., “Bilateral Investment Rule-Making: BITs or FTAs with InvestmentRules?”, The Journal of World Investment and Trade, Volume 14, (2013).

Protopsaltis, P., “The Challenge of the Barcelona Traction Hypothesis: BarcelonaTraction Clauses and Denial of Benefits Clauses in BITs and IIAs”, Journal of WorldInvestment and Trade, Vol. 11, (2010).

Presse, Agence France, “Challenge to plain tobacco packaging is crucial test fortrade rules”, the Guardian, 4 May 2014, available athttp://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/04/challenge-australian-tobaccopackaging-critical-test

Potts, J., The Legality of PPMs under the GATT: Challenges and Opportunities forSustainable Trade Policy, (International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2008).

Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, Award on the Merits of Phase 2,UNCITRAL (10 April 2001).

Picciotto, Sol., “Linkages in international investment regulation: the antinomies of thedraft multilateral agreement on investment”, University of Pennsylvania Journal ofInternational Economic Law, Volume 19, (1998).

Petrobart v. Kyrgyz Republic, Award, SCC Case No. 126/2003 (29 March 2005).

Pauwelyn, “A Typology of Multilateral Treaty Obligations: Are WTO ObligationsBilateral or Collective In Nature?”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 14,No. 5, (2003).

Pauwelyn, J., “The Unbearable Lightness of Likeness”, in Panizzon, Pohl, and Sauve(eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services, (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2008).

Pauwelyn, J., “The Nature of WTO Obligations”, Jean Monnet Working Paper, No.1/2002.

Pauwelyn, J., “RIEN NE VA PLUS? Distinguishing Domestic Regulation fromMarket Access in GATT and GATS”, Duke Law School Legal Studies Research PaperSeries, Research Paper No. 85, (October 2005).

Pauwelyn, J., Conflict of Norms in Public International Law-How WTO Law Relatesto Other Rules of International Law, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Pauweln, J., “The Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization”, American Society ofInternational Law, Vol. 98, (MARCH 31-APRIL 3, 2004).

Paulsso, J., Denial of Justice in International Law, (2005).

Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Republic of Lithuania, Award, ICSID Case No.ARB/05/8 (11 September 2007).

Panel report, U.S.-Gambling, (WT/DS285/R), 10 November 2004.

Panel Report, U.S.-Gasoline, (WT/DS2/R), 29 January 1996.

Panel Report, U.S.- Hot-Rolled Steel, (WT/DS184/R), 28 February 2001.

Panel Report, U.S.- Fiber Underwear, (WT/DS24/R), 8 November 1996.

Panel Report, Thailand-Cigarettes (Philippines), (WT/DS371/R), 15 November 2010.

Panel Report, Mexico- Soft Drinks, (WT/DS308/R), March 24, 2006.

Panel Report, Korea-Government Procurement, (WT/DS163/R), 1 May 2000.

Panel Report, Japan-Film, (WT/DS44/R), 31 March 1998.

Panel Report, EC-Trademarks and Geographical Indications, (WT/DS290/R), 15March 2005

Panel Report, EC-Biotech Products, (WT/DS/291,292,293/R), November, 2006.

Panel Report, EC-Bananas III, (WT/DS27/R), 22 May 1997.

Panel Report, Dominican Republic-Import and Sale of Cigarettes, (WT/DS302/R), 26November 2004.

Panel Report, China-Raw Materials, (WT/DS394/R), 5 July 2011.

Panel Report, China-Publications and Audiovisual, (WT/DS363/R), 12 August 2009.

Panel Report, Canada-Automotive Industry, (WT/DS139/R) (WT/DS142/R), 11February 2000.

Panel Report, Argentina-Hides and Leather, (WT/DS155/R), 19 December 2000.

Panel Report for China-Electronic Payment, (WT/DS413/R), 16 July 2012.

Oxford Dictionaries, Compact Oxford English Dictionary, (Oxford University Press,2008), available at http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/ (last visited on August 7,2014).

