연구동향 분석
박사

혼성 지각: 타자지각의 지각 가능성에 대한 과학-예술 융합 연구

김정한 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 혼성 지각: 타자지각의 지각 가능성에 대한 과학-예술 융합 연구' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 감각질
  • 관점
  • 지각의 현상학
  • 체화된 인지
  • 타자지각
  • 혼성지각
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
187 0

0.0%

' 혼성 지각: 타자지각의 지각 가능성에 대한 과학-예술 융합 연구' 의 참고문헌

  • 후설의 타자이론의 근본화로서 메를로-퐁티의 타자이론-메를로퐁티의『지각의 현상학』을 중심으로.
    이종주 인문논총 65: 85-132 [2011]
  • 현상학적 지각체계에 의한 정위와 사건의 형성에 관한 연구
    변대중 한국실내디자인학회논문집 21(1): 68-77 [2012]
  • 현대 실천철학에서 칸트 공통감 이론의 중요성 - 자율성과 연대성을 중심으로 -
    김석수 哲學硏究 123: 54 [2012]
  • 판단력비판
    Kant, I. 아카넷 [2009]
  • 통계학
    류근관 법문사 [2010]
  • 칸트의 미감적 자기의식과 타자 - 칸트 미학의 현재성을 향하여.
    최준호 철학제60집: 185-209 [1998]
  • 장소의 혼
    Norberg-Schultz, C. 태림문화사 [1998]
  • 인지적 주목과 감각질
    김효은 한국과학철학회 10(1): 1-26 [2007]
  • 인지심리학: 형성사, 개념적 기초, 조망 서울
    이정모 아카넷 [2001]
  • 인지심리학
    Eysenck, Michael W 학지사 [2009]
  • 인지과학적 접근에서 본 '마음' 개념의 재구성과 심리학 외연의 확장
    이정모 한국심리학회지 26(2): 1-38 [2007]
  • 인지과학의 철학적 이해 (The embodied mind : cognitive scienceand human experience)
    Varela, F. J. 도서출판 옥토 [1997]
  • 인지과학: 학문 간 융합의 원리와 응용
    이정모 성균관대학교 출판부 [2010]
  • 인지과학 방법론 연구.
    김영정 김재권 (2004). 심리철학, 철학과 현실사 [1999]
  • 인지 중심미술 교육론 탐구
    Efland, A. D. 교육과학사 [2006]
  • 인지 신경과학과 신경심리학
    Banich, Marie T 시그마프레스 [2009]
  • 인공생명과 예술
    김진엽 ( Jin Yup Kim ) 이재준 인문논총 58: 117-143▒ [2007]
  • 심미적 컴퓨팅의 오늘.
    이재준 정보과학회지 제28권(제8호): 14-25 [2010]
  • 시각심리학
    Solso, R. L. 시그마그래프 [2003]
  • 새로운 예술을 찾아서: 브레히트 탄생 100주년을 기리며
    Brecht, B. 새길 [1998]
  • 비판과 반성으로서의 미학 -칸트의 미적 판단의 주관적 보편타당성에관하여.
    임성훈 미학 48: 165-208 [2006]
  • 발생적 현상학과 상호주관성의 문제
    이남인 철학사상 16: 20-70 [2003]
  • 발달 심리학과의 대화를 통한 메를로-퐁티의 타자경험의 현상학의 변용과발전.
    이종주 철학과 현상학 연구 52: 92 [2012]
  • 미러링 피플
    Iacoboni, M. 웅진씽크빅 [2009]
  • 몸의 세계, 세계의 몸: 메를로-퐁티의 『지각의 현상학』에 대한 강해 서울
    조광제 이학사 [2004]
  • 눈과 마음
    Merleau-Ponty, M. 마음산책 [2008]
  • 기초심리통계학
    McCall, R. B. 시그마프레스 [2009]
  • 광학적 미디어: 1999년 베를린 강의-예술, 기술, 전쟁
    Kittler, Friedrich A. 현실문화 [2011]
  • 공통 감각과 미적 소통 -칸트 미학을 중심으로-
    임성훈 人文論叢(Seoul NationalUniversity the Journal of Humanites) 66: 7-32 [2011]
  • 『아리스토텔레스 니코마코스 윤리학』
    김남두 서울대학교철학사상연구소 [2004]
  • Zeigler, H. P. and H.-J. Bischof (1993). Vision, brain, and behavior in birds. Cambridge,134Mass., MIT Press.
  • Wright, R. D. and L. M. Ward (2008). Orienting of Attention. Oxford, New York, OxfordUniversity Press.
  • Wands, B. (2006). Art of the Digital Age. London, Thames & Hudson.
