연구동향 분석
박사

비유창실어증 환자의 능동문과 피동문 이해 특성

김정연 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 비유창실어증 환자의 능동문과 피동문 이해 특성' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • agrammatism
  • nonfluent aphasia
  • processing limitation
  • sentence comprehension
  • syntactic deficit
  • 문장이해
  • 비유창실어증
  • 실문법증
  • 처리과정적 제한
  • 통사적 결손
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
62 0

0.0%

' 비유창실어증 환자의 능동문과 피동문 이해 특성' 의 참고문헌

  • 현대통사론의 이해. 2판
    우윤식 부산: 부산외국어대학교 출판부; [2001]
  • 현대국어통사론. 2판
    남기심 서울: 태학사 [2002]
  • 현대 국어 피동 연구
    이정택 서울: 박이정 [2004]
  • 현대 국어 사용빈도 조사 2
  • 한국어 문법의 이해(개정증보판)
    이주행 서울: 월인 [2004]
  • 한국 브로카 실어증 환자의 문장 이해
    황민아 언어청각장애연구 2002;7:64-84. [2002]
  • 파라다이스?한국판-웨스턴 실어증 검사(PARADISE? Korean Version-The Western Aphasia Battery)
    김향희 나덕렬 서울: 파라다이스 복지 재단; [2001]
  • 월의 분류와 특징-생성과정과 관련하여2
    김일웅 한글 1987;198:51-86. [1987]
  • 브로카 실어증의 실문법증: 격조 사 산출과 이해의 해리
    김동휘 남기춘 임창국 정재범 편성범 한국심리학회지 ;18:49-64 [1999]
  • 브로카 실어증 환자의 관계절 문장 이해
    김윤주 연세대학교 대학원 석사 학위논문; [2002]
  • 브로카 실어증 환자들의 문장 이해에서 보조사 처리
    황주희 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2002]
  • 국어 어순의 통사적 성격
    李庭勳 어문연구 2002;30:93-114. [2002]
  • 국어 어순 연구
    성기철 한글 ;218:77-114 [1992]
  • [학교문법의 이해] 문장. 개정판
    나찬연 서울: 제이앤씨 [2007]
  • ?1) Thompson CK. Treatment of underlying forms: a linguistic specific approach for sentence production deficits in agrammatic aphasia. In Chapey R, editor. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p.605-74.
  • 9) Su Y, Lee S, Chung Y. Asyntactic thematic role assignment by Mandarin aphasics: a test of the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis and the Double Dependency Hypothesis. Brain Lang 2007;101:1-18.
  • 8) Caramazza A, Zurif EB. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain Lang 1976;3:572-82.
  • 7) Howard D, Hatfield FM. Aphasia therapy: historical and contemporary issues. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1987.
  • 69) Friederici, AD, Graetz, PAM. Processing passive sentence in aphasia: deficits and strategies. Brain Lang 1987;30;93-105.
  • 68) Meyer AM, Mack JE, Thompson CK. Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia. J Neurolinguist 2012;25;31-43.
  • 67) Linebarger MC, Schwartz MF, Saffran EM. Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition 1983;13;361-392.
  • 65) Mack JE, Ji W, Thompson CK. Effects of verb meaning on lexical integration in agrammatic aphasia: evidence from eyetracking. J Neurolinguist 2013;26;619-636.
  • 63) Caplan D, Waters G, Hildrebrandt, N. Determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasic patients in sentence-picture matching tasks. J Speech lang Hear Res 1997;40:540-55.
  • 62) Caplan D, Waters G, DeDe G, Michaud J, Reddy A. A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: behavioral(psycholinguistic) aspects. Brain Lang 2007;101:103-50.
  • 6) Berndt RS, Caramazza A. A redefinition of syndrome of Broca's aphasia: implications of a neuropsychological model of language. Appl Psycholinguist 1980;1:225-78.
  • 57) Burchurt F, De Bleser R, Sonntag K. Does morphology make the difference? agrammatic sentence comprehension in German. Brain Lang 2003;87:323-42.
  • 56) Lee M. On agrammatic deficits in English and Korean[Dissertation]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii; 2000.
  • 55) Friedmann N, Shapiro LP. Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003;46:288-97.
  • 54) Caramazza A, Capasso R, Capitani E, Miceli G. Patterns of comprehension performance in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia: a test of the Trace Deletion Hypothesis. Brain Lang 2005;94:43-53.
  • 53) Lee M, Thompson CK. Agrammatic aphasic production and comprehension of unaccusative verbs in sentence contexts. J Neurolinguist 2004;17:315-30.
  • 52) Grodzinsky Y. Trace deletion, ?-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain Lang 1995;51:469-97.
  • 5) Adams RD, Victor M. Principles of neurology. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993.
  • 44) Beretta A, Schmitt C, Halliwell J, Munn A, Cuetos F, Kim S. The effects of scrambling on spanish and Korean agrammatic interpretation: why linear models fail and structural models survives. Brain Lang 2001;79:407-25.
  • 43) Mauner G, Fromkin VA, Cornell TL. Comprehension and acceptability judgements in agrammatism: disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain Lang 1993;45:340-70.
  • 42) Grodzinsky Y. A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain Lang 1995;5:26-51.
  • 40) Chomsky N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris; 1981.
