박사

국제법상 코소보의 일방적 독립선언의 합법성에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Legality of Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Kosovo under International Law

배남구 2015년
논문상세정보
' 국제법상 코소보의 일방적 독립선언의 합법성에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Legality of Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Kosovo under International Law' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • nato
  • 구제적 자결권
  • 국가승인
  • 권고적 의견
  • 내적 자결권
  • 랑부예협정
  • 분리독립
  • 외적 자결권
  • 인권
  • 일방적 독립선언
  • 자결권
  • 코소보
  • 코소보 독립
  • 코소보전쟁
  • 코소보해방군
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
1,000 0

0.0%

' 국제법상 코소보의 일방적 독립선언의 합법성에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Legality of Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Kosovo under International Law' 의 참고문헌

  • 합동참모본부,「한국군 평화유지활동(PKO) 파병사」
    서울: 합동참모본부 [1998]
  • 장신 이재곤 박덕영, 「국제법」
    김정건 서울: 박영사 [2010]
  • 옮김, 「국제조약」
    박웅용 법무사 [2006]
  • 신 국제법강의
    정인섭 제3판, 서울: 박영사 [2012]
  • 세계정세를 읽는 모임, 박소영 옮김, 「지도로 보는 세계분쟁」
    이다 미디어 [2007]
  • 국제인도법
    정운장 영남대학교 출판부 [1994]
  • 국제인권법 원론
    한희원 삼영사 [2012]
  • 국제법상 국가책임
    김석현 서울: 삼영사 [2007]
  • 小野里(?ントラ)光江, “現代國際法におはる不涉原則”,『法學政治學論究』第25號, 慶應義塾大學大學院 法學政治學論究刊行會, 1995, pp. 303 ff.
  • 『국제법론』
    김대순 제16판, 삼영사 [2010]
  • 『국제법』
    松井芳郎 서울: 박영사 [2004]
  • 『21세기 국제법의 현안과 과제』
    박기갑 삼우사 [2011]
  • 「유엔평화유지 이론에 관하여」
    이창훈 서울: 국방참모대학 [1997]
  • 「오늘의 세계분쟁」
    김재명 도서출판 미지북스 [2012]
  • 「세계의 분쟁」
  • 「발칸유럽사회와 문화」
    한국외국어대출판부 [2008]
  • 「국제법」제2판
    강병근 이재완 서울: 삼우사 [2012]
  • 「국제법 판례요약집」
    장 신 전남대학교 출판부 [2004]
  • 「국제법 원론」
    김명기 서울: 박영사 [1996]
  • 「국제법 강의」
    이한기 서울: 박영사 [2006]
  • “크림사태의 국제법적 함의”
    이근관 제1회 전문가 포럼, 숙명여대 백주년 기념, 2014.3.26 [2014]
  • “코소보와 신 국제 질서”
    조병제 「북한」 통권 제329호 [1999]
  • “코소보(Kosovo) 민족갈등에 관한연구: 세르비아니즘(serbianism)의 확 대와 저항이라는 관점에서”
    「동유럽발칸학」2 (1) : 195 ~ 219 [2000]
  • “코소보 사태의 국제법적고찰”
    羅仁均 「국제법평론」 제11호, -I, pp. 69-83 [1999]
  • “코소보 사태의 국제법적 고찰”
    이민효 「해양전략」 제106호, , pp. 57 ff [2000]
  • “코소보 사태로 인한 국제질서의 변화와 향후 전망”
    「국제문제」제30 권 제9호 통권 349호 [1999]
  • “코소보 사태가 국제안보구도 변화에 미치는 영향”
    「주간국방논단」, 한국국방연구원 [1999]
  • “코소보 분쟁의 양상과 향후전망”
    유영철 「국제문제」 [2000]
  • “코소보 분쟁의 양상과 향후 전망”
    「국제문제」제31권 제2호, 통권 354호 [1999]
  • “코소보 분쟁의 발생원인과 해결과정”
    손규석 분쟁해결연구, 5 (1) , pp. 99 ~ 132 [2007]
  • “코소보 분쟁, 그 2천년의 뿌리”
    김성진 「월간중앙」 [1999]
  • “전쟁범죄의 형사제재를 통한 분쟁희생자 보호 : 국제형사법원의 창설합 의에 즈음하여”
    이민효 「해양전략」제101호 [1998]
  • “인도적 목적을 위한 유엔안보리의 제제조치에 관한 연구”
