초임 과학영재 교사의 수업 전문성 향상을 위한 코티칭과 멘토링 활용 전략의 개발과 적용 = Development and Application of the Strategy with Coteaching and Mentoring to Improve the Teaching Professionalism of Beginning Teachers in Science-Gifted Education

양찬호 양찬호 2015년

활용도
공유도
영향력

논문상세정보

- 저자 양찬호 양찬호
- 기타서명 Development and application of the strategy with coteaching and mentoring to improve the teaching professionalism of beginning teachers in science-gifted education
- 형태사항 삽화: 26 cm: ⅹ, 191 p.
- 일반주기 참고문헌 수록
- 학위논문사항 과학교육과, 학위논문 (박사)-, 서울대학교 대학원, 2015. 2
- DDC 22, 507
- 발행지 서울
- 언어 kor
- 출판년 2015
- 발행사항 서울대학교 대학원
- 주제어 과학영재교육 교과교육학 지식 멘토링 수업전문성 초임교사 코티칭
- 참고문헌( 249)
유사주제 논문( 655)

인용/피인용

초임 과학영재 교사의 수업 전문성 향상을 위한 코티 ...

' 초임 과학영재 교사의 수업 전문성 향상을 위한 코티칭과 멘토링 활용 전략의 개발과 적용 = Development and Application of the Strategy with Coteaching and Mentoring to Improve the Teaching Professionalism of Beginning Teachers in Science-Gifted Education' 의 주제별 논문영향력

논문영향력 요약
동일주제 총논문수	논문피인용 총횟수	주제별 논문영향력의 평균
주제	과학영재교육 교과교육학 지식 멘토링 수업전문성 초임교사 코티칭
661	1	0.0%

논문영향력
주제		주제별 논문수	주제별 피인용횟수	주제별 논문영향력
주제어	과학영재교육	40	0	0.0%
	교과교육학 지식	36	0	0.0%
	멘토링	259	0	0.0%
	수업전문성	210	0	0.0%
	초임교사	93	0	0.0%
	코티칭	23	0	0.0%
계		661	0	0.0%
* 다른 주제어 보유 논문에서 피인용된 횟수			1

' 초임 과학영재 교사의 수업 전문성 향상을 위한 코티칭과 멘토링 활용 전략의 개발과 적용 = Development and Application of the Strategy with Coteaching and Mentoring to Improve the Teaching Professionalism of Beginning Teachers in Science-Gifted Education' 의 참고문헌

