연구동향 분석
박사

대학생 대상 프로젝트 기반학습에서 팀 리더십, 팀 프로세스, 팀 효과성의 구조적 관계 분석

김진희 2015년

논문상세정보
    • 저자 김진희
    • 기타서명 Analyzing sStructural relationships between team leadership, team process and team effectiveness in project-based learning for engineering students
    • 형태사항 삽화: ix, 119 p.
    • 일반주기 지도교수: 정재삼, 참고문헌: p. 92-108
    • 학위논문사항 학위논문(박사)-, 교육공학과,, 2015. 8. 졸업, 이화여자대학교 대학원:
    • DDC 300
    • 발행지 서울 :
    • 언어 kor
    • 출판년 2015
    • 발행사항 이화여자대학교 대학원,
    유사주제 논문( 0)
인용/피인용

' 대학생 대상 프로젝트 기반학습에서 팀 리더십, 팀 프로세스, 팀 효과성의 구조적 관계 분석' 의 참고문헌

  • 한국 팀제의 역사 현황과 발전 방향
    박원우 서울: 서울대학교출판부 [2006]
  • 프로젝트 팀 내 공유리더십이 팀 효능감과 팀 몰입에 미치는 영향 ?과업조정 및 업무분담의 매개효과 검증
    노현재 심덕섭 양동민 기업경영연구,19(2), 127-147 [2012]
  • 프로젝트 기반 수업을 통한 대학원 학생들의 학습경험에 관한 연구
    박민정 교육과정연구, 25(3), 265-288 [2007]
  • 팀이란 무엇인가 (김태훈 역). 서울: 라이프맵. (원저 2010 출판)Bishop. J. W., Scott K. D., & Burroughs, S. M. (2000). Support commitment, andemployee outcomes in an team environment
    Belbin, M. R. Journal of Management,26(6), 1113-1132 [2012]
  • 팀 특성과 팀 유효성의 관계에서 팀 신뢰의 매개효과 및 팀 효능감의 조절효과 분석. 미출판 박사학위논문
    김기조 충남대학교 [2013]
  • 팀 변혁적 리더십과 팀 효율성의 관계에서 팀워크 과정의 매개 역할. 미출판 박사학위논문
    이종선 경상대학교 [2010]
  • 캡스톤디자인을 활용한 학습성과 평가
    김성동 김정엽 이희원 대한기계학회, 52(9), 35-39 [2012]
  • 창의적 문제해결과 공학설계 (명지대학교 창의공학 연구회 역). 서울: 파워북
  • 창의적 공학설계
    김은경 서울: 한빛아카데미 [2013]
  • 창의설계입문
    창의설계교육연구회 광주: 전남대학교출판부 [2014]
  • 집단의 특성 및 과정과 효과성의 관계
  • 집단 내 갈등(관계갈등과 과업갈등)의 개념구성과 인과 경로에 관한 연구
    문연희 심덕섭 양동민 최지호 대한경영학회, 24(3), 1287-1307 [2011]
  • 지속적인 기업체 연계 프로젝트 기반의 캡스톤 설계 운영시스템
    권순각 김성우 박유현 공학교육연구, 16(3), 61-68 [2013]
  • 의존심과 독립성의 조화: 변혁적 리더십의 양면성과 신뢰및 지각된 통제의 매개역할
    김병직 정명호 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 25(2),453-476 [2012]
  • 온라인 팀 프로젝트에서 팀 리더의 상호작용패턴 분석
    김영수 임규연 허희옥 교육정보미디어 연구, 15(4), 295-317 [2009]
  • 연구개발팀에서 팀내 갈등과 팀 혁신성과간의 관계에서 팀 학습행동의 매개역할
    김지연 김학수 이준호 지식경영연구, 14(5), 81-100 [2013]
  • 신제품 개발팀에서 상호작용과 성과와의 관계 : 집단효능감과 참여의 역할을 중심으로
    김병재 이원준 한국마케팅저널, 7(1), 43-65 [2005]
  • 소프트웨어 개발 팀의 커뮤니케이션과 팀 효과성에 관한 연구
    서인석 경영교육연구, 34, 17-42 [2004]
  • 소통의 리더십 (김영임, 최재민 역). 서울:한국방송통신대학교출판부
    Hackman, M. Z. Johnson, C. (원저 2009 출판) [2010]
  • 사회과학연구방법론 (수정판)
    이군희 파주: 광암문화사 [2012]
  • 변혁적 리더십과 조직몰입과의 관계에서 신뢰가 미치는 영향
    최학수 창의력개발연구, 11, 79-104 [2009]
  • 대학생 프로젝트 팀의 구성, 프로세스, 성과 간의 관계에 대한 형태적 연구
    문연희 심덕섭 양동민 최지호 한국상업교육학회, 22, 69-88 [2008]
  • 구조방정식모형분석
    김계수 서울: SPSS 아카데미 [2010]
  • 구조방정식모델링의 이해와 적용 : with AMOS 17. 0
    문수백 서울: 학지사 [2009]
  • 공유리더십이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향과 과업갈등과 관계갈등의매개효과. 미출판 석사학위논문
    이준명 중앙대학교 [2015]
  • 공과 대학생을 위한 창의설계 입문
  • 경영대학원 베스트 퍼포먼스를 창출하는 팀경영법 (최지아 역). 서울: 웅진윙스. (원저 2005 출판)황희순, 김영국 (2014). 외식업 조직구성원의 팀 효능감이 팀 내 갈등과 팀 서비스성과에 미치는 영향
    하버드 외식경영연구, 17(1), 331-351 [2007]
  • “리더십 행동특성과 조직유효성의 관계에서 신뢰의조절효과”
