연구동향 분석
박사

인지 과정의 개인차 측정을 위한 인지 측정 모듈의 구축

김영준 2015년

논문상세정보
인용/피인용
' 인지 과정의 개인차 측정을 위한 인지 측정 모듈의 구축' 의 주제별 논문영향력
논문영향력 선정 방법
논문영향력 요약
주제
  • 개인차
  • 인지 증진
  • 인지과정
  • 측정 모듈
  • 훈련 효과
동일주제 총논문수 논문피인용 총횟수 주제별 논문영향력의 평균
102 0

0.0%

' 인지 과정의 개인차 측정을 위한 인지 측정 모듈의 구축' 의 참고문헌

  • 효율적인 인지욕구 측정: 단축형 척도개발
    김완석 한국심리학회지: 소비자광고, 8 (1), 127-133 [2007]
  • 핵심 역량 교육 프로그램 개발 및 운영: 1차 연구 결과 보고서
    김영진 등 수원: 아주대학교 [2008]
  • 한국형 인지욕구척도 개발연구
    김완석 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 7(1), 87-101 [1994]
  • 통찰문제의 재구조화를 활용한 문제발견 검사로서의 K-RAT (Korean-Restructuring Test) 개발 및 타당화
    송인섭 한윤영 교육심리연구, 26(4), 1023-1051 [2012]
  • 통섭적 인생의 권유
    최재천 서울: 명진출판사 [2013]
  • 통계청. (n.d.)
    통계용어 지표 이해의 제 4장 인구통계 부문. from http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_ki/2/4/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=&pageN o=&rowNum=10&amSeq=&sTarget=&sTxt= [1989]
  • 장노년 인지능력 기술 개발
  • 인지심리학 개정판
  • 인지심리학 6판 (민윤기 역). 서울: 박학사
    Matlin, M. W. (원서 출판 2004) [2007]
  • 인지과제를 통한 독서이해력의 개인차 연구
    김영진 최광일 한국심리학회지 인지 및 생물, 22(2), 233-245 [2010]
  • 문항반응이론을 적용한 한국형 재구조화연합검사(K-RAT)의 문항탐색
    한윤영 영재와 영재교육, 12(2), 93-113
  • 메타인지의 개인차 측정. 학위논문(석사)
    오영록 수원: 아주대학교 일반대학원 심리학과 [2012]
  • 독서이해과정의 개인차: 인지과제 수행과 안구운동 패턴. 학위논문(박사)
    최광일 수원: 아주대학교 일 반대학원 심리학과 [2007]
  • 독서이해과정에서의 작업기억의 역할. 학위논문(석사)
    이송이 수원: 아주대학교 일반대학원 심리학과 [2011]
  • 개인차분석법을 이용한 실험결과의 통계적 분석의 확장
    김청택 한국심리학회지 : 실험 및 인지, 14(2), 107-126 [2002]
  • Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta psychologica , 41(1), 67-85.
  • Tzelgov, J., Yehene, V., Kotler, L., & Alon, A. (2000). Automatic Comparisons of Artificial Digits Never Compared: Learning Linear Ordering Relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26(1), 103-120.
  • Tuerlinckx, F., & De Boeck, P. (2005). Two interpretations of the discrimination parameter. Psychometrika , 70(4), 629-650.
  • Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Thorndike, E. L. & Woodworth, R. S. (1901) "The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions", Psychological Review 8, 247-261.
  • Tartaglione, E. V., Derleth, M., Yu, L., & Ioannou, G. N. (2014). Can Computerized Brain Training Games be Used to Identify Early Cognitive Impairment in Cirrhosis[quest]. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 109(3), 316-323.
  • Swets, J. (1986b). Indices of discrimination of diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models, Psychological Bulletin, 99, 100-117.
  • Swets, J. (1986a). Form of Empirical ROCs in Discrimination and Diagnostic Tasks: Implications for Theory and Measurement of Performance, Psychological Bulletin, 99, 181-198.
  • Svinicki, M. (n.d.). Transfer Continua from http://www.utexas.edu/courses/svinicki/ald320/Transferohs.html
  • Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economics, societies and nations. New York: Doubleday.
  • Sternberg, S. (1996). High Speed Scanning in Human Memory. Science, 153, 652-654.
  • Spencer, H. (1864). Principles of Biology(revised and enlarged: 1898).
  • Spearman.C.(1904).GeneralIntelligence,"ObjectivelyDeterminedandMeasured. TheAmericanJournalofPsychology.15(2), 201-292.
  • Shavelon, R. & Webb, N. (1991). Generalizability Theory: A Primer, Sage: CA.
  • Shah, P., Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S., & Jonides, J. (2012). Cognitive training for ADHD: the importance of individual differences. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 204-205.
  • Seidl, R., Peyrl, A., Nicham, R., & Hauser, E. (2000). A taurine and caffeine-containing drink stimulates cognitive performance and well-being. Amino acids, 19(3-4), 635-642.
  • Savulescu, J., Sandberg, A., & Kahane, G. (2011). Well?Being and Enhancement. Enhancing human capacities, 1-18.
  • Sattler, J. M, (1992). Assessment of children: Revised and updated third edition. San Diego: Sattler.
  • Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do Reaction Time and Accuracy Measure the Same Aspects of Letter Recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 8(4), 489-501.
  • Revlin, R. (2012). Cognition: Theory and Practice. New York: WORTH.
  • Reed, S. K. (2007). Cognition: Theories and Applications 8th, Belmont: WADSWORTH.