Olguin v. Paraguay, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5 (26 July 2001).

Oil Platforms case (Iran v. United States), Merits, Judgment of 6 November 2003,2003 ICJ Report 161, reprinted in ILM 42 (2003).

Occidental Exploration & Prod. Co. v. Republic of Ecuador, Final Award,UNCTIRAL (1 July 2004).

OECD, “Chapter 4, The Interaction Between Investment and Services Chapters inSelected Regional Trade Agreements”, International Investment Law: UnderstandingConcepts and Tracking Innovations, OECD (2008).

OECD, “Chapter 1, Definition of Investor and Investment in International InvestmentAgreements”, International Investment Law: Understanding Concepts and TrackingInnovations, OECD (2008).

OECD Notes and Comments to Article 1, 4 (a), (1963).

OECD Factbook 2013: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics, “Foreigndirect investment”, available at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/factbook-2013-en/04/02/01/index.html?itemId=/content/chapter/factbook-2013-34-en (last visitedon March 7, 2014).

O Spiermann, “Individual Rights, State Interests and the Power to Waive ICSIDJurisdiction under Bilateral Investment Treaties”, Arbitration International, Volume20, (2004).

North American Free Trade Agreement.

Nicolaidis and Trachtman, “From Policed Regulation to Managed Recognition inGATS”, in Sauve and Stern (eds.), GATS 2000 ? New Directions in Services TradeLiberalization, (Bookings Institution Press, 2000).

Newcombe and Paradell, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties. Standards ofTreatment, (Kluwer Law International, 2009).

Netherlands-South Africa BIT (1995).

Myeong Hwan Kim, "Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?Revisited", Global Economy Journal, Vol. 11 Issue 2, (2011).

Munin, N., Legal Guide to GATS, (Kluwer Law International: 2010).

Muchlinski, P., Multinational Enterprises and the law, (Oxford University Press,1999).

Mondev v. United States, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2 (11 October 2002).

Molinuevo, M., Protecting Investment in Services: Investor-State Arbitration versusWTO Dispute Settlement, (Wolters Kluwer, 2012).

Mobil v. Venezuela, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/27, (10 June2010).

Mnookin, R., “Strategic Barriers to Dispute Resolution: A Comparison of Bilateraland Multilateral Negotiations”, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Vol. 8, (2003).

Middle East Cement and Handling Co. v. Egypt, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/6(12 April 2002).

Mexico-Italy BIT (1999).

Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Final Award of the Tribunal onJurisdiction and Merits, UNCTRAL, (3 August 2005).

Metaclad Corp. v. Mexico, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (30 August 2000).

Mestral and Falsafi, “Investment Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: A MoreEfficient Solution?”, in Mestral and Levesque (ed.), Improving InternationalInvestment Agreements, (Routledge, 2013).

Merkouris, P., Article 31(3)(c) of the VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration,Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D., Queen Mary University of London Schoolof Law, (2010).

Meeting of the Council for Trade in Services on 3 December 2001, Note by theSecretariat, S/C/M/56.

Meeting of the Council for Trade in Services on 19 March 2002, Note by theSecretariat, S/C/M/59.

McLachlan, Shone, and Weiniger, International Investment Arbitration: SubstantivePrinciples, (Oxford University Press, 2007).

McLachlan, C., “The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31 (3) (c) of theVienna Convention”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 54 (2005).

Mavroidis, “”Like Products”: Some Thoughts at the Positive and Normative Level”,in Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and thePrinciple of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future,(University of Michigan Press, 2000).

Mavroidis, P., The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Commentary, (OxfordUniversity Press, 2005).

Mattoo, Aaditya, “National Treatment in the GATS ? Corner-Stone or Pandora’sBox?”, Journal of World Trade, Volume 31(1), (1997).

Mattoo, Aaditya, “MFN and the GATS”, in Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis(eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World TradeLaw: Past, Present, and Future, (University of Michigan Press, 2000).