    신성수 「국제법학 회논총」제42권 제2호 [1997]
  • “인권의 국제적 실천성에 관한 연구”
    김민수 「사회과학연구」제12권 제2호, 동국대학교 부설 사회과학연구원 [2006]
  • “인권보호를 위한 안보리의 개입”
    金奭賢(Seok-Hyun Kim) 「국제법학회논총」제40권 제1호 [1995]
  • “유엔 집단안전보장체제와 평화유지활동에 관한국제법적 고찰”
    김호춘 한국 해양대학교 대학원 해사법학과 박사학위논문 [2001]
  • “유고 연방 내전 격화 원인과 전망: 민족 갈등과 강대국 간의 각축 관 계 ”
    전정환 「국방 저널」, 제305호 [1999]
  • “안전보장이사회 결의의 합법성과 사법심사”
    「국제법학회논총」제44권 제1호 [1999]
  • “발칸지역의 코소보 분쟁”
    연규석 「중동연구」제18-2권 [1999]
  • “발칸반도 분쟁이 남긴 교훈”
    조영갑 「국방저널」 309, , pp. 61 ff [1999]
  • “민족자결의 규범성”
    「비교법학」전주대학교 비교법학연구소, 제2집 [2002]
  • “민족자결권의 주체”
    愼鏞鎬(Yong-Ho SHIN) 「국제법학회논총」제43권 제1호 [1998]
  • “민간인의 보호: 걸프전에서의 논점을 통해 본 국제인도법의 새로운 과 제”
    김정균 「인도법논총」제12호 [1992]
  • “무력사용, 유엔, 그리고 코소보 사태”
    백진현 「국제문제」통권 제346호 [1999]
  • “국제법상 자결권의 개념과 그 형성과정”
    이성덕 「국제법학회논총」제48권 제 1호, , pp. 8 ff [2003]
  • “국제법상 인도적 간섭의 합법성에 관한 일고찰”
    제성호 「국제법학회논총」 제32권 제2호 [1986]
  • “국제기구와 평화유지기능”
    李承憲(Seung Huhn Rhee) 「국제법학회논총」제5권 1호 [1960]
  • “구유고 국제형사법원의 관할권에 관한 국제법상의 제 문제”
    박배근 하재환 부산대학교 법학연구 37(1), , pp. 131 ff [1996]
  • “NATO 코소보 사태에 대한 개입의 합법성”
    배정생 공주대학교 인문사회 과학 연구소, 겨울, 14집 [1999]
  • “NATO 신전략 개념의 추진방향”
    이은득 「교수논총」제32집, 국방대학교 [2003]
  • http://www.unmikonline.org /
  • http://www.spiegel.de/
  • http://www.sok-kosovo.org /
  • http://www.nytimes.com
  • http://www.nato.int/issues/kosovo /
  • http://www.munhwa.com/
  • http://www.mfa.gov.rs/Policy/Priorities/bse /
  • http://www.mfa.gov.rs/Foreinframe1.htm /
  • http://www.lwv.org/join/global /
  • http://www.kida.re.kr
  • http://www.fnnews.com/view /
  • http://www.europa.eu
  • http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu /
  • http://www.eu.org
  • http://www.diplomacy.bg.ac.rs/ria/ria1120_1121.htm /
  • http://www.coe.int /
  • http://www.balkanpeace.org /
  • http://www.atkearney.com /
  • http://news.khan.co.kr /
  • http://blog.peoplepower21org/international / Independent International Commission on Kosovo / 2000 / Kosovo report: Conflict - International Response - Lessons Learned / Oxford University Press.
  • Zimmermann A., Yugoslav Territory, United Nations Trusteeship or Sovereign State? Reflections on the Current and Future Legal Status of Kosovo, Nordic Journal of International Law 70, 2001.
  • Yannis, A, The UN Government in Kosovo Global Governance. 10: 67-81. Zimmeramnn, Warren(1998) “The Demons of Kosovo / The National Interest 52 : 3 ~ 11, 1998
  • Written Statement of the United States of America, 2009.
  • Written Statement of the U.K, 2009.