    남선희 신철우 인적자원개발연구, 8(1), 57-81 [2006]
  • “공학대학 캡스톤디자인(창의적 공학 설계) 교육과정 운영실태 및 학습 만족도 조사”
    이동욱 이태식 장병철 전영준 공학교육연구, 12(2), 36-50 [2009]
  • de Graaff, E., & Ravesteijn, W. (2001). Training complete engineers: Globalenterprise and engineering education. European Journal of EngineeringEducation, 26(4), 419-427.
  • Zhang, X., Cao, Q., & Tjosvold, D. (2011). Linking transformational leadershipand team performance: A conflict management approach. Journal ofManagement Studies, 48(7), 1586-1611.
  • Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229-239.
  • Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. TheLeadership Quarterly, 12, 451-483.
  • Zaccaro, S. J., & Klimoski, R. (2002). The interface of leadership and teamprocess. Group and Organization Management, 27, 4-13.
  • Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). UK: Pearson.
  • Wurdinger, S. D., Haar, J., Hugg, B., & Bezon, J. (2007). A qualitative studyusing project based learning in a mainstream middle school. ImprovingSchools, 10(2), 150?61.
  • Wurdinger, S. D., & Qureshi, M. (2015) Enhancing college students’life skillsthrough project based learning. Innovative Higher Education, 40(3),279-286.
  • Williams, M. (2001). In whom we trust: Group membership as an affectivecontext for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26(3),377-396.
  • Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M.(1998). “Managers as Initiators of Trust: An ExchangeRelationship Framework for Understanding ManagerialTrustworthy Behavior.” Academy of Management Review,23(3), 513-530.
  • Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-relateddiversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis.Journal of Management, 27(2), 141-162.
  • Wang, G., Oh, I., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. 2011. Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36(2): 223-270.
  • Wall, T. D., Kemp, N. J., Jackson, P. R., & Clegg, C. W. (1986). Outcomes ofautonomous work groups: A long term field experiment. Academy ofManagement Journal, 29(2), 280-304.
  • Wall, J. A., & Callister, R. R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal ofManagement, 21, 515-558.
  • Varona, F. (1996). Relationship between communication satisfaction andorganizational commitment in three guatemalan organizations. Journal ofBusiness Communication, 33(2), 111-140.
  • Vandewaerde, M., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F., & Bammens, Y. (2011). Boardteam leadership revisited: A conceptual model of shared leadership inthe boardroom. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 403-420.
  • Van der vegt, G., & Eman, B. (2000). Team members’affective responses topatterns of intergroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal ofManagement, 26(4), 633-655.
  • Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., & Tesluk, P. E. (2009). A longitudinal study ofteam conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness.Group & Organization Management, 34(4), 170-205.
  • Tan, H. H., & Lim, A. K. H. (2009). Trust in coworkers and trust inorganizations. The Journal of Psychology, 143(1), 45-66.
  • Sundstorm, E., DeMeuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applicationsand effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2), 120-133.
  • Stogdill, R. M. (1950). Leadership, membership and organization. PsychologicalBullein, 47, 1-14.
  • Steyrer, J., Schiffinger, M., & Lang, R. (2008). Organizational commitment-Amissing link between leadership behavior and organizational performance?Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(4), 364-374.
  • Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance:Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderatingrole of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 135-148.
  • Solansky, S. T. (2008). Leadership style and team processes in self-managedteams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(4), 322-341.
  • Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., & Sims, H. P. (1994). Top management teamdemography and process: The role of social integration andcommunication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412-438.
  • Smith, J. B., & Barclay, W. B. (1997). The effects of organizational differencesand trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. Journal ofMarketing, 61, 3-21.
  • Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W. D., Avolio, B. J., & Jung, D. I. (2002). Anlongitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potencyof group performance. Group & Organization Management, 27, 66-96.
  • Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict intop management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 85(1), 102-111.
  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimentalstudies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Method, 7(4),422-445.
  • Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior(3rd ed.). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
  • Shah, P., & Jehn, K. A. (1993). Do friends perform better than acquaintances?The interaction of friendship, conflict and task. Group Decision andNegotiation, 2, 149-166.
  • Schwepker, C. H., & Good, D. J. (2013). Improving salespeople’s trust in theorganization, moral judgement and performance through transformationalleadership. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28(7), 535-546.
  • Schippers. M. C., Den Hartog. D. N., Koopman. P. L., & Wienk. J. A. (2003).Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcomeinterdependence and group longevity. and the mediating effect ofreflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 24. 779-802.
  • Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based andaffect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on teamperformance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 863-871.
  • Rousseau, V., Aube, C., & Savoie, A. (2006). Teamwork behaviors: A review andan integration of framework. Small Group Research, 37(5), 540-570.
  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
  • Priem, R., & Price, K. (1991). Process and outcome expectations for thedialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus techniques ofstrategic decision making. Group and Organization Studies, 16, 206-225.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies forassessing and comparing indirect effect in multiple mediator models,Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
  • Postmes, T., Tanis, M., & de Wit, B. (2001). Communication and commitment inorganizations: A social identity approach. Group Processes & IntergroupRelations, 4(3), 227-246.
  • Portoghese, I., Galletta, M., Battistelli, A., Saiani, L., Penna, M. P., & Allegrini, E.(2012). Change-related expectations and commitment to change ofnurses: The role of leadership and communication. Journal of NursingManagement, 20, 582-591.
  • Pinto, M. B., & Pinto, J. K. (1990). Project team communication and crossfunctional cooperation in new program development. Product InnovationManagement, 7, 200-212.
  • Pillai, P., Kohles, J. C., Bligh, M. C., Carsten, M. K., & Brodowsky, G. (2011).Leadership in Confucian Asia a three-country study of justice, trust, andtransformational leadership. Organization Management Journal, 8(4),242-259.
  • Pearce, C. L., Conger, J. A., & Locke, E. A. (2007). Shared leadership theory.The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 281-288.
  • Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2002). The relative influence of vertical vs. sharedleadership on the longitudinal effectiveness of change managementteams. Group Dynamics, Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 172-197.
  • Pearce, C. L., & Herbik, P. A. (2004). Citizenship behavior at the team level ofanalysis: The effects of team leadership, team commitment, perceived teamsupport, and team size. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(3), 293-310.
  • Pearce, C. L. (2004). The further of leadership: Combining vertical and sharedleadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of ManagementExecutive, 18(1), 47-57.
  • Peace, C. L., & Manz, C. C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: Theimportance of self- and Shared leadership in knowledge work.Organizational Dynamics, 34(2), 130-140.
  • Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents ofproactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652.