Mashaw, Merrill, and Shane, Administrative Law, 4th edition, (West AcademicPublishing, 2001).

Mashaw, J, Due Process in the Administrative State, (Yale University Press 1985).

Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

Maniruzzaman, F.M., “Expropriation of Alien Property and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in International Law of Foreign Investments: An Overview”, Journalof Transnational Law and Policy, Volume 8 Issue 59 (1998-1999).

Magdeleine and Maurer, “Measuring GATS Mode 4 Trade Flows”, WTO StaffWorking Paper, ERSD-2008-05, October 2008, p. 18.

Maffezini v. Spain, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7 (13 November 2000).

MTD v. Republic of Chile, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7 (25 May 2004).

Lowe, A., “Changing Dimensions of International Investment Law” in Shan, Simonsand Singh (eds.), Collected Courses of the Xiamen Academy of International Law,(Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).

Loewen v United States, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3 (26 June 2003).

Lo, C., “A Comparison of BIT and the Investment Chapter of Free Trade Agreementfrom Policy Perspective”, Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law andPolicy, Vol. 3, No. 1, (2008).

Lester, S., “WTO Panel and Appellate Body Interpretations of the WTO Agreementin US Law”, Journal of World Trade, Volume 35, (2001).

Lesher, M. and Miroudot, S., “Analysis of the Economic Impact of InvestmentProvisions in Regional Trade Agreements”, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 36,(OECD Publishing, 2006), available at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/trade/analysisof-the-economic-impact-of-investment-provisions-in-regional-tradeagreements_322248021805, last visited on January 11, 2015.

Lepard, B., Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications,(Cambridge University Press, 2010).

Lennon, C., “Trade in Services: Cross-Border Trade vs. Commercial Presence. Evidence of Complementarity, Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques Working Papers 52, 2008.

Lemire v. Ukraine, Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/18(14 January 2010).

Legal Affairs Division World Trade Organization, WTO Analytical Index 2 VolumeSet: Guide to WTO Law and Practice, The 3rd edition, (Cambridge University Press,2012).

Lebanon-Austria BIT (2001).

Lang, Andrew, “The GATS and Regulatory Autonomy: A Case Study of SocialRegulation of the Water Industry”, Journal of International Economic Law, Volume7, (2004).

Krajewski, “Article VI GATS” and Delimatsis, “Article III GATS” in Wolfrum, P.T.Stoll & Feinaugle (eds), WTO - Trade in Services, Max Planck Commentaries onWorld Trade Law, (Martinus Mijnhoff Publishers, 2008).

Krajewski, M., National Regulation and Trade Liberalization in Services, (KluwerLaw International, 2005).

Krajewski and Engelke, “Article XVII GATS”, Wolfrum, P.T. Stoll & Feinaugle (eds),WTO - Trade in Services, Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, (MartinusMijnhoff Publishers, 2008).

Koulen, M., “Foreign Investment in the WTO”, in Nieuwenhuys and Brus (eds.),Multilateral Regulation of Investment, (Kluwer Law International, 2001).

Klager, R., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment' in International Investment Law,(Cambridge University Press, 2011).

Kinnear, Meg N. et al, Investment Disputes under NAFTA: An Annotated Guide to201NAFTA Chapter 11, (Kluwer Law International, 2006).

Kaufmann-Kohler, G., “Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?”,Arbitration International, Volume 23, (2007).

Jordan’s Contributions towards the Improvement and Clarification of the WTODispute Settlement Understanding? Communication from Jordan, TN/DS/W/43.

Jan de Nul NV and Dredging International NV v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Decisionon Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/13 (16 June 2006).

Jain, Prebble, and Bunting, “Conduit Companies, Beneficial Ownership, and the Testof Substantive Business Activity in Claims for Relief under Double Tax Treaties”,Journal of Tax Research, Volume 11.3, (2013).

Jackson, Davey and Sykes, Legal Problems of International Economic Relations ?Cases, Materials and Text, 5th edition, (Thomson, 2008).