  • Written Comments of the U.S.A, 2009.
  • World Investment Prospects to 2011.
  • Wippman D., Kosovo and the Limits of International Law, Fordham International Law Journal 25, 2001, pp. 129 ff.
  • Western Sahara, Advisory Opinion, 1975, pp. 18 ff.
  • Western Sahara Case, 1975.
  • Washington Times, 1999.
  • Vukadinovic, Radovan, The Enlargement of NATO and the Countries of the Former Yugoslavia, Peace and Security, 29, 1997, pp. 13 ~ 23.
  • UNHCR, The State of the World’s Refugees (1995), pp. 60-61; UNHCR, “Refugee Women”, 100 Refugees (1995), pp. 3-9.
  • UN Year Book, 2011.
  • Tomuschat C., Modern Law of Self-Determination, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993.
  • Time Almanac 2011 Powered by Encyclopedia Britannica
  • Thomas G. Weise, “New Challenge for U.N. Military Operations: Comple -menting on Agenda for Peace”, 16 The Washington Quarterly (1993), p. 57.
  • The Independent International Commission on Kosovo, The Kosovo Report, Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Stopford, M., Humanitarian Assistance in the Wake of the Persian Gulf War, Virginia Journal of International Law 33, 1993, pp. 491-502.
  • Status of Eastern Carelia, Advisory Opinion, P.C.I.J. 5, 1923, pp. 29 ff.
  • Spernbauer M., EUREX Kosovo: The Difficult Deployment and Challenging Implementation of the Most Comprehensive Civilian EU Operation to Date, German L. J. 11, 2010, pp. 769 ff.
  • Sohn L. B., The New International Law: Protection of the Rights of Individuals Rather Than States, American University Law Review 32, 1982.
  • Smith G., Statehood, Ethnic Relations and Citizenship, in The Baltic States: The National Self-Determination of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, Macmillan Press, 1996.
  • Serchuk, Vance, The Future of Kosovo, In The Review of International Affairs, Institute of International Politics and Economics, 2006. pp. 1120 ~ 1121.
  • Separate Opinion of Judge Yusuf, 2010.
  • Separate Opinion of Judge Sep lveda-Amor, 2010.
  • Separate Opinion of Judge Keith, 2010.
  • Separate Opinion of Judge A. A., 2010.
  • Security Council Resolution 417, 1977.
  • Security Council Resolution 277, 1970.
  • Security Council Resolution 217, 1965.
  • Security Council Resolution 216, 1965.
  • Security Council Resolution 202, 1965.
  • Security Council Resolution 1660, 1998.
  • Security Council Resolution 1244, 1999.
  • Rupp, Richard, NATO 1999 and NATO 2000: from Collective Defense toward Collective Security, Journal of Strategic Studies, 2000, 23 (9), 2000, pp. 154 ~ 176.
  • Rich R., Recognition of States: The Collapse of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, European Journal of International Law 4, 1991.
  • Reference re Secession of Quebec, 1998, pp. 217 ff.
  • Ray M., UN Peacekeeping in Lebanon, Somalia and Kosovo: Operational and Legal Issues in Practice, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Rao, Rahul, The UN and NATO in the new world order: legal issue, International Studies 37 (3), 2000, pp. 157 ~ 181.
  • Ramet, Pedro, Religion and Nationalism in Soviet and East European Politics, Duke Univ. Press, 1984.
  • Press Statement by Dr. Javier Solana, Secretary General of NATO, 23 March 1999, NATO Press Release (1999) 040.
  • Pomerance M., Self-determination in Law and Practice: The New Doctrine in the United Nations, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982.
  • Park J., Integration of Peoples and Minorities: An Approach to the Conceptual Problem of Peoples and Minorities with reference to Self-Determination under International Law, International Journal on Minority and Groups Rights 13, 2006, pp. 69 ff.
  • Palmer, N., The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific, Lexington Books, 1991.
  • O’hanlon, S. J., Humanitarian Intervention: When if Force justified?, The Washington Quarterly, 20(No. 4), 1997, pp.13-14.
  • Orford, A., Locating the International: Military and Monetary Interventions after the Cold War, Harvard International Law Journal 38, 1997, pp. 445-446.
