연구동향 분석
박사

의료용 디지털 엑스선 장치에서 니켈 부가여과판의 유용성 평가에 관한 연구 = A Study on Evaluation of Usefulness of Nickel Additional Filter in the Medical Digital X-ray equipment

김상현 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 의료용 디지털 엑스선 장치에서 니켈 부가여과판의 유용성 평가에 관한 연구 = A Study on Evaluation of Usefulness of Nickel Additional Filter in the Medical Digital X-ray equipment' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 구리
  • 니켈
  • 부가여과판
  • 선량
  • 선질
  • 화질
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
162 0

0.0%

' 의료용 디지털 엑스선 장치에서 니켈 부가여과판의 유용성 평가에 관한 연구 = A Study on Evaluation of Usefulness of Nickel Additional Filter in the Medical Digital X-ray equipment' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국의료영상품질관리원
    유방촬영 시 환자피폭선량 진단 참고준위확립 [2006]
  • 진료방사선물리학
    김창균 대학서림 [1998]
  • 진단방사선원리
    박수성 대학서림 [1985]
  • 식품의약품안전처
    영상의학 검사(일반촬영)에서의 표준 촬영기법 [2014]
  • 식품의약품안전처
    진단용 방사선 발생 부적합장치의 적정관리 방안연구 [2013]
  • Zaidi H, Relevance of accurate monte carlo modeling in nuclearmedicine imaging, 1999, 26:574-608.
  • Zaidi H, Quantitative SPECT: Recent development in detectorresponse attenuation and scatter correction techniques, Phys. Medica,1996, 12:101-117.
  • Yong-Keun Song, Diagnostic radiation imaging detectorimplementation and image evaluation using monte carlo simulation,Gimhae, Korea, Inje University, 2013.
  • Workman A, Cowen AR, Signal-Noise and SNR transferproperties of computed radiography, Phys. Med. Biol, 1993,38:1789-1808.
  • Wilkinson LE, Johnston PN, Heggie JCP, A comparison ofmammography spectral measurement with spectra produced usingseveral different mathmatical models, Phys. Med. Biol, 2001,46(5):1575-1589.
  • W. K. Pratt, Digital image science, Academic, New York, 1991.
  • Villagran JE, Hobb BB, Taylor KW, Reduction of patient exposureby use of heavy elements of radiation filters in diagnostic radiology,Radiology, 1978, 127:249-254.
  • Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, The EGS4 Code System,SLAC Report-256, 1985.
  • Soon-Il Hong, Development of dental digital radiographic systemusing CMOS and evaluation of imaging properties, Seoul, Korea,Yonsei University, 2003.
  • Smith MA, Sutton D, Tothill P, Comparison between 153Gd and241AM, 137CS for dual-phantom absorptiometry of the spine, Phys. Med. Biology, 1983, 28(6):709-721.
  • Shin GS, Choi JH, Kim YH, Kim JM, Kim CG, Patient dose inmammography, Journal of radiological science and technology, 2005,28(4):29.-299.
  • Seung-Kon Han, Study on the DQE measurement survey and theevaluation program of the x-ray detector, Korea, Korea PolytechnicUniversity, 2013.
  • Seong-Kil Lee, A Study on the improvement of the outputcharacteristics for inverter type x-ray generator, Gwangju, Korea,University of Chosun, 2000.
  • Sang-Tae Kim, A Study on the distribution of absorbed doseinside the human body by primary ray at the time of fluoroscopythrough Geant4 and DICOM interface, Jeonju, Korea, ChonbukNational University, 2012.
  • Samei E, Flynn MJ, Reimann DA, A method for measuring thepresampled MTF of digital radiography systems using an edge testdevice, Med. Phys, 1998, 25:102-113.
  • Samei E, Flynn MJ, An experimental comparison of detectorperformance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems, MedPhy, 2003, 30(4):608-622.
  • S. Yang, J. B. Han, N. G. Choi, S. G. Lee, The Review ofExposure Index in Digital Radiography and Image Quality, Jounrnal ofRadiation Protection, 2013, 38(1):29-36.
  • S. J. Moon, Y. K. Kim, S. K. Lee, Reduction of Patient DoseExposure and Improvement of Image Quality by Use of AdditionalFiltration in Digital Radiology, Korean J Digit Imaging Med, 2010,19-25.
  • S. I. Shin, C. Y. Kim, S. C. Kim, The Study on the Reduction ofPatient Surface Dose Through the use of Copper Filter in a DigitalChest Radiation, Journal of radiological science and technology, 2008,31(3):223-228.
  • Rosenthal MS, Cullom J, Hawkin W, Moore SC, Tsui BM, YesterM, Quantitative SPECT imaging: a review and recommendations byfocus committee of the society of nuclear medicine computer andinstrumentation council, J. Nucl. Med, 1995, 36:1489-1513.
  • Rodriques, Pedro, Moura, Rui, Ortigao, et al, Geant4 applicationsand developments for medical physics experiments, IEEETransactions on Nuclear Science, 2004, 51(4):1412-1419.