  • 4) Damasio H. Neural basis of language disorders. In Chapey R, editor. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p.18-36.
  • 39) Grodzinsky Y. The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca's area. Behav Brain Sci 2000;23:1-71.
  • 38) Myers EB, Blumstein SE. Selectional restriction and semantic priming effects in normals and Broca’s aphasics. J Neurolinguist 2005;18:277-96.
  • 37) Blumstein SE, Milberg WP, Dworetzky B, Rosen A, Gershberg F. Syntactic priming in aphasia: an investigation of local syntactic dependencies. Brain Lang 1991;40:393-421.
  • 36) Haarmann HJ, Kolk HH. On-line sensitivity to subject-verb agreement violations in Broca's aphasics: the role of syntactic complexity and time. Brain Lang 1994;46:493-516.
  • 35) Swinney D, Zurif D, Prather P, Love T. Neurological distribution of processing resources underlying language comprehension. J Cogn Neurosci 1996;8:174-84.
  • 34) Friederici AD, Kilborn K. Temporal constraints on language processing: syntactic priming in Broca’s aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci 1989;1:262-72.
  • 33) Dickey MW, Thompson CK. The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia: evidence from on-line anomaly detection. Brain Lang 2004;88:108-27.
  • 32) Burkhardt P, Pi ango MM, Wong K. The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: evidence from split intransitivity. Brain Lang 2003;86:9-22.
  • 31) Pulverm ller F. Agrammatism: behavioral description and neurobiological explanation. J Cogn Neurosci 1995;7:165-81.
  • 30) Friederici AD, Gorrell P. Structural prominence agrammatic theta-role assignment: a reconsideration of linear strategies. Brain Lang 1998;65:253-75.
  • 3) Naesar MA, Hayward RW. Lesion localization in aphasia with cranial computed tomography and the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Neurology 1978;28:545-51.
  • 29) Saffran EM, Schwartz MF. ‘‘Agrammatic’’ comprehension it’s not: alternatives and implications. Aphasiology 1988;2:389-94.
  • 28) O'Grady W, Lee M. A mapping theory of agrammatic comprehension deficits. Brain Lang 2005;92:91-100.
  • 27) Linebarger MC. Agrammatism as evidence about grammar. Brain Lang 1995;50:52-91.
  • 26) Pi ango MM. Syntactic displacement in Broca's aphasia comprehension. In: Grodzinsky Y, Bastiaanse R, Editors. Grammatical disorders in aphasia: a neurolinguistic perspective. London: Whurr; 1999. p 75-87.
  • 25) Haarmann HJ, Kolk HH. Syntactic priming in Broca's aphasics: evidence for slow activation. Aphasiology 1991;5:247-63.
  • 24) Swinney D, Zurif E. Syntactic processing in aphasia. Brain Lang 1995;50:225-39.
  • 23) Kolk H. A Time-based approach to agrammatic production. Brain Lang 1995;50:282-303.
  • 22) Friederici A. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain Lang 1995;50:259-81.
  • 21) Caplan D, Waters GS. Aphasic disturbances of syntactic comprehension and working memory capacity. Cogn Neurpsychol 1995;12:637-49.
  • 20) Carpenter PA, Miyake A, Just MA. Working memory constraints in comprehension-evidence from individual difference, aphasia and aging. In: Gernshbacher M, Editor. Handbook of psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press; 1994. p.1075-122.
  • 2) Alexander M, LoVerme SR. Aphasia after left hemispheric intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 1980;30:1193-202.
  • 19) Caplan D, Waters GS. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behav Brain Sci 1999;22:77-94.
  • 18) Hagiwara H. The breakdown of functional categories and the economy of derivation. Brain Lang 1995;50:92-116.
  • 17) Grodzinsky Y. The syntactic characterization of agrammatism. Cognition 1984;16:99-120.
  • 16) Goodglass H, Hunt J. Grammatical complexity and aphasic speech. Word 1958;14:197-207.
  • 15) Saffran EM, Schwartz MF, Marin OSM. The word-order problem in agrammatism: I. comprehension. Brain Lang 1980;10:249-62.
  • 14) Caplan D, Futter C. Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an agrammatic patient. Brain Lang 1986;27:117-34.
  • 13) Grodzinsky Y. Cognitive deficits, their proper description, and its theoretical relevance. Brain Lang 1986;27:178-91.
  • 12) Caplan D, Baker C, Dehaut F. Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia. Cognition 1985;21:117-75.
  • 11) Berndt R, Mitchum C. Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis. Cognition 1996;58:289-308.
  • 10) Neuhaus E, Penke M. Production and comprehension of wh-question in German Broca's aphasia. Neurolinguistics 2008;21:150-76.