JOB(01)/165, MFN, National Treatment and Like Circumstances, 30 November 2001.

India-Korea Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, August 7, 2009.

Impregilo v. Pakistan, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/3 (22 April2005).

Iida, L., and Nielson, J., “Transparency in Domestic Regulation: Practices andPossibilities”, In Mattoo, A., and Sauve, P. (ed.), Domestic Regulation and ServiceTrade Liberalization, (Oxford University Press, 2003).

Idoringie, P., Investment Treaty Arbitration and Emerging Markets: Issues, Prospectsand Challenges, (Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, 2011).

ILC, Report of the International Law Commission (58th Session, 1 May-9 June and 3July-11 August 2006) (A/61/10).

ICJ, Case Concerning Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana/Namibia), ICJ Reports(1999).

Hudec, Robert E., ““Like Products”: The Differences in Meaning in GATT Articles Iand III”, in Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers andthe Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future,(University of Michigan Press, 2000).

Houde, Kolse-Patil and Miroudot, The Interaction between Investment and ServicesChapters in Selected Regional Trade Agreements, No. 55. (OECD Publishing, 2007).

Higgins, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use it, (OxfordUniversity Press, 1994).

Hebert, J., “Issues of Corporate Nationality in Investment Arbitration”, in Mestral andLevesque (ed.), Improving International Investment Agreements, (Routledge, 2013).

Hamilton and Rochwerger, “Trade and Investment: Foreign Direct Investmentthrough Bilateral and Multilateral Treaties”, New York International Law Review, Vol.18, No. 1, (2005).

Group of Negotiations on Services (GNS), Report to the Trade NegotiationsCommittee meeting at Ministerial level, Montreal, December 1988, MTN.GNS/21.

Group of Negotiations on Services (GNS), Report to the Trade NegotiationsCommittee meeting at Ministerial level, Montreal, December 1988, MTN.GNS/21,25 November 1988.

Golub, S., “Openness to foreign direct investment in services: an internationalcomparative analysis”, The World Economy, Volume 32 Number 8, (2009).

Goldsmith, J., and Posner, E., “A Theory of Customary International Law”, Universityof Chicago Law School, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper 63 (1998).

German 2008 model BIT.

Genin v. Estonia, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2 (25 June 2001).

General Agreement on Trade In Services

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994.

Gazzini, “Can Authoritative Interpretation under Article IX:2 of the AgreementEstablishing the WTO Modify the Rights and Obligations of Members?”, TheInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 1 (Jan., 2008).

GNS, Services Sectoral Classification List, Note by the Secretariat,MTN.GNS/W/120, 10 July 1991.

GNS, Report to the Trade Negotiations Committee meeting at Ministerial level,Montreal, December 1988, MTN.GNS/21, 25 November 1988.

GNS, Draft-Multilateral Framework for Trade in Services, MTN.GNS/35, 23 July1990.

GATT Panel Report, EEC-Dessert Apples, BISD/36s/93.

GATT Panel Report, EEC-Apples (US), BISD/36S/135.

GAMI Investments Inc. v. Mexico, Award, UNCITRAL,(15 November 2004).

Free Trade Agreement between the Republic of Korea and Canada, September 23,2014.

Free Trade Agreement between the Republic of Korea and Australia, April 8, 2014.

Free Trade Agreement between the People’s Republic of China and the Governmentof the Republic of Peru, April 28, 2009.

Franck Charles Arif v. Republic of Moldova, Award, ICSID No. (ARB/11/23) (8 April2013).

Foy and Deane, “Foreign Investment Protection under Investment Treaties: recentDevelopments under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement”,ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, Volume 16, (2001).

Footer, M., “On the Laws of Attraction: Examining the Relationship between ForeignInvestment and International Trade”, in Echandi and Sauve (ed.), Prospects inInternational Investment Law and Policy, (Cambridge University Press, 2013).

Fitzmaurice, M., and Merkouris, P., “Canons of Treaty Interpretation: Selected CaseStudies from the World Trade Organization and the North American Free TradeAgreement” in Fitzmaurice, M., Elias, O., and Merkouris, P. (ed.), TreatyInterpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On,(Mrtinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010).