협력적 멘토링을 통한 초임 중등과학교사의 교수실행에서 나타나는 반성적 실천의 변화
고문숙 남정희 한국과학교육학회지, 33(1), 94-113 [2013]
현직 교사 수업 코티칭: 초임 과학 교사 교육 방안
한재영 교사교육연구,49(3), 241-255 [2010]
코티칭을 통한 초임 과학영재교육 담당교사의 수업 전문성 변화에 관한 사례연구
강훈식 김영훈 노태희 양찬호 한국과학교육학회지, 32(4), 655-670 [2012]
코티칭에 나타난 의사소통 과정 분석
노태희 윤지현 한재영 한국과학교육학회지, 28(2), 159-168 [2008]
코티칭 수업에 대한 예비교사들의 인식
Han, Jae-Young 한재영 대한화학회지, 52(4),404-411 [2008]
초임 중등 과학 교사의 수업에서 과학 내용의 전개 방식과 내용 이해 전략
김찬종 ( Chan Jong Kim ) 안유민 ( Yu Min Ahn ) 최승언 ( Seung Um Choe ) 한국과학교육학회지, 26(6), 691-702 [2006]
초임 과학교사의 반성적 실천을 위한 협력적 멘토링의 효과
고문숙 ( Mun Suk Go ) 남정희 ( Jeong Hee Nam ) 이순덕 ( Soon Duk Lee ) 최정희 ( Jeong Hee Choi ) 한국과학교육학회지, 29(5), 564-579 [2009]
초임 과학교사 지원을 위한 멘토링의 효율성 연구
곽영순 한국과학교육학회지, 31(1), 1-13 [2011]
초등학교 영재교육 담당 교사의 교사 전문성에 대한 인식과실행 수준 분석
강충열 윤미라 초등교육학연구, 16(2), 103-123 [2009]
초등학교 과학 협동학습에서 영재 학생과 일반 학생의 언어적 상호작용 비교
여상인 임숙영 임희준 초등과학교육, 24(5), 595-601 [2005]
초등교사의 실천적 지식 변화에 대한 사례 연구: 과학영재수업을 중심으로
류인숙 정정인 영재교육연구, 20(1), 317-346 [2010]
초등교사의 구성주의적 과학 평가관 및 관련 변인탐색
강석진 노태희 윤지현 초등과학교육, 28(3), 352-360 [2009]
초등과학영재교육에 대한 교사 학부모 학생의 인식에 관한연구
손영완 최도성 초등교육연구, 24(2), 68-93 [2010]
초등과학 영재학급 담당 교사의 영재 교육에 대한 인식 조사
최선영 ( Sun Young Choi ) 초등과학교육, 26(3), 252-259 [2007]
초등과학 영재교육의 방향과 과제
권치순 초등과학교육, 24(2), 192-201 [2005]
초등과학 영재교육 학습평가 기준 및 도구 개발
남미애 경인교육대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 [2010]
초등 예비 교사들이 과학 수업 시연 계획 및 실행에서 고려하는 교과교육학지식 요소
노태희 ( Taehee Noh ) 김지영 ( Ji Yeong Kim ) 윤지현 ( Ji Hyun Yoon ) 임희준 ( Hee Jun Lim ) 초등과학교육, 29(3), 350-363 [2010]
초등 과학영재수업에서 코티칭의 활용에 대한 사례 연구
강훈식 정금순 한국과학교육학회지, 31(2), 239-255 [2011]
초등 과학영재교육에서 코티칭 과학수업이 학생들의 개념 적용 능력과 수업에 대한 인식에 미치는 효과
강훈식 임아름 한국과학교육학회지, 32(4),641-654 [2012]
지역 영재교육원 과학영재교육 담당 교사의 영재교육에 대한 인식 조사
김현섭 심규철 한국생물교육학회지, 34(4), 479-484 [2006]
중학교 일반학급과 영재학급의 과학수업에서 교사와 학생사이의 언어적 상호작용 비교 분석
김동진 박국태 박세열 백인환 이지향 황현숙 영재교육연구, 20(3), 721-741 [2010]
중학교 과학영재교육 교사 전문성에 대한 질적 연구
박경희 서혜애 교사교육연구, 49(2), 171-193 [2010]
중학교 과학영재 담당교사의 수업전략 특징 분석
김선경 ( Sun Kyoung Kim ) 백성혜 한국과학교육학회지, 31(2), 295-313 [2011]
중학교 과학영재 담당교사의 PCK 요소의 특징과 관련성
김선경 민희정 방은정 백성혜 영재교육연구, 21(4), 801-828 [2011]
중등교육과 교사의 수업전문성
노명완 한국교사교육, 18(1), 45-68 [2001]
중등과학영재교육에서 초임 교사의 수업 전문성 제고 전략으로써의 멘토링 적용 사례연구
강석주 ( Seok Joo Kang ) 강훈식 ( Hun Sik Kang ) 노태희 ( Tae Hee Noh ) 한국과학교육학회지, 32(2),331-345 [2012]
중등 초임 과학영재교육 담당교사의 코티칭 과정에서 나타나는 과학 수업 반성의 특징 분석
강훈식 ( Hun Sik Kang ) 양찬호 ( Chan Ho Yang ) 한국과학교육학회지, 33(2), 373-389 [2013]