  • Orakhelashvili A., The Kosovo UDI between Agreed Law and Subjective Perception: A Response to Hilpold, Chinese J. I. L. 8, 2009, pp. 285 ff.
  • Naegele, Jolyon / 2006 / The Pristina-Belgrade Technical Dialogue as a Prologue to Status Talks: Lessons to be Learned in Serbia in Europe / Transaction Publishers : 133 ~ 146.
  • Musgrave T. D., Self-Determination and National Minorities, Oxford University Press, 1997.
  • Muharremi R., A Note on the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo, German L. J. 11, 2010, pp. 867 ff.
  • Moshes, Arkady, Littoral States and Region Building Around the Black Sea, In The Black Sea Region: Cooperation and Security Building, M. E. Sharpe, 2003.
  • Moore, J. N., Toward an applied Theory for Regulation of Intervention, Law and Civil war in the Modern World, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.
  • Meron T., War Crimes in Yugoslavia and the Development of International Law, A. J. I. L., 1994, pp. 78 ff.
  • Meindersma, C., Violation of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions as Violations of the Laws or Customs of War under Article 3 of the Statue of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, 26 Netherland International Law Review, 26, 1995, pp. 375-396.
  • Maurice, F. and Courten, J., ICRC Activities for Refugees and Displaced Civilians, IRRC, 280, 1991, pp. 10-13.
  • Martin D. A., Reluctance to Prosecute War Crimes: Causes and Curses, Virginia Journal of International Law 34, 1994, pp. 255 ff.
  • Marjori C., The myth of Humanitarian Intervention in Kosovo in Lessons of Kosovo, Broadview, 2004, pp. 121 ~ 152.
  • Malanczuk P., Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law, Routledge, 1997.
  • Lieven A., The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the Path to Independence, Yale University Press, 1993.
  • Lesser, Ian O. Global Trends, Regional Consequences: Wider Strategic Influences on the Black Sea, International Center for Black Sea Studies, 2007.
  • Legality of Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, 1996, pp. 226 ff.
  • Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 2004, pp. 156 ff.
  • Legal Consequences for States of Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276, 1970, pp 24.
  • Kumbaro D., The Kosovo Crisis in an International Law Perspective: Self-Determination, Territorial Integrity and the NATO Intervention, NATO, 2001.
  • Kosovo Declaration of Independence, 2008.
  • Knudsen, Tonny Brens / 2006 / From UNMIK to Self- determination?: The Puzzle of Kosovo's future status in Kosovo between War and Peace / Routledge : 156 ~ 167.
  • Kiwanuka R. N., The Meaning of “People” in the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, A. J. I. L. 82, 1988, pp. 80 ff.
  • Keith, K. J., The Present State of International Humanitarian Law, The Australian Yearbook of International Law, 1985, pp. 17 ff.
  • Judgements of the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO upon complaints made against the Unesco, 1956, pp. 86 ff.
  • Jashari J., UN Field Mission in the Context of Legal and Judicial Reform: The Kosovo Case, Columbia Journal of East European Law 76, 2007, pp. 76 ff.
  • Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, First Phase, Advisory Opinion, 1950, pp. 71 ff.
  • Human Right Watch, Global Report on Women’s Human Rights (1995), p.1.
  • Hilpold P., The Kosovo Case and International Law: Looking for Applicable Theories, Chinese J. I. L. 8, 2009, pp. 47 ff.
  • Higgins R., Post-modern Tribalism and the Right to Secession, Comments, in Peoples and Minorities in International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993.
  • Heraclides A., The Self-Determination of Minorities in International Law and Politics, Frank Cass, 1991.
  • Harris D., Cases and Materials on International Law, Sweet & Maxwell, 2004.
  • Harff B., Ethnic Conflict in World Politics, Westview Press, 2004.
  • Hannum H., Autonomy, Sovereignty and Self-Determination, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.
  • Halperin M. H., Self-Determination in the New World Order, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1992.
  • Gurr T. R., Minorities at Risk, United States Institute of Peace Press, 1993.
  • Gross, O., The Grave breaches system and the Armed Conflict in the former Yugoslavia, Michigan Journal of International Law 16, 1995, pp. 821-823.
  • Gerhard von Glahn, Law AmongNations: An Introduction to Public International Law(5th ed) (Macmillan Company, 1986), p 173.