Feldman, M., “Setting Limits on Corporate Nationality Planning in Investment TreatyArbitration”, ICSID Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, (2012).

Feldman v. Mexico, Interim Decision on Preliminary Jurisdictional Issues, ICSIDCase No. ARB(AF)/99/1 (6 December 2000).

Feldman v. Mexico, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1 (16 December 2002).

Feinaugle, “Article XXVIII GATS”, in Wolfrum, P.T. Stoll & Feinaugle (eds), WTO -Trade in Services, Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, (MartinusMijnhoff Publishers, 2008).

Falsafi, A., “Regional Trade and Investment Agreements: Liberalizing Investment ina Preferential Climate”, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce,Volume 36, (2008-2009).

El Paso v. Argentina, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/15 (31 October 2011).

Ehlermann and Ehring, “The Authoritative Interpretation Under Article IX:2 of theAgreement Establishing the World Trade Organization: Current Law, Practice andPossible Improvements”, Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 8(4),(2005).

Egger, p., and Lanz, R., “The Determinants of GATS Commitment Coverage”, TheWorld Economy, (2008).

Draft Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral TradeNegotiations, MTN.GNS/W/35/Rev.1, 3 December 1990.

Dolzer, R., Perspectives for Investment Arbitration: Consistency as a Policy Goal?,Transnational Dispute Management (2012).

Dolzer, R. & Schreuer, C., Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd Ed.,(Oxford University Press, 2012).

Dolzer R. and Stevens, M., Bilateral Investment Treaties, (Martinus Nijhoff, 1995).

Diebold, Nicolas F., Non-Discrimination in International Trade in Services: ‘Likeness’in WTO/GATS, (Cambridge University Press, 2010).

DiMascio, N., and Pauwelyn, J., “Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties:Worlds Apart or Two sides of the Same Coin?”, American Journal of InternationalLaw, Volume 48, Issue 402, (2008).

Delimatsis, “Due Process and Good Regulation Embedded in the GATS”, Journal ofInternational Economic Law, Volume 10 (2007).

Delimatsis, P., “The Interaction Between GATS Articles VI, XVI, XVII and XVIIIafter the US ? Gambling Case”, NCCR TRADE WORKING PAPERS, Working PaperNo 2006/9, June 2006.

Delimatsis, P., International Trade in Services and Domestic Regulations: Necessity,Transparency, and Regulatory Diversity, (Oxford University Press, 2007).

Deardorff and Stern, “Empirical Analysis of Barriers to International ServicesTransactions and the Consequences of Liberalization”, in Mattoo, Stern and Zanini(eds.), A Handbook of International Trade in Services, (Oxford University Press,2008).

Davey, W. J., “The WTO Dispute Settlement System: The First Ten Years”, Volume8 (1), Journal of International Economic Law, (2005).

Davey and Pauwelyn, “MFN Unconditionality: A Legal Analysis of the Concept inView of its Evolution in the GATT/WTO Jurisprudence with Particular Reference tothe Issue of “Like Product”” in Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.),Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law:Past, Present, and Future, (University of Michigan Press, 2000).

Czech Slovakia-Switzerland BIT (1990)Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the Republic of Panama, May 14, 2010.

Curtiss, “Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures: A Five-Year Review”,Comparative Law Yearbook of International Business, (2003).

Council for Trade in Services, Guidelines for Notifications under the GeneralAgreement on Trade in Services, Adopted by the Council for Trade in Services on 1March 1995, S/L/5, 4 April 1995.

Cottier and Molinuevo, “Article V GATS” in Wolfrum, P.T. Stoll & Feinaugle (eds),WTO - Trade in Services, Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, (MartinusMijnhoff Publishers, 2008).

Cossy, Mireille, “Determining “Likeness” under the GATS: Squaring the circle?”,World Trade Organization Economic Research and Statistics Division, Staff WorkingPaper ERSD-2006-08, September 2006.