중등 초임 과학교사의 수업 전문성 개발 실태 분석
곽영순 한국지구과학회지, 30(3), 354-365 [2009]
중등 영재 판별과 교육 프로그램의 비판적 검토
최호성 영재교육연구, 13(4),1-28 [2003]
중등 과학영재 지도교사의 수업 전문성에 관한 사례연구
김희백 ( Heui Baik Kim ) 배미정 ( Mi Jung Pae ) 한국과학교육학회지, 30(4), 412-428 [2010]
중등 과학에서의 코티칭 수업 과정 분석
윤지현 한재영 과학교육연구지,33(1), 152-163 [2009]
중등 과학 예비교사들의 수업시연 계획 및실행에서 나타난 교과교육학지식의 요소
김경순 노태희 박지애 윤지현 한국과학교육학회지, 31(1), 99-114 [2011]
제1차 영재교육진흥종합계획 평가 및 중장기 전망에 관한 연구. 수탁연구 CR 2007
김미숙 김언주 맹희주 이상천 이정규 이희권 한수연 서울: 한국교육개발원 [2007]
정애란 구성주의적 수업을 위한 워크숍에 참여한 중등 과학 교사의 교수 지향과 수업 실행
김찬종 맹승호 오필석 이선경 정득실 한국과학교육학회지, 27(5), 432-446 [2007]
이주석, 강훈식 중등 과학영재교육 담당교사의 전문성 향상을 위한멘토링 프로그램에 대한 교사들의 요구 분석
노태희 한국과학교육학회지, 31(6),970-985 [2011]
유치원 초임교사를 위한 멘토링 과정
홍은경 중앙대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2003]
예비 교사 교육 방안으로서 코티칭의 유용성
노태희 윤지현 한재영 한국교원교육연구, 25(1), 117-136 [2008]
영재교육학 원론
박성익 서울: 교육과학사 [2003]
영재교육의 이론과 실제
이해명 서울: 교육과학사 [2006]
영재교육기관의 교수,학습실태 분석: 중학생 대상 과학영재교육
서혜애 ( Hae Ae Seo ) 이윤호 ( Yoon Ho Lee ) 중등교육연구, 51(2), 69-86 [2003]
영재교육기관 교수 학습 실태 분석. 수탁연구 CR 2003-26
서혜애 손연아 서울: 한국교육개발원 [2003]
영재교육 담당교사의 자질 향상 및 전문성 개발에 관한 연구
강경석 장영숙 영재교육연구, 9(2), 1-22 [1999]
영재교육 담당 교원 양성 및 임용 방안 연구. 수탁연구 CR 2000-16
김홍원 박주상 이윤식 조석희 서울: 한국교육개발원 [2000]
영재교육 교사연수의 교사 전문성 신장에 대한 구조방정식모형
박경희 서혜애 영재교육연구, 17(3), 421-442 [2007]
영재교육 교사 전문성의 구성요소 탐색 연구
박경희 서혜애 영재교육연구,17(1), 77-98 [2007]
영재교육 강화 사업성과 지표 평가 연구. 수탁연구 CR 2005-59
김미숙 서혜애 서울: 한국교육개발원 [2005]
영재교사 연수 프로그램 평가 및 교사 요구 분석
권민경 유미현 과학영재교육, 5(2), 105-119 [2013]
신임 과학교사의 교과교육학 지식(PCK)의발달에 관한 사례연구
고미례 ( Mi Re Ko ) 남정희 ( Jeong Hee Nam ) 임재항 ( Jai Hang Lim ) 한국과학교육학회지, 29(1), 54-67 [2009]
신규교사 멘토링 경험에 대한 초임교사의 인식 연구
신붕섭 교육종합연구,10(2), 231-255 [2012]
수업에 대한 멘토링이 초임화학교사의 교수실행에미치는 영향
박현주 성숙경 정대홍 한국과학교육학회지, 31(8), 1055-1076 [2011]
미국에서 초임교사 멘토링의 실제와 시사점
신붕섭 교육행정학연구, 23(4),103-128 [2005]
멘토링을 통한 코티칭이 초임 과학영재교육 담당교사들의 수업 전문성에 미치는 영향
강훈식 노태희 양찬호 유지연 이재원 한국과학교육학회지,33(5), 1021-1040 [2013]
멘토링을 통한 초임 중등과학교사의 탐구지향적 교수실행 변화
고문숙 ( Mun Suk Go ) 고미례 ( Mi Re Ko ) 김현옥 ( Hyun Ok Kim ) 남정희 ( Jeong Hee Nam ) 한국과학교육학회지, 30(5), 544-556 [2010]
멘토링을 통한 초임 과학영재교육 담당교사들의PCK 측면에서의 수업 전문성 변화에 대한 사례연구
강훈식 노태희 이주석 한국과학교육학회지,32(7), 1187-1203 [2012]
멘토링을 통한 초등 예비교사의 과학 PCK의특징 및 멘토링에 대한 인식 고찰
노태희 박지애 윤지현 임희준 초등과학교육, 31(1), 99-108 [2012]
멘토링을 통한 예비화학교사들의 Pedagogical ContentKnowledge 변화
민희정 ( Hee Jung Min ) 백성혜 ( Seoung Hey Paik ) 원정애 ( Jeong Ae Won ) 이송연 ( Song Yeon Lee ) 한국과학교육학회지, 31(4), 621-640 [2011]
박사