  • Gerhard von Glahn ? James Larry Taulbee, Law Among Nations, 2009.
  • G.A. Res. 63/3, 2008.
  • G.A. Res. 31/6, art. A, 1976.
  • G.A. Res. 2775 (XXV), 1971.
  • G.A. Res. 2671 (XXV), art. F, 1970.
  • G.A. Res. 2024, 1965.
  • G.A. Res. 2022, 1965.
  • Frontier Dispute Case (Burkina Faso v. Republic of Mali), 1986.
  • Financial Times
  • Final Report of the Commission of Experts established pursuant to the Secretary Council Resolution 780, U.N., Doc. S/ 1994/ 674 (1994), Paras. 102~109, 232~253.
  • Falk R. A., The Haiti Interdiction: A Dangerous World Order Precedent for the United Nations, Harvard International Law Journal, 1995, pp. 341 ff.
  • Elder, The Historical Background of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention of 1949, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 1979, pp. 54 ff.
  • East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, 1995, pp. 90 ff. EPA(European Pressphoto Agency)
  • Dugard J., Recognition and the United Nations, Grotius Publications Limited, 1987.
  • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Skotinikov, 2010.
  • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Koroma, 2010.
  • Difference relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights, 1999, pp. 78 ff. Dissenting Opinion of Judge Bennouna, 2010.
  • Declaration of Vice-President Tomka, 2010.
  • Declaration of Judge Simma, 2010.
  • Crook J. R., Contemporary Practice of the United States relating to International Law, United States Opposes Request for ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo, A. J. I. L. 103, 2009, pp. 140 ff.
  • Crawford J., State Practice and International Law in relation to Unilateral Secession, Department of Justice.
  • Crawford J., State Practice and International Law in Relation to Secession, British Yearbook of International Law 69, 1998.
  • Cirkovic E., An Analysis of the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo's Unilateral Declaration of Independence, German L. J. 11, 2010, pp. 895 ff.
  • Chinkin, C., Rape and Sexual Abuse of Women in International Law, European Journal of International Law 5, 1994, pp. 327-328.
  • Charney J. J., Anticipatory Humanitarian Intervention in Kosovo, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 32, 1999, pp. 1231 ff.
  • Cassese, A., International Law, Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • CIA The World Factbook
  • Burri T., The Kosovo Opinion and Secession: The Sound of Silence and Missing Links, German L. J. 11, 2010, pp. 881 ff.
  • Buchheit L.C., Secession: The Legitimacy of Self-Determination, Yale University Press, 1978.
  • Buchanan A., Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec, Westview Press, 1991.
  • Brownlie,I., International Law and the Use of Force by States (Oxford/N.Y.: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, 1963), pp. 338-339.
  • Brand M. G., Institution Building and Human Rights Protection in Kosovo in the Light of UNMIK Legislation, Nordic Journal of International Law 70, 2001.
  • Bowet, D. W.,The Interrelation of Theories of Intervention and Self-Defence, John N. Moore(ed), Law and Civil War in the Modern World(Baltimore/London, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), p. 75.
  • Bazyler M. J., Reexamining the Doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention in the Right of the Atrocities in Kampuchea and Ethiopia, Stanford Journal of International Law, 1986, pp. 570 ff.
  • Arp B., The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in respect of Kosovo and the International Protection of Minorities, German L. J. 11, 2010, pp. 847 ff.
  • Application for Review of Judgement No. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, 1982, pp. 334 ff.
  • Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in respect of Kosovo, 2010.
  • What Role for Academic Writers in Interpreting International Law? A Rejoinder to Orakhelashvili, Chinese J. I. L. 8, 2009, pp. 291 ff.
  • The UN as Government in Kosovo, Global Governance 10, 2004, pp. 67 ff.
  • The Rights of Peoples”: ‘People’ or ‘Governments’?, in The Rights of Peoples, Clarendon Press, 1988.
  • The Right of Self-Determination in International Law: Its Development and Future, in Peoples’ Rights, Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • The Creation of States in International Law, Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • Kosovo and the Pitfalls of Over-Theorizing International Law: Observation on Hilpold's Rejoinder, Chinese J. I. L. 8, 2009, pp. 589 ff.
  • International Criminalization of Internal Atrocities, A. J. I. L. 89, 1995, pp. 561 ff.