Corn Products v. Mexico, Decision on Responsibility, ICSID Additional Facility,Case No. ARB(AF)/04/01, (15 January 2008).

Corn Products International Inc. v. The United Mexican States, Decision onResponsibility, ICSID Additional Facility, Case No. ARB(AF)/04/01, (15 January2008).

Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationalsof Other States - International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 1965.

Consorzio Groupement LESI ? Dipenta v. Republique Algerienne, Award, (10 January2005).

Collins, D., “National Treatment in Emerging Market Investment Treaties”, inSanders, A. (ed.), The Principle of National Treatment in International Economic Law:Trade, Investment and Intellectual Property, (Edward Elgar, 2014).

Choukroune, L, “National Treatment in International Investment Law and Arbitration:A Relative Standard for Autonomous Public Regulation and Sovereign Development”,in Sanders, A. (ed.), The Principle of National Treatment in International EconomicLaw: Trade, Investment and Intellectual Property, (Edward Elgar, 2014).

Choi, Won-Mog, ‘Like Products’ in International Trade Law ? Towards a ConsistentGATT/WTO Jurisprudence, (Oxford University Press, 2003).

Charnovitz, S., “What is International Economic Law?” Journal of InternationalEconomic Law, Volume 14 Issue 1, (2011).

Chanda, R., “Inter-modal Linkages in Services Trade”, OECD Trade Policy Papers,No. 30, (OECD Publishing, 2006).

Champion Trading v. Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/9 (21October 2003).

Champion Trading v. Egypt, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/9 (27 October 2006).

Cassese, A., International Law, 2nd edition, (Oxford University Press, 2005).

Carmody, C., “WTO Obligations as Collective,” European Journal of InternationalLaw, Vol. 17, No. 2, (2006).

Cargill, Incorporated v United Mexican States, Award, ICSID Case No.ARB(AF)/05/2 (18 September 2009).

Canfor Corp. v. United States, NAFTA/UNICTRAL Tribunal, Notice of Arbitrationand Statement of Claim (July 9, 2002), available athttp://www.state.gov/documents/organization/13203.pdf.

Canada-Jordan BIT (2009).

CMS Gas Transmission Co v. Argentina, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No.ARB/01/8 (17 July 2003).

CIEL , International Law on Investment: the Minimum Standard of Treatment (MST),(Center for International Environmental Law Issue Brief, August 2003), p.1, availableat http://www.ciel.org/Publications/investment_10Nov03.pdf

Burt, E., “Developing Countries and the Framework for Negotiations on ForeignDirect Investment in the World Trade Organization.”, American University Journalof International Law and Policy, Volume 12 (1997).

Broude, “Investment and Trade: the ‘Lottie and Lisa’ of International EconomicLaw?”, in Echandi and Sauve (ed.), Prospects in International Investment Law andPolicy, (Cambridge University Press, 2013).

Bronckers and McNelis, “Rethinking the “Like Product” Definition in GATT 1994:Anti-Dumping and Environmental Protection”, in Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination inWorld Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future, (University of Michigan Press, 2000).

Bossche and Zdouc, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 3rd edition,(Cambridge University Press, 2013).

Border Tax Adjustments, Report of the Working Party adopted 2 December 1970,BISD/18.

Biwater Gauff v. Tanzania, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22 (24 July 2008).;

Azurix v. Argentina, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12 (14 July 2006).

Autopista v. Venezuela, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID CASE NO. ARB/00/5 (27September 2001).

Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department, “Tobacco plainpackaging?investor-state arbitration”, available athttp://www.ag.gov.au/tobaccoplainpackaging

Appellate Body Report, U.S.-Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations”,(WT/DS108/AB/R), 24 February 2000.

Appellate Body Report, U.S.-Shrimp, (WT/DS/58/AB/R), 6 November 1998.

Appellate Body Report, U.S.-Gasoline, (WT/DS2/AB/R), 29 April 1996.

