연구동향 분석
박사

Effect of interest on the perception of effort cost and academic engagement

송주연 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' Effect of interest on the perception of effort cost and academic engagement' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • academic engagement
  • effort cost
  • interest
  • task value
  • utility
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
355 0

0.0%

' Effect of interest on the perception of effort cost and academic engagement' 의 참고문헌

  • http:dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9287-x.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000003.
  • Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In K. R.Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds), Handbook of motivation in school (pp.55?76).New York: Routledge Taylor Francis Group.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The Development of Achievement Task Values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2002). The development of competence beliefs,expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood throughadolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development ofachievement motivation (pp. 91?120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
  • Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective andprospective. In: S. Karabenick & T. Urdan (Eds.), The decade ahead:theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (Advances inmotivation and achievement, Vol. 16, pp.35?70). Bingley, UK: EmeraldGroup Publishing Limited.
  • Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-Value Theory of achievementmotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
  • Westbrook, A., Kester, D., & Braver, T. S. (2013). What is the subjective cost ofcognitive effort? Load, trait, and aging effects revealed by economicpreference. PLoS ONE, 8, e68210.
  • Walton, M. E., Kenneriey, S. W., Bannerman, D. M., Phillips, P. E. M., &Rushworth, M. F. S. (2006). Weighing up the benefits of work: Behavioraland neural analyses of effort-related decision making. Neural Networks, 19,1302?1314.
  • Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification withacademics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors ofcognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1?12.
  • Vassena, E., Silvetti, M., Boehler, C. N., Achten, E., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2014).Overlapping neural systems represent cognitive effort and rewardanticipation. PLoS ONE, 9, e91008.
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., Matos, L., & Lacante, M.(2004). Less is sometimes more: Goal content matters. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 96, 755?764.
  • Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Ludtke, O., Magy, G., Jonkmann, K.(2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-valuetheory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 104, 763?777.
  • Thoman, D. B., Smith, J. L., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). The resource replenishmentfunction of interest. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 2, 592?599.
  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245?252.
  • Song, J., Woo., Y., Reeve, J., Bong, M., & Ahn, J. H. (2014, April). The role ofdifferent forms of cognitive engagement as a mediator between motivationand achievement. Paper session presented at the annual meeting of theAmerican Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Song, J., Kim, S., & Bong, M. (2012, April). Antecedents and consequents ofacademic goal-construal. Paper session presented at the annual meeting ofthe American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Skinner, E., Zimmer-Gembeck, M., & Connell, J. (1998). Individual differencesand the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society forResearch in Child Development, 63(2?3, Serial No. 254).
  • Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivationalperspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization andassessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academicactivities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement,69, 493?525.
  • Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and sciencemotivation: A longitudinal examination of links between choices and beliefs.Developmental Psychology, 42, 70 ? 83.
  • Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types ofinstrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Knowwhat you learn, so you’ll know what you learn! British Journal ofEducational Psychology, 74, 343?360.
  • Silvia, P. J. (2001). Interest and interests: The psychology of constructivecapriciousness. Review of General Psychology, 5, 270?290.
  • Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences (3rdEdition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Schiefele, U., & Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor ofacademic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S.Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development(pp. 183?212). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Schiefele, U. (1998). Individual interest and learning, what we know and what wedon’t know. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.),Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest andgender (pp. 91?104). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychology,26, 299?323.
  • Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10, 175-186.
  • Salamone, J. D., Correa, M., Farrar, A., & Mingote S. M. (2007). Effort-relatedfunctions of nuclues accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits.Psychopharmacology, 191, 461?482.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classicdefinitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25,54?67.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitationof intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. AmericanPsychologist, 55, 68?78.
  • Rushworth MF, Behrens TE, Rudebeck PH, Walton ME (2007) Contrasting rolesfor cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11,168 ?176.
  • Renninger, K. A., Ewen, L., & Lasher, A. K. (2002). Individual interest as contextin expository text and mathematical word problems. Learning andInstruction, 12, 467?491.
  • Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement:Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles(Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173?195). New York:Academic.