  • Vernon, D. (1991). Machine Vision: Automated Visual Inspection and Robot Wision. NewYork, Prentice Hall.
  • Varela, F. J., et al. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience.Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  • Vallar, G. (1997). "Spatial frames of reference and somatosensory processing: aneuropsychological perspective." Philosophical Transactions B 370(1663): 1401-1409.
  • Sutton, M. Q. and Anderson, E. N. (2010). Introduction to Cultural Ecology. Lanham, Md.,AltaMira Press.
  • Stein, E. (1989). On the Problem of Empathy (The Collected Works of Edith Stein, Volume3). Washington, D.C., ICS Publications.
  • Solso, R. L. (1994). Cognition and the Visual Arts, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  • Snowden, R., et al. (2012). Basic Vision: an Introduction to Visual Perception Oxford,Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, A. (1759 / 2002). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, Camridge UniversityPress.
  • Skov, M. and O. Vartanian (2009). Neuroaesthetics. Amityville, N.Y., Baywood PublishingCompany.
  • Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. London, New York, Routledge.
  • Seeley, W. P. (2006). "Naturalizing aesthetics: art and the cognitive neuroscience of vision."Journal of Visual Art Practice Volume 5 Number 3.
  • Schulz, A. W. (2011). "Simulation, Simplicity, and Selection: An Evolutionary Perspective onHigh-Level Mindreading " Philosohpcal Studies 152(2): 271-285.
  • Ruse, M. (1996). Are Pictures Really Necessary? The Case of Sewll Wright's 'AdaptiveLandscpes'. Picturing Knowledge. B. S. Baigrie. Toronto, Buffalo, London, Universityof Toronto Press: 303-337.
  • Rizzolatti, G., et al. (1999). "Resonance behaviors and mirror neurons." Archives Italiennesde Biologie 137: 85-100.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and Narrative. Chicago, University Of Chicago Press.
  • Rao, C. R. (1997). Statistics and Truth: Putting Chance to Work. Singapore; River Edge, NJ,World Scientific.
  • Ramachandran, V. S. and W. Hirstein (1997). "Three laws of qualia." Journal ofConsciousness Studies 4(5-6): 429-458.
  • Radhakrishna), R. C. R. C. 혼돈과 질서의 만남: 확률법칙의 다리를 넘어(Statisticsand truth)
    나남 [2003]
  • Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective Computing, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press.
  • Perner, J. and T. Kuhberger (2005). Mental Simulation: Royal Road to Other Minds? OtherMinds: How Humans Bridge the Divide between Self and Others. B. Malle and S.D. Hodges. New York, The Guilford Press: 174-189.
  • Park, J. E. S. (2011). A Hermeneutic on Dislocation as Experience Creating a Borderland,Constructing a Hybrid Identity. New York, Lang, Peter, Publishing Inc. .
  • Paradiso 신경과학 뇌의 탐구 제3판
    Bear, B. W. C. Mark F. Michael A. 바이오메디북 [2009]
  • Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA, MITPress.
  • Onians, J. (2007). Neuroarthistory. New Haven, London, Yale University Press.
  • O'Bryan, C. J. (2005). Carnal Art: Orlan's Refacing. Minneapolis, University of MinnesotaPress.
  • Northoff, G., et al. (2006). "Self-referential processing in our brain?A meta-analysis ofimaging studies on the self." NeuroImage 31(20060515): 440-457.
  • Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. NewYork, Rizzoli.
  • Newcombe, N. and J. Huttenlocher (2000). Making space: the Development of SpatialRepresentation and Reasoning Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  • Nagel, T. (Oct, 1974). "What is it like to be a bat?" The Philosophical Review 83(4): 435-450.
  • Munster, A. (2006). Materializing New Media: Embodiment in Information Aesthetics(Interfaces: Studies in Visual Culture), Dartmouth.
  • Moles, A. A. (1966). Information theory and esthetic perception. Urbana, University ofIllinois Press.
  • Mischler, I., James J. (2013). Metaphor across Time and Conceptual Space: The interplay ofembodiment and cultural models, John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Michael F. Land, B. W. T. (2009). Looking and acting vision and eye movements in naturalbehaviour. Oxford; New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Melzack, R. and P. D. Wall (1965). "Pain mechanism: a new theory." Science 150(3699):971-979.
  • Meltzoff, A. N. (2011). Social Cognition and the Origins of Imitation, Empathy, and Theoryof Mind. The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development U.Goswami. Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell: 49-75.
  • McEvilley, T. (2005). The Triumph of Anti-Art, McPherson & Company,.