  • Richard R. Carlton and Arlen M. Adler, Principles of RadiographicImaging, 4th, Thomson, 2006.
  • Raymond P. Rossi, Reduction of Radiation Exposure inRadiography of the chest, Radiology, 1982, 144:909-914.
  • P. B. Grrer, T. Van Doom, Evaluation of an algorithm for theassessment of the MTF using an edge method, Med. Phys, 2000,27(9):2048-2059.
  • P Doyle, C J Martin, D Gentle, Dose-image quality optimizationin digital chest radiography, Radiat Prot Dosim, 2005, 114:269-272.
  • Okka W. Hamer, Contrast-Detail Phantom Study for X-raySpectrum Optimization Regarding Chest Radiography Using a CesiumIodide-Amorphous Silicon Flat-Panel Detector, Invest Radiol, 2004,39:610-618.
  • Nelson WR, Hirayama H, Rogers DWO, The EGS4 code system,Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, 1985, SLAC-256.
  • National Research Council, The EGSnrc Code System: MonteCarlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport, NRCC ReportPIRS-701, 2003.
  • Moon SJ, Kim YG, Lee SG, Reduction of patient dose exposureand improvement of image quality by use of additional filtration indigital radiology, Korean J Digit Imaging Med, 2010, 19-25.
  • Min-Yong Lee, The effect of x-ray filter materials in the skindose and tube loading at x-ray examinations, Seoul, Korea, KoreaUniversity , 2005.
  • M. L. Giger, K. Doi, C. E. Metz, Investigation of basic imagingproperties in digital radiography. 1. noise wiener spectrum, Med. Phys, 1984, 11:797-805
  • Lee, Jea Kwang, Geant 4 simulation to HPGe detector responses,Cheongju, Korea, Korea National University of Education, 2007.
  • Lee SH, Heh J, Lee JW, Kim JM, Clinical application of invertertype x-ray generator, Journal of radiological science and technology,1992, 15(1):107-113.
  • Lee Jong Woong, Study on quantitative evaluation of imagequality of imaging plate depending on number of x-ray exposure,Seoul, Korea, Korea University , 2010.
  • Lee JO, Jeong DH, Moon SR, Kang JK, Kim SG, Calculation ofphoton spectra from the tungsten target for 10MeV electron beam,Korean Journal of Medical Physics, 1999, 10(1):55-62.
  • Lazaro. D, Buvat. I, Loudos. G, Strul. D, Santin. G, et al,Validation of the gate monte carlo simulation platform for modeling aCSI scintillation camera dedicated to small-animal imaging, Phys. Med. Bio, 2004, 49(5):271-285.
  • Lanndry DJ, Anderson DW, Measurement of acceleratorbrmsstrahlung spectra with a high-efficiency Ge detector, Med. Phys, 1991, 18(3):527-532.
  • Laitno RF, Pani R, Pellegrini R, Detemination of x-ray spectra andof the scattered component up to 300 kV, Med Phys, 1991,18(5):934-938.
  • Kook L, Yib Bruce R Whiting, Thomas E Kocher, David PTrauernicht, Understanding the relative sensitivity of radiographicscreens to scattered radiation, Med. Phys, 1996, 23(1):1727-1737.
  • K Smans, L Struelens, M Smet, H Bosmans, F Vanhavere, Cufiltration for dose reduction in neonatal chest imaging, Radia ProtDosim, 2005, 114:269-272.
  • Jan. S, Santin. G, Strul. D, Staelens. S, Assie. K, Autret. D, et al,Gate: a simulation toolkit for pet and spect, Phsics in medicine andbiology, 2004, 49(19):4543-4561.
  • Jan. S, Boisgard. R, Y. Eroukhmanoff, Fontyn. Y, Comtat. C, et al,Accuracy and variability of quantitative values obtained for mouseimaging using the micro pet focus, Nuclear science symposiumconference record, 2004, 5:2934-2937.
  • J. T. Dobbins Ⅲ, D. L. Ergun, L. Rutz, D. A. Hinshaw, H. Blume,D. C. Clark, DQE of four generations of computed radiographyacquisition devices, Med. Phys, 1987, 14:533-537.
  • J. Morishita, H. Macmahon, K. Doi, M. Carlin, Y. Sukenobu,Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chestradiography, Med. Phys, 1994, 21:1769-1775.
  • Illers H, Buhr E, and Hoeschen C, Measurement of the detectivequantum efficiency(DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to thenovel standard IEC 62220-1, Raiat. Prot. Dosimetry, 2005, 114(1-3):39-44
  • Ikuo Kawashita, Development of an automated method forevaluation of sharpness of digital radiographs using edge method,Physics of medical imaging Proceeding of SPIE, 2001, 4320.
  • IEC(International Electrotechnical Commission)62220-1. Medical electrical equipment Characteristics of digital X-ray imagingdevices Part 1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency. Geneva, 2003.
