연구동향 분석
박사

알지네이트 인상을 이용한 디지털 치아모형 제작시 3차원영상 정확도에 관한 연구 : Dimensional Accurary of Digital Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Dental Model from Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scan of Alginate Impressions According to Time Elapse after Impressions

이상미 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 알지네이트 인상을 이용한 디지털 치아모형 제작시 3차원영상 정확도에 관한 연구 : Dimensional Accurary of Digital Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Dental Model from Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scan of Alginate Impressions According to Time Elapse after Impressions' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • alginate impression
  • cone-beam computed tomography
  • dimensional accuracy
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
64 0

0.0%

' 알지네이트 인상을 이용한 디지털 치아모형 제작시 3차원영상 정확도에 관한 연구 : Dimensional Accurary of Digital Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Dental Model from Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scan of Alginate Impressions According to Time Elapse after Impressions' 의 참고문헌

  • Xia J, Ip HH, Samman N, Wang D, Kot CS, Yeung RW, Tideman H. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;29:11-7.
  • Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:140-7.
  • White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:456.e1-9.
  • Uechi J, Okayama M, Shibata T, Muguruma T, Hayashi K, Endo K, et al. A novel method for the 3-dimensional simulation of orthognathic surgery by using a multimodal imagefusion technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:786-98.
  • Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD, Powers J, Bussa HI, Salas-Lopez AM, Corbett JA. Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 2010;80:662?9.
  • Tjan AHL, Whang SB, Tjan AH, Sarkissian R. Clinically oriented evaluation of the accuracy of commonly used impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:4-8.
  • Terajima M, Nakasima A, Aoki Y, Goto TK, Tokumori K, Mori N, et al. A 3-dimensional method for analyzing the morphology of patients with maxillofacial deformities. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:857-67.
  • Swennen GR, Mommaerts MY, Abeloos J, De Clercq C, Lamoral P, Neyt N, et al. A conebeam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:48-57.
  • Swennen GR, Mollemans W, De Clercq C, Abeloos J, Lamoral P, Lippens F, et al. A conebeam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:297-307.
  • Santler G, Karcher H, Ruda C. Indications and limitations of three-dimensional models in cranio- maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:11-6.
  • Rangel FA, Maal TJ, Berge SJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Integration of digital dental casts in cone-beam computed tomography scans. ISRN Dent 2012;949086.
  • Patzelt SBM, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners. JADA 2014;145:542-51.
  • Noh H, Nabha W, Cho JH, Hwang HS. Registration accuracy in the integration of laserscanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:585-91.
  • Nkenke E, Zachow S, Benz M, Maier T, Veit K, Kramer M, et al. Fusion of computed tomography data and optical 3D images of the dentition for streak artefact correction in the simulation of orthognathic surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:226-32.
  • Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho CTC. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J 2009;25:97-103.
  • Naidu D, Freer TJ. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: A comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:304-10.
  • Motohashi N, Kuroda T. A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:263-74.
  • Kim BC, Lee CE, Park W, Kang SH, Zhengguo P, Yi CK, et al. Integration accuracy of digital dental models and 3-dimensional computerized tomography images by sequential point and surface-based markerless registration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:370-8.
  • Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod 2005;32:282-93.
  • Hwang HS, Hwang CH, Lee KH, Kang BC. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:779-85.
  • Hayashi K, Sachdeva AUC, Saitoh S, Lee SP, Kubota T, Mizoguchi I. Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of new 3-dimensional scanning devices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:619-25.
  • Grunheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;146:673-82.
  • Girod S, Keeve E, Girod B. Advances in interactive craniofacial surgery planning by 3D simulation and visualization. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:120-5.
  • Gateno J, Xia J, Teichgraeber JF, Rosen A. A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:222-7.
  • Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:471-8.
  • Erbe C, Ruf S, Wostmann B, Balkenhol M. Dimensional stability ofcontemporary irreversible hydrocolloids: humidor versus wet tissuestorage. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:114-22.
  • De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:609-25.
  • Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 2009;36:36-41.
  • Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London, United Kingdom: George Allen & Unwin; 1940.
  • Cuperus AMR, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:308-13.
  • Cook W. Alginate dental impression materials: chemistry, structure,and properties. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:1-24.
  • Chen LH, Chen WH. Three-dimensional computer-assisted simulation combining facial skeleton with facial morphology for orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod on Orthognath Surg 1999;14:140-5.
  • Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:19-28.
  • Bailey E, Nelson G, Miller AJ, Andrews L, Johnson E. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: A new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:574-85.
  • Alcan T, Ceylanoglu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:30-6.