  • Matuk, C. (2006). "Seeing the Body: The Divergence of Ancient Chinese and WesternMedical Illustration." The Journal of Biocommunication Vol. 32(No. 1).
  • Martinez, L. M. and J.-M. Alonso (2003). "Complex Receptive Fields in Primary VisualCortex." Neuroscientists 9(5): 317-331.
  • Mahner, M. and M. Bunge (1997). Foundations of Biophilosophy. Berlin, New York,Springer.
  • M. Johnson 몸의 철학: 신체화된 마음의 서구 사상에 대한 도전
    Lakoff, G. 박이정 [2002]
  • M. Blakeslee 뇌 속의 신체지도
    Blakeslee, S. 이다미디어 [2011]
  • Linden, E. (2000). The Parrot's Lament: and Other True Tales of Animal Intrigue,Intelligence and Ingenuity. New York, London, Plume.
  • Ligozat, G. (2013). Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Reasoning. Hoboken, Wiley.
  • Kim, J. (2010). Emergence: Core Ideas and Issues. Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind.Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Kemp, M. (2006). Leonardo da Vinci: The Marvellous Works of Nature and Man. Oxford,New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The Self-organization of Brain and Behavior,Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.
  • Kanai, R. and N. Tsuchiya (2012). "Qualia." Current Biology 22(10): 392-396.
  • James, W. (1976). Essays in Radical Empiricism. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard UniversityPress.
  • Jackson, F. (1982). "Epiphenamenal Qualia." The Philosophical Quaterly 32(127): 127-136.
  • Iacoboni, M. (2009). Mirroring people: the Science of Empathy and How We Connect withOthers. New York, N.Y., Picador.
  • Hutto, D. Starting without Theory. Other Minds: How Humans Bridge the Divide betweenSelf and Others. B. Malle and S. D. Hodges. New York, The Guilford Press: 56-72.
  • Hutto, D. (2002). The World is Not Enough: Shared Emotions and Other Minds130Understanding Emotions: Mind and Morals. P. Goldie. Aldershot, UK, AshgatePublishing: 37-54.
  • Husserl, E. (2014). Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy: FirstBook: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, Hackett Publishing Company.
  • Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomelogy and to a PhenomenologicalPhilosophy: Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. KluwerAcademic Publishers.
  • Hurley, S. and N. Chater, Eds. (2005). Perspective on Imitation: From Neuroscience toSocial Science. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  • Hurley, S. (2008). "The Shared Circuits Model(SCM): How Control, Mirroring, andSimulation Can Enable Imitation, Deliberation, and Mindreading." The Behavioraland Brain Science 31(1): 1-22.
  • Hume, D. (1739 / 1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Hubel, D. H. and T. Wiesel (2004). Brain and Visual Perception: The Story of a 25-YearCollaboration, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Hofstadter, D. (1979). Godel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid. New York, BasicBooks.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1807/1931). The Phenomenology of Mind. New York, Macmillan Co.
  • Hauser, M. (2001). Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think. New York, Henry Holt.
  • Harre?, R. (1993). Laws of Nature. London: Duckworth; Newburyport MA, Distributed inUSA by Focus Information Group.
  • Gulick, R. v. (2001). "Reduction, emergence and other recent options on the mind-bodyproblem: a philosophic overview." Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 1-34.
  • Grusin 재매개: 뉴미디어의 계보학 (Remediation :understanding new media). 서울
    Bolter, J. D. R. A 커뮤니케이션북스 [2006]
  • Gregory, R. L. (1994). Even Odder Perceptions. London; New York, Routledge.
  • Gordon, R. (1986). "Folk Psychology as Simulation." Mind and Language 1: 158-171.
  • Goethe, J. W. v. (1810/1971). Goethe's Color Theory. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, HoughtonMifflin.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston, HoughtonMifflin.
  • Gazzaninga, M., et al. (2010). Psychological Science. New York, W.W. Norton & Company,Inc.
  • Ganguly, D., et al. (2010). "A Cognitive Study on Medical Imaging" International Journal ofBio-Science and Bio-Technology Vol. 2(No. 3): 1-18.
  • Franke, H. W. (1971). Computer Graphics, Computer Art. London, New York, Phaidon.
  • Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York, Crowell.
  • Fishwick, P. (2002). "RUBE: An XML-Based Architecture for 3D Process Modeling andModel Fusion." Proceedings- SPIE THE International Society for OpticalEngineering 4716: 330-335.
  • Fisher, J. C. (2006). "Does Simulation Theory Really Involve Simulation?" PhilosophicalPsychology 19(4): 417-432.
  • Fink, G. R., et al. (1997). "Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and localaspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli." Brain 120: 1779-1791.
