연구동향 분석
박사

불완전경쟁 CGE모형을 이용한 한국 배출권 거래제의 경제효과 분석

박경원 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 불완전경쟁 CGE모형을 이용한 한국 배출권 거래제의 경제효과 분석' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 배출권 거래제
  • 불완전경쟁
  • 연산가능 일반균형 모형
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
134 0

0.0%

' 불완전경쟁 CGE모형을 이용한 한국 배출권 거래제의 경제효과 분석' 의 참고문헌

  • 환경경제학
    권오상 박영사 [2013]
  • 국가 온실가스 감축, 2020년 로드맵 마련
    환경부 환경부 보도자료 [2014]
  • 『환경정책 파급효과 분석을 위한 일반균형 모형개발』
    강성원 한국환경정책 평가연구원 [2012]
  • 『온실가스 배출권 초기할당방식에 관한연구』
    김용건 전지영 한국환경정책 평가연구원 [2010]
  • 『에너지통계연보』
    에너지경제연구원 [2010]
  • 『시장구조조사』
    한국개발연구원 [2013]
  • 『국제 온실가스 배출권 거래제도의 파급효과 분석』
    김용건 장기복 한국환경정책 평가연구원 [2008]
  • 『2013년도 국가 온실가스 인벤토리 보고서』
    온실가스종합정보센터 [2014]
  • 「효율적 기후변화 대응체계 구축방안」
    김용건 녹색성장 국가비전 선포 2주년 기념 심포지움. 환경부 [2010]
  • 「온실가스 저감정책과 파급효과: Global CGE모형에 의한 분석」
    조경화 경제학연구, 48(4), pp.323-368 [2000]
  • 「상품차별화된 시장에서 배출권 거래제도의 후생효과」
    박상하 이상호 자원 환경경제연구, 11(3), pp.415-446 [2002]
  • 「불완전경쟁시장에서의 배출권 거래제도의 효율성」
    윤경수 한국개발연구, 34(2), pp.173-204 [2011]
  • 「불완전경쟁 및 규모의 경제가 에너지산업에 미치는 영향」
    김진욱 박창원 자원 환경경제연구, 11(2), pp.291-319 [2002]
  • 「국내 온실가스 감축정책의 지역별 효과 분석」
    김수이 노동운 조경엽 한국경제연구, 28(3), pp.29-57 [2010]
  • WCI. (2010). Design for the WCI(Western Climate Initiative)Region Program
  • Truong, T. P., Kemfert, C. and Burniaux J. M. (2007).GTAP-E: An Energy-Environmental Version of the GTAPModel with Emission Trading, Berilin: DIW Berilin.
  • Tinbergen, J. (1959). Economic Policy: Principles and Design.The Economic Journal, 69(274), pp.353-356.
  • Tietenberg, T. H. (2006). Emissions Trading: Principles andPractice. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future.
  • Sartzetakis, E. S. (2004). On the Efficiency of CompetitiveMarkets for Emission Permits. Environmental and ResourceEconomics, 27, pp.1-19.
  • RGGI. (2014). Annual Report on the Market forRGGI(Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative) CO2 Allowances:2013.
  • Paltsev, S., Reilly, J. M., Jacoby, H. D., Eckaus, R. S.,McFarland, J., Sarofim, M., Malcolm, A. and Babiker, M.(2005). The MIT Emissions Prediction and PolicyAnalysis(EPPA) Model: Version 4. MIT Joint Program on theScience and Policy of Global Change, 125.
  • Nordhaus, W. (2008). A Question of Balance: Weighing theOptions on Global Warming Policies. Yale University Press.
  • Milliman, S. R. and Prince, R. (1989). Firm Incentives toPromote Technological Change in Pollution Control. Journal ofEnvironmental Economics and Management, 17, pp.247-265.
  • Meunier. G. (2011). Emission Permit Trading BetweenImperfectly Competitive Product Markets. Environmental andResource Econnomics, 50, pp.347-364.
  • Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1976). Econometric Policy Evaluation: ACritique. In Brunner K. and Meltzer, A. H., The PhillipsCurve and Labor Markets (pp.104-130). Amsterdam: NorthHolland Publishing Company.
  • Lee, C. F., Lin, S. J. and Lewis, C. (2008). Analysis of theImpacts of Combining Carbon Taxation and Emission Tradingon Different Industry Sectors. Energy Policy, 36,pp.722-729.
  • Laborde, D. and Cacheux, J. L. (2003.6). Price and WelfareEffects of Agricultural Liberalization with ImperfectCompetition in Food Industries and Trade. GTAP 6th annualconference, Hague, Netherlands.