  • O’Toole, J., Galbraith, J., & Lawler, E. E. (2002). When two(or more) heads arebetter than one. California Management Review, 44, 65-83.
  • Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Mackenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizationalcitizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. London:Sage.
  • Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership-Theory and Practice (4th ed). CA: Sage.
  • Neufeld, D. J., Wan, Z., & Fang. Y. (2010). Remote leadership, communicationeffectiveness and leader performance. Group Decision & Negotiation,19(3), 227-246.
  • Ndubisi, N. O. (2011). Conflict handling, trust and commitment in outsourcingrelationship: A Chinese and Indian Study. Industrial MarketingManagement, 40, 109-117.
  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D.(1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
  • Mehra, A., Smith, D. A., & Rovertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams:The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. TheLeadership Quarterly, 17, 232-245.
  • McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance(TIP): A theory ofgroups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
  • McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  • McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. NewYork: Holt.Rinehart and Winston.
  • McAllister, D. J.(1995). Affect-and Cognition-based Trust as Foundation for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal. 38(1): 24-59.
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schollrman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model oforganization trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
  • Matthai, J. M. (1989). Employee perceptions of trust, satisfaction, andcommitment as predictors of turnover intentions in a mental healthsetting. Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse Into thefuture. Journal of Management, 34(4), 410-476.
  • Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A Review and meta-Analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of Organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171-194.
  • Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally basedframework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of ManagementReview, 26(3), 356-376.
  • Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1993). Business without bosses: How self-managingteams are building high-performance companies. NewYork: Wiley.
  • Lin, J., Liu, X., & Zeng, X. (2011). Does transactional leadership count for teaminnovativeness?: The moderating role of emotional labor and themediating role of team efficacy. Journal of Organizational ChangeManagement, 24(3), 282-298.
  • Lee, P., Gillespie, N., Mann, L., & Wearing, A. (2010). Leadership and trust:Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. ManagementLearning, 41(4), 473-491.
  • Langfred, C. W. (2000), Work-group design and autonomy: A field study of theinteraction between task interdependence and group autonomy, SmallGroup Research, 31(1), 54-70.
  • Laffey, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 73-86.
  • Ladebo, O. J. (2005). Perceptions of trust and employees’attitudes: A look atNigeria’s agricultural extension workers. Journal of Business andPsychology, 20(3), 409-427.
  • Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching science: A project-basedapproach. NewYork: McGraw-Hill College.
  • Kotlya, I., Karakowsky, L., & Ng, P. (2011). Leader behaviors, conflict andmember commitment to team-generated decisions. The LeadershipQuarterly, 22(4), 666-679.
  • Kolmos, A., & de Graaff, E. (2007). Process of changing to PBL. In E. de Graaff& A. Kolmos (Eds.), Management of change: Implementation ofproblem-based and project-based learning in engineering. Rotterdam:SEMSE Publisher.
  • Kolb, J. A. (1996). Let’s bring structure back: A commentary. ManagementCommunication Quarterly, 9(4), 452-465.
  • Kline, T. J. B., & O’Grady, J. K. (2009). Team member personality, teamprocesses and outcomes: Relationships within a graduate student projectteam sample. North American Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 369-382.
  • Kline, T. J. B. (2003). The Psychometric properties of scales that assess marketorientation and team leadership skills: A preliminary study. InternationalJournal of Testing, 3(4), 321-332.
  • Kline, K. J. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nded.). NewYork: The Guilford Press.
  • Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps inconceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. OrganizationalResearch methods, 3(3), 211-236.
  • Klaussner, S. (2012). Trust and leadership: Toward an interactive perspective.Journal of Change Management, 12(4), 417-439.
  • Kilpatrick, W. H. (1926). The Project Method : The Use of the Purposeful Act in the Educative Process. NY: Teachers College Press of Columbia University.
  • Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making.Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 623-655.
  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformationalleadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology,88(2), 246-255.
  • Jones, B. F., Rasmussen, C. M., & Moffit, M. C. (1997). Real-life problem solving: A collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
  • Jollands, M., Jolly, L., & Molyneaux, T. (2012). Project-based learning as acontributing factor to graduates’s work readiness. European Journal ofEngineering Education, 37(2), 143-154.
  • Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: Alongitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academyof Management Journal, 44(2), 238-251.
  • Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multi-method examination of the benefits and detriments ofintragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
  • Ishikawa, J. (2012). Leadership and performance in Japanese R&D teams. AsiaPacific Business Review, 18(2), 241-258.
  • Hunt, J. G., & Ropo, A. (1997). Leadership and faculty motivation. In J. L. Bess(Ed.), Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively(pp. 219?247). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.
  • Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (2009). Leadership: Enhancing thelessons of experience. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
  • Huang, J. C. (2012). The relationship between conflict and team performance inTaiwn: The moderating effect of goal orientation. The InternationalJournal of Human Resource Management, 23(10), 2126-2143.
  • Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: Theinfluences of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, andidea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15,130-144.
  • House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership:Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23, 409-473.
  • Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 485?538). (3rd ed.). NewYork:Random House.
  • Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success ofinnovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence.Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449.
  • Hiller, N. J., Day, D. V., & Vance, R. J. (2006). Collective enactment ofleadership roles and team effectiveness: A field Study. The LeadershipQuarterly, 17, 387-397.
  • Henderson, J. C., & Lee, S. (1992). Managing I/S design teams: A control theoriesperspective. Management Science, 38(6), 757-777.
  • Heldal, F., & Antonsen, S. (2014). Team leadership in a high-risk organization:The role of contextual factors. Small Group Research, 45, 1-24.
  • Hauschildt, J., & Kirchmann, E. (2001). Teamwork for innovation?The Trioka ofpromoters. R&D Management, 31, 441?444.
  • Hackman, J. R., & Walton, R. E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations, In P. S.Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective workgroups (pp.72-119). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hackman, J. R. (1987) The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.),Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  • Gupta, V. K., Huang, R., & Niranjan, S. (2010). A longitudinal examination of therelationship between team leadership and performance. Journal ofLeadership & Organizational Studies, 17(4). 335-350.
  • Gundersen, G., Hellesoy, B. T., & Raeder, S. (2012). Leading international projectteams: The effectiveness of transformational leadership in dynamic workenvironments. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 46-57.
  • Groysberg, B., & Abrahams, R. (2006). Lift outs: How to acquire a highfunctioning team. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 133-140.
  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The LeadershipQuarterly, 13, 423?451.
  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.
  • Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness.Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499-517.
  • Gillespie, N. (2003). Measuring trust in working relationships: The behavioral trustinventory. Paper presented at the 5th Australian Industrial OrganizationalPsychology Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Gibb, C. A. (1968). leadership. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook ofsocial psychology: Vol. 2. (pp. 205-282). MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Gemuenden, H. G., & Lechler, T. (1997). Success factors of project management:The critical few: An empirical Investigation. Porland InternationalConference on Management of Engineering and Technology. 375-377.
  • Fry, L., & Slocum, J. (1984). Technology, structure and work group effectiveness:A test of a contingency model. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2),221-246.
  • Freeman, K. A. (1996). Attitudes toward work in project groups as predictors ofacademic performance. Small Group Research, 27(2), 265-282.
  • Frank, M., Lavy, I., & Elata, D. (2003). Implementing the project-based learningapproach in an academic engineering course. International Journal ofTechnology and Design Education, 13, 273-288.
  • Foy, N. (1994). Empowering people at work. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
  • Fiedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Ruark, G. A., & Mumford, M. D.(2009). A framework for understanding collective leadership: Theselective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. TheLeadership Quarterly, 20, 933-958.
  • Ferres, N., Connell, J., & Travaglione, A. (2004). Co-worker trust as a socialcatalyst for constructive employee attitudes. Journal of ManagementPsychology, 19(6), 608-622.
  • Ensley, M. E., Pearson, A., & Pearce, C. L. (2003). Top management team processshared leadership, an new venture performance: A theoretical model andresearch agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 329-346.
  • Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance ofvertical and shared leadership within new venture top managementteams: Implications for the performance of startups. The LeadershipQuarterly, 17(3), 217-231.
  • Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformationalleadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment.Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735-744.
  • Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-basedlearning: a practical ‘how to’ for teaching undergraduate courses inany discipline. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Drath, W. H., McCauley, C. D., Palus, C. J., Velsor, E. V., O'Connor, P. M. G., &McGuire, J. B. (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a moreintegrative ontology of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(6),635-653.
  • Drath, W. H. (2001). The deep blue sea: Rethinking the source of leadership. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.
  • Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwter, L. E., & Spangler, W. D. (2004).Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal ofOrganizational Change Management, 17(2), 177-193.
  • Diehl, W., Grobe, T., Lopez, H., & Cabral, C. (1999). Project-based learning: A strategy for teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Center for Youth Development and Education, Corporation for Business, Work, and Learning.
  • Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B. & Singleton, C. A. (2006). Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools: Examining the effects of team structures. Urban Education, 41(6), 603-627.
  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict,team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749.
  • Curran, P. J., West. S. G., & Finch. J. F(1996). The Robustness of Test Statistics to Nonnormality and Specification Error in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1): 16-29.
  • Costa, A. C., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. (2001). Trust within teams: The relationwith performance effectiveness. European Journal of Work andOrganizational Psychology, 10(3), 225-244.
  • Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. (2011). Measuring trust in teams: Development andvalidation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflectiveindicators of team trust. European Journal of Work and OrganizationalPsychology, 20(1), 119-154.
  • Costa, A. C. (2003). Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32(5),605-622.
  • Corderey, J. L., Mueller, W. S., & Smith, L. M. (1991). Attitudinal and behavioraleffects of autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study.Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 463-476.
  • Contractor, N. S, DeChurch, L. A., Carson, J., Carter, D. R., Keegan, B. (2012).The topology of collective leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6),994-1011.
  • Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of management, 23(3), 239-290.
  • Carsten, K. W., & Laurie, R. W. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, teamperformance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749.
  • Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams:An investigations of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy ofManagement Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234.
  • Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between workgroup characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designingeffective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
  • Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: Amulti-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 606-632.
  • Brown, M. E., & Gioia, D. A. (2002). Making things click: Distributive leadershipin an online division of an offline organization. The LeadershipQuarterly, 13(4), 397-419.
  • Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformationalleadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevelmediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 270-283.
  • Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. E. (1966). Predicting organizational effectivenesswith a four factor theory of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly,11, 238-263.
  • Boulding, K. (1963). Conflict and defense. NewYork: Harper & Row.
  • Bouckenooghe, D., Clercq, D. D., & Deprez, J. (2014). Interpersonal justice,relational conflict, and commitment to change: The moderating role ofsocial interaction. Applied Psychology, 63(3), 509-540.
  • Bottger, P. (1984). Expertise and air time as bases of actual and perceivedinfluence in problem-solving group. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2),214-221.
  • Boone, C., & Hendricks, W. (2009). Top management team diversity and firmperformance: Moderators of functional-background and locus-of-controldiversity. Management Science, 55, 165?180.
  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., &Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining thedoing, supporting the doing, supporting the learning. EducationalPsychologist, 26(3/4), 369-398.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick. NJ:Transaction.
  • Bass, B. M. (1990). Leadership and performance beyond expectations (2nd ed.).NewYork: Free Press.
  • Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness throughtransformational leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspectiveEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 25-36.
  • Bales, R. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of smallgroups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., Murry, W., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Buildinghighly developed team: Focusing on shared leadership processes,efficacy, trust and performance. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies onWork Teams, 3, 173-209.
  • Aube, C., & Rousseau, V. (2011). Interpersonal aggression and teameffectiveness: The mediating role of team goal commitment. Journal ofOccupational & Organizational Psychology, 84(3), 565-580.
  • Aube, C., & Rousseau, V. (2005). Team goal commitment and team effectiveness:The role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. GroupDynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(3), 189-204.
  • Astin, H. S., & Astin, A. W. (1996). A social change model of leadershipdevelopment guidebook, version 3. Los Angeles: University of California,Los Angeles.
  • Allen,N.J.,& Meyer,J.P.1990.Themeasurementandantecedentsof affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization.Journalofoccupationalpsychology,63(1),1-18.