  • IEC(International Electrotechnical Commission)61267. Medicaldiagnostic X-ray equipment Radiation conditions for use in thedetermination of characteristics, Geneva, 1994.
  • Hoi-Woun Jeong, Broad beam transmission properties of somecommon shielding materials for use in diagnostic x-ray, Seoul,Korea, Korea University , 2004.
  • Halbleib JA, Kensek RP, Valdez GD, Seltzer SM, Berger MJ, ITS:The integrated TIGER series of electron/photon transport codesversion3.0, IEEE. Trans. Nucl. Sci, 1992, 39:1025-1030.
  • H. S. Kim, J. H. Jeang, J. W. Lee, Research on Image Quality andEffective dose by Exposure Index Variation, Journal of the KoreaSociety of Radiology, 2013, 7(1):63-69.
  • H Fujita, D. Y. Tsai, T. Ithoh, K. Doi, J. Morishita, et al, A simplemethod for determining the modulation transfer function in digitalradiography, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 1992, 11:34-39.
  • H D Nagel, Comparison of performance characteristics ofconventional and K-edge filters in general diagnostic radiology, PhysMed Bilo, 1989, 34(9):1269-1287.
  • H Achinger, Radiation exposure and image quality in x-raydiagnostic radiology, Springer, 2003, 1st Ed:75-78.
  • Granfors P. R, Aufrichting R, DQE(f) of an amorphous-siliconflat-panel x-ray detector: detector parameter influences andmeasurement methodology physics of medical imaging, SPIE, 2000,3997.
  • GEANT4 Collaboration: Geant4 User's Documents, Introductionto Geant4 for GEANT4, 2007.
  • Faddegon BA, Ross CK, Rogers DW, Angular distribution ofbremsstrahlung from 15 MeV electron incident on thick target of beAl and Pb, Med. Phys, 1991, 18(4):727-739.
  • Eun-Kyung Im, The effect of x-ray kVp and Cu-filter thicknessat x-ray examination image using MTF, NPS and DQEmeasurements, Seoul, Korea, Korea University , 2006.
  • Eun-Hee Mo, A Study on the dose calculation of a radiationtreatment plan using Geant4 and DICOM files, Jeonju, Korea,Chonbuk National University, 2013.
  • Ehsan Sameiand Michael J. Flynn, An experimental comparison ofdetector performance for direct and indirect digital radiographysystems, Med. Phys, 2003, 30(4):608-622.
  • Dea-Woo Seok, The Evaluation of imaging performance of thea-Se based flat panel x-ray detector system using MTF, NPS, andDQE measurements, Gimhea, Korea, Inje University, 2004.
  • Cunningham IA, Reid BK, Signal and noise in modulation transferfuction determination using the slit, wire, and edge technique, Med. Phys, 1992, 19:1034-1044.
  • Cunningham IA, Fenster A, A method for modulation transferfunction determination from edge profiles with correction for finiteelementdifferentiation, Med. Phys, 1987, 14:533-537
  • Chung YH, Beak CH, Lee SJ, Monte carlo simulation codes fornuclear medicine imaging, Nucl. Med. Mol, 2006, 42(2):127-136.
  • Cho WI, Kim YK, Lee GD, Change of dose exposure andimprovement of image quality by additional filtration inmammography, Journal of Radiation Protection, 2013, 38(2):78-90.
  • Calicchia A, Gambaccin M, Indovina PL, Mazzei F, Pugliani L,Niobium/molybudenum k-edge filtration in mammography: contrastand dose evaluation, Phys. Med. Biol, 1996, 41(9):1717-1726.
  • CE Metz, K. Doi, Transfer function analysis of radiographicimaging systems, Phys. Med. Biol. 1979, 24:1079-1106.
  • Buvat I, Castigiglioni I, Monte carlo simulation in spect and pet,QJ. Nucl. Med. 2002, 46:48-61.
  • Burgess AE, Physical measurements of heavy metal filterperformance, Med. Phys, 1985, 12:225-23147. Arkins HL, Fairchild RG, Robertson JS, Greenburg D, Effect ofabsorption edge filters on diagnostic x-ray spectra, Radiology, 1983,49:210-214.
  • Brun R, Bruyant F, Maire M, McPherson AC, Zanarini P, GEANT3CERN, 1997, DD/EE/84-1.
  • Briesmeister JF, MCNP-A general monte carlo code for neutronand photon transport version 3A, Los Alamos National Laboratory,1997, LA-12625-M.
  • Assie, Karine, Breton, Vincent, Buvat, Irene, et al, Monte carlosimulation in pet and spect instrumentation using gate, Nuclearinstruments and methods in physics research, 2004, 527:180-189.
  • A. Rose, Sensitivity performance of the human eye on anabsolute scale, J. Opt. Soc. Am, 1948, 38:196-208.
  • 24, M Sandborg, G A Carlsson, Influence of x-ray energy spectrum,contrasting detail and detector on the signal-to-noise ratio(SNR)and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) in projection radiography,Phys Med Biol, 1992, 37(6):1245-1263.