Appellate Body Report, U.S.-Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000,(WT/DS217/AB/R, WT/DS234/AB/R), January 16 2003.

Appellate Body Report, U.S.-Clove Cigarettes, (WT/DS406/AB/R), 4 April 2012.

Appellate Body Report, U.S.- Fiber Underwear, (WT/DS24/AB/R), 10 February1997.

Appellate Body Report, Korea-Various Measures on Beef, (WT/DS121/AB/R), 11188December 2000.

Appellate Body Report, Japan-Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, (WT/DS8,10,11/AB/R),1 November 1996.

Appellate Body Report, EC-Selected Customs Matters, (WT/DS315/AB/R), 13November 2006.

Appellate Body Report, EC-Computer Equipment, (WT/DS62, 67, 68/AB/R), 22 June1998.

Appellate Body Report, EC-Civil Aircraft, (WT/DS316/AB/R), 1 June 2011.

Appellate Body Report, EC-Chicken Cuts, (WT/DS269/AB/R), 27 September 2005.

Appellate Body Report, EC-Bananas III, (WT/DS27/AB/R), 9 September 1997.

Appellate Body Report, Canada-Automotive Industry, (WT/DS139/AB/R)(WT/DS142/AB/R), 19 June 2000.

Appellate Body Report, Brazil-Desiccated Coconut, (WT/DS22/AB/R), 21 February,1997.

Appellate Body Report, Argentina-Footwear (EC), (WT/DS121/AB/R), 14 December1999.

Apotex Holdings Inc. and Apotex Inc. v. United States of America, Award, ICSIDCase No. ARB(AF)/12/1 (25 August 2014).

Amco Asia Corporation and Others v. Republic of Indonesia, First Award, ICSIDCase No. ARB/81/1 (20 November 1984).

Altinger, L., and Enders, A., “The scope and depth of GATS commitments”, TheWorld Economy, Volume 19, (1996).

Alps Finance and Trade AG v. Slovak Republic, Award, UNCITRAL (5 March 2011).

Alford, Roger P., “The Convergence of International Trade and InvestmentArbitration”, Santa Clara Journal of International Law, Volume 12 Issue 1Symposium on the Law and Politics of Foreign Investment, January 17, (2014).

Alexander, K., and Andenas, M., The World Trade Organization and Trade in Services,Koninklijke Brill NV (2008).

Aguas del Tunari v. Bolivia, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/3 (21October, 2005).

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the People'sRepublic of China for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, (2012)

Adlung, Morrision, Roy and Zang, “FOG in GATS Commitments: Boon or Bane”,World Trade Organization: Staff Working Paper, ERSD-2011-04, March 2011.

Acconci, P., “Determining the Internationally Relevant Link between a State and aCorporate Investor”, Journal of World Investment and Trade, Volume 5, (2004).

Abu-Akeel, “The MFN as it Applies to Service Trade ? New Problems for an OldConcept”, Journal of World Trade, Volume 33(4), (1999).

Abi-Saab, G., “The Appellate Body and Treaty Interpretation” in Fitzmaurice, M.,Elias, O., and Merkouris, P. (ed.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention onthe Law of Treaties: 30 Years On, (Mrtinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010).

AMTO v. Ukraine, Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce,Award, Arbitration No. 080/2005 (26 March 2008).

ADF Grp., v. United States, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/1 (9 January2003).

ADC Affiliate Ltd. And ADC & ADMC Management Ltd v. The Republic of Hungary,Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/16 (2 October 2006).

196The Nottebohm case (Lichtenstein v. Guatemala), 4 ICJ Report, (1955).

Prospective contribution of international investment law to the interpretation of GATS

유사주제 논문( 39)

' Prospective contribution of international investment law to the interpretation of GATS' 의 주제별 논문영향력

주제별 논문영향력

' Prospective contribution of international investment law to the interpretation of GATS' 의 참고문헌

' Prospective contribution of international investment law to the interpretation of GATS' 의 유사주제( ) 논문