  • Reeve, J., Lee, W., & Won, S. (2015). Interest as emotion, as affect, as schema. InK. A. Renninger & M. Nieswandt (Eds.), Interest in mathematics andscience learning. Washington, DC: American Educational ResearchAssociation.
  • Raykov, T. (2004). Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invarianceevaluation using latent variable modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35, 299?331.
  • Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures.Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173?184.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S, Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, Jr. R. T, & du Toit, M.(2011). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling [Computersoftware]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., Senecal, C. (2007).Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: Aperson-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734?745.
  • Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & Montague, P. R. (2008). A framework for studying theneurobiology of value-based decision making. Nature ReviewsNeuroscience, 9, 545?556.
  • Prenzel, M. (1992). The selective persistence of interest. In K. A. Renninger, S.Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development(pp. 71?98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Peters, J., & Buchel, C. (2011). The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decisionmaking:understanding variability. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 227?239.
  • Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development,values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 106, 315?329.
  • Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Beiere, N. M. (2002).Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation,and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279?306.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. (2002). Academic emotions in students’self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative andquantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91?105.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2004).Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: TheAchievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary EducationalPsychology, 36, 36 ?48.
  • Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towardsa theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychologie: AnInternational Review, 41, 359?376.
  • O’Keefe, P. A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The role of interest in optimizingperformance and self-regulation. Journal of Experimental SocialPsychology, 53, 70?78.
  • Newmann, F., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance andsources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagementand achievement in American secondary schools (pp.11?39). New York:Teachers College Press.
  • Navon, D. (2013). Effort aversiveness may be functional, but does it reflectopportunity cost? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 701?702.
  • Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivationterminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3?53.
  • Moore, A., & Gullone, E. (1996). Predicting adolescent risk behavior using apersonalized cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25,343?359.
  • Molden, D. C., Hui, C. M., Scholer, A. A., Meier, B. P., Noreen, E. E., D’Agostino,P. R. & Martin, V. (2012) Motivational versus metabolic effects ofcarbohydrates on self-control. Psychological Science 23, 1137?44.
  • Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondaryschool mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85,424?436.
  • Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences inperceived competene and autonomy in above-average children. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 88, 203?214.
  • Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of mathanxiety and its consequences for young adolescents’ courseenrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 82, 60-70.
  • McNeish, D. M. & Stapleton, L. M. (2014, October 19). The effect of small samplesize on two-level model estimates: A review and illustration. EducationalPsychology Review. Advance online publication.
  • McGuire, J. T. & Botvinick, M. M. (2010) Prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, andthe registration of decision costs. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences USA, 107,7922?7926.
  • McDaniel, M. A., Waddill, P. J., Finstad, K., & Bourg, T. (2000). The effects oftext-based interest on attention and recall. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 92, 492?502.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4),226?232.
  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Koller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005).Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores:Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397?416.
  • Lipstein, R., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). “Putting things into words”:12?15-yearoldstudents’ interest for writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) and P.Boscolo & S. Hidi (Volume Eds.), Studies in writing, volume 19, writingand motivation (pp. 113?140). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2004). Role of affect in cognitive processingin academic settings. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation,emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioningand development (pp. 57?87). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lens, W. (2001). How to combine intrinsic task-motivation with the motivationaleffects of the instrumentality of present task for future goals. In A. Efklides,J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivationresearch (pp. 23?36). Dortrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Lee, W., Lee, M., & Bong, M. (2014). Testing interest and self-efficacy aspredictors of academic self-regulation and achievement. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 39, 86?99.
  • Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: Thecase of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125-141.
  • Lee, J., Bong, M., & Kim, S. (2014). Interaction between task values and selfefficacyon maladaptive achievement strategy use. Educational Psychology,34, 538?560.
  • Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., Myers, J. (2013). An opportunity costmodel of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and BrainSciences, 36, 661?726.
  • Kurniawan, I. T., Guitart-Masip, M., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). Dopamine and effortbaseddecision making. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, 81.
  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.
  • Krapp, A., & Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning anddevelopment. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role ofinterest in learning and development (pp. 3?25). New Jersey: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.
  • Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B. & Botvinick, M. M. (2010) Decisionmaking and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: General, 139(4), 665?82.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NewYork, NY: Guilford.
  • Kim, S., Jiang, Y. K., & Song, J. (2015). The effects of interest and utility value onmathematics engagement and achievement. In K. A. Renninger & M. Nieswandt (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning.Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Kim, S. (2013). Neuroscientific model of motivational process. Frontiers inPsychology, 4, 98.
  • Jiang, Y., Hwang, A., Bong, M., & Kim, S. (2012, April). Examining different rolesof situational and individual interest in an integrated model. Paper sessionpresented at the annual meeting of the American Educational ResearchAssociation, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Izard, C. E., & Ackerman, B. P. (2000). Motivational, organizational, andregulatory functions of discrete emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 253?264). New York:Guilford.
  • Isen, A. M., & Reeve, J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic andextrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible workbehavior, and self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 297?325.
  • Husman, J., Derryberry, W. P., Crowson, H. M., &Lomax, R. (2004).Instrumentality, task value, and intrinsic motivation: Making sense of theirindependent interdependence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29,63?76.
  • Husman, J., & Lens, W. (2010). The role of the future in student motivation.Educational Psychologist, 34, 113?125.
  • Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010).Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention.Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 880?895.
  • Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008).Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398?416.
  • Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support,effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 1?14.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structureanalysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural EquationModeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
  • Higgins, E. T. (2007). Value. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Socialpsychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 454?472). New York:Guilford Press.
  • Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement.Psychological Review, 113, 439-460.
  • Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variablethat combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrativeperspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp.89?115). NewJersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development.Educational Psychologist, 41, 111?127.
  • Hidi, S., & Ainley, M. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships betweentwo variables that influence learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman(Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, andapplication (pp. 78?109). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hidi, S. (1995). A re-examination of the role of attention in learning from text.Educational Psychology Review, 7, 323?350.
  • Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning.Review of Educational Research, 60, 549?571.
  • Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials andAdvances. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004).Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement:Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 29, 462?482.
  • Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceivedability, cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21,181?192.
  • Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world.Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576.
  • Grabenhost, F., & Rolls, E. T. (2011). Value, pleasure and choice in the ventralprefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 56?67.
  • Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Schreier, B., Hafner, I., Trautwein, U., &Nagengast, B. (2014, October 27). More value through greaterdifferentiation: Gender differences in value beliefs about math. Journal ofEducational Psychology. Advance online publication.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement:Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of EducationalResearch, 74, 59?109.
  • Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., & Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E.(2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-valuetheory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232?244.
  • Federici, R. A., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2014). Students’ perception of instrumentalsupport and effort in mathematics: The mediating role of subjective task.Social Psychology of Education, 17, 527?540.
  • Feather, N. T. (1988). Values, valences, and course enrollment: Testing the role ofpersonal values within expectancy-value framework. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 80, 384?391.
  • Ernst, M., & Fuge, J. L. (2009). A developmental neurobiological model ofmotivated behavior: Anatomy, connectivity and ontogeny of the triadicnodes. Neuroscience and Behavioral Review, 33, 367?382.
  • Eccles, J. S., Vida, M. N., & Barber, B. (2004) The relation of early adolescents’college plans and both academic ability and task-value beliefs to subsequentcollege enrollment. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 63?77.
  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., & Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: Atest of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46,26?41.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational belief, values, and goals. AnnualReview of Psychology, 53, 109?132.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure ofadolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215?225.
  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model ofachievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.),Handbook of competence and motivation (pp.105?121). New York:Guilford Press.
  • Eccles, J. S. (1984). Sex differences in mathematics participants. In M. Steinkamp& M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol.2, pp.93?137) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Eccles, (Parsons) J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece,J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors.In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motivation (pp. 75?146). San Francisco: Freeman.
  • Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs aspredictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382?393.
  • Durik, A. M., Shechter, O. G., Noh, M., Rozek, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M.(2015). What if I can’t? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utilityvalue information on situational interest and performance. Motivation andEmotion, 39, 104?118.
  • Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation andemotion: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychology, 26,325?346.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 11, 227-268.
  • Croxson, P. L., Walton, M. E., O’Reilly, J. X., Behrens, T. E. J., & Rushworth, M. F.S. (2009). Effort-based cost-benefit valuation and the human brain. Journalof Neuroscience, 29, 4531?4541.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Conley, A. M. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: Combining achievement goaland expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104,32?47.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Chouinard, R., Karsenti, T., & Roy, N. (2007). Relations among competence beliefs,utility value, achievement goals, and effort in mathematics. British Journalof Educational Psychology, 77, 510?517.
  • Chiang, E. S., Byrd, S. P., Molin, A. J. (2011). Children’s perceived cost forexercise: Application of an expectancy-value paradigm. Health Education& Behaviour, 38, 143?149.
  • Canning, E. A., Priniski, S. J., Tibbetts, Y., & Harackiewicz, J. (2015, April).Relevance interventions: Clarifying type and timing. Symposium sessionpresented at the annual meeting of the American Educational ResearchAssociation, Chicago, IL.
  • Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D’Alessandro, D. U., & Koestner, R. (2006). Thedifferential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being andperformance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to selfdeterminationtheory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91,750?762.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R.(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Botvinick, M., Huffstetler, A., & McGuire, J. T. (2009). Effort discounting inhuman nucleus accumbens. Cognitive, Affect, & Behavioral Neuroscience,9, 16?27.
  • Bong, M., Kim, S., Reeve, J., Lim, H. J., Lee, W., Ahn, …Woo, Y. (2012). TheStudent Motivation in the Learning Environment Scales (SMILES). Unpublished instrument. Retrieved from Korea University, Brain andMotivation Research Institute website:http://bmri.korea.ac.kr/english/research/assessment_scales/list.html?id=assessment
  • Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task-value in predicting college students’course performance and future enrolment intentions. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 26, 553?570.
  • Boksem, M. A. S. & Tops, M. (2008) Mental fatigue: Costs and benefits. BrainResearch Reviews, 59, 125?39.
  • Berlyne,D.E.(1978).Curiosityandlearning.MotivationandEmotion.2,97-175.
  • Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist,34, 87?98.
  • Bentler, P. M. (2009). Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistencyreliability. Psychometrika, 74, 137?143.
  • Battle, E. (1965). Motivational determinants of academic task persistence. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 209?218.
  • Battle, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). College women’s value orientations towardfamily, career, and graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 56?75.
  • Barron, K.E., & Hulleman, C.S. (2015). The expectancy-value-cost model ofmotivation. In J.D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the socialand behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
  • Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for readingand their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. ReadingResearch Quarterly, 34, 452?477.
  • Atkinson, J. W. (1966). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. In J. W.Atkinson & N. T. Feather, A theory of achievement motivation (pp.11?31).New York: Wiley.
  • Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ : VanNostrand.
  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior.Psychology Review, 64, 359?372.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (1995). AMOS 16.0 user’s guide. Chicago: SPSS.
  • Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., & Parker, D. (1997).College instruction and concomitant changes in students’ knowledge,interest, and strategy use: A study of domain learning. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 22, 125?146.
  • Alexander, K. L., Entriwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1993). First-grade classroombehavior: Its short- and long-term consequences for school performance.Child Development, 64, 801?814.
  • Albin, M. L., Benton, S. L., & Khramtsova, I. (1996). Individual differences ininterest and narrative writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21,305?324.
  • Ainley,M. (1998). Interest in learning and the disposition of curiosity in secondarystudents: Investigating process and context. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A.Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of theSeeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 257?266). Kiel, Germany:IPN.
  • Ainley, M., Hillman, K., Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in responseto literary texts: situational and individual interest. Learning and instruction,12, 411?428.
  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S., Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychologicalprocesses that mediate their relationship. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 94, 545?561.
  • Ainley, M. (2012). Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activity. In S. L.Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research onstudent engagement (pp. 283?302). New York, NY: Springer.