멘토링을 통한 수업 시연 준비 과정에서 나타나는 중등 과학 예비교사들의 교수학적 내용 지식(PCK) 요소 분석
윤지현 윤지현 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2011]
멘토링에 대한 초등 초임교사의 인식
김종미 초등교육연구, 22(4), 301-326 [2009]
멘토링 전후의 초임 과학교사의 수업 특징 변화
곽영순 한국지구과학회지,31(4), 403-417 [2010]
동료간 상호작용이 강조된 연수 프로그램에서 과학영재 담당교사의 상호작용 분석
박지은 이봉우 초등과학교육, 31(2), 135-145 [2012]
교육청 영재 교육원 과학 담당 교사들의 영재성에 대한 인식
박선자 이현주 최경희 학습자중심교과교육연구, 9(2), 119-137 [2009]
교육인적자원부 제 2차 영재교육진흥종합계획(’08-’12)
서울: 교육인적자원부 [2007]
교육과정 개정에 따른 과학과 내용교수지식(PCK) 연구. 연구보고 RRI 2007-3-3
곽영순 최승현 서울: 한국교육과정평가원 [2007]
교원 '전문성'과 '질'의 개념 및 개선전략 탐색
김혜숙 교육학연구, 41(2),93-114 [2003]
교사들의 과학 교과교육학 지식 측정도구 개발
박성혜 한국교원교육연구,20(1), 105-134 [2003]
교과별 내용교수지식(PCK) 연구(II) - 중등 초임 교사 수업컨설팅을 중심으로. 연구보고 RRI 2008-3
강대현 곽영순 장경숙 최승현 서울: 한국교육과정평가원 [2008]
과학적 창의성 지도를 위한 워크숍 방식의심화 연수 프로그램의 개발과 적용
김본경 박종원 지경준 최재혁 한국과학교육학회지, 30(8), 1017-1030 [2010]
과학적 창의성 모델의 제안-인지적 측면을 중심으로-.
박종원 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 375-386 [2004]
과학영재학교 교육프로그램에 대한 학생 및 교사의 인식 분석
박경희 서혜애 교육과정연구, 23(3), 159-185 [2005]
과학영재학교 교수활동에 관한 학생인식 및 과학수업에서 상호작용 유형
박수경 한국지구과학회지, 26(1), 30-40 [2005]
과학영재학교 과학교사들의 영재교육에 대한 신념과 교수활동 유형
권병두 김경진 김찬종 최승언 한국과학교육학회지, 25(4), 514-525 [2005]
과학영재교육원 운영에 대한 서울시과학영재교육원교사들의 고려사항
강경희 김득호 박현주 한국과학교육학회지, 29(1), 90-105 [2009]
과학영재교육에서 초임 교사들의 PCK 측면에서의 수업 전문성에 대한 사례연구
강훈식 김영훈 노태희 양찬호 한국과학교육학회지, 31(8), 1214-1228 [2011]
과학영재교육에서 교사들이 겪는 어려움
손정우 이봉우 이인호 전영석 최원호 최정훈 초등과학교육, 27(3), 252-260 [2008]
과학영재교육 담당교원의 전문성 개발에 관한 연구
강호감 최선영 경인교육대학교 과학교육논총, 16, 137-160 [2004]
과학영재교육 교사 교수방법 전문지식의 수준 분석
박경희 박지은 서혜애 교과교육학연구, 11(1), 1-14 [2007]
과학영재교육 교사 교수방법 전문지식 측정도구 개발
박경희 서혜애 한국교원교육연구, 22(2), 159-180 [2005]
과학영재교육 관련 국내 연구 동향
강경희 한국과학교육학회지, 30(1),54-67 [2010]
박사