  • Rebok, G. W., Ball, K., Guey, L. T., Jones, R. N., Kim, H.-Y., King, J. W., . . . for the, A. S. G. (2014). Ten-Year Effects of the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Cognitive Training Trial on Cognition and Everyday Functioning in Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62(1), 16-24.
  • Raven, J., Raven, J. C. & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven manual: Section 4. Advanced Progressive Matrices. Pearson.
  • Raven, J. C. (1976). Advanced Progressive Matrices Set II. Pearson.
  • Rafal, R., Gershberg, F., Egly, R., Ivry, R., Kingstone, A., & Ro, T. (1996). "Response channel activation and the lateral prefrontal cortex". Neuropsychologia 34: 1197?1202.
  • Ponnamperuma, C. (1971). Primordial organic chemistry and the origin of life. Quarterly reviews of biophysics, 4(2-3), 77-106.
  • Peterson, L. R., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193-198.
  • Perrig, W. J., Hollenstein, M., & Oelhafen, S. (2009). Can we improve fluid intelligence with training on working memory in persons with intellectual disabilities? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology , 8, 148?164.
  • Palermo, D. S., & Eberhart, L. (1968). On the learning of morphological rules: An experimental analogy. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 7, 337-344.
  • Pachella, R. G., & Pew, R. W. (1968). Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Reaction Time: Effect of Discrete Criterion Times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1p1), 19.
  • Novick, L. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 17(3), 398.
  • Neisser, U. (1964). Visual search. Scientific American 210(6), 94-102.
  • Mulder, M. J., & van Maanen, L. (2013). Are Accuracy and Reaction Time Affected via Different Processes? PLoS ONE, 8(11), e80222.
  • Mueller, S. C. (2011). The influence of emotion on cognitive control: relevance for development and adolescent psychopathology. Frontiers in psychology, 2.
  • Morgan, D. L., & Morgan, R. K. (2001). Single-participant research design: Bringing science to managed care. American Psychologist , 56(2), 119-127.
  • Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological review, 69(3), 220.
  • Maris, G., & van der Maas, H. (2012). Speed-accuracy response models: Scoring rules based on response time and accuracy. Psychometrika , 77(4), 615-633.
  • Lupi ez, J., Mil n, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1241-1254.
  • Luchins, A.S., & Luchins, E.H. (1950). New experimental attempts at preventing mechanization in problem solving. Journal of General Psychology, 42, 279-297.
  • Luce, R. D. (1986). Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization3 (No. 8). Oxford University Press.
  • Le Deist,F.D.,& Winterton,J.(2005).What is competence.HumanResourceDevelopmentInternational,8(1),27-46.
  • Kyllonen,P.C.,& Christal,R.E.(1990).Reasoning ability is(littlemore than)working memory capacity?!Intelligence,14(4),389-433.
  • Kueider, A. M., Parisi, J. M., Gross, A. L., & Rebok, G. W. (2012). Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE , 7(7), e40588.
  • Kluckhohn, H. A. Murray, & D. M. Schneider(Eds.), Personality in nature, society, and culture (pp53-67). USA: A. Knopf.
  • Kluckhohn, C. E., & Murray, H. A. (1953). Personality Formation: The Determinants. In C. E.
  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge university press.
  • Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Kelley, K., & Preacher, K. J. (2012). On effect size. Psychological methods, 17(2), 137.
  • Kaufman, S. B. (2013). New Cognitive Training Study Takes on the Critics. Beautiful Minds of Scientific AmericanTM, from http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/2013/10/09/new-cognitive-training-stu dy-takes-on-the-critics/
  • Kaku, M. (2014). The Future of the Mind: The Scientific Quest to Understand, Enhance, and Empower the Mind. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing.
  • Jaeggi, S. M., Studer, B., Buschkuehl, M., Su, Y.-F., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2010). On The Relationship Between N-back Performance and Matrix Reasoning - Implications for Training and Transfer. Intelligence , 38(6), 625-635.
  • Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Shah, P., & Jonides, J. (2014). The role of individual differences in cognitive training and transfer. Memory & cognition, 42(3), 464-480.
  • Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Shah, P. (2011). Short-and long-term benefits of cognitive training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(25), 10081-10086.
  • Iuculano, T., & Kadosh, R. C. (2013). The mental cost of cognitive enhancement. The Journal of Neuroscience , 33(10), 4482-4486.
  • Ingham, J. G. (1970). Individual differences in signal detection. Acta Psychologica , 34(0), 39-50.
  • Husain, M., & Mehta, M. A. (2011). Cognitive enhancement by drugs in health and disease. Trends in cognitive science s, 15(1), 28-36.
  • Hershberger, S. L. (2005). Factor score estimation. In B. S. Everitt and D. C. Howell (Eds.) Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. (pp. 636-644). New York: John Wiley.
  • Gusev, A. N., & Schapkin, S. A. (2001). Individual differences in auditory signal detection task: subject-oriented study. na.
  • Goldstein, E. B. (2010). Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research and Everyday Experience 3rd. Canada: WADSWORTH.
  • Glickman, M., Gray, J., & Morales, C. (2005). Combining speed and accuracy to assess error-free cognitive processes. Psychometrika , 70(3), 405-425.
  • Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychological scienc e, 7(4), 237-241.
  • Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics 40, 225-240.
  • Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evol. Anthropol. 6 (5): 178?190.
  • DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(20), 1-11.
  • Davidson, D. J., & Martin, A. E. (2013). Modeling accuracy as a function of response time with the generalized linear mixed effects model. Acta Psychologica , 144(1), 83-96.
  • David-Barrett, T. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Processing Power Limits Social Group Size: Computational Evidence for the Cognitive Costs of Sociality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280 (1765): 20131151.
  • Danforth, J. S. (1998). The outcome of parent training using the behavior management flow chart with mothers and their children with oppositional defiant disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Modification , 22(4), 443-473.
  • Cattell. R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54. 1-22.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Carroll, J. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: a survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological review, 97(3), 404.
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of personality and social psychology, 42(1), 116.
  • Buchanan, A. (2009). HUMAN NATURE AND ENHANCEMENT. Bioethics, 23(3), 141-150.
  • Brown, S. W., Newcomb, D. C., & Kahrl, K. G. (1995). Temporal-signal detection and individual differences in timing. Perception , 24(5), 525-538.
  • Brewer, W.F. (1977). Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences. Memory & Cognition , 5, 673-678.
  • Brennan,R.L.(2001).Generalizabilitytheory.New York:Springer.
  • Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive psychology, 3(2), 193-209.
  • Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior , 11(6), 717-726.
  • Bostrom, N., & Sandberg, A. (2009b). The wisdom of nature: an evolutionary heuristic for human enhancement. Human enhancement, 375-416.
  • Bostrom, N., & Sandberg, A. (2009). Cognitive enhancement: methods, ethics, regulatory challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(3), 311-341.
  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47?89). New York: Academic Press.
  • Ator, N. A. (1999). Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Environmental determinants? The Behavior Analyst , 22(2), 93-97.
  • Anderson, R. (2012). Why Cognitive Enhancement Is in Your Future (and Your Past). from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/02/why-cognitive-enhancement-is-inyour- future-and-your-past/252566/