  • Klein, L. R. and Preston, R. S. (1967). Some New Results inthe Measurement of Capacity Utilization. The AmericanEconomic Review, 57(1), pp.34-58.
  • Klein, L. R. (1950). Economic Fluctuations in the UnitedStates 1921-1941. New York: John Wiley and Sons,
  • Jorgenson, D. W. and Wilcoxen, P. J. (1990). EnvironmentalRegulation and U.S. Economic Growth. The Rand Journal ofEconomics, 21(2), pp.314-340.
  • Hung, N. M. and Sartzetakis, E. S. (1997). Cross-IndustryEmission Permit Trading. Journal of Regulatory Economics,13, pp. 37-46.
  • Hazilla, M. and Kopp, R. J. (1990). Social Cost ofEnvironmental Quality Regulations: A General EquilibriumAnalysis. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), pp.853-873.
  • Harris, R. (1984). Applied General Equilibrium Analysis ofSmall Open Economies and Imperfect Competition. TheAmerican Economic Review, 74(5), pp.1016-1032.
  • Gavard, C., Winchester, N., Jacoby, H. and Paltsev, S.(2011). What to Expect From Sectoral Trading: A US-ChinaExample. Climate Change Economics, 2(1), pp.9-26.
  • Ellerman, A. D., Joskow, P. L., Schmalensee, R., Montero,J.-P. and Bailey, E. M. (2000). Markets for Clean Air: TheU.S. Acid Rain Program. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • Ecomod. (2011). Environmental CGE　Modeling with GAMS,Ecomod Modeling School, USA.
  • Ecomod. (2010b). Advanced Techniques in CGE　Modelingwith GAMS, Ecomod Modeling School, Turkey.
  • Ecomod. (2010a). Practical Techniques in CGE Modeling withGAMS, Ecomod Modeling School, Singapore.
  • Dixit, A. K. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). MonopolisticCompetition and Optimum Product Diversity. The AmericanEconomic Review, 67, pp. 297-308.
  • Devarajan, S. and Rodrik, D. (1989). Trade Liberalization inDeveloping Countries: Do Imperfect Competition and ScaleEconomies matter? The American Economic Review, 79(2),pp.283-287.
  • Cory, P. and Horridge, M. (1985). A Harris-style MiniatureVersion of ORANI. Preliminary working paper, 54. Melbourne:Impact project.
  • Chateau, J. and Saint-Martin, A. (2013). Economic andEmployment Impacts of Climate Change Mitigation Policies inOECD: A General-Equilibrium Perspective. InternationalEconomics, 135?136, pp.79?103.
  • Carlson, C., Burtraw, D., Cropper, M., and Palmer, K. L.(2000). Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Arethe Gains From Trade? Journal of Political Economy, 108(6),pp.1292-1326.
  • Burtraw, D. (1999). Cost Savings, Market Performance andEconomic Benefits of the US Acid Rain Program. In S.Sorrell and J. Skea, Pollution for Sale(pp.43-62).Cheltenham Northampton: Edward Elgar.
  • Burniaux, J. M. and Chateau, J. (2008). An Overview of theOECD ENV-Linkages Model. OECD Economics DepartmentWorking Papers, 653. OECD Publishing.
  • Bernstein, P. M., Montgomery, W. D., Rutherford, T. F.,Yang, G. (1999). Effects of Restrictions on InternationalPermit Trading: The MS-MRT Model. In Economic Impact ofMitigation Measures(pp.27-55). IPCC. Hague: CPB.
  • Babiker, H. M. (2005). Climate Change Policy, MarketStructure, and Carbon Leakage. Journal of InternationalEconomics, 65(2), pp.421-445.