과학영재 담당교사의 프로그램 개발 전문성 신장을 위한 동료간 상호작용이 강조된 연수과정 개발 및 적용
박지은 단국대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2011]
과학영재 담당교사의 과학영재교육에 대한 인식 및 현황 조사연구
전미란(Miran Chun) 정기영(Kiyoung Chung) 최승언(Seung-Urn Choe) 영재와 영재교육, 7(2), 161-177 [2008]
과학교육론
권재술 서울: 교육과학사 [1998]
과학교사의 학생평가 실태분석 및 교사연수를 통한 평가전문성 모델 개발
민희정 한국교원대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 [2012]
과학교사교육을 위한 멘토링 프로그램 모델 개발
고문숙 고미례 남정희 성화목 이순덕 한국과학교육학회지, 32(10), 1613-1626 [2012]
과학교사 교수내용지식(PCK)의 재구성과 적용 방법
고영자 조희형 한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), 618-632 [2008]
과학 영재교육 담당교사의 영재교육 전문성에 대한 인식
박지은 이봉우 교과교육학연구, 16(2), 587-601 [2012]
과학 영재교육 교사 연수에서 교수내용지식을 활용한 교수 전략의 개발과 적용
손정우 이봉우 이인호 최원호 최정훈 초등과학교육, 28(1), 9-23 [2009]
과학 교사의 교수내용지식과 실천적 지식에 관한 연구 관점 고찰
김찬종 김혜리 김희백 오필석 이경호 이선경 한국교원교육연구, 26(1), 27-57 [2009]
고등학교급 영재교육기관의 교육과정의 비교 및 발전방안
김현철 이정규 영재와 영재교육, 6(1), 5-22 [2007]
Whitton, D. (1997). Regular classroom practices with gifted students in grades 3and 4 in New South Wales, Australia. Gifted Education International, 12(1),34-38.
Wenglingsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters. Princeton, NJ: Educational TestingService, Policy Information Centre.
Wang, J., & Odell, S. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according tostandards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research,72(3), 481-546.
Wallace, C., & Kang, N. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary scienceteachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936-960.
Volkmann, M. J., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Creating professional identity:Dilemmas and metaphors of a first-year chemistry teacher. ScienceEducation, 82(3), 293-310.
Villa, R. A., Thousand, J. S., & Nevin, A. I. (2008). A guide to coteaching:Practical tips for facilitating student learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies.Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4).
Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Comprehensive curriculum forgifted learners (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2002). Curriculum planning and instructional design forgifted learners. Denver, CO: Love.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. 영재교육 교원 전문성 계발 연구. 수탁연구 CR 2005-38
박경희 서혜애 서울: 한국교육개발원 [2005]
Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers'pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,35(6), 673-695.
Valencic Zuljan, M., & Vogrinc, J. (2007). A mentor’s aid in developing thecompetences of teacher trainees. Educational Studies, 33(4), 373-384.
Tomlinson, P. (1995). Understanding mentoring: Reflective strategies forschool-based teacher preparation. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tobin, K., Zurbano, R., Ford, A., & Carambo, C. (2003). Learning to teach throughcoteaching and cogenerative dialogue. Cybernetics and Human Knowing,10(2), 51-73.
Tobin, K., Roth, W.-M., & Zimmermann, A. (2001). Learning to teach science inurban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 941-964.
Tobin, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Teaching to learn: A view from the field.Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Tobin, K. (2006). Learning to teach through coteaching and cogenerative dialogue.Teaching Education, 17(2), 133-142.
Teacher Quality Enhancement Center (2010). Benefits of co-teaching. St. Cloud,MN: St. Cloud State University. http://www.stcloudstate.edu/soe/coteaching/benefits.asp
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques andprocedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stanulis, R. N., Little, S., & Wibbens, E. (2012). Intensive mentoring thatcontributes to change in beginning elementary teachers’ learning to leadclassroom discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 32-43.
Stanulis, R. N., & Weaver, D. (1998). Teacher as mentor, teacher as learner. TheTeacher Educator, 34(2), 134-143.
Stanulis, R. N., & Floden, R. E. (2009). Intensive mentoring as a way to helpbeginning teachers development balanced instruction. Journal of TeacherEducation, 60(2), 112-122.
Stansbury, K., & Zimmerman, J. (2000). Lifelines to the classroom: Designingsupport for beginning teachers. San Francisco, CA: WestED.
Smith, T., & Ingersoll, R. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoringon beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal,41(3), 681-714.
Siry, C. A. (2011). Emphasizing collaborative practices in learning to teach:Coteaching and cogenerative dialogue in a field-based methods course.Teaching Education, 22(1), 91-101.
Simpson, T., Hastings, W., & Hill, B. (2007). I knew that she was watching me:The professional benefits of mentoring. Teachers and Teaching: Theory andPractice, 13(5), 481-498.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-21.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2) : 4-14.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching ininclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. ExceptionalChildren, 73(4), 392-416.
Schwarz, C. V., Gunckel, K. L., Smith, E. L., Covitt, B. A., Bae, M., Enfield, M., &Tsurusaki, B. (2008). Helping elementary preservice teachers learn to usecurriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education,92(2), 345-377.
Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Schmidt, M. (2008). Mentoring and being mentored: The story of a novice musicteacher’s success. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 635-648.
Scantlebury, K., Gallo-Foxa, J., & Wassell, B. (2008). Coteaching as a model forpreservice secondary science teacher education. Teaching and TeacherEducation, 24(4), 967-981.
Scantlebury, K. (2005). Gender issues in coteaching. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin(Eds.), Teaching together, learning together (pp. 233.248). New York: PeterLang.
Rowley, J. (2005). Mentor teachers as instructional coaches. In H. Portner (Ed.),Teacher mentoring and induction (pp. 109-127). Thousand Oaks, CA. CorwinPress.
Roth, W.-M., Masciotra, D., & Boyd, N. (1999). Becoming-in-the-classroom: A casestudy of teacher development through coteaching. Teaching and TeacherEducation, 15(7), 771-784.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2005). Coteaching: From praxis to theory. In W.-M.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2002). At the elbow of another: Learning to teach bycoteaching. New York: Peter Lang.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2001). The implications of coteaching/cogenerativedialogue for teacher evaluation: Learning from multiple perspectives ofeveryday practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(1), 7-29.
Roth, W.-M., & Boyd, N. (1999). Coteaching, as colearning, is praxis. Research inScience Education, 29(1), 51-67.
Roth W.-M., Tobin, K., Carambo, C., & Dalland, C. (2005). Coordination incoteaching: Producing alignment in real time. Science Education, 89(4),675-702.