  • Feagin, S. L. (2011). Empathizing as Simulating. In A. Coplan & P. Goldie (Eds.), Empathy:Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 149-161). Oxford, NewYork:128Oxford University Press.
  • Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and theMind's Hidden Complexities. New York, Basic Books.
  • Elkins, J. (1999). Pictures of the Body: Pain and Metamorphosis, Stanford University Press.
  • Duve, T. d. (1996). Kant after Duchamp. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  • Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston, Little, Brown, and Company.
  • Decety, J. and A. N. Meltzoff (2011). Empathy, Imitation, and the Social Brain. Empathy:Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives A. Coplan and P. Goldie. Oxford,Oxford University Press: 58-95.
  • DeFusco, C. R. (2005). The Possibility of Phenamenal Consciousness in Non-LingusticAnimals, The Temple University. Ph D.
  • Darnell, J., et al. (1990). Molecular Cell Biology New York, Scientific American Books.
  • D. Zahavi , 2013). 현상학적 마음(The Phenomenological Mind)
    Gallagher, S. 도서출판b [2008]
  • Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the Observer: on Vision and Modernity in the NineteenthCentury. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  • Cox, D. (2008). Metaphoric mappings: the art of visualization. Aesthetic Computing. P. A.Fishwick. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press: 89-114.
  • Corning, P. A. (2002). "The Re-Emergence of "Emergence": A Venerable Concept in Searchof a Theory." Complexity 7(6): 18-30.
  • Corl, F. M., et al. (2000). "Role of Computer Technology in Medical Illustration." AmericanJournal of Roentgenology 175(6): 1519-1524.
  • Coplan, A. and P. Goldie (2011). Introduction. Empathy: Philosophical and PsychologicalPerspectives. New York, Oxford University Press: XII-XIII.
  • Cooke, B. (1999). Biopoetics: The New Synthesis. Biopetics: Evolutionary Explorations inthe Arts, Paragon House: 3-46.
  • Committee on Information Technology and Creativity, N. R. C. (2003). BeyondProductivity: Information, Technology, Innovation, and Creativity, NationalAcademies Press.
  • Clancey, W. J. (1993). "Situated action: A neuropsychological interpretation (response toVera and Simon)." Cognitive Science 17(1): 87-107.
  • Chalmers, D. (1995). "Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness." Toward a Science ofConsciousness 1: 1-4.
  • Buss, D. M. (2007). Evolutionary Psychology: the New Science of the Mind, Pearson.
  • Bunge, M. (2003). Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity ofKnowledge. Toronto: Buffalo, University of Toronto Press.
  • Bullough, E. (1972). "Psychological Distance." The British Journal of Psychology (5): 93.
  • Bruce, V., et al. (2003). Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology. London,Psychology Press.
  • Brecht, B. (1964). Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, Hill and Wang.
  • Brachman, R. J. and H. J. Levesque (2004). Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.Amsterdam ; Boston, Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Bolter, J. and D. Gromala (2003). Windows and Mirrors: Interaction Design, Digital Art,and the Myth of Transparency. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  • Bolter, J. D. and R. Grusin (1999). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge,Mass., MIT Press.
  • Bolter, J. D. and D. Gromala (2006). Transparency and reflectivity: digital art and theaesthetics of interface design. Aesthetic Computing. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press:369-382.
  • Blakeslee, S. and M. Blakeslee (2007). The Body has a Mind of its Own: New Discoveriesabout How the Mind-Body Connection Helps Us Master the World. New York,Random House.
  • Birkhoff, G. D. (1933). Aesthetic Measure, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
  • Bimber, O. (2005). Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. Wellesley,Mass., A K Peters.
  • Biggs, S. (2007). "The Phenomenal Mindreader: a Case for Phenomenal Simulation."Philosophical Psychology 20(1): 29-42.
  • Bergson, H.-L. (1944). Creative Evolution. New York, The Modern Library New York.
  • Bergson, H. L. (1912). Matter and Memory. New York, Macmillan Co.
  • Benjamin, W. (1989). Reflections. New York, Schocken Books.
  • Beer, R. (2003). "The Dynamics of Active Categorical Perception in an Evolved ModelAgent." Adaptive Behavior 11: 209-243.
  • Alvin Goldman, F. d. V. (March 2009). "Is social cognition embodied?" Trends in CognitiveScience 14(4).
  • Alais, D. and R. Blake (2005). Binocular Rivalry. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  • A. Gomila and P. Calvo (2008). Directions for an embodied cognitive science: Toward anintegrated approach. Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach. P.Calvo and A. Gomila. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 12-13.
  • 2009). 존재와 무(L' Etre et le neant)
    Sartre, J. P. 동서문화사 [1943]