Roth W.-M., Tobin, K., Carambo, C., & Dalland, C. (2004). Coteaching: Creatingresources for learning and learning to teach chemistry in urban highschools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 882-904.
Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Teaching together, learning together (pp. 5-26).New York: Peter Lang.
Roehrig, A. D., Bohn, C. M., Turner, J. E., & Pressley, M. (2008). Mentoringbeginning primary teachers for exemplary teaching practices. Teaching andTeacher Education, 24(3), 684-702.
Roberts, J. L. (2008). Teachers of the gifted and talented. In F. A. Karnes & K.
Rippon, J. H., & Martin, M. (2006). What makes a good induction supporter?Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 84-99.
Rigden, D. (2000). Implications of standards for teacher preparation. BasicEducation, 45(3), 1-6.
Rice, N., Drame, E., Owen, L., & Frattura, E. M. (2007). Co-instructing at thesecondary level. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(6), 12-18.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use ofmathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
Reis, A., & Westberg, K. (1994). The impact of staff development on teachers’ability to modify curriculum for gifted and talented students. Gifted ChildQuarterly, 38(3), 127-135.
Reiman, A. J., & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1998). Mentoring and supervision for teacherdevelopment. NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Rajuan, M., Douwe, B., & Verloop, N. (2007). The role of the cooperating teacher:Bridging the gap between the expectations of cooperating teachers andstudent teachers. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(3),223-242.
R. Stephens (Eds.), Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented(pp. 246-261). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Porter, A. C., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessmentsand their uses. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(pp. 259-297). Washington, DC.: AERA.
Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. L. (2001). Defining, developing, and using curriculumindicators: Consortium for policy research in education (Report # RR-048),University of Pennsylvania.
Peterson, B. E., & Williams, S. R. (1998). Mentoring beginning teachers,Mathematics Teacher, 91(8), 730-734.
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2009). The translation of teachers’ understanding ofgifted students into instructional strategies for teaching science. Journal ofScience Teacher Education, 20(4), 333-351.
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogicalcontent knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachersas professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284.
Park, S., & Chen, Y.-C. (2011). Mapping out the integration of the components ofpedagogical content knowledge for teaching photosynthesis and heredity.
Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of NationalAssociation for Research in Science Teaching, Caribe Royale, Orlando,Florida.
Oh, D. M., Ankers, A. M., Llamas, J. M., & Tomyoy, C. (2005). Impact ofpre-service student teaching experience on urban school teachers. Journalof Instructional Psychology, 32(1), 82-97.
Newman, J. L., & Hubner, J. P. (2012). Designing challenging science experiencesfor high-ability learners through partnerships with university professors.Gifted Child Today, 35(2), 102-115.
National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards.Washington, DC.: National Academy Press.
Murray, M. (2001). Beyond the myths and magic of mentoring. San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass.
Murphy, C., & Scantlebury, K. (2010). Coteaching in international contexts:Research and practice. London: Springer Publishing.
Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2005). Coteaching as an approach to enhance sciencelearning and teaching in primary schools. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.),Teaching together, learning together (pp. 207-231). New York, NY: PeterLang.
Moor, H., Halsey, K., Jones, M., Martin, K., Stott, A., Brown, C., & Harland, J.(2005). Professional development for teachers early in their careers: Anevaluation of the early professional development pilot scheme. Nottingham:Department for Education and Skills.
Milne, C., Scantlebury, K., Blonstein, J., & Gleason, S. (2011). Coteaching anddisturbances: Building a better system for learning to teach science.Research in Science Education, 41(3), 413-440.
McIntyre, D., & Hagger, H. (1996). Mentors in schools: Developing the professionof teaching. London: David Fulton.
Maynard, T. (2000). Learning to teach or learning to manage mentors?Experiences of school-based teacher training. Mentoring and Tutoring:Partnership in Learning, 8(1), 17-30.
Martin, S. N., & Scantlebury, K. (2009). More than a conversation: Usingcogenerative dialogues in the professional development of high schoolchemistry teachers. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability,21(2), 119-136.
Martin, S. N. (2007). Where practice and theory intersect in the chemistryclassroom: Using cogenerative dialogue to identify the critical point inscience education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 693-720.
Martin, M., & Rippon, J. (2003). Teacher induction: Personal intelligence and thementoring relationship. Journal of In-Service Education, 29(1), 141-162.
Marks,R.(1990).Pedagogicalcontentknowledge:From amathematicalcaseto a modifiedconception.JournalofTeacherEducation,41(3),3-11.
Marable, M., & Raimondi, S. (2007). Teachers’ perceptions of what was most (andleast) supportive during their first year of teaching. Mentoring andTutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(1), 25-37.
Malderez, A., Hobson, A. J., Tracey, L., & Kerr, K. (2007). Becoming a studentteacher: Core features of the experience. European Journal of TeacherEducation, 30(3), 225-248.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, source, and development ofpedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome &N. Lederman (Eds), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. MA: KluwerAcademic Publishers.
Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R. F., & Mulhall, P. (2001).Documenting science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge throughPaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31(2), 289-307.
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developingscience teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. AW Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Loughran, J. Mulhall,P. & Berry, A.(2004).In Search of Pedagogical ContentKnowledge in Science:Developing Ways ofArticulating and Documenting Professional Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(4),370-391.
Lord, P., Atkinson, M., & Mitchell, H. (2008). Mentoring and coaching forprofessionals: A study of the research evidence. National Foundation forEducational Research.
Lindgren, U. (2005). Experiences of beginning teachers in a school-basedmentoring programme Sweden. Educational Studies, 31(3), 251-263.
Leslie, K., Lingard, L., & Whyte, S. (2005). Junior faculty experiences withinformal mentoring. Medical Teacher, 27(8), 693-698.
Lee, E. (2007). Literature review: Pedagogical content knowledge as specializedknowledge for teaching. Journal of the Korea Association for ScienceEducation, 27(8), 699-710.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity,3(3), 149-164.
Landrum, M. S. (2001). Professional development. In M. S. Landrum, C. M.Callahan & B. D. Shaklee (Eds.), Aiming for excellence: Annotations to theNAGC pre-K-grade 12 gifted program standards. New York: Prufrock PressInc.
Kochan, F. K. (2002). Examining the organizational and human dimensions ofmentoring: A textual data analysis. In F. K. Kochan (Ed.), The organizationaland human dimensions of successful mentoring programs and relationships(pp. 269-286). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Koch, J., & Appleton, K. (2007). The effect of a mentoring model for elementaryscience professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education,18(2), 209-231.
Kluth, P., & Straut, D. (2003). Do as we say and as we do: Teaching andmodeling collaborative practice in the university classroom. Journal ofTeacher Education, 53(3), 228-240.
Kennedy, J., & Dorman, J. (2002). Development and validation of the extendedpracticum learning environment inventory. Sydney: Australian CatholicUniversity.
Jones, M. (2000). Trainee teachers’ perceptions of school-based training in Englandand Germany with regard to their preparation for teaching, mentor supportand assessment. Mentoring and Tutoring, 8(1), 63-80.
Hudson, P., & Skamp, K. (2003). Mentoring preservice teachers of primary science,The Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(1).
Hudson, P. (2004). Specific mentoring: A theory and model for developing primaryscience teaching practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2),139-146.
Hubball, H., Clarke, A., & Poole, G. (2010). Ten-year reflections on mentoringSoTL research in a research-intensive university. International Journal forAcademic Development, 15(2), 117-129.
Holloway, J. H. (2001). The benefits mentoring. Educational Leadership, 58(8),85-86.
Hobson, A. J., Malderez, A., Tracey, L., Homer, M., Mitchell, N., Biddulph, M., ...Tomlinson, P. D. (2007). Newly qualified teachers’ experiences of their firstyear of teaching: Findings from phase III of the becoming a teacherproject. Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2009). Mentoringbeginning teachers: What we know and what we don’t. Teaching andTeacher Education, 25(1), 207-216.
Hobson, A. J. (2002). Student teachers’ perceptions of school-based mentoring ininitial teacher training (ITT). Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership inLearning, 10(1), 5-20.
Heller, K. A. (2007). Scientific ability and creativity. High Ability Studies, 18(2),209-234.
Heilbronn, R., Jones, C., Bubb, S., & Totterdell, M. (2002). School-based inductiontutors - a challenging role. School Leadership and Management, 22(4),371-388.
Healy, C. C., & Welchert, A. J. (1990). Mentoring relations: A definition toadvance research and practice. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 17-21.
Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration ofpedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory andPractice, 11(3), 273-292.
Hascher, T., Cocard, Y., & Moser, P. (2004). Forget about theory - practice is all?Student teachers’ learning in practicum. Teachers and Teaching: Theoryand Practice, 10(6), 623-637.
Harrison, J., Dymoke, S., & Pell, T. (2006). Mentoring beginning teachers insecondary schools: An analysis of practice. Teaching and TeacherEducation, 22(8), 1055-1067.
Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrainedteachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Querterly, 38(3), 115-123.
Grossman, P.(1990). The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education. New York : Teachers College Press.
Graziano, K. J., & Navarrete, L. A. (2012). Co-teaching in a teacher educationclassroom: Collaboration, compromise, and creativity. Issues in TeacherEducation, 21(1), 109-126.
Gleason, S., Fennemore, M., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). Choreographing teaching:Coteaching with special education/inclusion teachers in science classrooms.In K. Tobin (Ed.), Teaching and learning science: A handbook (pp. 235-238).New York: Praeger Publishing.
Gilbert, J. K., & Newberry, M. (2007). The characteristics of the gifted andexceptionally able in science. In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education forgifted learners. NY: Routledge.
Geddis, A. N., Onslow, B., Beynon, C., & Oesch, J. (1993). Transforming contentknowledge: Learning to teach about isotopes. Science Education, 77(6),575-591.
Gately, S. E., & Gately, F. J. (2001). Understanding co-teaching components.Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4), 40-47.
Gargiulo, R. M., & Metcalf, D. (2010). Teaching in today’s inclusive classrooms: Auniversal design for learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L. M., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001).What makes professional development effective? Results from nationalsample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
Ganser, T. (2002). How teachers compare the roles of cooperating teacher andmentor, Educational Forum, 66(4), 380-385.
Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Unthinkable thoughts: Education of gifted students. GiftedChild Quarterly, 44(1), 5-11.
Fulton, K., & Britton, T. (2011). STEM teachers in professional learningcommunities: From good teachers to great teaching. Washington, DC.:National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2008). The development of preservice elementaryteachers’ curricular role identity for science teaching. Science Education,92(5), 909-940.
Fletcher, S. (2000). Mentoring in schools: A handbook of good practice. London:Taylor and Francis.
Fernandez-Balboa, J. M., & Stieh, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogicalcontent knowledge among college professors. Teaching and TeacherEducation, 11(3), 293-306.
Feldhusen, J. F., Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Seeley, K. (1989). Excellence ineducating the gifted. Denver, CO: Love.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. (1992). Mentoring in context: A comparison oftwo U.S. programs for beginning teachers. NCRTL Special Report. EastLansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1996). Teacher mentoring: A critical review. (ERIC DocumentReproduction Service No. ED 397 060)Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum tostrengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6),1013-1055.
Falk, A. (2012). Teachers learning from professional development in elementaryscience: Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogicalcontent knowledge. Science Education, 96(2), 265-290.
Eick, C. J., Ware, F., & Williams, P. (2003). Coteaching in a science methodcourse: A situated learning model of becoming a teacher. Journal ofTeacher Education, 54(1), 74-85.
Eick, C. J., Ware, F., & Jones, M. T. (2004). Coteaching in a secondary sciencemethods course: Learning through a coteaching model that supports earlyteacher practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(3), 197-209.
Eick, C. J., & Ware, F. N. (2005). Coteaching in a science methods course: Anapprenticeship model for early induction to the secondary classroom. InW.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Teaching together, learning together (pp.187-206). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Edwards, A., & Collison, J. (1996). Mentoring and developing practice in primaryschools: Supporting student teacher learning in schools. Buckingham: OpenUniversity Press.
Diana, T. J. (2014). Co-teaching: Enhancing the student teaching experience,Kappa Delta Pi Record, 50(2), 76-80.
Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002).Effects of professional development on teacher’s instruction: Results from athree-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,24(2), 81-112.
De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers'pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teachingchemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947-964.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2003). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.).Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S.(2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report onteacher development in the United States and abroad. National StaffDevelopment Council and The School Redesign Network at StanfordUniversity.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). Inequality and access to knowledge. In J. A. Banks &C. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp.465-483). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Crow, G. M. (2007). The professional and organizational socialization of newEnglish in school reform contexts. Educational Management, Administrationand Leadership, 35(1), 51-71.
Croft, L. J. (2003). Teachers of the gifted: Gifted teachers. In N. Clangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 558-571). Boston: Allyn& Bacon.
Crawford, B. A. (1999). The poisons prorject: Motivate your students withinquiry-based unit. Science Scope, 21(5), 18-21.
Cook, L., & Friend. M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effectivepractices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-16.
Cochran, K., DeRuiter, J., & King, R. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: Anintergrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education,44(4), 263-272.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.,pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chao, G. T., Walz, P. M., & Gardner, P. D. (1991). An exploration of mentorshipfunctions and outcomes: A cross-situational comparison. Paper presented atthe Sixth Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and OrganizationalPsychology, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri.
Carter, M., & Francis, R. (2001). Mentoring and beginning teachers’ workplacelearning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 249-262.
Carter, K. (1990). Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston(Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291-310). New York:Macmillan.
Carlsen, W. (1999). Domains of teacher knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 133-144).Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Callahan, C. M., & Reis, S. M. (2004). Program evaluation in gifted education(Essential readings in gifted education series). Thousand Oaks, CA: CorwinPress.
Bullough, R. V. (2005). Being and becoming a mentor: School-based teachereducators and teacher educator identity. Teaching and Teacher Education,21(2), 143-155.
Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use ofcurriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann & G. M.Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materialsand classroom instruction (pp. 17-36). NY: Routledge.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture oflearning. Educational Researcher, January-February, 32-42.
Briscoe, C., & Peters, J. (1997). Teacher collaboration across and within schools:Supporting individual change in elementary science teaching, ScienceTeacher Education, 81(1), 51-64.
Bradbury, L. U. (2010). Educative mentoring: Promoting reform-based scienceteaching through mentoring relationships. Science Education, 94(6),1049-1071.
Borgia, L. G. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge in project-based teaching.Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign.
Bishop, C. (2001). Case-based learning and the construction of professionalpractical knowledge in teacher education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,University of Sydney.
Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2012). Learning to critique and adapt sciencecurriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementaryteachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96(1), 130-157.
Bashan, B., & Holsblat, R. (2012). Co-teaching through modeling processes:Professional development of students and instructors in a teacher trainingprogram, Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(2), 207-226.
Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issuesrelated to the science apprenticeship camp, Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 38(1), 70-102.
Bacharach, N., Washut Heck, T., & Dahlberg, K. (2008). Co-teaching in highereducation. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 5(3), 9-16.
Bacharach, N., Heck, T. W., & Dahlberg, K. (2010). Changing the face of studentteaching through coteaching. Action in Teacher Education, 32(1), 3-14.
Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2005). Giving priority to evidence in scienceteaching: A first-year elementary teacher’s specialized practices andknowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 965-986.
Allen,D.D.,Cobb,J.B.,& Danger,S.(2003).Inservice teacher mentoring aspring teachers. Mentoring and Tutoring, 11(2), 177-182.
Abell, S. K., Dillon, D. R., Hopkins, C. J., McInerney, W. D., & O’ Brien, D. G.(1995). Somebody to count on: Mentor/intern relationships in a beginningteacher internship program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(2),173-188.
'교사 전문성'의 재개념화 방향 탐색을 위한 기초연구
소경희 교육과정연구,21(4), 77-96 [2003]

초임 과학영재 교사의 수업 전문성 향상을 위한 코티칭과 멘토링 활용 전략의 개발과 적용 = Development and Application of the Strategy with Coteaching and Mentoring to Improve the Teaching Professionalism of Beginning Teachers in Science-Gifted Education

유사주제 논문( 655)

주제별 논문영향력